簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 江豐岱
FENG-TAI CHIANG
論文名稱: 輔助線上討論教學活動之心智工具之發展與評估:以高中資訊倫理教學為例
Development and Evaluation of the Mind-tools for Assisting Online Discussion Teaching Activity: A Case of High School Information Ethic Instruction
指導教授: 張國恩
Chang, Kuo-En
宋曜廷
Sung, Yao-Ting
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 97
中文關鍵詞: 心智工具部落格資訊倫理與資訊素養線上學習資訊教育
英文關鍵詞: mind-tools, blog, information ethics and literacy, online learning, information education
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:138下載:7
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 線上討論的教學活動日益受到重視,而部落格也是眾多網路互動工具中可促進知識建構與互動有潛力的工具之一。以往的研究指出若是有適當工具的輔助,將可以使線上討論學習的效益更為提升。因此本研究欲設計一系列的心智工具,以輔助部落格線上討論教學活動。結合部落格運用於高中生的資訊倫理學習單元中,評估學習者有無使用線上討論輔助心智工具的學習成效與討論內容中認知歷程的差異。
    本研究之研究對象為台北市某普通高中六個班級之二年級學生,共267位學生,研究分為三組。實驗組1為使用基礎心智工具(一般輔助知識搜尋之工具)之組別,實驗組2為使用進階心智工具(基礎心智工具再加入知識彙整功能)之組別,而控制組則為使用一般部落格,無使用心智工具之組別;如此進行線上討論專題活動。
    本研究採用量化及質化內容分析,根據研究結果發現:一、學生在運用心智工具後,資訊科技相關法律知識顯著較控制組的學生為高。二、運用心智工具的學生,在活動歷程中,達到基礎認知理解層次的討論內容佔總活動發言內容的比例顯著優於控制組,而在與學習主題無關的發言內容中數量比例則低於控制組。而進一步的分析發現,使用進階心智工具的學生,在基礎認知理解討論的專家編碼結果數量比例高於使用基礎心智工具的學生,在進階認知層次(分析與評鑑)討論的專家編碼結果數量比例亦高亦高於使用基礎心智工具的學生而在與學習主題無關的發言內容數量比例上則低於使用基礎心智工具的學生。上述的結果說明了本研究所發展的工具對於促進學習者在部落格討論活動中知識獲得與認知技能的成效。

    The importance of online discussion instructional activities has been emphasized these days, and blog is one of the online interactive tools that promote knowledge construction and interaction. Previous studies showed that the benefit of online discussion can be enhanced if appropriate tools were used. The study, therefore, aims to design a series of mind-tools to assist blog-based discussion teaching activities. The study also integrates blogs in the information ethic instruction for high school students to evaluate learners’ learning outcomes and their cognitive process in discussion with or without the online discussion instructional activities.
    Participants in this study included 267 high school students of the 2nd year from six classes in Taipei city. They were divided into three groups for online discussion activities: the first experimental group used the basic mind-tool that assisted in information searching; the second experimental group used the advanced mind-tool that added the information integration function besides the other functions in the basic mind-tool; the control group used traditional blogs without any mind-tools.
    Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used in this study. The results showed that students with the mind-tools indicated better knowledge in information technology laws than the control group. Moreover, students with the mind-tools had more discussions that reach the basic cognitive level and fewer irrelevant discussions than the control group. Our further analysis showed that students who used the advanced mind-tool had more codes in the discussions of basic cognitive level than the students who used the basic mind-tool as well as in the discussions of advanced cognitive level (e.g., analysis and evaluation). They also had fewer irrelevant discussions than the students with the basic mind-tool. These findings indicated that the tools developed in this study may promote learners’ knowledge and cognitive skills in the blog-based discussion activities.

    摘要 I ABSTRACT II 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 6 第二章 文獻探討 8 第一節 部落格在教育領域的運用 8 第二節 心智工具 15 第三節 資訊倫理與資訊素養 19 第三章 系統功能 26 第一節 理論基礎 26 第二節 系統架構 30 第三節 系統開發環境與工具 32 第四節 知識搜尋工具 32 第五節 最愛連結工具 35 第六節 知識筆記工具 37 第七節 知識彙整工具 39 第四章 研究方法 41 第一節 研究架構 41 第二節 研究參與者 43 第三節 研究工具 44 第四節 研究程序 45 第五節 資料蒐集與分析 49 第五章 結果與討論 51 第一節 學習成效分析 51 第二節 部落格討論內容認知歷程分析 56 第三節 線上討論活動態度分析 59 第四節 綜合討論 64 第六章 結論與建議 67 第一節 結論 67 第二節 建議 68 第三節 未來研究方向 70 參考文獻 72 附錄一 線上討論案例 82 附錄二 部落格線上討論活動說明 83 附錄三 部落格小工具教學 85

    一、中文部份
    戈立秀(2007)。部落客之資訊蒐集與分享行為之研究。國立臺灣大學文學院圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文,臺北市。

    何榮桂、郭再興(1996)。多媒體電腦輔助教學在網路上的發展趨勢。資訊與教育, 55, 25-31.

    吳明待(2003)。網路學習環境的使用者及其相關因素之研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文,高雄。

    林國憲(2012)。使用電腦心智工具對學生學習策略與成效的效應之研究。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文,臺北市。

    林湘玲(2008)。部落格融入校園植物教學之課程設計。科學教育,313,25-37。

    教育部(2008)。97 年課綱。教育部,臺北市。

    莊道明(1996)。圖書館專業倫理。台北:文華出版社。

    許孟祥、林東清(1997)。資訊倫理守則現況:以社會層級及倫理議題分析。中山管理評論,5(2),383-412。

    陳一民(2003)。運用部落格建置校園植物網路教學之行動研究。國立中正大學教學專業發展數位學習碩士論文,嘉義縣。
    陳檳清、賴敏慧、張宗文、黃賢耀(2012)。高職教師採用教學部落格的關鍵因素。科技與工程教育學刊,45(1),1-25。

    馮芳菁(2004)。國小高年級資優生以網路進行獨立研究之現況調查研究。國立嘉義大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,嘉義。

    溫嘉榮、施文玲、鄧朱雅(2005)。運用同儕教練與合作學習於導入數位化教學的師資培訓之研究。教育學刊,25,103-126。

    蔡郁薇(2008)。混成學習之部落格輔助教學對學習滿意度的影響。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。

    蔡崇元(2001)。網路教學者教學互動策略之研究─以大學推廣教育教師為例。臺灣師範大學社會教育學系學位論文,臺北市。

    鄭蕙如、林世華(2004)。Bloom認知領域教育目標分類修訂版理論與實務之探討–以九年一貫園數學領域分段能力指標為例。台東教育學報,15(2),247–274。

    籃玉君(2008)。運用部落格提升資優生在獨立研究中自我引導能力之成效研究。資優教育研究,8(2),79-104。

    二、英文部份
    American Library Association. (1989). The Final Report of the American Library Association President Committee on Information Literacy. Retrieved June 20, 2010, from: http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential

    Baggetun, R., & Wasson, B. (2006). Selfregulated learning and open writing. European Journal of Education, 41,453-472.

    Bangert, A. W. (2004). The seven principles of good practice: a framework for evaluating on-line teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(3), 217–232.

    Barger, J. (1999). Weblog resources FAQ. Robot Wisdom, 16.

    Behrens, S. J. (1994). A Conceptual Analysis and Historical Overview of Information Literacy. College and Research Libraries, 55(4), 302-309.

    Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Bloom, B. S., Englehard, E., Furst, W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: McKay.

    Boyle, J. T., & Nicol, D. J. (2003).Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 11(3), 43–57.

    Buffington, M. L. (2007). Blogging with graduate students. Distance Learning, 4(1), 21–27.

    Cameron, D., & Anderson, T. (2006). Comparing weblogs to threaded discussion tools in online educational contexts. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(11), 3–15.

    Catts, R., & Lau, J. (2008).Towards information literacy indicators. UNESCO: Paris. Retrieved June 20, 2011 , from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001587/158723e.pdf

    Chartered Institute of Literacy and Information Professionals (2004).CILIP information literacy : Definition. London: CILIP. Retrieved November 20, 2010 , from:http://www.cilip.org.uk/get-involved/advocacy/learning/information-literac y/Pages/definition.aspx

    Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010).A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computer and Education. 54(1), 289–297.

    Chu, S. K. W., Chan, C. K. K., & Tiwari, A. F. Y. (2012). Using blogs to support learning during internship. Computers & Education, 58, 989-1000.

    Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of Web 2.0: using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 179–183.
    Clyde, L. A. (2005). Educational blogging. Teacher Librarian, 32(3), 43–45.

    Deng, L., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers & Education, 56(2), 441–451.

    Downes, S. (2004). Educational blogging. Edu cause Review, 39(5), 14–26.

    Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.

    Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000).Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.

    Du, H. S., & Wagner, C. (2006). Weblog success: exploring the role of technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), 789–798.

    Du, H. S., & Wagner, C. (2007). Learning with weblogs: enhancing cognitive and social knowledge construction. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50(1), 1–16.

    Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Support and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.

    Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Brillant, M., & Prosser, M. (2008). Student experiences of problem-based learning in pharmacy: conceptions of learning, approaches to learning and the integration of face-to-face and on-line activities. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(5), 675–692.

    Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O’Hara, A. (2006). How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussion: conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(4), 244–256.

    Ellison, N., & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: a preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 99–122.

    England, L., Fatzinger-McShane, P., Scarpero, C., & Stapley, D. (2008). Intern blog: an innovative approach to market and reform. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 108, 17.

    Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argu- mentive discourse skills. Discourse Processes, 32, 135-153.

    Ferdericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., Swan, K., & Shea, P. (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. In Proceedings of the 1999 sloan summer workshop on asynchronous learning networks.

    Flatley, M. E. (2005). Blogging for enhanced teaching and learning. Business Communication Quarterly, 68, 77–80.

    Goktas, Y. & Demirel, T. (2012). Blog-enhanced ICT courses: Examining their effects on prospective teachers’ ICT competencies and perceptions. Computers & Education, 58, 908–917.

    Goktas, Y. (2009). Incorporating blogs and the seven principles of good practice into preservice teacher ICT courses: a case study. The New Educational Review, 19(3–4), 29–44.

    Homik, M., & Melis, E. (2006).Using blogs for learning logs. Paper presented at the ePortfolio, Oxford UK. Retrieved from http://www.activemath.org/pubs/Homik-ep2006.pdf
    ..

    Hourihan, M. (2002). What we're doing when we blog. Retrieved December, 31, 2003, from: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/javascript/2002/06/13/megnut.html

    Hwang, G. H., Chu, H. G., Lin, Y. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). A knowledge acquisition approach to developing mindtools for organizing and sharing differentiating knowledge in a ubiquitous learning environment. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1368–1377.

    Hwang, G. J., Shi, Y. R., & Chu, H. C. (2011). A concept map approach to developing collaborative mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 778–789.

    Hwang, G. J., Tseng, J. C. R. & Hwang, G. H. (2008). Diagnosing student learning problems based on historical assessment records. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(1), 77–89.

    Jacobsen, H. E. (2006). A comparison of on-campus first year undergraduate nursing students’ experiences with face-to-face and on-line discussions. Nurse Education Today, 26, 494–500.

    Jansen, B. J., Booth, D., & Smith, B. (2009).Using the taxonomy of cognitive learning to model online searching. Information Processing and Management, 45, 643–663.

    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Professional development in cooperative learning: short-term popularity vs. long-term effectiveness. Cooperative Learning, 14, 52–54.

    Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.

    Jonassen, D. H., & Carr, C. S. (2000). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.).Computers as cognitive tools. No more walls (Vol. 2, pp. 165–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawlence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C., & Yueh, H. P. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 24–32.

    Kim, J. (2013). Influence of group size on students’ participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 62, 123–129.

    Krause, S. (2004).When blogging goes bad: a cautionary tale about blogs, email lists, discussion, and interaction. Kairos, 9(1), Retrieved from. http://english.ttu.edu/Kairos/9.1/praxis/krause/.

    Lankshear, C. &Knobel, M. (2003). New Literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Lee, S. W. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2011a). Identifying patterns of collaborative knowledge exploration in online asynchronous discussions. Instructional Science, 39, 321–347.
    Levy, M. (2009). Web 2.0 implications on knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13, 120–134.

    Luehmann, A. L. (2008). Using blogging in support of teacher professional identity development: a case study. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 287–337.

    Luppicini, R. (2007). Review of computer mediated communication research for education. Instructional Science, 35, 141–185.

    Lynch, K. and Warnod, H. (2001). Collaborative Integrated Unit and Communication Project. ICT in Education, 24(1), 45–52.

    Mason, R. O. (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age. Mis Quarterly, 10(1), 5-12.

    McGrath, H. & Noble, T. (2005). Eight Ways At Once. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.

    Panjaburee, P., Hwang, G. J., Triampo, W. & Shih, B. Y. (2010). A multi-expert approach for developingtesting and diagnostic systems based on the concept-effect model. Computers & Education, 55(2), 527–540.

    Partlow, K. M., & Gibbs, W. J. (2003).Indicators of constructivist principles in internet-based courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(2), 68–97.

    Passey, D. (2006). Technology enhancing learning: analysing uses of information and communication technologies by primary and secondary school pupils with learning frameworks. The Curriculum Journal, 17(2), 139–166.

    Patel, J., & Aghayere, A. (2006).Students’ perspective on the impact of a web-based discussion forum on student learning. In Proceedings of the 36th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, Sandiego, CA.

    Raghavan, P., Catherine, R., Ikbal, S., Kambhatla, N., & Majumdar, D. (2010).Extracting problem and resolution information from online discussion forums Management of data. Retrieved December, 31, 2013, from: http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~comad/2010/ResearchTrack/paper%206.pdf

    Reece, G. A., Roberts, C. H., & Khoury, H. Q. (2003). CMS as mindtools for enhancing student engagement in advising and assessment: Lessons learned from design of math advisor. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE international professional communication conference (IPCC 2003) (pp. 314–321). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Romero, C., López M. I., Luna, J. M., & Ventura, S. (2013). Predicting students’ final performance from participation in on-line discussion forums. Computers & Education, 68, 458–472.

    Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1), 1–16.

    Rovai, A. P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 77–88.

    Sidek, E. A. R. & Yunus, M. M. (2012).Students’ experiences on using blog as learning journals. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 135–143.

    Siponen M. T. ; Kajava, I. (2000), Computer ethics-the most vital social aspect of computing: some themes and issues concerning moral and ethical problems of IT. Retrieved December, 31, 2003, from: http://www.ifi.uio.no/iris20/Proceedings/12.htm.

    Stiler, G. M., & Philleo, T. (2003). Blogging and blogspots: an alternative format for encouraging reflective practice among preservice teachers. Education, 123, 789–797.

    Tomei, L. A. (2006). The impact of online teaching on faculty load: computing the ideal class size for online courses. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 531–541.

    Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valke, M. (2006). Curricula and the use of ICT in Education: Two worlds apart? British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(66), 962–976.

    Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.

    Van Eemeren, F. H., &Grootendorst, R. (2003). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach (Vol. 14). Cambridge University Press.

    Wassell, B., & Crouch, C. (2008). Fostering connections between multicultural education and technology: incorporating weblogs into preservice teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 211–232.

    West, R. E., Wright, G., Gabbitas, B., & Graham, C. R. (2006).Reflections from the introduction of blogs and RSS feeds into a preservice instructional technology course. TechTrends, 50(4), 54–60.

    Wrede, O. (2003). Weblog and discourse: Weblogs as a trans for mational technology for higher education and academic research. Blog talk Conference Paper. Retrieved May 8, 2007, fromhttp://weblogs.design.fhaachen.de/owrede/publikationen/weblogs and discourse.

    Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students' reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 18–25.

    Yang, S. H. (2009).Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 11–21.

    Yang, Stephen J. H., Zhang, J., & Chen, I. Y. L. (2008).A JESS-enabled context elicitation system for providing context-aware Web services. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 2254–2266.

    Yen, J. C., Lee, C. Y., & Chen, I. J. (2012).The effects of image-based concept mapping on the learning outcomes and cognitive processes of mobile learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 307–320.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE