研究生: |
黃仲毅 Huang, Chung-I |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
護理人員願意投入和留任醫院執業之工作條件與彈性制度探討 An Exploration of Working Conditions and Flexible System for Hospital Nurses |
指導教授: |
余鑑
Yu, Chien 于俊傑 Yu, Chin-Cheh |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 121 |
中文關鍵詞: | 投入 、留任 、重返 、工作條件 、彈性制度 、彈性人力資源管理 |
英文關鍵詞: | join, retention, return, working condition, flexible system, flexible human resource management |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/DIS.NTNU.DTAHRD.010.2018.F06 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:176 下載:21 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
台灣最近數年來出現嚴重的護理人力短缺現象,各醫院護理主管莫不積極研擬有效的解決策略,解決此問題的策略之一,應先瞭解護理人員期望的工作條件和各項彈性制度需求。
本研究旨在探討護理人員在何種工作條件和彈性制度下,願意投入和留任醫院執業。
第一階段以文獻查證,及焦點團體座談方式,廣泛收集應屆畢業生和現職護理人員願意投入和留任醫院執業的意見,擬定「護理人員工作條件與彈性制度調查表」,並經信效度檢定後,進行第二階段採隨機分層抽樣方式,進行全國性醫院抽樣調查。抽中之24家醫院中,有17家醫院同意參與,共發出問卷1,150份,回收1,146份,回收率99.65%。所蒐集之資料以描述性統計、t檢定、線性回歸、因素分析和ANOVA進行統計分析。
統計分析1,146份問卷結果顯示,護理人員願意投入和留任醫院執業的工作條件和彈性制度包含六大因素,分別為職能、數量、區隔、時間、薪資和領導彈性,共有113項,總平均值為4.35(SD = 0.42),六構面平均值皆在4分以上,表示均具重要性。此外,護理人員之基本屬性中,在醫院層級、醫院所在區域、年齡、學歷、職稱、工作單位和護理總年資與六大構面中之某些構面具有顯著差異。
本研究結果已充分反映護理人員願意投入和留任醫院執業的工作條件和彈性項目,建議醫院高階主管和護理主管能積極創造合適的工作環境、工作條件和彈性制度,期望護理專業團體積極推動本研究結果,並督促政府相關單位提供政策性支持,讓護理人員能有成功的職涯發展,病人也能獲得安全且高品質的照護。
The Taiwanese health care system recently faces new challenges with nursing shortage. The nursing managers seek new strategies to retain nurses, and solve the shortage problem. One strategy is to understand the working conditions and the flexible system with nurses are willing to practice in the hospital.
The purpose of this study is to explore the nurse’s expectations towards their working conditions and a flexible system in the hospitals.
First, a literature review was completed and then focus-group interviews were conducted to collect opinions from new graduates and practical nurses, to develop the questionnaire for the nurses. The focus group interviews were used as foundation for the developed the questionnaire regarding the nurse’s expectations on working conditions and flexible system, and helped strengthen the validity and reliability. Second, we used stratified random sampling to select 24 hospitals in Taiwan. There were 17 hospitals willing to participate in the survey and 1,150 copies of questionnaires were distributed to practical nurses. The valid recovery rate was 99.65% (a total of 1,146 copies were received). The data using descriptive statistics, factor analysis, t-test, linear regression and one-way ANOVA to analyze data.
The results showed 113 objectives of nurse’s expectations concerning working conditions and flexible system, which include 6 factors: task, numerical, divisional, temporal, wages and leading flexibility. The total mean was 4.35(SD=0.50). The mean of 6 types of flexibility were above 4.0. It was the highest degree of importance to nurses. Demographic data on type of hospital, work location, age, education level, work position, work unit and total work years, to the 6 types of flexibility had significant differences.
The study provides evidences for nursing managers and policy makers about the willingness to join and continue to work for Taiwan practical nurses in the hospital. They expect to have good working conditions and a flexible system. The study suggest all nursing managers to create proper work environments, working conditions and a flexible system, and expect the nursing professional organizations to actively promote the results of this study and urged government to provide policy support, in order to encourage successful careers development among nurses, and provide high quality and safety patient care.
一、中文文獻
中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會(2010)。護理人員工作現況調查。全聯護訊,76,1-2。
中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會(2012)。護理人員工作現況調查。台北市:中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會。
中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會(2013a)。醫療機構護理人力現況調查。台北市:中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會。
中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會(2013b)。護理人員工作現況調查。台北市:中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會。
中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會(2014)。醫療機構護理人力現況調查。台北市:中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會。
中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會(2017a)。醫療機構護理人力現況調查。台北市:中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會。
中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會(2017b)。護理人員工作現況調查。台北市:中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會。
台灣醫院協會(2011)。醫事職類薪資統計。台北市:台灣醫院協會。
行政院衛生署(2010)。醫療資訊網-醫事人員管理系統。台北市:行政院衛生署。
行政院衛生署(2012a)。醫療資訊網-醫事人員管理系統。台北市:行政院衛生署。
行政院衛生署(2012b)。護理改革-近中程計畫。台北市:行政院衛生署。
行政院衛生署(2013)。醫療資訊網-醫事人員管理系統。台北市:行政院衛生署。
行政院衛生署(2014)。醫療資訊網-醫事人員管理系統。台北市:行政院衛生署。
成之約(2007)。服務業人力資源彈性運用與管理之研究-以旅館業為例。國立政治大學社會學院勞工研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
成之約(2012)。彈性管理與企業工時制度的規劃。取自http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/14593/1/1.pdf.
李逸(2004)‧公共衛生護理人員工作壓力感受、因應策略與壓力結果之探討─以互動型工作壓力模式為架構。台灣醫誌,23(5),398-405。
李詩敏(2003)。彈性人力運用、組織背景與組織財務績效之關聯¬-以高科技產業為例,未發表之碩士論文,高雄市,國立中山大學。
李河泉(2013)。瞭解Me世代領導密碼。台北市:台北醫學大學。
何慧菁、張淑惠、曹瑞雲、張梅芳、陳永煌、楊燦(2010)。醫院員工工作壓力與身心健康之相關研究。中華職業醫學雜誌,17(4), 239-252。
吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析的應用統計。台北市:知城數位科技。
林威岳(2007)。生產線之生產人力彈性運用探討。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版:高雄。
林秋芬、盧美秀、高靖秋、廖美南、黃仲毅、呂月榮(2012)。護理畢業生未執業人員調查與分析。台北市:行政院衛生署。
扈克勛(2000)。醫院人力資源彈性研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所,未出版:高雄。
陳月里(2012)。彈性工作時間之勞資關係與人力資源管理。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版:桃園。
陳俊賢、吳美容、宋翠葉、林秋芬(2011)。建構優質護理執業環境改善策略。新臺北護理期刊,13(1),43-51。
張媚、余玉眉(2010)。護理人力及專科護理師制度:挑戰與願景。竹南:財團法人國家衛生研究院。
張慧蘭、盧美秀、林秋芬(2010)。應屆畢業新進護理人員離職相關因素之探討。醫護科技學刊,12(3),1-11。
郭淑珍、陳怡君(2010)。失眠與工作壓力:深度訪談使用安眠藥物的女性護理人員。台灣公共衛生雜誌,29(2),131-144。
黃仲毅、盧美秀(2013)。運用彈性人力資源管理解決護理人力短缺問題,領導護理,14(2),10-21。
黃仲毅、盧美秀(2015)。聯結運用轉換型、交易型和真誠領導於護理人員留任.源遠護理,9(1),5-7。
馮兆康、李中一、周秋滿、黃麗玲(2003)。長期照護機構照護人員壓力及社會支持之橫斷性研究。輔仁醫學期刊,1(1),35-46。
趙婉青、袁千邑、王美華、謝碧晴(2008)。護理工作環境現況調查-以台北縣區域教學醫院護理人員為例。亞東學報醫護季刊,28,105-116。
劉雅惠、劉偉文(2009)。護理人員情緒勞務工作壓力與因應行為之相關性。醫護科技期刊,11(2),98-115。
衛生福利部(2017)。台閩地區護理人員統計表-106年2月。台北市:衛生福利部。
衛生福利部(2014.12.18)。研商醫院2015年評鑑基準「三班護病比合理條文」會議記錄。台北市:衛生福利部。
盧美秀、林秋芬、陳玉枝、張文英、高靖秋(2008)。護理人員留任措施輔導計畫。台北市:行政院衛生署委託研究計畫成果報告書。
盧美秀、林秋芬、高日華、黃仲毅、賴甫誌、黃璉華、陳玉枝(2012)。我國優質護理職場醫院指標建構及現況調查。台北市:行政院衛生署。
盧美秀、林秋芬、黃仲毅、張黎露、孫吉珍、高靖秋、楊麗珠、呂月榮、朱唯勤(2013)。護理人力回流計畫:針對重返職場護理人員需求調查和護理人力回流計畫評價以及計畫可行性分析。台北市:衛生福利部。
盧美秀、林秋芬、高日華、黃仲毅、賴甫誌、許麗珠、黃璉華、陳玉枝(2013)。我國優質護理職場醫院指標建構及現況調查。台北市:行政院衛生署。
顏妙芬(2011)。護理人力資源對病患照顧結果之影響(研究計畫編號:DOH98-TD-M-113-97012)。台南市:國立成功大學。
劉雅惠、劉偉文(2009)。護理人員情緒勞務工作壓力與因應行為之相關性。醫護科技期刊,11(2),98-115。
二、英文文獻
Aiken, L. H., Sermeus, W., Van den Heede, K., Sloane, D. M., Busse, R., McKee, M., & Kutney-Lee, A. (2012). Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: Cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States. British Medical Journal, BMJ 2012;344:e1717.doi:10.1136/bmj.
Atkinson, J. (1984). Manpower strategies for flexible organizations. Personnel Management, 16, 28-31.
Barnard, D., Street, A., & Love, A. W. (2006). Relationships between stressors, work supports, and burnout among cancer nurses. Cancer Nursing, 29(4), 338-345.
Blyton, P. (1996).Workforce flexibility. In B. Towers(Ed). The handbook of human resource management. 2nd ed. Oxford:Blackwill.
Cart, A. H., & Friederike, M. (2009). Flexible working time arrangement in Germany. EU: EU Directorate-General Employment and Social Affairs, 5-21.
Drenkard, K., Wolf, G., & Morgan, S. H. (2011), Magnet: The next generation nurse making the difference. Silver Spring, Maryland: American Nursing Credentialing Center.
Hess Jr, R. G. (2004). From bedside to boardroom-nursing shared governance. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 9(1), 2-2.
Janneke, P., & Chantal, R. (2009). Flexibility working time arrangements and gender equality. EU: Publications Office of the European Union.
Kemper, K., Bulla, S., Krueger, D., Ott, M. J., McCool, J. A., & Gardiner, P. (2011). Nurses' experiences, expectations, and preferences for mind-body practices to reduce stress. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 11(1), 26.
Khamisa, N., Oldenburg, B., Peltzer, K., & Ilic, D. (2015). Work related stress, burnout, job satisfaction and general health of nurses. International journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(1), 652-666.
Kim, I. H., Muntaner, C., Shahidi, F. V., Vives, A., Vanroelen, C., & Benach, J. (2012). Welfare states, flexible employment, and health: A critical review. Health Policy, 104(2), 99-127. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.11.002
Lin, C.F., Huang, H.Y., & Lu, M.S. (2013). The development of nursing workforce allocation standards for acute care general wards in Taiwan‧Journal of Nursing Research, 21(4), 298-306. doi:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000002.
MacPhee, M. (2012). Nurse executive symposium: Shaping the future with shared vision. 台北:和信治癌中心醫院。
MacPhee, M. (2013). Healthy work environment. Health Care Practice Environment Workshops. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Taipei Nurse Association, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
Maier, T., & Afentakis, A. (2013). Forecasting supply and demand in nursing professions: impacts of occupational flexibility and employment structure in Germany. Human Resources for Health, 11(24), 1-13. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-24.
McClure, M.L., Poulin, M.A., Sovie, M.D., & Wandelt, M.A. (2010). Magnet hospitals: Attraction and retention of professional nurses. In M. McClure and A.S. Hinshaw (Eds.), Magnet hospitals revisited: Attraction and retention of professional nurses (pp. 103-115). American Nursing Credentialing Center. Silver Spring, Maryland.
North, N., Leung, W., Ashton, T., Rasmussen, E., Hughes, F., & Finlayson, M. (2013). Nurse turnover in New Zealand: Costs and relationships with staffing practises and patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Management, 21(3), 419-428.
Salanova, M., Lorente, L., Chambel, M. J., & Martinez, I. M. (2011). Linking transformational leadership to nurses’ extra-role performance: The mediating role of self-efficacy and work engagement. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(10), 2256-2266.
Salmond, S., & Ropis, P. E. (2005). Job stress and general well-being: A comparative study of medical-surgical and home care nurses. Medsurg Nursing, 14(5), 301.
Schwartz, D. B., Spencer, T., & Wilson, B. (2011), Transformational leadership: Implications for nursing leaders in facilities seeking magnet designation, Official journal of Association of periOperative Registered Nurses(AORN), 93(6), 737-748.
Shacklock, K., & Brunetto, Y. (2011). The intention to continue nursing: work variables affecting three nurse generations in Australia. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(1), 36-46.
Schramm, J. (2009). Work turns flexible. HR Magazine, 54(3), 88.
Shirey, M. R. (2006). Authentic leaders creating healthy work environments for nursing practice. American Journal of Critical Care, 15(3), 255-266.
Thomas, B., Flemming, L., Kongshoj, M.P., & Stine R. (2009). Flexibility and atypical employment in Denmark. Denmark: CARMA Research Paper, 7-16.
Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation Me:Why today`s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled and miserable than ever before. New York:Free Press.
Ulrich, B. T., Buerhaus, P. I., Donelan, K., Norman, L., & Dittus, R. (2005). How RNs view the work environment: Results of a national survey of registered nurses. Journal of Nursing Administration, 35(9), 389-396.
Zeytinoglu, I. U., Denton, M., & Plenderleith, J. M. (2011). Flexible employment and nurses’ intention to leave the profession: the role of support at work. Health policy, 99(2), 149-157.