研究生: |
李宗曄 Lee, Tsung-Yeh |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
學校圖書館及家庭文化資本對閱讀投入及學習成績影響之研究 A Study on the Effect of School Libraries and Family Cultural Capital on Students' Reading Engagement and Learning Achievement |
指導教授: |
陳昭珍
Chen, Chao-Chen |
口試委員: | 陳昭珍 陳雪華 柯皓仁 黃元鶴 林巧敏 |
口試日期: | 2021/07/05 |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
圖書資訊學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 216 |
中文關鍵詞: | 學校圖書館 、閱讀計畫 、閱讀投入 、學習成績 、家庭文化資本 、差異中的差異分析法 、結構方程模型分析 |
英文關鍵詞: | School Libraries, Reading Program, Reading Engagement, Learning Achievement, Family Cultural Capital, Difference-in-Difference Approach, SEM Analysis |
研究方法: | 調查研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101594 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:225 下載:44 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
學校圖書館對學生的學習成績是否有影響,過去在已開發與開發中國家進行的研究其結果往往相左,此為一有趣現象,也是值得不斷被實證與探討的問題。本研究以大陸湖南省雙峰縣十八間偏鄉中小學為研究對象,經兩年的追蹤調查,以獨立樣本t檢定及差異中的差異DID檢定,進行學生的閱讀投入及縣級集中考試之學科成績差異分析;過去研究指出家庭的社會經濟狀態會影響孩童的閱讀與學習成就,其中家庭文化資本更勝於實質財富,本研究也透過SEM結構方程模型分析,了解家庭文化資本與閱讀投入不同構面的關聯,並利用多群組分析來檢定學校圖書館與閱讀計畫是否會對家庭文化資本與閱讀投入的關聯模型產生干擾效果。研究結果發現,設立學校圖書館且進行閱讀計畫的有無,在閱讀投入構面有顯著差異,顯示學校圖書館及閱讀計畫對於培養學生閱讀興趣、閱讀態度及閱讀策略的價值。但在學科成績方面,t檢定有顯著差異,但DID檢定則無一致之顯著差異。家庭文化資本對閱讀動機有顯著的正向影響,而閱讀動機對閱讀行為與閱讀策略也有顯著的正向影響。學校圖書館與閱讀計畫對家庭文化資本與閱讀動機有顯著正向的干擾效果,亦即學校圖書館與閱讀計畫能夠強化家庭文化資本對閱讀動機的正向影響。本研究對象除設立學校圖書館外也同時推動閱讀計畫,研究結果可補充過去在開發中國家進行之相關研究所缺之論述。
Regarding whether school libraries have an effect on students' learning achievement, previous findings in empirical studies are inconsistent across different developing and developed countries. This is an interesting phenomenon, which is still an important research topic that needs to be further tested and explored. In this study, a total of 18 rural primary and secondary schools in Shuangfeng County, Hunan Province were selected as the research subjects. After two years of follow-up survey investigation and data collection, the independent t-test and the difference-in-differences (DID) approach were used to analyze the differences of students' reading engagement and the countywide standardized test scores. Previous studies have pointed out that the socio-economic status of the family will affect children’s reading and learning achievements, in which more impact could be brought by family cultural capital than physical wealth. This study conducted structural equation model (SEM) analysis to understand the relationship between family cultural capital and different dimensions of reading engagement. The multi-group analysis technique was also used to verify the moderation effects of the school library and reading program on the relationship model of family cultural capital and reading engagement.
The result shows that there were significant differences in the aspect of reading engagement between the students at the schools with and without a school library and the reading program. The result also indicates the value of school library and reading program in cultivating students' reading interest, reading attitude, and reading strategies. The t-test reveals that there were significant differences in the aspect of standardized test scores; however, there was no consistent significant difference in DID test. Family cultural capital has a significant positive impact on reading motivation, and reading motivation also has a significant positive impact on reading behavior and reading strategies. School libraries and reading program have a significant positive moderation effect on family cultural capital and reading motivation, that is, school libraries and reading program can strengthen the positive influence of family cultural capital on reading motivation. The intervention in this study included the implementation of a reading program in addition to setting up a physical school library, thus, the results of this study may complement some previous empirical studies conducted in developing countries.
Aaker, D. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (1979). Unobservable variables in structural equation models with an application in industrial selling. Journal of Marketing Research, 147-158.
Abadzi, H. (2007, October). Absenteeism and beyond: Instructional time loss and consequences (Policy Research Working Paper Number 4376). Washington, DC: World Bank Independent Evaluation Group.
Achterman, D. L. (2008). Haves, halves, and have-nots: School libraries and student achievement in California. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of North Texas. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc9800/m2/1/high_res_d/dissertation.pdf
Adams, M.J. ( 1990 ). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Adeyemi, T. O. (2010). The school library and students’ learning outcomes in secondary schools in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Business Management, 2(1), 1-8.
Adkins, D., & Brendler, B. (2015). Libraries and reading motivation: A review of the programme for international student assessment reading results. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 41(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035215578868
Alvarado, E. S., & Adriatico, C. (2019). Reading motivation vis-s-vis academic performance. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(06), 92.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Anderson, R. (2013). Interrogating the American Library Association’s “Core values” statement: Peer to peer review. Library Journal. Retrieved from http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2013/01/opinion/peer-to-peer-review/interrogating-the-american-library-associations-core-values-statement-peer-to-peer-review
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of Structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bagozzi, R., Edwards, J. (1998). A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods 1(1). 45-87.
Baker, L., Afflerbach, P., & Reinking, D. (1996). Developing engaged readers in school and home communities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1991). Self-efficacy mechanism in physiological activation and health-promoting behavior. In J. Madden, IV (Ed.), Neurobiology of learning, emotion and affect (pp. 229- 270). New York: Raven.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5(307-337).
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Baxter, S. J., & Smalley, A. W. (2004). Check it out!: The results of the 2004 school library media program census. Final Report. Metronet.
Borkum, E., He, F., & Linden, L. L. (2013). The effects of school libraries on language skills: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in India. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bourdieu, P. (1986) The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. (pp. 241-258 ). New York, NY: Greenwood.
Bourdieu, P., 1973. Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In: Brown, R. (Ed.), Knowledge, Education, and Cultural Change. Tavistock Publications Limited, London, pp. 71–112.
Bourdieu, P., 1977. Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In: Halsey, A.H. (Ed.), Power and Ideology in Education. Oxford University Press, New York.
Briggs, N. (2006). Estimation of the standard error and confidence interval of the indirect effect in multiple mediator models. The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Brozo, W. G., Shiel, G., & Topping, K. (2007). Engagement in reading: Lessons learned from three PISA countries. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(4), 304-315.
Buckley, J., & Shang, Y. (2002) Estimating policy and program effects with observational data: The “differences-in-differences” estimator, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation: 8, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.7275/dwxt-zv80https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol8/iss1/24
Burton, L. (2007). Childhood adultification in economically disadvantaged families: A conceptual model. Family Relations, 56(4), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00463.x
Chall, J. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cheung, K.-c., Mak, S.-k., Sit, P.-s., & Soh, K.-c. (2016). A typology of student reading engagement: Preparing for response to intervention in the school curriculum. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 48, 32-42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.12.001
Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22 (1), 7-16.
Chiu, M.M. & Chow, W.Y. (2010). Culture, motivation, and reading achievement: High school students in 41 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 579–592.
Chiu, S.I., Hong, F.Y., Hu, H.Y. (2015). The effects of family cultural capital and reading motivation on reading behaviour in elementary school students. School Psychology International, 36(1), 3–17.
Churchill, G. A. Jr,(1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73.
Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H., & Vigdor, J. (2007, November). Are teacher absences worth worrying about in the U.S.? (Working Paper Number W13848). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Connell, J. P., & Klem, A. M. (2006). First things first: A framework for successful secondary school reform. New Directions for Youth Development, 2006(111), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.182
Conner M. & Norman P.(1995). Predicting health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models Open University Press, Buckingham, Englan
Cramer, E., & Castle, M. (Eds.). (1994). Fostering the love of reading: The affective domain in reading education. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Cuesta, A., Glewwe, P., & Krause, B. (2016). School infrastructure and educational outcomes: a literature review, with special reference to Latin America. Economia, 17(1), 95-130.
Curran, Patrick J, West, Stephen G, & Finch, John F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological methods, 1(1), 16.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The right to learn and the advancement of teaching:Research, policy, and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher, 25(6), 5-17.
Darling, S., & Westberg, L. (2004). Parent involvement in children’s acquisition of reading. The Reading Teacher, 57(8), 774-776.
Davies, B. (Ed.). (2009). The essentials of school leadership (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
De Coster, I., Baidak, N., Motiejunaite, A., & Noorani, S. (2011). Teaching Reading in Europe: Contexts, Policies and Practices: ERIC.
De Graaf, N. D., De Graaf, P. M. & Kraaykamp, G. (2000). Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in the Netherlands: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective. Sociology of Education, 73, 92-111.
Dearing, E., Kreider, H. & Weiss, H.B. (2008). Increased family involvement in school predicts improved child-teacher relationships and feelings about school for low-income children. Marriage & Family Review, 43(3), 226-254.
Denissen, J. J. A., Zarrett, N. R., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). I like to do it, I’m able, and I know I am: Longitudinal couplings between domain specific achievement, Eds. & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 933–1002). New York: Wiley.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87–99.
Deschacht, N., & Goeman, K. (2015). The effect of blended learning on course persistence and performance of adult learners: A difference-in-differences analysis. Computers & Education, 87, 83-89.
Deteemers, S., Trautwein, U., & Ludtke, O. (2009). The relationship between homework time and achievement is not universal: Evidence from multilevel analyses in 40 countries. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(4), 375-405.
DiMaggio, P. & Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and marital selection. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1231-1261.
Doll, W. J., Raghunathan, T.S., Lim, J. S., & Gupta, Y. P. (1995). A confirmatory factor analysis of the user information satisfaction instrument.
Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 18 (4), 453-461.
Donahue, P. L., Daane, M. C., & Grigg, W. S. (2003). NAEP Reading Highlights. Editorial Note, 5(4), 40.
Dow, M. J., & McMahon-Lakin, J. (2012). School librarian staffing levels and student achievement as represented in 2006-2009 Kansas annual yearly progress data. School Library Research, 15.
Dumais, S. A. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school success:The role of habitus. Sociology of Education 75, 44-68.
Ehri, L. (1995). The emergence of word reading in beginning reading. In P. Owen & P. Pumfrey (Eds.), Children learning to read: International concerns (Vol. 1) (pp. 9-31). London: Falmer Press.
Erberber, E. (2009). Analyzing Turkey’s data from TIMSS 2007 to investigate regional disparities in eighth grade science achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Fritz, M. S., MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233-239.
Gottfried, A. W., Cook, C. R., Gottfried, A. E., & Morris, P. E. (2005). Educational characteristics of adolescents with gifted academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal investigation from school entry through early adulthood. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(2), 172–186, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900206.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (1998). Role of cognitively stimulating home environment in children’s academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 69(5), 1448À1460, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1132277.
Greenwald, R., Hedges, L.V., & Laine, R.D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361-396.
Guthrie, J. T. (2001). Contexts for engagement and motivation in reading. Reading Online, 4(8). Retrieved from: http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=/articles/handbook/gu thrie/index.html
Guthrie, J. T. (2003). Concept-oriented reading instruction: Practices of teaching reading for understanding. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Ed.), Rethinking Reading Comprehension (pp. 115-140). Guilford Press.
Guthrie, J.T., & Anderson, E.(1999).Engagement in reading:Process of motivated, strategic, knowledgeable, social readers.In J.T. Guthrie & D.E. Alvermann(Eds.), Engaged reading:Process, practices, and policy implications(pp.17-45). New York:Teachers College Press.
Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2014). Effects of classroom practices on readingcomprehension, engagement, and motivations for adolescents reading. Research Quarterly, 49(4), 387-416.
Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A.(1997). Relations of Children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420-432.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Guthrie, J. T., Alao S., Rinehart J.M.(1997).Engagement in reading for young adolescents.Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,40(6), 438-446.
Guthrie, J. T., Anderson, E., Alao, S., & Rinehart, J. (1999). Influences of concept-oriented reading instruction on strategy use and conceptual learning from text. The Elementary School Journal, 99(4), 343-366.
Guthrie, J. T., Cambria, J., & Wigfield, A. (2008). Motivations for reading information books school questionnaire (MRIB-S) and motivations for reading information books nonschool questionnaire (MRIB-N). Retrieved from http://www.cori.umd.edu/measures/MRIB-S.pdf
Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 282-313.
Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L, & Ho, A. N. (2013). Modeling the relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 9-26.
Guthrie, J. T., McGough, K., Bennett, L., & Rice, M. E. (1996). Concept-oriented reading instruction: An integrated curriculum to develop motivations and strategies for reading. Developing engaged readers in school and home communities, 165-190.
Guthrie, J.T., Van Meter, P., McCann, A.D., & Wigfield, A. (1996). Growth of literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 306-332. doi:10.1598/RRQ.31.3.5
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601-634). Springer US.
Hair, Jr. J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R, L. & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hair, Jr. J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R, L. & Black, W. C. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Haycock, K. (1995a). Research in teacher-librarianship and the institutionalization of change. School Library Media Quarterly, 23(4), 227-233.
Haycock, K. (1995b). Research imperatives for information professionals: Developing foundations for effectiveness. School Library Media Annual, 13, 113–126.
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
Howie, S. (2007). South Africa. In I.V.S Mullis, M.O. Martin, A.M. Kennedy, & K.L. Trong (Eds.), PIRLS 2006 encyclopedia: A guide to reading education in the forty PIRLS 2006 countries (pp. 381-392). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Hughes, H., Bozorgian, H., Allan, C., & Dicinoski, M. (2013). School libraries, teacher-librarians and their contribution to student literacy development in Gold Coast schools: Research report. School Library Association of Queensland, Queensland University of Technology. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/60260/
IEA (2016). School Composition and Resources: size of school library. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://pirls2016.org/pirls/school-composition-and-resources/school-library/
IFLA School Libraries Section Standing Committee. (2015). IFLA school library guidelines. https://repository.ifla.org/handle/123456789/58
Jerrim, J., & Moss, G. (2019). The link between fiction and teenagers’ reading skills: International evidence from the OECD PISA study. British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3498
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1992). LISREL VIII: Analysis of linear structural relations. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
Kaplan, David. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Sage Publications.
Kenny, D. A. (2006). Series editor’s note. In T. A. Brown (Ed.), Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (pp. ix–x). New York: Guilford.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Ko, H. W., & Chan, Y. L. (2009). Family factors and primary students ’ reading attainment: A Chinese community perspective. Chinese Education and Society, 42(3), 33-48.
Kolenikov, S., & Bollen, K. A. (2008). Testing Negative Error Variances: Is a Heywood Case a Symptom of Misspecification. Sociological Methods and Research 41(1), 124-167.
Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading. 2nd. Ed. Englewood, CO: Libraries unlimited.
Krashen, S. (2009). Anything but reading. Knowledge Quest, 37(5), 18-25. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/194730243?accountid=14228
Krashen, S. (2011). Free voluntary reading. ABC-CLIO.
Krashen, S. (2016). The Purpose of Education, Free Voluntary Reading, and Dealing with The Impact Of Poverty. School Libraries Worldwide, 22(1), 1-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14265.22.1.001
Krashen, S., Lee, S., & McQuillan, J. (2012). Is the Library Important? Multivariate Studies at the National and International Level. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 8(1), 26-36.
Kuon, T., Flores, J., & Pickett, J. (2014). The biggest classroom in the building. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(7), 65-67.
Lance, K. C. & Kachel D. E. (2018 ) Why school librarians matter: What years of research tell us. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(7), 15-20.
Lance, K. C., & Schwarz, B. (2012). How Pennsylvania school libraries pay off: Investments in student achievement and academic standards. Online Submission.
Lance, K. C., Rodney, M. J., & Hamilton-Pennell, C. (2000). How School Librarians Help Kids Achieve Standards: The Second Colorado Study.
Lance, K. C., Rodney, M. J., & Hamilton-Pennell, C. (2001). Good schools have school librarians: Oregon school librarians collaborate to improve academic achievement. Oregon Educational Media Association.
Lance, K. C., Rodney, M. J., & Hamilton-Pennell, C. (2005). Powerful libraries make powerful learners: The Illinois study. Illinois School Library Media Association.
Lee, J-S., & Bowen, N. K. (2006), Parent Involvement, Cultrual Capital, and the Achievement Gap among Elementary School Children. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 193-218.
Lee, J., & Barro, R.J. (2001). Schooling quality in a cross-section of countries. Economica, New Series, 68(272), 465-488.
Lim, H. J., Bong M., & Woo Y. K. (2015). Reading Attitude as a Mediator Between Contextual Factors and Reading Behavior. Teachers College Record, 117(1), 1–36.
Lonsdale, M. (2003). Impact of school libraries on student achievement: A review of the research. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED482253
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate BehavioralResearch, 39, 99-128.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S.G.,& Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1),83-104.
Marzano, R.J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B.A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McCracken, R. A., & McCracken, M. J. (1978). Modeling Is the Key to Sustained Silent Reading. The Reading Teacher, 31(4), 406–408. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20194551
Miller, R., Murnane, R., & Willett, J. (2007). Do teacher absences impact student achievement? Longitudinal evidence from one urban school district (Working Paper Number W13356). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Mol, S.E. & Bus, A.G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta‐analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137 (2), 267 – 296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890.
Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2015). PIRLS 2016 Assessment Framework (2nd ed.). Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2016/framework.html
Mullis, I.V.S. , Martin, M.O., Kennedy, A.M., Trong, K. L., & Sainsbury, M. (2009). PIRLS 2011 Assessment framework. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, E.J., & Kennedy, A.M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 international report: IEA’s study of reading literacy achievement in primary school in 35 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Kennedy, A.M., & Foy, P. ( 2007 ). PIRLS 2006 international report: IEA ’s progress in international reading literacy study in primary schools in 40 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
National Education Association. (2008). Parent, family, community involvement in education (Policy Brief No. 11). Washington, DC: Author.
OECD (2003). PISA2000 result: executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/2960581.pdf
OECD (2010b). PISA 2009 result: executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf
OECD (2010c). PISA 2009 result: learning to lean. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/48852630.pdf
OECD (2010a). PISA2009 assessment framework: key competencies in reading,mathematics and science. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en.
OECD (2021). 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en.
OECD & Statistics Canada. (1995). Literacy, economy, and society: Results of the first international adult literacy survey. Paris; Ottawa, ON: Authors.
Öztürk, M. B., & Aydogmus, M. (2021). Relational Assessment of Metacognitive Reading Strategies and Reading Motivation. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(1), 357–375.
Povey R., Conner M., Sparks P., James R.,& Shepherd R.(2000).Application of the theory of planned behaviour to two dietary behaviours: roles of perceived control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Health Psychology, 5 , pp. 121-139, 10.1348/135910700168810
Robinson, V.M.J. (2007). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why (ACEL Monograph Series No.41). Winmalee, NSW, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Leaders Inc.
Rodney, M. J., Lance, K. C., & Hamilton-Pennell, C. (2003). The impact of Michigan school librarians on academic achievement: Kids who have libraries succeed. Library of Michigan.
Room to Read. (2015). Room to Read’S School Libraries Improve Reading Habits - Room to Read. Retrieved from https://www.roomtoread.org/the-latest/room-to-read-s-school-libraries-improve-reading-habits/
Satorra, Albert, &Bentler, Pete M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis.
Satorra, Albert, &Bentler, Peter M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the American Statistical Association.
Schaffner Ellen, Schiefele Ulrich, & Ulferts Hannah. (2013). Reading Amount as a Mediator of the Effects of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Reading Motivation on Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 369–385.
Schleicher, A., Zimmer, K., Evans, J., & Clements, N. (2009). PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. OECD Publishing (NJ1).
Segars, A. H. (1997). Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega, 25(1), 107-121.
Shehzad, M. W., Lashari, T. A., Lashari, S. A., & Hasan, M. K. (2020). The Interplay of Self-Efficacy Sources and Reading Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Metacognitive Reading Strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 523–544.
Sherblom, S.A., Marshall, J.C., & Sherblom, J.C. (2006). The relationship between school climate and math and reading achievement. Journal of Research in Character Education, 4(1&2), 19-31.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445.
Small, R. V., Shanahan, K. A., & Stasak, M. (2010). The impact of New York‘s school libraries on student achievement and motivation: Phase III. School Library Research, 13, American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/aasl/slr/volume13/small-shanahan-stasak
Smith, E. G. (2001). Texas school libraries: standards, resources, services, and students' performance. Austin: Texas State Library and Archives Commission. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED455850.pdf
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Aysmptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 290-212). San Francisco: Jossey-Boss.
Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. In N. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 159-186). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
Soemer, A., & Schiefele, U. (2018). Reading amount as a mediator between intrinsic reading motivation and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 1-11.
Sprietsma, M. (2012). Computers as pedagogical tools in Brazil: a pseudo-panel analysis. Education Economics, 20(1), 19-32.
Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some con- sequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
Suryadarma, D., Suryahadi, A., Sumarto, S., & Rogers, F. H. (2006). Improving student performance in public primary schools in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Education Economics, 14(4), 401-429.
Swan, E. A. (2003). Concept-oriented reading instruction: Engaging classrooms, lifelong learners. The Guilford Press.
Taylor, B.M., Pearson, P.D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-grade reading instruction in low-income schools. The Elementary School Journal, 101(2), 121-165.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Todd, R. J. (2007). School administrators’ support for school libraries: The impact on student academic achievement. Learning and Media, 35(1), 13-16.
Todd, R. J., & Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Student learning through Ohio school libraries. OELMA.
Tonne, I., & Pihl, J. (2012). Literacy education, reading engagement, and library use in multilingual classes, Intercultural Education, 23(3), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2012.701424
Tramonte, L., & Willms, J. D. (2010). Cultrual capital and its effects on education outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 29, 200-213.
Trong, K.L. (2009). Using PIRLS 2006 to measure equity in reading achievement internationally. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College.
United States National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. (2008).Schools that work! (3rd ed.). Retrieved November 17, 2008, from http:// www2. scholastic.com/content/collateral_resources/pdf/s/slw3_2008.pdf
Van Diepen, M., Verhoeven, L., & Aarnoutse, C. (2008, September). Determinants of reading literacy in industrialized societies. Paper presented at the 3rd IEA International Research Conference, Taipei, Chinese Taipei.
Verhoeven, L. ( 2002 ). Sociocultural and cognitive constraints on literacy development. Journal of Child Language, 29, 484-88.
Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 59-68.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1995). Dimensions of children’s motivations for reading: An initial study. Reading Research Report, 34. National Reading Research Center. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED384010.pdf
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420-432.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie J. T. (2000). "Engagement and motivation in reading." Handbook of reading research 3 (2000): 403-422.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Reading Engagement Index (REI). Retrieved from http://www.cori.umd.edu/measures/REI.pdf
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R.W., & Kean, P.D. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & R.M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & N. Eisenberg (Volume Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, 6th Edition, Vol. 3, Social, Emotional and Personality Development (pp. 933–1002). New York: Wiley.
Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K.C., Taboada, A., Klauda, S.L., Mcrae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the schools, 45(5), 432-445.
Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Tonks, S., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Children's motivation for reading: domain specificity and instructional influences. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 299-309.
Williams, D. A., Wavell, C., & Coles, L. (2001). Impact of school library services on achievement and learning: Critical literature review of the impact of school library services on achievement and learning to inform the work of the DfES Task Group set up to implement actions contained in the government’s response to “Empowering the Learning Community”. Aberdeen: Robert Gordon University. https://www.rgu.ac.uk/3AC6AB20-595B-11E1-BF5B000D609CB064
Williams, D., Wavell, C., & Morrison, K. (2013). Impact of school libraries on learning. Critical review of publish evidence to inform the Scottish education community. Aberdeen: Robert Gordon University. https://openair.rgu.ac.uk/handle/10059/1093
Williams, J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 23-51.
Zhao, M., & Glewwe, P. (2010). What determines basic school attainment in developing countries? Evidence from rural China. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 451-460.
Zimmerman, B. J., Banudra, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 663-676.
于斌斌 (2013)。國外中小學圖書館對學生學習表現的影響研究綜述」。中國圖書館學報, 2013 (05),98-108。
于斌斌、楊利清(2013)。中學圖書館利用對中學生學業表現的影響研究—以蘇州市A中學為案例。圖書情報工作,57 (12),60-66。
巫文娟 (2017)。閱讀投入與學習成效關聯之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。
宋曜廷、劉佩雲、簡馨瑩(2003)。閱讀動機量表的修訂及相關因素研究。測驗學刊,50,47-72。
李宗曄、陳昭珍、梁偉明、梁鴻栩 (2021)。學校圖書館對學生閱讀投入及學科成績影響之研究:以湖南雙峰縣偏鄉小學為例。教育資料與圖書館學,58(1),7-46。https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.202103_58(1).0057.RS.AM
希望閱讀(2013)。閱讀,帶來改變的力量。上網日期:2017年5月30日,取自http://reading.cw.com.tw/Controller?event=READDOC&docid=2000004
張文靜、辛濤(2012)。閱讀投入對閱讀素養影響的跨文化比較研究——以 PISA 2009 為例。心理發展與教育 2,175-183。
張芳全、王平坤(2012)。新移民子女與非新移民子女的文化資本、 閱讀動機與閱讀行為之研究。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,26(1),55-89。
張貴琳(2014)。青少年線上閱讀素養表現之關聯變項探討。市北教育學刊, 45,29-68。
林吟燕(2016)。概念導向閱讀教學融入國中小閱讀課程影響學生閱讀投入之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
林清山、程炳林(1995)。國中生自我調整學習因素與學習表現之關係暨自我調整的閱讀理解教學策略效果之研究。教育心理學報,28,15-58。
范熾文、黃榮隆(2008)。從政策執行觀點談兒童閱讀之落實。師說(204), 28-33。
陳昭珍、林吟燕、陳雅萍、高榛澧、張羽芳、梁鴻栩(2017)。概念導向閱讀教學(CORI) 對國中生閱讀投入影響之研究。圖書資訊學研究,12 (1),37-78。
陳德懷、明日閱讀研究團隊 (2016)。明日閱讀:明日主題學習的基礎。天下雜誌出版,台北市。
陶禛(2016)一般地區與偏遠地區國中生之家庭文化資本與閱讀投入關係研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
樊家忠(2018),尋找平行世界-Differences-in-Differences 之方法與應用,會計審計論叢,8 (1),1-13。
閱讀夢飛翔文化關懷慈善基金網站。https://readingdreams.org.hk
駱淑萍(2014)。亞洲華僑青年閱讀投入度之比較研究─以國立臺灣師範大學 僑生先修部學生為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
温红博、梁凯丽、刘先伟(2016)。家庭环境对中学生阅读能力的影响: 阅读投入、阅读兴趣的中介作用。心理学报,48 (3),248-257。
賴苑玲 ( 2007 )。從推廣閱讀活動檢視彰化市國小六年級學童閱讀行為與圖書館館藏使用之研究。社會科學教育研究。12,1-40。