現今為資訊爆炸的時代，教學過程中的知識概念因其抽象與複雜特性，導致學習者要建立脈絡的過程變得困難，甚至可能影響學習興趣與動機。近年來，教學設計上結合了更多元的資訊呈現方式。然而這些研究大多強調單一面向，例如擴增實境工具強調視覺表徵，遊戲化工具強調動手操作，小組討論工具強調口說表達與聆聽。近年來，跨媒體的設計越來越多，學習活動已經從單一面向，轉變為多面向的設計。因此，本研究提出一「多感官學習模式」，並以桌遊卡牌為基礎，從認知、情意、統整反思三個面向，強調視覺、觸覺、聽覺與口說的結合。具體而言，在系統實作上，本研究以擴增實境科技輔助視覺表徵，建立基礎認知；以桌遊動手操作知識內容，維持學習動機與興趣；以同儕討論強化知識整合，促進形成統整反思策略，期望能透過多感官的學習體驗，提升學習成效並建立良好的動機。
為了評估上述「多感官學習模式」的影響，本研究以「臺北高校」歷史知識做為學習內容，探討以下三個研究問題：（1）在此模式下是否可以提升學習成效；（2）在此模式下是否可以建立良好學習動機；（3）此模式下學習者的成效與動機之群集分析為何。研究對象為臺北市某大學學生25人，參與七十分鐘的活動，依序參與AR卡牌探究、小組桌遊、同儕統整反思，並以分群技術，透過先備知識(前測成績)、學習成就(後測成績)、學習動機(注意、關聯、信心、滿足)分群，探討此「多感官學習模式」帶來的影響。
研究結果顯示：(1)學習成效在活動結束後有顯著提升；(2)參與者也維持中等學習動機；(3)群集分析方面，結果顯示學習者大致可以分為三組：其一、「低先備中動機組」人數最多，其特性是學習動機中等，學習成就最高，進步幅度也最大；其二、「中先備高動機組」人數次之，其特性是學習動機最高，學習成就中等，進步幅度也為中等；其三、「高先備低動機組」人數最少，其特性是動機偏低，雖然學習成就高，但先備知識高，進步幅度最低。綜合上述研究結果，結合AR、桌遊與同儕討論的「多感官學習模式」有助於提升學習成效與動機，且似乎更適合低先備知識的學生。

Nowadays, the amount of knowledge is large. The knowledge concepts are related and hierarchical, making the establishment of knowledge concepts difficult. And, it might even affect the motivation and interest of learning. In recent years, the design of learning and teaching provides more diversified information presentation methods. However, these researches are mostly emphasis on single sensory, for example, augmented reality(AR) focus on visual representation, gamified learning tools emphasized hands-on activities, group discussion stands for speaking and listening practice. Nowadays, there are more and more cross-media design, which make the learning activities change from single model to multiple perspectives. Therefore, this study designs a “multi-sensory learning model” based on cards, aim to assist cognitive domain, affective domain and meta-cognition in learning. This model combines augmented reality, board games, and group discussion. With these three, the learning process can be emphasized on the combination of visual input, hands-on and oral output. Through the aim of technology, knowledge can be present in different kinds and provide visual presentations to build basic knowledge. And the board games are able to strengthen the learning motivation through hands-on activities. While peer discussion, integration and reflection make it possible for learners to elaborate knowledge and meta-cognition strategies.
To evaluate the influence of the multi-sensory learning model, this study takes the historical knowledge of Taihoku higher school as learning context, discuss the following research questions: (1) Through the multi-sensory learning model, whether the learning effectiveness can be improved; (2) Through the multi-sensory learning model, whether the learning motivation; (3) Analyze the learning modalities of different prior knowledge, through the multi-sensory learning model. The participant of this study are 25 college students in Taipei. In the 70 minutes learning process, learners experienced augmented reality, board game and group discussion in order. And this study discussed the influence of the multi-sensory leaning model with ANOVA and cluster through prior knowledge (pre-test), learning effectiveness (post-test) and ARCS motivation questionnaire.
The result indicated that: (1) The learning effectiveness in this learning model is statistically significant. (2) The learning motivation in this learning model is higher than average. (3) Analyze the learning modality, learners can be divided into three groups. First, numbers of learners with low prior knowledge is the most. And they tend to have higher learner learning motivation, get higher score on post-test and progressed the most. Secondly, learners with middle level of prior knowledge tend to get the highest learning motivation, while the learning effectiveness and learning progress is also in medium. Last, learners with higher prior knowledge are very few. The feature is that relatively low in learning motivation. Though learning effectiveness is high , the improvement is low. According to above, the multi-sensory model combining AR, board game and integration can improve learning effectiveness and motivation, and tend to be more suitable for learners who with low prior knowledge.

王金國(2000)。簡介小組討論教學法。教育研究, 8, 137-147。
王怡萱(2020)。探究應用擴增實境輔助國文寫作教學之模式。教育傳播與科技研究, (123), 59-75。
林含諭 (2017)。資訊科技應用於適性化學習的教學策略之探討研究。臺灣教育評論月刊, 6(6), 142-145。
汪栢年 (2009)。 概念構圖與高中歷史教學: 以 [臺灣經濟的起飛] 與 [世界文明的交匯] 為例。歷史教育, (15), 119-151。
李來春、郝光中(2013)。擴增實境應用於互動式英語教材教學之研究-以國小五年級英語三個單元為例。國際數位媒體設計學刊, 5(1), 51-64。
岳修平、鐘婉莉(2005)。專題式學習小組網路溝通互動之研究。教育學刊, (25), 1-23。
金觀濤 (2011)。數位人文研究的理論基礎. 數位人文研究的新視野: 基礎與想像。臺北: 國立臺灣大學出版中心。47-60。
項潔、翁稷安(2011)。 導論—關於數位人文的思考: 理論與方法。數位人文研究的新視野: 基礎與想像》。臺北: 臺大出版中心, 頁, 9-18。
陳姚真、吳宇穎(2008)。多媒體組合方式與知覺偏好對學習結果的影響。教育學刊, (30), 29-60。
陳姚真、吳宇穎(2008)。多媒體組合方式與知覺偏好對學習結果的影響。教育學刊, (30), 29-60。
陳志洪、李佳穎、齊珮芸(2020)。擴增實境輔助拼圖學習系統對學習成效, 學習動機與學習興趣之影響。教育傳播與科技研究, (123), 21-38。
徐綺穗(2010) 。自我解釋學習策略對學生社會學習領域學習統整影響之研究。教育研究學報, 44(1), 49-72。
黃友亭、辜玉旻(2013)。結合自我解釋的閱讀策略教學對國小學童閱讀理解之影響。課程與教學, 16(2), 135-159。
黃麗蓉、賴思儀、楊淑晴(2011)。中學生的歷史概念, 歷史學習態度與歷史批判思考傾向。 Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 24(2), 65-98。
黃國豪、陳碧茵、賴泑伶、蘇宥鋐、曹雅涵(2019)。探討先備知識對競爭遊戲式題庫練習之影響: 以 HTML5 證照輔導為例。數位學習科技期刊, 11(1), 1-22。
張菀珍(2015)。運用擴增實境學習系統輔助大學生地方宗教民俗文化學習成效之探究。數位學習科技期刊, 7(3), 43-81。
張菀珍(2017)。運用擴增實境學習系統支援大學生農村體驗學習之探究。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報, 13(1), 29-64。
張堙森(2017) 。數位桌遊對原住民國小高年級學生臺灣歷史學習成效之設計本位研究－以清領時期為例) 。未出版碩士論文。
張曉洋(2016) 。合作型數位桌遊的開發以及其對於色彩學的學習成效之影響。未出版碩士論文。
許于仁與黃一倚(2017)。探討擴增實境式行動學習在博物館導覽中對學習風格與學習成效之影響。臺灣教育評論月刊, 6(1), 202-222。
趙寧(1998)。概念學習的階層定義與診斷。圖書館學與資訊科學, 24(2)。
蔡浩軒、孟瑛如(2020)。擴增實境 (AR) 之比與比值數學教材對國小六年級學習障礙學生學習及課堂注意力成效提升之探討。特殊教育學報, (51), 65-99。
賴婷鈴、彭素貞(2015)。教育遊戲輔助國中七年級學生提升歷史學習成效之初探。教育傳播與科技研究, (112), 41-49。
錢昭萍、梁麗珍、黃國豪、黃恆霖(2017)。數位繪本或擴增實境融入國文教學對學習之影響: 以科技大學資訊與非資訊學院學生為例。數位學習科技期刊, 9(1), 1-32。
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
Chi, M. T., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive science, 13(2), 145-182.
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational psychology review, 3(3), 149-210.
Chang, C. Y., Chien, Y. T., Chiang, C. Y., Lin, M. C., & Lai, H. C. (2013). Embodying gesture‐based multimedia to improve learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E5-E9.
Fisher, K. M. (1985). A misconception in biology: Amino acids and translation. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 22(1), 53-62.
Gardner, R. (2013, June). Introduction to debriefing. In Seminars in perinatology (Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 166-174). WB Saunders.
Hassett, D. D., & Curwood, J. S. (2009). Theories and practices of multimodal education: The instructional dynamics of picture books and primary classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 63(4), 270-282.
Hsu, H. T., & Lee, I. J. (2020, July). Using augmented reality technology with serial learning framework to develop a serial social story situation board game system for children with autism to improve social situation understanding and social reciprocity skills. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 3-18). Springer, Cham.
Levin, J. R., & Berry, J. K. (1980). Children’s learning of all the news that’s fit to picture. ECTJ, 28(3), 177-185.
Lin, Y. H., & Lin, H. C. K. (2019, December). Using an augmented-reality board game for drug addiction prevention at a University in Taiwan. In International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning (pp. 24-32). Springer, Cham.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and instruction, 12(1), 107-119.
Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
Seligman, M. E., & Isaacowitz, D. M. (2000). Learned helplessness. Encyclopedia of stress, 2, 599-602.
Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 285.
Vinner, S. (1983). Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 14(3), 293-305.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 9(4), 625-636.
Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (1999). School gardening: Improving environmental attitudes of children through hands-on learning. Journal of environmental horticulture, 17(4), 180-184.
Wang, P. Y., Lin, H. T., Wang, S. M., & Hou, H. T. (2019, May). The Development and Evaluation of an Educational Board Game with Augmented Reality Integrating Contextual Clues as Multi-Level Scaffolding for Learning Ecosystem Concepts. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics-Taiwan (ICCE-TW) (pp. 1-2). IEEE International
Wilson, J. M., Goodman, P. S., & Cronin, M. A. (2007). Group learning. Academy of management review, 32(4), 1041-1059.