簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 方志仁
論文名稱: 台灣紫嘯鶇(Myiophoneus insularis)的領域與鳴叫行為
指導教授: 王穎
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 生命科學系
Department of Life Science
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 64
中文關鍵詞: 台灣紫嘯鶇領域活動範圍鳴唱鳴叫
英文關鍵詞: Formosan Whistling Thrush, Myiophoneus insularis, territory, home range, song, call
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:244下載:27
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 台灣紫嘯鶇(Myiophoneus insularis)為廣泛分布於台灣中低海拔溪流環境的特有種鳥類,然而其野外習性仍鮮為人知。2002年10至2004年5月間於烏來及石碇進行本種之無線電追蹤以了解其領域性,並觀察及探討各種鳴叫聲與行為之關連。由石碇觀察的六個領域的個體顯示本種配偶間的活動範圍重疊度大,但與鄰鳥則界線分明,具明顯的領域性,其活動範圍幾乎就是牠的領域。雄鳥維持全功能的終年領域,夜間會回到巢位附近,晨間則在巢位附近鳴唱,且本種利用舊巢的比例很高,推測此類行為之功能與防衛巢位有關,可能有助於來年生殖活動的進行。雌鳥的活動範圍則較不固定。以95%MCP法估計活動範圍達穩定值的3隻個體領域,繁殖期雄鳥為1.89公頃(n=2),雌鳥為3.10公頃(n=1);非繁殖期雄鳥為1.77公頃(n=2),雌鳥為1.14公頃(n=1)。以95% fixed kernel, LSCV估計繁殖期雄鳥的活動範圍為3.25公頃(n=3),雌鳥為3.62公頃(n=1);非繁殖期雄鳥為2.35公頃(n=2),雌鳥為1.42公頃(n=1)。清晨、黃昏時常在溪邊常聽到本種的鳴唱及警戒聲。其鳴唱聲長而複雜多變,就目前觀察僅雄鳥會發出鳴唱聲,平均長度為11.1秒,平均頻域為4.3kHz(n=13)。常見之高頻哨音(警戒聲Ⅰ)具警戒之功能,與許多鳥類的警戒聲相似,其主頻率平均為5.5kHz,長度0.80秒(n=14)。研究期間另記錄到警戒聲Ⅱ、社會性叫聲、幼鳥乞食聲及聯繫聲。繁殖期鳴唱高峰持續時間較非繁殖期長(P<0.01),相較於日出時間繁殖期開始鳴叫的時間較早(P<0.05),與其他共域鳥種比較本種繁殖期開始鳴叫的時間有顯著提早的現象(P<0.05)。本種的鳴唱聲長而頻率廣,且無音節高度重複的現象,相對的易受共域鳥種聲音的阻斷及干擾,推測本種提早鳴叫與避免共域鳥種聲音的干擾有關,可能有助於種內個體的溝通。

    Formosan Whistling Thrush (Myiophoneus insularis) is a widely distributed endemic species near streams in low and med elevation in Taiwan. Very little about its field habit was known. From Oct. 2002 to May 2004, I studied the territoriality of this species by radio-tracking in Wu-Lai and Shi-Ding, and recorded its vocal pattern and behavior. From 6 recorded home ranges at Shi-Ding, they were highly overlapped within pairs and distinctly separated between pairs. Territoriality was found in this species, and the home range was about its territory. Males held all purpose territories year round. They used the area near nest site at dusk, and sang near it at dawn. Besides, there was high probability of old nest reused. Those nest centered activities suggested nest site is very important to the breeding activities of this species. Home ranges of females were less predictable. The home ranges estimated by 95%MCP and 95% fixed kernel, LSCV were 1.89 ha (n=2) and 3.25 ha (n=3) in male, and 3.10 ha (n=1) and 3.62 ha (n=1) in female respectively during breeding season, and 1.77 ha (n=2) and 2.35 ha (n=2) in male, and 1.14 ha (n=1) and 1.42 ha (n=1) in female during non-breeding season. The song and alarm call of this species can usually be heard at dawn and dusk along the streams. Its song was long and elaborate, and only the male was known to sing. The average duration was 11.1 seconds (n=13) and the average frequency range was 4.3 kHz. The alarm call (Ⅰ) was whistles with high frequency. Its average dominant frequency was 5.5 kHz and lasted 0.80 second (n=14). This kind of high frequency whistles is similar to those of many other bird species. Besides, alarm call (Ⅱ), social call, chick begging call, and contact call were also noted. The peak duration of singing activity lasted longer in the breeding season (P<0.01). The timing of the first sound was earlier in the breeding season in comparison with the time of sunrise (P<0.05) and also with other species living in the same area (P<0.05). The characteristic of the song was long in duration and wide in frequency range with very few repeated notes. It may easily be interfered by songs of other coexisting species in the morning which was the peak singing activity of most bird species. That Formosan Whistling Thrush began to sing earlier than other species may be due to the avoidance of acoustic interference, and subsequent advantage in communication with conspecifics.

    中文摘要 …………………………………………………………….Ⅰ 英文摘要 …………………………………………………………….Ⅱ 前言 …………………………………………………………………. 1 研究地區…………………………………………...………………… 6 名詞定義…………………………………………...………………… 7 研究方法………………………………………………...…………… 8 結果………………………………………………...…………………13 討論………………………………………………………...…………21 結論…………………………………………………………………...31 參考文獻 …………………………….……………………………....32 圖 ……………………………….……………………………………40 表 ………..…………………….……………………………………..55 附錄 ………..………………….……………………………………..60

    Alcock, J. 2001. Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach, 7th ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
    Anders, A. D., J. Faaborg, and F. R. Thompson. 1998. Postfledging dispersal, habitat use, and home-range size of juvenile Wood Thrushes. Auk 115:349-358.
    Andersson, S. 1996. Bright ultraviolet colouration in the Asian whistling-thrushes (Myiophonus spp.). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 263:843-848.
    Andersson, S. 1999. Morphology of UV reflectance in a whistling-
    thrush: implications for the study of structural colour signalling in birds. J. Avian Biol. 30:193-204.
    Balsby, T. J. S. 2000. Song activity and variability in relation to male quality and female choice in Whitethroats Sylvia communis. J. Avian Biol. 32:56-62.
    Barclay, R. M. R., M. L. Leonard, and G. Friesen. 1985. Nocturnal singing by Marsh Wrens. Condor 87:418-422.
    Bremond, J. C. 1978. Acoustic competition between the song of the Wren (Troglodytes troglodytes) and the song of other species. Behaviour 65:89-98.
    Brown, D. R., P. C. Stouffer, and C. M. Strong. 2000. Movement and territoriality of wintering Hermit Thrushes in southeastern Louisiana. Wilson Bull. 112:347-353.
    Brown, J. L. 1964. The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. Wilson Bull. 76:160-169.
    Brown, T. J. and P. Handford. 2000. Sound design for vocalizations: quality in the woods, consistency in the fields. Condor 102:81-92.
    Brumm, H. and D. Todt. 2002. Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Anim. Behav. 63:891-897.
    Burt, J. M., S. E. Campbell, and M. D. Beecher. 2001. Song type matching as threat: a test using interactive playback. Anim. Behav. 62:1163-1170.
    Burt, W. H. 1943. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J. Mammalogy 24:346-352.
    Catchpole, C. K. 1972. A comparative study of territory in the Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) and the Sege Warbler (A. schoenobaenus). J. Zool., Lond. 166:213-231.
    Catchpole, C. K. 1980. Sexual selection and the evolution of complex songs among European warblers of the genus Acrocephalus. Behaviour 74:149-166.
    Catchpole, C. K. 1987. Bird song, sexual selection and female choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:94-97.
    Catchpole, C. K., and P. J. B. Slater. 1995. Bird Song:Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge University Press.
    Cody, M. L., and J. H. Brown. 1969. Song asynchrony in neighbouring bird species. Nature 222:778-780.
    Curson, D. R., C. B. Goguen, and N. E. Mathews. 1996. Nest-site reuse in the Western Wood-Pewee. Wilson Bull. 108:378-380.
    Cynx, J., R. Lewis, B. Tavel, and H. Tse. 1998. Amplitude regulation of vocalization in noise by a songbird, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim. Behav. 56:107-113.
    Dabelsteen, T., P. K. McGregor, J. Holland, J. A. Tobias, and S. B. Pedersen. 1997. The signal function of overlapping singing in male robins. Anim. Behav. 53:249-256.
    Delacour, J. 1942. The Whistling Thrushes (Genus Myiophoneus). Auk 59:246-264.
    Fang, J. R., and Y. Wang. 2002. Environmental characteristics of bridges selected by nesting Formosan Whistling Thrush (Myiophoneus
    insularis). BioFormosa 37:17-23.
    Fricken, R. W., M. S. Fricken, and J. P. Hailman. 1974. Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds. Science 183:762-763.
    Fridolfsson, A. K., and H. Ellegren. 1999. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J. Avian Biol. 30:116-121.
    Garson, P. J., and M. L. Hunter. 1979. Effects of temperature and time of year on the singing behaviour of Wrens Troglodytes troglodytes and Great Tits Parus major. Ibis 121:481-487.
    Gentner T. Q. and S. H. Hulse. 2000. Female European starling preference and choice for variation in conspecific male song. Anim. Behav. 59:443-458.
    Gill, F. B. 1995. Ornithology, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
    Gottlander, K. 1987. Variation in the song rate of the male pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca : causes and consequences. Anim. Behav. 35:1037-1043.
    Greenfield, M. D. 1988. Interspecific acoustic interactions among katydids Neoconocephalus: inhibition-induced shifts in diel periodicity. Anim. Behav. 36:684-695.
    Haskell, D. G. 1999. The effect of predation on begging-call evolution in nestling wood warblers. Anim. Behav. 57:893-901.
    Higgins, R. McR. 1979. Temperature related variation in the duration of morning song in the Song Thrush Turdus ericetorum. Ibis 121:333-335.
    Hinde, R. A. 1956. The biological significance of the territories of birds. Ibis 98:340-369.
    Hogstad, O. 1995. Alarm calling by Willow Tits, Parus montanus, as mate investment. Anim. Behav. 49:221-225.
    Hooge, P. N., and B. Eichenlaub. 1999. Animal movement extension to Arcview. ver. 2.04 beta. Alaska Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, AK, USA.
    Hornfeldt, B., T. Hipkiss, A. K. Fridolfsson, U. Eklund, and H. Ellegren. 2000. Sex ratio and fledging success of supplementary-fed Tengmalm’s owl broods. Mol. Ecol. 9:187-192.
    Howard, R. D. 1974. The influence of sexual selection and interspecific competition on mocking bird song (Mimus polyglottos). Evolution 28:428-438.
    Huntsman, B. O. and G. Ritchison. 2002. Use and possible functions of large song repertoires by male Eastern Bluebirds. J. Field Ornithol. 73:372-378.
    Hutchinson, J. M. C., J. M. McNamara, and I. C. Cutchill. 1993. Song, sexual selection, starvation and strategic handicaps. Anim. Behav. 45:1153-1177.
    Hyman, J. 2003. Countersinging as a signal of aggression in a territorial songbird. Anim. Behav. 65:1179-1185.
    Ince, S. A., and P. J. B. Slater. 1985. Versatility and continuity in the song of thrushes Turdus spp. Ibis 127:355-364.
    Kelsey, M. G. 1989. A comparison of the song and territorial behaviour of a long-distance migrant, the Marsh Warbler Acrocephalus palustris, in summer and winter. Ibis 131:403-414.
    Kenward, R. E. 2001. A Manual for Wildlife Radio Tagging. Academic Press, London.
    Kie, J. G., J. A. Baldwin., and C. J. Evans. 1996. CALHOME: a program for estimating animal home ranges. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 24:342-344.
    Klump, G. M., E. Kretzschmar, and E. Curio. 1986. The hearing of an avian predator and its avian prey. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18:317
    -323.
    Langemann, U., B. Gauger, and G. M. Klump. 1998. Auditory sensitivity in the great tit: perception of signals in the presence and absence of noise. Anim. Behav. 56:763-769.
    Lefebvre, G., B. Poulin, and R. McNeil. 1992. Settlement period and function of long-term territory in tropical mangrove passerines. Condor 94:83-92.
    Leopold, A. and A. E. Eynon. 1961. Avian daybreak and evening song in relation to time and light intensity. Condor 63:269-293.
    Logan, C. A., and L. E. Hyatt. 1991. Mate attraction by autumnal song in the Northern Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos). Auk 108:429-432.
    Maher, C. R., and D. F. Lott. 1995. Definitions of territoriality used in the study of variation in vertebrate spacing systems. Anim. Behav. 49:1581-1597.
    Marler, P. 1955. Characteristics of some animal calls. Nature 176:6-8.
    Marler, P., and C. Evans. 1996. Bird call: just emotional displays or something more? Ibis 138:26-33.
    Mennill, D. J., and L. M. Ratcliffe. 2004. Overlapping and matching in the song contests of black-capped chickadees. Anim. Behav. 67:441-450.
    Morse, D. H. 1970. Territorial and courtship songs of birds. Nature 226:659-661.
    Morton, E. S. 1975. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am. Nat. 109:17-34.
    Mountjoy, D. J., and R. J. Robertson. 1988. Nest-construction tactics in the Ceder Waxwing. Wilson Bull. 100:128-130.
    Odum, E. P., and E. J. Kuenzler. 1955. Measurement of territory and home range size in birds. Auk 72:128-137.
    Popp, J. W., R. W. Fricken, and J. A. Reinartz. 1985. Short-term temporal avoidance of interference among forest birds. Auk 102:744-748.
    Powell, R. A. 2000. Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. In L. Boitani, and T. K. Fuller, eds., Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences, 65-110. Columbia University Press, Columbia.
    Pratt, T. K., J. C. Simon, B. P. Farm, K. E. Berlin, and J. R. Kowalsky. 2001. Home range and territoriality of two Hawaiian honey-
    creepers, the Akohekohe and Maui Parrotbill. Condor 103:746-755.
    Pytte, C. L., K. M. Rusch, and M. S. Ficken. 2003. Regulation of vocal amplitude by the blue-throated hummingbird, Lampornis clemenciae. Anim. Behav. 66:703-710.
    Samuel, M. D., and M. R. Fuller. 1994. Wildlife Radiotelemetry. In T. A. Bookhout, ed., Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats, 370-418. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
    Samuel, M. D., D. J. Pierce, and E. O. Garton. 1985. Identifying areas of concentrated use within the home range. J. Anim. Ecol. 54:711-719.
    Seaman, D. E., J. J. Millspaugh, B. J. Kernohan, G. C. Brundige, K. J. Raedeke, and R. A. Gitzen. 1999. Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. J. Wildl. Manage. 63:739-747.
    Severinghaus, L. L. 1996. Territory strategy of the migratory Brown Shrike Lanius cristatus. Ibis 138:460-465.
    Sibley, C.G. and Monroe, B. L. Jr. 1990. Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the world. Yale University Press, New Haven & London.
    Slabbekoorn, H., and M. Peet. 2003. Birds sing at a higher pitch in
    urban noise. Nature 424:267.
    Snow, B. A., and D. W. Snow. 1984. Long-term defence of fruit by Mistle Thrushes Turdus viscivorus. Ibis 126:39-49.
    Staicer, C. A., D. A. Spector, and A. G. Horn. 1996. The dawn chorus and other diel patterns in acoustic signaling. In D. E. Kroodsma, and E. H. Miller, eds., Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, 426-453. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
    Strain, J. G., and R. L. Mumme. 1988. Effects of food supplementation, song playback, and temperature on vocal territorial behavior of Carolina Wrens. Auk 105:11-16.
    Thomas, R. J. 1999a. Two tests of a stochastic dynamic programming model of daily singing routines in birds. Anim. Behav. 57:277-284.
    Thomas, R. J. 1999b. The effect of variability in the food supply on the daily singing routines of European Robins: a test of a stochastic dynamic programming model. Anim. Behav. 57:365-369.
    Thomas, R. J., and I. C. Cuthhill. 2002. Body mass regulation and the daily singing routines of European robins. Anim. Behav. 63:285-
    292.
    Vega Rivera, J. H., C. A. Hass, J. H. Rappole, and W. J. McShea. 2000. Parental care of fledgling Wood Thrushes. Wilson Bull. 112:
    233-237.
    Verner, J. 1977. On the adaptive significance of territoriality. Am. Nat. 111:769-775.
    Walk, J. W., E. L. Kershner, and R. E. Warner. 2000. Nocturnal singing in grassland birds. Wilson Bull. 112:289-292.
    Welty, J. C. 1982. The Life of Birds, 3rd ed. W. B. Sauders College Publishing, Philadephia.
    White, G. C., and R. A. Garrott. 1990. Analysis of Wildlife Radio-
    Tracking Data. Academic Press, San Diego.
    Wiley, R. H. and D. G. Richards. 1982. Adaptions for acoustic communication in birds:sound transmission and signal detection. In D. E. Kroodsma, and E. H. Miller, eds Acoustic Communication in Birds Vol. 1., 131-181. Academic Press.
    中華民國野鳥學會. 1996. 鳥類繫放調查表填表說明. 中華民國野鳥學會鳥類繫放中心.
    王嘉雄,吳森雄,黃光瀛,楊秀英,蔡仲晃,蔡牧起,蕭慶亮. 1991. 台灣野鳥圖鑑. 亞舍圖書有限公司.
    王穎. 1986. 台灣特有亞種鉛色水鶇的生態研究. 師大生物學報21:15-40.
    王穎,孫元勳. 1987. 室內紫嘯鶇社會地位和棲息行為之初步研究. 師大生物學報 22:22-31.
    王穎,裴家騏. 1984. 紫嘯鶇育雛行為之初步研究. 師大生物學報19: 83–92.
    朱悅麗,王穎. 1988. 小白鷺的覓食領域. 師大生物學報 23:167-178.
    張萬福. 1997. 台灣的陸鳥. 中台科學技術出版社. 153頁.
    陳炤杰. 1989. 河烏繁殖領域與棲地關係之研究. 碩士論文. 國立台灣師範大學.
    游淑鈞,袁孝維. 2000. 台灣塔塔加地區金翼白眉生殖生態之研究. 中華林學季刊 33:157-168.
    黃永貴. 2001. 影響台灣燕雀目鳥類鳴唱聲結構之因素. 碩士論文. 國立台灣大學.
    端木茂甯. 2001. 福山試驗林食蟹獴(Herpestes urva)的棲地利用. 碩士論文. 國立台灣大學.
    翟鵬. 1977. 台灣鳥類生態隔離的研究. 碩士論文. 東海大學.
    劉小如. 1986. 台灣藍鵲的取食及生殖習性初探. 台北市野鳥學會年刊. 28-33頁.
    劉良力. 1991. 栗背林鴝之生物學研究. 碩士論文. 國立台灣師範大學.
    蔡航椰. 1980. 紫嘯鶇的築巢位置與育雛行為. 野鳥1: 62–65.
    鄭光美,張正旺,丁平,丁長青,盧欣,張雁雲. 2002. 世界鳥類分類與分布名錄. 科學出版社.
    謝錦煌. 1991. 本省留鳥的蛋和巢之調查報告. 野鳥1:1-7.
    顏重威. 1994. 台灣的野生鳥類(一)留鳥. 渡假出版社. 71-72頁.
    羅柳墀,王穎. 1989. 溪頭地區藪鳥行為的初步研究. 師大生物學報 24:93-105.

    QR CODE