研究生: |
洪暉琇 Hung, Hui-Hsiu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
探討父母教養風格對國中生認知與情意層面創造力之影響 A Study on Influence of Parenting Style on the Cognitive and Affective Creativity of Junior High School Students |
指導教授: |
陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
創造力發展碩士在職專班 Continuing Education Master's Program of Creativity Development |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 108 |
中文關鍵詞: | 教養風格 、創造力 、父母陪伴時間 |
英文關鍵詞: | Parenting style, Creativity, Time with Parent |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.MPCD.003.2018.F02 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:277 下載:36 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
創造力對於現今社會具有重要的意義,許多研究者由環境面向探討創造力,其中家庭被視為是孕育子女創造力的重要場域。許多國外文獻顯示,父母的教養風格與子女的創造力有強烈關聯,然而此效果在東亞地區與國內研究裡則較不明顯,據此,本研究以過去未被列入考量的條件切入,試圖釐清華人與非華人文化圈父母在養育子女上的風格差異,以及對子女創造力之影響路徑。本研究將一些可能影響教養風格-創造力路徑之潛在變項納入探討,包含:控制父母親與學生的背景變項,區辨主、次要教養者,與調查父母直接陪伴子女進行「生活起居」、「非課業活動」、「課業活動」、「管教/教導」、「被規劃/要求參加的活動」之時間,以期能更清楚地瞭解國內家長教養方式與子女創造力之間的關係。本研究採便利抽樣,抽取來自臺灣北、中、南、東、離島五個地區共13校539位國中生參與者,進行主要教養者的教養風格與陪伴時間對創造力影響的施測,研究工具採用父母直接陪伴時間調查表、葉光輝教養風格量表、新編創造思考測驗─圖形測驗、頓悟問題作業、短式五大人格量表。研究結果發現:透過區分主要教養者,父母的教養風格對創造力的影響更顯著,尤以開明權威對創造力的正向效果最佳,寬鬆放任則不利創造力發展。父母親直接陪伴孩子的時間對創造力效果不明顯,但過長的時間(6小時以上)對創造力會造成負向影響。本研究結果應有助於釐清國內家長教養型態、風格與創造力的關係,並根據研究結果提出建議,以期成為後續研究之基礎。
Creativity is of great significance to today. Many researchers explore the environment from the perspective of creativity. The family is seen as an important field for children's creativity. Many foreign literatures show that parental styles of education are strongly related to children’s creativity. However, this effect is less obvious in East Asian and domestic studies. Therefore, this study takes into account conditions that have not been taken into consideration in the past. It seeks to clarify the differences in the styles of parenting between Chinese and non-Chinese cultural parents and their influence on children’s creativity. This study includes some potential variables that may affect the style of education-creativity, including: background variables that control parents and students, district leaders, minor educators, and survey parents who directly accompany children. The time of rearing, non-school activities, school activities, discipline/teaching, and activities planned/required for participation is expected to provide a clearer understanding of the relationship between domestic parenting practices and child creativity. This study used convenience sampling to collect 539 students from 13 schools in five regions of North, Central, South, East, and Outlying Islands in Taiwan, and tested the parenting style of major educators and time with parent on creativity. The research tools used parental time questionnaire, Ye Guanghui's education style scale, new creative thinking test-graphic test, epiphany question assignment, short-term Big-Five personality scale. The results of the study found that: By distinguishing between the major educators, the parental style has a more significant influence on creativity. In particular, ”authoritative parenting” has the best positive effect on creativity, and ”indulgent parenting” is not conducive to the development of creativity. Parents who spend time directly with their children have little effect on creativity, but excessively long hours (more than 6 hours) can have a negative impact on creativity. The results of this study should help clarify the relationship between domestic parenting style and creativity, and make recommendations based on the research results in order to become the basis for subsequent research.
中文文獻
王鍾和(1993)。家庭結構、父母管教方式與子女行為表現(未出版之博士論文)。 國立政治大學,臺北市。
王燕、張雷(2005)。兒童學業自我概念在父母教養風格與學業成就間的中介作用。應用心理學,11(2),186-192。
心理出版社。測驗館-性向測驗【測驗總覽】。取自:http://www.psy.com.tw/ec99/ushop20128/ShowCategory.asp?category_id=118#性向測驗.
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力硏究。臺北市:心理出版社。
朱瑞玲(1984)。青少年心目中的父母教養方式。台灣社會與文化變遷研討會之論文。臺北南港:中央研究院民族學研究所。
朱瑞玲(2013)。從兒童的價值觀、節儉態度到利環境行為:家庭教化的影響。葉光輝(主編):華人的心理與行為:全球化脈絡下的研究反思,222-257。臺北市:中央研究院。
吳靜吉、高泉豐、王敬仁、丁興祥(1981)。拓弄思圖形創造思考測驗指導及研究手冊(甲式)。臺北市:遠流。
吳靜吉、高泉豐、王敬仁、丁興祥(1981)。拓弄思語文創造思考測驗指導及研究手冊(乙式)。臺北市:遠流。
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998)。 新編創造思考測驗研究。臺北市:教育部訓育委員會。
吳靜吉(2002)。華人學生創自料的研究和教育從分享開始。應用心理研究,第15期,92-104。
李乙明、李淑貞譯(2009)。創意力Ⅰ理論(主編:Robert J. Sternberg)。臺北市:五南。
李乙明、李淑貞譯(2009)。創意力Ⅱ理論(主編:Robert J. Sternberg)。臺北市:五南。
李玉如(2010)。頓悟性問題解題經驗對認知改變的影響:以頓悟能力高低為調節變項。國防大學,桃園市。
林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗。臺北市:心理。
林宗鴻(1997)。人格心理學。臺北市:揚智。
林緯倫、連韻文、任純慧(2005):想得多是想得好的前提嗎?探討發散性思考能力在創意問題解決的角色。中華心理學刊,47,211-227。
范梅英(2008)。青少年人格特質、感恩心與幸福感之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
施乃華(2012)。新移民子女與本國籍依班子女的創造力研究-開放性人格特質之中介效果(未出版之博士論文)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
周新富(2006)。家庭教育學-社會學取向。臺北市:五南。
徐安立(2013)。大學生父母教養方式與自尊高低之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
教育部(2003)。創造力教育白皮書-打造創造力國度。臺北市:教育部。
張春興(1996)。 教育心理學。臺北市:東華。
張曉敏(2011)。漢字圖形創造力測驗之發展(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
張景煥、李建全、鄭雪梅、張舜、劉桂榮(2014)。父母教養方式對初中生創造思維的影響:自我概念的中介作用。心理與行為研究,12(2):145-150。
張芳全、王瀚(2014)。新移民與非新移民子女的家庭社經地位、家庭文化資本與家庭氣氛之縱貫性研究。教育政策與制度,10(3):57-94。
許鳳君(2015)。國中班級幽默人物樣貌-人格特質、幽默風格及自我知覺創造力之探尋(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
陳昭儀(1991)。二十位傑出發明家的生涯路。臺北市:心理。
陳昭儀(2008)。傑出音樂家生涯歷程之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,33(2),113-132。
陳昭儀(2013)。臺灣傑出表演藝術家之創造與生涯歷程。臺北市:師大出版中心。
陳學志、彭淑玲、曾千芝、邱皓政(2008)。藉由眼動追蹤儀器探討平均掃視幅度大小與創造力之關係。教育心理學報,39,127-149。
陳龍安、朱湘吉(1999)。創造與生活。臺北市:五南。
陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實務(第六版)。臺北市:心理。
曾千芝(2009)。頓悟性問題解題歷程之眼動分析。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
葉玉珠(2000)。「創造力發展的生態系統模式」及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內 涵分析。教育心理學報,32(1),95-122。
葉玉珠(2005)。創意發展:生育乎?養育乎?教育研究月刊,133,63-74。
郭蘊忻(2007)。父母教養、自我控制、自我韌性與自尊對青少年壓力因應方式之影響研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
楊國樞(1986)。家庭因素與子女行為:台灣研究的評析。中華心理學刊,28(1),7-28。
楊坤原(2001)。創造力的意義及其影響因素簡介。科學教育月刊(239),3-12。
葉光輝(譯)(2012)。 性格心理學:理論與研究(二版)(原作者: A. P. Lawrence, & D. Cervone)。臺北市:雙葉。(原著出版年: 2010)
蔡明富、龔盈涵(2005)。注意力缺陷過動症學生在威廉斯創造力測驗表現之研究。特殊教育與復健學報,13,49- 67。
蔡笑岳、朱雨潔(2007)。中小學生創造性傾 向、智力及學業成績的相關研究。心理發 展與教育,2,36-41。
蔡佩樺(2012)。頓悟經驗融入正念課程設計暨效果評估(未出版之碩士論文)。國防大學,桃園市。
劉先湧(2006)。動作教育學方案對國小學生創造力之影響研究。臺灣運動教育學報,1(1),51-72。
黃曉嵐、胡翠茵、蔡淑君、張芝萱(譯)、潘裕豐(校閱)(2014)。創造力理埨與當代議題面面觀(原作者:James C. Kaufman & Robert J. Sternberg)。臺北市:華騰。
鄭雅婷、孫扶志(2007)。跨文化家庭中主要照顧者之教養方式對幼兒社會行為表現之探究 —以台南市為例。朝陽科技大學人文暨社會學院95學年度學術研究與創作成果發表會,95-82。
鄭永熏、王嘉慧(2015)。心智圖法運用在國語文領域對提昇國小五年級閱讀理解能力和創造力成效之研究。人文與社會學報,3(4),89-124。
薛秀宜、陳利銘、洪佩圓(2006)。人格理論新紀元:人格五因素模式之測驗工具與其研究應用:教育人力與專業發展。研習資訊,23(1),109-118。
蕭佳純(2014)。延宕交叉相關與潛在成長模式在創造力傾向與科技創造力關係間之分析。特殊教育研究學刊,39(2),87-107。
羅樊妮(2004)。父母管教方式、異性交往之親子溝通與青少年異性交往態度之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
鍾仁惠(2005)。國小高年級學童母親教養方式與自我概念之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系研究所(未出版之碩士論文),高雄市。
簡楚瑛(1988),學前教育環境之研究與應用。台南師範學院初等教育學系初等教育學報,1,193-202。
蘇建文(1976)。國中高、低成就學生心目中父母教養態度之分析。教育心理學報,9,21-31。
英文文獻
Apps, P., & Rees, R. (2009). Public economics and the household. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allport, G.W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. Journal of Creative Behavior. 31, 18-31.
Amato, P., & Rivera, F. (1999). Paternal Involvement and Children's Behavioral Problems. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 375–384.
Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., Hollingshead, A. B., & Jacobsohn, G. C. (2005). Revisiting the birth order-creativity connection: The role of sibling constellation. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 67-77. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_6
Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monographs, 4, 1–102. doi: 10.1037/ h0030372
Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Concepual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
Bergen, D. & Mauer, D. (2000). Symbolic Play, Phonological Awareness, and Literacy Skills at Three Age Levels. In: Roskos, KA.; Christie, JF., editors. Play and Literacy in Early Childhood: Research from Multiple Perspectives. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum, 45-62.
Becker, W. C. (1964). Consequences of different kinds of parental discipline. In M. L. Hoffman., &; L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research, 1, 169-208. New York: Russell Stage Foundation.
Berk, LE. (2001). Awakening Children’s Minds: How Parents and Teachers Can Make a Difference. New York: Oxford University Press.
Caspi, A., Roberts, B.W., & Shiner, R. (2005). Personality development. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453-484.
Cattell, R. B. (1965). Personality, role, mood, and situation perception:A unifying theory of modulators. Psychological Review, 70, 1-18.
Chang, J. H., Hsu, C. C., Shih, N. H., & Chen, H. C. (2014). Multicultural Families and Creative Children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(8), 1288-1296. doi: 10.1177/0022022114537556
Chang, Y. L., Chen, H. C., Wu, I. C., Chang, J. H., & Wu, C. L. (2016). Developmental Trends of Divergent Thinking and Feeling across Different Grades for Taiwanese Adolescence between 1990's and 2010's. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 112-128.
Chao, R., K. (1994). Beyond Parental Control and Authoritarian Parenting Style: Understanding Chinese Parenting through the Cultural Notion of Training. Child Development, 65(4), 1111-1119. doi: 10.1111/j.14678624.1994.tb00806.x
Chao, R. K. (2001). Extending research on the consequences of parenting style for Chinese Americans and European Americans. Child Development, 72, 1832-1843.
Chao, R. and Tseng, V. (2002). Parenting of Asians. In M. H. Bornstein (Series ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. 4, Social conditions and applied parenting (2nd ed., pp. 59-93). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., & Sun, Y. (1992). Social reputation and peer relationships in Chinese and Canadian children: A cross-cultural study. Child Development, 62, 1336–1343.
Chen, W. W., & Ho, H. Z. (2012). The relation between perceived parental involvement and academic achievement: The roles of Taiwanese students’ academic beliefs and filial piety. International Journal of Psychology, 47, 315-324.
Claxton, A. F., Pannells, T. C., & Rhoads, P. A. (2005). Developmental trends in the creativity of school-age children. Creativity Research Journal, 17(4), 327–335.
Conger, R., Ebert-Wallace, L., Sun, Y., Simons, R., McLoyd, V., & Brody, G. (2002). Economic Pressure in African American Families: A Replication and Extension of the Family Stress Model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 179–193. PubMed: 11881755.
Coolahan, K., McWayne, C., Fantuzzo, J., & Grim, S. (2002). Validation of a multidimensional assessment of parenting styles for low-income African-American families with preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 356-373.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13.
Dai, D. Y., Tan, X., Marathe, D., Valtcheva, A., Pruzek, R. M., & Shen, J. (2012). Influences of social and educational environments on creativity during adolescence: Does SES matter? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 191-199. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.677338
Davis GA (1992). Creativity is forever. Dubuque, IA:Kendall / Hunt.
Davis-Kean, P. (2005). The Influence of Parent Education and Family Income on Child Achievement: The Indirect Role of Parental Expectations and the Home Environment. Journal of Family Psychology. 19, 294–304. PubMed: 15982107.
Denise de Souza Fleith (2016). Creativity, Motivation to Learn, Family Environment, and Giftedness: A Comparative Study. Psic.: Teor. e Pesq, 32. ISSN 1806-3446.
Dominowski, R. L. & Dallob, P. (1995). Insight and Problem Soving. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.). The Nature of Insight, 33-62. The MIT Press.
Eisenman, R. & Schussel, N. R. (1970). Creativity, birth order, and preference for symmetry. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 275-280. doi:10.1037/h0029008
Fearon D. D., Copeland D., & Saxon F. T., (2013). The Relationship Between Parenting Styles and Creativity in a Sample of Jamaican Children. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 119-128. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2013.752287.
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.
Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Feist, J. & Feist, G. J. (2012). Theories of Personality (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fernández, J. R., Redden, D. T., Pietrobelli, A., & Allison, D. B. (2004). Waist circumference percentiles in nationally representative samples of African-American, European-American, and Mexican-American children and adolescents. The Journal of pediatrics, 145(4), 439-444.
Fletcher, L., Olekalns, M., & Cieri, H. (2001). Cultural differences in conflict resolution: Individualism and collectivism in Asia-Pacific region, Retrieved April 22, 2017, from http://egade.sistema.itesm.mx/investigation/documentos/documontos/4agade_husted.pdf
Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 613–617. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.023
Furnham, A. & Nederstrom, M. (2010). Ability, demographic and personality predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 957–961. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.030
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. NY: Basic books.
George, J. M. & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513-524.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
Gronick, W. S., Gurland, S. T., DeCourcey,W., & Jacob, K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of mothers’ autonomy support: An experimental investigation. Developmental Psychology, 38, 143-155.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford, J.P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ. Creative Education Foundation.
Guilford, J. P. (1988). Some changes in the structure-of-intellect model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(1), 1-4.
Guryan, J., E. & Kearney, M. (2013). Parental Education and Parental Time with Children. NBER Working paper.
Gute, G., Gute, D. S., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). The early lives of highly crative persons: The influence of the complex family. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 343-357.
Haggbloom, S.J. (2002). The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Review of General Psychology, 6(2), 139-152.
Hasanzadeh, R. & Imanifar, P. (2011). The relationship between creativity and self-esteem and academic achievement of adolescents and youth. Journal of Professional Sociology, 1, 55-65.
Ho, D. (1989). Continuity and variation in Chinese patterns of socialization. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51, 149-163.
Howard, C., Boettcher, J. V., Justice, L., Schenk K. D., Rogers, P. L., & Berg, G. A. (2009). Encyclopedia of Distance Learning, Second Edition [Adobe Digital Editions version]. doi: 10.4018/978-1-60566-198-8.
Hsin, A. & Felfe, C. (2014). When Does Time Matter? Maternal Employment, Children’s Time With Parents, and Child Development. Demography, 51(5), 1867-1894. doi:10.1007/s13524-014-0334-5.
Huang, G. H. C. & Gove, M. (2012). Confucianism and Chinese families: Values and practices in education.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science,2(3), 10-15.
Huang, G. H. & Gove, M. (2015). Asian parenting styles and academic achievement: Views from eastern and western perspectives. Education, 135(3), 389-397.
Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 95–105. doi:10.1002/per.1941
Kalenkoski, C. M., Ribar, D. C., & Stratton, L. S. (2007). The effect of family structure on parents’ child care time in the United States and the United Kingdom. Rev Household, 5,353-384.
Kalil, A., Ryan, R., & Corey, M. (2012). Diverging Destinies: Maternal Education and the Developmental Gradient in Time with Children. Demography, 49(4), 1361-1383. doi:10.1007/213524-012-0129-5.
Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1. doi: 10.1037/a0013688
Kelly, K. E. (2006). Relationship between the Five-Factor Model of Personality and the Scale of Creative Attributes and Behavior: A validation study. Individual Differences Research, 4, 299-305.
Kemple, K. M. & Nissenberg, S. A. (2000). Nurturing creativity in early childhood education: Families are part of it. Early Childhood Education Journal, 28(1), 67-71.
Kim, K. H. (2005). Learning from each other: Creativity in East Asian and American education. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 337–347.
Kohler, W. (1925). The Mentality of the Apes. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of creativity (pp.20-47). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Dodge, K. A., Malone, P. S., Oburu, P., & Quinn, N. (2005). Physical discipline and children's adjustment: Cultural normativeness as a moderator. Child Development, 76(6), 1234-1246. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00847.
Leung, N. A., Wong, S., Wong, I., & McBride-Chang, C. (2010). Filial piety and psychosocial adjustment in Hong Kong Chinese early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(5), 651-667. doi: 10.1177/0272431609341046
Li, Y., Costanzo, P. R., & Putallaz, M. (2010). Maternal socialization goals, parenting styles, and social-emotional adjustment among Chinese and European American young adults: Testing a mediation model. The Journal of genetic psychology, 171, 330-362.
Lieber, E., Fung, H., Leung, W. L. P., & Leung, K. W. (2006). Chinese child-rearing beliefs: Key concepts and culture sensitive approaches to scale development. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 140-147.
Lim, S. & Smith, J., (2008). The structural relationships of parenting style, creative personality, and loneliness. Creativity research journal, 20(4), 412-419. doi: 10.1080/10400410802391868
Lin, W. L., Hsu, K. Y., Chen, H. C., & Wang, J. W. (2012). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: A dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 112.
Lin, C. Y. & Cho, S. (2011). Predicting creative problem- solving in math from a dynamic system model of creative problem solving ability. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 255-261.
Lin, W. L., Hsu, K. Y., Chen, H. C., & Wang, J. W. (2012). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: A dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 112-123.
Lin, W. L. & Lien, Y. W. (2013). The different role of working memory in divergent thinking and creative problem solving: A dual-process theory account. Creative Research Journal, 25, 85-96.
Ma, H. H. (2009). The effect size of variables associated with creativity: A meta-analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 30–42. doi:10.1080/10400410802633400.
Maccoby, E. E. & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the content of the family: Prent-child interaction. In. P.H. Mussen(ed.), Handbook of child psychology,4,39 Psychology(vol4), New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Mehrinejad, S. A., Rajabimoghadam, S., & Tarsafi, M. (2015). Therelationship between parenting style aand creativity and the predicatability of creativity by parenting styles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 205, 56–60.
Merle B., Karnes, A. M., Shwedel, & Steinberg, D. (1984).Styles of parenting among parents of young gifted children. Roeper Review, 6(4), 232-235.
Meyer, J. (2009). Asian American Confucianism and children. In D. Browning and B. Miller-McLemore (Eds.), Children and childhood in American religions (pp. 180-194). Piscataway, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258-1265.
McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. V. & De Lisi, R. (2007). Perceptions of family relations when mothers and fathers are depicted with different parenting styles. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168, 425-442. doi:10.3200/GNTP.168.4.425-442
Miller, A. L., Lambert, A. D., & Neumeister, K. L. S. (2012). Parenting style, perfectionism, and creativity in high-ability and high-achieving young adults. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(4), 344, doi: 10.1177/0162353212459257
Mozafari, S. (2014). Prediction of Creativity and Academic Achievement Based on Child Rearing Styles. International Journal of Psychology and Research, 3(3), 166-176. ISSN: 2322-4402.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574-583. doi: 10.1037/h0040291
Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In M. T. Keane & K. J. Gilhooly (Eds.), Advances in the psychology of thinking. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
Raj, S. P. & Raval, V. (2013). Parenting and Family Socialization with a Cultural context. Socialization: Theories, Processes and Impact. ISBN: 978-1-62081-877-0.
Ramey, G.& Ramey, V. A. (2010). The Rug Rat Race. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring, 129-176.
Rao, N., McHale, J. & Pearson, E. (2003). Links between socialization goals and childrearing practices in Chinese and Indian mothers. Infant and Child Development 12, 475-492.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.
Roberts, B. W. & Mroczek, D. (2008). Personality Trait Change in Adulthood. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008 Feb 1; 17(1):31-35.
Rubin, K. H. & Chung, O. B. (2006). Parenting beliefs, behaviors, and parent-child relations: A cross-cultural perspective. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Rudowicz, E., & Ng, T. S. (2003). On Hg’s Why Asians are less creative than Westerners [Book review]. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 301–302.
Rudy, D., & Grusec, J. E. (2001). Correlates of authoritarian parenting in individualist and collectivist cultures and implications for understanding the transmission of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 202-212.
Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for Creative Potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 317-324.
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development andpractice. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academy Press.
Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 93–96. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.93
Runco, M. A. & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential. Crativity Research Journal, 24(1): 66-75.
Runco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96.
Saeki, N., Fan, X., & Dusen, L. V. (2001). A comparative study of creative thinking of American and Japanese college students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 24–38.
Schooler, J. W., Ohlsson, S., & Brooks, K. (1993). Thoughts beyond words: When Language overhadows insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122, 166-183.
Sen, R. S. & Sharma, N. (2013). The Familial Context of Creativity: Patterns of Nurturance in Families of Creative Children. Psychological Studies, 58, 374-385. doi: 10.1007/s12646-013-0221-y.
Simons, R. L., Wu, C-I, Lin, K-H, Gordon, L., & Conger, R. D. (2000). A cross-cultural examination of the link between corporal punishment and adolescent antisocial behavior. Criminology, 38(1), 47-79.
Simonton, D. K. (1995). Drawing inferences from symphonic programs: Musical attributes versus listener attributions. Music Perception, 12, 307–322.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In R. J. Sternberg,(Ed.), Handbook of creativity, 116-133. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Snowden, P. L. & Christian, L. G. (1999). Parenting the young gifted child: Supportive behaviors. Roeper Review, 21, 215-222. doi:10.1080/02783199909553964
Sroufe, L. A. (1996). Emotional development: The organization of emotional life in the early years. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Tennent, L. & Berthelsen, D. (1997). Creativity: What does it mean in the family context? Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 1, 91-104.
Torrance, E. P. (1969). Prediction of adult creative achievement among high school seniors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 13, 223–229.
Torrance, E. P. (1979). The search of satori & creativity. Buffalo, New York: Creative Education Foundation, Inc.
Torrance, E. P. (1993). Understanding creativity: Where to start? Psychological Inquiry, 4, 232–234.
Torrance, E. P. & Goff, K. (1989). A quiet revolution. Journal of Creative Behavior, 23(2), 136-145.
Triandis, H. T. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–512
Triandis, H. T. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51(4), 407-415.
Triandis, H. T. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907-924.
Wagner, U., Gais, S., Haider, H., Verleger, R., & Born, J. (2004). Sleep inspires insight. Nature, 427(6972), 352-355.
Wakefield, J. F. (1989). Creativity and cognition some implications for arts education. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 51-63.
Wakefield, J. F. (1992). Creative thinking: Problem-solving skills and the art orientation. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.
Weisberg, R. W. (1995). Prolegomena to theoriesof insight in problem solving: Definition of terms and a taxonomy of problems. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 157-196). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Williams, F. E. (1969). Models for encouraging creativity in the classroom by integrating cognitive-affective behaviors. Educational Technology, 9(12), 7-13.
Wright, C. & Wright, S. (1986). A conceptual framework for examining the family’s influence on creativity. Family Perspective, 20(2), 127–136.
Wu, C. & Chao, R. K. (2011). Intergenerational Cultural Dissonance in Parent-Adolescent Relationships among Chinese and European Americans. Developmental Psychology 47: 493-508.