研究生: |
高新畬 Kao, Hsin-YU |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
彈性分組應用於國中家政課之差異化教學研究 An Action Research on Differentiated Instruction with Flexible Grouping in Junior High School Home Economics Classes |
指導教授: |
湯仁燕
Tang, Ren-Yan |
口試委員: |
湯仁燕
Tang, Ren-Yan 張民杰 Chang, Min-Chieh 洪詠善 Hung, Yung-Shan |
口試日期: | 2025/01/12 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
教育學系課程領導與教學實踐碩士在職專班 Department of Education_In-service Teacher Master's Program of Curriculum Leadership and Teaching Practice |
論文出版年: | 2025 |
畢業學年度: | 113 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 139 |
中文關鍵詞: | 彈性分組 、差異化教學 、國中家政課 |
英文關鍵詞: | flexible grouping, differentiated instruction, middle school home economics |
研究方法: | 行動研究法 |
論文種類: | 代替論文:專業實務報告(專業實務類) |
相關次數: | 點閱:8 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究運用行動研究法,探討彈性分組在國中八年級家政課程中的應用歷 程,並分析其對學生學習成效的影響以及教師專業成長的經驗反思。研究對象為 梅花高中八年級導班 26 位學生,課程主題為「食品新世界」,共實施八堂課。
本研究透過彈性分組方式進行家政課的規劃與實施,資料蒐集包含:學習任 務單與小組成果、同儕互評與自我評量、札記心得、課程觀察與錄影、半結構式 訪談、諍友觀察紀錄表、教師省思札記與課堂回饋問卷等多元資料進行研究分析, 獲致以下結論:
壹、 彈性分組以需求導向的差異化教學目標設計為基礎,兼顧學生學習背景 與偏好,結合多元素材,滿足不同學習風格需求,並透過融入多學科與 分層挑戰的謎題設計,促進學生思考與自主學習能力的發展。
貳、 彈性分組策略充分符應學生多元需求與合作精神,並透過即時調整課堂 時間與清晰的指導語,確保活動的有序與高效執行。
參、 課程透過生活化與挑戰性的設計提升學生專注與參與度,結合彈性分組 創造多元合作情境,增強學生的合作技巧與同儕互動,並有效提升對食 品加工與添加物的認知。
肆、 彈性分組透過課前準備與挑戰提升課堂管理效率,動態調節促進靈活教 學,同時精進分工合作與團隊合作的能力,展現教師在教學省思與專業 成長的實踐成果。
本研究根據以上結論,提出相關建議,期望能為國中家政課程的教學策略設計與實務應用提供參考,並促進彈性分組模式的進一步發展與推廣。
This study employed action research to explore the implementation process of flexible grouping in the eighth-grade home economics curriculum and to analyze its impact on student learning outcomes as well as teacher reflection and professional growth. The participants were 26 eighth-grade students from Plum Blossom Middle School. The curriculum theme, "A New World of Food," was carried out over eight lessons.
The study utilized flexible grouping to plan and implement the home economics lessons. Data collection included diverse sources such as learning task sheets and group outputs, peer evaluations and self-assessments, reflective journals, classroom observations and recordings, semi-structured interviews, critical friend observation records, teacher reflection notes, and classroom feedback questionnaires. The analysis of the collected data led to the following conclusions:
I. Flexible grouping, based on a needs-oriented approach to differentiated instructional goals, took into account students' learning backgrounds and preferences. By integrating diverse materials and incorporating interdisciplinary and leveled challenges into puzzle designs, it fulfilled the needs of different learning styles and fostered students' critical thinking and autonomous learning abilities.
II. The flexible grouping strategy effectively addressed the diverse needs of students while promoting collaborative spirit. Clear instructions and real-time adjustments of classroom activities ensured an orderly and efficient execution.
III. The curriculum, through its practical and challenging design, enhanced students' focus and engagement. Flexible grouping created diverse collaborative contexts, strengthened cooperative skills, and improved peer interactions, while effectively enhancing students’ understanding of food processing and additives.
IV. Flexible grouping improved classroom management efficiency through pre-lesson preparation and challenges, facilitated adaptive teaching through dynamic adjustments, and refined division of labor and team collaboration
iii
skills, demonstrating the practical outcomes of teacher reflection and professional growth.Based on the findings, this study offers relevant recommendations as a reference for designing instructional strategies and practical applications in middle school home economics classes, aiming to promote the further development and adoption of the flexible grouping model.
朱庭萱(2016)。國小英語教師實踐差異化教學之個案研究(104NTPT0611014)﹝碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rfd45m
呂翠華 (2011)。彈性分組:從學習障礙學生需求的觀點探討區分性教學在普通班的實施策略。特殊教育季刊,119,7–14。
吳樎椒(2014)。差異化教學在幼兒教育的思與行。課程與教學,17(2),119-140。
林佩璇、李俊湖、詹惠雪(2018)。差異化教學。心理出版社。
林曉音(2014)。國小六年級數學領域運用差異化教學之行動研究(102NHCT5212037)﹝碩士論文,國立新竹教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
徐文琴(2016)。建構差異化國小英語教學之行動研究(104NTPT0611015)〔未出版之碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6tp78h
張錫勳(2016)。差異化教學的桃花源:國中課堂學習共同體的差異化教學設計與實踐。中等教育,67(4),85-111。
Tomlinson, C. A.(2004)能力混合班級的差異化教學〔張碧珠、呂潔樺、賴筱嵐、蔡宛臻、黃晶莉譯,2014〕。五南出版社。(原著出版年:2004)
黃于眞、陳美如(2018)。差異化教學對國中學生數學學習成效影響之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,11(1),91-122。
陳潔亭(2021)。彈性分組應用於國中彈性學習課程之行動研究(109NTNU5576008)〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/szn59r
陳珈誼(2016)。差異化教學與合作學習對國中學生提升英語學習成效之行動研究:以桃園市某國中為例(104NDHU5331018)﹝碩士論文,國立東華大學﹞。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u222ng
Tomlinson, C. A.(2013)差異化班級學生評量〔張碧珠、呂潔樺、賴筱嵐、蔡宛臻、黃晶莉譯,2017〕。五南出版社。(原著出版年:2013)
劉欣華(2018)。探究差異化教學於國小教學之實踐。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(3),116-123。
魏秀妤(2016)。運用差異化教學對提升國小六年級低成就學生英語學習成效之研究(104NTPT0284029)〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺北教育大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dh5337
蔡清田(2020)。教育行動研究新論(1版3刷)。五南圖書出版公司。
蔡怡萱(2018)。高中教師於融合班數學課堂實施差異化教學之行動研究(107NTNU5284011)〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/66ttf8
鄺柔羽(2023)。國小五年級數學課程實施之行動研究--以差異化教學彈性分組為例(111NTNU5576004)〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/68fpy5。
蘇千芷(2023)。運用「工作站學習法」實踐文言文差異化教學之行動研究(111NTNU5576002)〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w9vnq4
Tomlinson, C. A., & Murphy, M. (2015)。領導差異化教學:培育教師,以培育學生 〔侯秋玲譯,2020〕。心理出版社。(原著出版年:2015)
Tomlinson, C. A.(2014)。差異化班級:回應所有學習者的需求 〔張碧珠、呂潔樺、林芯汝、劉慧平、陳雲釵、賴筱嵐、蔡宛臻譯〕。五南出版社。(原著出版年:2014)
Baumgartner, T., Lipowski, M., & Rush, C. (2003). Increasing reading achievement of primary and middle school students through differentiated instruction 〔Unpublished master’s thesis〕.
Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dalhouse, D. (2012). Differentiated instruction: Making informed teacher decisions. The Reading Teacher, 66(4), 303-314.
Gillies, R. M. (2003). The behaviors, interactions, and perceptions of junior high school students during small-group learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 137–147.
Grimes, K. J., & Stevens, D. D. (2009). Glass, bug, mud. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 677-680.
Gregory, G. H., & Chapman, C. (2012). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn't fit all. Corwin Press.
Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners. Free Spirit Publishing.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. J. (1999). Making Cooperative Learning Work. Theory into Practice, 38, 67-73.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.
Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative Learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Kagan Publishing.
Levy, H. M. (2008). Meeting the needs of all students through differentiated。instruction: Helping every child reach and exceed standards. Clearing House, 81(4), 161-164.
Liu, Y. F. (2008). Differentiated Instruction through Flexible Grouping in EFL Classroom. Journal of Taipei Municipal University of Education. Education Series, 39(1), 97-122.
Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 344-360). Routledge.
Strong, R., Perini, M., Silver, H., & Thomas, E. (2004). Creating a differentiated mathematics classroom. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 73-78.
Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (Eds.). (1998). Peer-assisted learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Tieso, C. (2005). The effects of grouping practices and curricular adjustments on achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(1), 60-89.