2016年川普作為全球矚目的黑天鵝，當選了美國總統並積極實施製造業回流美國之政策。另外中國19大後，席捲全球的紅色供應鏈，更是企圖再提升中國製造業的全球地位。然而，對貿易依存度高、倚賴著眾多中小型企業的臺灣，將受到來自於全球供應鏈變動的衝擊。本研究將探討如何在美中臺供應鏈的巨浪下，找出一條臺灣所屬的道路?
首先透過次級資料的彙整，整理出投資帶動貿易效果逐漸式微的研究理論骨幹，並透過美中臺經貿的概況分析。進而探討出美中臺供應鏈的影響性，並說明其意涵。
其二，將研究主軸聚焦於臺美供應鏈，針對臺美各產業經貿、供應鏈現況，描繪出臺美供應鏈圖像、研析歸類出四類型臺資企業以及其面對川普政策可能遭遇的情況分析。並在此圖像與歸類架構下，深入探討臺灣大型企業、中小企業。
其三，委託鄧白氏運用其長年建構之企業資料庫，進行隨機抽樣電話調查，所得到的166家臺資企業及34家在臺美商企業有效問卷，進行樣本結構分析及排序性常態機率模型分析。
其四，綜合本研究調查結果，觀察到臺商赴美投資涵蓋層面可能涵蓋：物聯網、智慧機械（含機器人）、生技醫藥等新興產業。然，自川普上任以來，鴻海、台塑等業者已規劃擴大對美國投資面板、石化等產業，顯示在川普經貿政策與產業供應鏈重組的影響下，臺美雙邊投資標的與貿易型態亦將趨於多元化發展。另，結合臺資企業的迴歸模型分析，發現如果臺資企業屬於金屬機械業、或者有在開發中國家進行海外投資設廠佈局策略；如果臺資企業認為川普政策會帶來經濟刺激、去全球化等效果、基礎建設擴張效果、能源價格降低效果，將會影響其對川普政策的認知程度。
最後，本研究擬出對政府以及企業的前瞻性強化臺美供應鏈策略，如下:
1. 爭取與美方洽簽避免雙重課稅協定
2. 協助廠商於法規面、資訊面、人才面等諮詢需求
3. 鼓勵臺商赴美投資於新興產業領域
4. 鼓勵臺商回臺投資
5. 持續推動法規鬆綁工程，促進臺美產業鏈結與人才流動
6. 避免對單一市場過度依賴及產業過度單一等問題
7. 鼓勵臺灣跨國企業供應鏈整合

In 2016, Trump, as the world's black geese, was selected as the President of the United States. Trump actively implements the policy of returning manufacturing to the United States. In addition, after China's 19th National Congress, the red supply chain sweeping the world is also trying to enhance the global status of China's manufacturing industry. However, Taiwan, which is highly dependent on trade and relies on many small and medium-sized enterprises, will be affected by changes in global supply chains. This study will explore how to find a road to Taiwan under the huge waves of the US-China-Taiwan supply chain.
First of all, through the consolidation of secondary data, we sorted out the theoretical concept of investment-driven trade effects. Analyze the situation through the US-China-Taiwan trade. Then we will discuss the imagery of the US-China-Taiwan supply chain for Taiwanese companies and explain its implications.
Second, focus the research spindle on the US-Taiwan supply chain. In view of the current economic and trade and supply chain status of various industries in Taiwan and the United States, we have mapped out the supply chain images of Taiwan and the United States, and analyzed the four types of Taiwan-funded enterprises and their analysis of the situation that may be encountered in the face of Trump policies. Under this image and classification structure, we will explore in depth Taiwan's large enterprises and medium enterprises..
Third, entrust Dun & Bradstreet to conduct a random sample telephone survey using it’s long-established enterprise database. The 166 Taiwan-funded enterprises and 34 valid questionnaires in Taiwanese companies were selected for sample structure analysis and sorting normal probability model analysis.
Fourth, based on the results of this research, it is observed that the coverage of Taiwanese investment in the United States may cover emerging industries such as the Internet of Things, smart machinery (including robots), and biotechnology and medicine. However, since Trump took office, Foxconn company, Formosa Plastics company and other companies have planned to expand their investment in the US, such as panel and petrochemical industries. In addition, combined with the regression model analysis of Taiwan-funded enterprises, it is found that if Taiwan-funded enterprises belong to the metal machinery industry, or if they have developed overseas investment in setting up factories, if Taiwan-funded enterprises think that Trump policies will bring economic stimulus, Counteracting the effects of globalization, infrastructure expansion, and energy price reduction will affect its awareness of Trump policies.
Finally, this study proposes a forward-looking strengthening of the US and US supply chain strategy for the government and enterprises, as follows:
1. Try to negotiate with the United States to avoid double taxation agreement
2. Assist manufacturers in consulting requirements such as regulations, information, and talents
3. Encouraging Taiwanese businessmen to invest in the United States in emerging industries
4. Encouraging Taiwanese businessmen to return to Taiwan
5. Continuing to promote the loosening of laws and regulations to promote the industrial chain and talent flow in Taiwan and the United States
6. Avoid excessive reliance on the single market and excessive single industry issues
7. Encourage the Integration of Supply Chain in Multinational Enterprises in Taiwan

（一）中文部分
1. 顧瑩華等（2014）。經濟部國際貿易局專案計畫成果報告書〈投資與我國貿易關聯研析〉，103年「國際經貿趨勢預測與政策研究計畫」。委託單位：經濟部國際貿易局；受託單位：財團法人臺灣經濟研究院；執行單位：財團法人中華經濟研究院。
2. 張超群（2016）。〈國際投資環境改變下對臺商全球投資布局影響分析〉，發表於「經濟部產業發展諮詢委員會綜合審議會」。2016.10.27。
3. 王健全、顧瑩華（2015）。《臺灣產業全球布局對策研究》。臺北：行政院經濟建設委員會。
4. 謝寬裕（1999）。臺灣產業外移與產業空洞化之檢驗。臺灣經濟金融月刊35(8)，46-65。
5. 經貿透視雙周刊，〈川普新時代啟航新貿易〉。2016.11.23。
6. 鄭秀玲（2017）〈第十三屆經融與經濟政策研討會〉2017.06.10。
7. 勤業眾信聯合會計事務所舉行「川普新政與2017年臺灣資本市場趨勢展望」觀點分析記者會。
8. 商業周刊（2017）。〈增800倍，超越英特爾〉。封面故事摘要。2017.10.08。
9. 商科技新報（2017）。〈川普「美國製造」效應？ 張忠謀：臺積電現階段沒有赴美設廠生產壓力〉。2017.01.13。
10. 商業周刊，〈臺積電〉。封面故事摘要。2017.10.08。。
11. 科技橘報（2016）。（【鴻海霸業史】創建人類史上第一百萬工業王國，細數鴻海每個重要轉型歷程）。2016.12.15。
12. 劉光瑩（2017）。〈史上最大訪美團，誰會選擇投資美國？〉，天下雜誌。2017-06-16。http://www.cw.com.tw/article/articleLogin.action?id=5083164
13. 丹尼．羅德里克（Dani Rodrik）著；陳信宏譯（2016）。《全球化矛盾：民主與世界經濟的未來》。2016.02.03。
14. 中時電子報 (2017)。「美若課45%關稅…高盛：陸經濟成長掉3個百分點」。2017.01.26。http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20170126000077-260202。
15. 聯合新聞網 (2017)。「沒完沒了！川普稱大陸是史上最大工作偷竊犯」。2017.12.08。https://udn.com/news/story/5/2157759。
16. 每日頭條（2017）。「十年間「爆炸性上漲」 中國製造業平均工資超過拉美」。2017.02.27。https://kknews.cc/zh-mo/finance/5m3q866.html。
17. 商業週刊（2017）。〈郭臺銘領軍　臺商美國大拓荒〉，封面摘要。2017.07.12。http://magazine.businessweekly.com.tw/Article_pa.aspx?id=32616。
18. 工商時報，〈鴻海美國飛鷹計畫，郭董：最快最快7月底定調〉。2017.06.22。https://ctee.com.tw/News/ViewCateNews.aspx?newsid=153186&cateid=kjmd。
19. TVBS（2017）。「飛鷹計畫」起飛！　郭董赴美投資3千億。2017.07.27。https://news.tvbs.com.tw/politics/750681。
20. 經濟日報（2017）。〈臺塑美國百億美元投資 啟動〉。2017.10.24。https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/2774462。
21. 經濟日報（2017）。《全球新變局　經濟新路徑》，頁144-147。新北市：經濟日報，2017年4月初版。
22. 財訊趨勢特刊（2017）。〈川普真的讓美國製造業復甦了嗎？〉。2017.10.16。http://www.wealth.com.tw/article_in.aspx?nid=12729&pg=1。
23. 蘇暐勝、柯昀伶(2016)。〈台灣在研發創新能量上的跨國比較-以 OECD 資料為例〉。2016.12。
（二）外文部分
1. Lipsey, R. E., Ramstetter, E., & Blomström, M. (2000). Outward FDI and parent exports and employment: Japan, the United States, and Sweden. Global Economy Quarterly, 1(4), 285-302.
2. Branstetter, L. (2006). Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan's FDI in the United States. Journal of International economics, 68(2), 325-344.
3. Feldstein, M. (1995). The effect of marginal tax rates on taxable income: a panel study of the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Journal of Political Economy, 103(3), 551-572.
4. Head, K., & Ries, J. (2001). Increasing returns versus national product differentiation as an explanation for the pattern of US-Canada trade. American Economic Review, 858-876.
5. Stevens, G. V., & Lipsey, R. E. (1992). Interactions between domestic and foreign investment. Journal of international money and Finance, 11(1), 40-62.
6. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system: Concepts for comparative analysis. Comparative studies in society and history, 16(4), 387-415.
7. Barros, C. P., Damásio, B., & Faria, J. R. (2014). Reverse FDI in Europe: An Analysis of Angola's FDI in Portugal. African Development Review, 26(1), 160-171.
8. Craig A. Gif, Michelle Drew Rodriguez, Bharath, Gangula, Ph.D., Aleda V. Roth, Ph.D., Tim Hanley(2016). "2016 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index", Deloitte.
9. Nicola Smith (2017). ” Taiwan Is Suffering From a Massive Brain Drain and the Main Beneficiary is China”, TIME, 2017.08.21.
10. USTR (2017), “Summary of Objectives for the NAFTA Renegotiation”. Office of The United States Trade Representative, Executive Office of the President. 2017.07.17.https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/NAFTAObjectives.pdf.
11. “Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter”.https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102316-Contractv02.pdf.
12. The White House (2017), 2017 Tax Reform for Economic Growth and American Jobs.http://taxprof.typepad.com/files/trump-tax-plan.pdf.
13. Goldman Sachs, (2017). ’’MADE IN THE USA ...OR CHINA?-25 Years of Supply Chain Investment at a Crossroads’’, EQUITY RESEARCH, March 26.