本研究旨在發展「未來想像傾向量表」。經由文獻分析，研究者擬訂未來想像傾向量表預試題目，先以臺北市358名高中學生為預試樣本，並透過項目分析及探索性因素進行刪題，萃取出量表因素為「超越現實」、「鑒往知來」、「情感價值」、「情節建構」，並確認正式量表題目。接著以臺灣北中南東四區共1338名高中職學生為正式樣本進行施測，以驗證性因素分析進行構念效度的驗證，並分別與威廉斯創造性傾向量表、想像力特質問卷、華─葛氏批判性思考量表精簡版WGCTA中文版求取其相關，和估算高職學生未來想像傾向得分的差異，來做為效標關聯效度之證據。研究結果如下：
一、研究者針對「未來想像傾向」構念編製量表，包含「超越現實」、「鑒往知來」、「情感價值」、「情節建構」四個測量面向。
二、「未來想像傾向量表」在信度方面，其內部一致性Cronbach's α全量表為 .92，各分量表為 .83~ .86；在建構效度方面，其基本適配度、整體模式適配度和內在結構模式適配度，四個因素累積解釋變異量達57.20%；與想像特質、創造性傾向均有中度以上相關，與批判思考有低度相關；此外，本量表以高職設計類科學生為效標組，與其它類科學生比較起來，確實有較高得分。
最終，研究者依據研究結果提出建議，供後續研究及實務工作之參考。

The main purpose of this study was to develop The Scale of Future Imagination Disposition. According to the analyses of previous researches, the researcher devised the pretest of The Scale of Future Imagination Disposition. First, the researcher recruited 358 senior high school students living in Taipei City as pretest-sample students. Through the methods of item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, future imagination disposition was extracted into 4 factors: (1)beyond reality (2)past review and future prediction (3)emotion and value (4)plot construction. Then, the given questions of the scale could be formally confirmed. Furthermore, the researcher recruited another 1338 senior high and vocational high school students from northern, central, southern, and eastern Taiwan as formal sample students. In light of the confirmatory factor analysis, the researcher could testify the construct validity. Meanwhile, they took the test of Test of Divergent Feeling, Imagination Disposition Test, and Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal to get the separate correlations as the evidence of criterion-related validity. Also, compute the difference of the scores which design department students got higher scores than other department students as the evidence of criterion-related validity.The results are as followed:
1. The researcher develops The Scale of Future Imagination Disposition which includes our measuring factors-"beyond reality", "past review and future prediction", "emotion and value" and "plot construction".
2. In the reliability of The Scale of Future Imagination Disposition respect, the Cronbach's internal reliability of consistency α equals to .92, with 4 subscales' α ranging from .83 to .86. In the construct validity of The Scale of Future Imagination Disposition respect, its preliminary fit criteria, overall model fit and fit of internal structure model can explain approximately a total variance of 57.20%. There is medium positive correlation between the score of future imagination disposition and that of imaginative traits and creative disposition. There is low positive correlation between the score of future imagination disposition and that of critical thinking. Furthermore, design subject of vocational students are defined as a criterion group. Compared with other subject of vocational students, design subject of vocational students get higher grades.
At last, the researcher provided some suggestions according to the outcome for future studies and practical work.

申繼亮、王鑫、師保國（2005）。青少年創造性傾向的結構與發展特徵研究。心理發展與教育，21，28-33。
朱智賢（1989）。心理學大辭典。北京：北京師範大學。
行政院（2009）。第八次全國科學技術會議總結報告。取自http://www.nsc.gov.tw/
pla/tc/8th/formal.asp.〔Executive Yuan (2009). Final Report of the Eighth National Science and Technology Conference. Retrieved from http://www.nsc.
gov.tw/pla/tc/8th/formal.asp
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺（1998）。新編創造思考測驗研究第二年期末報告。臺北市：教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告。
巫博瀚（2005）。自我調整學習—概念分析與理論應用。學習、教學與評量國際研討會。
巫博瀚、王淑玲（2004）。自我調整學習的理論與實踐。中等教育，55，94-109。
李宜庭（2011）。大學設計系教師評量偏好影響學生想像發展之研究。國立高雄第一科技大學工業設計系碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
李璞珉（1996）。心理學與藝術。北京：首都師範大學。
林幸台、王木榮（1987）。威廉斯創造力測驗指導手冊。臺北市：心理。
林幸台、王木榮（1994）。威廉斯創造力測驗。臺北市：心理。
林幸台、王木榮（1994）。威廉斯創造力測驗指導手冊。臺北市：心理。
林偉文（2011）。未來想像與創造力的培育。國民教育，51，62-72。
林偉文、朱采翎、王毓苓、朱嘉琪、劉家瑜（2011）。科學教育、科技與設計之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 98-2511-S-152
-020 -MY2），未出版。
林榮泰（2005）。文化創意，設計加值。藝術欣賞，1，26-32。
邱英豪（2007）。國中學生未來時間觀照之研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
邱發忠、林耀南、陳學志（2009）。創造想像力機制暨課程設計及效果評估研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 98-2511-S-606 -001 -MY2），未出版。
邱發忠、陳學志、林耀南（2011）。以生產探索模式為基礎之跨領域創造想像實作研究─創造想像力機制暨課程設計及效果評估研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 98-2511-S-606 -001 -MY2），未出版。
邱發忠、陳學志、林耀南、涂莉苹（付印中）。想像力構念之初探。教育心理學報。
邱皓政（2006）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市：五南。
邱皓政（2012）。量化研究法：測驗原理與量表發展技術。臺北市：雙葉。
洪瑞雲（1982）。羅賽浦創造力測驗的並行效度研究。管理科學論文集，81-90。
張旭中、邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君（2011）。調整焦點動機、成功預期對創造力與 批判性思考的影響。教育心理學報，43(2)，499-520。
張春興（1989）。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市：東華。
教育部（2009）。職業學校群科課程綱要宣導手冊。臺北市：教育部。
教育部國語辭典（2000）。教育部國語辭典簡編本網路版。2011年10月1日引用自http://dict.concised.moe.edu.tw/main/cover/main.htm
教育部職業學校群科課程推動工作圈（2010）。職業學校群科歸屬表。依99年7月9日台技（一）字第0990106610號函修正。
許育齡、梁朝雲（2011）。影響設計領域學習者想像之學習心理因素探析。臺中教育大學學報：人文藝術類，25(1)，1-19。

陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵（2003）。多變量分析方法：統計軟體應用。臺北市：五南。
陳學志、陳彰儀、陳美芳、陳心怡、陳榮華（2011）。華－葛氏批判思考量表精簡版中文版。臺北市：中國行為科學社。
黃尹（2011）。未來想像教學方案發展之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
黃芳銘（2007）。結構方程模式理論與應用第五版。臺北市：五南。
黃素菲（2001）。人生目標在諮商中改變歷程之個案詮釋研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理輔導系博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
董奇（1995）。兒童創造力發展心理。臺北市：五南。
詹志禹、林顯達、陳嘉成（2010）。未來想像與創意人才培育中程個案計畫。教育部顧問室，未出版，臺北市。
詹志禹、陳玉樺（2011）。發揮想像力共創台灣未來─教育系統能扮演的角色。教育資料與研究雙月刊，100，23-52。
滕守堯（1998）。審美心理描述。成都：人民。
賴永茂（2010）。領導者人格特質、團隊學習與團隊表現之關聯性研究─以跨領域設計課程為例。國立台灣科技大學設計系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
賴美辰（2011）。「與2030年的我對話」未來想像教學方案發展之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
Amabile, T. M. (1996). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
Angelo, T. A. (1995). Classroom assessment for critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology,22(1), 6-7.
Bagozzi, R. P., &Yi, Y. (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of Academy of Marketing Sceience, 16(1), 74-94.
Bandura, A.(1982). Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
Bandura, A.(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York : W. H. Freeman.
Bjerstedt, A. (1982). Future Consciousness and the School. Malmo, School of Education, University of Lund, Sweden.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models, 136-162.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197-253.
Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted: developing the potential of children at home and at school (4th ed.). NY: Macmillion
Costa, A. L. (1991). The school as a home for the mind. In A. L. Costa,Developing minds: A resource for teaching thinking, revised edition, (1), Alexandria: ASCD
 
Cropley, A. J. (1999). Creativity and cognition: producing effective novelty. Roeper Review, 21, 253-260.
Daltrey, M. H., & Langer, P.(1984). Development and evaluation of a measure of future time perspective. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 719-725.
Damon, W. (2005). Personality Test: The dispositional dispute in teacher preparation today, and what to do about it. Journal of Teacher Education -Issues on Dispositions, 2, 1-6.
D'Argembeau, A., Ortoleva, C., Jumentier, S., & Van der Linden, M. (2010). Component processes underlying future thinking. Memory & Cognition, 38, 809-819.
De Volder, M., & Lens, W. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 566-571.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath.
Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct. New York: Holt
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Balch & Company.
Egan, A., (2008). Imagination, Delusion, and Self-Deception. Delusion and Self-Deception: Affective Influences on Belief-formation. Bayne and Fernandez (eds.), Psychology Press.
Egan, K. (1992). Imagination in teaching and learning: ages 8-15. London: Psychology Press.Ennis, R. H.
Eisner T. (1965). Defensive spray of a phasmid insect. Science, 148, 966-968
Ennis, R. H.(1985).Critical thinking and the curriculum. National Forum: hi-Kappa-Phi-Journal,65（1）,28-31.
Facione, P. A., Sanchez, C. A., Facione, N. C., & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. The Journal of General Education, 44(1), 1-25.
Facione, P.A., Sanchez, C.A., & Facione, N.C., (1994). Are college students disposed to think? ERIC Doc. No.: ED 368-311
Finke, R. A. (1995). Creative insight and preinventive forms. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 255–280). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T.B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Förster, J., Friedman, R., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177-189.
Fortunato, VJ & Furey, JT (2009). The Theory of MindTime and the relationships between thinking perspective and the Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(4), 241-246
Galtung, J.（1982）Sport as Carrier of Deep Culture and Structure, Current Research on Peace and Violence, 5, 133-143
Garcia, T., McCann, E. J., Turner, J.E., & Roska, L. (1998). Modeling the mediating role of volition in the learning process. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 392-418
Gay, L. R., (1992). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application. New York: Macmillan.
Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J. & Kokinov, B. N. (Eds.) (2001). The analogical mind: Perspectives form cognitive science. US: The MIT Press.
Getz, I., & Lubart, T. (2000). An emotional-experiential perspective on creative symbolic-metaphorical processes. Consciousness & emotion, 1, 283-312.
 
Gharabaghi, K. (2008). Contemplations about the imagination and complacency in child and youth care practice. Relational Child & Youth Care Practice, 21, 30-41.
Guildford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). UK: Prentice Hall International.
Hicks, D. (2002). Lessons for the future. London: Routledge.
Hirt, E. R., Melton, R. J., McDonald, H. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Processing goals, task interest, and the mood-performance relationship: a mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 245-261.
Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The Analysis of Covariance Structures: Goodness-of-fit Indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 325-344
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Gutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6 ,1-55.
Jones, J. C. (1992). Design methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Jorerskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8: New statistical features. IL: SSI.
Kastenbaum, R. J. (1961). The dimensions of future time perspective, an experimental analysis. Journal of General Psychology, 65, 203-218.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NY: Guilfords Press.
Kuhn, T. (1991). The essential tension: tradition and innovation in scientific research. In Boyd, R., Gasper, P. & Trout, J. D. (Eds.), The Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lewin, K.（1951）. Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harpe
 
Lin, C. M. (1999). The effects of self-efficacy and task value on students’ commitment and achievement in web-based instruction for Taiwan higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Lindqvist, G. (2003). Vygotsky’s theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 245–251.
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. A., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803-855.
Mckellar, P. (1957). Imagination and thinking. New York: Basic Books.
McPeck, J. E. (1990). Teaching critical thinking：Dialogue and dialectic. New York and London: Routledge.
Mellou, E. (1995). Review of the relationship between dramatic play and creativity in young children. Early Child Development and Care, 112, 85-107.
Moran, S. & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the Making: Vygotsky’s Contemporary Contribution to the Dialectic of Creativity & Development. In . R. K. Sawyer (ed.). Creativity and Development. Oxford University Press. 61–90.
Munn, N. L., Fernald, D. L., & Fernald, P. S. (1969). Introduction to psychology. Boston: Hougmton Miffin Co.
Murray, E. L. (1986). Imaginative thinking and human experience. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, Virginia: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Norris, S. P. (1995). The meaning of critical thinking test performance: The effects of abilities and dispositions on scores. In D. F. Jr. (Ed.), Critical thinking: Current research, theory, and practice. Dordect, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Nuttin, J., & Lens, W. (1985). Future time perspective and motivation: Theory and research method. NJ: Leuven University Press , Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development（OECD）,（2007）. Schooling for Tomorrow - The Starterpack: Futures Thinking in Action. Abstract Retrieved from http: //www.oecd.org/document/33/0,3343,en_2649_34521_3898 1601_1_1_1_1,00.html
Parker, J. P. (1989). Instruction strategies for teaching and gifted. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Passmore(1985). Recent philosophers: A supplement to A hundred years of philosophy. London: Duckworth.
Paul, R.W. (1993). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. USA: Jane Willsen and A. J. A. Binker Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Peetsma, T.T.D.(2000). Future time perspective as a predictor of school investment. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research, 44, 177-192
Perkins, D. & Tishman, S. (1998). Dispositional Aspects of Intelligence. Retrieved on February 5, 2009 from http://learnweb.harvard.edu/alps/thinking/docs/Plymouth.pdf
Perkins, D. N. (1987). Creative thinking. To appear in dimensions of thinking. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Parker Quarterly, 39(1), 1-21
Perkins, D.N., & Ritchhart, R. (2004). When is good thinking? In D.Y. Dai & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perkins, D.N., Tishman, S., Ritchhart, R., Donis, K., & Andrade, A. (2000). Intelligence in the wild: A dispositional view of intellectual traits. Educational Psychology Review, 12 (3), 269-293.
Perkins. D. N., & Tishman, S. (2001). Dispositional aspects of intelligence. In S. Messick & J. M. Collis (Eds.), Intelligence and personality: Bridging the gap in theory and measurement (pp. 233-257). Maweh, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Pezzulo, G., & Castelfranchi, C. (2009). Thinking as the control of imagination: A conceptual framework for goal-directed systems. Psychological Research, 73, 559-577.
Pintrich, P. R. (1989).The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames, & M. Maher (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments (vol.6, pp.117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Motivation and classroom learning. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (Vol. 7, pp.103-122). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Plucker, J. A. & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp.35-61). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Raines-Eudy, R. (2000). Using structural equation modeling to test for differential reliability and validity: An empirical demonstration. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(1), 124-141.
Raudsepp, E. (1981). How Creative Are You? New York: Academic Press.
Reichling, M. J. (1990). Images of imagination. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 282-293.
 
Ritchhart, R. (2002). Intellectual character: What it is, why it matters, and how to get it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive skill learning. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education, 3, 13-44. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Seibt, B. & Förster, J. (2004). Stereotype threat and performance: how self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 38-56
Shell, D. F. (1985). Achievement motivation: Interactive effects of locus of control, expectancy attribution, self-efficacy, goal-setting, and future time perspective on academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 91-100.
Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2001). The multivariate dimensionally of personal control and future time perspective beliefs in achievement and self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 481-506.
Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason：Rationality, critical thinking and education. New York and London: Routledge.
Singer, J. L. (1999). Imagination. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Creativity. San Diego: Academic Press.
Snyder, C. R., Lehman, K. A., Kluck, B., & Monsson, Y. (2006). Hope for rehabilitation and vice versa. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51, 89-112
Snyder, C. R., Lopez, S. J., Shorey, H. S., Rand, K. K., & Feldman, D. B. (2003). Hope theory, measurements, and applications to school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 122-139.
Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon, D. R. (2002). Hope theory: A member of the positive psychology family. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 257-276). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity. New York Press.
Stevens, W. (1951). The necessary angel. New York: Vintage Books.Teachers' College Press.
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D., & Edwards, C. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742-752.
Tishman, S., & Perkins, D. N. (1997). The language of thinking. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(5), 368-374.
Tishman, S., Jay, E., & Perkins, D. N. (1993). Thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 147-153
Tishman, S., Perkins, D. N., & Jay, E. (1995). The thinking classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal Construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.
UNESCO.(2009). Review of Contexts and Structures for Education for Sustainable Development. Abstract retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001849/184944e.pdf.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7-97.
Wallace, M. (1956). Future time perspective in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 240-245.
 
Ward, T. B. (1994), Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1-40
Ward, T. B. (1995). What’s old about new ideas? In S. M. Smith, T.B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognitive approach (pp. 157-178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ward, T. B., & Wickes, K. N. S. (2009). Stable and dynamic properties of category structure guide imaginative thought. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 15-23.
White, A. (1990). The language of imagination. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
Williams, F. E. (1980). Creativity assessment packet. Buffalo, NY: DOK
Zeisel, J. ( 1991). Inquiry by design: Tools for environment-behaviour research (2nd edition).Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.