簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳錦珊
Chen Chin-Shan
論文名稱: 拜倫《唐璜》中的女英雄角色
The Heroines in Byron's Don Juan
指導教授: 周昭明
Chou, Chao-Ming
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 1999
畢業學年度: 87
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 120 pages
中文關鍵詞: 具備男子氣概的女英雄憎惡女性重德行
英文關鍵詞: heroine, anti-feminist, moralistic
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:206下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 我們清楚可見,拜倫嘲諷了十九世紀初對於史詩般英雄主義的頌揚。《唐璜》一開始就揭露在其所處年代是不可能找到實至名歸的英雄。相反地,在這詩作中他特別描寫數位具備男子氣概的女英雄,其類型包括嚴苛的女才子、積極主動的多情女子、以及耽於肉慾的悍婦。由於拜倫在這詩作中呈現的諷刺口吻,許多評論家誤認其立場是憎惡女性的,尤其是針對行為逾越的女人。事實上,拜倫主要嘲諷的不是女性本質而是針對攝政時期女性作家小說中過度擴充的女英雄主義,以及男性化女權者。簡言之,拜倫檢視其當代女性典型的主要目的是為了找到適合當時社會的女英雄。第一章重點在澄清拜倫於《唐璜》中以女性角色為焦點的用意。第二章討論拜倫針對博學且重德行的母親角色所展現的反女性主義立場。第三章探討追求性愛的女主角在實際生活中遭遇的阻撓和兩難。第四章分析及質疑女性主義所讚賞的性別扮裝。第五章則以拜倫所創適合其當代背景的女英雄特色總結。

    It is clear that Byron has deflated the glorification of epic heroism and revealed from the start of Don Juan the impossibility of finding a real hero worthy of the name in his age. Rather, in the poem he takes great care to represent a number of masculinized heroines, ranging from the austere bluestocking to the active romantic lady of sentiment and the sexually voracious virago. Judging from his satirical discourse, some critics regard Byron as an absolute misogynist, proclaiming his abhorrence of the transgressive women. In fact, Byron exercises a comic war not against female nature but against the excessively expanded heroinism in the feminocentric Regency female-authored novels and the mannish feminists in the society. In a word, Byron attempts to censor the available women stereotypes of his age in order to find a suitable heroine for his own society. In Chapter I, I try to clarify Byron's project by focusing on women characters in his Don Juan. In Chapter II, my concern is to illustrate Byron’s anti-feminist stance on the learned and prudishly moralistic mother figures. In Chapter III, I intend to examine the dilemma and obstacles the erotic heroines confront in their love stories. In Chapter IV, the crossdressing strategy which feminists rely on to make a subversive masculinized heroine possible is questioned. In Chapter V, my conclusion, I suggest the sort of ideal heroine Byron has created for his contemporary society.

    Abstract ...................................................i Acknowledgements .........................................iii Chapter I. Introduction ..................................1 Chapter II. The Moralistic and Learned Mother Figures .....9 Chapter III. Women in Amour ...............................37 Chapter IV. The Female Aggressors in Masculine Apparel ...70 Chapter V. Conclusion ..................................105 Works Cited ..............................................112

    Ackroyd, Peter. Dressing Up: Transvestism and Drag, the History of an Obsession. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979.
    Alloula, Malek. The Colonial Harem. Trans. Myrna Godzich and Wlad Godzich. Minneapolis: Minnesota UP, 1986.
    Austen, Jane. Sense and Sensibility. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 1984.
    Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Helene Iswolsky. Massachusetts: The M.I.T. Press, 1968.
    ---. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Trans. & Ed. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: Minnesota UP, 1984.
    Barton, Anne. Byron: Don Juan. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992.
    Belsey, Catherine. The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama. London: Methuen, 1985.
    Betty, Bernard. Byron’s Don Juan. London & Sydney: Croom Helm Ltd, 1985.
    Bhabha, Homi. The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge, 1994.
    Bloom, Harold. Introduction. George Gordon, Lord Byron. By
    Bloom. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1986. 1-38.
    Boccaccio, Giovanni. The Decameron. Trans. Frances Winwar. New York: Random House, 1995.
    Bono, Barbara J. “Mixed Gender, Mixed Genre in As You Like It.” Rosalind. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 1992. 151-66.
    Botting, Fred. Gothic. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.
    Bullough, Vern L. and Bullough, Bonnie. Crossdressing Sex and Gender. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania UP, 1993.
    Byron, George Gordon. Don Juan. London: Penguin Books, 1973.
    Castle, Terry. “Eros and Liberty at the English Masquerade, 1710-90.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 17(1982): 156-76.
    ---. Masquerade and Civilization: The Carnivalesque in Eighteenth- Century English Culture and Fiction. Standford: Standford UP, 1986.
    ---. “The Culture of Travesty: Sexuality and Masquerade in Eighteeenth Century England.” Sexual Under Worlds. Eds. Rousseau and Peter. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1987. 156-180.
    Christensen, Jerome. Lord Byron’s Strength. Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1993.
    Cott, Nancy F. “Passionlessness: An Introduction of Victorian Sexual Ideology 1790-1850.” Sign 2(1978): 219-36.
    Davis, Natalie Zemon. “Women on Top: Symbolic Sexual Inversion and Political Disorder in Early Modern Europe.” The Reversible World: Symbolic Inversion and Art and Society. Ed. Barbara A. Babcock. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 147-90.
    Eliot, T. S. “Byron.” English Romantic Poets. Ed. M. H. Abram. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1960.
    Franklin, Caroline. “Juan’s Sea Changes: Class, Race and Gender in Byron’s Don Juan.” Don Juan. Ed. Nigel Wood. Bucking: Open UP, 1993. 56-89.
    ---. Byron’s Heroines. New York: Oxford UP, 1992.
    Freud, Sigmund. Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis. Trans. & ed. James Strachey. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1965.
    ---. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Ed. James Strachey. London: The Hogarth Press, 1953.
    Gardiner, Michael. The Dialogics of Critique: M.M. Bakhtin & The Theory of Ideology. New York: Routledge, 1992.
    Greenblatt, Stephen. “Fiction and Friction.” Shakespearean Negotiations: the Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley: California UP, 1988. 66-93.
    Hamilton, Edith. Mythology. New York: Little, Brown & Company, 1969.
    Hopper, Wilfred. “The Tudor Sumptuary Laws.” English Historical Review 30 (1915): 433-49.
    Horn, Andras. Byron’s Don Juan and the Eighteenth Century Novel. New York: Winterthur, 1962.
    Howard, Jean E. “Crossing, the Theatre, and Gender Struggle in Early Modern England.” Shakespeare Quarterly 39: 4 (1988), 418-440.
    Kahn, Madeleine. Narrative Transvestism: Rhetoric and Gender in the Eighteenth-Century English Novel. Ithaca and London: Cornell UP, 1991.
    Kaplan, Cora. Sea Change: Essays on Culture and Feminism. New York: Open UP, 1990.
    Kauffman, Linda S. Discourse of Desire: Gender, Genre, and Epistolary Fictions. Ithaca & London: Cornell UP, 1986.
    Kelsall, Malclom. “The Slave-Woman in the Harem.” Studies in Romanticism 31 (1992): 315-31.
    Lauber, John. “Don Juan as Anti-Epic.” Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 8 (1968): 607-19.
    Lawson, Annette. Adultery: An Analysis of Love and Betrayal. New York: Basic Book, 1988.
    Manning, Peter J. “The Byronic Hero as Little Boy.” Lord Byron’s Don Juan. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987. 43-66.
    Marchand, Leslie A. Byron’s Poetry. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 1965.
    ---. Byron: A Biography. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1975.
    ---. Byron’s Letters and Journals. 12vols. New York: Alfred A. Knopf,1982.
    ---. “Byronic Attitude.” Reading Byron. Ed. Alice Levine & Robert N. Keane. London: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1993.
    Mills, Jane, ed. Erotic Literature. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc., 1993.
    Moers, Ellen. Literary Women: The Great Writers. New York: Cambridge UP, 1977.
    Moi, Toril. Sexual/ Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. London and New York: Methuen, 1985.
    Mordell, Albert. The Erotic Motive in Literature. New York: Collier Books, 1962.
    Morson, Cary Savl. “Who Speaks for Bakhtin?: A Dialogic Introduction.” Critical Inquiry 10 (December 1983): 225-243.
    Noble, Andrew. “Byron: Radical, Scotish Aristocrat.” Byron and Scotland. Ed. Angus Calder. New Jersey: Barnes & Nobel Books, 1989. 23-50.
    Paglia, Camile. Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson. New York: Random, 1991.
    Plato. Symposium. Trans. Robin Waterfield. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1994.
    Pyre, J. F. A. “Byron in our Day.” The Atlantic Monthly XCIX (April 1907): 542-52.
    Rackin, Phyllis. “Androgyny, Mimesis and the Marriage of the Boy Heroine on the English Renaissance Stage.” PMLA 102 (1987), 1: 29-41.
    Rutherford, Andrew. Lord Byron. London and New York: Routledge, 1995.
    Santas, Gerasimos. Plato & Freud: Two Theories of Love. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988.
    Shilstone, Frederick W. Approaches to Teaching Byron’s Poetry. New York: MLAA, 1991.
    Stern, J. P. Don Juan. New York: Cambridge UP, 1992.
    Stoller, Robert J. Sex and Gender: the Development of Masculinity and Feminity. New York: Jason Aronson, 1974.
    ---. Observing the Erotic Imagination. New Haven: Yale UP, 1985.
    Stubbes, Phillip. The Anatomie of Abuses. London: Oxford UP, 1583.
    Tate, Candace. “Byron’s Don Juan: Myth as Psychodrama.” Lord Byron’s Don Juan. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987. 87-106.
    Trueblood, Paul Graham. Studies in Byron’s Don Juan. New York: Russel, 1962.
    Turner, Victor M. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine, 1969.
    Wilson, Carol Shiner. “Stuffing the Verdant Goose: Culinary Esthetics in Don Juan.” Mosaic 24/ 3-4: 33-51.
    Wolfson, Susan J. “ ‘Their She Condition’: Cross-Dressing and the Politics of Gender in Don Juan.” ELH 54 (1987): 142-7.
    Wollstonecraft, Mary. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Ed. Carol H. Poston. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1975.

    無法下載圖示
    QR CODE