本研究旨在探討臺灣地區大專體育教師之身體政治型態。研究之目的為暸解台灣地區大專體育教師，在國家體育政策、個人抉擇、外顯表現三個層面上的身體政治型態。研究方法為問卷調查法與訪談法，採立意取樣，對國內120位大專體育教師進行問卷調查，回收有效問卷93份，有效問卷回收率77.5％，Coefficient Alpha＝.91，於問卷統計完成後，對國內4名體育專家學者進行訪談，並與問卷結果深入比對。獲致研究結果為：1.在國家體育政策層面上的身體政治型態為：（1）參與規劃、權力分層與任務執行導向；（2）作為科層體制的控制工具，以評鑑、檢核政策的執行成效；（3）以權力運作的方式調整國家體育政策，並與政界互動，發揮影響力。2.在個人抉擇層面上的身體政治型態為：（1）注重溝通協調、善用利益交換的手腕與優先性抉擇；（2）效益主義導向，注重結果論；（3）理性優先，並有著內心外界妥協上的矛盾。3.在外顯表現層面上的身體政治型態為：（1）策略聯盟、競爭中帶有合作與服從規訓；（2）高度社會化，理性壓制感性；（3）採取妥協，爭取認同，尋求互利共生，並臨機應變。

The purpose of this research is to conduct study on the form of bodily political
of physical education teachers in Taiwan. In addition, the objective of this research is
to understand the form of bodily political of physical education teachers in Taiwan in
three levels including national physical education policy, individual choice and
outer-appearance etc. Research methods included questionnaire research and
interview and purposive sampling was adopted. Questionnaire research was
conducted on 120 college physical education teachers in the country. Number of
effective questionnaire recovered was 93 and the recovery rate of effective
questionnaire was 77.5% and Coefficient Alpha=.91. Upon completion of statistics on
the questionnaires, interview was conducted with four domestic physical education
experts and scholars so as to obtain in-depth understanding. The results of this
research are: 1. The form of bodily political in the level of national physical
education policy is: (1) planning participation, divisional level of authority and
mission execution direction; (2) to serve as the control tool of the section level system based on assessment to review the execution result of policy; (3) adjust the national physical education policy in the form of authority operation and interact with the political arena so as to bring the power of influence into full play. 2. The form of bodily political in individual choice is: (1) emphasize on communication and coordination and proper use of the skill of interest exchange and choice of priority; (2) benefit principle direction and emphasis on the outcome; (3) priority in rationality and there is contradiction of compromise in the mind and with outside. 3. The form of bodily political in the outer-appearance level includes: (1) strategic alliance and within competition there is rule of cooperation and obedience; (2) highly socialized and the rationality will suppress the sensibility; (3)adopts compromise, strive for recognition and seek for mutual benefit and mutual survival and will respond as the occasion requires.

ㄧ、中文部份：
石元康（1992）。當代政治思潮（131-176頁）。臺北：民主基金會。
邱振訓（2004）。論容忍德性－斯賓諾莎政治哲學之考察。未出版碩士論文。國立臺灣大學哲學研究所，臺北市。
吳澤玫（2004）。論羅爾斯「對」的優先性。未出版碩士論文。國立臺灣大學哲學研究所，臺北市。
姚人多（2000）。論傅柯的＜主體與權力＞：一個批判性的導讀。當代，150，130。臺北：合志文化。
陳金盈、徐耀輝(譯)（2003）。運動政治學：運動、政策與政治（1-24頁）。臺北：風雲論壇。(Barrie Houlihan)
高湘澤、高全余(譯)（1994）。權力，它的形式、基礎和作用。臺北：桂冠。（Dennis H. Wrong）
高毅(譯)（1995）。傅柯的生死愛欲（563-605頁）。臺北：時報文化。
（Miller, James）
鄒健愉（2003）。論馬庫色的技術哲學。未出版碩士論文。私立東海大學哲學研究所，臺中市。
程瑞福（2002）。國民中學體育教師評鑑指標之建構。未出版博士論文。國立臺灣師範大學體育學系，臺北市。
董茂永(譯)（2000）。技術哲學。北京：商務。(Jean-Yves Goffi)
馮炳昆(譯)（1999）。政治論。北京：商務。(Spinoza, Benedictus de)
楊凱麟(譯)（2000）。德勒茲論傅柯。臺北：麥田。(Gilles Deleuze)
溫錫增(譯)（1963）。神學政治論。北京：商務。(Spinoza, Benedictus de,1963)
賀麟(譯)（1983）。倫理學。北京：商務。(Spinoza, Benedictus de)
蔡宜珍（2004）。論休姆的德行與原則。未出版碩士論文。國立臺灣大學哲學研究所，臺北市。
錢俊(譯)（1995）傅柯－超越結構主義與詮釋學（187-289頁）。臺北：桂冠。（Hubert L. DreyfusPaul ＆ Rabinow）
謝石(譯)（1990）。性史。臺北：結構群。（Michel Focault）
謝宗宜（2002）。傅柯論自我的技術。未出版碩士論文。國立政治大學哲學研究所，臺北市。
羅麗英(譯)。（1988）。愛欲與文明。臺北：南方。（Herbert Marcuse）
關文運(譯)（1990）。人性論。北京：商務。（Hume, David）

二、外文部份：
Alejandro, Roberto.（1993）.Rawls’s Communitarianism. Canadian
Journal of Philosophy, 23（1）, 75-99.
A.S.L.Farquharson and R.B.Rutherford.（1989）.Aurelius Marcus, The
Meditation of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus and a Selection from the
Letters of Marcus and Fronto. New York：Oxford University
Press, 4（3）, 23.
Benson J.K.（1982）.Networks and policy sectors：a framework for extending intergovernmental analysis, in Roger, D. and Whitten, D. (eds). Inter Organisational co-ordination. Iowa State University.
Williams, Bernard.（1981）.Moral Luck. Cambeidge：Cambeidge
University Press.
Caney, Simon.（1992）.Liberalism and Communitarianism：A
Misconceived Debate. Political Studies, 40, 273-289.
Cox, R. H.（1992）.After corporatism：a comparison of the role of medical
professionals and social workers in the Dutch welfare state.
Comparative Political Studies, 24（4）, 532-551.
Dowing, K.（1994）.Policy networks：don’t stretch a good idea too far, in
Dunleavy, P.J. and Stanyer, J. （eds）. Belfast：The Political
Studies Association of the UK. Contemporary Political Studies
1994, l（1）.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul.（1983）.Michel Foucault：Beyond
Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago：The University of
Chicago Press.
Foucault, Michel.（1977）.Discipline and Punish：the Birth of Prison, trans. by Alan Sheridan. Newyork：Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel.（1979）.Discipline and punish: The Birth of Prison,
trans. by Alan Sheridan. New York：Vintage / Random House.
Foucault, Michel.（1980）.Power / Knowledge：Selected Interviews and
Other Writings 1972-1977, ed. by Colin Gordon. Brighton：The
Harvester Press.
Foucault, Michel.（1988）.The History of Sexuality, Volume 3：The Care
of the Self, trans. by Robert Hurley. Newyork：Vintage Books
Edition.
Foucault, Michel.（1990）.The History of Sexuality, Volume 1：An
Introduction, trans. by Robert Hurley. Newyork：Vintage Books
Edition.
Foucault, Michel.（1990）.The History of Sexuality, Volume 2：The Use of
Pleasure, trans. by Robert Hurley. Newyork：Vintage Books
Edition.
Frankena, William K.（1973）.Ethic. 2nd ed. Edited by Englewood Cliffs
（pp.15-172）. New Jersey：Prentice-Hall.
Frederick Ferre.（1995）.Philosophy of Technology. Athnes, Georgia：The
University of Georgia Press.
Haas, P.（1992）.Introduction：Epistemic Communities and International
PolicyCo-ordination. International Organization, 46（1）, 1-35.
Hart, H. L. A.（1961）.The Concept of Law. Oxford：The Clarendon Press.
Hart, H. L. A.（1979）.Between Utility and Right. The Idea of Freedom：
Essays in Honor of Isaiah Berlin（pp.77-98）. Oxford：Oxford
University Press.
Hampshire, Stuart.（1993）.Liberalism：The New Twist. The New York Review of Books, 40（14）, 43-47.
Heclo, H.（1972）.Review article：policy analysis. British Journal of
Political Science, 2, 83-108.
Heclo, H.（1978）.Issue networks and the executive establishment, in King, A.（ed.）. The New American Political System. Washington DC：American Enterprice Institude.
Herbert Marcuse.（1991）.One Dimensional Man. London：Routledge.
Herzog, Don.（1989）.Happy Slaves：A Critique of Consent Theory.
Chicago（pp.151-152）. London：The University of Chicago Press.
Hill, M. and Bramley, G.（1986）.Analysing Social Policy. Oxford：
Blackwell.
Hofferbrt, R. I.（1974）.The Study of Public Policy. Indianapolis：Bobbs
-Merrill.
Hogwood, B. （1987）.From Crisis to Complacency, Oxford：Oxford University Press.
Houlihan, B.（1991）The Government and Politics of Sport.London：
Routledge.
Hume, David.（1975）.Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and
Concercing the of Morals. P. H. Nidditch. 3rd ed. Oxford：
Clarendon Press.
Hume, David.（1990）. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by L.A.
Selby-Bigge, text revised and notes by P. H. Nidditch. 2nd ed.
Oxford：Oxford University Press.
Isaiah Berlin.（1991）.The Pursuit of the Ideal, in Henry Hardy, ed. The
Crooked Timber of Humanity：Chapters in the History of Ideals.
New York：Knopf.
Jenkins, W. I.（1978）.Policy Analysis：Political and Organisational
Perspectives. London：Martin Robertson.
Juergen Habermas.（1995）.Reconciliation Throuth the Public Use of
Reason：Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Lieberalism. The
Journal of Philosophy. 92（3）, 109-131.
Kant, Immanuel.（1970）.Kant’s Political Writings. Edited by Hans Reiss. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press.
Kagan, Shell.（1998）.Normative Ethics（pp.30-61）. Boulder, Coloradio：
Westview Press.
Kymlicka, Will.（1988）.Liberalism and Communitarianism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 18, 181-203.
Kymlicka, Will.（1989）.Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford：
Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, Will.（1989）.Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality.
Ethics. 99（4）, 883-905.
Laffin, M.（1986）.Professional communities and policy communities in
central-local government relations, in Goldsmith, M. （ed.）. New
Research in Central-Local Government. Aldershot：Gower.
Maclntyre, Alsdair.（1981）.After Virtue（pp.204-205）. Notre Dame,
Indiana：University of Notre Dame Press.
Mill, John Stuart.（1998）.Utilitarianism. Edited by Roger Crisp
（pp.57-105）. Oxford. Newyork：Oxford University Press.
Olson, M.（1971）.The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge. Mass：
Harvard University Press.
Paul Rabinow.（1997）.The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954-
1984, volume I, Ethics：Subjectivity and Truth, ed（pp.223-251）.
New York：The New Press.
Petracca, M. P.（1992）.The Politics of Interests. Boulder, Col.：Westview
Press.
Plato（1964）. Alcibiades I, in The Dialogues of Plato（666）, trans. by Jowett B.London：Oxford University Press.
Rawls, John.（1971）.A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts：
Haevard University Press.
Rawls, John.（1987）.The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7, 1-25.
Rawls, John（1995）.Replay to Habermas. The Journal of Philosophy, 92
（3）, 132-180
Rawls , John.（1997）.The Idea of Public Reason Revisited, In John
Rawls, The Law of Peoples. The University of Chicago Law
Review, 64.
Rawls, John.（1999）.”The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”. The Law of
Peoples（pp.129-180）. Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard
University Press.
Rhodes, R.A.W.（1985）. Power dependence, policy communities and intergovernmental networks. Public Administration Bulletin, 49.
Rhodes, R. A. W.（1986）.The National World of Local Government.
London：Allen and Unwin.
Rhodes, R. A. W. and Wistow, G.（1988）.The Core Executive and Policy
Networks：Caring for Mentally Handicapped People. Essex
Papers in Policy and Government, 49. Colchester：University of
Essex.
Rhodes, R. A. W. and Wistow, G.（1990）.Policy networks：a British
perspective. Journal ot Theoretical Politics, 2, 293-317.
Richardson, J. J. and Jordan, A. G.（1979）.Governing Under Pressure.
Oxford：Martin Robertson.
Ripley, R. B. and Franklin, G. A.（1976）.Congress, the Bureaucracy, and
Public Policy. Homewood, 3.：The Dorsey Press.
Rose, R.（1988）.Comparative policy analysis：the program approach, in
Dogan, M. （ed.）, Comparing Pluralist Democracies：Strains on
Legitimacy, Boulder, Col（pp.217-241）.：Westview Press.
Rosenthal, Michael A.（2001）.Tolerance as a Virtue in Spinoza’s Ethics.
Journal of the History of Philosophy, 39, 554.
Sandel, Michael J.（1982）.Liberalism and the Limits of Justice.
Cambridge University Press.
Sharp, J.（1985）.Central co ordination and the policy network. Political
Studies, 33（3）, 361-381.
Sidgwick, Henry.（1996）.The Methods of Ethics（pp.85-86）. Bristol,
UK：Thoemmes Press.
Smith, Norman Kemp.（1941）.The Philosophy of David Hume（pp. 174-175）. London：MacMillan.
Smith, Steven B.（1997）.Spinoza, Liberalism, and the Question of Jewish
Identity（pp.88-133）. New Haven：Yale University Press.
Smith, T. A.（1975）.The Comparative Policy Process. Santa Barbara：
Clio Press.
Steven Barbone.（1999）.Power in the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus
（pp.94）Piety, Peace and the Freedom to Philosophize. Ed, trans.
by Paul J. Dordrecht：Kluer Academic Publishers.
Taylor, Charles.（1985）.Philosophical and the Human Sciences.
Philosophical Papers, 2. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press.
Thurber, J.（1991）.Divided Democracy：Cooperation and Conflict
Between President and Congress. Washington：CQ Press.
Truman, D.（1951）.The Governmental Process. New York：A. E. Knopf.
Wilks, S. and Wright, M.（eds）.（1987）.Comparative Government
-Industry Relations. Oxford：Clarendon Press.
Wilson, J. Q.（1973）.Political Qrganizations. Beverly Hills：Sage.
Wright, M.（1988）.Policy communities, policy networks and comparative
industrial policies. Policy Studies, 36（4）.