苗栗縣苑裡鎮的蕉埔社區，座落於火炎山自然保留區山腳下，擁有豐富的自然生態與傳統客家人文資源，建造埤塘與擷取地下伏流水的「塭窟」，以及農田田埂和住家建築基腳使用疊石保護，形成特殊的文化景觀，是與大自然共生的聚落單元。然而隨著時代演變、經濟與產業的發展，以及人口老化、土地休耕、產業活化、傳統智慧凋零、農業水利遺址破壞等問題，社區的傳統文化逐漸流失。本研究目的為了解蕉埔社區農村聚落生態及文化景觀資源空間分布關係，以及居民社經背景對里山倡議精神認同、生態系統服務之內涵重視程度之差異，並藉由居民對生態系統服務重視集群探討與里山精神之關係。本研究首先透過文獻回顧了解里山倡議精神以及生態系統服務，同時進行環境資源調查，將社區之歷史文化景觀及特殊的水利系統設施整理及分析，並透過在地居民以及相關人士的訪談，了解社區土地對於人的回憶與意義、信仰、活動與期望，以及對於地方之生態環境及歷史文化景觀之保存態度，再以問卷調查分析蕉埔社區居民對里山精神的認同與生態系統服務內涵之重視程度。
研究結果顯示，(1)居民對於傳統文化逐漸消失感到無力，年輕一代為了生活離開農村社區到城市打拼，而蕉埔社區的水池、魚池、卵石田埂不僅是重要的水利及農作生產設施，更是珍貴的文化景觀資源及田間動植物的農村生態棲地；而居民對里山精神認同以及生態系統服務的重視程度有顯著差異，(2)越年輕與教育程度越高之社區居民，較認同透過永續管理和使用生物資源，從而適當的維護生物多樣性之里山倡議理念，(3)並且較重視蕉埔社區生態系統服務的生物多樣性、優質的生態環境以及供給服務，其中蕉埔國小藝術發展課程強化了生態系統之美學服務功能，(4)研究發現里山精神與生態系統服務有顯著的相關性；(5)生態系統服務重視集群之社經背景不同對里山精神認同程度也有所差異，生態系統服務高重視群與環境供給重視群主要也以年輕居民組成，由此可知社區中青壯年的居民，已成為發展台灣里山社區之重要關鍵。研究建議能以生態旅遊、儀式、環境教育、技藝傳承等活動提升居民對農村生態保育與傳統文化景觀保存的認同感及認知，並且藉由里山倡議之願景提出蕉埔社區規劃與保存策略，如推廣生態友善農業、與相關機構協同經營…等，落實農村生態環境、生產、生活文化三者之間的平衡，實踐以自然資源永續利用與傳統文化資源維持人與自然和諧共處的里山願景。

Jiau-Pu community in Yuanli Township, Miaoli County County, is near the Huoyanshan Nature Reserve, and is rich in natural ecology and traditional Hakka cultural. With the ponds, the "caves" which store the groundwater, the stone-stacked farmland ridges and bases of the building, a special cultural landscape has been formed, it’s a settlement unit which is symbiotic with nature. However, as time goes by and with the development of economy and industry, the ageing population, the fallow, the industrial activation, the disappearance of traditional knowledge, the destruction of agricultural water conservancy facilities sites, etc., the traditional culture of the community is gradually lost. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to understand the spatial distribution of ecological and cultural landscape resources of rural community in the Jiau-Pu community, the difference between residents’ socioeconomic status, recognition of the spirit of Satoyama Initiative and important of ecosystem services to explore the relationship between the clusters of ecosystem services and the spirit of Satoyama. Through the residents important of ecosystem services to discuess the relationship between the clusters of ecosystem services and the spirit of the Satoyama. First, understand the spirit of the Satoyama Initiative and ecosystem services by literature review, and investigate the environmental resources, organizes and analyzes the historical and cultural landscapes of the community and the special water conservancy facility system. And interview the local residents and relevant people to understand the memories, meanings, beliefs, activities and the expectations of the community for residents, as well as the attitudes of the preservation of local ecological environment, historical and cultural landscapes, and then, analyze the residents’ recognition of the spirit of Satoyama Initiative and degree of important of ecosystem service in the Jiau-Pu community by questionnaires.
The results are: (1) residents feel helpless about the gradual disappearance of traditional culture. The young people left to work in cities. The pools, the fish ponds and the stone-stacked farmland ridges in Jiau-Pu community are not only important water and farming production facilities, but also precious cultural landscape resources and rural ecological habitats of animals and plants. There is significant difference between the recognition of Satoyama spirit and the important of ecosystem services for the residents. (2) The younger and higher-educated residents are more likely to agree with the concept of maintaining the biodiversity of Satoyama Initiative by the
sustainable management and the use of biological resources. (3) And they consider the biodiversity, high-quality ecological environment and supply services of the ecosystem services in Jiau-Pu community. Among that, the art development program of Jiau-Pu Elementary School strengthened the aesthetic service function of the ecosystem. (4) It was found that there was a significant correlation between Satoyama spirit and ecosystem services. (5) The clusters with different socioeconomic status, their recognition of the Satoyama spirit is also different. The clusters of high-level consideration of ecosystem services and environmental supply are mainly consisted of young residents in the community, and they are the important key of developing Satoyama community in Taiwan.
The suggestion is to enhance residents' recognition and awareness of rural ecological conservation and preservation of traditional cultural landscapes by ecotourism, rituals, environmental education, and passing down art heritages. Propose the planning and conservation strategies of the Jiao-Pu community with the vision of the Satoyama Initiative, such as environment-friendly agriculture and operation with relevant institutions, etc. To balance the ecological environment, the production and the life culture, and practice the vision of Satoyama which maintain s the harmony between human and nature by the sustainable use of natural resources and traditional cultural resources.

中文文獻
中國科學院可持續發展戰略研究組 (2003)。中國可持續發展戰略報告(編號：7-03-011085-4)。科學出版社。
卞有生、冬霞．金、邵迎暉 (2000)。國內外生態農業對比：理論與實踐。中國環境科學出版社，2000。
王小璘、葉禮維 (2008)。台灣地區水圳研究議題與發展趨勢分析，台灣環境資源永續發展研討會，2008年10月23日。
王志弘、徐苔玲譯 (2006)。地方：記憶、想像與認同。台北：群學出版社，Tim Cresswell著。
王萬邦 (2003)。台灣的古圳道。出版：遠足文化事業股份有限公司。
朱柔若譯 (2000)。社會研究方法-質化與量化取向。台北：揚智文化，W.Lawrence Neuman著。
江進富 (2014)。里山─生物多樣性的環境管理智慧。台灣濕地雜誌，91，16-21。
行政院文化部 (2005)。文化資產保存法。
行政院文化部 (2017)。文化資產保存法施行細則。
余清祥 (2015)。統計分析。政治大學教學簡報。取自：http://csyue.nccu.edu.tw/ch/EMBA1040(Q_Analysis)20150719.pdf
吳芝儀、李奉儒譯(2008)。質性研究與評鑑(上)、(下)。濤石文化事業有限公司，Michael Quinn Patton著。
宋流芳、林宗慶、莫耀忠、吳庭煦、鄒瑩瑩、簡郁倩、周靖璞、陳思安、黃薰葳、顧文治、許振庭、董志勇 (2017)。我們在這里-里山倡議，為永續找希望的亮點系列。正聲廣播公司。
李光中 (2009)。文化地景與社區發展。科學發展，439，38-45。
李光中 (2011)。鄉村地景保育的新思維-里山倡議。台灣林業，3，59-64。
李光中 (2014)。農業濕地保育與里山倡議，科學發展，497，28-35。
李光中 (2016)。地景尺度著眼的里山倡議與生態農業。地景保育通訊。42，12-18。
李承嘉、洪鴻智、詹士樑 (2010)。水梯田濕地生態保存及復育補貼政策之研究（編號：99 林發 -08.2- 保 -5）。行政院農業委員會林務局補助研究計畫。
李素馨 (2007)。法國文化景觀的典範：法國花園盧瓦河流域Loire Valley。法國文化遺產之登錄．保存與經營：文化資產詮釋第三階段人才培育計畫論文集，文化建設委員會。
李素馨、林敬妤、吳治達、莊永忠 (2014)。運用生境價值評估工具建構永續農村地景空間配置。都市與計劃，1，67-97。
李素馨、黃仕憲 (2002)。居民對水圳環境價值認知與構築形式偏好之研究。中國園藝，2，183-198。
李琢 (2015)。人口高齡化，社會福利大挑戰，外交部NGO國際事務會。取自：https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=24475167。
周鶴樹 (2010)。台灣農村地區的永續發展前景與評估。環境與藝術學刊，8，11-32。
林育諄 (2011)。鄉村性、多功能性與台灣鄉村文化地景規劃與重塑。2011年南台灣社會發展學術研討會論文集，屏東：國立屏東教育大學。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花 (2005)。質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究季刊，2，122-136。
林雨莊、焦自美 (2009)。景觀視覺衝擊的評估調查方法。
林俊全 (2006)。從地景保育談澎湖的地質公園。地質專題，46-48。
侯錦雄、陳宏宇、林文毅 (2005)。農村水環境的景觀復育與生態設計。中華水土保持學報，36(4)，401-412。
苑裡鎮志編纂委員會 (2002)。苑裡鎮志。苗栗：苑裡鎮公所
苗栗縣苑裡鎮公所 (2011)。認識苑裡，地理環境，地形。苑裡鎮公所。取自：https://www.yuanli.gov.tw/informationshow.aspx?mid=292&pid=64。
夏榮生、黃群策、許曉華、張弘毅、李光中 (2015)。推動台灣里山倡議的策略架構芻議。台灣林業期刊，41(1)，38-46。
財團法人台灣生態工法發展基金會 (2009)。八煙聚落砌石水梯田生態復舊與產業復甦研究計畫成果報告書。行政院農業委員會林務局。
張玉鈞、北尾邦伸 (2001)。日本里山及其管理與保護。北京林業大學學報，1，90-92。
張建邦 (1997)。多變量分析(初版)，台北市：三民書局。
張碩軒 (2016)。五溝水濕地志工隊：重建水圳生態，溫柔手作比怪手有用。濕地故事．濕地面面觀深度專欄。台灣濕地網。取自：http://wetland.e-info.org.tw/story/aspects/2547.html。
曹勝雄、孫君儀 (2009)。建構地方依附因果關係模式。地理學報，55，43-63。
莊維吉 (2011)。景觀指數應用於台灣具里山地景地區之探討-以北海岸為例(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學生物資源暨農學院生物環境系統工程學研究所。
陳玠廷 (2007)。台灣有機農業之鄉村性論述-以富里鄉羅山村為例 (碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學農業推廣學研究所。
陳彥樺 (2013)。農村再生，生什麼？-談生態友善農業。台灣環境資訊協會環境資訊中心。取自：http://e-info.org.tw/node/85872。
陳美惠、林穎楨 (2017)。整合協同經營與里山倡議的森林治理-以阿禮與大武部落生態旅遊及資源保育為例。台灣林業科學，32(4)，299-316。
陳義彥 (2002)。民意調查。國立政治大學選舉研究中心主編，台北：五南。
陳榮俊、黃振原、翁志成 (2004)。農村景觀及生態建設的新作法。農政與農情，144，行政院農業委員會。
陳麒升 (2004)。生態工法水理研究(碩士論文)。中原大學土木工程系研究所。
曾旭正 (2008) 從社造觀點看「農村再生條例」。小地方新聞網。取自： http://www.dfun.tw/?p=9640。
曾慈慧、沈進成 (2010)。遊客的休閒涉入、地方感與環境復癒知覺關係之研究：以美國德州大彎國家公園為例。新竹教育大學人文社會學報，3(2)，119-145。
裴家騏、陳美汀 (2011)。台灣淺山地區哺乳動物保育的迫切議題。國道永續經營環境復育研討會，119-133。
趙敏 (2017)。臺灣里山倡議下一步 林務局從點至面串聯國土綠網。豐年雜誌，11，76-80。
趙榮台 (2011)。全國生物多樣性教育培訓班。「里山倡議」講義。行政院農業委員會林務局。
劉子綺、李素馨、侯錦雄 (2011)。式微文化地景的再活化泰安村舊鐵道的空間意涵。地理學報，61，147-166。
劉逸姿 (2015)。里山倡議的生態家園實踐：2014年美濃黃蝶祭策展計畫(碩士論文)。高雄師範大學跨領域藝術研究所。
歐皖蘭 (2010)。文化景觀保存與鄉村社區發展之研究-以台南縣後壁鄉菁寮聚落為例(碩士論文)。國立台南大學生態旅遊研究所。
蔡承勳 (2015)。水梯田聚落環境變遷回復力之研究：社會-生態理論之應用(碩士論文)。國立台北大學都市計畫研究所。
蔡淑美 (2009)。台灣鄉村景觀類型與意象之研究(博士論文)。國立中興大學園藝學研究所。
蔡衛忠 (2004)。以生態工法來探討農田水利之永續經營－雲林水利會崁頭厝圳再生為例(碩士論文)。淡江大學建築系。
鄭伊娟 (2016)。原鄉實踐里山倡議精神之初探。農政與農情，290。行政院農業委員會。
樹教育基金會-裡山塾。取自：http://www.kskk.org.tw/satoyama/。
蕭崑杉 (2006)。後鄉村休閒產業論述。持續與變遷：跨學科的農村社會研究研討會。新竹：清華大學人類學研究所。
戴介三、陳玠廷、劉興榮、范美玲、孫正華、王義善、葉人瑋 (2016)。從里山精神看富麗有機樂活聚落之發展與挑戰。農業推廣文彙，61，221-234。
謝宏昌 (2003)。全球化涵構中的鄉村性。全球衝擊與鄉村調適研討會。台北：台灣鄉村社會學會，15~34。
謝孟哲、賴興俊 (2016)。苗栗硬要開發道路 恐切斷石虎棲息地。三立新聞網。取自： http://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=194399。
謝孟哲、賴興俊(2016)。全台只剩5百隻…苗栗縣府硬要開發 恐切斷石虎生路。三立新聞網。取自：https://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=194399。
謝宗恆 (2003)。文化遊憩涉入與場所依戀關係之研究-以北埔地區遊客為例(碩士論文)。私立東海大學景觀學系。
鍾孟瑾 (2014)。里山倡議之逐夢踏實-花蓮富興生態農場創設歷程與經營議題之研究(碩士論文)。國立東華大學自然資源與環境學系。
英文文獻
Agnoletti, M. (2014) Rural landscape, nature conservation and culture: Some notes on research trends and management approaches from a (southern) European perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning.126, (2014) 66–73.
Arriaza, M., & Cañas-Ortega, J. F., & Cañas-Madueño, J. A., & Ruiz-Aviles, P. (2004) Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes, Landscape and Urban Planning .69 (2004) 115–125.
Bradley, S. J., & Richard, C. S. (2001) Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners’ attitudes toward their properties，Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21：p.233-248.
Bricker, K. S., & Kerstetter, D. L. (2000). Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure Sciences, 22(4): 233-257.
Bruce, L. B. (1998) Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (3rd edition). Boston, Allyn & Bacon. 290 pages.
Cloke, P. J. (1977) An index of rurality for England and Wales. Regional Studies 11, pp. 31-46.
Costanza, R., d' Arge, R., Groot, R. d., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., …Belt, M. v.d. (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253-260
Cross, J. E., & Keske, C. M., & Lacy, M. G., & Hoag, D. L. K., & Bastian, C. T. (2011) Adoption of conservation easements among agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming: The role of economic dependence and sense of place，Landscape and Urban Planning, 101(1), p.75-83.
Čustović, H., & Kovačević, Z., & Tvica, M. (2013) Rural Ecology. University of Sarajevo.
Daily, G. C (1997) Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Introduction：What Are Ecosystem Services. Publisher: Island Press, 1718 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 300, Washington, DC 20009.
de Val, G.F., & Atauri, J. A., & de Lucio, J. V. (2006) Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: A test study in Mediterranean-climate landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 77 (2006) 393–407.
Devine-W, P., & Howes, Y. (2010) Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: a wind energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), p.271-280.
European Commission (2017) Agriculture and the environment：Introduction. Agriculture and landscape, Agriculture and rural development. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/envir_en
Forman, R. T. T., & Godron, M. (1986) Landscape ecology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hair, J. F., & Tatham, R. L., & Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (1998) Multivariate data analysis (5th edition.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Harvey, D. (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. New Jersey, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ingerson, A. E. (2000) Changing approaches to landscape. Institute for Cultural Landscape Studies Harvard University.
Lapka, M., & Cudlinová, E. (2003) Changing Landscapes, Changing Landscape's Story. Landscape Research, 28(3), p.323-328.
Lin Chih-Hung (2017) Workshop for Cultural Landscape and Sustaining its Significance–Bhutan 2017. World Heritage Centre (UNESCO), Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/en/events/1324/
Lindzey, G., & Maccoby, E., & Maccoby, N. (1954) Handbook of Social Psychology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1954.
Lokocz, E., & Ryan, R. L., & Sadler, A. J. (2011) Motivations for land protection and stewardship：Exploring place attachment and rural landscape character in Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99(2), p.65-76.
Maes, J., Liquete, C., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Paracchini, M. L., Barredo, J. I., Grizzetti, B., …Lavalle, C. (2016) An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020，Ecosystem Services Volume 17, February 2016, Pages 14-23.
Minichiello, V., & Aroni, R., & Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995) In-depth Interviewing, Second Edition. South Melbourne：Longman.
Mononena, L., Auvinen, A.-P., Ahokumpu, A.-L., Rönkä, M., Aarras, N., Tolvanen, H., Kamppinen, M., Viirret, E., …Vihervaara, P. (2016) National ecosystem service indicators: Measures of social–ecological sustainability, Ecological Indicators 61 (2016) 27–37.
Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994) Attachments to recreation settings: the case of rail-trail users, Leisure Sciences, 16(1): 17-31.
Morimoto, Y. (2011) What is Satoyama? Points for discussion on its future direction.
Natori, Y. (2017) Landscape changes in rural Japan since 1940s and their ecological and visual implications，《國際水田地景多樣性經營工作坊》，行政院農業委員會花蓮區農業改良場專刊153號，民106年10月
Reid, W. V., Mooney, H. A., Cropper, A., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S. R., Chopra, K., Dasgupta, P., Dietz, T., …Zurek, M. B. (2005) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
Sauer C. (1925) The Morphology of Landscape. University of California Berkeley, Calif: University of California publications in geography, 2(2).University of California publications in geography. University of California Press.
Shannon, G., & Edward, J. R. (1995) The effect of goal orientation and place dependence on select goal interferences among winter backcountry users. Leisure Science, 17, p.171-183.
Takeuchi, K., & Ichikawa, K., & Elmqvist, T. (2015) Satoyama landscape as social–ecological system: historical changes and future perspective, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability Volume 19, April 2016, Pages 30-39.
The International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative (IPSI) Formation and Development (2010) The 10th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP10).
Turner, K. G., & Odgaard, M. V., & Bøcher, P. K., & Dalgaard, T., & Svenning, J.-C. (2014) Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning. 125, (2014)，89–104.
UNU-IAS (2010a) Satoyama-Satoumi Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Socio-ecological Production Landscapes of Japan – Summary for Decision Makers.
UNU-IAS (2010b) Advancing socio-ecological production landscapes for the benefit of biodiversity and human well-being.
UNU-IAS (2017) The International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative (IPSI) Information Booklet and 2016 Annual Report.
Wagner, P. L., & Mikesell, M. W. (1962) Readings in Cultural Geography. (1st edition) University of Chicago Press.
William, D. R., & Patterson M. E., & Roggenbuck J. H., & Watson, A. E. (1992) Beyond the Commodity Metaphor: Examining Emotional and Symbolic Attachment to Place. Leisure Sciences, 14, p.29-49.
World Heritage Centre (2008) Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, United nations educational, scientific and cultural organization. Intergovernmental committee for the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage.