「反向合意模式」是當代幽默理論中，對幽默故事的理解歷程描述最為具體的理論，然而該理論當時僅使用讀者閱讀完整則笑話之主觀評定結果作為理論驗證的依據，卻少有其他的實徵研究檢驗該理論所提出之階段歷程模式。因此，本研究主要目的為探討影響幽默故事理解的認知歷程，分別檢驗「基模優勢性」與「逆溯推論步驟」對幽默理解在眼動軌跡上的差異。實驗一，操弄營造敘述衍生不同強度的基模優勢性（高優勢基模組和低優勢基模組）。結果發現高優勢基模的關鍵語句在平均瞳孔大小顯著大於低優勢基模關鍵語句，表示閱讀高優勢基模的幽默故事所引起的生理激發較大。實驗二，將關鍵語句操弄為「提供逆溯推論」、「簡單逆溯推論」和「複雜逆溯推論」三種狀況。結果發現，複雜逆溯推論笑話比提供逆溯推論笑話有較多的回視次數與總凝視時間，支持逆溯推論歷程具有心理實質性。本研究結果大致支持反向合意模式，區分「基模優勢性」與「逆溯推論步驟」對幽默理解與好笑的影響。

The present study aimed to test whether the schema dominance and inference difficulty influence the comprehension of humor story in Contrast-Coherence Theory or not. There were two reading experiments and desktop eye tracker was used to recorded participants’ eye movements when they were reading. In Experiment 1, 30 participants read two versions of set-up lines (high and low dominant schema), and the results showed a larger pupil size in high dominant schema than low dominant schema. As for experiment 2, 36 participants read different punch line versions (provided, simple and complex). Through analyzing the data from experiment 2, it was observed that participants were more likely to make regressive (leftward) eye movements after reading the punch-line of a humor story, and total viewing duration was longer for the complex backward inference than provided backward inference. The results of experiment 2 are taken to support the psychological reality of the process of frame-shifting, suggesting readers literally revisit aspects of the prior context while apprehending humor stories. In conclusion, this study supports the idea that the schema dominance and inference difficulty are influential factors in humor comprehension.

邱發忠、陳學志、卓淑玲（2003）。幽默創造訓練之課程設計暨實徵效果評估。教育心理學報，34（2），179-198。
許峻豪、鄭谷苑（2005）。圖像幽默理解歷程與雙路徑幽默理解模式。應用心理研究，26，117-142。
陳學志（1991）。幽默理解的認知歷程。國立台灣大學心理學研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳學志、賴惠德、邱發忠（2010）。眼球追蹤技術在學習與教育上的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55（4），39-68。
陳學志、鄭昭明、卓淑玲（2001）。笑話中幽默因子的訊息整合歷程研究。中華心理學刊，43（2），137-153。
陳學志、詹雨臻、Ruch, W.、Proyer, R.（2011）。被笑恐懼相關特質的測量與信度及效度之評估。測驗學刊，58（1），119-145。
Altmann, G. T. M., van Nice, K. Y., Garnham, A., & Henstra, J. A. (1998). Late closure in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 459-484.
Apter, M. J. (1982). The experience of motivation: The theory of psychological reversals: Academic Press.
Bartolo, A., Benuzzi, F., Nocetti, L., Baraldi, P, & Nichelli, P. (2006). Humor comprehension and appreciation: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(11), 1789-1798.
Berlyne, D. E. (1972). Humor and its kin. In J. H. Goldstein, & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The Psychology of humor. New York and London: Academic Press.
Calvo, M. G. (2001). Working memory and inferences: Evidence from eye fixations during reading. Memory, 9(4-6), 365-381.
Coulson, S., & Kutas, M. (2001). Getting it: human event-related brain response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders. Neuroscience Letters, 316(2), 71-74.
Coulson, S., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2006). Looking back: Joke comprehension and the space structuring model. Humor, 19(3), 229-250.
Coulson, S., & Wu, Y. C. (2005). Right hemisphere aActivation of joke-related information: An event-related brain potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(3), 494-506.
Crawford, M. (2003). Gender and humor in social context. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1413–1430.
Goodman, J. (1983). How to get more smile age out of your life: Making sense of humor, Then serring. In E.McGhee, & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research. NY: Springer-Verlag.
Graesser, C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing Inferences During Narrative Text Comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371-395.
Johnson, K. J., Waugh, C. E., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2010). Smile to see the forest: Facially expressed positive emotions broaden cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 24(2), 299-321.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2007).;Perspective effects in repeated reading: An eye movement study. Memory & Cognition, 35(6), 1323-1336.
Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. London: Hutchinson.
Kotthoff, H. (2003). Responding to irony in different contexts: on cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1387–1411.
Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Oxford: Academic Press.
Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48-75.
Nerhardt, G. (1976).Incongruity and funniness: Towards a new descriptive model. In A. J. Chapman, & H. C. Foot (Eds.). Humor and laughter: Theory, Research and applications. London: Willey.
Partala, T., & Surakka V. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 185-198.
Radach, R., Huestegge, L., & Reilly, R. (2008). The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading. Psychological Research, 72(6), 675-688.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
Rayner, K., Juhasz, B., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. (2003). Inhibition of saccade return in reading. Vision Research, 43(9), 1027-1034.
Rayner, K., & Morris, R. K. (1992). Do eye movements reflect higher order processes in reading? In H.-bgC. Chen & O. J.-L. (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 179-190). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.

Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1987). Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Eds.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp.327-362). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. NJ: Englewood Cliffs
Samson, A. C., Zysset, S., & Huber, O. (2007). Cognitive humor processing: Different logical mechanisms in nonverbal cartoons—an fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 3(2), 125-140.
Shultz, T. R. (1972). The role of incongruity and resolution in children's appreciation of cartoon humor* 1. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13(3), 456-477.
Shultz, T. R. (1974). Development of the appreciation of riddles. Child Development, 45(1), 100-105.
Shultz, T. R., & Horibe, F. (1974). Development of the appreciation of verbal jokes. Developmental Psychology, 10(1), 13-20.
Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues (pp. 81–100). New York: Academic Press.
Vaid, J., Hull, R., Heredia, R., Gerkens, D., & Martinez, F. (2003). Getting a joke: the time course of meaning activation in verbal humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1431-1449.
Wang, C. A., Tsai, J. L., Inhoff, A. W., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2009). Acquisition of linguistic information to the left of fixation during the reading of Chinese text. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(7), 1097-1123.
Wyer, R. S., & Collins, J. E. (1992). A theory of humor elicitation. Psychological Review, 99(4), 663-688.
Yen, M. H., Tsai, J. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Hung, D. L. (2008). Eye movements and parafoveal word processing in reading Chinese sentences. Memory and Cognition, 36, 1033-1045.