研究生: |
黃姿文 Hwang, Tzu-Wen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
資優學習障礙者之復原力發展歷程 The Development of Resilience in Gifted People with Learning Disabilities |
指導教授: |
于曉平
Yu, Hsiao-Ping |
口試委員: |
于曉平
Yu, Hsiao-Ping 鄒小蘭 Tsou, Shiao-lan 王宣惠 Wang, Hsuan-Hui |
口試日期: | 2024/01/08 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 246 |
中文關鍵詞: | 雙重特殊需求者 、資優 、學習障礙成人 、復原力 、敘事研究 |
英文關鍵詞: | Twice-exceptional people, Gifted, Adults with learning disabilities, Resilience, Narrative research |
研究方法: | 敘事分析 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400500 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:309 下載:8 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究為質性研究取向,使用敘事研究法及回溯研究方法,對三位資優學習障礙成人進行分析。研究者以半結構訪談方式,向資優學習障礙成人及其重要他人進行訪談,且遵守研究倫理規範之下,採用「整體-內容分析」以及「類別-內容分析」敘事分析模式進行資料分析,獲得三位研究參與者之故事與復原力發展歷程,並比對其中危險因子、保護因子與因子間之交互作用。研究發現如下:
一、 本研究的三位研究參與者的復原力發展歷程皆有經歷在診斷或鑑定之前的階段、在診斷或鑑定之後的「學習與學障共處階段」與「和解階段」。不同處之處則在於「診斷發現階段」明顯與否、「學習與學障共處但失去特教服務階段」發生與否、「和解階段」出現時間早晚。
二、 本研究將危險因子整理分析為個人及環境兩大類危險因子,個人危險因子包含學障者常見的危險因子、資優學障者常見的危險因子、心理性的危險因子;環境危險因子包含教室內的危險因子及教室外的危險因子。
三、 本研究將保護因子整理分析為個人及環境兩大類保護因子,個人的保護因子包含策略型的保護因子、情感型的保護因子;環境的保護因子包含家庭的保護因子、外在支持系統的保護因子。
四、 本研究發現有具雙重面向的特殊因子,與兩種因子之間的交互作用,包含因子之間的促進關係及因子之間的抑制關係。
最後,根據研究結果提出對資優學障學生輔導工作與後續研究的建議。
This study was qualitative research and used narrative and retrospective research methods to analyze three gifted adults with learning disabilities. The researcher conducted semi-structured interviews with the gifted adults with learning disabilities and their significant others, and in compliance with the ethical norms of the study, the data were analyzed using the "whole-content analysis" and "category-content analysis" modes of narrative analysis to analyze the data, to obtain the stories and resilience developmental histories of the three research participants, and to compare them with the followingThe study also compared the risk factors, protective factors, and interactions among the factors.
The findings of the study were as follows: 1. All three participants in this study experienced a stage of resilience development before diagnosis or identification, a stage of "co-occurring with learning disabilities" and a stage of "reconciliation" after diagnosis or identification. The differences were whether the "Diagnosis and Discovery Stage" was obvious or not, whether the "Learning with Learning Disabilities without Special Education Services Stage" occurred or not, and whether the "Reconciliation Stage" occurred at an early or late stage. 2. This study analyzed the risk factors into two major categories: personal and environmental risk factors, which are described as follows: (1) Personal risk factors include common risk factors for students with learning disabilities, common risk factors for gifted students with learning disabilities, and psychological risk factors. (2) Environmental risk factors include risk factors inside the classroom and risk factors outside the classroom. 3. In this study, the protective factors were organized and analyzed into two major categories of personal and environmental protective factors, which are described as follows: (1) Personal protective factors include strategic protective factors and emotional protective factors. (2) Environmental protective factors include family protective factors and external support system protective factors. 4. In the present study, we found that there was a specific factor with a dual orientation, and the interaction between the two factors consisted of a facilitatory and an inhibitory relationship.
Finally, based on the findings of the study, recommendations were made for counseling and follow-up research on gifted students with learning disabilities.
中文部分
于曉平、吳淑敏、吳品璇、宋明芬、林寶鈺、林靜怡、陳勇祥、陳彥瑋、陳錦雪、孫義芬、桂舒嫻、郭靜姿、張紀盈、黃葳庭、程惠玲、楊麗雪、鄒小蘭、廖盈絜、蔡明富、……、藍珮瑜(2022)。郭靜姿、陳彥瑋主編,雙重特殊需求學生的發掘與輔導。台中:教育部國民及學前教育署。
王瓊珠(2017)。學習障礙:理念與實務。台北:心理。
行政院教育部(1984)。特殊教育法。https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lglawc/lawsingle?00C4211FD51C000000000000000000A00000000200FFFFFD00^01724073120700^00000000000
行政院教育部(1997)。特殊教育法。https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lglawc/lawsingle?00C4211FD51C000000000000000000A000000002000000^01724086042200^00000000000
行政院教育部(2019)。特殊教育法。https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lglawc/lawsingle?006120633998000000000000000000A000000002FFFFFD^01724108032900^00000000000
行政院教育部(2023)。特殊教育法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0080027
行政院教育部學生事務及特殊教育司(2013)。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0080065
行政院教育部體育署(2022)。中等以上學校運動成績優良學生升學輔導辦法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0120004
吳昆壽(2008)。資優障礙學生介入服務模式初探。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊 ,271-284。
吳秉叡、余民寧、辛怡葳(2014)。正向事件解釋風格,提升式希望感與復原力之模式驗證─以學習障礙學生為例。特殊教育學報,40,1-34。
李天惠(2024)。學習障礙大學生自我決策能力與學習投入之關係研究-以科技大學為例。未出版之碩士論文,特殊教育學系,臺北。
李雪娥(2007)。資優學障生學習輔導之個案分享─以記憶策略為例。台東特教,25,11-20。
林之丞、顏瓊芬(2022)。從個體韌性到社會生態韌性—環境教育的新方向。臺灣教育評論月刊,11(8),100-108.
林麗娟(2010)。高職學習障礙學生在實習課程中之學習狀況個案研究。未出版之碩士論文,課程與教學研究所,新北。
花敬凱(2002)。資優學障生鑑定上的問題、方法與對策。資優教育季刊,85,1-10。
花敬凱(2005)。資優障礙教育的回顧與前瞻。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,289-307。
洪雅惠 (2013)。資優讀寫障礙生特質與輔導策略。資優教育季刊,129,1-7。
洪榮照、林信香(2005)。國小學習障礙學生自我概念及生活適應之研究。特殊教育與復健學報,(14),55-84。
洪儷瑜、王曉嵐、陳心怡(2021)。學習障礙。載於特殊教育導論(十四章)。台北:心理。
張春興(1991)。現代心理學。台北:東華。
張倫睿(2020)。語文型與非語文型學習障礙兒童在情緒行為問題初探。未出版之碩士論文,心理學系暨臨床心理學系,臺中。
張庭榕(2022)。國民中學藝術才能音樂班學生正念特質對其恆毅力與復原力影響之研究—以心流為中介變項。未出版之碩士論文,教育與學習科技學系,新竹。
張萬烽(2020)。保護因子對於不同復原力類型學習障礙學生之影響。特殊教育研究學刊,45(1),65-96。
張萬烽(2023)。國小學習障礙學生與一般學生自我效能、家長支持以及心理健康之縱貫研究。教育心理學報,55(1),125-151。
教育部國民及學前教育署(2021)。加強推動身心障礙資賦優異學生之發掘與輔導方案。https://www.spups.hlc.edu.tw/modules/tadnews/index.php?nsn=744
許巧宜、吳麗雪(2006)。被忽略的天才—談學障資優生的學習輔導原則。台東特教,23,44-47。
許婷(2023)。臺北市中學階段藝術才能優異學生復原力及其影響因子調查研究。未出版之碩士論文,特殊教育學系,台北。
陳勇祥(2018)。輕度自閉症資優學生失敗經驗的情感調節及復原歷程之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,43(3),29-55。
曾文志(2006)。復原力保護因子效果概化之統合分析。諮商輔導學報。高師輔導所刊,14,1-35。
曾文志、林仁祥(2021)。面對逆境的意義建構:復原力敘事模式探討。輔導季刊, 57(3),1-14。
曾瓊禛、洪儷瑜(2020)。學習障礙大學生韌性發展歷程探究。特殊教育研究學刊,45(2),61-88。
曾瓊禛、徐享良(2006)。學習障礙青少年生活壓力、自尊與憂鬱之相關研究。特殊教育學報,23,105-146。
鈕文英(1992)。資優學習障礙學生的特質、鑑定與教育。資優教育季刊,42,18-21。
鈕文英(1992)。資優學障學生的特質、鑑定與教育。資優教育季刊。
鈕文英(2020)。質性硏究方法與論文寫作(三版)。台北:雙葉出版社。
黃文慧(2002)。雙重特殊學生(2E)的研究沿流、特質與鑑定之啟示。資優教育季刊,83,10-20。
黃彥鈞(2020)。雙重特殊需求學生復原力歷程之研究。未出版之碩士論文,特殊教育學系,台北。
溫瓊怡、花敬凱(2004),資優學障生的教學與輔導。資優教育季刊,92,33-40。
鄒小蘭(2012)。校外資源開發與運用~以身心障礙資優學生為例。資優教育季刊,125,9-17。
鄒小蘭、盧台華(2009)。一名國小學習障礙資優生之優弱勢分析探討。資優教育季刊,112,8-19。
鄒小蘭、盧台華(2011)。身心障礙資優生優弱勢分析結果之探究。特殊教育學報,33,57-92。
廖敏惠(2020)。臺北市國中數理資優生復原力、父母教養方式 與完美主義類型之研究。未出版之碩士論文,特殊教育學系,台北。
廖瑩欣(2016)。大專校院學習障礙學生自我概念與學校適應之研究。未出版之碩士論文,復健諮商研究所,臺北。
盧台華(1986)。談資優兼學習障礙學生的教育。特殊教育季刊,21,10-13。
盧台華(1995)。殘障資優學生身心特質研究。特殊教育研究學刊,13,203-220。
蕭莉雯(2018)。從縱貫性研究觀點談學習障礙的復原力。特殊教育季刊,149,1-12。
韓梅玉(1993)。資優學障兒童的面面觀。資優敎育季刊,47,7-9。
藍珮瑜(2023)。以自我調節執行功能理論分析並建構資優生之情緒困擾經歷與復原力模式。未出版之碩士論文,特殊教育學系,台北。
蘇絢慧(2015)。七天自我心理學,找回原本美好的你。台北:究竟。
英文部分
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-V). American Psychiatric Association.
Barber and Mueller (2011). Social and self-perceptions of adolescents identified as gifted, learning disabled, and twice-exceptional. Roeper Review, 33, 109-120
Barber, C., & Mueller, T. C. (2011). Social and self-perceptions of adolescents identified as gifted, learning disabled, and twice-exceptional. Roeper Review, 33, 109–120.
Baum, S. (1989). Gifted but learning disabled: A puzzling paradox. Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 34(1), 11-14.
Baum, S. M., Emerick, L. J., Herman, G. N., & Dixon, J. (1989). Identification, programs and enrichment strategies for gifted learning disabled youth. Roeper Review, 12 (1), 48-53.
Beckley, D (1998). Gifted and Learning Disabled: Twice Exceptional Students. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, 2-7.
Besnoy, K. D., Swoszowski, N. C., Newman, J. L., Floyd, A., Jones, P., & Byrne, C. (2015). The advocacy experiences of parents of elementary age, twice-exceptional children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(2), 108-123.
Bland, L. C., Sowa, C. J., & Callahan, C. M. (1994). An overview of resilience in gifted children. Roeper Review, 17(2), 77-80.
Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-resiliency and ego control in the organization of behavior. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (pp. 39-101). Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
Brody, L. E., & Mills, C. J. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 282–296.
Cline, S. & Schwartz, D. (1999). Gifted children with learning problems. Diverse Populations of Gifted Children: Meeting Their Needs in the Regular Classroom and Beyond (Chapter 5). N J: Prentice-Hall.
Crepeau‐Hobson, F., & Bianco, M. (2011). Identification of gifted students with learning disabilities in a response‐to‐intervention era. Psychology in the Schools, 48(2), 102-109.
Dole, S. (2000). The implications of the risk and resilience literature for gifted students with learning disabilities. Roeper Review, 23(2), 91–96. https://0-doi.org.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/10.1080/02783190009554074
Doll, B., & Lyon, M. (1998). A. Risk and resilience: Implications for the delivery of educational and mental health services in schools. School Psychology Review, 27(3), 348-363
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York: Psychology Press.
Earvolino-Ramirez., M. (2007). Resilience: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 42(2), 73–82. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6198.2007.00070.x
Ford, D. Y. (1994). Nurturing resilience in gifted black youth. Roeper Review, 17(2), 80-85.
Gardynik, U. M., & McDonald, L. (2005). Implications of risk and resilience in the life of the individual who is gifted/learning disabled. Roeper Review, 27(4), 206-214.
Garmezy, N., & Devine, V. T. (1984). Project Competence: The Minnesota studies of children vulnerable to psychopathology. In N. Watt, J. Rolf, & E. J. Anthony (Eds.), Children at risk for schizophrenia (pp. 287–303). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garmezy, N., & Tellegen, A. (1984). Studies of stress-resistant children: Methods, variables, and preliminary findings. In F. Morrison, C. Lord, & D. Keating (Eds.), Advances in applied developmental psychology (Vol. 1 , pp. 231–287). New York: Academic Press.
Goldberg, R. J., Higgins, E. L., Raskind, M. H., & Herman, K. L. (2003). Predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: A qualitative analysis of a 20-year longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(4), 222-236. doi: 10.1111/1540-5826.00077
Goldstein, S., & Rider, R. (2005). Resilence and the disruptive disorders of childhood. In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (pp.203-222). New York: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum.
Grotberg, E. (1995). A guide to promoting resilience in children: strengthening the human spirit. The International Resilience Project. Bernard Van Leer Foundation. La Haya, Holanda. Retrieved from http://www.bibalex.org/Search4Dev/files/283337/115519.pdf
Hammill, D. D. (1990). On defining learning disabilities: An emerging consensus. Journal of learning disabilities, 23(2), 74-84.
Hébert, T. (1996). Portraits of Resilience: The urban life experience of gifted Latino young men. Roeper Review, 19(2), 82-90.
Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1995). The Nature of Learning Disabilities: Critical Elements of Diagnosis and Classification. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kline, B. E., & Short, E. B. (1991a). Changes in emotional resilience: Gifted adolescent boys. Roeper Review, 13, 184-188.
Kline, B. E., & Short, E. B. (1991b). Changes in emotional resilience: Gifted adolescent females. Roeper Review, 13, 118-121.
Luthar, S. S., & Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct ofresilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543-562.
Maddocks, D. L. (2020). Cognitive and achievement characteristics of students from a national sample identified as potentially twice exceptional (gifted with a learning disability). Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(1), 3-18.
Maddocks, D. L. (2020). Cognitive and achievement characteristics of students from a national sample identified as potentially twice exceptional (gifted with a learning disability). Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(1), 3-18.
Marland, S. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented. Report to the congress of the United States by the U.S. Government Printing office.
Masten, A. S., & Tellegen, A. (2012). Resilience in developmental psychopathology: Contributions of the project competence longitudinal study. Development and psychopathology, 24(2), 345-361.
Masten, A. S., & Wright, M. O. (2010). Resilience over the lifespan: Developmental perspectives on resistance, recovery, and transformation. In J. W. Reich, A. J. Zautra, & J. S. Hall (Eds.), Handbook of adult resilience (pp. 213-237). New York, NY: Guilford.
Masten, A. S., Best, K. M., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2(4), 425-444. doi: 10.1017/S0954579400005812
Mastoras, S. M., Saklofske, D. H., Schwean, V. L., & Climie, E. A. (2018). Social Support in Children With ADHD: An Exploration of Resilience. Journal of Attention Disorders, 22(8), 712-723. doi: 10.1177/1087054715611491Goldstein & Ride, 2005)
McCrimmon, A. W., Matchullis, R. L., Altomare, A. A., & Smith-Demers, A. D. (2016). Executive functions in autism spectrum disorder. In J. L. Matson (Ed.), Autism and child psychopathology series. Handbook of assessment and diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (pp. 403-425). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Miller, M. (1996). Relevance of resilience to individuals with learning disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 43(3), 255-269.
Miller, M., & Fritz, M. (1998). A demonstration of resilience. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33(5),265-271.
Munro, J. (2002). understanding and identifying Gifted learning disabled students. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 7(2), 20-30.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities [NJCLD] (1990). NJCLD: definition of Learning Disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.ldonline.org/pdfs/njcld/NJCLDDefinitionofLD.pdf
Orenstein, M. (2016)。被卡住的天才:用韌性釋放被禁錮的才智(許豪沖、黃秀慧譯)。台北:張老師。(原著出版於2015年)
Piers, L., & Duquette, C. A. (2016). Facilitating Academic and Mental Health Resilience in Students with a Learning Disability. ExceptionalityEducation International, 26(2), 21-41.
Renati, R., Bonfiglio, N. S., & Pfeiffer, S. (2017). Challenges raising a gifted child: Stress and resilience factors within the family. Gifted Education International, 33(2), 145-162. doi: 10.1177/0261429416650948
Richmond, J.B., & Beardslee, W.R. (1988). Resiliency: Research and practical implications for pediatricians. Journal of Developmental and BehavioralPediatrics, 9, 157-163.
Rutter, M. (1985). Resilience in the face of adversity: Protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 598—611.
Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57(3), 316-331. doi:10.1017/S0954579412000028
Rutter, M. (2012). Resilience as a dynamic concept. Development and psychopathology, 24(2), 335-344. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000028
Rutter., M. (1999). Resilience concepts and findings: implications for family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 119–144. doi: 10.1111/1467-6427.00108
Sarafino, E. P., & Smith, T. W. (2020)。健康心理學(第八版)(黃揚文等譯)。台北:洪葉。(原著出版於2014年)
Sharma, D. (2013). Academically Talented and Creatively Learning Disabled_ How They differ on Achievement Motivation and Cognitive Style. Educational Quest, 4(3), 181.
Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008).The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194–200. doi:10.1080/10705500802222972
Smith, D. D.(2010)。特殊教育導論:創造不同的人生(陳明媚、黃裕惠、莊季靜譯)。台北:學富。(原著出版於2007年)
Southwick, S. M., Bonanno, G. A., Masten, A. S., Panter-Brick, C., & Yehuda, R. (2014). Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives. European journal of psychotraumatology, 5(1), 25338.
Stankovska, G., & Rusi, M. (2014). Cognitive, Emotional and Social Characteristics of Gifted Students with Learning Disability. Bulgarian Comparative Education Society. Bulgarian.
Subotnik, R. F. & Arnold. K. D. (1994). Longitudinal study of giftedness and talent. In R. F. Subotnik, & K. D Arnold. (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 1-23). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Terman, L. M. (1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
The Yale Center for Dyslexia & Creativity (YCDC) (2022). What Parents Can Do: Suspect Dyslexia? Act Early. https://dyslexia.yale.edu/the-center/our-mission/
Trail, B. A. (2012). Improving Outcomes for 2E Children. Parenting for High Potential, 1(5), 8-10. https://0-search.proquest.com.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/docview/1646123697?accountid=14228
United States education (1994). Gifted and Talented Students Education Act.
United States education (2001). No Children Left behind. [NCLB]. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ted-Kennedy-American-senator
United States education (2006).The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act [IDEA](2006). Retrieved from https://sites.ed.gov/idea/idea-files/aug-14-2006-71-fr-46540/
Wagnild, G., & Young, H. M. (1990). Resilience among older women. The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 22(4), 252-255. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1990.tb00224.x
Werner, E. E. (1995). Resilience in development. Current directions in psychological science, 4(3), 81-84.
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A longirudinal study of resilient children and youth. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Whitmore, J. R., & Maker, J (1985) Intellectual giftedness in disabled persons. MD: Aspen Publications.
Willcutt, E. G., Betjemann, R. S., McGrath, L. M., Chhabildas, N. A., Olson, R. K., DeFries, J.C., & Pennington, B. F. (2010). Etiology and neuropsychology of comorbidity between RD and ADHD: The case for multiple-deficit models. Cortex, 46(10), 1345-1361.
Yewchuk, C., Delaney, D., Cunningham J., & Pool, J. (1992). Teaching gifted/learning disabled students: Case studies and interventions. Unpublished manuscript. Edmonton: University of Alberta.