簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 石芳萌
Shih Fang-Meng
論文名稱: 高中職學生親職化、自我分化與身心健康之相關研究
A Correlational Study on Parentification, Self-Differentiation, and Health for students in Senior High and Vocational High Schools in Taiwan
指導教授: 吳麗娟
Wu, Li-Chuan
林世華
Lin, Sieh-Hwa
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 176
中文關鍵詞: 親職化自我分化身心健康出生序父母婚姻狀況高中職學生
英文關鍵詞: parentification, self-differentiation, health, birth order, parental marital status, senior high and vocational high school students
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:230下載:128
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在發展中文版之親職化量表以及探討不同背景變項之高中職學生的親職化表現、自我分化程度、身心健康指標三者之間的關係。本研究採叢集抽樣將臺灣分為台北市、高雄市、北區、中區、南區、東區抽樣高一高二學生為研究對象,共計423名。本研究採問卷調查法進行資料收集,所使用研究工具包括「親職化量表」、「自我分化量表」與「一般健康量表」。調查所得資料分別以多變項變異數分析及典型相關分析之統計方法進行處理。本研究主要發現如下:
    一、不同性別之高中職學生的親職化表現沒有不同。不同出生序之高中職學生的親職化表現不同,主要表現在「功能性照顧」。不同父母婚姻狀況之高中職學生的親職化表現不同,主要表現在「不公平性」。

    二、高中職學生的親職化表現與身心健康指標之間有三個關係組型存在。包含:個體近似親職化表現的越多,則其身心狀況就越不健康;個體情感性照顧多,而較少不公平感受時,則其焦慮、睡眠問題及社會行為功能問題稍多,但較少憂鬱;個體功能性照顧較多時,則其身體症狀、睡眠狀況與焦慮較多,但較少社會功能障礙與憂鬱。

    三、高中職學生的親職化表現與自我分化程度之間有二個關係組型存在。包含:個體情緒照顧多,而較少不公平感受時,則其越因為父母改變自己、和父母關係較親密,但較不涉入三角關係;個體情感性照顧與不公平感受越多時,則其與父母之間越混淆、越涉入三角關係,但和同儕關係越好。

    四、高中職學生的自我分化程度與身心健康指標之間有二個關係組型存在。包含:個體自我分化程度越高,則其身心健康狀況越佳;個體越涉入三角關係,和同儕越親密,則其身體症狀、焦慮與睡眠問題、與有社會功能障礙皆越多。

    五、高中職學生的親職化表現、自我分化程度與身心健康指標之間有二個關係組型存在。包含:個體的親職化表現越低、自我分化程度越高,則其身心健康狀況越好;個體的情緒性照顧越高,和父母與同儕越親密時,則其生理、焦慮、睡眠問題、及社會功能障礙越多,但憂鬱較少。

    最後,研究者根據本研究結果加以討論,並提出具體建議,以應用在諮商輔導與親職教育方面,並作為未來研究之參考。

    The purposes of this study were to develop an instrument measuring parentification in Chinese and to investigate the relationships among parentification, self-differentiation, and health for students in senior high and vocational high schools in Taiwan. The samples are comprised of 423 students from six areas across Taiwan. Instruments used in this study were “Parentification Scale”, “Self-Differentiation Questionnaire”, and “General Health Scale”. Data obtained in this study were analyzed by MANOVAs and canonical correlation analysis. The main findings are as follows:

    1. Group differences on parentification
    No significant gender difference of parentification was found in the study. There was significant difference in “instrumental caregiving” among groups of birth order. “Unfairness” was found significant difference among students from different parental marital status.

    2. Correlation between parentification and health
    Parentification is significantly correlated with health. Three canonical correlation structures between parentification and health were found. The major one is that the students exposed more in parentification situation showed worse health.

    3. Correlation between parentification and self-differentiation
    Parentification is significantly associated with self-differentiation. Two canonical correlation structures between parentification and self-differentiation were found. The major one is that the students experienced emotional caregiving more, and unfairness less, showed more intergenerational fusion and intergenerational intimacy, less intergenerational triangulation.

    4. Correlation between self-differentiation and health
    There is significant correlation between self-differentiation and health. There are two canonical correlation structures. In general, the students who experienced self-differentiation more showed better health.

    5. Correlation among parentification, self-differentiation and health
    Parentification, self-differentiation are significantly correlated with health. There are two canonical correlation structures. In general, the students who experienced less parentification and more self-differentiation showed more positive health.

    Finally, based on the results, implications of the study for counseling and parent education as well as suggestions for future research are proposed.

    目錄 中文摘要 英文摘要 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的…………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究問題與假設…………………………………………………………9 第三節 名詞釋義…………………………………………………………………11 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 親職化概念與相關研究…………………………………………………13 第二節 親職化的測量與研究趨向………………………………………………33 第三節 自我分化的意義、相近概念與自我分化的測量………………………43 第四節 青少年自我分化與相關研究…………………………………………....57 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………………………65 第二節 研究對象…………………………………………………………………67 第三節 研究工具…………………………………………………………………68 第四節 實施程序…………………………………………………………………76 第五節 資料處理…………………………………………………………………78 第四章 研究結果與討論 第一節 不同性別、出生序、父母婚姻狀況之高中職學生在親職化表現的差異情形………………………………………………………………………79 第二節 高中職學生親職化表現與身心健康指標之典型相關結果……………90 第三節 高中職學生親職化表現與自我分化程度之典型相關結果…………..104 第四節 高中職學生自我分化程度與身心健康指標之典型相關結果………..113 第五節 高中職學生親職化表現、自我分化程度與身心健康指標之典型相關結果………………………………………………………………………121 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論……………………………………………………………………132 第二節 建議……………………………………………………………………136 參考文獻 一、中文部分…………………………………………………………………..148 二、西文部份…………………………………………………………………..152 附錄 附錄一、親職化量表修訂同意函………………………………………………….Ⅰ 附錄二、一般健康量表使用同意書……………………………………………….Ⅱ 附錄三、親職化量表信度分析結果……………………………………………….Ⅲ 附錄四、親職化量表因素分析結果……………………………………………….Ⅴ 附錄五、親職化量表因素分析結果彙整………………………………………….Ⅶ 附錄六、一般健康量表確認分析結果…………………………………………….Ⅸ 附錄七、本研究使用之研究工具………………………………………………….Ⅹ 圖表目錄 圖3-1研究架構圖…………………………………………………………………65 圖4-1高中職學生親職化表現與身心健康指標的關係組型(一)………………..91 圖4-2高中職學生親職化表現與身心健康指標的關係組型(二)………………..95 圖4-3高中職學生親職化表現與身心健康指標的關係組型(三)………………..98 圖4-4高中職學生親職化表現與自我分化程度的關係組型(一)………………105 圖4-5高中職學生親職化表現與自我分化程度的關係組型(二)………………107 圖4-6高中職學生自我分化程度與身心健康指標的關係組型(一)……………114 圖4-7高中職學生自我分化程度與身心健康指標的關係組型(二)……………116 圖4-8高中職學生親職化表現、自我分化程度與身心健康指標的關係組型(一)…………………………………………………………………………122 圖4-9高中職學生親職化表現、自我分化程度與身心健康指標的關係組型(二)…………………………………………………………………………125 表2-1國外與親職化概念相關之測量工具彙整表……………………………….33 表2-2國內與親職化概念相關之測量工具彙整表……………………………….35 表2-1國外與親職化概念相關之測量工具彙整表…………………………….…53 表2-2國內與親職化概念相關之測量工具彙整表……………………………….55 表3-1有效樣本人數分配表……………………………………………………….67 表4-1不同性別之高中職學生在親職化量表各分量表上的平均數、標準差….80 表4-2不同性別之高中職學生在親職化量表各分量表平均數差異考驗之多變項變異數分析摘要表…………………………………………………………….80 表4-3不同出生序之高中職學生在親職化量表各分量表上的平均數、標準差..83 表4-4不同出生序之高中職學生在親職化量表各分量表平均數差異考驗之多變項變異數分析摘要表……………………………………………………….…83 表4-5不同出生序之高中職學生在親職化量表各分量表平均數差異考驗之單因子變異數分析與事後比較…………………………………………………..…84 表4-6不同父母婚姻狀況之高中職學生在親職化量表各分量表上的平均數、標準差…………………………………………………………………………..…87 表4-7不同父母婚姻狀況之高中職學生在親職化量表各分量表平均數差異考驗之多變項變異數分析摘要表…………………………………………………..87 表4-8不同父母婚姻狀況之高中職學生在親職化量表各分量表平均數差異考驗之單因子變異數分析與事後比較…………………………………………..…88 表4-9高中職學生親職化量表各分量表分數與一般健康量表各分量表分數之典型相關分析摘要表……………………………………………………………..90 表4-10高中職學生親職化量表各分量表分數與自我分化量表各分量表分數之典型相關分析摘要表…………………………………………………………104 表4-11高中職學生自我分化量表各分量表分數與身心健康指標各分量表分數之典型相關分析摘要表………………………………………………………113 表4-12高中職學生親職化量表、自我分化量表各分量表分數與一般健康量表各分量表分數之典型相關分析摘要表………………………………………121

    參考文獻

    一、中文部份
    王嚮蕾(民83):原生家庭父母自我分化與青少年自我分化、焦慮之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    王黛玉(民93):高雄市國中生父母教養方式、同儕關係與憂鬱傾向之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    王覺興(民90):單親家庭子女生涯發展與抉擇歷程之質性研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
    江佩真(民84):青少年自殺企圖的影響因素及發展脈絡之分析研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    李仁宏(民92):雙親教養態度、家庭功能與青少年憂鬱傾性關係之追蹤研究。高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    李亦園、楊國樞編(民61):中國人的性格。中央研究院民族學研究所專刊乙種第四號。臺北市:中央研究院民族學研究所。
    李美枝(民90):手足與朋友關係的內涵與功能:從猩種與人種的表現看演化的藍圖與文化的加工。本土心理學研究,第16期,135-182。
    吳元蓉(民94):大學生憂鬱、人際親密與自尊之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    吳家瑜(民94):倒轉的親子位置--「親子化」兒童之相關文獻探討。輔導季刊,第41卷,第一期,21-28。
    吳麗娟(1998):父母自我分化、教養態度對青少年子女自我分化、因應策略及適應影響之研究。「教育心理學報」,30(1),91-132。
    林米庭(民95):親子關係、人際壓力因應與青少年焦慮、憂鬱情緒的探討。東吳大學心理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    林巧翊(民91):折翼與展翅~犯案少年與家庭系統相互影響歷程之探討。國立台灣大學社會工作研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    林昭溶、林惠雅(民88):國中學生親子衝突的因應歷程。本土心理學研究,11,47-101。
    林崇德(民84):高中生心理學。臺北市:心理出版社。
    胡雅婷(民94):高職女生自我分化、人際互動與憂鬱傾向之相關研究~以台北市某高職為例。中國文化大學青少年兒童福利研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    姚雅云(民94):家庭功能、自我分化與國中生非理性信念關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    栗珍鳳(民88):大學生自我分化和心理社會發展之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    張玨(民76):大專聯考壓力症候群的探討。中華民國公共衛生學會雜誌,第六卷第三期,43-55。
    張進上,郭志通(民94):客體關係治療在父母化個案之應用。輔導季刊,第41卷,第一期,29-37。
    張貝萍(民89):單親家庭青少年自我分化、情緒穩定與偏差行為相關之研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    張博雅(民93):親子三角關係與大學生親密關係適應之相關研究。淡江大學教育心理與諮商研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北縣。
    張虹雯(民87):父母爭吵時的三角關係運作與兒童行為問題之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    高明薇(民85):高中職學生自我分化與因應方式、心理健康關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    柴蘭芬(民95):高中生親子三角關係、手足關係與情緒適應之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    徐君楓(民92):大學生知覺之家庭界限與其自我分化之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    郭美岑(民86):自我分化與婚姻品質之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    陳秉華(民84)。諮商中大學生的心理分離-個體化衝突改變歷程研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系教育心理學報,28,145-176。
    陳靜宜(民90):自我分化在家庭治療理論中的意義。諮商與輔導,191期,17-20頁。
    陳瑛吟(民87):低收入戶喪父家庭對青少年期子女自我分化之影響。東吳大學社會工作研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    康維芬(民94):大學生家庭功能、父母教養方式與憂鬱傾向之關係研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    許惠雯(民95):從親子三角關係、情緒安全感探討兒童知覺父母衝突與其適應之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    單延愷(民83):青少年自殺行為危險因子與危險警訊之探討。中原大學心理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
    黃堅厚(民77):現代生活中孝的實踐。載於楊國樞(主編),中國人的心理,25-38頁。臺北市,桂冠。
    黃迺毓(民80):家庭教育。臺北市:五南。
    黃慧雯(民90):大學生的自我分化、社會活動經驗與自我認定狀態之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    曾瀞瑤(民92):醫學中心護理人員工作壓力與身心健康之相關探討。國立臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    葉光輝(民84):孝道困境的消解模式及其相關因素。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,第79期,87-118頁。
    葉光輝(民93):華人家人互動關係及其心理歷程。本土心理學研究,第22期,81-119頁。
    葉致芬(民93):孝悌楷模的家庭系統運作。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    楊國樞(民71):開放的多元社會。臺北市:東大圖書公司。
    楊朝旭(民93):高中生知覺家庭氣氛、課業壓力、同儕關係與其憂鬱傾向關係之研究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
    蔡嫈娟(民93):大學生子職知覺、親職化與子職實踐之相關研究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
    劉美娜(民92):國小高年級學童之自我分化與其父母之自我分化及共依附之探討。長庚大學護理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
    薛鈞芳(民95):大學生自我分化、愛情態度與其愛情關係中衝突因應方式之關係研究。國立暨南大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
    鍾筱萍(民92):通勤家庭中父母管教方式、親子互動關係與子女憂鬱及焦慮表現之相關。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    賈紅鶯(民80):父母自我分化、子女自我分化與子女適應水準之相關研究—Bowen家庭系統理論之驗證。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    賈紅鶯、陳秉華、楊連謙等(民92):一個結構-策略家族治療改變歷程與文化意涵。中華心理衛生學刊,16(1),71-124。
    劉姿君(民82):大學生自我認定狀態與其生涯決定程度及自我分化水準之關係研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    魏意芳(民91):出生序對教育程度影響之探究。教育社會學通訊,第41期,8-20。

    二、西文部分
    Alexander, P. C. (1992). Application of attachment theory to the study of sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and ClinicalPsychology, 60, 185-195.
    Anderson, S. A. & Fleming, W. M. (1986). Late adolescents' identity formation: individual from the family of origin. Adolescence, 21, 785-796.
    Bank, S.,& Kahn, M. D.(1982). The sibling bond. New York:Basic Books
    Barnett, B.,& Parker, G.. (1998). The parenified child: early competence or childhood depeivation. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 3(4), 146-155.
    Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monograph, 4(1), 1-103.
    Becker, S., Aldridge, J., & Dearden, C. (1998). Young carers and their families. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
    Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
    Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment ans Loss, Vol.III. Loss: Sadness and depression. London: Hogarth Press.
    Bray, J. H., Williamson, D. S., & Malone, P. E.(1984).Personal authority in the family system: Development of a questionnaire to measure personal authority in intergenerational family process. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 10,167-178.
    Bray, J. H., & Williamson, D. S. (1987). Intergenerational family relationships: An evaluation of theory and measurement. Psychotherapy, 24, 516-528.
    Bray, J. H. & Harvey, D. M. (1992).Intimacy and individuation in young adults: Development of the young adult version of the personal authority in the family system questionnaire. Psychotherapy, 24(3),516-528.
    Broszomenyi-Nagy, I., & Spark, G. M. (1973). Invisible loyalties: Reciprocity in intergenerational family therapy. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row.
    Brotherton, W. D. (1989). The Assessment of Parental Triangulation of Child. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University.
    Buchanan, C. M., Maccoby, E. E., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Caught between parents: Adolescents’ experience in divorce homes. Child Development, 43, 282-287.
    Buchholz, E. S., & Haynes, R. (1983). Sometimes I feel like a motherless child: Role reversal as a form of parental neglect. Dynamic Psychotherapy, 1, 99-107.
    Burt, A. (1992). Generation boundary distortion: Implications for object relations development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University.
    Byng-Hall, J. (2002). Relieving parentified children’s burdens in families with insecure attachment patterns. Family Process,Vol41(3),375-388.
    Carlson, E., Jacobvitz, D., & Sroufe, L. A. (1995). A development investigation of inattentiveness and hyperactivity. Child Development, 66, 37-54.
    Carpenter, M. C. (1990). A test of Bowen family systems theory: The relationship of differentiation of self and chronic anxiety. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Maryland Graduate School. (Publication NO.AAC9030867)
    Carroll,J. J., & Robison, B. E. (2000). Depression and parentification among adults as related to parental workaholism and alcoholism. Family Journal:Counseling & Therapy for Couple & Families,Vol 8(4),360-367.
    Castro, D. M., Jones, R. A., & Mirsalimi, H. (2004). Parentification and the impostor phenomenon: An empirical investigation. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 205-216.
    Clance, P. R. (1978). The impostor in high school achieving women: Dynamic and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15, 241-247.
    Chase, N. D. (1999). Burdened children:Theory,research,and treatment of parentificaion. Thousand Oaks,CA,US:Sage Publications,Inc.xiii,199.
    Chase,N. D; Deming,M. P.; & Wells, M. C. (1998). Parentification,parental alcoholism,and academic status among young adults American. Journal of Family Theropy, Vol 26(2),105-114.
    Cheek, F. E. (1964). The schizophrenogenic mother in word and deed. Family Process, 3, 155-177.
    Combrinck, G. L. (1985). A development model for family systems. Family Process, 24(2), 139-150.
    Damiani, V. B. (1999). Responsibility and adjustment in siblings of children with disabilities: Update and review. Family in Society: The journal of Contemporary Human Services, (Jan-Feb), 34-40.
    Dinkmeyer, D. C., Dinkmeyer, Jr. D. C. & Sperry L. (1987). Adlerian counseling and Psychotherapy. Merrill Publishing Company & A Bell and Howell Information Company.
    Earley, L., & Cushway, D. (2002). The parentified child. Clinical Child psychology and psychiatry, Vol. 7(2),163-178.
    Ember, C. (1973). Female task assignment and the social behavior of boys. Ethos, 1, 424-439.
    Fleming, W. M., & Anderson, S. A. (1986). Individuation from the family of origin and personal adjustment in late adolescence. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12, 311-315.
    Fogarty, T. (1974). Triangles. The Family, 1, 11-19.
    Fullinwider-Bush, N., & Jacobvitz, D. B. (1993). The transition to young adulthood: Generational boundary dissolution and female identity development. Family Process, 32(1), 87-103.
    Godsall, Jurkovic, Emshoff, Anderson, & Stanwyck (2004). Why Some Kids Do Well in Bad Situations: Relation of Parental Alcohol Misuse and Parentification to Children's Self-Concept. Substance Use and Misuse, Vol. 39, 789-809.
    Godsall, R. E., Jurkovic, G.. J., Emshoff, J., Anderson, L., & Stanwyck, D. (2004). Why some kids do well in bad situations: Relation of parental alcohol misuse and parentification to children’s self-concept. Substance Use & Misuse, 39(5), 789-809..
    Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (1996). Family therapy:An overview ( 4th ed.). New York:Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
    Gopfert, M., Webster, J., & Seeman, M.V.(1996). Parent psychiatric disorder: Distressd parents and their families. New York: Guilford Press.
    Gracer, A. D.(1993). Parentification, narcissistic vulnerability, empathy, and the choice of a helping profession. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(9-B), 4994-4995.
    Green, Hamilton & Rolling.(1986). Differentiation of self and psychiatric Diagnosis: An empirical study. Family therapy,13(2),187-194.
    Haley, J. (1976). Problem solving therapy. New York: Harper & Row.
    Held, B.S., & Bellow, D. C. (1983). A family systems approach to crisis reactions in college student. Journal of Marital and FamilyTtherapy, 9, 4,365-373.
    Jacobvitz, D. B., & Bush, N. (1996). Reconstructions of family relationships: Parent-child alliances, personal distress, and self-esteem. Developmental Psychology, 32(4), 732-743.
    Jones, R. A., & Wells, M.(1996).An empirical study of parentification and personality. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 24(2),145-152.
    Jordan, J. V. (1991). Women’s growth in connection. Empathy and self boundaries, 47-49.New York:The Guildford Press.
    Jukovic, G. J. (1997). Lost childhoods:The plight of parentified child. Philadelphia . PA,US:Brunner/Mazel,Inc,252.
    Jurkovic, G. J., & Thirkield, A. (2000). Filial Responsibility Scale- Adult . Available from Gregory Jurkovic, Dept. of Psychology, Georgia State University, 1 University Plaza, Atlanta, GA 30303.
    Jurkovic, G. J., Thirkield, A., & Morrell, R. (2001). Parentification of adult children of divorce: a multidimensional analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 30, No. 2.
    Kabat, R. (1996). A role-reversal in mother-daughter relationship. Clinical Social Work Journal, 24(3), 255-269.
    Kahana, E., Biegel, D. E., & Wykle, M. L. (1994). Family care giving across the lifespan. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Kelley, M. L., French, A., Bountress, K., Keefe, H. A., Schroeder, V., Steer, K., Fals-Stewart, W. & Gumienny, L. (2006). Parentification and family responsibility in the family of origin of adult children of alcoholics. Addicive Behaviors, 32 (4), 675-685.
    Kelly, S. D. M., Sikka, A., & Venkatesan, S. (1997). A review of research on parental disability: implications for research and counseling practice. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 41(2), 105-121.
    Kerr, M. E., & Bowen, M., (1988). Family evaluation. New York: Norton..
    Kohut, H. (1971). Analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press.
    Kramer, J. R.(1985). Family interfaces: Transgenerational Patterns. New York: Brunner/ Mazel.
    Krikorian, S. E. (1990). The relationship between level of differentiation from the family of origin and career decision-making among college student. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology Los Angeles.
    Macobby, E.E., & Martin, J.A. (1983). Socialization in the content of the family: Parent-child interaction. In P.H. Mussen (Ed). Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality and social development, Vol.4. New York: Willey.
    Mahler, M., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.
    Markus, H. R., & Kitayama S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and movitation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
    Martin, M. T.(1996). Mother-daughter relations in divorced families : Parentification and internalizing and relationship problems. Dissertation Abstracts International. 56(9-B), 5176.
    Mayseless, O., Bartholomew, K., Henderson, A., & Trinke, S. (2004). “I was more her Mom than she was mine:” Role reversal in a community sample. Family Relations, 53, 78-86.
    Mika, P., Bergner, R., & Baum, M. C. (1987). The development of a scale for assessment of parentification. Family Therapy, 14, 229-235.
    Minuchin, S., Montalvo, B., Guerney, B. G., Rosman, B., & Schumer, F. (1967). Families of the slums. New York: Basic Books.
    Mullis, F., & Berger, M. (1981). The utility of Bowen’s theory of family therapy for school counselors. The School Counselor, 28, 195-201.
    Murphey, E. B., Silber, E., Coelho, G. V., Hamburg, D. A., & Greenberg, I. (1963). Development of autonomy and parent-child interaction in the late adolescence. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 33, 643-652.
    Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (1991). Family therapy: Concept and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Olson, M., & Gariti, P.(1993). Symbolic loss in horizontal relating: defining the role of parentifivation in addictive/ destructive relationships. Contemporary Family Therapy,15(3).
    Orbell, S., Hopkins, N., Gilles, B., & Ungerson, C. (1993). Measuring the impact of informal care. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 3(2), 149-153.
    Papero, D. V.(1990). Bowen family systems theory. Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
    Peek, C. J., & Trezona, P. (1984). The caretaker syndrome: A matter of status and eligibility. Family Therapy, 22(3), 157-164.
    Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1960). The child’s conception of geometry. New York: Basic Books.
    Pola, L. E. (1993). Parentification level as predictor of self esteem and academic achievement in hispanic children. Dissertation Abstracts International, B 54(3), 1695.
    Pottor, S. H. (1998). The cultural construction of emotion in rural Chinese social life. Ethos, 16, 181-208.
    Robinson, B. E., & Kelly, L. (1998). Adult children of workaholics: self-concept, anxiety, depression, and locus of control. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 26, 35-50.
    Rolland, J. S. (1999). Parental illness and disability: A family systems framework. Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 242-266.
    Sessions, M. W. (1986). Influence of parentification on professional role choice and interpersonal style. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 5066.
    Sessions, M. W., & Jurkovic, G. J. (1982). The Parentification Questionnaire. Available from Gregory Jurkovic, Dept. of Psychology, Georgia State University, 1 University Plaza, Atlanta, GA 30303.
    Stein, J., Riedel, M., & Rptheram-Borus, M. J.(1999). Parentification and its impact on adolescent children of parents with AIDS. Family Process, 38, 193-208.
    Stutman, S. S. (1984). Family life circle development: Examination of the pathway linking differentiation from the family of origin, marital adjustment, child-focused triangulation, and adolescent adjustment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carolina School of Professional Psychology. (Publication NO.AAC 8508452).
    Tompkins, T. L. & Dendere, C. (2007). Mother and Adolescent Reports of Parentification: Patterns of Association with Youth Adjustment. APS 2007 Poster Handout.
    Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    Valleau, P. M., Raymond, M. B., & Horton, C. B.(1995). Parentification and caretaker syndrome: An empirical investigation. Family Therapy, 22(3), 157-164
    Wallerstein, J. S. (1985). The overburdened child: Some long-term consequences of divorce. Social Work, 30, 116-123.
    Wells,M.,& Jones,R. (1998). Relationship among childhood parentification, splitting, and dissociation: Preliminary findings.The American. Journal of Family Theropy, Vol 26(4),331-339.
    Wells, M., & Jones, R.(2000). Childhood parentification and shame-proneness: A preliminary study. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 28,19-27.
    Wells, M., & Miller, R. (2001). High performance, parentification, and personality development from an object relations perspective. In B. E. Robinson & N. D. Chase (Eds.), High performing families: Causes, consequences and clinical solutions, 95-127.
    Wells, M.; Glickauf-Hughes, C., & Jones, R.(1999). Codenpendency:A Cross Roots Construct’s Relationship to Shame-Proneness,Low Self-Esteem,and Childhood Parentification. The American Journal of Family Theropy, Vol 27(1),63-71.
    West, M. L., & Keller, A. E. R. (1991). Parentification of the child: A case study of Bowlby’s compulsive care-giving attachment pattern. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 45(3), 425-431.
    Weiss, R. S. (1979). Growing up a little faster: The experience of growing up in a single parent household. Journal of Social Issues, 35, 97-111.
    Williamson, D. S. (1982). Personal authority in the family experience via termination of the intergenerational hierarchical boundary: Part III- Personal authority defined,and the power of play in the change process. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8, 309-323.
    Wolkin, J. R. (1984). Childhood parentification: An exploration on long-term effects. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 2707.
    Wright, S. E. (1985). An existential perspective on differentiation/ fusion: Theoretical issues and clinical applications. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11, 35-46.

    QR CODE