研究生: |
陳弘寬 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
亞洲「國家圖書館」網站資訊架構好用性之比較研究 |
指導教授: | 謝建成 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖書資訊學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 95 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 163 |
中文關鍵詞: | 國家圖書館網站 、資訊架構 、好用性評估 、啟發式評估 、好用性測試 |
英文關鍵詞: | the website of the National Library, information architecture, usability evaluation, heuristic evaluation, usability testing |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:204 下載:47 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
國家圖書館網站是實體圖書館的延伸,提供多元而豐富的資訊服務,也是圖書館現今對外重要的服務與行銷管道。由於圖書館網站資訊架構對使用者獲取資訊及其滿意度影響甚大,網站是否讓使用者順利取得所需資訊,是相當值得注意的問題。因此本研究透過國內外現有文獻之分析探討,瞭解資訊架構之內涵及好用性評估之目的、過程及其成效,並針對亞洲五個國家之國家圖書館網站,實際進行網站資訊架構好用性評估。
本研究採用啟發式評估法與好用性測試兩種網站好用性評估方法,檢視目前亞洲五個國家圖書館網站好用性。首先透過啟發式評估法了解圖書館網站資訊架構功能性,繼而藉由實際觀察好用性測試受試者使用圖書館網站操作任務,從中瞭解受試者對於網站使用狀況及相關意見。研究結果發現五個圖書館網站資訊架構在組織、導覽、標示、檢索四個方面各有優劣之處,所以學習其他國家圖書館網站之設計及服務內容將有助於改善網站資訊架構。藉由好用性評估亦可發現適度的網頁版面設計有助於提升網站資訊架構的好用性,而資訊架構與網站是否好用有密不可分的關係,舉凡網站內容分類組織方式、標示命名、導覽系統的設計及檢索功能的提供皆是如此,所以圖書館網站應建置完善的資訊架構系統,讓使用者更容易取用圖書館的豐富資源。
本研究最後依據研究結果除了針對五個圖書館網站資訊架構建置提出具體建議外,另外還有四項建議:一、建置以使用者導向的網站內容組織、提供順暢的瀏覽環境、網頁配置應有一致性設計,以利於學習使用、讓網站的使用有效率;二、加強資料庫整合查詢的功能;三、運用新興科技,加強個人化服務;四、定期進行網站使用評估。
The website of the National Library, offering pluralistic and abundant information services, can be thought not only as an extension to the substantial library , but also as an important channel to offer services and sales. As a matter of fact, the information architecture of the library website greatly influences users’ access to their needed information, and using satisfaction; in other words, it is a rather important issue whether the website can smoothly offer users’ needed information. Through the related domestic and foreign papers, I would like to research into the actual function of information architecture, the purpose of usability evaluation, process, and effect. Simultaneously, I chose 5 web- sites of national libraries from 5 Asian countries to undertake their usability evaluation.
Two methods of usability evaluation--- heuristic evaluation and usability testing, were adopted to inspect the above-mentioned 5 websites. First, the heuristic evaluation was implemented to understand the function of their information architecture, and then the usability testing was introduced to observe the actual function and to obtain related opinions from testing users.The research revealed the information architecture of the above 5 websites possessed different strong points and weak points, including in the fields of organization, navigation, labeling, and search. Therefore, it is helpful and instrumental to improve the information architecture of a web- site by making reference to those previously established in other countries, especially in the fields of website design and service contents. Additionally, by making use of usability evaluation, we find that proper designs of home pages can surely enhance the usability of information architecture in a website. There is a close correlation between information architecture and the usability of a website, including its organization, labeling, navigating design, searching design, and so on. So, the information architecture in any library’s website should be well established, and users can more easily have access to its abundant information.
Besides delivering my substantial suggestion for improving the information architecture in the above 5 websites, I have 4 more suggestions as follows:
(1)the website’s contents, organization, smoothly viewing surroundings, the agreement of home page designs should be oriented toward users, and the website will be easily learned, and effectively used;(2)To strengthen the integration of different data banks;(3)To strengthen personal services by utilizing the new technology; and finally(4)To periodically evaluate the use of a website.
王振鵠(1996)。國家圖書館。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典(中冊)。臺北市:漢美。
王梅玲(2005)。英美與亞太地區圖書資訊學教育。臺北市:文華圖書館管理。
王錫璋(1998)。圖書館資訊的利用。臺北市:臺灣書店。
許銀雄、何祖鳳、詹榮昌(2003)。網站人機界面好用性評估方法之比較。銘傳學刊,13,25-42。
許嫚婷(2002)。一個新課題:圖書館網頁之設計。國立臺灣師範大學圖書館通訊,53,2-7。
黃朝盟(2001)。電子化政府的網站設計與評估。臺北市:韋伯文化。
葉乃靜(2000)。中英國家圖書館之比較研究。中國圖書館學會會報,64,91-102。
蔡維君(2005)。大學圖書館網站好用性評估:以臺灣大學圖書館網站為例。未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
蕭佳祥(2003)。大學圖書館網站使用者介面設計之評估研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺中市。
謝寶煖(2004)。大學圖書館網站資訊組織之研究。在淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系主辦,2004年現代資訊組織與檢索研討會,臺北縣淡水鎮。
謝寶煖、周秉貞(2004)。政府網站資訊架構之評估。管理與系統,11,175-198。
謝寶煖、翁惠娟(1999)。大學圖書館網站內容分析。圖書與資訊學刊,31,31-36。
藍素華(2001)。大學圖書館網站資訊架構好用性之研究:以國立臺灣大學圖書館網站為例。未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
魏澤群(2005)。使用者最大:從優使性(Usability)出發的網站設計原則。臺北市:網奕資訊科技。
Campbell, N. (2001). Usability assessment of library-related web sites: Methods and case studies. Chicago: LITA.
Charles A. Goodrum (1986). National libraries.ALA world encyclopedia of library and information service 2nd ed. Chicago:American Library Association.
Deniese Pierotti (1995). Heuristic evaluation-a system checklist. Retrieved October 25, 2006, from http://www.stcsig.org/usability/topics/articles/he-checklist.html
Dickstein, R., & Mills, V. (2000). Usability testing at the University of Arizona Library: How to let the users in on the design. Information Technology and Libraries, 19(3), 144-151.
Doss, G. (2002). Designing effective web navigation. Retrieved July 31, 2007, from http://www.gdoss.com/knowledge/web_navigation6.htm
Farnum, Chris. (2002). Information architecture: Five things information managers need to know. Information management journal, 36 (5): 33-40.
Genius, S. K. (2004). Web site usability testing: a critical tool for libraries. Feliciter, 50(4), 161-164.
Head, Alison. (1999). Design wise: A guide for evaluating the interface design of information resources. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
IFLA (2004). Activities & services:National libraries section.IFLANET. Retrieved November 30, 2006, from http://www.ifla.org/VII/s1/snl.htm
ISO (2003). Information and documentation:International library statistics.Informational stanandard:ISO 2789 3rd ed.Geneva:ISO.
John Lor,Peter (1996). Guideline for legislation for national library service.Paris:UNESCO.
Kat Hagedorn (2000). Information architecture glossary. Retrieved July 31, 2007, from http://courses.iicm.tugraz.at/iaweb/iaweb.pdf
Keith Andrews. (2006). Information architecture and web usability. Retrieved November 12, 2006, from http://courses.iicm.tugraz.at/iaweb/iaweb.pdf
Lynch, P., & Horton, S. (2002). Web style guide. Retrieved November 10, 2006, from http://www.webstyleguide.com/
Mark Fischetti. (1997). Five rules for mapping information so others can find their way. Retrieved August 2, 2007, from http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/10/blueprint.html
McMullen, S. (2001). Usability testing in a library web site redesign project. Reference Service Review, 29(1), 7-22.
McMullen, S. (2005). Usability testing in a library web site redesign project. Retrieved October 1, 2006, from http://library.rwu.edu/usability/usable.html
Miranda G. Capra (2006). Description and the evaluator effect in usability testing. Ph.D. diss., University of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston: Academic Press.
Nielsen, J. (1994). Characteristics of usability problems found by heuristic evaluation. Retrieved October 17, 2006, from http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/usability_problems.html
Nielsen, J. (1994). How to conduct a heuristic evaluation. Retrieved November 5, 2006, from http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_evaluation.html
Nielsen, J. (1994). Ten usability heuristics. Retrieved November 7, 2006, from http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html
Nielsen, J. (2000). Heuristic evaluation. Retrieved October 25, 2006, from http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/
Nielsen, J. (2000). Why you only need to test with 5 users. Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html
Nielsen, J. (2003). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Retrieved October 19, 2006, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030825.html.
Nielsen, J., & Mack, R. L. (1994). Usability inspection methods. New York:Wiley.
Pearrow, M. (2000). Web Site Usability Handbook. Rockland, Mass. Charles River Media, Inc.
Reiss, E. L. (2000). Practical information architecture:A hands-on approach to structuring successful websites. England:Addison Wesley.
Rosenfeld, L. (2000). Information architecture practice: An interview with Lou Rosenfeld. Bulletin of the american society for information science, 26(6), 19-21.
Rosenfeld, L. and Morville, P. (2002). Information architecture for the World Wide Web. Calif.:O'Reilly.
Prown, S. (1999). Detecting ‘broke’: Usability testing of library websites. Retrieved October 18, 2006, from http://www.library.yale.edu/~prowns/nebic/nebictalk.html
Powell, T. A. (2000). Web designing: The complete reference. Calif.:McGraw Hill..
R. E. Wyllys (2000). Information architecture. Retrieved November 23, 2006, from http://mahasiswa.if.itb.ac.id/~if23015/bahan%20kuliah%20smt%202/Zachman/Information%20Architecture.htm
Shel Kimen (2003). 10 questions about information architecture. Retrieved August 2, 2007, from http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-22-5074224.html
Shelley Gullikson et al (1999). The impact of information architecture on academic web site usability.The Electronic Library, 17(5) , 293–304
臺灣國家圖書館。上網時間:95年9月1日。http://www.ncl.edu.tw/
日本國會圖書館。上網時間:95年9月5日。http://www.ndl.go.jp/en/index.html
中國國家圖書館。上網時間:95年9月14日。http://www.nlc.gov.cn/GB/channel1/index.html
新加坡國家圖書館。上網時間:95年9月3日。http://www.nlb.gov.sg/
韓國國家圖書館。上網時間:95年9月16日。http://www.nl.go.kr/
九十四年度行政機關網站評獎指標。上網時間:95年11月20日。http://www.a-site.nat.gov.tw/plan094.html