研究生: |
邱瑀庭 CHIU, YU-TING |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
社群媒體在經歷腫瘤治療過程中的角色—以七位青年為例 The Role of Social Media Throughout seven young people' s Tumor treatment Journeys |
指導教授: |
王永慈
Wang, Yeong-Tsyr |
口試委員: | 童伊迪 莊登閔 |
口試日期: | 2021/07/26 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
社會工作學研究所 Graduate Institute of Social Work |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 156 |
中文關鍵詞: | 社群媒體 、腫瘤 、癌症 、疾病適應 、社群媒體經營 |
英文關鍵詞: | social media, tumor, cancer, disease adaptation, social media management |
研究方法: | 現象學 、 深度訪談法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101029 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:168 下載:36 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
社群媒體為人們日常生活中一個自由分享與抒發心情的地方,但是當疾病變成生活的一部分時,要如何才能克服內心的屏障和外界明顯區隔的疾病經驗,研究中所指的疾病為惡性腫瘤(以下文中簡稱癌症),當罹患癌症此類型的重症時,我們很難向外人開口,卻有一群人願意將自身的悲傷經驗公開於大眾分享。故本研究以「當疾病變生活」為主題,依據現象學之精神採取探索性研究,以半結構式訪談形式進行資料蒐集,並以質性研究方法做資料分析,探討這些抗癌經驗豐富的社群媒體經營者的經驗與其生活轉變後的適應以了解分享者的動機與心境。
本研究問題如下:一、社群媒體對社群媒體經營者在罹癌前的意義?二、何種契機促使其運用社群媒體分享罹癌後的生病經驗?三、分享抗癌經驗的歷程有哪些不同階段?運用社群媒體在不同生命階段的意義如何?
本研究共收案七位,年齡介於20~40歲,屬於青年階段曾經罹患癌症現已康復處於穩定控制期的社群媒體經營者進行深度訪談。受訪者皆有經歷罹癌前後、分享到社群媒體、以及後期心態上的轉變這三階段,並從這三階段中整理出社群媒體的重要性與角色。研究發現病友能透過社群媒體分享找到自我價值,也因為身邊的親友鼓勵更有勇氣去面對社群媒體經營的一切困難,我們也在這其中發現同理心是社會發展的一項關鍵。
期許這份研究能帶給更多人勇氣與信心來面對生命中的負向經驗,更珍惜生命的存在,也能提供社會工作者與醫療工作者在疾病歷程中一項參考。
Social media is a platform for people to freely share and express their feelings in their daily lives. However, when diseases become a part of life, how can people overcome the inner barrier, the apparently separated disease experience, and stress of not being understood by the outside world? The disease referred to in this research is malignant Tumor (hereinafter referred to as cancer), When suffering from a serious illness such as this type of cancer, it is difficult for us to speak to other outsiders, but there is a group of people who are willing to share their sad experiences during this hard time with the public, “and let their lives be shared on social media”.
Therefore, this research takes "When the disease becomes life" as the theme, by adopting exploratory research based on the spirit of phenomenology, collecting data in the form of semi-structured interviews, and analyzing the data with qualitative research methods to explore these organizations with rich anti-cancer experience.
To understand the experience of social group media operators how and their adaptation after life changes and regain to understand the motivation of life and mood of the sharers.
The research questions are as follows:
1. What does social media mean to social media operators before cancer?
2. What kind of opportunity prompted them to use social media and to share their experience of illness after contracting cancer?
3. What are the different stages in the journey of sharing anti-cancer experience? What is the significance of using social media at different stages of life?
A total of seven cases were accepted in this study, who were between the ages of 20 and 40, who belonged to social media operators who had suffered from cancer in their youth and have recovered and now are in stable control for in-depth interviews. The respondent’s social media operators interviewed have all experienced three stages: Accept the fact of having cancer before and after cancer, sharing on social media, and the later mentality changes, and sorted out the importance and role of social media from these three stages.
Studies have found that patients can find their self-worth through social media sharing, and because their relatives and friends encourage them with more courage to face all the difficulties of social media management, we have also discovered that the importance of empathy is a key part of social development.
It is hoped that this research will bring more people the courage and confidence to face the negative experience in life, cherish the existence of life more, and provide more reference for social workers and medical workers in the course of disease.
中文文獻
Crossley, M. L.(2004)。敘事心理與研究:自我、創傷與意義的建構Introducing Narrative Psychology〔朱儀羚、康萃婷、柯禧慧、蔡欣志、吳芝儀譯〕。濤石文化。(原著出版年:2000)
中華民國刑法(民國110年 06 月 16 日)修正公布。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=C0000001
伊麗莎白.庫伯勒.羅斯、大衛.凱斯樂(2006)。當綠葉緩緩落下On Grief and. Grieving〔張美惠譯〕。張老師文化。(原著出版年:2005)
李易駿(2017)。當代社區工作五版。雙葉。
汪文聖(2001)。現象學方法與理論之反思:一個質性方法之介紹。應用心理研究,(12),49-76。
社工師倫理守則(民國108年 05月 07日)修正公布。https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bIU-YB6qZGZ0L9ktTkB3SROp_pr-WkbZ/view
洪健翔(2019)。學術研究倫理教育課程練習題庫。臺灣學術倫理教育資源中心。
科技部臺灣傳播調查資料庫(2021年06月30日)。男女使用「社群媒體」行為大不同?。科技部傳播調查資料庫電子報。第221期。https://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/epaper/第221期20210630.htm
胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流。
徐士傑、邱兆民、洪郁雯、陳儷慧(2013)。影響個人提供線上社會支持因子之探討: 以 PTT 癌症板為例。中山管理評論,21(3),511-544。
高淑清(2000)。質的研究方法。麗文文化。
郭戎晉(2009)。初探「網路霸凌」(Cyber Bullying)衍生之法律議題。科技法律透析,15-20。
郭淑珍(2013)。網路對癌症病友疾病經驗的影響。臺灣醫學人文學刊,(1&2),85-107。
郭麗馨(2001)。生病陪伴歷程的體驗-一個兒癌母親的自述〔碩士論文,南華 大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailPrint?DocID=U0001-2101200722244700
陳向明(2009)。社會科學質的研究。五南。
陳玠甫(2017)。線上健康社群社會資本之效應〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0001-0408201711420400
曾憲立、洪永泰、朱斌妤、黃東益、謝翠娟(2018)。多元民意調查方法的比較研究,調查研究,41,87-117。
童伊迪(2014)。找尋生命的希望:重症海洋性貧血病患疾病適應之研究。臺大社會工作學刊,(29),243-279。
黃夙賢、林炳憲(2010)。部落客好友關係之社會網路分析-以無名小站創作圖像分類為例。電子商務研究,8(2),209-230。
溫信學(2016)。同病互助力量相伴-漫談病友家長團體的力與美。中華民國兒童癌症基金會會訊,134,4-7。
萬文隆(2004)。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育月刊,37(4),17-23。
劉雨涵(2018)。你follow她了嗎?Instagram網紅的人類學觀察。中央研究院民族學研究所資料彙編,(26),1-34。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。心理。
鄭凱芸(2019)。癌症照顧領域社會工作。財團法人癌症希望基金會。
穆佩芬(1996)。現象學研究法。護理研究,4(2),195-201。
蕭文龍、郭庭伊(2010)。部落客持續使用部落格之研究:以整合期望確認、科技接受模式和個人因素觀點探討。電子商務學報,12(2),221-250。
闕瑞紋(2001)。臺灣網路族群醫療保健網站使用行為初探〔碩士論文,國立陽明大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文加值系統。https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22089YM000599012%22.&searchmode=basic
證券期貨市場相關公會雲端運算、社群媒體、行動裝置資訊安全管控指引(民國 103 年 08 月 20 日)修正公布。https://www.lawbank.com.tw/treatise/lawrela.aspx?lsid=FL082923&ldate=20140820&lno=8,9,10,11
英文文獻
Bernhardt, J. M., & Hubley, J. (2001). Health education and the Internet: the beginning of a revolution. Health Education Research, 16(6), 643-645.
Bradford, R. (2002). Children, families and chronic disease: Psychology models and methods of care. Routledge Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203130537
Chin, R. (2000). The Internet: another facet to the paradigm shift in healthcare. Singapore Medical Journal, 41(9), 426-429.
Cline, R. J. W., & Haynes, K.M. (2001). Consumer health information seeking on the internet: the state of the art. Health Education Research, 16(6), 671-692.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five. traditions〔Ebook〕. Sage Publications. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=DLbBDQAAQBAJ&dq=Creswell,+J.+W.(1998).+Qualitative+inquiry+and+research+design:+choosing+among+five+traditions.+London:+Sage+Publications.&lr=&hl=zh-TW&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Cutrona, C. E. and Suhr, J. A. (1992). Controllability of Stressful Events and. Satisfaction with Spouse Support Behaviors. Communication Research, 19(2), 154-174.
Diaz, Joseph A. (2002). Patients' use of the Internet for medical information. Journal of General Internal Medicine,17,180-85.
Fox, S., & Rainie, L. (2000). The Online Health Care Revolution: How the Web. Helps Americans Take Better Care of Themselves. A Pew Internet and American Life Project Online Report. http://www. pewinternet. org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Health_Report. pdf.
Hardey, M. (1999). Doctor in the house: the internet as a source of lay health. knowledge and the challenge to expertise. Sociology of Health & Illness, 21(6), 820-835.
Hardey, M. (2002). The story of my illness’: personal accounts of illness on the Internet. Health, 6(1), 31-46.
Hilton (2009). Disclosing a cancer diagnosis to friends and family: a gendered. analysis of young men's and women's experiences. Qualitative Health Research,19,744-54.
Houston, T-K., & Allison, J. J. (2002). Users of Internet information: differences by health status. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 4(2), e7.
James, N., Daniels, H., Rahman, R., McConkey, C., Derry, J., & Young, A. (2007). A study of information seeking by cancer patients and their carers. Clinical Oncology, 19(5), 356-362.
Jenkins, V., Fallowfield, L., & Saul, J. (2001). Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. British Journal of Cancer, 84(1), 48-51.
Lee, C-J., Gray, S. W., & Lewis, N. (2010). Internet use leads cancer patients to be active health care consumers. Patient Education and Counseling, 81(S1), 63-69.
Merckaert, Y. (2010). Cancer patients' desire for psychological support: prevalence. and implications for screening patients' psychological needs. Psycho-Oncology,19,141-49.
NASW, ASWB, CSWE, & CSWA (2017). Standards for Technology in Social Work. Practice. National Association of Social Workers.
https://www.socialworkers.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=lcTcdsHUcng%3D&portalid=0&fbclid=IwAR3TqmIZ8BBb7QhEr1KlYrfcCbey_uUMYuuFsjo3jVo0HNeOKv9B-oBLk_E
Poensgen, A., & Larsson, S. (2001). Patients, Physicians, and the Internet: Myth, Reality, and Implications. Boston Consulting Group.
Radin, P. (2006). “To me, it’s my life": Medical communication, trust, and activism. in cyberspace. Social Science and Medicine,62(3), 591-601.
Samson, A., Siam, H., & Lavigne, R. (2007). Psychosocial adaptation to chronic. illness: Description and illustration on an integrated task-based model. Interventions, 127, 16-28.
Sandaunet, A-G. (2008a). A space for suffering? Communicating breast cancer in an. online self-help context. Qualitative Health Research, 18(12), 1631-1641.
Sandaunet, A-G. (2008b). The challenge of fitting in: non-participation and withdrawal from an online self-help group for breast cancer patients. Sociology of Health and Illness, 30(1), 131–144.
Sharf, B. F. (1997). Communicating breast cancer online: support and empowerment. on the Internet. Women & Health, 26(1), 65-84.
Ziebland, S. (2004). The importance of being expert: the quest for cancer information. on the Internet. Social Science and Medicine, 59(9), 1783-1793.
網路資料
Facebook (2019, April 10). Writing Facebook’s Rulebook. Facebook. https://about.fb.com/news/2019/04/insidefeed-community-standards-development-process/
有病供三小(無日期)。首頁〔Facebook網頁〕。Facebook。2021年05月15日,取自https://www.facebook.com/fxxckingSick
吳沛真(2019年12月26日)。2019年臺灣網路報告。財團法人臺灣網路資訊中心。https://www.twnic.net.tw/doc/twrp/201912a.pdf
我們都有病(無日期)。首頁〔Facebook網頁〕。Facebook。2021年05月15日,取自https://www.facebook.com/groups/178862292709830
臺灣社會工作專業人員協會 TASW(2021年07月16日)。社會工作倫理與科技使用。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/fansTASW/posts/4192333254167835
辭掉工作去旅行(2016年08月27日)。一分鐘讀懂:新媒體、自媒體和傳統媒體。每日頭條。https://kknews.cc/media/v6mg54.html
蘇怡文(2017年05月01日)。八成以上臺灣人愛用Facebook、Line坐穩社. 群網站龍頭 1人平均擁4個社群帳號,年輕人更愛YouTube和IG。財團法人資訊工業策進會創新應用服務研究所〔創研所〕。https://www.iii.org.tw/Press/NewsDtl.aspx?nsp_sqno=1934&fm_sqno=14