我國近年來，積極推廣以社區為主體的防救災體系及以學校為主體的防災教育課程訓練，希望強化地方基層之防救災能量及家庭社區的防災觀念，落實防災工作。然而，這些防災計畫多屬短期性的示範計畫，在配套措施不足與缺乏後續運作機制的情況下，參與計畫之學校、社區往往難以獨立自主運作。各社區在進行防災工作時常喪失對工作目標的堅持與反省，防災社區工作完成後，居民的防災組織工作隨之解散，若能在建立防災社區這個過程中，融入教育的精神，則學校及社區的防災工作，將能持之以恆。本研究探討學校與社區建立防災夥伴關係之過程，並發現使學校成為社區的防災中心，是建立災害管理的基礎工作。
本研究的研究場域是兩所新北市的國小，研究的焦點是兩所個案學校與各自社區防災夥伴關係的實踐與意義，本研究透過個案研究了解「防災夥伴關係」之理念，是以提升雙方防災素養及加強災害管理為目標，並了解不同社區背景條件下，影響「防災夥伴關係」建立與維持的因素，運用防災意識、雙向溝通、相互參與、防災資源共享及共同舉辦防災演練等合作策略，使雙方在建立與維持防災夥伴關係，達到有效率之災害管理合作。

In recent years, Taiwan has been actively promoting community-based disaster prevention and mitigation systems and school-based disaster prevention and mitigation education/curriculum training, for strengthening the capacity and enhancing the concept regarding disaster prevention and mitigation of local communities and schools.
However, the disaster prevention projects are mostly short-term and exemplary ones. Lacking supporting measures and follow-up operations, it’s hard for schools and communities to work independently. Communities can hardly be persistent, which means they tend to lose their goals while conducting the disaster prevention and mitigation projects. Local resident organizations cannot survive for long after these projects were finished. Nevertheless, incorporation of education can potentially make the capacity of disaster prevention of the schools and communities more sustainable. The study is to analyze the establishment of the disaster-prevention partnership of schools and communities. It was found that schools being the centers of disaster prevention can help build the basis of community based disaster management.
This is a qualitative case study that included two elementary schools and their surrounding communities in New Taipei City, Taiwan as the research sites. This study explored the meaning of disaster prevention partnership between schools and communities, focusing on how schools and communities cooperated to carry out disaster prevention and rescue exercises. The results of this case study showed that the idea of “Disaster Prevention Partnership” was realized by promoting the disaster prevention and mitigation literacy in schools and communities as well as strengthening the community-based disaster management. Moreover, different social backgrounds of communities might affect the establishment and maintenance of the disaster prevention partnership. To strengthen the disaster prevention partnership between schools and communities, strategies such as raising the public awareness of disaster prevention, enhancing mutual communication between schools and communities, increasing mutual participation in disaster prevention events, establishing networks of and sharing disaster prevention resources, and holding disaster prevention drills can be employed to build a sustainable and collaborative disaster management system.

中文文獻
王文科、王智弘（2009）。教育研究法。臺北市：五南。
內政部消防署（2013）。消防署災害防救深耕 5 年中程計畫。取自： http://www.nfa.gov.tw/main/Unit.aspx?ID=&MenuID=644&ListID=3217
災害防救法（1990年7月19日）。
李政賢、廖志桓、林靜如（2007）(U. Flick著)。質性研究導論。台北：五南。(原著為2002年版)。
吳芝儀、李奉儒譯（1995）(M.Q. Patton著)。質的評鑑與研究。台北：桂冠。(原著為1990年版)。
吳宗立（1997）。學校行政研究。高雄：復文。
吳杰穎（2007）。社區防災推動之探討-以「社區防救災總體營造計畫」為例。社區發展季刊，116，213-231。
吳俊憲（2008）。建立學校－社區教育夥伴關係：途徑與挑戰。國教之友，587，16-22。
林振春（1996）。學校社區化與社區終身學習體系的建構。台灣教育，551，41-45。
林振春（1999）。台灣社區教育發展之研究。師大書苑，1999，3，56~59。
林明地（2002）。學校與社區關係。台北：五南。
尚榮安（譯）（2001）。R. K. Yin 著。個案研究（Case study research: Design and methods）。台北：弘智。
邱婉麗（2003）。學校與社區資源互享互惠之研究-以嘉義市國小為例。國立中正大學教育學研究所碩士論文，未出版。嘉義。
教育部（2011）。教育部防災科技教育歷年成果冊（92-99 年），教育部防災科技教育深耕實驗研發計畫成果報告(編號： 9789860272000)。臺北市：教育部。
教育部（2011），100年度區域防災教育服務團計畫(北區)期末報告。臺北市：教育部。
教育部（2012），101年度區域防災教育服務團計畫(北區)期末報告。臺北市：教育部。
教育部（2013）。102 年度「防災教育」統合視導訪視項目。（2013年12月18日）。
徐宗國譯（1997）。質性研究概論。台北：巨流。
張麗雀（2011）。都會區與鄉村區國小設置社區多功能學習中心角色與功能之比較研究。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文，未出版。台北。
黃世孟、李永展（1996）。國民學校與鄰近社區資源共享模式之研究。中華民國都市計劃學會。未出版。
黃松林、郭銀漢、楊秋燕、汪中華（2012）。社區復原韌性與社會工作災害重建的關係。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊，2(1)，2-28。
黃淑卿（2006）。國民小學學校與社區夥伴關係之個案研究。國立臺中教育大學國民教育研究所碩士班碩士論文，未出版。台中。
陳亮全、王价巨、詹桂綺（2002）。受災社區參與社區防災工作坊機制之建構與檢討－以南投縣水里鄉上安社區為例，第二屆災害防救研討會，台南：長榮管理學院。
陳禮仁（2014）。2013年世界天然災害大事紀。中華防災學刊，6(1)，98-110。
鄭熙彥（1985）。學校教育與社區發展。高雄：復文。
劉怡君、曾敏惠（2012)。本土防災社區的推動與深化。國家科技中心災害防救電子報，86。2012年09月11日，取自：http://www.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/E_book.aspx?WebSiteID=5853983c-7a45-4c1c-9093-f62cb7458282&id=6&subid=21。
趙家民、張宏仁(2007)。國民小學實施防災教育成效之研究－以南投縣內湖國小學童為例。環境教育學刊，6，71-100。
鄧子正、沈子勝（2002）。民間與社區防救災教育之建立與推動分析。內政部消防署委託學術研究計畫期末報告結案本(編號：091－301060000C1－ 009)。新北市：消防署。
藍毓仁（譯）（2008）。J. Ritchie & J. Lewis（主編）。質性研究方法（Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Studies and Researchers）。台北市：巨流。

英文文獻
Barbour, C., & Barbour, N. H. (1997). Families, schools, and communities: Building partnerships for educating children. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bishnu Pandey & Kenji Okazaki. (2005). Community Based Disaster Management: Empowering Communities to Cope with Disaster Risks. United Nations Centre for Regional Development, Japan. Retrieved March 7, 2014, from the web: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN020698.pdf
Chandra A, Acosta J, Stern S, Uscher-Pines L, Williams MV, Yeung D, Garnett J, and Meredith LS, Building Community Resilience to Disasters: A Way Forward to Enhance National Health Security, Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation, TR-915-DHHS, 2010. Retrieved March 7, 2014, from the web: http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9574/index1.html
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dilley, M., Chen, R. S., Deichmann, U., Lam, A. L., Arnold, M., Agwe, J., Buys, P., Kjekstad, O., Lyon, B., & Yetman, G. (2005). Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis. Disaster Risk Management Series. Retrieved from the web: http://www.preventionweb.net/files/1100_Hotspots.pdf
Eisenhartd, K.M.(1989).Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review,14(4),532-550.
Epstein, J.L., Sanders, M.G., Simon, B.S., Salinas, K.C., Jansorn, N. R., & Voorhis F. L. Van (2000). School, family, and community partnership：Your handbook for action(2 nd ). Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin.
FEMA. (1996). Project Impact. Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S.A. Retrieved from the web:https://www.fema.gov/news-release/1999/11/22/project-impact-building-disaster-resistant-community
Gallagher, D. R., Bagin, D., and Kindred, L.W. (1997). The school and community
Relations (6th.). Boston, MA：Allyn and Bacon.
General Office of National Committee for Disaster Reduction, P.R.China. (2010). The Report on Capacity Building on Disaster Reduction in Community. Project Report of the United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from the web: http://www.waiwenfanyi.com/fanyi-805.html
Kindred, L.W., Bagin, D., and Gallagher, D. R. (1990). The school and community
Relations (6th.). Boston, MA：Allyn and Bacon.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Nigg, J., Riad, J., Wachtendorf, T., Tweedy, A. & Reshaur, L. (1998). Disaster Resistant Communities Initiative Evaluation of the Pilot Phase: Assessment of Project Impact: Year 1 Executive Summary. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Nottinghamshire County Council. (2013). Coping with a school emergency, 3, January 2013. Retrieved December 13, 2013, from the web: https://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/learning/schools/information-for-schools/school-emergency-planning/
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed). London, Sage.
POSTNOTE. (2012). Resilience to Natural Hazards in Developing Nations. The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology.402.1-4. Retrieved from the web: file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/POST-PN-402.pdf
Prevention Web. (2014, Sep.29). Philippines: Disaster risk reduction in school continues its journey. Retrieved from the web: http://www.preventionweb.net/english/professional/news/v.php?id=39543
Tompson, S. (1995). The community as classroom. Educational Leadership, May, 17-20.
UN. (2009). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2009.UN.
UN. (2011). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2011.UN.
UN. (2013). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2013. UN.
UNESCOPRESS. (2006). Disaster Risk Reduction Begins at School. Retrieved December 13, 2013, from the web: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=33206&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
UNISDR. (2005).Hyogo Framework for Action. Retrieved March 7, 2014, from the web: http://www.unisdr.org/2005/wcdr/intergover/official-doc/L-docs/Hyogo-declaration-english.pdf。
UNISDR. (2007). Action with Common Purpose: proceedings of the first session of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva, 5-7 June 2007. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015. Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. Retrieved from the web: http://www.preventionweb.net/globalplatform/first-session / docs /session_docs / GP–Acting–with-common-purpose.pdf.
UNISDR. (2014), HYOGO FRAMEWORKCOUNTRIES & REGIONSTHEMES & ISSUESHAZARDSPROFESSIONAL RESOURCES. Retrieved from the web: http://www.preventionweb.net/english/professional/news/v.php?id=39543
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Practical Information On Crisis Planning: A Guide For Schools And Communities. Retrieved March 7, 2015. from the web: http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/safety/emergencyplan/index.html
日文文獻
社団法人日本火災学会（1996）。1995年兵庫縣南部地震における火災に關する調查報告書。(文檔編號:690)。兵庫縣：消防日本學會。
国立教育政策研究所 文教施設研究センター（2008）。学校施設の防災機能の向上のために：避難所となる学校施設の防災機能に関する調査研究報告書。避難所となる学校施設の防災機能に関する調査研究研究会。
文部科學省（2011）。災害安全に関する組織活動。2014年12月14日。取自: http://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2013/05/15/1334780_06.pdf