本論文主要在探討維吉尼亞．吳爾芙作品中的「倫理式美學」。吳爾芙作為一個對社會議題敏銳的現代主義者，一直以來，她作品的特色不只彰顯在創新的寫作手法上，更在於對他/牠/它者的道德關懷。在這樣的前提之下，透過關注吳爾芙筆下角色的感官和知覺經驗，並且將這些視為「物件」來看待；我們將可以更清楚明瞭在現代社會中，現代性的議題以及人物的感官知覺與社會環境的交互影響。另外，更重要的是，這些「物件」可以提供讀者倫理的視角，進而去重新思索和定義自我與他人、主體與客體、人類與非人之間的關係。
本論文第一章著重於處理現代主義脈絡中，真實與再現的議題。本章主張吳爾芙式的現代主義美學，是基於對現代性來臨的反思與反應。第二章則將真實與再現的議題擴展到倫理的層面，並以此將吳爾芙的倫理與當代理論連結而進行對話。本章建構了本論文的理論框架，認為吳爾芙藉由描寫人物的感官與知覺，表達她對邊緣化群體的倫理關注。接續的三章則為文本分析；著重在解讀人物感覺和感官的物件性。第三章探討了《戴維洛夫人》中的視覺及聽覺感官經驗，說明了吳爾芙如何利用此物件性來掙脫國族主義的桎梏。第四章則是比較《燈塔行》和《幕間》兩本小說。本章主張透過視覺及聽覺的描寫，吳爾芙利用這些物件性來抵抗單一文化及一元性的價值觀。最後的第五章則探討了《一隻叫活力的狗》中的嗅覺；並主張這些嗅覺的物件性能夠模糊化人類與非人的界線性。本論文透過關注吳爾芙作品中人類的感覺和感官的物件性，試圖將現代主義之中的美學和倫理立場連結起來；我並將其稱為「倫理式美學」。我希冀能在現代主義相關的研究中證明：吳爾芙並非如所被批評般的擁抱菁英主義。事實上吳爾芙一直以來都不遺餘力地在她的著作中，展現了對邊緣化和脆危群體的道德責任。

關鍵字: 倫理、美學、感覺、感官、物件、感知、真實、再現、吳爾芙

This dissertation seeks to investigate Virginia Woolf's "ethical aesthetics" embedded in her works. As a modernist sensitive to social issues, Woolf features not only her innovative writing skills but her ethical consideration towards others. At this point, by approaching sensations and senses demonstrated in Woolf's writings as things, we can better understand the issue of modernity and the interplay between characters' sensory perceptions and social environment. Significantly, these things offer us an ethical lens to reconsider and redefine the relations between the self and others, the subject and the object, and the human and the nonhuman.
Chapter 1 highlights the issues of reality and representation in Woolf's work in a modernist context. It also contends that Woolf's modernist aesthetics is the response to the attack on modernity. Chapter 2 broadens the scope of the problems of reality and representation to an ethical level, associating Woolf's ethics with contemporary theories. It builds the theoretical framework with Woolf's oeuvre, arguing that the display of characters' sensations and senses is Woolf's ethical manner to show her concerns for the marginalized. The following three chapters are textual analyses focusing on reading the thingness in characters' sensations and senses. Chapter 3 deals with the audiovisual senses in Mrs. Dalloway, showing how Woolf utilizes thingness to destabilize nationalism. Chapter 4 is a comparison and contrast between To the Lighthouse and Between the Acts. From the visual to the audio descriptions, Woolf uses these things to defend the unitary values encroaching on life. Chapter 5 grapples with the sense of smell in Flush, as the thing blurs the boundary between the human and the nonhuman. By paying attention to the characters' sensations and senses, I try to link aesthetics and ethics in modernist literature and then I identify this as "ethical aesthetics." I expect my contribution to modernist studies is: that without embracing elitism, Virginia Woolf shows her ethical responsibilities to the marginalized and the vulnerable in her writings.

Keywords: ethics, aesthetics, sensation, sense, thing, perception, reality, representation, Woolf

References

Abrams, M. H. “Modernism and Postmodernism.” A Glossary of Literary Terms. 3rd ed., Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.
Ahmed, Sara. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Duke UP, 2007.
Alaimo, Stacy. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Indiana UP, 2010.
Alt, Christina. Virginia Woolf and the Study of Nature. Cambridge UP, 2010.
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso, 1991.
Anderson, Linda R. Autobiography. 2nd ed., Routledge P, 2011.
Armstrong, Tim. Modernism: A Cultural History. Polity, 2010.
---. “Two Types of Shock in Modernity.” Critical Quarterly, vol. 42, no.1, 2000, pp. 60–73.
Asher, Kenneth. Literature, Ethics, and the Emotions. Cambridge UP, 2017.
Auden, W. H. “Virginia Woolf’s Consciousness of Reality.” The New Yorker, 26 Feb. 1954, www.newyorker.com/magazine/1954/03/06/a-consciousness-of-reality.
Audi, Robert, editor. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge UP, 1995.
Banfield, Ann. “Remembrance and Tense Past.” The Cambridge Companion to the Modernist Novel, edited by Morag Shiach, Cambridge UP, 2007, pp. 48-64.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. U of Texas P, 1981.
---. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. U of Minnesota P, 1997.
Barrows, Adam. The Cosmic Time of Empire: Modern Britain and World Literature. U of California, 2011.
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke UP, 2010.
Berman, Jessica Schiff. “Ethical Folds: Ethics, Aesthetics, Woolf.” MFS Modern Fiction Studies, vol. 50, no. 1, spring 2004, pp. 151–172.
Berman, Marshall. All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. Verso, 2010.
Bhabha, Homi K. “DissemiNation: Time, Narrative and the Margins of the Modern Nation.” Nation and Narration, edited by Homi K. Bhabha, Routledge P, 1990, pp. 291-322.
Blackman, Lisa. Immaterial Bodies: Affect, Embodiment, Mediation. Sage, 2013.
“Bloomberg - Are You a Robot?” www.bloomberg.com, www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-24/full-transcript-vladimir-putin-s-televised-address-to-russia-on-ukraine-feb-24.
Breton, David Le, and Carmen Ruschiensky. Sensing the World: An Anthropology of the Senses. Bloomsbury Academic, 2017.
Broughton, Trev. “Woolf at War.” The Times Literary Supplement, June 2011, p. 4.
Brown, Bill. Other Things. U of Chicago P, 2015.
---. “The Secret Life of Things (Virginia Woolf).” Other Things. U of Chicago P, 2016, pp. 49–78.
---. Things. U of Chicago P, 2004.
Bryant, Levi R. The Democracy of Objects. Open Humanities P, 2011.
---. The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Re.press, 2011.
Butler, Judith, et al. Vulnerability in Resistance. Duke UP, 2016.
Calarco, Matthew. Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida. Columbia UP, 2008.
Călinescu, Matei. Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, Avant-garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism. Duke UP, 1987.
Carr, Helen. “Empire and Race.” Sellers, Cambridge Companion to Virginia Woolf. Cambridge UP, 2012, pp. 197-213.
Catherine, Wiley, “Making History Unrepeatable in Virginia Woolf’s Between the Acts.” Clio, vol. 25, no.1, 1995, pp. 3–20.
Caughie, Pamela L. Virginia Woolf in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Routledge P, 2015.
Christensen, Susie. “‘What a Weathercock of Sensibility I Am!’: Sensory Self-Observation in the Diaries of Virginia Woolf and ‘A Human Experiment in Nerve Division’ by Henry Head and W. H. R. Rivers.” Textual Practice, vol. 29, no. 6, 2015, pp. 1117–1142.
Chun, Maureen. “Between Sensation and Sign: The Secret Language of The Waves.” Journal of Modern Literature, vol. 36, no. 1, 2012, pp. 53–70.
Classen, Constance, et al. A Cultural History of the Senses. Bloomsbury Academic, 2019.
Clewell, Tammy. Modernism and Nostalgia: Bodies, Locations, Aesthetics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Clough, Patricia Ticineto, and Jean O’Malley Halley, editors. The Affective Turn Theorizing the Social. Duke UP, 2007.
Cooper, D. E. “Materialism and Perception.” The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 81, 1970, p. 334–346.
Davidson, Michael. Invalid Modernism: Disability and the Missing Body of the Aesthetic. Oxford UP, 2019.
Dinsman, Melissa. Modernism at the Microphone: Radio, Propaganda, and Literary Aesthetics During World War II. Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.
Eliot, George. “The Natural History of German Life.” The Westminster Review, 19 July 1856,
www.bl.uk/collection-items/the-natural-history-of-german-life-essay-by-george-eliot-from-the-westminster-review.
Ellis, Steve. Virginia Woolf and the Victorians. Cambridge UP, 2012.
Faulkner, Peter. Modernism. Methuen, 1985.
Fichant, Michel. “Perception/Apperception.” Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon, edited by Barbara Cassin, et al., Princeton UP, 2014, pp. 764–768.
Flora, Fluisa. “‘Manacled to a rock he was’: Exhausted Patriarchy in Between the Acts.” Studies in Homage to Margarida Losa. Faculty of Arts of the University of Porto, 2006, pp. 169–182.
Foucault, Michel. The Birth of the Clinic. Routledge P, 2003.
---. Power/Knowledge. Longman, 1980.
Freud, Sigmund. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Vol.18, The Hogarth P, 1966.
Frow, John. “A Pebble, a Camera, a Man Who Turns into a Telegraph Pole.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 28, no. 1, 2001, pp. 270–285.
Fry, Roger. “An Essay in Aesthetics.” Vision and Design. Dover Publications, 1998, pp. 11–25.
---. Vision and Design. Blurb, 2018.
Fussell, Paul, and Lyn Macdonald. The Great War and Modern Memory. Folio Society, 2014.
Gardiner, Michael E. “Post-romantic irony in Bakhtin and Lefebvre.” History and Human Sciences, vol. 25, no. 3, 2012, pp. 51–69.
Gill, Gillian. Virginia Woolf: And the Women Who Shaped Her World. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2019.
Gillespie, Michael Allen. The Theological Origins of Modernity. ReadHowYouWant.com Ltd, 2010.
Goldman, Jane. Modernism, 1910-1945: Image to Apocalypse. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
Goldman, Jane. “Virginia Woolf and the Aesthetics of Modernism.” The History of British Women’s Writing, edited by Maroula Joannou, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, pp. 57-77.
Golumbia, David. “‘Correlationism’: The Dogma That Never Was.” Boundary 2, vol. 43, no. 2, May 2016, pp. 1–25.
Green, André. Time in Psychoanalysis: Some Contradictory Aspects. Free Association, 2002.
Greenblatt, Stephen, and M. H. Abrams. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Vol. 2. W.W. Norton, 2006.
Grosz, Elizabeth A. The Incorporeal: Ontology, Ethics, and the Limits of Materialism. Columbia UP, 2018.
Habermas, Jürgen. “Modernity—An Incomplete Project.” Postmodernism: A Reader, edited by Docherty, Thomas, Columbia UP, 1993. pp. 98–109.
Harman, Graham. Art and Objects. Polity, 2020.
---. “Graham Harman: Art without Relations.” Artreview.com, 4 Nov. 2014, artreview.com/september-2014-graham-harman-relations/.
---. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. Pelican Books, 2018.
---. Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures. O Books, 2010.
Harmon, William, and Clarence Hugh Holman. “Biography.” A Handbook to Literature: Based on Earlier Editions by William Flint Thrall, Addison Hibbard, and C. Hugh Holman. 9th ed., Prentice Hall, 2003, pp. 60-61.
Herman, David. “Modernist Life Writing and Nonhuman Lives: Ecologies of Experience in Virginia Woolf’s Flush.” MFS Modern Fiction Studies, vol. 59, no. 3, 2013, pp. 547–68.
Hertel, Ralf. Making Sense: Sense Perception in the British Novel of the 1980s and 1990s. Rodopi, 2005.
Hite, Molly. “Tonal Cues and Uncertain Values: Affect and Ethics in Mrs. Dalloway.” Narrative, vol. 18, no. 3, 2010, pp. 249–275.
Holborow, Les, and David Mellor. “Materialism and Phenomenal Qualities.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, vol. 47, no. 1, 1973, pp. 87–120.
Hooker, C. A. “Empiricism, Perception and Conceptual Change.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 3, no. 1, 1973, pp. 59–75.
Howes, David. A Cultural History of the Senses in the Modern Age, 1920-2000. Bloomsbury, 2014.
Humm, Maggie. Modernist Women and Visual Cultures: Virginia Woolf, Vanessa Bell, Photography, and Cinema. Rutgers UP, 2003.
Hutchens, Benjamin C. The Nancy Dictionary. Edinburgh UP, 2014.
Irigaray, Luce, and Michael Marder. Through Vegetal Being: Two Philosophical Perspectives. Columbia UP, 2016.
Jardine, Alice. “Interview with Simone de Beauvoir.” Translated by Ellen Evans. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 5. no 2, winter 1979, pp. 224–36.
Jarvis, Claire. “Beholding Virginia Woolf through the Women in Her Life.” The New York Times, 20 Dec. 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/12/20/books/review/virginia-woolf-and-the-women-who-shaped-her-world-gillian-gill.html.
Jay, Martin. “In the Realm of the Senses: An Introduction.” The American Historical Review, vol. 116, no. 2, 2011, pp. 307–15.
Jessica Schiff Berman. Modernist Fiction, Cosmopolitanism, and the Politics of Community. Cambridge UP, 2006.
Joannou, Maroula. The History of British Women’s Writing. Vol. 8, 1920-1945. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
Joyce, James. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Edited by Jeri Johnson, Oxford UP, 2000.
Kendall-Morwick, Karalyn. “Mongrel Fiction: Canine Bildung and the Feminist Critique of Anthropocentrism in Woolf’s Flush.” MFS Modern Fiction Studies, vol. 60, no. 3, 2014, pp. 506–26.
Kern, Stephen. The Culture of Time and Space: 1880-1918: With a New Preface. Harvard UP, 2003.
Khan, Gulshan. “Agency, Nature and Emergent Properties: An Interview with Jane Bennett.” Contemporary Political Theory, vol. 8, no. 1, Feb. 2009, pp. 90–105.
Krajickova, Veronika. “Virginia Woolf’s ‘Ontoethics’ in Her Late Oeuvre from the Perspective of Alfred North Whitehead’s Philosophy of Organism.” Process Studies, vol. 50, no. 2, 2021, pp. 222–41.
Kronick, Joseph G. “Philosophy as Autobiography: The Confessions of Jacques Derrida.” MLN, vol. 115, no. 5, 2000, pp. 997–1018.
Kuo, Chia-chen. “A Cinematic Reading of Virginia Woolf’s ‘Kew Garden.’” Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, vol. 35, no. 1, 2009, pp. 181–201.
Liang, R.D, et al. Interpersonal Perception: A Theory and Method of Research. Tavistock Publications, 1966.
Latham, Sean. Am I a Snob: Modernism and the Novel. Cornell UP, 2003.
Laurence, Patricia Ondek. The Reading of Silence: Virginia Woolf in the English Tradition. Stanford UP, 2001.
Lee, Hermione. The Novels of Virginia Woolf. Routledge P, 2010.
Lee, Sam. “The Comedy of Nature: Darwinian Feminism in Virginia Woolf’s Between the Acts.” Modernism/modernity, vol. 17, no. 3, 2010, pp. 639–67.
Lewis, Pericles. The Cambridge Introduction to Modernism. Cambridge UP, 2007.
Leys, Ruth. “The Turn to Affect: A Critique.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 37, no. 3, 2001, pp. 434–72.
Livesey, Ruth. “Socialism in Bloomsbury: Virginia Woolf and the Political Aesthetics of the 1880s.” The Yearbook of English Studies, vol. 37, no. 1, 2007, pp. 126–44.
Lostoski, Leanna. “‘Imaginations of the Strangest Kind’: The Vital Materialism of Virginia Woolf.” Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, vol. 49, no. 1, 2016, pp. 53–74.
Majumdar, Robin, and Allen McLaurin. Introduction. Virginia Woolf: The Critical Heritage. Routledge P, 1997.
Malafouris, Lambros. How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. The MIT P, 2016.
Mansell, James G. The Age of Noise in Britain: Hearing Modernity. U of Illinois P, 2017.
Marcus, Laura. “Woolf’s Feminism and Feminism’s Woolf.” Sellers, Cambridge Companion to Virginia Woolf. Cambridge UP, 2012, pp. 142-79.
Marshik. Celia. The Cambridge Companion to Modernist Culture. Cambridge UP, 2014.
Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. The German Ideology. Prometheus Books, 1998.
Maude, Ulrika. “Science, Technology, and the Body.” The Cambridge Companion to Modernist Culture, edited by Celia Marshik, Cambridge UP, 2014, pp. 33-49.
Maund, J. Barry. “Awareness of Sensory Experience.” Mind, vol. 85, no. 339, July 1976, pp. 412–16.
McIntyre, Gabrielle. Modernism, Memory and Desire: T.S. Eliot and Virginia Woolf. Cambridge UP, 2010.
McVicker, Jeanette. “Postcolonial Approaches.” Palgrave Advances in Virginia Woolf Studies, 2007, pp. 209–26.
Meillassoux, Quentin, and Ray Brassier. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Bloomsbury Academic, 2017.
Moore, Grace. “Virginia Woolf and the Remaking of Victorian Britain.” Virginia Woolf Bulletin, no. 13, May, 2003, pp.8–17.
Morton, Brian. “Virginia Woolf? Snob! Richard Wright? Sexist! Dostoyevsky? Anti-Semite!” The New York Times, 8 Jan. 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/01/08/books/review/edith-wharton-house-of-mirth-anti-semitism.html.
Mulvey, Laura. Visual and Other Pleasures. Palgrave Macmillan, 1989.
Nicolson, Nigel, and Joanne Trautmann. “Letter from Virginia Woolf to Janet Case, 21 May 1922.” The Letters of Virginia Woolf, Vol. II: 1912-1922: The Question of Things Happening. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1976, pp. 529.
Olk, Claudia. “Vision, Intermediality, and Spectatorship in Mrs. Dalloway and The Hours.” Amerikastudien / American Studies, vol. 49, no. 2, 2004, pp. 191-217
Papoulis, Irene. “Woolf’s Truths as Sleight of Hand.” CEA Critic, vol. 54, no. 3, 1992, pp. 18–25.
Parsons, Deborah L. Theorists of the Modernist Novel: James Joyce, Dorothy Richardson, and Virginia Woolf. Routledge P, 2008.
“Perception, N. (3).” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, 2022, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perception.
Piggford, George. “Camp Sites: Forster and the Biographies of Queer Bloomsbury.” Queer Bloomsbury, edited by Brenda S. Helt, Madelyn Detloff, Edinburgh UP, 2016, pp. 64–88.
Pridmore-Brown, Michele. “1939–40: Of Virginia Woolf, Gramophones, and Fascism.” PMLA, vol. 113, no. 3, May 1998, pp. 408–21.
Pulsifer, Rebecah. “‘Contemplating the Idiot’ in Virginia Woolf’s Between the Acts.” Journal of Modern Literature, vol. 42, no. 2, winter 2019, pp. 94–112.
Rajchman, John. “Foucault’s Art of Seeing.” October, vol. 44, spring 1988, p. 88–117.
Randall, Bryony. Modernism, Daily Time and Everyday Life. Cambridge UP, 2011.
Richardson, Michael. Surrealism and Cinema. Berg, 2006.
Ross, Lee. “Naive Realism: Implications for Social Conflict and Misunderstanding.” Values and Knowledge, edited by Edward S Reed et al., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.103–35.
Rudrum, David, et al. New Directions in Philosophy and Literature. Edinburgh UP, 2019.
Ryan, Derek, and Stephen Ross. The Handbook to the Bloomsbury Group. Bloomsbury Academic, 2018.
Ryan, Derek. “‘The Reality of Becoming’: Deleuze, Woolf and the Territory of Cows.” Deleuze Studies, vol. 7, no. 4, Nov. 2013, pp. 537–61.
---. Virginia Woolf and the Materiality of Theory: Sex, Animal, Life. Edinburgh UP, 2015.
Sarker, Sonita. “Locating a Native Englishness in Virginia Woolf’s ‘the London Scene.’” NWSA Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, summer 2001, pp. 1–30.
Schleifer, Ronald. Modernism and Time: The Logic of Abundance in Literature, Science, and Culture, 1880-1930. Cambridge UP, 2009.
Schneider, Karen. “Of Two Minds: Woolf, the War and Between the Acts.’” Journal of Modern Literature, vol. 16, no. 1, 1989, pp. 93–112.
Schrimper, Michael R. “The Eye, the Mind & the Spirit: Why ‘the Look of Things’ Held a ‘Great Power’ over Virginia Woolf.” Journal of Modern Literature, vol. 42, no. 1, fall 2018, p. 32–48.
Sellers, Susan. The Cambridge Companion to Virginia Woolf. Cambridge UP, 2012.
“Sensation, N. (1).” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, 2022, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sensation.
“Sense, N. (2).” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, 2022, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sense.
Shiach, Morag. “Reading the Modernist Novel.” An Introduction. The Cambridge Companion to the Modernist Novel. Cambridge UP, 2007.
Silver, Brenda R. “Virginia Woolf and the Concept of Community: The Elizabethan Playhouse.” Women’s Studies, vol. 4, 1977, pp. 291-298.
Sim, Lorraine. Virginia Woolf: The Patterns of Ordinary Experience. Ashgate, 2010.
Simmel, Georg. Metropolis and Mental Life, translated by Kurt Wolff, U of Chicago P, 1961.
Simone, Emma. Virginia Woolf and Being-in-the-world: A Heideggerian Study. Edinburgh UP, 2018.
Singer, Ben. “Introduction: Modernism, Modernity, and the Senses.” Introduction. Monatshefte, vol. 98, no. 2, June 2006, pp. 175–79.
Snaith, Anna. Palgrave Advances in Virginia Woolf Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Stasi, Paul. Modernism, Imperialism, and the Historical Sense. Cambridge UP, 2012.
Sultzbach, Kelly. Ecocriticism in the Modernist Imagination: Forster, Woolf, and Auden. Cambridge UP, 2016.
Swanson, Diana L. “Woolf’s Copernican Shift: Nonhuman Nature in Virginia Woolf’s Short Fiction.” Woolf Studies Annual, vol. 18, 2012, pp. 53–74.
Thompson, F. M. L. “Social Control in Victorian Britain.” The Economic History Review, vol. 34, no. 2, May 1981, pp. 189–208.
Tidwell, Joanne Campbell. Politics and Aesthetics in the Diary of Virginia Woolf. Routledge P, 2012.
Tilghman, B. R. Wittgenstein, Ethics and Aesthetics: The View from Eternity. Macmillan, 1993.
Toril Moi. Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. Routledge P, 1995.
Trotter, David. Cinema and Modernism. Blackwell Pub, 2007.
Tung, Charles M. “Modernism, Time Machines, and the Defamiliarization of Time.” Configurations, vol. 23, no.1, winter 2015, pp. 93–121.
Vincent, Alice. “Why Virginia Woolf Remains One of Literature’s Most Alluring Writers.” The Telegraph, 25 Jan. 2018, www.telegraph.co.uk/books/authors/virginia-woolf-remains-one-literatures-alluring-writers/.
Walkowitz, Rebecca. Cosmopolitan Style: Modernism beyond the Nation. UP of California, 2007.
West-Pavlov, Russell. Temporalities. Routledge P, 2013.
Wetherell, Margaret. Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. Sage, 2014.
Whitworth, Michael H. Modernism. Blackwell Pub, 2007.
Whitworth, Michael H. “Virginia Woolf, Modernism, and Modernity.” Sellers, Cambridge Companion to Virginia Woolf. Cambridge UP, 2012, pp. 107-23.
Williams, Raymond. Marxism and Literature. Oxford UP, 1989.
Woolf, Virginia. Collected Essays, Vo. 2. The Hogarth P, 1972.
---. “The Art of Biography.” Bradshaw, Selected Essays. Oxford UP, 2009, pp. 116-23.
---. “Character in Fiction.” Bradshaw, Selected Essays. Oxford UP, 2009, pp. 37-74.
---. “The Cinema.” Bradshaw, Selected Essays. Oxford UP, 2009, pp. 172-76.
---. The Complete Shorter Fiction of Virginia Woolf. Edited by Susan Dick. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1989.
---. The Diary of Virginia Woolf. Vol. 2, 1920-1924. Harcourt, 1978
---. The Diary of Virginia Woolf. Vol.5, 1936-1941. Harcourt Brace, 1985.
---. Flush. Penguin Books, 2016.
---. “Modern Fiction.” Bradshaw, Selected Essays. Oxford UP, 2009, pp. 6-22.
---. Moments of Being: Unpublished Autobiographical Writings. Edited by Jeanne Schulkind. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1976.
---. “Mr Bennett and Mrs Brown.” Bradshaw, Selected Essays. Oxford UP, 2009, pp. 32-36.　
---. Mrs. Dalloway. Vintage, 2008.
---. Night and Day. Edited by Suzanne Raitt. Oxford UP, 2009.
---. Orlando. Penguin Classics, 2020.
---. A Room of One’s Own. CNIB, 1997.
---. Selected Essays. Edited by David Bradshaw. Oxford UP, 2009.
---. “Street Haunting: A London Adventure.” Bradshaw, Selected Essays. Oxford UP, 2009, pp. 177-187.
---. Three Guineas. Vintage, 2016.
---. To the Lighthouse. Edited by David Bradshaw. Oxford UP, 2008.
---. The Years; Between the Acts. Edited by Linden Peach. Wordsworth Editions Limited, 2012.
Wurtz, James F. “‘I Have Had My Vision’: Empire and the Aesthetic in Woolf’s To the Lighthouse.” Woolf Studies Annual, vol. 16, 2010, pp. 95–110,
Zwerdling, Alex. “Mrs. Dalloway and the Social System.” PMLA, vol. 92, no. 1, Jan. 1977, pp. 69-82.
---. Virginia Woolf and the Real World. U of California P, 1992.
Zwintscher, Aaron. Noise Thinks the Anthropocene: An Experiment in Noise Poetics. Punctum Books, 2019.