本研究的目的在探討決策者如何權變性地運用決策策略來解決決策問題。研究一以「心力／精確性」交換模式為理論架構，採用條件語句系統建構各種決策策略的心理運作模型，並以初級訊息處理和相對精確性的觀點，做為心力與精確性的測量指標。使用電腦模擬的方法加以比較各策略在不同決策作業情境下，心力與精確性交換的情形。模擬結果指出：在耗用較少的心力和獲取較高的精確性的權衡考量下，沒有單一策略在所有的情境都表現的很好，亦即沒有任何一種策略適用於所有的決策作業情境。值得注意的是，在時間壓力高且決策作業變大的情境下，使用一些捷思策略來解決決策問題，所得的精確性高於使用規範性的策略所得到的精確性。因此，在心力與精確性交換的情形下，決策者會依據作業情境的變化，進而權變地運用決策策略來解決決策問題。
研究二以訊息處理論的觀點為基礎，採用歷程追蹤的方法監控訊息處理行為，並以大學生為對象進行兩個實驗。實驗目的在於設計與模擬研究相對應的決策作業情境，進一步蒐集實際的訊息處理行為資料加以檢驗模擬結果所衍生的預測，以及考驗決策作業特性中的作業變項與脈絡變項對決策行為的交互作用效果。實驗一主要在探討時間壓力、選項數量、和屬性數量對決策行為的交互作用效果。結果指出：時間壓力、選項數量和屬性數量三因子在所有的訊息處理行為指標上都沒有交互作用的效果；只有時間壓力和選項數量，或時間壓力和屬性數量在訊息使用量、選擇時間、訊息處理時間、和搜索變異性上有交互作用效果。實驗二主要在探討時間壓力和加權值分散情形對決策行為的交互作用效果。結果指出：時間壓力和加權分散情形二因子在訊息處理行為指標上都沒有交互作用的效果，只有在部分的行為指標上有主要效果存在。
最後，本研究除了對上述的研究結果加以討論之外，也對後續的研究方向及可能的應用提出相關的建議。

The purpose of this study was to explore how the individual contingently uses decision strategies to solve the decision problems. In Study One, the effort/accuracy tradeoff model was used as the framework and the production system was used to model the mental processes of the choice strategies. The concepts of elementary information processing (EIP) and relative accuracy (RA) were also used to measure the effort and accuracy in the decision process. A computer simulation was undertaken to compare different strategies of effort and accuracy in various decision environments. The results suggest that no single strategy did well across all task and context conditions under the consideration of saving effort and gaining high accuracy. The finding indicates that under the higher time pressure and larger task size condition, several heuristic strategies were more accurate than the truncated normative strategy. Therefore, under the consideration of effort and accuracy tradeoff, decision-makers use a variety of strategies contingent upon a number of task and context variables.
In Study Two, the information processing perspective and a process-tracing technique were used to monitor the information acquisition behaviors. One hundred and twenty-four undergraduates participated in the two experiments. The purposes of these two experiments were to test how closely the efficient processing patterns for a given decision problem identified by the simulation correspond to the actual processing behavior exhibited by participants, and to test the task and context variables interaction effects on decision behaviors. ExperimentⅠwas designed to explore the interaction effects among time pressure, numbers of alternative and numbers of attribute on decision behaviors. The results suggest that there was no three-way interaction on information processing behaviors. There were only two-way interactions between time pressure and numbers of alternative, or between time pressure and numbers of attribute on some dependent variables-the amount of information, choice time, information-processing time and searching variation. ExperimentⅡwas undertaken to explore the interaction effects of time pressure and dispersions of weight on decision behaviors. The results suggest that there were no interaction effects on information processing behaviors. In general, actual behavior partly corresponded to the general patterns of efficient processing identified by the simulation.
Finally, these findings and implications were discussed in detail. The directions for future studies were suggested and possible applications were also recommended.

王震武（民75）：選擇歷程中屬性訊息的選取與組合歷程。國立台灣大學心理學研究所博士論文。
吳瑞屯（民71）：多項屬性刺激選擇行為的研究。國立台灣大學心理學研究所博士論文。
林正昌（民82）：不同生涯決策型態大學生的決策行為研究－屬性數量變化與訊息呈現方式之效果分析。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
林清山、金樹人、林正昌（民86）：時間壓力、屬性數量及選項數量變化情境況對決策行為之影響研究。教育心理學報，29期，頁1-24。
竺乾威、胡君芳譯（民80）：決策過程。台北：五南。
Abelson, R. P. & Levi, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, J. R. (1983a). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawren Erlbaum Associates.
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawren Erlbaum Associates.
Aschenbrenner, K. M. (1981). Efficient sets, decision heuristics, and single-peaked preferences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 23, 227-256.
Beach, L. R. (1990). Image theory: Decision making in personal and organizational contexts. Chichester: Wiley.
Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T.R.(1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3, 439-449.
Ben Zur, H., & Breznitz, S. J. (1981). The effects of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychologica, 49, 89-104.
Bettman, J. R. (1979). An information processing theory of consumer choice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Bettman, J. R., Johnson, E. J.,& Payne, J. W. (1990). A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 111-139.
Bettman, J. R., Johnson, E. J.,& Payne, J. W. (1991).Consumer decision making. In T. S. Robertson and H. H. Kassarjan (Eds.) Handbook of consumer behavior. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 234-248.
Biggs, S. F., Bedard, J.C., Gaber, B.G., & Linsmeier, T. J. (1985). The effects of task size and similarity on the decision behavior of bank loan officer. Management Science, 31, 970-987.
Biggs, S. F., Rosman, A. J., & Sergenian, G. K. (1993). Methodological issues in judgment and decision-making research: Concurrent verbal protocol validity and simultaneous traces of process. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 187-206.
Billings, R. S., & Marcus, S. A. (1983). Measures of compensatory and noncompensatory models of decision behavior: Process tracing versus policy capturing. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 331-352.
Carroll, J. S., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Decision research: A field guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1999). Computational modeling of high-level cognition versus hypothesis testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.) The nature of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chase, W. G. (1978). Elementary information processes. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes. Vol. 5, Human information processing (pp. 19-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. (1978).Problem-solving strategies: A selection mechanism, some implications, and some data. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 307-323.
Coombs, C. H. (1958). On the use of inconsistency of preference in psychological measurement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 1-7.
Coupey, E. (1994). Restructuring: Constructive processing of information displays in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 83-99.
Curry, D. J., & Faulds, D. J. (1986). Indexing product quality: Issues, theory, and results. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 134-145.
Dahlstrand, U.,& Montgomery, H.(1984). Information search and evaluative processes in decision making: A computer based process tracing study. ACTA Psychologica, 56, 113-123.
Dawes, R. M. (1996). Behavioral decision making, judgment, and inference. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G Lindzey (Eds.) The handbook of social psychology. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380-417.
Einhorn, H. J. (1970). The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 211-230.
Einhorn, H. J. (1980). Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making. In T. S. Wallsten (Ed.) Cognitive process in choice and decision behavior (pp. 1-20). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Einhorn, H. J.,& Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53-88.
Ericson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (revised ed.). London: MIT press.
Ford, J. K., Schmitt, N., Schechtman, S. L., Hults, B. M., & Doherty, M. L. (1989). Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision processes, 43, 75-117.
Fischhoff, B. (1982). Debiasing. In D. Kahenman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and bias (pp. 422-444). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilliland, S. W., Schmitt, N. (1993). Information redundancy and decision behavior: A process tracing investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 157-180.
Gilliland, S. W., Schmitt, N., & Wood, L. (1993). Cost-benefit determinants of decision process and accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making, 56, 308-330 .
Goldstein, W. M., & Hogarth, R. M. (1997). Judgment and decision making: some historical context. In W. M. Goldstein & R. M. Hogarth (Eds.), Research on judgment and decision making: Currents, connections, and controversies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Grether, D. M., & Wilde, L. L. (1983). Consumer choice and information: New experimental evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 1, 115-144.
Grether, D. M., Schwartz, A., Wilde, L. L. (1986). The irrelevance of information overload: An analysis of search and disclosure. Southern California Law Review, 59, 277-303.
Harte, J. M., Westenberg, R. M. & van Someren, M. (1994). Process models in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 87, 95-120.
Herstein, J. A. (1981). Keeping the voters limits in mind: A cognitive process analysis of decision making in voting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 843-861.
Hogarth, R. M. (1987). Judgment and choice (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R.E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Huber, O. (1980). The influence of some task variables on cognitive operations in an information-processing decision model. ACTA Psychologica, 45, 187-196.
Huber, O. (1989). Information-processing operators in decision making. In H. Montgomery & O. Svenson (Eds.) Process and structure in human decision making (pp. 3-21). Chichester: Wiley.
Huber, O. (1994). Simualtion as a tool to improve process model. Acta Psychologica, 87, 121-134.
Huber, O., Mumpower, J., van der Pligt, J., Koele, P. (1993). Current themes in psychological decision making. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hunt, E. (1989). Cognitive Science: Definition, Status, and questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 603-629.
Janis, I. L. & Mann L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
Johnson, E. J. (1979). Deciding how to decide: The effort of making a decision. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.
Johnson, E. J., Meyer, R. J. (1984). Compensatory choice models of noncompensatory processes: The effect of varying context. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 528-541.
Johnson, E. J., Meyer, R. J., & Ghose, S. (1989). When choice models fail: Compensatory representaions in negatively correlated environments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 255-270.
Johnson, E.J., & Payne, J. W. (1985). Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Science, 31, 394-414.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1984). Using eye fixations to study reading comprehension. In D. K. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New method in reading comprehension research (pp. 151-182). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica, 47,263-291.
Keller, K. L., & Staelin, R. (1987). Effects of quality and quantity of information on decision effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 200-213.
Klayman, J. (1983). Analysis of predecisional information search patterns. In P. C. Humphreys, O. Svenson, & a Vari (Eds.) Analyzing and aiding decision processes (pp. 401-414). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Klayman, J. (1985). Children's decision strategies and their adaptation to task characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 179-201.
Levin I. P., & Jasper, J. D. (1995). Phased narrowing: A New process tracing method for decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisionn Processes, 64(1), 1-8.
Levin, I. P., Johnson,R. D., Russo, C. P.,& Deldin , P. J. (1985). Framing Effects in judgment tasks with varying amounts of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 362-377.
Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahnman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp.306-334). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindsay, R. K. (1991). Symbolic-processing theories and the SOAR architecture. Psychological Science, 2, 294-302.
Lipman, B. L. (1991). How to decide how to decide how to…: Modeling limited rationality. Econometrica, 59, 1105-1125.
Malhotra, N. K. (1982). Information load and consumer decison making. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 419-430.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Fanccisco: Freeman.
Maule, A. J. (1994). A componential investigation of the relation between structual modeling and cognitive accounts of human judgment. Acta Psychologica, 87, 199-216.
May, K. O. (1954). Intransitivity, utility and the aggregation of preference patterns. Econometrica, 22, 1-13.
McAllister, D. W., Mitchell, T. R., & Beach, L. R. (1979). The contingency model for the selection of decision strategies: An empirical test of the effects of significance, accountability, and reversibility. Oganizational Behavior and Human Decision processes, 24(2), 228-244.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1988). Explorations in parallel distributed processing: A handbook of models, programs, and exercises. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Meyer, R. J., & Johnson, E. J. (1989). Information overload and the nonrobustness of linear models: A comment on Keller and Staelin. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 498-503.
Miller,G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits of our capacity for the processing of information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
Montgomery, H.(1983). Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: Towards a process model of decision making. In P.C. Humphreys, O. Svenson, & A. Vari (Eds.), Analyzing and Aiding decision processes. New York: North-Holland.
Montgomery, H., & Svenson, O. (1989). A thinking aloud study of dominance structuring in decision processes. In H. Montgomery & O. Svenson (Eds.) Process and structure in human decision making. Chichester: Wiley
Neisser, U. (1983). Components of intelligence or steps in routine procedures, Cognition, 15, 189-197.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1976). Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19, 113-126.
Nissbet, R. E., Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
Onken, J., Hastie, R., & Revelle, W. (1985). Individual differences in the use of simplification strategies in complex decision-making task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 14-27.
Ordonez, L. D., & Benson, L., III (1997). Decision under time pressure: How time constrain affects risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision processes, 71(2), 121-140.
Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366-387.
Payne, J. W. (1980). Information processing theory: Some concepts and method applied to decision research. In T. S. Wallsten(Eds.), Cognitive Process in Choice and Decision Behavior (pp. 95-115).Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
Payne, J. W. (1982). Contingent decision behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 382-402.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534-552.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E.J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87-131.
Payne, J. W., Braustein, M. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1978). Exploring predecisional behavior: An alternative approach to decision research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 17-44.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E.J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge, England: Cambridge university press.
Payne, J. W., Johnson, E. J., Bettman, J. R., & Coupey, E. (1990). Understanding contingent choice: A computer simulation approach. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, 20, 296-309.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Luce, M. F. (1996). When time is money: Decision behavior under opportunity-cost time pressure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(2), 131-152.
Pitz, G. F. (1977). Decision making and cognition. In H. Jungerman & G. de Zeeuw (Eds.), Decision making and change in human affairs. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
Pitz, G.,& Sachs, N. (1984). Judgment and decision: Theory and application. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 139-163.
Posner, M. I., & McLeod, P. (1982). Information processing models-in search of elementary operations, Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 477-514.
Rothstein, H. G. (1986). The effects of time pressure on judgment in multiple cue probability learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 83-92.
Russo, J. E. (1978). Eye fixations can save the world: Critical evaluation and comparison between eye fixations and other information processing methodologies. In H. K. Hunt (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (V0l. 5 , pp. 561-570). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
Russo, J. E., & Dosher, B. A. (1983). Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 676-696.
Russo, J. E., Johnson, E. J., Stephens, D. M. (1989). The validity of verbal protocols. Memory and Cognition, 17, 759-769.
Schneider, S. L., & Lopes, L. L. (1986). Reflection in preferences under risk: Who and when may suggest why. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 535-548.
Shanteau, J. (1974). Component processes in risky decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 680-691.
Shepard, R. N. (1964). On subjectively optimum selection among multiattribute alternatives. In M. W. Shelly II & G. L. Bryan (Eds.) Human judgments and optimality. New York: Wiley.
Shields, M. D. (1983). Effects of information supply and demand on judgment accuracy: Evidence from corporate managers. Accounting Review, 58, 284-303.
Shugan, S. M. (1980). The cost of thinking. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 99-111.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.
Simon, H. A. (1981). The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of hunman behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1-19.
Smith, J. F., Mitchell, T. R., & Beach, L. R. (1982). A cost-benefit mechanism for problem-solving strategies: Some extensions and empirical tests. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 29(3), 370-396.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B.,& Lichenstein, S. (1977). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 1-39.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B.,& Lichenstein, S. (1982). Response mode, framing, theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 1-39.
Slovic, P., & Lichenstein, S. (1971). Comparison Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. Organizational behavior and Human Performance, 6, 649-744.
Smith, J. F., Mitchell, T. R., & Beach, L. R. (1982). A cost-benefit mechanism for selecting problem solving strategies: Some extensions and empirical tests. Organizational behavior and Human Performance, 29, 370-396.
Stokmans, M. (1992). Analyzing information search patterns to test the use of a two-phased decision strategy. Acta Psychologica, 80, 213-227.
Stone, D. N. & Schkade, D. A. (1991). Numberic and linguistic information representation in multiattribute choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 42-59.
Sundstroem, G. A. (1987). Information search and decision making: The effects of information displays. Acta Psychologica, 65, 165-179.
Svenson. O. (1973). Analysis of strategies in subjective probability inferences as evidenced in continuous verbal reports and numerical responses (No. 396). Reports from the Psychological Laboratories, University of Stockholm.
Svenson. O. (1974). A note on think aloud protocols obtained during the choice of a home (No. 421). Reports from the Psychological Laboratories, University of Stockholm.
Svenson, O. (1979). Process descriptions of decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 86-112.
Svenson, O. (1996). Decision making and the search for fundamental psychological regularities: What can be learned from a process perspective? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 252-267.
Svenson, O., & Edland, A. (1987). Changes of preferences under time pressure: Choices and judgments. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 28, 322-330.
Svenson, O., & Edland, A., & Slovic, P. (1990). Choices between incompletely alternatives under time stress. Acta Psychologica, 75, 153-169.
Svenson, O., & Maule, A. J. (Eds.). (1993). Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. NY: Plenum Press.
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
Thorngate, W. (1980). Efficient decision heuristics. Behavioral Science, 25, 219-225.
Tversky, A. (1967). Additivity, utility and subjective probability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4, 175-202.
Tversky, A. (1972) Choice by elimination. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 9, 341-367.
Tversky, A. (1972) Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological review, 79, 281-299.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, S251-S278.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1990). Cumulative prospect theory: An analysis of decision under uncertainty. Unpublished working paper, Stanford University.
van Raiij, W. F. (1977). Consumer information processing for different information structures and formats. In W. D. Perrault (Ed.) Advances in Consumer Research, (pp. 176-184). Chicago: Assoc. for Consumer Research.
Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Waller, W. S., & Mitchell, T. R. (1984). The effects of context on the selection of decision strategies for the cost variance investigation problem. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 397-413.
Wallsten, T. S. (1990). The costs and benefits of vague information. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 28-43). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wallsten, T. S. (1993). Time pressure and payoff effects on multidimensional probabilistic inference. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. NY: Plenum Press.
Westenberg, M. R. M., & Koele, P. (1992). Response mode, decison processes and decision outcomes. Acta psychologica, 80, 169-184.
Westenberg, M. R. M., & Koele, P. (1994). Multi-attribute evaluation processes: Methodological and conceptual issues. Acta psychologica, 87, 65-84.
Whicker, M. L., & Sigelman, L. (1991). Computer simulation application: An introduction. Newbury Park , CA: Sage.
Wright, P. L. (1974). The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 555-561.
Yates, F. (1990). Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Zakay, D. (1985). Post-decisional confidence and conflict experienced in a choice process. Acta Psychologica, 58, 75-80.
Zakay, D., & Wooler, S. (1984). Time pressure, training and decision effectiveness. Ergonomics, 27, 273-284.