簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳玉娟
Yu-Juan Chen
論文名稱: 團隊管理及其在國民中小學運用之研究
The study of team-management and its usage in elementary and junior high schools
指導教授: 謝文全
Hsieh,Wen-Chyuan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育學系
Department of Education
論文出版年: 2000
畢業學年度: 88
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 283
中文關鍵詞: 團隊團隊管理
英文關鍵詞: team, team-management
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:148下載:22
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

摘 要
本研究之主要目的,在於探討團隊管理基本概念與運作,進以了解國民中小學運用團隊管理的情形與障礙,最後根據研究結論,提出改進國民中小學實施或改善團隊管理之建議。
為達上述目的,本研究採用文獻分析與問卷調查的方法。首先進行文獻分析,以瞭解團隊管理的意涵與相關理論,並探討團隊管理的功能、原則、實施步驟,及團隊管理在學校的運用。其次根據文獻探討內容,編製「國民中小學團隊管理研究調查問卷」,進行調查研究,藉以瞭解團隊管理基本概念、學校實施團隊管理情況(委員會、處室、會議方面)及學校實施團隊管理的成效性及可行性。
本研究調查對象分成三類,一為學校人員;二為主管教育行政機關成員;三為專家學者。一共發出1084份問卷,實得有效問卷680份;問卷資料處理則採用SPSS for Windows統計套裝軟體進行統計分析。
根據文獻分析與問卷調查發現,得到以下結論:
一、 團隊應具備一些基本條件,才能運作良好。然目前學校各種團隊並未充分具備這些條件;其中以「成員經常 進修」、「成員輪流擔任領導者」及「成員士氣高昂」等條件最差。
二、 學校實施團隊管理可發揮多重正面功能;然目前學校在發揮團隊管理正面功能上,成效普遍不彰。
三、 學校實施團隊管理若運行不當則易生問題。目前學校最常面臨的問題是「決策時間冗長導致成本增加」及「 導致學校組織內部的衝突」。
四、 學校運用團隊管理需遵循一些基本原則,方能有效。然目前學校並未充分做到這些原則,其中以「增強成員 專業知能」、「建立領導者正確心態」方面表現最差。
五、 學校實施團隊管理時應循序進行,方能成功。但目前學校在團隊管理實施步驟表現不佳,尤以「教育訓練專 業成長」、「成果評估考核成效」及「給予成員適當回饋並協助改進」兩步驟及回饋機制的表現最差。
六、 學校應依團隊性質不同而有不同存續時間。目前學校委員會及會議偏向依性質再決定是常設性或暫時性團隊 ,而處室則以常設性團隊為宜。
七、 目前學校各種團隊對學校決策的影響力大;其中以「處室」居冠,「會議」及「委員會」次之。
八、 目前學校運用團隊管理卓有成效的事務不多;其中教務方面以「教科書選用」,訓導方面以「導護工作」, 人事方面以「教師任用」成效較好,至於公關和總務方面則有待努力。
九、 目前學校團隊運作成效仍不盡理想。然其中運作成效較好的團隊為:委員會中的「教評會」,處室中的「教 務處」、「訓導處」,會議中的「校務會議」。
十、 對學校組織而言,團隊管理是可行且必需的創新管理方式。
十一、不同背景變項填答者對學校團隊管理的意見大同小異。
另根據文獻探討內容、本調查研究結果及研究者意見,提出落實、改善團隊管理的建議:
一、 主管教育行政機關與學校應重視團隊管理理念及運作現況之宣導,以利團隊管理的推動。
二、 學校應落實團隊管理的原則及步驟,以充分發揮團隊管理應有的功效。
三、 學校實施團隊管理應先克服「決策時間冗長導致成本增加」、「導致學校組織內部衝突」的問題。
四、 學校實施團隊管理應以提升成員工作績效為最終目標。
五、 校長應拋棄科層體制下一人獨大的觀念,扮演好聯結者及資源提供者角色,以利於團隊管理的落實。
六、 教師應扮演教學者和學校共同經營者角色,積極加入學校團隊管理的行列。
七、 應提高教師參與校務動機,以利團隊管理的落實。
八、 進修內容應加強法令及管理新知的講授,以減少推動團隊管理時的阻力,提升學校團隊管理成效。
九、 教育行政主管機關及學校組織應採取積極的配合措施,以助於團隊管理的落實。
十、 學校應積極推動團隊管理,對於表現較差的團隊或工作事務應加強輔導。

Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to study general ideas and practices of team-management, and research conditions and obstacles. Finally, the findings obtained form this study shall serve as references for further studies and suggestions for improving team-management in elementary and junior high schools.
In order to achieve the above-stated purpose, this paper adopted literature analysis and questionnaire investigation methods. First, the researcher used literature analysis to probe into the meanings, related theories, functions, principles, steps of team-management, and its usage in schools. Second, according to the context of literature analysis, the researcher arranged an investigation questionnaire-"the study of team-management in elementary and junior high schools ". An investigation that based on this questionnaire collected and examined the opinions of team-management in schools.
The subjects of this study, with sample size of 1084 subjects and the effective number of 680 samplers, are randomly selected from school staffs, administrative office staffs, and experts. Data of this study is analyzed by means of SPSS.
The results of literature analysis and survey have produced the following conclusions:
1. There are some basic conditions of team-management, but some teams in schools do not have these conditions, including "staffs pursue advanced study ", "staffs become leaders in turn", "the spirit of staffs are high".
2. It can develop a lot of positive functions to practice team-management, but the achievement of team-management is not good in schools.
3. The most common problems that faced by schools during implementing team-management inappropriately include "the decision time too long to decrease cost" and "the internal conflicts of the schools".
4. There are several fundamental principles to apply team-management; but schools presently still leave much to be demanded, including "increasing staffs' professional knowledge" and "building leaders' correct attitude".
5. It must be step by step to practice team-management. Some steps are not practiced well in schools, especially "professional education training", "evaluating achievements", "giving feedback and assistance".
6. According to different mission, teams should have different duration time. School councils and meetings should be permanent or temporary according to their nature. School offices are better to be permanent teams.
7. Each team has great influence on school decision-making, especially school offices.
8. There are few effective affairs using team-management in schools. Like choosing books in Office of Academica Affairs, employment of teachers in Office of Student Affairs, and so on.
9. The effects of practicing team-management don't work in practice. But some teams work better, including the Office of Academica Affairs , teaching, the Office of Student Affairs, the Teacher Council, and the School Meeting.
10. For school organization, team-management is a feasible and need creative management style.
11. The staffs with different backdrop variable have different opinions toward the application of team-management.
In order to develop the performance of team-management, suggestions for the application of the team-management to elementary and junior high schools are as follows:
1. The educational authorities and schools should publicize the ideas and conditions of team-management.
2. Schools should accomplish the principals and steps of team-management.
3. Before practicing team-management, schools should break some bars, including "the decision time too long too decrease cost" and "the internal conflicts of the schools".
4. The final goal of team-management is to promote working performance of staffs.
5. Principals should give up autarchy, and act good roles who are good linkers and resource providers.
6. Teachers should act teaching and managing role. Additionally, they must engage school management with warm heart.
7. Schools should promote staffs' motives to participate in school affairs.
8. Staffs' learning should include laws and new management knowledge.
9. The educational authorities should take some tactics.
10. Schools should practice team-management positively, and give some guidances and assistances if it is necessary.

目 錄 第一章 緒論 …………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………1 第二節 研究方法與步驟……………………………………………3 第三節 研究範圍與名詞解釋………………………………………5 第四節 研究架構與限制……………………………………………7 第二章 團隊管理的基本概念與相關理論 …………………………11 第一節 團隊管理的意涵……………………………………………11 第二節 團隊管理的相關理論………………………………………21 第三節 團隊管理的功能……………………………………………39 第三章 團隊管理的運作 ……………………………………………67 第一節 團隊管理的原則……………………………………………67 第二節 團隊管理的實施步驟………………………………………85 第三節 團隊管理在學校的運用……………………………………103 第四章 調查研究設計與實施 ………………………………………135 第一節 調查研究工具之編製………………………………………135 第二節 調查研究對象與樣本選取…………………………………138 第三節 調查研究實施與資料處理…………………………………143 第五章 調查結果分析與討論 ………………………………………149 第一節 團隊管理基本概念之分析與討論…………………………149 第二節 學校實施團隊管理情況之分析與討論─委員會方面……165 第三節 學校實施團隊管理情況之分析與討論─處室方面………181 第四節 學校實施團隊管理情況之分析與討論─會議方面………195 第五節 學校實施團隊管理成效性之分析與討論…………………211 第六節 學校實施團隊管理可行性之分析與討論…………………229 第六章 結論與建議 …………………………………………………237 第一節 調查研究結果發現…………………………………………237 第二節 結論…………………………………………………………241 第三節 建議…………………………………………………………246 第四節 對進一步研究之建議………………………………………256 參考資料………………………………………………………………257 中文資料 ……………………………………………………………257 英文資料 ……………………………………………………………260 附錄……………………………………………………………………267 附錄一 國民中小學團隊管理研究調查問卷(預試)………………267 附錄二 國民中小學團隊管理研究調查問卷(正式)………………275 附錄三 委託函 ……………………………………………………283

中文資料
丁志權(民85)。英國中小學學校管理委員會之研究。嘉義師院學報,10期,頁231-259。
小知堂編譯(民83)。組織行為與設計。譯自Cushway, B. & Lodge, D.: Organisational behavior and design. 台北:小知堂。
文林譯(民82)。建立團隊。譯自Maddux, R. B.: Team building. 台北:麥田。
方美智譯(民85)。超越管理迷思-重新探索管理真諦。譯自Eccles, R. G., Nohria, N., & Berkley, J. D.: Beyond the hype-rediscovering the essence of management. 台北:天下。
王受榮(民86)。從立法角度看台灣教育制度的改革。載於新世紀的教育發展。台北:師大書苑。
王銳添(民84)。現代企業管理。台北:臺灣商務印書館。
吳若權(民83)。管理心主張。台北:商周文化事業股份有限公司。
吳清山(民80)。學校行政。台北:心理。
吳清山(民83)。美國教育組織與行政。台北:五南。
吳清山(民86)。有效能的學校。台北:國立教育資料館編。
吳惠強(1998)。建設觀:學校管理新理念。中小學教育管理,60期,頁2-4。
吳嘉文譯(民88)。成功團隊。譯自The Messcon group:Strengthening teamwork-participant's Guide. 北市:洪葉文化。
李奉儒(民85)。美國教育改革機構、法案與報告書。載於各國教育改革動向。台北:師大書苑。
李慕華、林宗鴻譯(民85)。工商心理學導論。譯自Muchinsky, P. M.: Psychology applied to work : An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology, 4th ed. 台北:五南。
周文祥、慕心譯(民87)。巨變時代的管理。譯自Peter F. D.: Managing in an time of great. 台北:天下。
周旭華譯(民83)。發展型管理。譯自:Lessem R.: Developmental management-Principles of holistic buiness. 台北:天下。
思穎譯(民85)。追求卓越的團隊趨勢。譯自Larson C. E. & Fasto F. L.:Team work:what must go right what can go wrong. 台北:業強出版。
范揚松(民84)。適才適所慎挑工作夥伴-團隊成員的選用與安置。震旦月刊,287期,頁7-9。
秦夢群(民88)。教育行政-理論部分。台北:五南。
高銘章譯(民83)。管理學-功能與策略。譯自Bateman和Zeithaml: Management --Function & Strategy. 台北:西書。
尉謄蛟譯(民83)。高績效管理。台北:皇冠。
崔智強(民87)。未來領袖。譯自John R. Hoyle: Leadership and futuring.台北:書華。
張弘勳(民86)。國民中小學實施學校本位管理之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
張明輝(民87)。學校行政革新專輯。台北:台灣師大。
張明輝(民88)。學校教育與行政革新研究。台北:師大書苑。
張虹(1998)。群體決策初探。中小學教育與管理,61期,頁2-5。
張德銳(民84)。教育行政研究。台北:五南。
張德銳(民85)。美國教育改革的重建學校運動。載於各國教育改革動向。台北:師大書苑。
張潤書(民74)。組織行為與管理。台北:五南。
符宇忠、錢斌(1990)。中國教育管理學導論。南京:南京出版社。
郭進隆譯(民83)。第五項修練 : 學習型組織的藝術與實務。譯自Seng:The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization。台北:天下。
陳俊玄(民1997)。目標管理在學校體育組織教學上的應用。台灣省學校體育,7卷6期,頁13-20。
陳鳴譯(民77)。管理的藝術。台北:志文。
單文經(民85)。美國教育芭革中州的作法與地方學區的因應。載於各國教育改革動向。台北:師大書苑。
彭淑珍(民87)。學習型組織理論在國民中學行政應用之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
曾燦金(民85)。美國學校本位管理及其我國國民中小學實施可行性之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
游琬娟譯(民87)。致勝團隊。譯自Morris, S., Willcoles, G. & Knasel, E.台北:中天出版。
黃政傑(民85)。教育改革的理念與實踐。台北:師大書苑。
黃景良(民87)。國民中學教師參與管理之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
黃嘉雄(民87)。英國學校管理委員會組織及權責之探討。國民教育,38卷4期,頁59-60。
楊俊雄(民83)。組織中團隊特性與組織變革關係之研究-以我國國營事業民營化為例。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版。
楊瑩(民85)。一九八八年後英國的教育改革。載於各國教育改革動向。台北:師大書苑。
萬維綱譯(民73)。管理精粹。譯自Robert Townsend:Further up the organization. 台北:皇冠。
葉連祺(民87)。度過過渡--落實教評會選才功能。彰化文教季刊,44期,頁22-31。
賈春琦(民88)。團隊型組織在國民中學學校行政應用之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
廖孟秋(民84)。團隊時代來臨-團隊運作的特色與維持。震旦,287期,頁4-6。
廖洲棚(民86)。團隊型組織之溝通訊息傳遞過程:符號與資訊科技互動的研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文,未出版。
齊若蘭(民84)。團隊出擊。譯自Deborah Harrington-Mackin: The team building tool kit - tips , tactics, and rules for effective workplace teams. 台北:天下。
齊若蘭譯(民88)。第五項修練-實踐篇(下)。譯自:The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook-Strategies and tools for building a learning organization。台北:天下。
劉立倫(民74)。卓越的組織。譯自James Lewis,Jr.:Excellent Organizations. 台北:頂淵文化事業有限公司。
劉明德、鄭伯壎等譯(民82)。管理學:競爭優勢。譯自:Management: The competitive edge。台北:桂冠。
劉清彥譯(民88)。管理聖經大師。譯自Joseph & Jimmie: Tguru guide-The best ideas of the top management thinkers. 台北:周南。
潘正德(民77)。團體動力。台北:心理。
潘正德(民88)。團體動力學。台北:心理。
蔡承志等譯(民75)。組織行為 : 概念.論題與應用。譯自羅賓森原著。台北:桂冠。
蔡培林(民82)。國民中學學校管理型態與學校效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
賴明福(民88)。英國學校管理委員會在我國中小學實施之可行性研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
謝文全(民74)。教育行政。台北:文景。
謝文全(民82)。教育行政-理論與實務。台北:文景。
謝文全(民84)。比較教育行政。台北:五南。
西文資料
American Association of School Administrators (1979). The administrative leadership teams. Superintendent career development series No5, pp.8-32. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 204 843).
Anderson, M. E. (1988). The management team. patterns for success. OSSC Bulletin , v31(6). pp.6-18. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 296 443).
Anonymous (1991,7). School of Empowerment. Training & Development.
Anonymous (1999). Team management system. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.anbar,co.uk/courseware/mba/team. (vistes 18 December, 1999).
Bainbridge, W. L. & Evans, G. C. (1981). The management team: Making it work. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 212 034).
Blake, R. R. & Mouton, J. S. (1985). The managerial grid III : A new look at the classic that has boosted productivity and profits for thousands of corporations worldwide. Houston: Gulf Pub.
Bluck, R. (1996). Library training guides- Team management. British: Library Association publishing.
Bursk, E. C. (1955). The management team. cambridge. Harvard University Press.
Clune, W. H. & White, J. F. (1988). Choice and control in american education. N.Y.: Falmer.
Cook, M. (1982). Scoocer coaching & team management. Southampton: EP publishing.
Crawford, M., Kydd, L. & Riches, C. (1997). Leadership and teams in educational management. Buckingham: Open University press.
Daniels M. L. (1989). Research related to the concept of team management. NHT(D)89-16991.
DfEE (2000a). Introduction. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.dfee.gov.uk/triggerpack/14_tp.html (visited 18 February, 2000).
DfEE (2000b). Support for governors.〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.dfee.gov.uk/triggerpack/1_tp.html (visited 18 February, 2000).
DfEE (2000c). Accountability. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.dfee.gov.uk/triggerpack/3_tp.html (visited 18 February, 2000).
DfEE (2000d). Meetings of the governing body. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.dfee.gov.uk/triggerpack/4_tp.html (visited 18 February, 2000).
DfEE (2000e). Special education needs. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.dfee.gov.uk/triggerpack/10_tp.html (visited 18 February, 2000).
DfEE (2000f). The governing body and the staff. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.dfee.gov.uk/triggerpack/11_tp.html (visited 18 February, 2000).
DfEE (2000g). Shape our future-become a school governor. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.dfee.gov.uk/governor/schgov.html (visited 18 February, 2000).
DfEE (2000h). Guidance. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.dfee.gov.uk/governor/guidance.html (visited 18 February, 2000).
DfEE (2000I). Good practice. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.dfee.gov.uk/governor/goodprac.html (visited 18 February, 2000).
DfEE (2000j). The main work. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.dfee.gov.uk/governor/mainwork.html (visited 18 February, 2000).
DfEE (2000k). Annexess. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.dfee.gov.uk/governor/annexgg.html (visited 18 February, 2000).
DfEE (2000n). Report of the advisory group on governors.〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.dfee.gov.uk/governor/agog.html (visited 18 February, 2000).
Erickson, K. A., & Rose, R. L. (1973). Management teams in educational adminstration ideals?practical?both?OSSC Bulletin, v17 (4) , pp.1-26.( ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 084 662).
Forsty, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics(3th ed). Boston: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Gaziel, H. A. (1992). Team management patterns and school effectiveness. European Journal of Education, v27(1/2), pp153-163.
Genck, F. H. (1984). Improving school performance : How new school management techniques can raise learning, confidence, and morale. N.Y.: Praeger.
Gleason S. C., Donohue N. & Leader G. C. (1995,12-1996,1). Boston revisits school-based management. Educational Leadership, pp.24-27.
Greenberg J. & Baron R. A. (1995). Behavior in organizations(4th ed). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Greenberg, J. S. (1996). Comprehensive stress management (5th ed). Madison : Brown & Benchmark.
Grindle, B. W. (1982). Team management: Four essential components. Clearing House, v56(1), pp:29-33. (EJ 269 728)
Hackman, J. R., Lawler, E. E. & Porter, L. W.(1983). Perspectives on behavior in organizations(2nd ed). N.Y. : McGraw-Hill.
Hanson, E. M. (1991). Educational administration and organizational behavior. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
Harvey, D. & Brown, D. R. (1995). An experiential approach to organization development. New Jorsey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Harvey, D. & Brown, D. R. (1996). An experiential approach to organization development. New Jorsey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Hayes, N. (1997). Successful team management. NY: International thomson business press.
Hess, G. A. (1991). School restructuring, Chicago style. California: Corwin Press Inc.
Hill, J. C. & English, F. W. (1991). Total quality education : transforming schools into learning places. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press.
Jones F. B. & Villines R. T. (1987). Japanese management: What is it and can it be used in education? Planning and Changing, v18(4), pp.246-251.(EJ 376 195)
Lashway, & Larry, (1997). Visionary leadership. ERIC Digest 110. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC-Digests/ed402643.html (visited 10 december, 1999).
Liker, R. (1961). New patterns of management. NY: Mcgraw-Hill.
Lindelow, J. & Bentley, S. (1988). Team management. In" school leadership: handbook for excellence". pp.135-151. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 309 150).
Lindelow, J. & Bentley, S. (1989). School leadership: handbook for excellence ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 309 510).
Maclure, S. (1992). Education re-formed : A guide to the education reform act. London : Hodder & Stoughton.
Maira, A. & Scott-Morgan P. (1997) The accelerating organization: Embracing the human face of change. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Cop.
Margerison C. & McCann D. (1990). Team management-practical new approacher. London: Sekforde House.
McBeath, G. (1990). Practical management development-strategies for management resourcing and development in the 1990s. Cambridge: Butler & Tanner Ltd.
Nadler, D. A., Spencer, J. L. & Associates, (1998). Executive teams. San francisco: Jossey-Bass.
NAGM (2000). About NAGM. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.nagm.org.uk/about.html (visited 18 February 2000).
Newstron J. W. & Davis K. (1997). Organizational behavior、human behavior at work. NY: McGraw-Hill company.
NGC (2000). Education in the next millennium. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.ngc.org.uk/general_meetings/1999/1999_AGMHT.html (visited 18 February 2000).
Nilsson, W. P. (1984). Management development at Hewlett-Packard. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 249 592).
Oswald, L. J. (1996). Work team in schools. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.edu.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed391226.html (visited 20 January).
Oswald, L. J.(1995). School-Based Management. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 384 950).
Owens, R. G. (1991). Organizational behavior in education(4th ed). Tokyo: Prentive-Hall of Japan Inc.
Owens, R. G. (1995). Organizational behavior in education(5th ed). Tokyo: Prentive-Hall of Japan Inc.
Parker, G. M. (1996). Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business strategy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bassy Pub.
Pellicer L. O. & Nemeth, G. (1980). Tired of carrying the world on your shoulders? Try team management. NASSP Bulletin, v64(439), pp.97-102.(EJ 234140).
Rader H. B. (1988). Creative library leadership for the 1990s: Using team management to ensure two-way communication in an academic library. pp.1-21. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 304 137).
Rainey, E. E. (1983). How to communicate with wour professional stall: Build the proper climate, pp.1-7. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 242 010).
Scholtes, P. R., Bayless, D. L., Massaro, G. A. & Roche, N. K. (1994). The team handbook for educators- How to use teams to improve quality. N.Y.: Joiner Associates Inc.
Seng, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline : The art and practice of the learning organization. N.Y.: Doubleday.
Sharp, W. L. & Walter, J. K. (1997). The school superintendent-The profession and the person. Pennsylvania: Technomic Publishing Company.
Stevens, K. R. & Pellicer, L. O. (1984). Team management: Quick relief from the minor aches and pains of school business management. School Business Affairs, v50(11), pp.53-55. ( EJ 311 693)
Team Management System. (1999). Worldwide research. 〔WWW page〕 URL http://www.tms.com.au/tms04.html (visited 12 December, 1999).
Tjosvold, D. & Tjosvold, M. M. (1991). Leading the team organization : How to create an enduring competitive advantage. N.Y.: Lexington Books.
Tjosvold, D. (1992). Team organization- An enduring competitive advantage. N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons.
Tjosvold, D. (1993). Team organization: An enduring competitive advantage. N.Y.: Wiley.
Tjosvold, D.(1986).Working together to get things done. Massachusetts: D. C. Health & Company Lexington Books.
Wallace, M. & Huckman, L. (1996). Senior management teams in large primary schools: A headteacher's solution to the complexities of post-reform management? School Organisation, v16(3), pp. 309-232.
Weihrich, H. (1985). Management excellence : productivity through MBO. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
Wellins, & George, (1991). The ket to self-directed teams. Training & Development Journal, Aprill 1991, pp.26-29.
Wellins, R. S., Byham, W. C. & Dixon, G. R. (1994). Insides teams: How 20 world-class organizations are winning through teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub.
Wynn, R. & Guditus, C. W. (1984). Team management: Leadership by consensus. London: Abell & Howell Company.

QR CODE