簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 施乃華
Shih, Nai-hua
論文名稱: 新移民子女與本國籍一般子女的創造力研究-開放性人格特質之中介效果
The creativity ability and tendency between immigrant and native students in Taiwan - the mediating effect of Openness.
指導教授: 陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih
徐芝君
Hsu, Chih-chun
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 114
中文關鍵詞: 新移民子女開放性創造力中介效果
英文關鍵詞: Immigrant families students, openness, creativity, mediator effect
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:325下載:54
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究目的為檢視新移民子女與本國籍一般子女在人格特質、創造力認知層面與情意層面的差異情形,並探討開放性、嚴謹性人格特質對族群與創造力認知層面、情意層面關係的中介效果。研究者採用問卷調查法,調查對象為臺灣地區國民中、小學學生1076位,其中新移民家庭子女431位,非新移民家庭子女645位。研究工具包括「五因素人格量表」、「新編創造思考測驗-圖形部份」及「威廉斯創造傾向量表」。結果如下:1. 新移民子女在創造力認知層面的流暢力、變通力、獨創力向度及創造力認知層面總分(T分數)之表現均顯著高於本國籍一般子女,在精進力向度則未達顯著差異;在創造力情意層面的冒險性、好奇性、想像性、挑戰性向度及創造力情意層面平均得分,新移民子女也顯著高於本國籍一般子女的表現;2. 新移民子女開放性人格顯著高於本國籍一般子女,不過,新移民子女與本國籍一般子女的嚴謹性人格則未達顯著差異;3. 在創造力認知層面上,開放性人格部分中介族群與流暢力之關係,而完全中介族群與變通力、獨創力及創造力認知層面總分(T分數)的關係,顯示流暢力的表現,同時受到族群與開放性人格兩變項的影響,而變通力、獨創力、創造力認知層面總分(T分數)則是完全受到開放性人格的影響。在創造力情意層面上,開放性人格部分中介族群與冒險性、想像性、創造力情意層面平均得分之關係,而完全中介族群與好奇性、挑戰性之關係,意謂著冒險性、想像性、創造力情意層面平均得分的表現,同時受到族群與開放性人格兩變項的影響,而好奇性、挑戰性則完全受到開放性人格的影響。最後依據研究結果討論本研究意義和價值,並對未來研究及新移民子女教育實務提出建議。

The purpose of present study is to compare the differences of personality, and cognition and tendency of creativity between the students of immigrant and native families, and to discuss the mediator effect of the personality traits Openness and Conscientiousness as well. The questionnaires are used as research tools and are applied to 1076 elementary and junior high school students, including 431 immigrant families students and 645 native families students. The questionnaires are including “Big-five mini-markers, traditional Chinese edition”, “The New Tests of Creative Thinking, figure task(Wu et al., 1999) ”, and “Creativity Assessment Packet”.
Results are as following:
1. Comparison from the cognition aspect of creativity, the T-score of students from immigrant families is apparently higher than the students from native families in Fluency, Flexibility, Originality and the overall performance of creativity, while the difference isn’t significant between groups in Elaboration; Comparison from the tendency aspect of creativity, the performance of the students from immigrant families is also better than the students from native families in Risk Taking, Curiosity,Imagination, Complexity and overall creativity.
2. The T-score of Openness in immigrant families students is obviously higher than in native families students, while the difference of Conscientiousness between two groups is not significant.
3. In the cognition aspect of creativity, Openness is partially interpretative to the relationship of groups and Fluency while it is wholly interpretative to the
relationship of groups and Flexibility, Originality and overall creativity. It is shown that the Fluency is affected together by the groups and Openness, and Flexibility,Originality and the overall creativity are influenced by Openness. In the tendency aspect of creativity, Openness is partial interpretative to the relationship of groups,and Risk taking, Imagination, and overall creativity while it is fully interpretative to
the relationship of groups and Curiosity, Complexity. It means that Risk taking,Imagination, and overall performance of creativity are affected together by the groups and Openness; Curiosity and Complexity are influenced by the Openness.Present research provides meaningful and valuable results and suggests to the future study of new immigrant family education.

誌謝詞 i 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 v 目次 vii 表次 ix 圖次 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題 5 第三節 名詞釋義 6 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 新移民子女的形成背景及其相關研究 9 第二節 創造力的內涵、理論及其相關研究 17 第三節 人格特質的內涵、理論及其相關研究 35 第四節 人格特質與創造力之相關研究 44 第五節 研究假設 49 第三章 研究設計與實施 51 第一節 研究架構 51 第二節 研究對象 53 第三節 研究工具 56 第四節 研究實施程序 62 第五節 資料處理 64 第四章 研究結果 65 第一節 不同族群者在創造力認知、情意表現之差異分析 65 第二節 不同族群者在人格特質上之差異分析 69 第三節 以開放性、嚴謹性特質為中介檢驗族群與創造力之關聯性 70 第五章 討論與建議 83 第一節 綜合討論 83 第二節 建議 89 參考文獻 93 中文部分 93 英文部分 100 附錄 112 附錄一「五因素人格量表」使用同意書 112 附錄二「新編創造思考測驗」使用同意書 113 附錄三「威廉斯創造傾向量表」使用同意書114

中文部分
丁興祥(1991)。中國傑出思想家的成長背景研究:以宋元明思想家為例。中央研究院主辦「中央研究院族學研究所行為研究組小型專題研討會」發表之論文(臺北)。
丁興祥、陳明穗、蔡啟通、邱皓政、李宗沅(1991)。「羅塞浦創造傾向量表修訂報告」。測驗年刊,38,189-200。
薛秀宜、陳利銘、洪佩圓(2006)。人格理論新紀元:人格五因素模式之測驗工具與其研究應用。研習資訊,23(1),109-118。
張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。台北市:東華書局。
陳英豪、吳裕益(1981)。Rookey編製的賓州創造傾向量表指導手冊。高雄:復文圖書出版社。
內政部統計處(2012)。101年國人結婚登記之外籍與大陸港澳配偶人數統計。取自內政部網站: http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=6920,2013年3月。
內政部統計處(2012)。101年嬰兒出生數。取自內政部網站:http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=6773&page=1,2013年3月。
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸臺(2000)。創造力硏究。臺北,心理出版社。
王瑞壎(2003)。大陸和外籍新娘婚生子女適應與學習能力之探究。臺灣教育,626,52-31。
石文宜(2005)。國中生人格特質、師生互動關係與偏差行為之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北市。

任育瑩、詹雨臻、陳學志(2011)。國中生幽默風格與創造力之相關研究。教育曙光-香港教師會教育學報,59(1),145-153。
向芳誼(2006)。臺北市國民小學東南亞新移民子女學校適應之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
朱倩儀(2009)。 在職進修成人學習者思考風格與創造力之相關研究。屏東教育大學學報教育類,32, 359-392。
江致寬(2012)。彰化縣國小高年級學童人格特質與霸凌行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。南華大學,嘉義縣。
吳念蓉(2007)。Give Me a Hand-花蓮縣國小進行新移民子女補救教學之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學,花蓮縣。
吳韶雯(2007)。新移民子女學校適應及因應策略之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
吳靜吉、高泉豐、王敬仁、丁與祥(1981)。拓弄思圖形創造思考測驗甲式指導及研究手冊。臺北:遠流出版社。
吳靜吉、高泉豐、王敬仁、丁興祥(1981)。拓弄思語文創造思考測驗乙式指導及研究手冊。臺北:遠流出版社。
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1999)。新編創造思考測驗研究。臺北:教育部訓育委員會。
李文盛(2007)。新移民子女與非新移民子女的自我概念與學習態度、成就動機之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台中教育大學,臺中市
李瑛(2006)。邁向「他者」與「賦權」:新移民女性的學習與教學之探討。教育研究月刊,141,25-36。
李德高(1991)。創造心理學。臺北:五南。

李慧賢(1996)。原住民學生創造力發展及其相關因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,臺北市。
李慧馨(2007)。從歷史和文化的觀點談臺北新住民教育。北縣教育,62,4-9。
沈淑蓉(1999)。廣告設計科學生創造力及其相關因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。 國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
周秀潔(2004)。外籍配偶子女的學校適應-教師的覺知與應對(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
林水見(2009)。高中職學生幽默風格、嘲笑風格與人格特質之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗。臺北:心理。
林彩岫(2006)。新移民子女教育-多元文化教育的討論。國立臺中教育大學主辦「新移民子女教育學術研討會」發表之論文(臺中)。
林維彬(2007)。基隆市新移民與本國籍子女的家長教養信念、教育期望與成就動機之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育,臺北市。
林璣萍(2003)。臺灣新興的弱勢學生--外籍配偶子女學校適應現況之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺東大學,臺東縣。
柯乃文(2006)。臺東縣外籍與大陸配偶子女之學習適應及其相關影響因素(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺東大學,臺東縣。
紀詩萍(2007)。新移民子女學習適應現況及其促進策略(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
胡光宗、盧臺華(2005)。國小原住民兒童創造潛能與創造性環境之研究一以阿美族為例。特殊教育研究學刊,29,313-336。

婦女新知基金會(2003)。「不要叫我外籍新娘!」記者會。取自婦女新知基金會網站:http://www.awakening.org.tw/chhtml/topics_dtl.asp?id=98 ,2013年3月18日。
張芳全(2005)。外籍配偶子女的教育問題及其政策規劃。國民教育,45(4),32-37。
張柏樾(2012)。金門縣新移民子女之生活適應與行為偏差相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
張碧珊(2006)。國小一年級外籍配偶子女注音符號能力之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。臺北:教育部。
教育部(2005)。外籍配偶就讀國小子女學習及生活意向調查結果摘要分析。取自教育部網站:https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/analysis/brief.pdf,2013年3月16日。
教育部統計處(2012)。新移民子女就讀國中小學生人數。取自教育部網站:https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/analysis/son_of_foreign_100.pdf,2013年3月16日。
莊家欣(2006)。外籍配偶之子女族群認同及自我概念之相關研究:以臺南縣為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所,台南市。
莫藜藜、賴佩玲(2004)。臺灣社會少子化與外籍配偶子女的問題初探。社會發展季刊,101,176-181。
連英伶(2006)。異國婚姻子女家庭壓力.自尊與行為適應之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。
郭靜姿、張蘭畹、王曼娜、盧冠每(2000)。文化殊異學生學習潛能評估之研究,特殊教育研究學刊,19,253-278。
郭靜晃、薛慧平(2004)。外籍配偶母職轉換困境與需求之探析—以東南亞外籍女性配偶為例。社區發展季刊,105,116-133。
陳金蓮(2004)。四位外籍配偶子女學校適應之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院,花蓮縣。
陳淑惠(1996)。臺灣地區學生創造力發展及其相關因素之研究-年級、性別、教師教學創新行為、父母教養態度、社會支持與創意經驗、創造思考能力之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
陳湘淇(2003)。國小一年級外籍配偶子女在智力、語文能力及學業成就表現之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
陳瑩庭(2009)。臺北縣新移民子女父親教養態度與人格特質、學習態度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學碩士論文,臺北市。
陳奐宇(1999)。創造思考教學對圖形創造力影響之研究--以國小四年級與六年級普通班為比較(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學碩士論文,臺北市。
陳學志、賴惠德(2011)。教師創造性教學、個人目標導向對新移民及本地生之領域一般與領域特定的創造力影響。中山大學主辦「國科會99年度『多元族群的科學教育學門』研究計畫成果討論會」發表之論文(高雄)。
陳龍安(1993)。創造力訓練手冊。臺北:臺北市立師範學院。
陳龍安、朱湘吉(1999)。創造與生活。臺北:五南圖書。
黃旐濤、黃秋玉、陳淑美、勞賢賢(2008)。各級學校新臺灣之子現況與困境之研究。美和科技大學主辦「2008南臺灣幼兒保育學術研討會」論文集(屏東)。
黃毅志(2003)。「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估:社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊,49(4),1-31。

楊國樞(1981)。中國人的性格與行為:形成及蛻變。中華心理學刊,23(1),39-55。
楊詠梅(2003)。外籍新娘的優生保健與健康。文教基金會會訊,69,49-53。
楊耀忠(1995)。如何解決新移民學童所面對的問題。現代教育通訊,36,4-5。
葉玉珠(2000)。「創造力發展的生態系統模式」及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析。教育心理學報,32(1),95-122。
葉玉珠、吳靜吉、鄭英耀(2000)。影響科技與資訊產業人員創意發展的因素之量表發展。師大學報,45(2),39-63。
詹雨臻、陳學志、卓淑玲、Martin, R. A.(2011)。區分良善與有害的幽默:中文版幽默風格量表的發展【專刊】。測驗學刊,專刊期,207-234。
劉世南、郭誌光(2002)。創造力理論的發展:一個心理構念演進的省思。資優教育季刊,85,20-30。
劉行五(2012)。新移民子女自我概念、壓迫因素、社會支持與偏差行為關聯性 之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
劉秀燕(2003)。跨文化衝擊下外籍新娘家庭環境及其子女行為表現之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
劉英國(2006)。 家庭社會場域中文化資本影響外籍配偶家庭學童的學習表現之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。 國立臺南大學,臺南市。
潘裕豐(2004)。學校創造力指標建構探究。創造思考教育,14,19-25。
蔡瑞全(2006)。臺灣、外籍與大陸配偶子女學校適應之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學,花蓮縣。
蔡翠玲(2006)。臺中市國小高年級新移民子女與非新移民子女學童在自我概念與生活適應之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。

盧秀芳(2004)。在臺外籍新娘子女家庭環境與校生活適應之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
蕭昭娟(2000)。國際遷移之調適研究:以彰化縣社頭鄉外籍新娘為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
謝紹文(2007)。新移民子女的依附關係與學校適應研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
鍾德馨(2005)。我國外籍配偶子女教育問題及因應策略之探討。學校行政雙月刊,40,213-225。
羅巧玲(2011)。中部地區幼兒教師創造力人格特質與教學效能之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
鐘鳳嬌、王國川(2004)。外籍配偶子女的語文、心智能力發展語學習狀況調查研究。教育學刊,23,231-258。
張鳳燕、楊妙芬、邱珍琬、蔡素紋(譯)(2002)。人格心理學─策略與議題(原作者:Liebert, R. M., & Liebert, L. L.)。台北:五南。

英文部分
Abell, D. J., & Lennex, L. (1999). Gifted education: Don't overlook the disadvantaged. AL: Mid-South Educational Research Association.
Allport, G.W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity:A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.
Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy:Toward new conceptualizat ions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185-201.
Amabile, T., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. , & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management, 39, 1154-1184.
Amabile,T. M. (1996).Creativity in context:Update to the social psychology of creativity.Oxford:Westview Press.
Austin, E. J., Saklofske, D. H., & Egan, V. (2005). Personality, well-being and health correlates of trait emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 547-558.
Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 963-970.
Baldwin, A. Y. (1987). I'm Black but look at me, I am also gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 180-185.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44,1-26.
Barrio, V. D., Aluja, A., & Garcia, L. F. (2004). Relationship between empathy and Big-Five personality traits in a sample of Spanish adolescences. Social Behavior and Personality, 32 (7), 677-682.
Barron, F. (1969). Creative Person and Creative Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32 , 439-476.
Beeko, E. O. (2005). Creative processes in Akan musical cultures: Innovation within tradition.Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Benet-Martínez, V., Lee, F., & Leu, J. (2006). Describe your culture: Cultural representations in biculturals.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 386-407.
Bowser, A. G. & Hejazinia-Bowser, S. (1990). A general study of intermarriage in the United States. Journal of Architectural Education, 44 (3), 163-171.
Brislin, R., Lonner, W., & Thorndike, R. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods.New York: Wiley.
Caspi, A., Roberts, B.W., & Shiner, R. (2005). Personality development. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453-484.
Church, A. T., & Katigbak, M. S. (2000). Trait Psychology in the Philippines. American Behavioral Scientist, 44 (1), 73-95.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa.FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Croply, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning: a guide for teachers and educators. London: Kogan Page.
Crutchfield, R. S. (1962). Contemporary Approaches to Creative Thinking. New York: Atherton.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Davenport, T. H., Prusak, L.,& Wilson, H. J. (2003).Who’s Bringing You Hot Ideas and How are You Responding? Harvard Business Review, 81 (2), 58-64.
Davis, G.A. (1986). Creativity is forever. IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Dewaele, J.M., & Van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2009). The effect of multilingualism/multiculturalism on personality: No gain without pain for third culture kids? International Journal of Multilingualism , 6, 443-459.
Dewaele, J.M., & Stavans, A. (2012). The effect of immigration, acculturation and multicompetence on personality profiles of Israeli multilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1 , 1-19.
Deyoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins. D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73 (4), 824-858.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model.Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
Duncan,O. D. (1961). A socio-economic index for all occupations and Properties and characteristics of the socioeconomic index, in Occupations and Social Status (A.J. Reiss,Ed). NY: Free Press.
Dwifht, S. A., Cumming, K. M., & Glenar, J. L. (1998). Comparison of criterion-related validity coefficients for the Mini-Markers and Goldberg's Markers of the Big Five Personality Factors. Journal of Personality Assessment , 70 (3), 541-550.
Edwin, C. S., Emily, J. S., & John, C. H. (2005).The creative personality. Gifted Child Quarterly,49, 300-314.
Erdheim, J., Wang, M., & Zickar, M. J. (2006). Linking the big five personality constructs to organizational commitment. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 959-970.
Ewen, R. B. (1998). Personality: A topical approach. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eysenck, H. J. (1970). Handbook of personality : Theory and research .New York :Guilford Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147-178.
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 290-309.
Feldman, J. M. (1999). Four questions about human sociall behavior. In J.Adamopoulos and Y. Kashima (Eds.), Social Psychology and Cultural Context: Essays in Honor of Harry C. Triandi s ( pp. 290-332 ). New York: Sage.
Frasier, M. M., & Passow, A. H. (1994). Toward a new paradigm for identifying talent potential. The University of Connecticut: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology,51 (1), 115-134.
Furnham, A., Monsen, J., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2009). Typical intellectual engagement, Big Five personality traits, approaches to learning and cognitive ability predictors of academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 79, 769-782.
Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Dean, K. K. (2004). The individual as“melting pot”: The flexibility of bicultural self-construals. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 22 (2), 181-201.
Gary,A. C. (1990). Cross-national marriage in Sweden:Immigration and assimilation . Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30 (3) ,363-380.
Gay, J. E. (1978). A proposed plan for identifying black gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 353-359.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513-524.
Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. J. (1962). Creativity and Intelligence: Explorations with Gifted Students. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Goff, K., & Torrance, E. P. (1999). Discovering & Developing Giftedness through Mentoring. Gifted Child Today Magazine, 22 (3),14-15.
Goldberg, L. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology ( pp. 290-332 ) . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Goldberg., L. R. (1992). The development of the markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
Griffin, M. & McDermott, M. R. (1998). Exploring a tripartite relationship between rebelliousness, openness to experience, and creativity. Social Behavior and Personality, 26, 347-356.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality . New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford, J. P. (1975). Varieties of creative giftedness, their measurement and development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19, 107-121.
Guilford, J.P. (1971). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hall, C. C. I. (1980). The ethnic identity of racially mixed people: A study of Black-Japanese. Unpub- lished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Hampson, S.E., & Goldberg, L.R. (2006). A first large cohort study of personality trait stability over the 40 years between elementary school and midlife. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 763-779.
Helms, J. E. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in cognitive ability testing? American Psychologist, 47, 1083-1101.
Hilliard, A. G. (1976). Alternative to IQ testing:An approach to the identification of the gifed minority children. Sacramento: California State Department of Education.
Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). Handbook of creativity. New York: Plenum Press.
Jenks, C., Perman, L ., & Rainwater, L. (1988). What is a Good Job? A measure of labor market success. American Journal of Sociology, 93 (6) ,1322-57.
Johansson, F. (2004). The Medici Effect: Breakthrough Insights at the Intersection of Ideas, Conceptsand Cultures. MA :Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Johnson, R. (1992). Offspring of cross-race and cross-ethnic marriage in Hawaii. Newbury Park: CA.
Johnson, R. C., & Nagoshi, C. T. (1986). The adjustment of offspring of within-group and interracial/intercultural marriages: A comparison of personality factor scores. Journal of marriage and the family, 48, 279-284.
Kahn, J. S., & Denmon, J. (1997). An examination of social science literature pertaining to multiracial identity: A historical perspective. Journal of Multicultural Social Work , 6, 117-138.
Kelly, K. E. (2006). Relationship between the Five-Factor Model of Personality and the Scale of Creative Attributes and Behavior: A validation study. Individual Differences Research, 4, 299-305.
Kelly, W. E. (2004). The "Ocean" and the Night-Sky: Relations between the Five-Factor Model of personality and noctcaelador. College Student Journal, 38 (3), 406-408.
Kwang, N. A., & Rodrigues, D. (2002). A Big-Five Personality Profile of the Adaptor and Innovator. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36 (4), 254–268.
Leung, A. K. Y., & Chiu, C. Y. (2008). Interactive Effects of Multicultural Experiences and Openness to Experience on Creative Potential. Creativity Research Journal, 20 (4), 376-382.
Leung, A. K., Maddux, W., Galinsky, A.,& Chiu, C (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169-181.
Leung, A. K.Y., & Chiu, C. Y. (2010). Multicultural Experience, Idea Receptiveness, and Creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41 (6), 723-741.
Lounsbury, J. W. & Gibson, L. W. (2002). Personal Style Inventory: A work-based personality measurement system. Knoxville, Tennessee: Resource Associates.
Lounsbury, J. W., & Loveland, J. M. (2003). An investigation of psychological sense of community in relation of Big Five personality traits. Journal of Community Psychology, 31 (5), 531–541.
MacDonald, K. B. (1998). Evolution, culture, and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 119-149.
Mackinnon,D.W. ( 1965).Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20 ,273-281.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. NewYork, NY: Van Nostrend.
Mastor, K. A., Jin, P., & Cooper, M. (2000). Malay culture and personality. American Behavioral Scientist, 44 (1), 95-112.
Mayer, R. E. (1999). The promise of educational psychology: Learning in the content areas. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258-1265.
McCrae, R. R. (1989). Why I advocate the five-factor model: Joint analyses of the NEO-PI and other instruments.New York: SpringerVerlag.
McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Journal of Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323-337
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60 (2), 174-214.
McCrae, R. R., Yik, M. S., Trapnell, P. D., Bond,M. H., & Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Interpreting personality profiles across cultures: Bilingual, acculturation and peer rating studies of Chinese undergraduates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (4), 1041-1055.
McGue, M., Bacon, S., & Lykken, D. T. (1993). Personality stability and change in early adulthood: A behavioral genetic analysis. Developmental Psychology,29, 96–109.
McRoy, R., & Freeman, E. (1986). Racial identity issues among mixedrace children. Social Work in Education, 8, 164-174.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 44 (2) , 220-232.
Mellou,E. (1996).The two conditions view of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30 (2) ,126-149.
Menchaca, M. (1997). Early racist discourses: The roots of deficit thinking. New York: Falmer.
Michel, M., & Dudek, S. Z. (1991). Mother-child relationships and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 4 (3) , 281-286.
Mooradian, T. A., & Nezlek, J. B. (1996). Comparing the NEO-FFI and Saucier's mini-markers as measures of the big five. Personality and Individual Differences, 21 (2), 213–215.
Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The big five personality dimension: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 153-200.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
Oakland, T., Pretorius, J., & Lee, D. H. (2008). Temperament Styles of Children from South Africa and the United States. School Psychology International, 29, 627-639.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (3), 607-635.
Olver, J.M., & Mooradian, T. A. (2003). Personality traits and personal values: a conceptual and empirical investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 109-125.
Pervin, L. A. (1993). Personality : Theory and research (6th). New York : John Wiley & Sons.
Pervin, L. A. (1994). A critical analysis of current trait theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 103-113.
Pervin, L. A., Cervone, D., & John, O. P. (2005). Personality: Theory and Research (9th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Poston, C. (1990) . The biracial identity development model: A needed addition.Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 152-155.
Repucci, L. C. (1993) . The nature of creativity (4th). NY: Cambridge.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.
Richardson, M., & Abraham, C. (2009). Conscientiousness and achievement motivation predict performance. European Journal of Personality, 23, 589-605.
Rogers, C. (1962). Toward a theory of creativity . In H. H.Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation ( pp. 290-332 ). NewYork, NY: Harper & Row .
Root, M. P. (1990). Resolving”other”status : Identity development of biracial individuals. Women and Therapy, 9, 185-205.
Rossman, J. (1931).The Psychology of the Inventor: A Study of the Patentee.. Washington,D.C. :Inventors Publishing .
Rothenberg, A., & Hausman, C. R. (1976). The creativity question.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories, themes, practice. Philadelphia, CA: Academic Press.
Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63 (3), 506-516.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933-958.
Simonton, D. K. (1997). Genius and creativity: Selected papers. Greenwich, CT : Ablex.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sloane, K. D. (1985). Home influences on talent development. New York: Ballantine Books.
Stein, M. I. (1967). Explorations in creativity . New York:Harper.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity.NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.
Swenson, J. E. (1978). Teacher-assessment of creative Behavior in Disadvantaged Children.Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 338-343.
Tadmor, C. T., & Tetlock, P. E. (2006). Biculturalism: A model of the effects of second-culture exposure on acculturation and integrative complexity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37 (2), 173-190
Taylor, I. A., & Getzels, J. W. (1975) .Perspectives in creativity . Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
Teng, C. I., Hsu, K. H., Chien, R. C., & Chang, H. Y. (2007). The influence of personality on care quality of hospital nurses. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 22 (4), 358-364.
Teng, C. I. (2008). Personality differences between online game players and nonplayers in a student sample. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11 (2), 232-234.
Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary Mental Abilities.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition-Verbal Tests, Forms A and B-Figural Tests. Princeton,NJ: Personnel Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1969). Creativity. Sioux Falls, ND: Adapt Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1972) . Can we teach childern to think creatively? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114-143.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrence Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Lexington, MA: Ginn.
Vernon, P. E. (1970). Creativity: Selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Wakefield, W. D., & Hudley, C. (2007). Ethic and racial identity and Adolescent wellbeing. Theory Into Practice, 46 (2), 147-154.
Walker, A. M., Koestner, R., & Hum, A. (1995). Personality correlates of depressive styles in autobiographies of creative achievers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29, 75-94.
Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt Brace Janonovica.
Wehrly, B., Kenney, K.R., & Kenney, M. E. (1999). Counseling multiracial families.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Wiggins, J. S., & Trapnell, P. D. (1997). Handbook of personality psychology . San Diego: Academic Press.
Williams, F. E. (1980). The Creativity Assessment Packet. Chesterfield, MO: Psychologists and Educators Inc.
Williams, R. F. (2009). Black-white biracial students in American schools: A review of the literature. Review of Eductional Research, 79 (2), 776-804.
Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality,15, 297-310.
Woodman, R. W., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1990). An Interactionist Model of Creative Behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24 (4), 279-290.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.
Woods, S. B., & Achey, V. H. (1990). Successful identification of gifted racial/ethnic group students without changing classification requirements. Roeper Review, 13, 21-26.
Yogev, A., & Jamshy, H. (1983). Children of ethnic intermarriage in Israeli schools: Are they marginal. Journal of Marriage and the family, 45, 965-974.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Weber, A. L. (1994). Psychology. New York: HarperCollins.

下載圖示
QR CODE