近年來數位出版發展迅速，越來越多的人透過數位平台與相關的科技，取代傳統的紙本學習。然而，數位學習無法深入文字訊息或了解深刻的內涵。這樣的現象導致學習者獲得的知識是淺薄且記憶短暫的，容易被遺忘甚至被表面化，進而大量依賴片面的資訊來了解訊息。傳統的紙本學習在知識獲取的細緻度勝過數位出版，但是由於缺乏互動與超連結等多媒體技術，紙本學習可能無法給予學習者多元的想法與刺激。因此，利用新的技術配合紙本學習將能有效合併兩者的優勢，使學習策略獲得更進一步的進化。
本研究嘗試以擴增實境做為橋樑，結合數位內容與傳統紙本書籍。為了能有效利用擴增實境將物理空間的實體與數位化訊息連結的特質，本研究提出擴增實境輔助學習之Reality-Virtual-Reality （RVR）架構，包含實體層、技術層、應用層與心理層等四個層次，充分定義與描繪擴增實境在學習策略上的現象、使用方式以及影響。此外，本研究也透過RVR架構發展出擴增實境學習輔助系統，用以驗證擴增實境在各種心理層面的效應與影響，並針對RVR架構心理層的學習行為、知識建構以及意識形成做出探討。
本研究透過四個實驗以驗證RVR架構的內涵與成效，包括觀察、發展、驗證以及遷移。實驗結果發現：
(1) 擴增實境能有效提升學習者的知識建構成效。
(2) RVR架構能增加學習者之互動性以及評價意願。
(3) RVR架構能強化長期記憶持久。
(4) RVR架構能影響意識形成，強化主觀立場。
(5) RVR架構能遷移至紙本學習以外的目標。
本研究最後根據RVR架構提出了可靠與有效的擴增實境應用學習策略指引，提供未來的學習與科技之整合方略。

In recent years, digital publishing has developed rapidly. More and more people have replaced traditional paper reading with digital platforms and related technologies. However, digital reading cannot help in understanding the message or the meaning in depth. This phenomenon results in the readers gaining shallow knowledge that is easily forgotten and then relying heavily on one-sided information to understand an issue. Traditional paper reading is better than digital reading in terms of the precision of knowledge acquisition. However, due to the lack of multimedia technologies such as interactivity and hyperlinking, paper reading may not be able to give readers multiple ideas and stimuli. Therefore, the use of new technologies combined with paper reading will effectively help readers obtain the advantages of both, such that their reading strategy will further evolve.
This study attempts to use augmented reality as a bridge, combining digital content with traditional paper books. In order to use augmented reality effectively to connect the physical object with digital information, this study proposes augmented reality-assisted reading reality-virtual-reality (RVR) architecture, including a physical layer, technical layer, application layer, and psychological layer. The RVR architecture fully defines and depicts the phenomena and usage of augmented reality and its impact on reading strategies. In addition, this study has also developed an augmented reality reading assistance system through the RVR framework to verify the effects and impacts of augmented reality on various psychological levels. It also discusses the reading behavior, knowledge construction, and consciousness formation of the psychological layer of RVR architecture.
Finally, through four sub-experiments, including observation, development, verification, and migration, this research found:
(1) Augmented reality can effectively improve the effectiveness of learners’ knowledge construction.
(2) RVR architecture can increase the reader’s interaction and willingness to make an evaluation.
(3) RVR architecture can strengthen long-term memory endurance.
(4) RVR architecture can influence the formation of consciousness and strengthen the subjective position.
(5) RVR architecture can be transformed into other physical goals.
This research finally proposes an RVR multiple reading strategy frameworks to provide a reliable and effective strategy guide for the integration of future reading and technology.

Akçayır, M., Akçayır, G., Pektaş, H. M., & Ocak, M. A. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 334-342.
Albrecht, U. V., Folta-Schoofs, K., Behrends, M., & Von Jan, U. (2013). Effects of mobile augmented reality learning compared to textbook learning on medical students: randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of medical Internet research, 15(8), e182.
Almind, T. C., & Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: Methodological approaches to'webometrics'. Journal of documentation, 53(4), 404-426.
Asai, K., Kobayashi, H., & Kondo, T. (2005, July). Augmented instructions-a fusion of augmented reality and printed learning materials. In Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05) (pp. 213-215). IEEE.
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
Azuma, R., Lee, J. W., Jiang, B., Park, J., You, S., & Neumann, U. (1999). Tracking in unprepared environments for augmented reality systems. Computers & Graphics, 23(6), 787-793.
Beale, R., & Lonsdale, P. (2004, September). Mobile context aware systems: The intelligence to support tasks and effectively utilise resources. In International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 240-251). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Cabiria, J. (2012). Augmenting engagement: Augmented reality in education. In Increasing student engagement and retention using immersive interfaces: Virtual worlds, gaming, and simulation. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Chang, K. E., Chang, C. T., Hou, H. T., Sung, Y. T., Chao, H. L., & Lee, C. M. (2014). Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum. Computers & education, 71, 185-197.
Chang, Y. L., Hou, H. T., Pan, C. Y., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Apply an augmented reality in a mobile guidance to increase sense of place for heritage places. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 166-178.
Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). The interaction of child–parent shared reading with an augmented reality (AR) picture book and parents' conceptions of AR learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 203-222.
Civelek, T., Ucar, E., Ustunel, H., & Aydın, M. K. (2014). Effects of a haptic augmented simulation on K-12 students’ achievement and their attitudes towards physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(6), 565-574.
Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?. Progress in brain research, 169, 323-338.
Damala, A., Cubaud, P., Bationo, A., Houlier, P., & Marchal, I. (2008, September). Bridging the gap between the digital and the physical: design and evaluation of a mobile augmented reality guide for the museum visit. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts (pp. 120-127).
Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586-596.
Diegmann, P., Schmidt-Kraepelin, M., Eynden, S., & Basten, D. (2015). Benefits of augmented reality in educational environments-a systematic literature review. Benefits, 3(6), 1542-1556.
Dinayusadewi, N. P., & Agustika, G. N. S. (2020). Development Of Augmented Reality Application As A Mathematics Learning Media In Elementary School Geometry Materials. Journal of Education Technology, 4(2).
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22.
Dünser, A. (2008). Supporting low ability readers with interactive augmented reality. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine, 6(1), 39-46.
Dutã, M., Amariei, C. I., Bogdan, C. M., Popovici, D. M., Ionescu, N., & Nuca, C. I. (2011). An overview of virtual and augmented reality in dental education. Oral Health Dent Manag, 10, 42-49.
Gartner Inc.. (2013). Survey analysis: Consumer digital reading preferences reveal the exaggerated death of paper. Retrieved on September 3, 2013, from http://www.gartner.com/ resId¼1651116\.
Geary, P., Kelley, K., & Woodburn, D. (1978). Focus on the stars. (ERIC ED171567)
Gervautz, M., & Schmalstieg, D. (2012). Anywhere interfaces using handheld augmented reality. Computer, 45(7), 26-31.
Gregory, C. L. (2008). " But I want a real book": an investigation of undergraduates' usage and attitudes toward electronic books. Reference & user services quarterly, 266-273.
Grimm, P. (2010). Social desirability bias. Wiley international encyclopedia of marketing.
Hartshorne, J. K., & Makovski, T. (2019). The effect of working memory maintenance on long-term memory. Memory & cognition, 47(4), 749-763.
Hawkins, D. T. (2000). Electronic books: A major publishing revolution. Part 2: The Marketplace. Online (Weston, CT), 24(5), 19-36.
Hill, R. (2010). Turning the Page: Forget about Those Bulky Backbreakers, Digital Textbooks Are the Future. School Library Journal, 56(10), 24-27.
Hou, L., & Wang, X. (2013). A study on the benefits of augmented reality in retaining working memory in assembly tasks: A focus on differences in gender. Automation in Construction, 32, 38-45.
Huang, T. L., & Liao, S. (2015). A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: the moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 269-295.
Hudlicka, E. (2003). To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human–computer interaction. International journal of human-computer studies, 59(1-2), 1-32.
Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109-123.
Ibáñez, M. B., Di Serio, Á., Villarán, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1-13.
Israel, S. E., & Duffy, G. G. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of research on reading comprehension. Routledge.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology New York. Holt and company.
Jeong, H. (2012). A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library.
Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 Horizon Report. New Media Consortium. 6101 West Courtyard Drive Building One Suite 100, Austin, TX 78730.
Julesz, B., & Guttman, N. (1963). Auditory memory. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35(11), 1895-1895.
Khan, T., Johnston, K., & Ophoff, J. (2019). The impact of an augmented reality application on learning motivation of students. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2019.
Kikas, E. (1998). The impact of teaching on students' definitions and explanations of astronomical phenomena. Learning and instruction, 8(5), 439-454.
Klopfer, E. (2008). Augmented learning: Research and design of mobile educational games. MIT press.
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental Detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational technology research and development, 56(2), 203-228.
Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138-149.
Lai, C.S., & Wu, C.H. (2005). The Study of the Hands-on Astronomical Instruction and Learning on Elementary School Students. Journal of National Taipei Teachers College, 18(1), pp. 59-86.
Levine-Clark, M. (2006). Electronic book usage: A survey at the University of Denver. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(3), 285-299.
Lin, T. J., Duh, H. B. L., Li, N., Wang, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). An investigation of learners' collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68, 314-321.
Littman, J., & Connaway, L. S. (2004). A circulation analysis of print books and e-books in on academic research library. Library resources and technical services, 48(4), 256-262.
Liu, T. Y. (2009). A context‐aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 515-527.
Liu, T. Y., Tan, T. H., & Chu, Y. L. (2007, July). 2D barcode and augmented reality supported English learning system. In 6th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS 2007) (pp. 5-10). IEEE.
Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment. Journal of documentation.
Liu, Z. (2012). Digital reading. Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science (English edition), 85.
Lu, W., Wang, M., & Chen, H. (2020, June). Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Protection Based on Augmented Reality Technology. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1574, No. 1, p. 012026). IOP Publishing.
Lyons, M. (2011). Books: A living history (p. 215). California: J. Paul Getty Museum.
Mahmoudi, M. T., Mojtahedi, S., & Shams, S. (2017). AR‐based value‐added visualization of infographic for enhancing learning performance. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(6), 1038-1052.
Marcell, M. M., & Armstrong, V. (1982). Auditory and visual sequential memory of Down syndrome and nonretarded children. American Journal of mental deficiency.
Mathews, J. M. (2010). Using a studio-based pedagogy to engage students in the design of mobile-based media. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 9(1), 87-102.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbooks in psychology. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (p. 43–71). Cambridge University Press.
McCall, R., Wetzel, R., Löschner, J., & Braun, A. K. (2011). Using presence to evaluate an augmented reality location aware game. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 15(1), 25-35.
Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
Mulloni, A., Wagner, D., & Schmalstieg, D. (2008, September). Mobility and social interaction as core gameplay elements in multi-player augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts (pp. 472-478).
Newhagen, J. E. (1997). The role of feedback in the assessment of news. Information Processing & Management, 33(5), 583-594.
Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H. R., Rowlands, I., Dobrowolski, T., & Tenopir, C. (2008, May). Viewing and reading behaviour in a virtual environment: The full-text download and what can be read into it. In Aslib proceedings: New information perspectives (Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 185-198). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Civitas Books.
Olsson, T., Kärkkäinen, T., Lagerstam, E., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2012). User evaluation of mobile augmented reality scenarios. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 4(1), 29-47.
Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1971). Short-term sequential memory for pictures and words. Psychonomic Science, 24(2), 50-51.
Pellas, N., Fotaris, P., Kazanidis, I., & Wells, D. (2019). Augmenting the learning experience in primary and secondary school education: A systematic review of recent trends in augmented reality game-based learning. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 329-346.
Perra, C., Grigoriou, E., Liotta, A., Song, W., Usai, C., & Giusto, D. (2019, September). Augmented reality for cultural heritage education. In 2019 IEEE 9th International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE-Berlin) (pp. 333-336). IEEE.
Picard, R. W., & Klein, J. (2002). Computers that recognise and respond to user emotion: theoretical and practical implications. Interacting with computers, 14(2), 141-169.
Radu, I. (2012, November). Why should my students use AR? A comparative review of the educational impacts of augmented-reality. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) (pp. 313-314). IEEE.
Ramaiah, C. K. (2012). Electronic Books: A Bibliography. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 32(2).
Ranganath, C., Cohen, M. X., & Brozinsky, C. J. (2005). Working memory maintenance contributes to long-term memory formation: neural and behavioral evidence. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 17(7), 994-1010.
Rose, S., Potter, D., & Newcombe, M. (2010). Augmented Reality: A Review of available Augmented Reality packages and evaluation of their potential use in an educational context.
Sak, R. J., & Ruben, R. J. (1981). Recurrent middle ear effusion in childhood: Implications of temporary auditory deprivation for language and learning. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 90(6), 546-551.
Sampaio, D., & Almeida, P. (2018, July). Students’ motivation, concentration and learning skills using Augmented Reality. In 4th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAD'18) (pp. 1559-1566). Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education, 79, 59-68.
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 74(11), 1.
Squire, K. D., & Jan, M. (2007). Mad City Mystery: Developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of science education and technology, 16(1), 5-29.
Vincenzi, D. A., Valimont, B., Macchiarella, N., Opalenik, C., Gangadharan, S. N., & Majoros, A. E. (2003, October). The effectiveness of cognitive elaboration using augmented reality as a training and learning paradigm. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 47, No. 19, pp. 2054-2058). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Wang, C., Zhang, X., & Hann, I. H. (2018). Socially nudged: A quasi-experimental study of friends’ social influence in online product ratings. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 641-655.
Wang, K. H., Chen, L. C., Chu, P. Y., & Cheng, Y. M. (2009, July). A study on the design of Augmented Reality user interfaces for mobile learning systems in heritage temples. In International Conference on Virtual and Mixed Reality (pp. 282-290). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Wang, M., Callaghan, V., Bernhardt, J., White, K., & Peña-Rios, A. (2018). Augmented reality in education and training: pedagogical approaches and illustrative case studies. Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing, 9(5), 1391-1402.
Wang, X., & Chen, R. (2009). An experimental study on collaborative effectiveness of augmented reality potentials in urban design. CoDesign, 5(4), 229-244.
Waugh, N. C., & Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory. Psychological review, 72(2), 89.
Wei, X., Weng, D., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course. Computers & Education, 81, 221-234.
Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & education, 62, 41-49.
Wu, L. J., Weng, S. E., Chang, K. E., Lan, Y. J., & Sung, Y. T. (2009, December). The effect of the game-based problem-posing system for mathematical learning. In 17th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2009 (pp. 35-39).
Yim, H. B., & Seong, P. H. (2010). Heuristic guidelines and experimental evaluation of effective augmented-reality based instructions for maintenance in nuclear power plants. Nuclear engineering and design, 240(12), 4096-4102.
Zhang, J., & Chang, K. E. (2019, July). Applying augmented reality to improve the outcomes of procedural knowledge acquisition. In 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (Vol. 2161, pp. 340-343). IEEE.
Zhang, J., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2012, September). Designing a streamlined viewport strategy system to enhance performance in context awareness in mobile learning environments. In 2012 IIAI International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics (pp. 72-76). IEEE.
Zhang, J., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2014, August). UARE: Using reality-virtually-reality (RVR) models to construct Ubiquitous AR environment for e-Learning context. In 2014 Science and Information Conference (pp. 1007-1010). IEEE.
Zhang, J., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2014, August). UARE: Using reality-virtually-reality (RVR) models to construct Ubiquitous AR environment for e-Learning context. In 2014 Science and Information Conference (pp. 1007-1010). IEEE.
Zhang, J., Liu, T. C., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2015, September). Using augmented reality to promote homogeneity in learning achievement. In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality-Media, Art, Social Science, Humanities and Design (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Zhang, J., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2011, October). Using a mobile digital armillary sphere (MDAS) in astronomical observation for primary school students. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2632-2641). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Zhang, J., Sung, Y. T., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2014). The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & education, 73, 178-188.
張國恩、張珈(2020)。中華民國專利編號I690826。台北市：經濟部智慧財產局。