簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示
| 研究生： |
羅子惟 Lo, Tzu-Wei |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱： |
探討高涉入與極端高涉入對偏誤修正效果之差異 The Study of the Differential Correction Effect out of High Involvement versus Extremely High Involvement |
| 指導教授： |
蕭中強
Hsiao, Chung-Chiang |
| 學位類別： |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱： |
管理研究所 Graduate Institute of Management |
| 論文出版年： | 2017 |
| 畢業學年度： | 105 |
| 語文別： | 中文 |
| 論文頁數： | 45 |
| 中文關鍵詞： | 推敲可能性模型 、偏誤修正 、論證充足性 、涉入程度 |
| 英文關鍵詞： | Elaboration Likelihood Model, Bias correction, Argument sufficiency, Involvement |
| DOI URL： | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202202467 |
| 論文種類： | 學術論文 |
| 相關次數： | 點閱：124 下載：9 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
基於人們有動機持有正確的產品態度，在面對廣告資訊時，將盡可能排除偏誤因子或其他影響因素，以達到態度修正之精準判斷。
在行銷領域中，推敲可能性模型(ELM)時常用來衡量消費者的產品態度，本研究欲探討Kang and Herr於2006年發表文獻中之假說，在ELM與偏誤修正架構下，加入論證充足性作為一干擾變數，代言人作為偏誤因子，透過高與極端高涉入程度以及四種產品論證之操弄，進一步證實高涉入者在產品論證不充足的情況下，會如同Kang and Herr文獻中提及的極端高涉入者，皆以中央路徑處理廣告資訊，並且察覺代言人為無相關的產品核心資訊，視之為偏誤因子並做出偏誤修正行為，得以證實Kang and Herr於2006年文獻假說之矛盾。
In general, people like to hold correct attitude of the product. In order to achieve the goal of subjective correction, people will take effort to process the information about the target product, and remove the bias.
In this study, we discuss the argument sufficiency as a moderator under the theory of ELM and bias correction model, and try to explain the inappropriate hypotheses in Kang and Herr’s study in 2006. We set up an endorser as a bias, and manipulate different levels of high involvement, and compare argument quality under different conditions.
Kang and Herr’s study mentioned that people only with extremely high involvement can identify issue-irrelevant source as a bias, and make the correction of attitude. In this study, we verify that there is no different with high involvement. The bias correction would be triggered under argument insufficient situation for both high and extremely high involvement individuals.
邱羽麒(2008) 探討偏誤修正效果-以論點充足性作為干擾變數。碩士論文。新竹:國立清華大學科技管理研究所。
Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo & David Schumann (1983). Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10, No. 2 (Sep.), 135-146.
Yong-Soon Kang, Paul M. Herr (2006). Beauty and the Beholder: Toward an Integrative Model of Communication Source Effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 33,1；ABI/INFORM Global pg.123.
Duane T. Wegener and Richard E. Petty (1995). Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgement: The Role of Naïve Theories in Corrections for Perceived Bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.68, No.1, 36-51.
Kahle, Lynn R. and Pamela M. Homer (1985). Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research,11(March),954-61.
Petty, Richard E., Duane T. Wegener and Paul H. White (1998). Flexible Correction Process in Social Judgement: Implications for Persuasion. Social Cognition,16 (1), 93-113.
Petty, Richard E. & John T. Cacioppo (1986b). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of
Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19, ed., Leonard Berkowitz, New York: Academic Press, 123-205.
Peter H. Bloch & Marsha L. Richins (1983). A Theoretical Model for the Study of Product Importance Perceptions. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 47, 69-81.
Richard L. Celsi & Jerry C. Olson (1988). The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.15, September 1988.
