研究生: |
鍾明倫 Ming-Lun Chung |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國中好小子同儕文化研究:Paul Willis「文化創生」理論之應用與評析 The Study on the Peer Culture of Junior High School Students:The Application, Analysis and Criticize of the “Culture Production” Theory Proposed by Paul Willis |
指導教授: |
翁福元
Weng, Fwu-Yuan |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
公民教育與活動領導學系 Department of Civic Education and Leadership |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 171 |
中文關鍵詞: | P. Willis 、工人階級 、抗拒文化 、文化創生 、同儕文化 |
英文關鍵詞: | P. Willis, working class, resistance culture, culture production, peer culture |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:319 下載:47 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
研究者嘗試從階級在空間的文化鬥爭,以及工人階級文化歷史的特殊性,分析工人階級學生校園抗拒文化之文化政治意義,進一步論證Willis所提之文化創生(culture production)理論主張之合理性與正當性。本研究主要的關懷為,工人階級學生如何挪用原生階級所累積的文化符碼與工人文化慣習,動態地與教育中的政治機會結構相互動,而展現出詮釋權爭奪之文化政治的運動特質。
根據上述之研究動機,本研究之研究目的有三:(一)瞭解工人階級形成的歷史因素、文化特徵及其相關的教育理論與學說;(二)探究與評析Paul Willis工人階級國中學生校園抗拒文化理論與方法論;(三)以Paul Willis文化創生論證工人階級國中學生校園抗拒文化之脈絡性;(四)分析工人階級國中學生校園抗拒文化對我國學校制度與課程設計之蘊義。在研究方法上,為理解工人階級校園的抗拒文化,因此研究者採用教育俗民誌的研究取向,以參與觀察、訪談,以及文件分析等方法進行,將自己置身於學生生活的脈絡之中,以瞭解學生校園抗拒文化的動機、型態、意義、目的及影響。
本研究經過文獻探討,以及對研究參與者進行觀察、深入訪談以及文件分析後,本研究之結論如下:
(一) 好小子校園抗拒文化、家庭文化、街頭文化與工廠文化符應工人階級的性格。
(二) 好小子抗拒行為源於資本主義、管理主義與升學主義意識型態的洞察。
(三) 工人階級道德意識、勞動觀與父權結構對於抗拒文化之生成的限制
(四) 好小子校園願意承擔抗拒行為所需付出之代價,而不願意被霸權結構收編與宰制。
(五) 好小子校園抗拒文化之形構對於其工人階級職業之選擇具有深刻之影響性。
The researcher tried to analyze the cultural and political meaning of working class students’ resistance culture from the cultural struggle between classes within the space and the specialty of working class historical development, and we testified to the reason and legitimacy of the theory of culture production proposed by Paul Willis in the advanced stage.
The main concern on this study is about how the working class students took advantage on working class cultural code and habitus accumulated by the primitive class to interact with the political chances dynamically, and how they could show the peculiarity of the politics of culture movement on the argument of interpretation.
The purposes, according to the front concern, of this study are as followed:
1. To understand the historical factors, cultural peculiarity and pedagogical theorem or ism of the formative process of working class.
2. To probe into the theorem and methods of the resistance culture, proposed by Paul Willis, happened within the working class junior high school students.
3. To examine the reason of the culture resistance of working class junior high school students by means of theory of culture production.
4. To analyze how the meanings, provided from the cultural-resistance of working class junior high school students, contributed to the educational policy and system.
The results of the study showed that:
1. The lads’ resistance culture, family, street and factory match the characteristic of working class.
2. The lads’ insight toward the campus life includes capitalism, meritocracy, and managerialism.
3. Capitalism also restricts the working class students in the aspects of moral concepts, viewpoints of labor, and construct of patriarchy society.
4. The lads preferred to bear the burden caused from the resistance to value of campus custom instead of being predominated or surrendered.
5. The lads’ construction under the culture of resistance deeply affects the option of working class toward the occupations.
參考文獻
一、 中文參考文獻
Bourdieu, P. 著,刑克超譯(2002)。再生產:一種教育系統理論的要點。北京:商務。
Seabrook, J.著,譚天譯(2002)。階級:揭穿社會標籤迷思。台北:書林。
Weber, M.著,于曉等譯(2001)。新教倫理與資本主義精神。台北:左岸。
大前研一著,劉錦秀,江裕真譯(2006)。M型社會:中產階級消失的危機與商機。台北:商周。
三浦展著,吳忠恩譯(2006)。下流社會:新社會階級的出現。台北:高寶。
三浦展著,蕭雲菁譯(2007)。階級是會遺傳的:不要讓你的孩子跌入下流階級。台北:三采。
王文科(1994)。質的教育研究方法。臺北:師大書苑。
王文科(2001)。教育研究法--教育研究的理論與實務。五南書局。
江吉田(2004)。文化研究中的批判民族誌及其對比較教育研究的啟示-以Paul Willis 的《Learning to Labour》為例。國立暨南大學比較教育研究所,未出版,南投。
行政院主計處(2008)。人力資源調查統計年報。台北:作者。
行政院研究發展考核委員會編(1994)。死刑存廢之探討。台北:作者。
何明修(2004)。Paul Willis論階級與反抗學校文化。論文發表於2004年4月16-17日,第四屆《意識、權力與教育:教育社會學經典導讀》研討會。嘉義:南華大學。
何明修(2006)。台灣工會運動中的男子氣概。台灣社會學刊,36,65-108。
吳明清(1992)。教育研究基本觀念與方法之分析。五南書局。
吳毓真、鍾明倫、洪淑芬、翁福元(2007)。勞工階級國中學生校園次文化探討:Paul Willis「文化創生」概念的批判性省思與應用。論文發表於民國九十六年三月二十三日,屏東教育大學幼兒教育學系研討會,屏東:國立屏東教育大學。
呂金城(2003)。搶奪犯犯罪生活史與犯罪歷程之質化研究--以雲林縣為例。國立中正大學犯罪防制研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
呂鵬(2006)。生產底層與底層的再生產:從保羅•威利斯的《學做工》談起。2009年四月三十日擷取自http://www.sachina.edu.cn/Htmldata/article/-2006/06/1042.html
李旻陽(1991)。國中學生學業成績、師生互動與偏差行為關係之探討。私立中國文化大學兒童福利學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
李英明(2002)。社會衝突論。台北:揚智。
李錦旭(1998):Bowels 與 Gintis再製理論之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。未出版,台北市。
沈芳汶(2003)。師生言說型式及其對學習影響之個案研究------Bernstein言說符碼理論的驗證。國立台北教育大學國民教育研究所,未出版,臺北市。
周天賜(1996)。文獻探討。載於黃光雄、簡茂發(主編),教育研究法。台北:師大書苑。
林弘茂(1993)。高中生偏差行為成因之社會學理論分析與驗証。台灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
林立樹(2007)。現代思潮:西方文化研究之通路。台北:五南。
林柏儀(2006)。求學作為勞動:一個學校教育的馬克思主義分析。國立政治大學社會學研究所,未出版,台北市。
林麗琴(1995)。國民小學教師領導型態與學生疏離感相關之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
姚欣進(2004)。馬克思主義政治經濟學與世界資本主義。台北:巨流。
孫淑文(1990)。同儕關係與少年犯罪。國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
徐立志(2007)。工人階級內涵的歷史嬗變。河南理工大學學報,8(3),315-320。
翁福元(2007)。教育政策社會學。台北:五南。
馬傳鎮(1982)。少年犯的親子關係、家長社經地位、家庭背景及學校背景之調查研究。教育與心理研究,5,177-224 。
張保光(1985)。國民中學組織氣氛與學生疏離感之關係。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
張建成(1988)。學生疏離及其在班級團體中的關連因素。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
張建成、陳珊華(2006)。生涯管教與行為管教的階級差異:兼論家庭與學校文化的連續性。教育研究集刊,52(1),129-161。
張春興(1982)。心理學概要。台北:東華。
張德銳(1986)。台北市國民中學三年級學生次級文化與為規範過行為的關係。台灣師範大學教育研究所未出版之碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
畢恆達(1998)。社會研究的研究者與倫理。嚴祥鸞(主編),危險與秘密:研究倫理。台北:三民。
郭生玉(2001)。心理與教育研究法。精華書局。
陳幸仁(2007)。組織結構與教師行動的辯證關係:以一所小學為例。彰化師大教育學報,12,103-128。
陳奎憙(2001)。教育社會學導論。台北:師大書苑。
陳奎憙(2006)。現代教育社會學。台北:師大書苑。
陳彥文(2008)。國中男學生男子氣概之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
陳珊華(1997)。威里斯的文化創生觀點及其教育蘊義。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
陳淑玉(2006)。Paul E.Willis「反學校文化」觀點及其對課程設計之蘊義。國立台北教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
黃淑君(2000)。社會階級與青少年性別世界之建構-以台北都會區兩所國中為例。國立台灣師範大學碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
黃瑞琴(1997)。質的教育研究法。台北:心理。
黃毅志(2008)。改良版台灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表。臺東大學教育學報,19(1) ,151-159。
黃鴻文(2006)。高級中學學生文化之民族誌研究。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC94-2413-H-003-008),未出版。
楊昌勇(2004)。新教育社會學:連續與斷裂的學術歷程。北京市:中國社會科學。
葉雪梅(1989)。理論分析法。載於蔡保田(主編),教育研究法。高雄市:復文圖書。
詹念峰(2001)。語言、階級、教育-以一所國小教室內師生語言互動為例。國立花蓮師範學院多元文化研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮市。
甄曉蘭(2004)。質性資料的處理與分析。論文發表於2004年10月23日,國科會教育學門北區新進學者教育研究方法論研討會。台北:政治大學。
劉星(2006)。簡論《英國工人階級狀況》的階級倫理思想。南昌大學學報,37(6),11-14。
劉康盛(2004)。學校潛在課程之民族誌研究-資本的差異與實踐。國立花蓮師範學院多元文化研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮市。
潘慧玲(主編)(2004)。教育研究方法論:觀點與方法。台北:心理。
蔡保田(1987)。教育研究方法論。中國教育學會。師大書苑。
鄭英傑(2007)。揭露下課十分鐘之秘密—小六學生遊戲及其階級因素之探討。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
賴銀奎(2001)。我國解嚴後教育機會均等政策之研究--新馬克思主義分析。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
賴鑫城(1992)。國中學生自我概念、學業成就、師生關係對學校態度之研究。高雄師範大學育系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
戴曉霞(1997)。文化研究與教育研究。載於歐用生(主編),新世紀的教育發展。臺北:師大書苑。
薛荷玉(2007.04.20)。校園暴力偏差行為暴增八成。聯合報,C4版。
譚光鼎(1993)。中學選擇功能。教育研究資訊,1(4),272-290。
嚴祥鸞(1998)。危險與秘密:研究倫理(編者序)。嚴祥鸞(主編),危險與秘密:研究倫理。台北:三民。
二、 英文參考文獻
Aggleton, Peter J. and Geoff Whitty( 1985). Rebels Without a Cause? Socialization and Subcultural Style Among the Children of the New Middle Class. Sociology of Education 58, 60–72.
Alkin, M. C., Dailak, R., & White, P.(1979). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Alpert, B. (1991). Students’ resistance in the classroom. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 22. 350-366.
Althusser L.(1971). Essays on Ideology.London: Verso.
Anderson, G. L. (1989). Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status, and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 59(3), 249-270.
Anfara, V. (1995). The ritual and liminal dimensions of student resistance to the formal culture of schooling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans.
Anfara, V. A., Jr. (1996). The ritual and liminal dimensions of student resistance to the formal culture of schooling: The relational conditions that promote resistance. (ERIC No. ED392172).
Anyon, J. (1981). Elementary schooling and distinction of social class. Interchange, 12, 118-132.
Apple, M. ( 1982). Education and power. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H.A.(1985). Education under siege: The conservative, liberal and radical debate over schooling. Massachusette: Bergin & Garvey.
Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H.A.(1991). Postmodern education : Politics, culture and social criticism. University of Minnesota Press.
Aronowitz, S.(1977).Preface to the Morning Edition. In Willis (1977),Learning to Labour. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ball, S. (1990). Politics and policy making in Education. London: Routledge.
Ballantine, J. H. (1993). The Sociology of Education: A systematic analysis (3rd ed).,N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Barker, Chris. (2000). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage.
bell hooks(2000).Where we stand :class matters. NY: Routledge.
Bennett, K. P. and LeCompte, M. D. (1990). The Way Schools Work: A sociological analysis of education. London: Longman.
Bernstein, B. (1975).Class, codes and control: Towards a theory of educational transmissions. London: Routledge.
Bernstein, B. (1977). Towards a Theory of Educational Transmission. London: Routledge.
Blackledge, D. & Hunt, B.(1985). Sociological interpretations of education. London: Croom Helm.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). NY: Greenwood.
Bowls, S. & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in Capitalist America. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Brown, P. (1987). Schooling Ordinary Kids : Inequality Unemployment and the New Vocationalism. London : Tavistock.
Burawoy, M.(1985).The Politics of Production. London: Verso.
Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical Ethnography in Educational Research. New York : Routledge.
Clarke, J. , Critcher, C. & Johnson, Richard(1979). Working-class culture : studies in history and theory. New York : St. Martin's Press.
Cloward, R. A. & Ohlin. L. E. (1964). Delinquency and opportunity. New York: Fress Press.
Cohen, A. K. (1966). Deviance and control. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Cohen, S.(1980). Symbols of trouble: introduction to the new edition. In Cohen, S., Folk Devils and Moral Panics( second ed). Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Collins, J. L. (1995). Discourse and resistance in urban elementary classrooms: A poststructuralist perspective.(ERIC No. ED 386 506).
Connell, R., D. Ashenden, S. Kessler and G. Dowsett (1982).Making the Difference : Schools, Families and Social Division. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Coser, L. A.(1956). The function of social conflict. New York: Free Press.
Dale, R. (1989). The state and Educational Policy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Davies, S. (1995). Reproduction and Resistance in Canadian High Schools: An Empirical Examination of the Willis Thesis. British Journal of Sociology 46(4):662:687.
Davies, S.(1995). Leaps of Faith: Shifting Currents in Critical Sociology of Education. American Journal of Sociology, 100(6):1448-1478.
Dimitriadis, with P. Willis, Learning to labor in new times (pp. 167-196). New
Eckert ,P. (1989).Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York: Teachers College Press.
Feinberg, W. and Jonas S. (2004). School and Society(4th ed). New York : Teachers College Press.
Foley, D. E. (1989). Does the Working Class Have a Culture in the Anthropological Sense? Cultural Anthropology, 4(2),137-162.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York:Vintage Books. Furlong, V. J. (1985). The Deviant Pupil. Philadelphia : Open University Press.
Freire, P (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York:Continuum.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Gaskell, J. (1985). Course enrollment in the high school: The perspective of working-class females. Sociology of Education, 58, 48-59.
Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Education Review, 53(3), 257-293.
Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as Intellectuals: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning. Grandy, Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey.
Giroux, H. A. (1997). Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope: Theory, Culture, and Schooling: a Critical Reader. Colorado: Westivew Press.
Gordon, L.(1984. Paul Willis—Education, Cultural Production and Social Reproduction. British Journal of Sociology of Education,15(2) , 105-115.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
Greenwood, G. E., & Hickman, C. W. (1991). Research and practice in parent involvement: Implications for teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 91(3), 279-288.
Griffin, C. (2005). Whatever happened to the (likely) lads? 'Learning to Labour' 25 years on. British Journal of Sociology of Education,26(2), 291–297.
Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston : Beacon Press.
Hadberg, A. V. (2006).The methodology of Paul Willis. A review of Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids get Working Class Jobs. Athenea Digital, 9, 1-13.
Hall, S, & Jefferson, T.(1976). Resistance through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-war Britain. London & New York: Routledge.
Hammack, F. M. (1980). Review of learning to labour: How working class kids get working class job. American Journal of Education, 88(4), 510-518.
Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Methuen.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. California: University of California.
Holland, D. & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Educated in Romance: Women, Achievement and College Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Illich, I. (1971). Deschooling Society. N. Y.: Haper & Row.
King, G., Keohane, R. O., Verba, S. (1994), Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference. in Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Kipnis, A. (2001). Articulating school countercultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 32(4), 472-484.
Kleijer, H. and Tillekens, G. (2003).Twenty-five Years of Learning to Labour: Looking back at British cultural studies with Paul Willis. Retrieved from http://www.iccc.rug.nl/`soundscape/VOLUME05/Paul_WillisUK.shtm/.
Kneller, G. F. (1984). Movement of Thought in Modern Education.NY.:John Wiley & Sons.
Krueger R. A. & Casey M. A. (2000). Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Los Angeles. John Wiley&Sons.
Larson, R. W., & Richard, M. H. (1991). Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students. American Journal of Education, 99(4),418-443.
Lave, Jean, Paul Duguid, Nadine Fernandez, Erik Axel. 1992. Coming of Age In Birmingham. Annual Reviews in Anthropology, 1992. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc. ocial development, 4. NY : Wiley.
Leong, Laurence Wei-Teng. (1992). Cultural Resistance: The Cultural Terrorism of. British Male Working-Class Youth. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 12,29-58.
Levinson, B., Foley, D. and Holland, D. (1996) .The Cultural Production of the Educated Person. NY: Suny Press.
Lewis, J. (2002). Cultural Studies: the basics. London: Sage.
Liston, D. (1988). Capitalist Schools: Explanation and Ethics in Radical Studies of. Schooling .NY: Routledge.
Lundy, G. F. (2003).The myths of oppositional culture. Journal of Black Studies, 33(4), 450-467.
Mac an Ghaill, M. (1994). Local student cultures of masculinity and sexuality. In The making of men: Masculinities, sexualities and schooling (pp. 51-88). Phila-delphia: Open University Press.
Maccoby, E. E. & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family:Parent-child interaction. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.). P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 1-101). NY :John Wiley & Sons.
Maccoby, E. E. & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socializtion in the context of the family: parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen(Ed. ). Handbook of Child Psychology (4), pp.1-101. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
MacLeod, J. (1987). Ain't No Makin' It: Leveled Aspirations in a Low-Income Neighbor- hood. Boulder.CO: Westview Press.
Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.
Marx, K. (1969). Capital. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
McFadden, M. G. (1995) .Resistance to schooling and Educational Outcomes: questions of structure and agency. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(3), 293-308.
McLaren, P. (1998). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. New York: Longman.
McLaren, P. (1999). Schooling as a ritual performance: Towards a political economy of educational symbols and gestures. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
McLaren. P. (1986). Schooling as a ritual performance. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
McNeil, L.M. (1986). Contradictions of control: School structure and knowledge. New York: Methuen/Routledge & Kegan Paul.
McRobbie, A & Garber, J. (1991). Girls and subcultures. In In McRobbie, A., Feminism and Youth Culture.London: Macmillan.
McRobbie, A. (1991). Settling Accounts with Subculture: A Feminist Critique. In McRobbie, A., Feminism and Youth Culture. London: Macmillan.
Mehan, H. (1992). Understanding inequality in schools: The contribution of interpretive studies. Sociology of Education, 65(1), 1-20.
Miller, W.B.(1958). Lower Class Culture as a Generating Milieu of Gang Delinquency. Journal of Social Issue,s 14, 5-19.
Mills, D. and Gibb, R. (2001). Center’ and Periphery—An Interview with Paul Willis. Cultural Anthropology,16(3): 388-414.
Moore, R. (2004). Education and Society: Issues and Explanations in the Sociology of Education. Cambridge: Polity Press.
O’Toole, R. (1981). Book Review: Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs, by Paul E. Willis. Contemporary Sociology, 10(1), 158-159.
Shilling, C. (1992). Reconceptualising Structure and Agency in the Sociology of Education: Structuration Theory and Schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 13(1), 69-87.
Smith, P. (2001). Cultural Theory: An Introduction. New York. Blackwell.
Spradley J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. NY: Holt, Rihehart, and Winston.
Stanton-Salazar, R. D.(1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of radical minority children and youths. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1),1-40.
Tanner, J. (1990). Reluctant rebels: A case study of Edmonton high-school drop- outs. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 21(1), 79-94.
Thompson, E. P. (1968).The making of the English working class. Harmondsworth : Penguin.
Turner, G. (1990). British Cultural Studies: An Introduction. London: Unwin Hyman.
Walker, J. (1986). Romanticizing resistance, romanticizing culture: A critique of Willis'. theory of cultural production. The British Journal of Sociology,7(1), 59-80.
Walker, J. C. (1986).Rebels with our applause? A critique of resistance theory in Paul Willis’s ethnography of schooling. Journal of Education, 167( 2), 63-83.
Wallerstein, I. (1979). The Capitalist World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wexler, P. (1987). Social Analysis of Education: after the new sociology. London : Routledge & kegan Paul.
Williams, J. P. (2007). Youth-Subculture Studies: Sociological Traditions and Core Concepts. Sociology. Compass, 1 (2), 572–593.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class. jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
Willis, P. (1978). The Profane Culture. London: Routledge.
Willis, P. (1981).Cultural production is different from cultural reproduction is different from social reproduction is different from reproduction.Interchange,.12, (2-3), 48-67.
Willis, P. (1990). Common culture: Symbolic work at play in the everyday cultures of the young. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Willis, P. (1992). The Motor-Bike and Motor-Bike Culture.In B. Waites, T. Bennett and G. Martin. (Ed.), Popular Culture, Past and Present :A Reader. London: Croom Helm Ltd. and Open University.
Willis, P. (1997). Shop Floor Culture, Masculinity and the Wage Form. In John Clarke, et al.(Ed.), Working Class Culture: Studies in History and Theory(pp.185-198).London: Hutchinson.
Willis, P. (2000). The Ethnographic Imagination. Cambridge: Polity
Willis, P. (2004). Twenty-five years on: Old books, new times. In N. Dolby, & G.
Dimitriadis, with P. Willis, Learning to labor in new times (pp. 167-196). New
York: Routledge / Falmer.
Willis, P. E.(1979). Shop floor culture, masculinity and the wage form, In in R Johnson, J Clark & C Critcher (Ed.).Working class culture(pp.185–198) .London:Hutchinson,.
Willmontt, R. (1999). Structure, Agency and the Sociology of Education: Rescuing Analytical Dualism.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(1), 5-21.
Wilson, B. (1997). Youth cultures and subcultures. In L. J. Saha (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the sociology of education(pp.771-776). NY: Pergamon.
York: Routledge / Falmer.
Yu-Chen Wu, Ming-Lun Chung, I-Chien Li,Fwu-Yuan Weng, Wei-Ling Tang(2007.11.17~19). Integrating Moral Education into Junior High Working Class Students Resistant Culture: A Case Study of Taiwan. Paper presented at Association for Moral Education (AME, paper presentation) 2007 Conference. New York, November, 2007.