身處網際網路蓬勃發展的二十一世紀，圖書館必須要考量如何讓館內所典藏的資源與網際網路接軌，進而透過搜尋系統呈現在使用者眼前，然而，圖書館目前所使用的機讀編目格式MARC 21並沒有辦法做到這一點，為打破圖書館與網際網路的藩籬，BIBFRAME便應運而生。本研究目的為探討MARC 21轉換至BIBFRAME 2.0之過程，並且以臺師大圖書館《紅樓夢》印刷文字資料之書目為範例，分析《紅樓夢》MARC 21書目如何轉檔至BIBFRAME 架構，實體之間如何整併，以及欄位能夠如何調整，以因應將MARC 21格式轉置為BIBFRAME。

　　本研究採用架構分析方式，以實際書目進行轉檔，依據BIBFRAME 2.0之書目實體框架與《紅樓夢》MARC 21書目欄位的映射，找出可能的實體整併方式。本研究以共計502筆《紅樓夢》印刷文字資料為例，並挑選其中11筆書目作為整併關係的範例。

　　本研究之結論得出，BIBFRAME是以超作品概念來實施實體整併，並透過一組由作者名稱與作品題名所產生之固定詞彙，以雜湊函數方式生成URI，於不同MARC 21欄位附加上該特定URI來鏈結不同關係的書目，讓書目能夠以Hub的形式整合。LC BIBFRAME資料庫實際上能夠透過整併而自動連結的書目關係，包含原著關係、譯本關係、主題關係，以及相關關係，就本研究所探討之《紅樓夢》書目，四種關係皆可以呈現。整併過程之關鍵為一組具有固定格式的作者名稱與作品題名，故在編目方面，相關欄位的著錄方式與使用詞彙變得更需要具備一致性。

　　目前國內對於BIBFRAME書目框架格式的探討較為缺乏，期望未來國內圖書館機構能夠嘗試以中文書目資料實際架設BIBFRAME資料庫，探討中文環境下BIBFRAME 2.0的實際操作情形以及需要改善的部分。

In the 21st century, users are used to using the Internet to obtain information; therefore, librarians must consider how to connect the resources stored in the library with World Wide Web, and present them to users through Internet search engines. However, MARC 21, the machine-readable cataloging format currently used by the library community, cannot achieve that. In order to break the barrier between libraries and World Wide Web, Library of Congress proposes BIBFRAME as a solution to replace MARC 21. The purpose of this study is to explore the process of converting bibliographic records from MARC 21 to BIBFRAME 2.0, using the work of Hong Lou Meng as an example to analyze the process of converting MARC 21 bibliographic records to the BIBFRAME framework, including how to merge entities and how to adjust the MARC fields for converting MARC 21 records to BIBFRAME triples.

　　This study adopts the method of structural analysis and convert the actual bibliographic records. Based on the mapping between the bibliographic entity framework of BIBFRAME 2.0 and the MARC 21 bibliographic record fields of Hong Lou Meng, this study attempts to find out the possible ways of entity consolidation. This study takes a total of 502 printed text materials of Hong Lou Meng as an example, and selects 11 of them as examples of consolidation relationships.

　　The conclusion of this study is that BIBFRAME implements entity consolidation based on the concept of super work, and generates URIs in a hash function through a set of fixed vocabularies generated by author names and work titles, and attaches them to different MARC 21 fields. The bibliographic records with different relationships are linked by specific URI, so that the bibliographic records can be integrated by Hub. The bibliographic relationships that can actually be integrated and automatically linked by LC BIBFRAME database includes original relationship, translation elationship, subject relationship, and related relationships. For the Hong Lou Meng bibliographic records discussed in this stdy, four relationships can be presented. The key to the consolidation process is a set of author names and titles of works with a fixed format. Therefore, in terms of cataloging, the description methods and vocabulary of related fields need to be more consistent.

　　At present, there is still a lack of research on BIBFRAME bibliographic framework in Taiwan. Future research can try to actually build a BIBFRAME database with Chinese bibliographic materials to discuss the actual operation of BIBFRAME 2.0 in the Chinese environment and concrete improvement directions for practice.

一、中文文獻
Antonious, G., & Harmelen, F. v. (2006). 語意網技術導論（初版）。台北市：碁峰資訊。
毛慶禎（2004）。ISBD總則。檢索自http://lins.fju.edu.tw/mao/inforg/isbdg2004.htm
王妙娅、李小梅（2004）。新的元數據標準 MODS 及其應用。情報雜誌。11： 82-83。
朱美華（2018）。關聯數據時代的BIBFRAME 2.0。數字圖書館論壇，3，47-52。doi: 10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2018.03.009
余顯強（1995）。多種機讀格式並存之編目與檢索架構研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學，台北市。
技術服務小百科（2011）。語意網(Semantic Web)。檢索自http://techserviceslibrary.blogspot.com/2011/04/semantic-web.html
技術服務小百科（2014）。機讀編目格式21 (MARC 21)。檢索自https://techserviceslibrary.blogspot.com/2014/04/21marc21.html
林澤婓（2016）。語意聯合目錄：基於BIBFRAME 2.0的聯合目錄建構。知識管理論壇。1（6）：440-448。
邱子恒（2011）。MARC21概論。檢索自http://catweb.ncl.edu.tw/portal_g13_cnt_page.php?button_num=g13&folder_id=12&cnt_id=43&order_field=&order_type=&search_field=&search_word=&search_field2=&search_word2=&search_field3=&search_word3=&bool1=&bool2=&search_type=1&up_page=1
柯皓仁、陳亞寧（2013）。鏈結資料在圖書館的應用。全國學術電子資訊資源共享聯盟，海量資料：學術研究新境界研討會，臺北市。
徐蕙芬（2014）。從書目框架計畫(BIBFRAME)的發展看書目控制的前景。檢索自http://catweb.ncl.edu.tw/portal_j4_page.php?button_num=j4&cnt_id=9&order_field=&order_type=&search_field=&search_word=&search_field2=&search_word2=&search_field3=&search_word3=&bool1=&bool2=&search_type=1&up_page=1
徐蕙芬、戴怡正（2013）。MARC 21書目紀錄中文手冊：圖書、連續性出版品。臺北市：國家圖書館。
國家圖書館（2018）。國家圖書館107年7月1日起中文編目採用RDA。檢索自http://catapp.ncl.edu.tw/rda/post/id/1150/
國家圖書館NBINet合作編目推動小組（2008）。NBINet各類型核心書目紀錄 -- MARC 21 欄位總覽。在NBINet合作編目書目資料處理原則第二版（頁87-120）。檢索自http://nbinet.ncl.edu.tw/FileUpload/Fckeditor/file/%E5%90%88%E4%BD%9C%E7%B7%A8%E7%9B%AE%E6%9B%B8%E7%9B%AE%E8%99%95%E7%90%86%E5%8E%9F%E5%89%872008/ch4_all.pdf
張慧銖（2011）。圖書館電子資源組織：從書架到網路。臺北市：華藝數位。
許靜芬（2017）。從BIBFRAME發展探討國內編目環境移轉之因應。國家圖書館自行研究計畫成果報告。（編號﹕無），未出版。
陳和琴（2003）。書目紀錄功能需求(FRBR)初探。在淡江大學資訊與圖書館學學系編著，2003年資訊科技與圖書館學術研討會論文集（頁179-200）。台北市：淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系所。檢索自http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/retrieve/111203/%E6%9B%B8%E7%9B%AE%E8%A8%98%E9%8C%84%E5%8A%9F%E8%83%BD%E9%9C%80%E6%B1%82%28FRBR%29%E5%88%9D%E6%8E%A2.pdf
黃居仁（2003）。語意網、詞網與知識本體：淺談未來網路上的知識運籌，佛教圖書館館訊。33：6-21。
圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典（1995）。分析款目Analytical Entry。檢索自https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1683168/?index=1
圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典（2012）。書目紀錄功能需求Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)。檢索自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679241/
圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典（2012）。語意網semantic web。檢索自https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679015/?index=2
鄭玉玲、牛惠曼、許令華（2010）。中國機讀編目格式與MARC 21欄位對照研析：以變長欄為例。國家圖書館館刊，99(2)，99-128。
賴琮瑋（2009）。利用GoogleMap應用在維基百科之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。

二、英文文獻
Berners-Lee, T. (2006). Design issues of Linked Data. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.
Bigelow, I. (2019, September). Opus Ex Machina: Modelling superWork, work, and instance entities in Bibframe, presented at the Bibframe Workshop in Europe 2019, Hamburg. Retrieved from https://www.kb.se/download/18.d0e4d5b16cd18f600eacb/1569309579935/Opus%20Ex%20Machina%20-%20Present.pdf
Chen, P. (1976), The Entity-Relationship Model: Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1), 9-36.
Ford, K. (2019, September). Concerning Identities: For Things, but not the easy Things [Contains Hubs Part I]. Presented at the Bibframe Workshop in Europe 2019, Stockholm. Retrieved from https://www.kb.se/download/18.d0e4d5b16cd18f600eaea/1569322333140/2019-kefo-identity.pdf
Ford, K. (2019, September). Concerning Relationships: Hubs Part II. Presented at the Bibframe Workshop in Europe 2019, Stockholm. Retrieved from https://www.kb.se/download/18.d0e4d5b16cd18f600eafb/1569324367132/2019-kefo-relationships.pdf
Heath, T., & Bizer, C. (2011) Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space (1st edition). Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web: Theory and Technology, 1:1, 1-136. Morgan & Claypool.
Hjelm, J. (2001). Creating the Semantic Web with RDF: Professional Developer's Guide. New York: Weley.
Jin, Q., Hahn, J., & Croll, G. (2016). BIBFRAME Transformation for Enhanced Discovery. Library Resources & Technical Services, 60(4), 223-235. doi: 10.5860/lrts.60n4.223.
Koivunen, M. R., & Miller, E. (2001). W3C Semantic Web Activity. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/2001/12/semweb-fin/w3csw
Kroeger, A., J. (2013). The Road to BIBFRAME: The Evolution of the Idea of Bibliographic Transition into a Post-MARC Future. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(8), 873-890. doi: 10.1080/01639374.2013.823584.
Library of Congress (2012). Bibliographic Framework as a Web of Data: Linked Data Model and Supporting Services. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/pdf/marcld-report-11-21-2012.pdf.
Library of Congress (2016). BIBFRAME Pilot (Phase One—Sept. 8, 2015—March 31, 2016): Report and Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/pdf/bibframe-pilot-phase1-analysis.pdf.
Library of Congress (2017). BIBFRAME 2 List View. Retrieve from http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe.html
Library of Congress (2017). Introduction of events. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/pdf/bf2-eventmodel-march2017.pdf
Library of Congress (2018). Creating and Updating a BIBFRAME database. presented at the ALA Annual, New Orleans. Retrieve from https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/news/pdf/bibframe-update-alaal2018.pdf
Library of Congress (2019). MARC 21 to BIBFRAME 2.0 Conversion Specifications. Retrieve from https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/mtbf/
Library of Congress (2020). BIBFRAME Events. Retrieve from https://www.loc.gov/librarians/american-library-association/midwinter/bibframe-events/
Library of Congress (2020). New BIBFRAME-to-MARC Conversion Tools. Retrieve from https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/news/bibframe-to-marc-conversion.html
McCallum, S. (2017). BIBFRAME Development. JLIS.it, 8(3), 71-85. doi: 10.4403/jlis.it-12415.
McCallum, S. (2019, June). Library of Congress BIBFRAME File Access and Pilot. Presented at the BIBFRAME Update Forum at the ALA Annual Conference 2019, Washington. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/news/source/alaan2019-bibframeupdate-mccallum.pptx
Michael, B., & Han, M. J. K. (2019). Assessing BIBFRAME 2.0: Exploratory implementation in metadata maker. Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 26-31.
Schreur, P. (2018, August). The Evolution of BIBFRAME: from MARC Surrogate to Web Conformant Data Model. Paper presented at: IFLA WLIC 2018 – Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia – Transform Libraries, Transform Societies in Session 141 - Cataloguing. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/2202/1/141-schreur-en.pdf
Sha, V. T. (1995). Cataloging internet resources: The library approach. The Electronic Library, 13(5), 467-476.
Stephens, O. (2015). Introduction to MarcEdit . Retrieved from https://archive.cilip.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/intro_to_marcedit.pdf
Taniguchi, S. (2017). Examining BIBFRAME 2.0 from the Viewpoint of RDA Metadata Schema. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55(6), 387-412. doi: 10.1080/01639374.2017.1322161.
Taniguchi, S. (2018). Is BIBFRAME 2.0 a Suitable Schema for Exchanging and Sharing Diverse Descriptive Metadata about Bibliographic Resources?, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 56(1), 40-61, doi: 10.1080/01639374.2017.1382643
Taniguchi, S. (2018). Mapping and Merging of IFLA Library Reference Model and BIBFRAME 2.0. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 56, 427-454, doi: 10.1080/01639374.2018.1501457
Tennant, R. (2002). MARC Must Die. Library Journal, 127(17), 26-28.
Trail, N. (2017, November). Building a BIBFRAME Catalog, presented at the SWIB conference, Hamburg. Retrieved from https://swib.org/swib17/slides/trail_bibframe.pdf
W3C (2014). RDF 1.1 Turtle. Retrieve from https://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/
Xu, A., Hess, K., & Akerman, L. (2017). From MARC to BIBFRAME 2.0: Crosswalks. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 56(2-3), 224-250. doi: 10.1080/01639374.2017.1388326.
Xu, A., Singh, A., Ramamurthy, A., Xu, C., Abdelraouf, M. M., & Ding, Y. (2016). Initial BIBFRAME 2.0 Modeling for the Library Information Spotlight “Opera Planet”, Journal of Library Metadata, 16(3-4), 202-227. doi: 10.1080/19386389.2016.1258910
Zapounidou, S., Sfakakis, M., & Papatheodorou, C. (2017). Representing and integrating bibliographic information into the Semantic Web: A comparison of four conceptual models. Journal of Information Science, 43(4), 525-553. doi:10.1177/0165551516650410.
Zapounidou, S., Sfakakis, M., & Papatheodorou, C. (2017, September). Preserving Bibliographic Relationships in Mappings from FRBR to BIBFRAME 2.0. Paper session presented at the 21st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, Greece. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Preserving-Bibliographic-Relationships-in-Mappings-Zapounidou-Sfakakis/07cc0d95695645a9500152025bd62b9fb7dcbd7c