研究生: |
魏毓文 Yu-wen Wei |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
《愛德華三世》之宗教、性別及主體的順承議題 A Contextual Study: The Religious, Gender, and Identity Politics of Obedience in Edward III |
指導教授: |
林璄南
Lin, Ying-Nan |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
英語學系 Department of English |
論文出版年: | 2004 |
畢業學年度: | 92 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 110 |
中文關鍵詞: | 愛德華三世 、莎士比亞歷史劇 、宗教改革 、前現代時期女性 |
英文關鍵詞: | Edward III, Shakespearean history, Reformation, Early modern women |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:184 下載:6 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘要
本篇論文在文化物質理論的架構下,探討新納入莎士比亞經典之歷史劇,《愛德華三世》之宗教、性別及主體的順承議題。第一章探討十六世紀新教婚姻意識形態對前現代時期女性社會地位的影響,父系作家如何挪用聖經來矮化女性心理、智識及道德層次,並藉此合法化父系社會中女性次等的社會與政治地位。第二章探討女性於三部前現代時期戲劇中之再現形象: 密德頓與羅立之《偷天換日》、瑋伯斯特之《馬爾菲女公爵》以及喬治皮爾之《大衛王與別示巴》。第三章探討《愛德華三世》之宗教、性別、及主體的順承議題。本論文質疑當前文獻過分悲觀地主張女性主體在前現代時期歷史劇中總是被省略、禁聲、或妖魔化,並提出女性在《愛德華三世》之歷史國族建構中,扮演舉足輕重腳色的新看法。《愛德華三世》文本中所浮現的強烈女性主體意識與聲音,以及以個人良知為行事最終準繩的文化現象,在在展現前現代時期的民主化和現代化里程。
Abstract
In this thesis, I investigate the religious, gender, and identity politics of obedience as manifested in the recently attributed Shakespearean play, Edward III, within a cultural materialist framework. In chapter one, I begin my project by examining the impacts of the Protestant marital ideology on the social status of women and the ways in which patriarchal writers appropriate the Bible to construct women as psychologically, intellectually, and morally inferior, thereby justifying the social and political subordination of early modern women. In chapter two, I turn to investigate how females were represented on the early modern stage by examining Thomas Middleton and William Rowley’s The Changeling (1653), John Wesbter’s The Duchess of Malfi (1623), and George Peele’s The Love of King David and Fair Bethsabe (1599). This chapter focuses on the ways in which dramatists engaged with the contemporary querrelles des femmes through the representation of a number of strong women that challenge patriarchal society with varying degree of success. Finally, in my third chapter, I situate Edward III in the context of the Reformation movement and delineate the ways in which the play participates and intervenes in the religious, gender and identity politics of obedience in early modern English culture. I interrogate the pessimistic idea in current critical literature that a strong female presence in history plays is always demonized, victimized, or marginalized. I contend that the English nation-building project is impossible without the presence of a strong and virtuous female that helps to shape and direct the course of history in Edward III.
Works Cited
Aughterson, Kate, ed. Renaissance Woman: A Sourcebook: Constructions of Femininity in England. London and New York: Routledge, 1995.
Behling, Laura L. “‘S/he Scandles our Proceedings’: The Anxiety of Alternative Sexualities in The White Devil and The Duchess of Malfi.” English Language Notes 33.4 (1996): 24-43.
Brathwait, Richard. The English Gentlewoman. Instruction of a Christen Woman. Conduct Literature for Women 1500-1640. vol. 6. Ed. William St. Clair and Irmgard Maasen. London: Pickering and Chato, 2000.
Champion, Larry S. “‘Answere to this Perillous Time’: Ideological Ambivalence in The Raigne of King Edward III and the English Chronicle Plays.” English Studies 2 (1988):117-129.
Comensoli, Viviana and Anne Russell, ed. Enacting Gender on the English Renaissance Stage. Urbana and Chicago: U of Illinois P, 1999.
Desmet, Christy. “‘Neither Maid, Widow, nor Wife’: Rhetoric of the Woman Controversy in Measure for Measure and The Duchess of Malfi.” In Another Country:Feminist Perspectives on Renaissance Drama. Ed. Dorothea Kehler and Susan Baker. London: Scarecrow P, 1991.
Dod, John and Robert Cleaver. A Godlie Forme of Household Government. Instruction of a Christen Woman. Conduct Literature for Women 1500-1640. vol. 3. Ed. William St. Clair and Irmgard Maasen. London: Pickering and Chato, 2000.
Engelberg, Edward. “Tragic Blindness in The Changeling and Women Beware Women.”
Erickson, Peter. “On the Origins of American Feminist Shakespeare Criticism.” Women’s Studies 26 (1997): 1-26.
Godshalk, W. L. “Dating Edward III.” Notes and Queries 42.3 (1995): 299-300.
Goodman, Christopher. How Superior Powers Oght to be Obeyed. 1558. New York: Columbia UP, 1931.
Gouge, William. Of Domesticall Duties. Conduct Literature for Women 1500-1640. vol. 5. Ed. William St. Clair and Irmgard Maasen. London: Pickering and Chato, 2000.
Green, John Richard. A Short History of the English People. Vol. 1. London: Macmillan, 1952.
Haber, Judith. “ ‘I(t) Could not choose but follow’: Erotic Logic in The Changeling.” Representations 81 (2003): 79-98.
Hopkins, Lisa. “The Part with Ne’er a Bone In’t: Webster’s Women and the Politics of Speech.” Journal of Gender Studies 4.2 (1995): 77-85.
Howard, Jean E. and Phyllis Rackin. Engendering a Nation: A Feminist Account of Shakespeare’s English Histories. London and New York: Routledge, 1997.
Hull, Suzanne W. Chaste, Silent, and Obedient: English Books for Women 1475-1640. San Marino: Hutington Library, 1982.
Hunter, G. K. “Shakespeare and the Church.” Shakespeare’s Universe: Renaissance Ideas and Conventions. Ed. John M. Mucciolo. Aldershot, England: Scolar P, 1996. 21-28.
Jankowski, Theodora A. “Defining/Confining the Duchess: Negotiating the Female Body in John Webster’s The Duchess of Malfi.” Studies in Philology 87. 2 (1990): 221-45.
Kastan, David Scott. “Proud Majesty Made a Subject: Shakespeare and the Spectacle of Rule.” Political Shakespeare. Ed. Stephen Orgel and Sean Keilen. New York and London: Garland, 1999.
Kehler, Dorothea and Susan Baker, ed. Introduction. In Another Country:Feminist Perspectives on Renaissance Drama. London: Scarecrow P, 1991.
King, N. John. English Reformation Literature: The Tudor Origins of the Protestant Tradition. New Jersey: Princeton UP, 1982.
Lancashire, Ian, ed. An Homilie Against Disobedience and Wilfull Rebellion. December 10,
2003. Short-Title Catalogue 13675. Renaissance Electronic Texts 1.1. University of Toronto. <http://www.library.utoronto.ca/utel/ret/homilies/bk2hom21.html>.
Lord, Joan M. “The Duchess of Malfi: ‘The Spirit of Greatness’ and ‘of Woman.’” Studies in English Literature 16.2 (1976): 305-17.
Low, Anthony. “‘Umpire Conscience’: Freedom, Obedience, and the Cartesian Flight from Calvin in Paradise Lost.” Studies in Philology 96.3 (1999): 348-65.
Lull, Janis. “Plantagenets, Lancastrians, Yorkists, and Tudors:1-3 Henry VI, Richard III, Edward III.” The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s History Plays. Ed. Michael Hattaway. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002.
Matchinske, Megan. “Credible Consorts: What Happens When Shakespeare's Sisters Enter the Syllabus?” Shakespeare Quarterly 47 (1996): 433-50.
---. Writing, Gender and State in Early Modern England: Identity Formation and the Female Subject. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
Melchiori, Giorgio. “Five Falstaffs and the Countess of Salisbury: Edward III as a Garter Play.” Shakespeare’s Garter Plays. Newark: U of Delaware P, 1994.
---, ed. King Edward III. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
Merriam, Thomas. “Edward III.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 15 (2000): 157-86.
---. “Influence Alone? Reflections on the Newly Canonized Edward III.” Notes and Queries 46.2 (1999): 200-06.
---. “Marlowe's Hand in Edward III Revisited.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 11.1 (1996): 19-22.
Molnár, Attila K. “The Construction of the Notion of Religion in Early Modern Europe.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 14 (2002):47-60.
Oakes, Elizabeth. “The Duchess of Malfi as a Tragedy of Identity.” Studies in Philology 96.1 (1999): 51-67.
Peel, George. A Facsimile of The Love of King David and Fair Bethsabe. With the Tragedie of Absalon. As it hath ben divers times plaied on the stage. Printed by Adam Islip. London, 1599.
Rex, Richard. “The Crisis of Obedience: God’s Word and Henry’s Reformation.” The Historical Journal 39.4 (1996):863-894.
Schoenfeldt, Michael. “The gender of religious devotion: Amelia Lanyer and John Donne.”
Religion and Culture in Renaissance England. Ed. Claire Mceachern and Debora Shuger. Cambidge UP: Cambridge. 1997. 209-233.
Shakespeare, William. Henry V. Ed. Katharine Eisaman Maus. The Norton Shakespeare. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt, Walter Cohen, Jean E. Howard, Katharine Eisaman Maus. New York: Norton, 1997.
---. King Edward III. Ed. Giorgio Melchiori. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
---. Measure for Measure. Ed. Katharine Eisaman Maus. The Norton Shakespeare. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt, Walter Cohen, Jean E. Howard, Katharine Eisaman Maus. New York: Norton, 1997.
---. Richard II. Ed. Katharine Eisaman Maus. The Norton Shakespeare. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt, Walter Cohen, Jean E. Howard, Katharine Eisaman Maus. New York: Norton, 1997.
Shapiro, I. A. “The Text of the Raigne of Edward III.” Notes and Queries 50.1 (2003): 35-37.
---. A. “Wedding or Weeding-Knives?” Notes and Queries 50.1 (2003): 35.
Spufford, M. Small Books and Pleasant Histories: Popular Fiction and Its Readership in Seventeenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1981.
Taylor, Dennis. "Introduction: Shakespeare and the Reformation". Religion and Arts. 7.1-2
(2003): 1-9.
Teague, Frances. “ ‘What about Our Hands?’: A Presentational Image Cluster.” Medieval & Renaissance Drama in England 16 (2003): 218-27.
The Bible. King James Version.
Tilney, Edmund. The Flower of Friendship: Ed. Valerie Wayne. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1992.
Vallance, Edward. “Oaths, Casuistry, and Equivocation: Anglican Responses to the Engagement Controversy.” The Historical Journal 44 (2001): 59-77.
Vives, Luis Juan. Instruction of a Christen Woman. Conduct Literature for Women 1500-1640. vol. 1. Ed. William St. Clair and Irmgard Maasen. London: Pickering and Chato, 2000.
Watson, Foster. Vives and the Renaissance Instruction of Women. London: Arnold, 1912.
Wayne, Valerie. ed. The Flower of Friendship: A Renaissance Dialogue Contesting Marriage. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1992.
Webster, John. The Duchess of Malfi. The Works of John Webster. Ed. David Gunby, David Carnegie, Antony Hammond, and Doreen DelVecchio. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995.
Wentersdorf, Karl P. “The Date of Edward III.” Shakespeare Quarterly 16.2 (1965): 227-31.
Westbrook, Vivienne. “Positioning Obedience in Shakespeare’s Henry V.” Sun Yat-sen Journal of Humanities 14 (2002): 67-86.
Whately, William. A Bride-bush. Conduct Literature for Women 1500-1640. vol. 5. Ed. William St. Clair and Irmgard Maasen. London: Pickering and Chato, 2000.
Whitney-Brown, Carolyn. “ ‘A Farre More Worthy Wombe’: Reproductive Anxiety in Peele’s David and Bethsabe.” In Another Country: Feminist Perspectives on Renaissance Drama. Ed. Dorothea Kehler and Susan Baker. London: Scarecrow P, 1991.
Wright, L.B. Middle-Class Culture in Elizabethan England. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1958.