中文摘要
本研究主要以招募12名幼稚園大班幼兒（男生4名，女生8名）與12名安養機構阿嬤共同合作進行為數12次，長達一個半月的代間活動，並採取質性研究的角度出發，和參與觀察的方法，聚焦於十二組老少配中的其中5組，瞭解他們在代間方案的活動歷程中，幼兒對老人的看法與態度、幼兒與老人雙方代間關係的發展情形以及代間的互動方式。此外，輔以訪談相關人員（如：幼稚園教師、焦點幼兒之家長、協同研究者等）、研究者札記和畫人測驗（Human Figure Drawings）等，作為資料蒐集的來源。在研究的理論基礎方面，主要包含一些人際關係的相關理論，例如：人際需求論、社會交換論、符號互動論等。還有，兒童發展的觀點與老人學相關的理論，如：角色理論與活動理論等。
本研究分析後發現：1.在幼兒對老人的看法與態度方面─（1）不同幼兒對不同老人的接受度（或態度）因老人對象的不同而有差異。（2）囿於幼兒的口語表達能力與態度看法較偏屬於內在知覺與感受，故較不易全盤掌握、得知。（3）代間接觸互動的品質較直接影響幼兒對老人的態度看法與代間關係。（4）幼兒對熟悉的老人，使用的形容詞彙與描述的內容細節較多而詳細。2.在幼兒與老人雙方代間關係的發展層面─（1）參與本研究之幼兒多數過去曾有與老人互動之經驗且互動品質不錯，故代間活動無法明顯造成代間關係改變。（2）代間經驗互動之好壞，可能形塑整體上幼兒對老人的印象看法。（3）代間關係好壞很難有一個公正客觀之標準。3.在幼兒與老人雙方代間互動方式方面─（1）在活動中，口語上阿嬤們出現較多的「合作式交談」、「表達式交談」與「工具式交談」，而幼兒部分則屬「工具性的交談」為數最多，但這是受活動內容性質影響。（2）阿嬤們較常以身體動作、表情、聲音語調表達她們的情感與感覺，而幼兒主要多以臉部表情、眼神回應阿嬤。（3）代間合作受活動類型影響，亦受到活動參與者之人格特質、個性與做事方式有關。
研究者希冀透過本研究之代間方案中，所看到的代間關係發展及互動、合作情況的展現，能夠引發大家思考代間方案與代間互動及代間關係發展之間的關係為何。

ABSTRACT
The subject of this research was four kindergarten girls, eight kindergarten boys, and twelve female senior adults living in senior homes. The purpose of this research is to examine the interactions between the children and senior adults during a one and half months period. A total of twelve experimental groups were formed. Each group was composed of one senior adult and one child. Only five out of the twelve groups observed were chosen for further documentation.
This research focused on the areas as follows to examine the interactions between two generations.
l Discovering children’s attitude and conception toward the seniors adults.
l Interviewing the participants, such as, the teachers in the kindergarten, the children’s parents, and research assistants, etc.
l Documenting the results of the research.
l Administering a Human Figure Drawing test on the children.
This research was based on the following theories of relationships: interpersonal needs theory, the theory of social exchange, symbolic interactionism. Other related theories regarding child development and geriatrics were also reviewed for the theoretical foundation for this research, for example, role-play theory, and activity theory.
1. Children’s attitudes and opinions toward senior adults.
(1) Children’s attitudes and acceptance of the senior adults were varied from different senior people.
(2) Understanding the oral expressions and attitudes of children were difficult because their actions were based on inward perceptions and emotions.
(3) Children were directly affected by the quality of interaction found in intergenerational contact.
(4) Children were more comfortable and expressive when interacting with their partnering senior adults.
2. The interaction between children and senior adults.
(1) The children who participated in this research had had previous interaction with senior adults and had good experiences with them. Consequently, this might have affected the results of the research in unknown ways. However, they did not have negative effect to intergenerational relationship, maintaining a stable condition.
(2) An intergenerational relationship, whether positive or negative, would directly affect the opinions of children regarding senior adults.
(3) There was no true and objective standard for judging intergenerational relationships.
3. The oral interactions between children and senior adults.
  (1) In this activity, senior adults prefer to use “cooperative talk”, “expressional talk ” and “ instrumental talk”; for children ,they rather used functional talk, but that would be affect by the properties of activities.
(2) Senior adults often used body movements, expressions and vocal tones to demonstrate their emotions and feelings. Children responded with facial expression and expression in their eyes to senior adults.
(3) The interaction between the two generations were not only determined by the type of the activities, but also determined by the personal style and unique characteristics of the participants.
Through the intergeneration activities, this research had revealed the development, interactions, and cooperation between two generations. The researcher anticipates that the results can be a foundation for the further research. More effective activities can, therefore, be generated to enhance more positive interactions and the harmonious relationship between two generations.

參 考 書 目
一、中文部分
王家誠（1975）。了解兒童畫。台北：藝術圖書公司。
王德育譯(1995)。創造與心智之成長。長沙市：湖南美術出版社。
王玉、梁波譯(1996)。兒童塗鴉．線畫．彩畫。台北：世界文物出版社。
尹少淳編(1995)。美術，另一種學習語言。長沙市：湖南美術。
中正大學教育研究所主編（2000）。質的研究方法。高雄市：麗文文化。
全人豪（1976）。對省嘉師專女生在林森國小舉行畫人測驗之預見。嘉義師專學報，7，234-253。
李叡明、陳武鎮譯(1996)。兒童藝術家《兒童的繪畫與圖案製作》。台北：世界文物出版社。
吳毓瑩（1999）。畫人測驗對於行為/情緒困擾兒童區辨功能之探討。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，46（1），17-34。
谷瑞勉譯（1999）。鷹架兒童的學習：維高斯基與幼兒教育。台北市：心理。
李宜靜(2000)。兩個小畫家─小律和小媃圖畫背後的故事。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
李奉儒、高淑清等譯（2001）。質性教育研究—理論與方法。嘉義市：濤石文 化。
吳昭容（1992）。畫人測驗與兒童性格之衡鑑。國民教育，32（11/12），18-29。
吳姿儀、廖梅花譯（2001）。質性研究入門—紮根理論研究方法。嘉義市：濤石文化。
吳武烈譯（2003）。兒童藝術治療----繪畫：兒童的心靈之窗。台北市：五南。
林淑慎（1972）。瑞士彩色推理測驗及畫人測驗與學業成績之相關。輔導月刊，8（1），6-7。
和廷呂譯(1975)。透過藝術的教育。台北：雄獅。
林美珍(1987)。兒童對老人態度之研究。教育與心理研究，10，85-104。
林美珍(1993)。大學生對老人態度之研究。教育與心理研究，16，349-384。
林曼麗(2000)。台灣視覺藝術教育研究。台北：雄獅。
周家華（2000）。老人學研究---理論與實務。台北市：正中。
周怜利譯（2000）。Erikson老年研究報告：人生八大階段。台北市：張老師。
林重新編(2001)。心理與教育測驗。台北市：揚智文化。
林家興、陳孟吟（2001）。性虐待兒童在畫人測驗之分析研究。教育心理學報，32（2），1-18。
林歐貴英、郭鐘隆譯（2003）。社會老人學。台北市：五南。
洪淑媚(1998)。大學生對老人態度之研究。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳智昌（1983）。我國學生對老人的態度和行為意向調查研究。國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳輝東(1990)。幼兒畫指導手冊。台北：藝術家。
夏勳(1990)。兒童美術之開拓。台北：世界文物。
陳淑敏（1995）。Vygotsky「最近發展區」概念內涵的探討。屏東師院學報，8，503-526。
陳淑敏（1998）。從社會互動看皮亞傑與維高斯基的理論及其對幼教之啟示。幼教天地，15，167-183。
徐光國（1996），社會心理學。台北：五南。
高敬文（1996）。質化研究方法論。台北市：師大書苑。
陳怡全譯（1997）。蒙特梭利教學的新視野。台北市：及幼文化。
陳向明（1996）。王小剛為什麼不上學了—一位輟學生的個案調查。教育研究與實驗，1，35-45。
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。台北市：五南。
張春興（1983）。心理學。台北市：東華書局。
張春興（1989）。張氏心理學辭典。台北市：桂冠。
張春興（1996）。現代心理學。台北：東華書局。
張惠卿譯（1989）。人際關係新法則。台北市 :聯經。
張勝成、林惠芬和陳尚霖（1994）。聽覺障礙兒童畫人測驗之修訂報告。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，41，191-206。
張明麗(1999)。花蓮地區幼兒對老人態度之研究。花蓮師院學報，9，121-137。
陸莉（1982）。谷賀畫人測驗修訂研究報告提要。台北師專學報，9，27-67。
陸雅青（1997）。兒童藝術治療。台北市：五南。
陸雅青（1999）。藝術治療----繪畫詮釋：從美術進入孩子的心靈。台北市：心理。
陸雅青（2000）。藝術治療團體實務研究：以破碎家庭兒童為例。台北市：五南。
黃瑞琴（1991）。質的教育研究方法。台北市：心理。
黃安邦譯（1992）。社會心理學。台北：五南。
黃津文（2002）。幼兒與老人代間課程之研究。國立台灣師範大學家
政教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
彭駕騂（1999）。老人學。台北市：揚智文化。
董淑鈴（2000）。畫人測驗及語句完成測驗分析示例。國教輔導，39（3），31-36。
趙雲(1983)。兒童繪畫與心智發展。台北：藝術家。
鄭明進(1987)。怎樣瞭解幼兒的畫。台北：世界文物。
蔡金柱、李叡明譯（1993）。兒童畫的心理與教育。台北：世界文物。
蔡敏玲（1994，1月）。教育民族誌中研究者的角色。「社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻」第二次科技研討會：質化研究、次級分析與綜合方法。中央研究院民族學研究所。
蔡敏玲、陳正乾譯（1997）。社會中的心智—高層次心理過程的發展。台北市：心理。
蔡敏玲（2001）。教育質性研究報告的書寫—我在紀實與虛構之間的認真與想像。國立台北師範學院學報，14，233-260。
劉茂英（1979）。普通心理學。台北市：大洋。
潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究理論與應用。台北市：心理。
韓幼賢（1969）。畫人測驗與性格關係之研究。心理與教育，3，69-88。
蘇建文、林美珍、程小危等（1998）。發展心理學。台北市：心理。
蘇美鳳(2003)。國中生對老人的態度及其對教學活動之啟示─以大台北地區國中生為例。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。

二、西文部份
Aday, R. H., McDuffie, W., & Sims C.R. (1993). Impact of an international program on black adolescent’s attitudes toward the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 19 (7), 663-673.
Aday, R., Sims, C., McDuffie, W., & Evans, E. (1996), Changing children’s attitudes toward the elderly: the longitudinal effect of an intergenerational partners program. Journal of research in Childhood Education, 10, 143-151.
Aikman, K. G., Belter, R. W., & Finch, A. J. (January,1992). Human Figure Drawings: Validity in assessimg intellectual level and academic achievement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48 (1), 114-120.
Albert, I. & Clark, M. J. (1995, November-December). Aging
Intergenerationally.〔On-line〕Available
http://www.consciouschoice.com/issues/cc086/intergenaging.html
Angelis, J. (1992). The genesis of an intergenerational program. Educational Gerontology, 18(4), 317-327.
Angersbach, H. L., & Jones-Forster, S. (1999). Intergenerational interactions: A descriptive analysis of elder-child interactions in a campus-based child care center. Child & Youth Services, 20, 117-128.
Augiullo, L., Whitbourne, S. K., & Powers, C. (1996). The effects of instruction and experience on college students’ attitude toward the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 22(5), 483-495.
Bales, S. S., Eklund, S. J. & Siffin, C. E. (2000). Children’s perceptions of elderly before and after a school-based intergenerational program. Educational Gerontology, 26(7), 677-689.
Blunk, E., & Williams, S. (1997). The effects of curriculum on preschool children’s perceptions of the elderly.
Boyne, C. (1984). Sex, age and racial differences in elementary children’s perception of elderly adults. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED252300).
Bruce, G. (1990). Aging and the elderly in primary grade reading instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the international reading association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED319015).
Bullock, J. R. & Osborne, S. S. (1999). Seniors’, volunteers’, and families’ perspectives of an intergenerational program in a rural community. Educational Gerontology, 25(3), 237-251.
Burke, J. L. (1981-1982). Young children’s attitudes and perceptions of older adults. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 14, 205-221.
Caspi, A. (1984). Contact hypothesis and inner-age attitudes: A field study of across-age contact. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 47-80.
Chapman, N. J., & Neal, M. B. (1990). The effects of intergenerational experiences on adolescents and older adults. The Gerontologist, 30(6), 825-832.
Cherry, D. A., Benest, F. R., Gates, B., & White, J. (1985). Intergenerational service programs: Meeting shared needs of young and old. The Gerontologist, 25, 126-129.
Couper, D. P., Sheehan, N. W., & Thomas, E. L. (1991). Attitude toward old people: The impact of an intergenerational program. Educational Gerontology, 17, 41-53.
Cox, M.V., Koyasu, M., Hiranuma, H., & Perara, J. (2001). Children’s human figure drawings in the UK and Japan:the effects of age, sex and culture. Britisb Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 275-292.
Dellmann-Jenkins, M. (1997). A senior-centered model of intergenerational programming with young children. Journal of applied Gerontology, 16, 495-506.
Donorfio, L. M. (1991). Using drawings to explore children’s attitudes toward the elderly.Paper presented at the annual Northeastern gerontological society conference. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED334525).
Downs, A. C., & Walz, P. J. (1980). Sex differences in preschoolers’ perceptions of young,middle-aged and elderly adults.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western psychological association (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED201403).
Fillmer, H. T. (1983). Children’s descriptions of and attitudes toward the elderly. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the international reading association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED238775).
Fox, S., & Giles, H.（1993）. Accommodating intergenerational contact:A critique and theoretical model. Journal of Aging Studies, 7(4), 423-451.
Glass, J. C., & Knott, E. S. (1982). Effectiveness of a workshop in aging in changing middle-aged adults attitudes toward the aged. Educational Gerontology, 8, 359-372.
Glass, J. C., & Trent, C. (1980). Changing ninth-graders’ attitudes toward older persons. Research on Aging, 2, 449-512.
Gorelik, Y., Damron-Rodriguez, J., Funderburk, B. & Solomon, D. H. (2000). Undergraduate interest in aging: Is it affected by contact with older adults? Educational Gerontology, 26(7), 623-638.
Griff, M., Lambert, D., Dellmann-Jenkins, M., & Fruit, D. (1996). International activity analysis with three groups of older adults: Frail, community-living, and Alzheimer’s. Educational Gerontology, 22, 601-612.
Handler, L.(1985). The clinical use of the Draw-A-Person Test (DAP). In C. Newmark (Ed.). Major psychological assessment instruments (pp.165-216). Boston : Allyn & Racon.
Harris, D. B. (1963). Children’s drawing as measures of intellectual maturity. Harcourt: Brace & World, Inc.
Haught, P. A., Wall, R. T., Laney, J. D., Leavell, A., & Stuzen S. (1999). Child and adolescent knowledge and attitudes about adults across time and states. Educational Gerontology, 25(6), 501-517.
Henkin, N., & Kingson, E. (1998/99). Keeping the promise: Intergenerational strategies for strengthening the social compact. Generations, 22(4). Special issue.
Hickey, T., Hickey, L. A., & Kalish R.A.(1968). Children’s perceptions of the elderly. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 112, 227-235.
Isaacs, L., & Bearison, D. (1986). The development of children’s prejudice against the aged. International January of Aging and Human Development, 23, 175-194.
Ivester, C., & King, K.(1977). Attitudes of adolescents toward the aged. The Gerontologist,17,85-89.
Jantz, R. K., Seefeldt, C., Galper, A., & Serlock, K. (1977). Children’s attitudes toward the elderly. Social Education, 41, 518-523.
Jantz, R. K., Richard K., et al. (1976). Children’s attitudes toward the elderly(Test Manual). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED181081).
Jantz, R., Seefeldt, C., Galper, A., & Serock, K. (1976). Test manual: the CATE, Children’s Attitudes Toward the Elderly, College Parks, MA: University of Maryland, Center on Aging and the University of Maryland, College of Education.
John, M. T. (1977). Teaching children about older family members. Social Education, 41, 524-527.
Johnston, J. M. (1985). Intergenerational Experiences and Programs: Benefits and Considerations for Young Children, Older Adults and Program Administrators.
Klausemeier, H. J., & Ripple, R. (1971). Learning and Human Abilities.New York: Harper & Row.
Knapp, J. L., & Stubblefield, P. (2000). Changing students’perceptions of aging: The impact of an intergenerational service learning course. Educational Gerontology,26(7), 611-621.
Knox, V. J., Gekoski, W. L., & Johnson, E. A. (1986). Contact with and perceptions of the elderly. The Gerontologist, 26, 309-313.
Kocarnik, R., & Ponzetti, J. (1986). The influence of intergenerational contact on child care participants’ attitudes toward the elderly. Child Care Quartely, 15, 244-250.
Kocarnik, R. A., & Ponzetti, J. J. (1991). The advantages and challenges of intergenerational programs in long term care facilities. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 16(1/2), 97-107.
Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological Evaluation of Children’s Human Figure Drawings. New York London : Grune & Stratton, Inc.
Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Evaluation of Children’s Human Figure Drawing. New York: Grune & Stratton, Inc. La Porte, & Angela, M. 1999). Building community through intergenerational art education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED439079).　
La Porte, & Angela, M. (1999). Building community through intergenerational art education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED439079).
Lancy, J. D., & Wimsatt, T. J. (1999). Children’s ideas about aging before an integrated unit of instruction. Educational Gerontology, 25(6), 531-548.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in Psychology. In J. V. Wertsch(Ed.) , The concept of activity in Soviet Psychology. White Plains, N.Y.: Sharpe.
LinOu G. (1999). Linkages between elders and kindergarten aged children-An observational study. Colorado: University of Northern Colorado, Early Childhood Graduate School.
LinOu G. (2000, April). Fun is ageless. Paper presented at the meeting of Spring Conference of the Colorado Association for the Education of Young Children, Denver, CO.
Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. L. (1987). Creative and mental growth. New York:Macmillan.
Lubin, B., Larsen, R. M., & Matarazzo, J. D. (1984). Patterns of psychological test usage in the United States: 1935-1982. American Psychologist, 39(4), 451-454.
Lubin, B., Wallus, R., & Paine, C. (1971). Patterns of psychological test usage in the United States: 1935-1969. Professional Machover, K. (1949). Personality Projection: In the Drawing of the Human Figure. Spingfield: Charles C Thomas.
Mack, C. & Wilson, J. O. (1990). Share it with the children.(Rev. ed.). U.S.: Pittsburgh, PA.
Maddox, G. L., & Compbell, R. T. (1985). Scope,Concepts,and Methods in the Study of Aging. In R.H.Binstock and E. Shanas.(Eds). Handbook of Aging and the Social Science 2nd ed. NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Marc,B., & Gary, S. (1981). School-based programs for facilitating positive attitudes toward the elderly. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the New England educational research organization. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED206557).
Marion, R. (1983). New attitudes toward the aging: A role for adult education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED235298).
Matthew, K., Shih-Tsen, L., & Rama, R. (2003, August). Intergenerational Programming in Extension: Needs Assessment as Planning Tool. Journal of Extension, 41(4). [On-line].Available: http://www.joe.org/joe/2003august/a5.shtml.
McGuire, S. L. (1986). Promoting positive attitudes toward aging among children. Journal of Social health, 56, 322-324.
McGuire, S. L. (1993). Promoting positive attitudes through aging education: A study with preschool children. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 13, 3-11.
Middle, M., & Gross, D. (2002). Intergenerational day care and preschoolers’ attitudes about aging. Educational Gerontology, 28, 271-288.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis(2nd ed.). New York: Sage.
Miller, R. S. et al. (1983). Children’s perceptions of the elderly. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the southwestern. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED229171).
Mitchell, J., Wilson, K. Revicki, D., & Parker, L. (1985). Children’s perception of aging: A multidimensional approach to differences by age, sex, and race. The Gerontologist, 25, 182-187.
Murphy-Russell, S., Die, A. H., & Walker, J. L. (1986). Changing attitudes toward the elderly: The Impact of three methods of attitude change. Educational Gerontology, 12, 241-252.
Mussen, P. H., Conger, J. J., & Kagan, J. (1969). Child Development and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.
Newman, S. (1997). History and evolution of intergenerational programs. In S. Newman, C. R. Ward, T. B. Smith, J. O. Wilson, & J. M. McCrea(Eds.). Intergenerational programs: Past, present, and future. (pp.55-79). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis
Newman, S., & Brummel, S. W. (1989). Intergenerational program: imperatives, strategies, impacts, trends. New York: Haworth Press.
Newman, S., & Smith, T. B. (1997). Developmental theories as the basis for intergenerational programs. In N. S. Ward, C. R. Smith, T. B. Wilson, J. O. McCrea, J. M. Calhoun, G. & Kingson, E.(Eds.). Intergenerational programs: Past, present, and future. Washington,DC: Taylor & Francis.
Newman, S., Ward, C. R., Smith, T. B. et al. (1978). Intergenerational programs---past, present, and future. Washington: Taylor & Francis.
Newman, S., & Ward, C. (1992-1993). An observational study of intergenerational activities and behavior change in demanding elders at adult day care centers. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 36, 321-333.
Ogdon, D. P. (2001). Psychodiagnostics & personality assessment handbook, 3 rd edition. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Palmore, E. B. (1970). The Effects of Aging on Activity and Attitude. In E. Palmore. (Ed). Normal Aging. Durham, NC: Duke Univ Pr.
Pinquart, M. et al.（2000）. Changes in attitudes among children and elderly adults in intergenerational group work. Educational Gerontology, 26, 523-540.
Rae, G., & Hyland, P. (2001). Generalisability and classical test theory analyses of Koppitz’s scoring system for human figure drawings. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 369-382.
Ralston, P. A. (1985). Secondary students’ knowledge of, attitudes toward, and experiences with older adults. Final Report. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED271711).
Robbert, L. (1981). Bringing preschoolers and the institutionalized elderly together: How one program works. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED212374).
Scott, L. H. (1981). Measuring intelligence with the Godenough-Harris drawing test. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 483-505.
Scribner, C. M., & Handler, L. (1987). The interpreter’s personality in Draw-A-Person interpretation: A study of interpersonal style. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51(1), 112-121.
Seefeldt, C. (1989). Intergenerational programs: impact on attitudes. Journal of children in contemporary society, 20, 185-194.
Seefeldt, C. (1998). Play between generations: Grandparents and children. In D. P. Frornberg & D. Bergen(Eds.). Play from birth to twelve and beyond: contexts, perspectives, and meanings. (pp.290-302). New York: Garland.
Seefeldt, C. (1987). The effects of preschoolers’ visits to a nursing home. The Gerontologist, 27(2), 228-232.
Seefeldt, C., & Keawkungwal, S. (1985). Children’s attitudes toward the elderly in Thailand and the United States. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, XXVI(3-4), 226-231.
Seefeldt, C., & Ahn U. R. (1990). Children’s attitudes toward the elderly in Korea and the United States. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 31, 248 - 256.
Seefeldt, C., Jantz, R., Galper, A., & Serock, K. (1977). Children’s attitudes toward the elderly: Educational implications. Educational Gerontology, 2, 301-310.
Seefeldt, C., Jants, R., Serock, K., & Bredekamp, S. (1982). Elderly persons’ attitudes toward children. Educational Gerontology, 8, 493-506.
Short-DeGraff, M., & Diamond, K. (1996). Intergenerational program effects on social responses of elderly adult day care members, Educational Gerontology, 22, 467-482.
Silvern, S. (1986). old and young together: Effect of an educational program in perschoolers’attitudes toward older people. Childhood Education, 62 (Jan/Feb), 206-212.
Storey, D. C. (1977). Gray power:an endangered species? Ageism as in children’s book. Social Education, 41, 528-533.
Sundberg, N. (1961). The practice of psychological testing in clinical service on the United States. American Psychologist, 16, 79-88.
Trent, C., & Glass, J. C., & Crockett, J. (1977). Changing adolescent 4-H Club members’ attitudes toward the aged. Educational Gerontology, 4, 33-48.
Triandis, H. C. (1971). Attitude and Attitude change. New York: Wiley.
Vedder,P., Katrien Van De Vijfeijken, & Kook, H. (2000). Borrowing norms for the human figure drawing test: How to validate this practice? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(4), 393-404.
Walker A. (1996). The new generational contract : intergenerational relations,old age,and welfare.London;Bristol,Pa.: UCL Press.
War, C., Los Kamp, L., & Newman, S. (1996). The effects of participation in an intergenerational program on the behavior of residents with dementia. Activities, Adaption, and Aging, 20, 61-76.
Ward, C. (1997b). Research on intergenerational programs. In S. Newman, C. R. Ward, T. B. Smith, J. O. Wilson, & J. M. McCrea(Eds). Intergenerational programs: past, present, and future (pp.127-139). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.