本文之研究目的為建構「人際因應轉變諮商模式」的「案主改變歷程理念模式」。　
研究之初, 先根據前導性研究結果, 提出對於案主在此諮商中的改變歷程之假設, 即包括
十二要件在內的初始理念模式。而後進行三階段的比對分析, 以便對理念模式作出擴充與
確認的工作。 第一階段比對為取四個達到人際因應形式轉變之成功個案, 以初始理念
模式為框架, 對其表現進行編碼歸類, 以其相合之處確認理念模式, 並對理念模式無法函
蓋之案主表現進行分析, 在其中發現新的要件, 而擴充原理念模式。第二階段為取三個未
成功個案與前述四個成功個案, 以擴充後之理念模式為框架進行比對, 以成功個案擁有而
未成功個案缺失之要件流程圖, 對理念模式作出確認。第三階段比對為另取三個成功個案
,以修正後的理念模式為框架, 進行比對, 並於局部細節進行精密化之修正。在此比對過
程中逐漸建構出案主的人際因應轉變歷程模式。 經此三階段比對之後, 建構之模式包
含有十九個要件。某些要件經常相連出現, 而形成要件叢集。 案主由目前困擾的起點
行為開始展開叢集Ⅰ的歷程, 就是在目前困擾的人際互動與原生家庭的人際互動中, 察覺
到自身重覆性出現的因應形式。至此, 流程分為兩條路徑, 其中一條為在察覺因應形式時
, 觸動內心痛苦的經驗以及壓抑的需求, 而由此進入叢集Ⅱ之自我疼惜的片段。另一路徑
為在因應形式察覺後, 對之作出得失評估, 而由此走向叢集Ⅲ之因應轉變之片段。叢集Ⅱ
之結果, 自我疼惜產生時, 案主或是直接產生因應轉變, 或是重返叢集Ⅰ, 再作現況與因
應之探討。 成功案主在諮商後期回報在生活中已有行為改變之結果。未成功個案則無
此種回報, 而在流程上呈現殘缺的現象, 其殘缺的要件分怖在最後階段的要件流程上, 可
以見出在本研究的理念模式上可以辨識出成功與未成功個案之改便歷程。 最後, 研究
者繪製「人際因應轉變諮商模式」之要件流程圖, 並根據研究結果提出建議, 以作為諮商
實務工作者及未來研究之參考。

The purpose of this study is to construct a rational model for the "Inter
personal Coping Transformation Counseling".At the beginning of the research,a
hypothetical changing process of clients' performance was pre-sented,which was
the rational model with 12 components. It was then follow-ed up with a three-
stages analysis and comparison to facilitate the con-firmation of the rational
model. For the first stage of analysis,four successful cases was taken ,an
dusing the rational model as a framework,to encode their performance .Using th
e part of clients' performance that match the rationalmodel to con-firm it. An
alysis was then carried out on the part of clients' performancethat did not co
nform to the rational model. New components were discovered in these cases to
expand the original rational model. In the second stage ,three unsuccessful ca
ses ;and the four successful cases mentioned above werecompared with each othe
r,using the expended rational model as the framework.The components and flow o
f those components present in the four successful cases and those lacking in t
he three successful cases were used to confirm the rational model.In the third
stage,three new successful cases were mapped against the adjusted rational mo
del framework ,and the rational model was refined in some area. A model of
19 components in clients'changing process was constructed asthe result of this
study. Some components often appear together forming com-ponents clusters.
The statement of current interpersonal problems was the beginning of theclust
er I,and the awareness of coping pattern that repeated to occur through-out hi
s or her current relationship and the original family experience was theresult
of the cluster.Then the flow was divided into two paths , one of whichled the
clients to re-experience the pain feeling and needs for repression. This led
to an episode of self compassion,that is the result of clusterii;The other pat
h was that after discovering a coping pattern,the clients evaluatedthe gain an
d loss of it,which led to cluster III; the episode of coping transfor-mation.
Along with the appearance of self compassion, a result of cluster II,The clien
ts might produce the coping transformation direcly , or return to clusterI aga
in. During the latter part of counseling , the patient in the successful se
ssionsreported that their behavior were changed in really life. In the unsucce
ssful cases,deficiencies in flow were distributed in the final episode of the
flow. It is evident that the components of the final section make the differen
css of"Interpersonal Coping Transformation Counseling" flow chart and offered
sresearchers key words: model construction, coping transformation, task a
nalysis.