設計成為博物館的主題，在20世紀接近尾聲的時候崛起，併著當代創意產業的發展從西方到東方持續蔓延與茁壯。「設計」在實務上一向是商業體系中的一環，在文化理論上也常與消費多有關連。一個經濟價值含量高的領域在博物館機構運作中要如何被轉化成為文化發展的力量，是一個有趣的探討主題。

本研究藉由花建與David Throsby對同心圓理論模式的理解與特徵：1.其核心層皆強調原創性這個特質，2.圈層的解釋方式帶有上下游價值鏈的概念，重視上下游的互動與回饋等，以此應用於設計博物館功能運作價值鏈的探討；再加上John Holden所提出的文化價值概念：文化傳承(culture experience)、文化實踐(culture practice)、文化認同(culture identity)等文化價值三面向，綜整進行設計博物館功能運作與文化價值理論的交叉探討。以質化研究中的個案研究為方法，從本研究所蒐集到的四十多個設計博物館中進行分類探討，從分類探討中定義出五種設計博物館類型，有「設計綜合型｣、「設計文化型｣、「設計專業型｣、「設計企業型｣、「設計個人型｣等。然為因應研究時程與訪談實際操作，統整為「設計複合型｣與「設計主題型｣兩大類，並從中選出共八個個案進行實地訪視與訪談，以研究設計博物館於1.收藏/研究、2.展覽/推廣、3.教育/創新、4.商業化加值、5.與在地互動等面向的文化價值取向。

經研究訪談的歸納整理後，本研究提出新的文化價值模型理論，採取兩段式的論述方式，第一段以雷達圖表現個案博物館對應1.收藏/研究、2.展覽/推廣、3.教育/創新、4.商業化加值、5.與在地互動等面向，作為評量博物館功能價值鏈的表現依據；第二段論述採用直角坐標系的象限圖來呈現個案博物館於文化價值及與在地互動間的表現，得出四個象限的結果，高文化價值+高在地互動(象限一)、低文化價值+高在地互動(象限二)、低文化價值+低在地互動(象限三)、高文化價值+低在地互動(象限四)。從個案設計博物館象限圖進一步分析八個個案館所可得出設計博物館文化價值三大特徵類型，「文化價值在地化｣、「文化價值全球化｣及「文化價值品牌化｣，因此新的模型可針對個案博物館的不同發展面向呈現出具有動態特質且不同的形態表現。

此外，研究結果亦總結設計博物館的文化價值易彰顯於典藏與展覽；但多數個案博物館與在地設計資源的互動性低；設計博物館商店及商業化加值開發面向與文化價值無高度相關性，而且館所不因”設計”主題的商業性質，讓設計博物館於商業化操作上的具有特出差異；建築的創新策略有助於博物館品牌營運策略；設計博物館應發展有特色的策展與展示策略，以區隔其與藝術類或歷史類博物館的差異。

本研究建議若台灣若發展一座設計博物館，可大量透過非正規的教育活動補強正規教育體制中對設計學習的不足，是學生們學習生活美學的重要管道；台灣的設計產業應要借重博物館作為文化推廣單位的優勢，創造出設計產業文化化的價值，彰顯台灣設計的文化話語權。可借鏡「設計主題型」的特色，透過有效的經營管理與商業策略，發展消費文化化與國際化策略；若從台灣現有的美術館或博物館資源來看，應該先落實「文化價值在地化」，創造出言之有物的在地的觀點(包含對應台灣設計於世界設計的位置)與不可取代的特色，再進一步發展「文化價值全球化」為目標。

Design emerged as a museum theme toward the end of the 20th century and flourishes as the contemporary creative industry expands eastward from Western countries. Not only has design long been an integral part of commerce practice-wise, but it is also frequently associated with consumption in cultural theories. That explains why transforming design, a discipline with a high economic value, into an impetus for cultural development during a museum’s organizational functioning process, is an interesting topic.

The characteristics of the concentric circles model, as perceived by Hua Jian and David Throsby, are: 1. the cores of concentric circles invariably suggest an emphasis on originality; 2. the interpretations of concentric layers are inspired by the notion of value chain, with a particular focus on interactions/feedback up and down that chain. Based on the two characteristics, this study explored the value chain in design museums’ functioning process, and then integrated the three perspectives of cultural values put forth by John Holden (i.e. culture experience, culture practices and culture identity) for a cross-examination of design museums’ functions and cultural value theories. Employing the case study method, which is a qualitative research approach, this study examined the classification of 40-odd design museums to identify five categories of design museums, defined respectively as “comprehensive design museums”, “general design museums”, “professional design museums”, “corporate design museums” and “individual design museums”, which were then merged into two categories, “composite design museums” and “themed design museums”, due to the research schedule and actual interviewing process. In the case study part of this study, eight museums were selected from the two categories for field surveys/interviews in order to explore the five dimensions of design museums’ cultural value orientations: 1. collection/research; 2. exhibitions/promotion; 3. education/innovation; 4. value-added commercial activities; and 5. interactions with the local community.

Through the analysis of interviews and surveys, this study presents a new theoretical model of cultural values and addresses it using a dual approach: firstly, a radar chart showed the five criteria of a post-interview value chain assessment for the eight museums examined: 1. collection/research; 2. exhibitions/promotion; 3. education/innovation; 4. value-added commercial activities; and 5. interactions with the local community. Secondly, the eight museums’ cultural values and levels of interactions with local community were illustrated in a four-quadrant Cartesian coordinate graph where Quadrant I connotes a combination of high cultural value and high-level interactions with the local community; Quadrant II a combination of low cultural value and high-level interactions with the local community; Quadrant III, low cultural value and low-level interactions with the local community; and Quadrant IV, high cultural value and low-level interactions with the local community. By further analyzing the eight design museums’ Cartesian coordinate graphs, this study’s author divided their cultural values into three types: “localized cultural values”, “globalized cultural values” and “branded cultural-values”. This new theoretical model underscores the eight museums’ dynamic qualities and varying forms from different development perspectives.

Besides, major findings from this study are: design museums’ cultural values tend to be reflected through collections/exhibitions; most of the eight museums examined had low-level interactions with their local design community and resources; design museums’ shops and value-added commercial activities were not significantly correlated to their cultural values, and the commercial nature of “design” did not cause any significant difference in reflecting museum’s commercial functions; a strategically innovative architectural design is conducive to the museum’s branding strategy; and each design museum should develop a distinctive curatorial and display strategy to differentiate between arts- and history-oriented venues.

This study suggests that a well-functioned design museum project should be developed in Taiwan. The museum education programs can strengthen the insufficiency of design education in K-12 school system to become an important channel of learning aesthetics of life. Design industry in Taiwan can count on the design museum’s cultural advantages for bringing culture into industry and raising the communication power of Taiwan design culture. Furthermore, a design museum project can be advised to adopt the pattern of “themed design museums” to develop a consumption culture and international brand strategies through effective museum management and business model. Considering Taiwan’s existing fine art museums or museum resources, it is recommended that these museums should give top priority to “localized cultural values” for Taiwan design industry, and present a substantive statement of localization (which involves the position of Taiwanese designs in the global design industry) and their irreplaceable qualities before fostering “globalized cultural values” as a goal.

中文資料

A. N. Oppenheim(2002)。問卷設計、訪談及態度測量。呂以榮譯。台北：六和出版社。

大衛．索羅斯比(David Throsby)(2005)。文化經濟學。台北：典藏藝術家庭股份有限公
司。p.5。

王焜生(2012)。昔日煤礦舊城轉型為21世紀文化新都-德國．魯爾工業區。今藝術。2012,
April 9。檢自：http://mag.chinatimes.com/mag-cnt.aspx?artid=13482&page=1。

中華民國博物館學會(2007)。歷年台灣公私立博物館數目與比例統計。檢自：
http://www.cam.org.tw/3-profession/statistics-data/06publicprivate.htm

巴萊與康諾(Stephen Bayley&Terence Coran)(2009)：設計全書A-Z(Design)。何佳芸、
楊久穎、廖素珊、羅珊珊翻議。台北市：積木文化。

弗德利希．瓦達荷西博士(Dr. Waidacher, Friedrich)(2005)。博物館學(理論)-德語系世界
的觀點。張譽騰審定。曾于珍、林資傑、吳介祥、林潔盈、桂雅文譯。台北：五關
藝術管理有限公司。

花建(2003)。文化+創意=財富-全世界最快速致富產業的經營Know-how。台北：帝國文
化出版社。

李天鐸、邱誌勇、Andy C. Pratt、Jason Potts、Leith Negus、Chris Bilton等(2010)。文化
創意產業讀本。台北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。

佐口七朗編著(1990)。設計概論。台北：藝風堂出版社。

林立樹(2007)。現代思潮-西方文化研究之通路。台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。

林仲如(2012)。英國創意產業政策下的博物館、美術館轉變。國立台灣師範大學美術所，
台北市。

林炎旦編(2011)。2010創意經濟報告/聯合國貿易與發展會議。台北市：師大書苑有限
公司。

南藝大。博物館教學資源中心。檢自http://art.tnnua.edu.tw/museum/html/real_us.html。

高希均(2010)。18世紀「分工」創造人類繁榮 21世紀「整合」帶來世界和諧。遠見雜
誌(華人峰會專刊特刊)，12月。檢自：
http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_17082.html。

耿鳳英(2011)。〈誰的故事〉。台中《博物館學季刊》，25(3)，99-111。

麥可．克魯格(Michael Kroeger)(2010)。設計是甚麼？。吳莉君譯。台北：大雁文化事
業股份有限公司。

陳又淳(2008)。城市博物館與認同建構-以高雄市歷史博物館為例。國立台北藝術大學傳
統藝術研究所，台北市。

連俐俐(2010)。大美術館時代。台北：典藏藝術家庭股份有限公司。

馮永華、楊裕富(2006)。設計風格行程因素的研究。設計學報。11(3)，pp 102-106。

陶雅育(2010)。企業博物館公關功能指標之建構。世新大學公共關係暨廣告學所，台北
市。

凱薩琳．溫瓦德(Kathryn Woodward)(2006)。認同與差異。林文琪譯。台北：韋伯文化。

葉朗、花建、喬然、陳少峰、錢光培、金麗紅等(2004)。北大文化產業關鍵報告。台北：
帝國文化出版社。

黃光男(2002)。理事長的話。博物館簡訊，中華民國博物館學會。檢自
http://www.cam.org.tw/5-newsletter/19.htm

黃朝盟(2007)。台北市城市競爭力之研究。台北市：台北市政府研究發展考核委員會委
託。

約翰．郝金斯(John Hawkins)(2003)。創意經濟－好點子變成好生意。李璞良譯。台北：
典藏藝術家庭股份有限公司。

畢恆達(2010)。教授為什麼沒告訴我。新北市：小畢空間出版社。

張譽騰(2005)。中文導讀。博物館學(理論)-德語系世界的觀點(pp.14-16)。張譽騰審定。
曾于珍、林資傑、吳介祥、林潔盈、桂雅文譯。台北：五觀藝術管理有限公司

張保隆、謝寶火爰(2006)。學術論文寫作：APA規範。台北：華泰文化。

張婉真(2009)。消費文化、博物館與社會大眾。博物館學季刊。23(2):5-20。

凱．朱利耶(Guy Julier)(2009)。設計的文化(the Culture of Design)。鄭郁欣譯。台北：韋
伯文化。

維吉尼亞．帕斯楚(Virginia Postrel)(2004)。風格、美感、經濟學(The Substance of Style)。
台北：商智文化。

蔡昭儀(2004)。全球古根化效應。台北：典藏藝術家庭股份有限公司。

質性研究的設計(2009)。韋伯文化網路試閱版。檢自：
http://www.weber.com.tw/document/pdf/SR07-001-01.pdf

劉婉珍(2002)。美術館教育理念與實務。台北 市 ：南天書局。

劉維公(2001)。當代消費文化社會理論的分析架構－文化經濟學、生活風格與生活美
學。東吳學報。11期，pp.113-136。

劉維公(2006)。風格社會。台北：天下雜誌。

賴瑛瑛(2010)。文化開創-從文化價值的觀點談博物館的藝術家駐館計畫。現代美術學報。
20(10)，pp91-112。

發現史前館電子報。137期，2008。

維基百科。文化工業。檢索日期：2012年6月20日。檢自：http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%96%87%E5%8C%96%E5%B7%A5%E6%A5%AD)

英文資料

Alexander, Ella (2013). The design museum receives fashion donation. Vogue. Retrieved Jan
29, 2013. http://www.vogue.co.uk/news/2013/01/29/design-museum-receives-fashion-collection-donation-from-lady-ritblat

Alice Rawsthorn. A Paris mecca of decorative arts begin anew. Retrieved August 31, 2012.
The New York Times. from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/03/style/03iht-design4.html

Bauhaus Archive Berlin(2010). The Bauhaus Collection. Berlin: Bauhaus Archive Berlin.

Britannica. 1990.

Cummings, Neil and Lewandowska, Marysia(2010). The value of things. Switzland：
Birkhaeuser-publishers for Architecture.

Danilov, Victor(1992). A Planning Guide for Corporate Museums, Galleries, and Visitor
Centers. USA CT: Greenwood Press.

Design Ventura. http://ventura.designmuseum.org/

Featherstone, Mike(2007). Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. London：Sage
Publications Ltd.

Geoffrey Jones(2005). Restoring a global economy, 1950~1980, Harvard Business School.
Retrieved Sept. 5, 2012. from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/4961.html

Holden, John(2004). Capturing Culture Value. DEMOS.

History of design city Nagoya. Retrieved Sept. 4, 2012. from:
http://www.creative-nagoya.jp/nagoya_unesco/ayumi_e.html

Histories and objectives. Design Museum Denmark. Retrieved August 25, 2012. from:
http://designmuseum.dk/en/information/underpunkt-b

ICOM，檢索日期2012年6月21日，檢自：
http://icom.museum/who-we-are/the-vision/museum-definition.html

Mercedes-Benz(2010). Mercedes-Benz Museum. Mercedes-Benz Museum BmbH.

Moore, Karl and Reid, Susan(2008). The birth of brand：4000 years of branding history,
Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Retrieved Oct. 2, 2012. from
http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10169/

Pearce, Susan M(1989). Museum Studies in Material Culture. Leicester and London:
Leicester University Press.

Poster museum, http://www.postermuseum.pl/index.php/Array/index.php/en/page/show
/history

Windlin, Cornel and Fehlbaum, Rolf(2008). Project Vitra. Basel：Birkhaeuser Verlag AG.

Red dot. Retrieved August 31, 2012. from : http://en.red-dot.org/2062.html

Sony Archives. Retrieved Sept. 5, 2012. from:
http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/CorporateInfo/History/Museum/index.html

The Design Museum uses light to create the splendour of an exhibition. Retrieved August 10,
2012. from:
http://www.helvar.com/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/Helsinki_Design_museum_EN.pdf

Shiseido Co., Ltd(2003). The shiseido story-a history of shiseido:1872-1972. Public relations
department.

This is design. http://www.thisisdesign.co/#home

Tim Brown(2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved Sept. 5, 2012. from
http://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinking/ar/1

Throsby, David(2010). The Economics of cultural policy. Cambridge University Press.

Vines, Richard(2011). Conran’s 17.5 pond donation to new Design Museum. Bloomberg.
Retrieved August 15, 2012. fromhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-29/terence-conran-donates-28-million-to-aid-london-s-design-museum-expansion.html)

Weckerle, Christoph and Gerig, Manfred and Soendermann, Michael(2008). Creative
Industries Switzerland-Fact, Models, Culture. Basel: Birkhaeuser Verlag AG.