簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 鄭世昌
Jeng, Shih-Chang
論文名稱: 產品環境友善性、產品創意性與專案親社會性對於募資成功的影響
Product Environmental Friendliness, Product Creativity and Project Prosocialty and Crowdfunding Successfulness
指導教授: 林舒柔
Lin, Shu-Jou
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 全球經營與策略研究所
Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 68
中文關鍵詞: 群眾募資產品環境友善性產品創意性專案親社會性
英文關鍵詞: environmentally friendly product, eco-friendly product, creativity product
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000265
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:273下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

群眾募資的出現,提供缺乏資金的新創企業展示產品的舞台,近年來也越來越多研究從影響群眾募資成效的因素延伸至宣稱環境友善性、產品創意性、親社會性的層面,探討這些因素如何提升群眾贊助專案的意願並共同關注環境及社會等議題。本研究以量化的方式蒐集Kickstarter網站上產品設計及服飾類別的資料,探討宣稱環境友善性、產品創意性、親社會性是否有助於群眾募資成功。而本研究透過迴歸實證結果發現,環境友善性並未顯著影響募資結果,但產品的創意性及親社會性將是影響群眾募資成功的可能因素,並運用個案探討以建議未來提案者如何在群眾募資中獲得成功。

As crowdfunding emerged, providing a stage for startups which lack of resources to develop products. In recent years, more and more research has explored fundraising successfulness by addressing the aspect of project environmental friendliness, product creativity, and project prosocialty. This study collects data from the categories of product design and apparel on Kickstarter, the earliest and most prevalent crowdfunding platform. The study finds that product environmental friendliness does not significantly affect the fundraising results, but product creativity and project prosocialty positively affect fundraising successfulness. Discussions and managerial implications are also provided.

摘 要 i Abstract ii 目 錄 iii 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧與假說建立 5 第一節 群眾募資背景 5 第二節 影響募資成功的因素 6 第三章 研究方法 14 第一節 研究對象 14 第二節 研究樣本 16 第三節 變數衡量 16 第四章 研究結果與分析 23 第一節 敘述統計 23 第二節 相關性分析 26 第三節 迴歸分析 28 第五章 個案討論 30 第一節 環境友善成功及失敗個案探討 30 第二節 創意性專案成功及失敗個案探討 38 第三節 親社會性專案成功及失敗個案探討 44 第六章 結論與建議 50 第一節 研究發現與建議 50 第二節 未來建議與研究限制 54 參考文獻 55 附 錄 59 附錄A 親社會性關鍵字列表 59 附錄B CAT創意性評鑑量表 61 附錄C Kickstarter專案樣本 63

Allison, T. H., Davis, B. C., Short, J. C., & Webb, J. W. (2015). Crowdfunding in a prosocial microlending environment: Examining the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 53-73.

Allison, T. H., Davis, B. C., Webb, J. W., & Short, J. C. (2017). Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 707-725.

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997-1013.

Andrews, J., & Smith, D. C. (1996). In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(2), 174-187.

Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2013). Individual crowdfunding practices. Venture Capital, 15(4), 313-333.

Belleflamme, P., Omrani, N., & Peitz, M. (2015). The economics of crowdfunding platforms. Information Economics and Policy, 33(12), 11-28.

Boeuf, B., Darveau, J., & Legoux, R. (2014). Financing Creativity: Crowdfunding as a New Approach for Theatre Projects. International Journal of Arts Management, 16(3), 33-48.

Calic, G. and E. Mosakowski (2016). Kicking off social entrepreneurship: How a sustainability orientation influences crowdfunding success. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5),738-767.

Cseh, G. M., & Jeffries, K. K. (2019). A scattered CAT: A critical evaluation of the consensual assessment technique for creativity research. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 159-166.

Dai, H., & Zhang, D. J. (2019). Prosocial goal pursuit in crowdfunding: Evidence from Kickstarter. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(3), 498-517.

Davis, B. C., Hmieleski, K. M., Webb, J. W., & Coombs, J. E. (2017). Funders' positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs' crowdfunding pitches: The influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 90-106.

Du, Z., Li, M., & Wang, K. (2019). The more options, the better? Investigating the impact of the number of options on backers’ decisions in reward-based crowdfunding projects. Information & Management, 56(3), 429-444.

Gleasure, R., & Feller, J. (2016). Does heart or head rule donor behaviors in charitable crowdfunding markets? International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20(4), 499-524.

Greenberg, M. D., & Gerber, E. M. (2014). Learning to fail: experiencing public failure online through crowdfunding. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 581-590.

Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 98(3), 392-404.

Hansen, E. G., & Grosse-Dunker, F. (2013). Sustainability-oriented innovation. Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 2407-2417.

Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science, 316(5831), 1622-1625.

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. The Nature of Creativity, 22 (1988), 11-38.
Hörisch, J. (2015). Crowdfunding for environmental ventures: an empirical analysis of the influence of environmental orientation on the success of crowdfunding initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107(11), 636-645.

Johnstone, M. L., & Tan, L. P. (2015). Exploring the gap between consumers’ green rhetoric and purchasing behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 311-328.
Dai, H., & Zhang, D. J. (2019). Prosocial goal pursuit in crowdfunding: evidence from Kickstarter. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(3) 498-517.

Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers. In The Economics of Crowdfunding , 1(2)151-182.

Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503-520.

Liu, D., Brass, D., Lu, Y., & Chen, D. (2015). Friendships in online peer-to-peer lending: Pipes, prisms, and relational herding. Mis Quarterly, 39(3), 729-742.

Maxwell, A. L., & Lévesque, M. (2014). Trustworthiness: A critical ingredient for entrepreneurs seeking investors. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1057-1080.
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16.

Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36(4), 225-241.

Pietraszkiewicz, A., Soppe, B., & Formanowicz, M. M. (2017). Go Pro Bono: Prosocial Language as a Success Factor in Crowdfunding. Social Psychology, 48(5), 265-278.

Reczek, R. W., Irwin, J. R., Zane, D. M., & Ehrich, K. R. (2017). That’s not how I remember it: Willfully ignorant memory for ethical product attribute information. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 185-207.

Spaeth, S., Stuermer, M., & Von Krogh, G. (2010). Enabling knowledge creation through outsiders: towards a push model of open innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3-4), 411-431.

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in Creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688.

Stanko, M. A., & Henard, D. H. (2017). Toward a better understanding of crowdfunding, openness and the consequences for innovation. Research Policy, 46(4), 784-798.

Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2011). The New Field of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Studying Entrepreneurial Action Linking What is to Be Sustained-with What is to Be Developed. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 137-163.

Wolfe, K. L., & Shanklin, C. W. (2001). Environmental practices and management concerns of conference center administrators. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 25(2), 209-216.

下載圖示
QR CODE