簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 宣崇慧
Chung-Hui Hsuan
論文名稱: 直接教學模式對不同認知問題識字困難學童學習成效及其相關因素之研究
The effect of Direct Instruction Model on Chinese dyslexic children with different reading related cognitive problems
指導教授: 盧台華
Lu, Tai-Hua
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 281
中文關鍵詞: 直接教學模式識字困難學童分散識字編排集中識字編排學習監控精熟練習
英文關鍵詞: Direct Instruction Model, Character reading difficulty, Chinese reading, Chinese dyslexia
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:346下載:90
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要探究直接教學模式對不同認知問題識字困難學童識字與字-詞應用學習成效與相關影響因素。共包括兩個系列性的研究,研究一先以20名識字困難學童為對象,以聽覺處理、視覺處理、中文字形知識與唸名速度四個識字相關認知成份為變項,比較識字困難組學童(RD)識字相關認知成份表現分別與非識字困難之同年齡對照組(CA)以及識字量相當但年齡較小對照組(RL)學童之差異;再將每位RD學童之各項認知成份表現與CA及RL組進行比較,統計不同認知成份缺陷與落後的出現比例與識字困難學童認知問題的人數分佈情形。進而從不同認知問題形態中選出6名學童參與研究二之教學活動。研究二分別以直接教學模式與形聲相似字配合學習監控與精熟練習,以識字困難之不同認知問題學童(各3名)為受試進行教學介入實驗。研究結果如下:

    研究一:識字困難學童識字相關認知成份困難之差異與認知成份困難的出現情形

    一、 RD組學童注音唸名表現同時顯著較CA組與RL組學童差,表示識字困難學童之注音唸名速度表現處於缺陷的狀況;
    二、 RD學童之聲調覺識、聲調記憶、視覺符號記憶、字形規則區辨、部首表義知識、數字唸名、顏色唸名與圖畫唸名能力與RL組無顯著差異但較CA組差,表示此等能力處於落後但非缺陷的狀況;
    三、 三組學童之視覺符號配對、字形組合能力與聲旁表音知識三項能力間無顯著差異,表示此三項能力與識字困難的問題關係較小。
    四、 個別分析識字困難學童的各項認知成份困難的出現比例發現,所有(20名)識字困難學童中,有30%(6名)的學童各項識字相關認知成份僅處於落後的情況;其餘14名(70%)學童有一項以上認知成份出現缺陷的情況。
    五、 在認知成份缺陷的學童中,唸名缺陷的人數比例最高(65%);其次為聽覺處理缺陷(35%);同時出現唸名與聽覺處理缺陷的人數比例亦達30%(6位)之多,其中有2位學童(10%)同時亦出現視覺處理缺陷問題。
    六、 研究者根據研究一個別認知成份分析的結果,挑選2名唸名缺陷、2名多重缺陷(「唸名缺陷、聽覺處理缺陷」與「唸名、聽覺處理、視覺處理缺陷」)、2名認知落後學童,做為第二階段研究對象,探究直接教學模式對不同認知問題識字困難學童的教學成效。

    研究二:直接教學模式與形聲相似字配合學習監控與精熟練習流程對學童識字學習效果的影響、錯誤類型分析結果與滿意度調查

    一、 直接教學模式與形聲相似字配合學習監控與精熟練習流程均使唸名缺陷、多重缺陷與認知落後三種認知問題學童在單字與字-詞造句應用的學習上,產生顯著的學習效果。
    二、 直接教學模式為三組不同認知問題學童之單字與字-詞應用學習帶來更大且更穩定的學習效果。
    三、 歸納學童錯誤型態,由較不成熟到較成熟的識字發展趨勢可分為無反應、視覺錯誤、字形功能運用錯誤與聲旁錯誤四種類型。
    四、 錯誤類型分析結果顯示,直接教學模式與形聲相似字配合學習監控與精熟練習流程可幫助三種認知問題學童運用更為成熟的認字策略認字。
    五、 不同認知問題學童接受直接教學模式後的犯錯率隨著不同處理期的減少幅度,比形聲相似字配合學習監控與精熟練習流程對照組學童明顯。
    六、 不同認知問題學童均表示對直接教學模式的各項重要元素感到滿意。
    七、 學童對直接教學模式之分散識字的教學設計、精熟練習與複習、聲韻練習、檢視學習曲線與增強方式等重要元素感到最滿意。

    綜合本研究結果,研究者在未來研究上與教學上,針對中文識字認知成份問題、未來認知缺陷組型分析的探究與直接教學模式在中文識字教學上提出建議。

    The effect of Direct Instruction Model on Chinese dyslexic children with different reading related cognitive problems

    Abstract

    This research incorporates 2 serial studies. Study 1 investigates the cognitive problems of 20 Chinese-speaking children with reading difficulty (RD group). The RD group’s tonal abilities, visual abilities, Chinese orthographic abilities and naming speed are measured and compared with 2 matched groups, namely the chronological age group (CA group) and the reading level group (RL group). In Study 2, Single-subject multiple-probe design is used to investigate the instructional effects of Direct Instruction Model (DI) on RD children with different cognitive problems. Six RD children participated in Study 2 are recruited from Study 1. The 6 participants are paired and divided into the experimental and controlled groups, in which 3 take part in the DI instructional program as the experimental group, and the other 3 participate in the complex-intervention program consisted of similar phonetic components and monitored learning with mastery processes (SPMM) as the control group. The results of Study 1 and Study 2 are listed below:

    Study 1

    1. Zhu-Yin naming speed of RD group is significantly slower than that of CA and RL groups, suggesting that Chinese RD children’s Zhu-Yin naming speed is deficient.
    2. The abilities of tonal awareness, tonal memory, visual memory, Chinese orthographic awareness, understanding the orthographic function of semantic component, number naming, color naming and picture naming of the RD group are significantly poorer than that of the CA group but statistically similar to that of the RL group, suggesting that these abilities of RD children are delayed but not deficient.
    3. The differences in the abilities of visual pair, understanding how to use the function of orthographic regularity and phonetic component between the RD, CA and RL groups are not significant, suggesting that these 3 abilities are not the major cognitive problems of Chinese RD children.
    4. Six out of the 20 children in the RD group (30%) have merely delayed but not deficient cognitive problems; while 70% of them have at least one reading related cognitive problems in deficient.
    5. Thirteen out of the 20 RD children’s (65%) are deficient in naming speed; 7 (35%) are deficient in tonal ability, and 6 out of the 7 children are deficient in naming speed at the same time; 2 (10%) are deficient in visual abilities, and both of them are also deficient in naming speed and tonal awareness.
    6. Three pairs of students with different cognitive problems are recruited according to the results of Study 1: one pair of the participants in Study 2 are recruited from the cognitive-delayed group; and the other 2 pairs of the participants are respectively recruited from cognitive-deficient groups of naming speed and multiple deficient groups.

    Study 2

    1. Significant positive effects of both DI and SPMM on the performances of children with different cognitive problems in learning to read Chinese characters and in learning to use a new Chinese word to form new sentences are found; nevertheless, the effects of DI are greater than that of SPMM.
    2. Four error-patterns representing different developmental phases of character reading are generalized, they are none response, visual cue error, orthographic cue error and phonetic cue error.
    3. According to the participants’ changes of the error-patters in different periods of intervention, both the DI and SPMM can help children to learn to use the more mature strategies to read Chinese characters; nevertheless, children in the DI program make more obvious and stable changes than those in the SPMM program.
    4. Children in the DI program gradually make fewer errors than those in the SPMM program.
    5. Children with different cognitive problems are satisfied with the all the components of DI, especially in the design of the teaching methods, the processes of mastery and practice, learning the phonological information embedded in the characters, monitoring the progresses and the ways of showing rewards in the middle of teaching.

    目 錄 內 容 頁碼 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與研究問題 15 研究目的 15 研究問題 15 第三節 名詞解釋 17 第二章 文獻探討 22 第一節 中文字、詞的特性 22 中文字 22 中文詞 29 第二節 識字歷程的理論 30 識字歷程理論 31 兒童識字發展之相關文獻探討 40 第三節 識字困難的認知缺陷假說之探討 48 研究派點分析 48 中文識字困難學童不同認知問題之探究 51 中文識字認知缺陷與缺陷組型假說之探究 63 第四節 識字困難的補救教學 68 讀寫問題與補救教學之介入 68 直接教學模式 78 第三章 研究方法 92 第一節 研究架構 93 研究一研究設計 94 研究二研究設計95 第二節 研究一 92 研究對象 95 研究工具 96 研究程序 102 資料分析與整理 104 第三節 研究二 104 研究對象 104 研究工具 106 研究程序 112 資料分析與整理 129 第四章 結果與討論 133 第一節 研究一 133 識字困難學童各類識字相關認知成份之困難情形 133 識字困難學童識字相關認知成份困難之人數分佈情形 143 討論與分析 149 第二節 研究二結果與討論 161 直接教學模式與形聲相似字配合學習監控與精熟練習流程兩種介入對不同認知問題學童單字與字-詞應用學習效果 162 錯誤類型分析 195 學童對直接教學模式之滿意度分析 209 第五章 結論與建議 213 第一節 結 論 213 識字困難學童各項識字相關認知成份問題之發現 214 直接教學模式之重要元素對不同認知問題學童單字與字-詞造句應用學習之影響 216 學童對直接教學模式重要元素之滿意程度 219 第二節 研究限制 220 樣本代表性的問題 220 教學範圍只限於單字及詞彙 220 字料選取對直接教學模式的影響 220 研究設計之限制 221 第三節 研究建議 221 對未來教學之建議 221 對未來研究之建議 224 參考文獻 227 附 錄 附錄一 學校公文 248 附錄二(1)研究一家長同意書(正常組學童) 249 (2)研究一家長同意書(識字困難學童) 250 附錄三 研究二家長同意書 251 附錄四(1)教學腳本(直接教學模式-單字教學) 252 (2)教學腳本(直接教學模式-字-詞應用教學) 254 (3)教學腳本(形聲相似字配合學習監控與精熟練習-單字教學) 258 (4)教學腳本(學習監控與精熟練習-字-詞應用教學) 261 附錄五(1)教學流程信度檢核表(直接教學模式-單字教學) 264 (2)教學流程信度檢核表(直接教學模式-字詞教學) 266 (3)教學流程信度檢核表(形聲相似字配合學習監控與精熟練習- 單字教學) 267 (4)教學流程信度檢核表(學習監控與精熟練習-字詞教學) 268 附錄六(1)形聲相似字配合學習監控與精熟練習單-單字 270 (2)字-詞應用學習監控與精熟練習單 272 附錄七 滿意度問卷 274 附錄八 造句測驗句型架構對照表 277 附錄九 識字困難學童各項認知能力落後與缺陷之切截分數與個別分析表 278 附錄十 每位學童每次教學後之學習表現整理 279 圖 表 次 圖 次 圖2-1-1 中、英文聲音結構對照說明 27 圖2-2-1 交互激發理論的識字歷程圖 34 圖2-2-2 識字的平行分佈模式 35 圖2-3-1 字母唸名的處理歷程模式 圖3-1-1 研究架構圖 61 93 圖3-3-1a「直接教學模式」單字教學程序 121 圖3-3-1b「形聲相似字配合學習監控與精熟練習」單字教學程序 121 圖3-3-2a「直接教學模式」字-詞應用教學程序 123 圖3-3-2b「學習監控與精熟練習」字-詞應用教學程序 123 圖4-2-1 S16與S3在單字唸讀與雙字詞造句學習情形 170 圖4-2-2 S13與S7在單字唸讀與雙字詞造句學習情形 176 圖4-2-3 S12與S18在單字唸讀與雙字詞造句學習情形 182 表 次 表2-4-1 不同教學介入媒介與取向之教學設計、功能與成效 79 表2-4-2 直接教學模式在讀寫教學上的相關研究 87 表2-4-3 直接閱讀補救教學課程之成效 90 表3-2-1 各組兒童之年齡、非語文智力與識字量之平均數、標準差與配對情形 96 表3-3-1 教學實驗研究受試之基本資料 105 表3-3-2 教學字與教學雙字詞整理表 110 表3-3-3 兩種教學模式字、詞教學內容編排整理表 118 表3-3-4 兩種教學介入之教學內容編排與教學過程之對照 124 表4-1-1 三組學童各項能力表現之平均數與標準差 135 表4-1-2 三組學童在各項認知能力上之變異數分析摘要表 136 表4-1-3 識字困難組學童各項認知能力缺陷及落後情形統計表 145 表4-1-4 識字困難學童缺陷/落後組型分析統計表 149 表4-2-1 S12在單字唸讀與字-詞造句學習之資料分析表 165 表4-2-2 S16單字與字-詞造句應用學習之C統計摘要表 166 表4-2-3 S3學童在單字唸讀與字-詞造句學習資料分析表 168 表4-2-4 S3單字與字-詞造句應用學習之C統計摘要表 168 表4-2-5 S13學童在單字唸讀與字-詞造句學習之資料分析表 172 表4-2-6 S13單字與字-詞造句應用學習之C統計摘要表 172 表4-2-7 S7學童在單字唸讀與字-詞造句學習之資料分析表 174 表4-2-8 S7單字與字-詞造句應用學習之C統計摘要表 175 表4-2-9 S12學童在單字唸讀與字-詞造句學習之資料分析表 178 表4-2-10 S12單字與字-詞造句應用學習之C統計摘要表 179 表4-2-11 S18學童在單字唸讀與字-詞造句學習之資料分析表 180 表4-2-12 S18單字與字-詞造句應用學習之C統計摘要表 181 表4-2-13 唸名缺陷學童在不同實驗過程之識字錯誤類型分析表 200 表4-2-14 多重缺陷學童在不同實驗過程之識字錯誤類型分析表 203 表4-2-15 認知落後學童在不同實驗過程之識字錯誤類型分析表 205 表4-2-16 「直接教學模式」滿意度分析 212

    參考文獻
    方金雅(1996):國小學生一般字彙知識、認字能力與國語文學業成就之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    王淑貞(1999):不同學習特質學習障礙學童接受字族文教學之歷程研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    王惠君(2003):部件識字策略對國小學習障礙學生識字成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系在職專班碩士論文(未出版)。
    王瓊珠 (2001):台灣地區讀寫障礙研究回顧與展望。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,11(4),頁331-344。
    王瓊珠 (2005):閱讀障礙學生識字教學研究回顧與問題探究。載於洪儷瑜、王瓊珠、陳長益合編,突破學習困難:評量與因應之探討 (頁139-178)。台北市:心理出版社。
    王瓊珠(2003):讀寫能力合一補救教學系列研究(I)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告,NSC91-2413-H-133-014。
    王瓊珠(2004):讀寫能力合一補救教學系列研究(II)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告,NSC91-2413-H-133-014。
    王瓊珠、洪儷瑜、陳秀芬(2007):低識字能力學生識字量發展之研究-馬太效應之可能表現,特殊教育研究學刊,32(3),頁1-16。
    邱明秀(2003):中文部首分色識字教學法對國小識字困難學童教學成效之研究。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    李俊仁(1998):聲韻處理能力和閱讀能力之關係。國立中正大學心理研究所博士論文(未出版)。
    李俊仁(2001):中文閱讀障礙者的認知功能缺陷—視覺空間或是聲韻處理?取自http://www.tmue.edu.tw/~kidcen/paper/2-04.pdf
    呂美娟(2000):基本字帶字識字教學對國小識字困難學生成效之探討,特殊教育研究學刊,18,頁207-235。
    何珮菁(2007):直接教學模式應用在國中資源班學生數學學習成效之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所教學碩士論文(未出版)。
    林彥同(2001):幼稚園至國小三年級學童各類唸名速度能力的發展與閱讀能力的相關。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    林素貞(1998):相似字與非相似字呈現方式對國小一年級國語科低成就學生生字學習效果之比較。特殊教育與復健學報,6,頁261-277。
    林素貞(2005):國小低年級讀寫障礙學生教室內學習行為問題解決模式。載於洪儷瑜、王瓊珠、陳長益合編,突破學習困難:評量與因應之探討 (頁97 - 138)。台北市:心理出版社。
    林燕玲(2000):直接教學模式對青春期嚴重情緒障礙學生社會技巧教學成效之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    胡永崇(2001):不同識字教學策略對國小三年級閱讀障礙學童教學成效之比較研究。屏東師院學報,14,頁179-218。
    胡永崇(2003):國小四年級閱讀困難學生識字相關因素及不同識字教學策略之教學成效比較研究。屏東師院學報,19,頁177-216。
    宣崇慧(2007):二年級學童讀字相關認知因素及運用聲韻原則習字模式之探究。特殊教育研究學刊,32(3),頁17-37。
    宣崇慧、盧台華(2006):聲韻覺識能力及口語詞彙知識與國小一至二年級學童字、詞閱讀發展之關係與影響。特殊教育研究學刊,31,頁73-92。
    俞筱鈞(1993):瑞文氏彩色圖形推理測驗。台北:中國行為科學社。
    施彥亨(2001):直接教學模式在國小智能障礙學生口腔衛生教學之應用成效研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    施惠玲(2000):認字困難兒童之認字教學 -- 個案研究。國立台東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    劭淑華(1997):直接教學模式在國小數學資源班學生補救教學之成效研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    高佩蓉(2006):直接教學模式與建構式教學法於數學困難學生二位數進位加法、退位減法教學成效之比較。國立台南大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    涂瑞臻(2006):直接教學模式及自我監控策略對國小六年級數學低成就學生數學學習成效之探討。國立台北教育大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    洪慧芳(1993):文字組合規則與漢語閱讀障礙 — 對漢語閱讀障礙學童的一項追蹤研究。國立中正大學心理研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    洪儷瑜(1998):國語文低成就學生在閱讀歷程的視知覺和聽覺理解能力之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告,NSC 87-2413-H-003-018-F5。
    洪儷瑜(2001):漢字視知覺測驗。台北,心理出版社。
    洪儷瑜(2003):中文讀寫困難學生適性化補救教學:由常用字發展基本讀寫技能(I )。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告,NSC 91-2413-H-003-020。
    洪儷瑜(2005):中文讀寫困難學生適性化補救教學:由常用字發展基本讀寫技能(II)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告, NSC 92-2413-H-003-020。
    秦麗花、許家吉(2000):形聲字教學對國小二年級一般學生和學障學生識字教學效果之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,18,頁191-206。
    許天威(2003):個案實驗研究法。台北,五南。
    陳以青(2004):學習障礙兒童在工作記憶表現之探討。國立中正大學心理學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    陳怡伶(2004):閱讀障礙學生的聲韻覺識、唸名速度和視覺技巧與識字的關係。國立台南大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    陳秀芬(1999):中文一般字彙知識教學法在增進國小識字困難學生識字學習成效之探討。特殊教育研究學刊,17,頁225-251。
    陳秋燕(2003):國民中學國語文直接教學課程之發展。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    陳淑麗、曾世杰(2005):唸名速度及聲韻覺識在中文閱讀障礙亞型分類上的角色 -- 個案補救教學研究。載於洪儷瑜、王瓊珠、陳長益合編,突破學習困難-評量與因應之探討(頁179-214)。台北市:心理出版社。
    陳靜子(1996):國語低成就兒童之生字學習:部首歸類與聲旁歸類教學效果之比較。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    黃君宜(2007):直接教學模式對國中聽覺障礙學生英語科學習之成效研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所教學碩士論文(未出版)。
    黃芸(2003):中文閱讀障礙研究~以國中小學生為例。國立中原大學心理研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    黃沛榮(2003):漢字教學的理論與實踐。台北:樂學。
    黃秀霜(1999):不同教學方式對學習困難兒童之實驗教學助益分析。課程與教學季刊,2(1),頁69-82。
    黃秀霜(2001):中文年級識字測驗。台北:心理出版社。
    黃美蘭(2006):直接教學模式對國小智能障礙學生時間概念學習成效之研究。國立台北教育大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    黃道賢(2003):增進識字困難學生識字學習之探討。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    教育部(2000):「國小學童常用字詞調查報告書」。國語文教育叢書43。http://www.edu.tw/mandr/result/primary/shindex.htm
    教育部(2002):身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準。教育部特殊教育工作小組。
    郭紅伶(2001):相似字與非相似字認字教學策略對國小低年級認字困難學生學習生字成效之影響。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    陸莉、劉鴻香(1994):畢保德圖畫詞彙測驗。台北:心理出版社。
    曾世杰(1999):聲調覺識測驗。台北:國科會特殊教育小組。
    曾世杰、邱上真、林彥同(2003):幼稚園至國小三年級學童各類唸名速度能力與閱讀能力的相關。師大學報,48(2),頁261-290。
    曾世杰、簡淑真、張媛婷、周蘭芳、連芸伶(2005):以早期唸名速度及聲韻覺識預測中文閱讀與認字:一個追蹤四年的相關研究。特殊教育研究學刊,28, 頁123-144。
    葉素玲(2003):中文部件與整字的關係探討(I & II)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告,NSC 91-2413-H-002-013 & NSC 91-2413-H-003-026。
    程祥徽、田小琳(1992):現代漢語。台北:書林。
    傅淳鈴、黃秀霜(2000):小學國語低成就學生後設語言覺知實驗教學成效分析。中華心理學刊,42(1),頁87-100。
    溫瓊怡(2003):電腦多媒體漢字部件教學系統對國小閱讀障礙學生識字學習成效之研究。國立嘉義大學特殊教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
    詹秀文(2001):直接教學模式對國中身心障礙資源班學生英語科學習之成效研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    廖凰伶(2000):直接教學與全語言教學對國中低閱讀能力學生閱讀理解表現之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    劉家智(2001):國小四、五、六年級兒童唸名速度與國語文能力相關之研究。國立台東教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    蔡韻晴(2001):雙缺陷假說在中文閱讀障礙之檢驗:各亞型認知成分之比較。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    盧台華(1998):身心障礙學生課程教材之研究與應用。身心障礙教育研討會記錄。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系。
    盧台華(1986):直接教學法在智能不足教學成效上之探討。我國特殊教育的現代化—中華民國特殊教育學會年刊(p105-112),中華民國特殊教育學會。
    盧台華(1995):「修訂基礎數學編序教材」相關因素探討及對身心障礙者應用成效之比較研究。國科會研究計畫未出版。
    盧台華(1993):特殊班教學設計。特殊教育研習專輯。嘉義師範學院特殊教育中心。
    錡寶香(2006):兒童語言障礙理論、評量與教學。台北:心理出版社。
    謝俊明、曾世杰(2004):閱讀障礙學生與一般學生在唸名速度上的比較研究。台東大學教育學報,15(2),頁193-216。
    薛淑芬(2003):直接教學模式對國小啟智班智能障礙學生英語科學習之成效研究。國立嘉義大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    鐘素鵑 (2003):聲韻覺識教學對國小低年級注音符號學習困難學童之成效分析。國立台北師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    羅肇錦(1993):國語學(第二版)。台北:五南。
    饒蓓蕙(1994):兒童語音回路與新字彙學習。國立中正大學心理系碩士論文(未出版)。
    Abt Associates. (1977). Education as experimentation: a planned variation model: Vol. IVB. Effects of follow-through models. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Abt Books.
    Adams, G., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 20 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
    Anderson, R. C., Li, W., Ku, Y. M., Shu, H., & Wu, N. (2003). Use of partial information in learning to read Chinese characters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 52-57.
    Badian, N. A. (1997). Dyslexia and the double deficit hypothesis. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 69-87.
    Becker, C. A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 556-566.
    Becker, W., & Carnine, D. (1981). Direct Instruction: A behavior theory model for comprehensive educational intervention with the disadvantaged. In S. Bijon (Ed.), Contributions of behavior modification in education (pp. 1-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
    Benner, G. J., Kinder, D., Beaudoin, K. M., Stein, M. (2005). The effects of the “Corrective Reading Decoding” program on the basic reading skills and social adjustment of students with high-incidence disabilities. Journal of Direct Instruction, 5(1), 67-80.
    Bereiter, C., & Kurland, M. (1981-82). A constructive look at Follow Through results. Interchange, 12, 1-22.
    Bowers, P. G. (1993). Text reading and rereading: Determinants of fluency beyond word recognition. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 133-153.
    Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 5(1), 69-85.
    Bradford, S., Shippen, M. E., Alberto, P., Houchin, D. E., Flores, M. (2006). Using systemic instruction to teach decoding skills to middle school students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education & Training in Developmental Disabilities, 4(4). 333-343.
    Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read-a causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-421.
    Brown, I. S., & Felton, R. H. (1990). Effects in children at risk for reading disability. Reading and Writing: an Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 223-241.
    Carnine, D. W. (1977). Phonics versus look-say: Transfer to new words. Reading Teachers, 30, 636-640.
    Carnine, D., Silbert, J., & Kameenui, E. J. (1997). Direct instruction reading (3rd ed.). NY: Merrill.
    Catts, H. W., & Hogan, T. P. (2003). Language basis of reading disabilities and implications for early identification and Remediation. Reading Psychology, 24, 223-246.
    Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Fey, M. E. (2003). Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading-related abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36,(2), 151-164.
    CEC. (2006). Evidence-Based practice -- wanted, needed, and hard to get, CEC Today current issue. Retrieved July 20, 2006, from http://www.cec.sped.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&CONTENTID=6515&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm.
    Chan, C. K. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). Phonological processing in reading Chinese among normally achieving and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 223-243.
    Chan, L. (1990). Preschool children's understanding of Chinese writing. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of London, London.
    Chan, L. (1996). Children learn to read and write Chinese analytically. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy, Institute of Education. University of London, London.
    Chan, L., & Louie, L. (1992). Developmental trend of Chinese preschool children in drawing and writing. Journal of Research Childhood Education, 6, 93-99.
    Chan, L., & Nunes, T. (1998). Children's understanding of the formal and functional characteristics of written Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 115-131.
    Chen, Y. P. (1993). Word recognition and reading in Chinese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford, England.
    Cho, J. R., & Chen, H. C. (1999). Orthographic and phonological activation in the semantic processing of Korean Hanja and Hangul. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14(5/6), 481-502.
    Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Chomsky, N. (2002). On Nature and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres
    Clark, D. B., & Uhry, J. K. (1995). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). Baltimore: York Press.
    Cole, K. N., Dale, P. S., Mills, P. E., Jenkin, J. R. (1993). Interaction between early intervention curricula and student characteristics. Exceptional Children, 60(1), 17-28.
    Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading task. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 112-174). New York: Academic Press.
    Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369-390.
    Daly III, E. J., Chafouleas, S., & Skinner, C. H. (2005). Interventions for reading problems: design and evaluating effective strategies. NY: The Guilford Press.
    Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualising the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. B. Gough & L. C. Ehri & R.Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116-125.
    Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge in essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3-40). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Englemann, S. (1980). Direct Instruction. N.J.: Englewood Cliffs.
    Englemann, S., Becker, W. C., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (1988). The direct instruction follow through model: Design and outcomes. Education & Treatment of Children, 11(4), 303-317.
    Englemann, S., & Bruner, E. (1974). DISTAR reading I. Chicago IL: Science Research Associates.
    Englemann, S., Meyer, G. Johnson, C., & Carnine, L. (1999). Corrective Reading Skill Applications, Decoding. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
    Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J., & Schatschneider, C. (1998). The role in learning to read: preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 37-35.
    Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257-287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    Frith, U. (Ed.). (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. London: Erlbaum.
    Gersten, R. (1984). Follow Through revisted: Reflections on the site variability issue. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6, 411-423.
    Gersten, R., Becker, W., Heiry, T., & White. (1984). Entry IQ and yearly academic growth in children in Direct Instruction programs: A longitudinal study of low SES children. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(2), 109-121.
    Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.
    Goodman, K. S. Strauss, S. L. & Altwerger, B. (2007). New development in neuroscience and their implications for the theory and classroom practice of reading. Paper presented at the 15th European conference on reading, Berlin, Germany.
    Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Gough, P. B., & Tumer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading , and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6-10.
    Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C., & Treiman, R. (Eds.). (1992). Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    Gunn, B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 90-103.
    He, Y., Wang, Q., Anderson, R. C. (2005). Chinese children’s use of subcharacter information about pronunciation. Journal of Education Psychology, 97(4), 572-579.
    Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J., Sears, C. R., & Ogawa, T. (1998). The effects of polysemy for Japanese Katakana word. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 395-424.
    Ho, C. S.-H., & Bryant, P. (1997a). Learning to read Chinese beyond the logographic phase. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(3), 276-289
    Ho, C. S.-H., & Bryant, P. (1997b). Phonological skills are important in learning to read Chinese. Developmental Psychology, 33, 946-951.
    Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W. -O., Lee, S.-H., Tsang, S.-M., & Luan, V. H. (2004). Cognitive profiling and preliminary subtyping in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 9, 43-75
    Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W.-O., Tsang, S.-M., & Lee, S.-H. (2002). The cognitive profile and multiple-deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 543-553.
    Ho, C. S.-H., & Lai, D. N.-C. (2000). Naming-speed deficits and phonological memory deficits in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(2), 173-186.
    Ho, C. S. J., Law, T. P. S., & Ng, P. M. (2000). The phonological deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 57-79.
    Ho, C. S.-H., Yau, P. W.-Y., & Au, A. (2003). Development of orthographic knowledge and its relationship with reading and spelling among Chinese kindergarten and primary school children. In C. McBride-Chang & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading development in Chinese children (pp. 37-50). London: Praeger.
    Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relatively: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    House, E. R., Glass, G. V., McLean, L. D, & Walkers, B. (1978). No simple answer: critique of the Follow Through evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 128-160.
    Hsuan, C.-H. (2004). The relationship between Chinese phonological awareness and Chinese character reading, vocabulary reading, and oral vocabulary knowledge in 7.5-year-old children in Taiwan, Poster Conference of Institute of Education, University of London. London.
    Hsuan, C.-H. (2006). How Chinese children use phonological information learning to read Chinese characters. Paper presented at the International conference on multicultural learning and media literacy in the modern world, Hameenlinna, Finland.
    Hsuan, C. –H. (2007). The development of reading in Chinese character and Chinese word from 7 to 8 years old. Paper presented at The 15th European Conference on Reading. At Berlin, Germany.
    Hu, C.-F., & Catts, H. W. (1998). The role of phonological processing in early reading ability: what we can learn from Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(1), 55-79.
    Huang, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (1994). Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English. Cognition, 54, 73-98.
    Huang, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (1997). A longitudinal study of phonological awareness, visual skills, and Chinese reading acquisition among first-graders in Taiwan. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 20(2), 249-268.
    Hue, C.-W. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. In H.-C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language Processing in Chinese (pp. 93-107). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    International Dyslexia Association (2003). Definition of dyslexia. Retrieved from http://www.interdys.org/fact%20sheets/Definition%20N.pdf.
    Jackson, N. E., & Coltheart, M. (2001). Routes to reading success and failure-toward an integrated cognitive psychology of atypical reading. New York: Psychology Press.
    Krzanowski, W. J., & Marriott, F. H. C. (1995). Multivariate analysis. London: E. Arnold.
    Lee, L.-J. (1989). Emergent literacy in Chinese: print awareness of young children in Taiwan. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, The University of Arizona.
    Lemoine, H. E., Levy, B. A., & Hutchinson, A. (1993). Increasing the naming speed of poor readers: Representations formed across repetitions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 297-328.
    Leong, C. K. (1999). Phonological and morphological processing in adult students with learning/reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(3), 224-238.
    Leong, C. K., & Joshi, R. M. (Eds.). (1997). Cross-language studies of learning to read and spell: Phonologic and orthographic processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Leong, C. K., & Tamaoka, k. (1998). Cognitive processing of Chinese characters, words, sentences and Japanese kanji and kana: An introduction. Reading and writing: an interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/4), 155-164.
    Lesch, M. F., & Pollitt, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 285-294.
    Li, L. (2002). The role of phonology in reading Chinese single characters and two-character words with high, medium and low phonological regularities by Chinese grade 2 and grade 5 students. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(4), 372-374.
    Lingo, A. S., & Slaton, D. B., Jolivette, K. (2006). Effects of corrective reading on the reading abilities and classroom behaviors of middle school students with reading deficits and challenging behavior. Behavioral Disorder, 31(3), 265-283.
    Liu, I. M. (1984). Recognition of fagment-detected characters and words. Computer Processing of Chinese & Oriental Language, 1, 276-287.
    Lovett, M. W., Bordn, S. L., DeLuca, T., Lacerenza, L., Benson, N. J., & Brackstone, D. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: evidence of transfer of learning after phonologically-and strategy-based reading training programs. Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 805-822.
    Lovett, M. W., Warren-Chaplin, P. M., Ransby, M. J., & Borden, S. L. (1990). Training the word recognition skills of reading disabled children: treatment and transfer effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 769-780..
    Martella,, R. N., Martella, R. C., Kolts, R. L., Mitchell, D., & Mitchell, C. (2006). Effects of Three-Tire Model of intensifying instruction using a research-based core reading program in grades K-3. Journal of Direct Instruction, 6(1), 49-72.
    Masonheimer, P. E., Drum, P. A., & Ehri, L. C. (1984). Does environmental print identification lead children into word reading? Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 257-271.
    McBride-Chang, C. (2004). Children's literacy development. London: Arnold.
    McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
    McGraw Hill SRA (2007). Direct Instruction-Corrective Reading. Retrieved from http://mcgraw-hill.co.uk/sra/correctivereading.htm
    Meyer, L. A. (1984). Long-term academic effects of the direct instruction Project Follow Through evaluation. Elementary School Journal, 84, 380-394.
    Meyer, L. A., Gersten, R., & Gutkin. (1983). Direct Instruction: A Project Follow Through success story in an inner- city school. Elementary School Journal, 84, 241-252.
    Morita, A., & Matsuda, F. (2000). Phonological and semantic activation in reading two-kanji compound words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 487-503.
    Morton, J. (1968). Grammar and computation in language behavior. In J. C. Catford (Ed.), Studies in language and language behavior (Vol. VI). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
    Morton, J. (1970). A functional model for memory. In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press.
    Morton, J. (1979). Word recognition. In J. Morton & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Psycholinguistics series 2: structures and processes (Vol. 2, pp. 107-156). London: Elek.
    Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Olsson, J. (2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 289-307.
    Packard, J. L., Chen, X., Li, W., Wu, X., Gaffney, J. S., Li, H., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Explicit instruction in orthographic structure and word morphology helps Chinese children learn to write characters. Reading and Writing, 19, 457-487.
    Perfetti, C. A. (1991). Representations and awareness in the acquisition of reading competence. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 33-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Perfetti, C. A., Bell, L., & Delaney, S. (1988). Automatic phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 59-70.
    Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L.-H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in visual Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 101-118.
    Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1991). Phonological processes in reading Chinese words. Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 633-643.
    Prinzmetal, W. (1992). The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 473-484.
    Przychodzin-Havis, A. M., Marchand-Martella, N. E., Martella, R. C., Miller, D. A., Warner, L., Leonard, B., & Chapman, S. (2005). An analysis of “Corrective Reading” research. Journal of Direct Instruction, 5(1), 37-65.
    Rosenshine, B. V. (1986). Synthesis of research on explicit teaching. Educational Leadership, 43, 60-69.
    Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
    Scarlato, M. C., & Erin, A. (2004). Effects of “Corrective Reading” in a residential treatment facility for adjudicated youth. Journal of Direct Instruction, 4(2), 211-217.
    Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing system. Cognition, 19, 1-30.
    Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
    Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Mencl, E., Fulbright, R., Skudlarski, P., Constable, T., Marchione, K., Fletcher, J., Lyon, G. R., & Gore, J. C. (2003). Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with development dyslexia. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 101-110.
    Shu, H., & Anderson, R. C. (1999). Learning to read Chinese: the development of metalinguistic awareness. In J. Wang & A. W. Inhoff & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: a cognitive analysis (pp. 1-19). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Shu, H., Anderson, R. C., & Wu, N. (2000). Phonetic awareness: knowledge of orthographic-phonology relationships in the character acquisition of Chinese children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 56-62.
    Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74(1), 27-47.
    Shu, I. R., & Liu, I. M. (1996). Word and character superiority effects in Chinese. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 38, 11-30.
    Siok, W. T., & Fletcher, P. (2001). The role of phonological awareness and visual-orthographic skills in Chinese reading acquisition. Developmental Psychology,, 37(6), 886-899.
    Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia (Vol. 2nd). Oxford, England: Balckwell.
    Spear-Swerling, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). The road not taken: an integrative theoretical model of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 97-103.
    Stainthorp, R. (2003). Phonology and learning to read. In N. Hall & J. Larson & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 209-221). London: SAGE.
    Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
    Stein, M., Carnine, D., & Dixon, R. (1998). Direct Instruction: integrating curriculum design and effective teaching practice. Intervention in School and Clinic. 33(4). 227-234.
    Strong, A. C., Wehby, J. H., Falk, K. B., Lane, K. L. (2004). The impact of a structured reading curriculum and repeated reading on the performance of junior high students with emotional and behavioral disorders. School Psychology Review, 33(4), 561-581.
    Stuart, M. (2002). Using the dual-route cascade model as a framework for considering reading development. In R. Stainthorp & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Learning and teaching reading (pp. 45-60). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
    Sue, I. R., & Liu, I. M. (1996). Word and character superiority effects in Chinese. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 38, 11-30.
    Swanson, T. J., Hodson, B. W., & Schommer-Akins, M. (2005). An examination of phonological awareness treatment outcomes for seventh-grade poor readers from a bilingual community. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(4), 336-345.
    Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1995). The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: a Chinese study. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 293-316). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
    Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1997a). Submorphemic processing in Chinese. Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 761-775.
    Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1997b). Using masked priming to examine lexical storage of Chinese compound words. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    Tan, L.-H., Hoosain, R., & Peng, D.-L. (1995). Role of presemantic phonological code in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 43-54.
    Taylor, L., & Taylor, M. M. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York: Academic Press.
    Thaler, V., Ebner, E. M., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (2004). Training reading fluency in dysfluent readers with high reading accuracy: word specific effects but low transfer to untrained words. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(1), 89-115.
    Togesen, J. K., Myers, K., Schirm, A., Stuart, E., Vartivarian, S., Mansfield, W., Stancavage, F.,Durno, D., Javorsky, R., Hann, C. (2006). National assessment of title I: interim report. Volume II: closing the reading gap: first year findings from a randomized trial of four reading interventions for striving readers. U.S. Department of Education: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
    Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindammod, P., & Conway, T. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 579-593.
    Tsai, K.-C., & Nunes, T. (2003). The role of character schema in learning novel Chinese characters. In C. McBride-Chang & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading development in Chinese children (pp. 109-126). London: Praeger.
    Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Wang, W. S. Y. (1977). Speech recoding in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Memory and Language, 3, 621-630.
    Vellutino, F. R. (1979). Dyslexia: Research and theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D.M., & Lyon, G.R. (2000). Differentiation between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(3), 223-238.
    Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 601-638.
    Walker, B., Shippen, m. E., Alberto, P., Houchins, D. E., Cihak, D. F. (2006). Using the “Expressive writing” program to improve the writing skills of high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Direct Instruction, 6(1), 35-47.
    Watson, C., & Willows, D. M. (1993). Evidence for a visual processing deficit subtype among disabled readers. In D. M. Willows & R. S. Kruk & E. Corcos (Eds.), Visual processes in reading and reading disabilities (pp. 287-309). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Wise, B., & Olson, R. K. (1995). Computer-based phonological awareness and reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 99-122.
    Wolf, M. (1997). A provisional, integrative account of phonological and naming-speed deficits in dyslexia: implications for diagnosis and intervention. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia (pp. 67-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Wolf, M, & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The Double-Deficit hypothesis for developmental dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 415-438.
    Wolf, M., Bower, P. G., & Biddle, B. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading, a conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 387-407.
    Zhang, W. T., Feng, L., & He, H. D. (1994). The activation of phonological and semantic information in Chinese character recognition. In H.-W. Chang & C.-W. Huang & C.-W. Hue & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Advanced in the study of Chinese language processing (pp. 185-198). Taiwan, Taipei: National Taiwan University.
    Zhou, Y. (1978). To what degree are the phonetics of present –day Chinese characters still phonetic? Zhongguo yuwen, 146, 172-177.
    Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999). Sublexical processing in reading Chinese. In J. Wang & A. W. Inhoff & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese Script: a cognitive analysis (pp. 37-63). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and cognitive processes, 14(5/6), 525-565.

    QR CODE