研究生: |
許艾薇 Tang, Ivy |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
莎士比亞女角的再現 - 以『前拉菲爾派』為例 Representation of Shakespeare’s Women in Pre-Raphaelite Art |
指導教授: |
陳學毅
Chen, Hsueh-I |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
歐洲文化與觀光研究所 Graduate Institute of European Cultures and Tourism |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 134 |
中文關鍵詞: | 莎士比亞 、女性 、維多莉亞時期 、前拉菲爾派 、奧菲莉亞 、米蘭達 、瑪莉安娜 |
英文關鍵詞: | Shakespeare's heroines, Victorians, Ophelia, Miranda, Mariana |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GECT.005.2018.A05 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:264 下載:55 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自從威廉‧莎士比亞的劇作(以下稱為莎劇)問世,它影響、激勵與啟發了許多它的讀者。尤其在維多莉亞時期,研究莎士比亞及莎劇成為了當代評論家、文學家、學者及藝術家之間的流行。也因此,在文藝繁榮的十九世紀時,許多關於莎劇的文章、書籍和藝術作品的再現被創造出來。但從另一個角度來看,與當時代社會的繁榮對比,女性在社會上的權利是相對受限的。她們受限於父權體制下的刻板印象、限制及束縛。與這個背景相連,莎劇中女性角色的人格、情緒、遭遇和象徵性強力底啟發了維多莉亞時代的讀著,尤其是藝文人士。在許多藝術家中,前拉菲爾派(Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood)尤其受到莎士比亞的女角吸引並繪畫出許多以她們為主題才的再現作品。由於前拉斐爾派專注於繪畫主題的強烈情感、珠寶般的色彩和近乎真實的自然風景,莎劇中的女角成為前拉菲爾派描繪景物複雜性的主題,並從中表達出他們的哲學、意識形態、視覺意涵。
本文著重在分析及探討維多莉亞時期的藝文人士如何重新構思和重現莎劇中的女性。從眾多莎劇女角中,本文將著重分析奧菲莉亞(Ophelia)、米蘭達(Miranda)及瑪莉安娜(Mariana)在維多利亞人眼中的象徵性和影響。在維多莉亞時期,這三位女角所代表的意識如下:奧菲莉亞與女性的瘋狂(female malady)、米蘭達與她那完美女兒的形象和瑪莉安娜所代表的孤獨。受到莎劇中女角啟發的繪畫及再現作品將會作為主要的研究案例及探討範圍。除此之外,本文中也會根據討論添加筆者的個人解釋及現代的觀點,助於探討維多莉亞時代中的這些女角是如何改變之後讀者對於這些女角的觀感及印象。
Shakespeare’s plays have inspired their readers ever since they were written. The study of Shakespeare became particularly popular during the Victorian era. Representations of the plays came to be much present in paintings, poems, and theatrical performances. From a different angle, women’s rights, unlike the prosperity of the era, were limited. They were framed under many patriarchal stereotypes. In this connection, Shakespeare’s women interested the critics, poets and painters. The topic of the women in Shakespearean plays is one of the most inspiring subjects for the Victorian artists, especially for the members of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. As the Pre-Raphaelites focused on their intention of painting subjects with jewel-like colors and detailed rendering of nature, Shakespeare’s plays became ideal subjects for artists to paint out the complexity of the scenery and symbolically illustrate their philosophies and ideologies.
This paper focuses on an analysis of how the women in Shakespeare’s plays are reimagined and rediscovered through the eyes of Victorian artists. Out of the many heroines in his works, Ophelia, Mariana and, Miranda are characters that present symbolic meanings and influences to the Victorian eyes. These three heroines represent the women’s status during the Victorian era as follows: Ophelia is connected with female malady (madness), Miranda with her image as the dutiful daughter, and Mariana with her isolation. Paintings and poems inspired by these women during the Victorian era will be discussed and used as prompts to strengthen the points. In each case, I will add interpretations building on current critical consensus in order to show how visions have changed from Victorian times to ours in relation to Shakespeare’s female characters selected in this thesis for discussion.
Bibliography
Andres, Sophia. The Pre-Raphaelite Art of the Victorian Novel: Narrative Challenges to Visual Gendered Boundaries. Ohio: Ohio State University Press, 2005.
Andrews, Wyndham Thomas, ed. Critics on Shakespeare: readings in literary criticism. London: G. Allen & Unwin, 1973.
Aristotle, Leon, and O. B. Golden. Aristotle's Poetics a Translation and Commentary for Students of Literature. New Jersey: Prentice-hall Inc., 1968.
Balestraci, Mary. Victorian voices: Gender ideology and Shakespeare's female characters. Diss. Northeastern University, 2012.
Barringer, Timothy John. Reading the Pre-Raphaelites. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
Benton, Michael, and Sally Butcher. “Painting Shakespeare.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 32.3 (1998): 53-66.
Blaikie, J A. “J W Waterhouse, ARA.” The Magazine of Art 9 (1886): 1-6.
Boos, Florence Saunders. “The Pre-Raphaelites.” Victorian Poetry 44.3 (2006): 364-375.
Boyd, John D. and Anne Williams. “Tennyson’s ‘Mariana’ and ‘Lyric Perspective.’” Studies in English in Literature, 1500-1900. Vol. 23, No.4 (1983): 579-593.
Burkhardt, Louis. “Spectator seduction: measure for measure.” Texas studies in literature and language 37.3 (1995): 236-263.
Burstyn, Joan N. Victorian Education and the Ideal of Womanhood. New Jersey: Croom Helm, 1980.
Butcher, Samuel Henry, ed. The poetics of Aristotle. New York: Macmillan, 1902.
Camden, Carroll. “On Ophelia’s Madness.” Shakespeare Quarterly 15 (1964): 247-255.
Campbell, Erin. “‘Sad Generations Seeking Water’: The Social Construction of Madness in O (phelia) and Q (uentin Compson).” Faulkner Journal 20.2 (2004): 53-70.
Cherry, Deborah, and Griselda Pollock. "Woman as sign in Pre‐Raphaelite literature: a study of the representation of Elizabeth Siddall." Art History 7.2 (1984): 206-227.
Clarke, Charles Cowden. Shakespeare-characters; Chiefly Those Subordinate. New York: Ams Press Inc., 1863.
Clarke, Mary Cowden. The Girlhood of Shakespeare's Heroines: In a Series of Tales. Vol. 1. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
---. The Girlhood of Shakespeare's Heroines: In a Series of Tales. Vol. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
---. The Girlhood of Shakespeare's Heroines: In a Series of Tales. Vol. 3. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Clifford, David, and Laurence Roussillon, eds. Outsiders looking in: the Rossettis then and now. London: Anthem Press, 2004.
Cogeval, Guy, and Beatrice Avanzi, eds. Drama and Desire: Art and Theatre from the French Revolution to the First World War. Milano: Skira, 2010.
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Coleridge's criticism of Shakespeare: a selection. Ed. R. A. Foakes, London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 1989.
Dane, Gabrielle. “Reading Ophelia's Madness.” Exemplaria 10.2 (1998): 405-423.
Dickens, Charles. Hard times. Peterborough: Broadview Press, 1996.
Dusinberre, Juliet. Shakespeare and the Nature of Women. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1996.
Eastman, Arthur M. A Short History of Shakespearean Criticism. New York: Random House, 1968.
Eliot, George. Daniel Deronda. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Edition, 1996.
Foucault, Michel, and Jay Miskowiec. “Of other spaces.” diacritics 16.1 (1986): 22-27.
French, A. L. Shakespeare and the Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Frisch, Erin. “Pre-Raphaelite Painting and the Medieval Woman.” Art and Art History Honors Theses. (2013).
Funk, Anna Olivia. “William Holman Hunt and the Pre-Raphaelites: Artistic Aims, Worldview, and Influence on Nineteenth-Century Culture,” (2016). Honor Senior Theses/Projects. Paper 94.
Geckle, George L. “Coleridge on Measure for Measure.” Shakespeare Quarterly 18.1 (1967): 71-73.
Goodland, Katherine. Female Mourning in Medieval and Renaissance English Drama: From the Raising of Lazarus to King Lear. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.
Gunter, G. O. “Life and Death Symbols of Tennyson’s Mariana.” South Atlantic Bulletin. Vol. 36, No.3 (1971): 64-67.
Halliwell, Stephen. The Poetics of Aristotle: translation and commentary. North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.
Hankey, Julie. “Victorian Portias: Shakespeare's Borderline Heroine.” Shakespeare Quarterly 45.4 (1994): 426-488.
Hares-Stryker, Carolyn, ed. An Anthology of Pre-Raphaelite Writings. New York: New York University Press, 1997.
Heeney, Tom. “Henry Johnstone's Anagnorisis: Argumentum ad Hominem as tragic trope of truth.” Philosophy & Rhetoric (1995): 388-404.
Hewison, Robert, Ian Warrell, and Stephen Wildman. Ruskin, Turner and the Pre-Raphaelites. London: Tate Gallery, 2000.
Hoakley, “The Story in Paintings: Philip Hermogenes Calderon 2, Shakespeare and the naked saint.” The Eclectic Light Company. World Press, 10 October 2016. Web. 25 April 2018. https://eclecticlight.co/2016/10/10/the-story-in-paintings-philip-hermogenes-calderon-2-shakespeare-and-the-naked-saint/.
Hobson, Anthony. J. W. Waterhouse. Oxford: Phaidon-Christie’s Limited, 1989.
---. The Art and Life of JW Waterhouse, RA, 1849-1917. New York: Macmillan Publishing, 1980.
House, Humphry. Aristotle's Poetics. London: Rupert Hart-Davis Ltd, 1956.
Hulea, Lavinia. “Pre-Raphaelites Painting Shakespeare’s Women.” Gender Studies 11 (2012): 126-134.
---. “Two Instances of Reversed Ekphrasis: Waterhouse’s Miranda and Millais’s Ferdinand Lured by Ariel.” Journal of Romanian Literary Studies, Issue 12 (2017): 345-350.
---. “Waterhouse’s Ophelia–a reversed ekphrastic approach of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.” Journal of Romanian Literary Studies, Issue 9 (2016): 259-262.
Hunt, William Holman. Pre-Raphaelitism and the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. Vol.1. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
---. Pre-Raphaelitism and the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. Vol.2. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Ingram, John Henry, Oliver Madox Brown, A Biographical Sketch. London: Elliot Stock, 1883. Web. 10 March 2018. https://archive.org/details/cu31924013441625
Jameson, Anna. Shakespeare’s Heroines: Characteristics of Women-Moral, Poetical, and Historical. London: G. Bell, 1913.
Lamb, Charles, and Mary Lamb. Tales from Shakespeare. London: Penguin, 2007.
Laporte, Charles. “The Bard, the Bible, and the Victorian Shakespeare Question.” ELH 74.3 (2007): 609-628.
Leng, Andrew. “Millais’s ‘Mariana’: Literary Painting, the Pre Raphaelite Gothic, and the Iconology of Marian Artist.” The Journal of Pre-Raphaelite and Aesthetic Studies 1 (1988): 63-74.
Leverenz, David. “The Woman in Hamlet: An Interpersonal View.” Signs 4.2 (1978):
291-308.
Liao, Pei-Chen. “The ‘Perfect’ Woman in the Tempest: A Comparative Deconstruction of Miranda.” NTU Studies in Language and Literature 19 (2008): 81-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.6153/2008.19.04
Limpár, Ildikó. “Shakespeare's Miranda: angelic or demonic?” Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies (HJEAS) 9.1 (2003): 53-60.
Lin, Guijuan. “Higher education research methodology-literature method.” International Education Studies 2.4 (2009): 179-181.
Lockyer, Sharon. “Textual analysis.” The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (2008): 865-867.
Ludwig, Kirk. “Proxy agency in collective action.” Noûs 48.1 (2014): 75-105.
MacBeth, George. “Subliminal Dreams.” In Narrative Art: Art News Annual 36, ed. T. Hess and J. Ashberry. New York: Macmillan, 1970.
John MacFarlane, “Aristotle's definition of Anagnorisis.” American Journal of Philology 121.3(2000): 367-383.
Marsh, Jan. Pre-Raphaelite Women: Images of Femininity in Pre-Raphaelite Art. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1987.
Marshall, Gail, ed. Jameson, Cowden Clarke, Kemble, Cushman: Great Shakespeareans. Vol. 7. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2011.
---. Shakespeare and Victorian Women. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
---. ed. Shakespeare in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Marshall, Gail, and Adrian Poole, eds. Victorian Shakespeare. Vol.1. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
---. Victorian Shakespeare. Vol.2. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
Millais, John Guille. The Life and Letters of Sir John Everett Millais. London: Methuen, 1899.
Orgel, Stephen. “Prospero's wife.” Representations 8 (1984): 1-13.
Palfrey, Simon and Emma Smith. Shakespeare’s Dead. Oxford: Bodleian Library, 2016.
Pandit, Lalita. “Emotion, perception and anagnorisis in the comedy of errors: A cognitive perspective.” College Literature 33.1 (2006): 94-126.
Parker, Rozsika. The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine. New York: IB Tauris, 2010.
Poole, Adrian. Shakespeare and the Victorians. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2004.
Poulson, Christine. “A checklist of Pre-Raphaelite illustrations of Shakespeare's Plays.” The Burlington Magazine 122.925 (1980): 244-250.
Prince, Kathryn. “Illustration, Text, and Performance in Early Shakespeare for Children,” Borrows and Lenders 2, No. 2 (2006), 1-15.
---. Shakespeare in Victorian Periodicals, New York: Routledge, 2008, 39.
Raby, Peter. Fair Ophelia: A Life of Harriet Smithson Berlioz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Rhodes, Kimberly. Ophelia and Victorian Visual Culture: Representing Body Politics in Nineteenth Century. New York: Routledge, 2017.
Rosenfeld, Jason. John Everett Millais. New York: Phaidon Press, 2012.
Ruskin, John. “Of Queen’s Garden.” Sesame and Lilies. The Work of John Ruskin. 39 vols. Ed. E. T. Cook and Alexander Wedderburn. London: Allen, 1905. Vol. 18: 109-144.
---. The Works of John Ruskin. Vol. 280. London: G. Allen, 1903.
Russell, Anne E. “‘History and Real Life’: Anna Jameson, Shakespeare's Heroines and Victorian Women.” Victorian Review 17.2 (1991): 35-49.
Salkeld, Duncan. Madness and Drama in the Age of Shakespeare. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1993.
Sawyer, Robert. Victorian Appropriations of Shakespeare: George Eliot, AC Swinburne, Robert Browning, and Charles Dickens. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2003.
Stavinsky, Aron Y. Shakespeare and the Victorians: roots of modern criticism. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1969.
Sdegno, Emma. “Shakespeare and Victorian Essayism:‘A Note of Provinciality’” Paper Bullets of the Brain: Experiments with Shakespeare 12 (2006): 111-124.
Shakespeare, William. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. New York: Race Point Publishing, 2014.
Sillars, Stuart. Shakespeare and the Victorians. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Slights, Jessica. "Rape and the Romanticization of Shakespeare's Miranda." SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 41.2 (2001): 357-379.
Smyser, William Emory. “Romanticism in Tennyson and His Pre-Raphaelite Illustrators.” The North American Review 192.659 (1910): 504-515.
Styan, John Louis. The Shakespeare Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Stone, Donald. "Pre-Raphaelite lives." Sewanee Review 112 (2004): xciii-xcvi.
Sturgiss, Marie H. “Shakspere’s Miranda.” The Shakespeare Association Bulletin 11 (1935): 36-44.
Swinburne, Algernon Charles. A Study of Shakespeare. London: Chatto & Windus, 1880.
Taylor, Gary. Reinventing Shakespeare: a cultural history, from the Restoration to the present. New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1989.
Thompson, Ann and Sasha Roberts, eds. Women reading Shakespeare, 1660-1900: an anthology of criticism. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.
Tucker Jr, Herbert F. “Tennyson and the Measure of Doom.” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (1983): 8-20.
Upstone, Robert, ed. The Pre-Raphaelite Dream: Paintings & Drawings from the Tate Collection. London: Tate Gallery, 2003.
Villar, José María Mesa. “Musings from Ophelia’s Watery Voyage: Images of Female Submission in Shakespeare’s and Millais’ Drowning Maiden.” Sederi 14 (2004): 227-237.
Wechsler, Judith. “Performing Ophelia: The iconography of madness.” Theatre Survey 43.2 (2002): 201-221.
Wilde, Oscar and Ed. Donald L. Lawler. The Picture of Dorian Gray. New York: Norton, 1987.
Wildman, Stephen, Jan Marsh, and John Christian. Visions of Love and Life: Pre-Raphaelite Art from the Birmingham Collection, England. Virginia: Art Services Intl, 1995.
Wood, Christopher, and Paul Delifer. The Pre-Raphaelites. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1981.