隨著庇護性就業者年齡提升，其身體機能和障礙狀況可能隨之改變，同時，他們的父母也進入老年階段，形成「雙重老化」家庭。這樣的情況使得生涯規劃變得至關重要，過去研究發現家屬對於庇護性就業者生涯轉銜規劃較少，且經常感到焦慮。本研究以不確定性隨機變化模式為基礎，探討庇護性就業者家屬對於生涯轉銜資源的了解程度及協助庇護性就業者生涯轉銜規劃的情況，以了解庇護性就業者生涯轉銜資源對家屬協助庇護性就業者進行生涯規劃的影響，並建構家屬資源了解程度對生涯轉銜規劃的影響模式。
本研究以問卷調查法進行，問卷係參考相關文獻後編制，包含「家屬對庇護性就業者生涯轉銜資源了解程度」、「家屬對庇護性就業者生涯轉銜資源規劃程度」、「家屬對於庇護性就業者生涯轉銜的不確定程度」、「家屬對於庇護性就業者生涯轉銜的焦慮程度」。邀請台北市及新北市28間庇護工場之就業者家屬填寫，回收202份有效問卷。透過SPSS 26與AMOS 23執行結構方程模式分析及驗證，得到下列研究結果：
一、家屬對生涯轉銜各向度資源了解及規劃程度薄弱。
二、不同家屬關係、教育程度之家屬對生涯轉銜資源了解程度有差異。
三、不同家屬關係、教育程度、庇護性就業者工作內容之家屬對生涯轉銜資源規劃程度有差異。
四、家屬對生涯轉銜資源的了解程度會提升其規劃程度。
五、健康資源了解程度的提升會增加生涯轉銜的不確定感及焦慮感。
六、社會資源規劃程度的提升會減少生涯轉銜的不確定感。
文末本研究根據研究結果提出相關建議，包括：專業人員應提早協助家屬了解庇護性就業者的生涯特性及需求，並提供生涯轉銜資源；政府應建立資源宣導的管道和增加資源的可及性。未來研究建議進行介入性研究，聚焦中高齡庇護性就業者家屬，此外，可以納入家屬個人特質及經驗對庇護性就業者生涯轉銜的影響，並使用重復量數分析深入探討資源了解及規劃程度的變化。

As the age of disabled employees in sheltered workshops increases, their physical function and disability conditions may change accordingly. And at the same time, their parents are also entering the elderly stage, creating a “double aging” family issue. Such a situation makes career planning of disabled employees in sheltered workshops crucially important. Previous studies have indicated that family members are less involved in career transition planning of disabled employees in sheltered workshops and often experience anxiety. This study is based on the entropy model of uncertainty and explores the understanding of career transition resources by family members of disabled employees in sheltered workshops and their involvement in assisting disabled employees with career transition planning. In order to understand the impact of family members' awareness of career transition resources for sheltered employees on their assistance in career planning and to construct a model that illustrates the impact of family members' resource awareness on career transition planning.
This study employed a questionnaire survey method, and the questionnaire was developed based on relevant literature. It includes sections on "Family members' understanding of career transition resources for disabled employees", "Family members' involvement in career transition resource planning for disabled employees", "Family members' perceived uncertainty about disabled employees’ career transitions ", and "Family members' anxiety levels regarding disabled employees’ career transitions ". This study invited family members of employees from 28 sheltered workshops in Taipei City and New Taipei City to complete the questionnaire, resulting in 202 valid responses. By conducting structural equation modeling analysis and validation using SPSS 26 and AMOS 23, the following research results were obtained:
1. Family members have a weak understanding of various dimensions of career transition resources and their planning levels.
2. There are differences in the level of understanding of career transition resources among family members based on their different relationships and educational backgrounds.
3. There are differences in the level of involvement in career transition resource planning among family members based on their different relationships, educational backgrounds, and the nature of the disabled employee's job content in sheltered workshops.
4. The level of understanding of career transition resources among family members is positively associated with their level of involvement in career transition planning.
5. An increase in the level of understanding of health resources is associated with an increase in the perceived uncertainty and anxiety regarding career transitions.
6. An increase in the level of involvement in social resource planning is associated with a reduction in the perceived uncertainty regarding career transitions.
At the end of the study, based on the research findings, several recommendations are made, including:
1. Early assistance from professionals to help family members understand the career characteristics and needs of disabled employees in shelter workshops, along with the provision of career transition resources.
2. The government should establish channels for resource awareness and increase the accessibility of resources for the family members of disabled employees in shelter workshops.
For future research, it is suggested to conduct intervention studies, focusing on the family members of middle-aged and older f disabled employees in shelter workshops. Additionally, the study can incorporate the individual characteristics and experiences of family members in understanding the impact on the career transition of sheltered employees, and employ repeated measures analysis to delve deeper into the changes in resource awareness and planning levels.

中文參考文獻
王文宇、李淑容、楊培珊（2005）。台北市老人及身心障礙者財產信託制度之規劃（上）。法令月刊，56(3)，12-26。https://doi.org/10.6509/TLM.200503_56(3).0002
王文娟（2011）。智能障礙者雙老家庭壓力負荷之初探。身心障礙研究季刊，9(2)，96-110，http://dx.doi.org/10.30072/JDR.201106.0003
王國羽、楊亞麗（2003）。中老年身心障礙者安置轉銜機制規劃之研究: 以心智障礙者為例。內政部。
王國羽（2007）。居家中老年智障者的照顧問題：性別、居住安排與相關論述。身心障礙研究，5 (1)，1-29。
王顏和（2011）。國際機能、失能和健康分類。衛生署委託「國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統-兒童與青少年版推動計畫」。
中華民國信託業商業同業公會（2021）。身心障礙者財產信託服務現況。https://www.papmh.org.tw/newsletter/1139
行政院勞工委員會（2009）。身心障礙者庇護工場服務狀況調查報告。
李宗派（2007）。老化概念(II)行為科學之老化理論與老化理論研究趨勢。臺灣老人保健學刊，3(2)，25-61。
李宛真、賴陳秀慧（2021）。庇護性就業員工留任於庇護職場相關因素研究。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，36，47-66。https://doi.org/10.6308/JCPRC.202107_(36).0003
李崇信（2002）。身心障礙者與庇護工場之我見。就業安全，1(1)，64-69。
李雅慧、魏惠娟（2015）。低教育程度退休者的學習歷程之探索：轉化學習的觀點。高雄師大學報，39，25-47。
李藹慈（2019）。新退休典範：持續工作、終身學習。經濟部產業人才發展資訊網。https://www.italent.org.tw/ePaperD/9/ePaper20191000004
呂又慧、戴雅君（2011）。社區精神復健的另類服務：以新北市慈芳關懷中心的「會所模式」為例。社區發展季刊，136，308-327。
宋麗玉、施教裕（2009）。優勢觀點：社會工作理論與實務。洪葉文化。頁487-492。
林幸台（2019）。身心障礙者生涯輔導與轉銜服務（第二版）。心理出版社。
林昭吟、林季平（2004）。身心障礙者提前老化現象與健康照護需求之研究。內政部委託研究計畫編號093-000000AU631-001，台北內政部。https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/45037/1/RRPG930312.pdf
林昭吟、林季平、林祐誠、李浩然、劉曉融（2014）。身心障礙者提前老化現象與健康照護需求之研究。內政部委託研究報告。https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/45037/1/RRPG930312.pdf
林東隆、余嬪、陳武宗（2000）。退休規劃與生活適應之間—退休人員之退休生活經驗初探。社會發展季刊，132，278-293。
林嘉慧（2023）。高齡化趨勢對產業之影響與挑戰。經濟前瞻，206，47-51。
周怡君（2009）。從庇護工場功能特徵與經營特質探討。就業安全半年刊，8(1)，90-96。
吳明珠、鄭勝分（2012）。庇護工場轉型社會企業之研究。身心障礙研究季刊，10(2)，148-162。https://doi.org/10.30072/JDR.201206.0005
吳亭芳、邱滿艷、王得瑋（2022）。新北市庇護員工就業轉銜調查研究計畫（未出版）。新北市政府勞工局委託研究計畫編號TPLAB111006。
徐秀燕（2020）。身心障礙庇護工場執行成效評估(PG10906-0036)。勞動部勞動力發展署委託研究計畫。
高馨玲、任麗華（2005）。智能障礙者維持就業階段工作適應之探討—以三位中度智能障礙女性為例。特殊教育與復健學報，13，179-207。
陳小紅（2018）。庇護工場調查報告。監察院。
陳伶珠（2011）。雙重老化智能障礙者家庭照顧經驗初探。台灣高齡服務管理學刊，1(1)，138-165
陳政智、陳桂英、楊馥宣（2013）。年老照顧者將中高齡智能障礙者送至機構安養之考慮因素探討。聯合勸募論壇，2(2)，51-72。
陳政智、陳玠汝（2015）。我們必須面對的議題：智能障礙者及照顧者雙重老化衍生的需求。社區發展季刊，149，311-326。
陳政智、吳明宜、以容蓉、廖名喬、黃怡嘉（2020）。身心障礙者從庇護工場轉銜到轉銜到社政、醫療服務輔導工作手冊。勞動部勞動力發展署。
陳姿廷、吳慧菁、鄭懿之（2015）。臺灣精神障礙者手足照顧經驗之初探:以父母照顧經驗做對照。臺大社工學刊，31，55-103。
陳靜怡、李城忠（2021）。退休資源在退休生活中對幸福感和心理健康的影響。管理資訊計算，10(2)，217-226。http://dx.doi.org/10.6285/MIC.202109_10(2).0017
陳靜江（2006）。美國庇護工場興衰－對國內身心障礙者就業的啟示。就業安全半年刊，5(2)，88-93。
陳靜江、鈕文英（2008）。高中職階段身心障礙者轉銜能力評量表之編製。特殊教育研究學刊，33(1)，1-20。http://dx.doi.org/10.6172/BSE200803.3301001
黃珉蓉（2020）。社區式長期照顧機構 —身心障礙者日間照顧服務新選擇。中華民國智障者家長總會。https://www.papmh.org.tw/newsletter/890
張庭瑋（2008）。「甜蜜的負荷」?家庭對於中高齡智障家人的照顧轉銜（未出版之碩士論文）。臺灣大學社會科學院社會工作研究所碩士論文。
國發會人力發展處（2018）。中華民國人口推估（2018年至2065年）報告。國家發展委員會人口推估查詢系統。
國發會人力發展處（2018）。中華民國人口推估（2022年至2070年）報告。國家發展委員會人口推估查詢系統。
國際審查委員會（2017）。施行身心障礙者權利公約(CRPD)初次國家報告結論性意見。
國際審查委員會（2022）。（臺灣)關於《身心障礙者權利公約》(CRPD)的第二次國家報告結論性意見(初稿)。
潘淑滿（2000）。社會個案工作。心裡出版社。
彭康麟（2005）。決策不確定之衡量—Shannon熵之應用。明新學報，3，171-181。
葉庭嘉（2015）。我的鎏銀歲月─中高齡智能障礙者老化經驗與未來生活期待（未出版之碩士論文）。高雄醫學大學醫學社會學與社會工作學系碩士論文。
曾永清（2015）。教育程度、家庭所得對理財知識與理財行為路徑模式之探究。高雄師大學報，38，49-68。
臺北市立聯合醫院松德院區（2010）。社區職能工作坊。https://tpech.gov.taipei/mp109201/cp.aspx?n=89E853CB74B438F3
劉文於、王鐘賢、何靖雯（2013）。應用ICF架構探討智能障礙者的老化。物理治療，38(2)，126-136。
蔡妍妮（2016）。中高齡退休者的前瞻因應能力與活躍老化之研究。福祉科技與服務管理學刊，4(3)，377-388。https://doi.org/10.6283/JOCSG.2016.4.3.377
衛生福利部（2018）。中華民國106年「老人狀況調查報告」。衛生福利部。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-70607-5ecf9013-0a80-4ca1-9041-78e06beada4b.html
鍾國文（1998）。老人退休調適之研究，中原學報，26(4)，109~115。
薛承秦、曾敏傑（2002）。中高齡退休生涯規劃與影響因素之研究。勞資關係論叢，11，33-67。http://dx.doi.org/10.29902/JCSTVS.200211.0002
謝依臻（2020）。遇見後天家人:參與支持團體的心智障礙者成年一般手足之壓力調適探究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文。
英文參考文獻
Adams, G. A., & Rau, B. L. (2011). Putting off tomorrow to do what you want today: planning for retirement. American Psychologist, 66(3), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022131
Bigby, C. (1997). Later life for adults with intellectual disability: A time of opportunity and vulnerability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 22(2), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668259700033331
Bigby, C. (2008). Beset by obstacles: A review of Australian policy development to support ageing in place for people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 33(1), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250701852433

Brzozek, C., Benke, K. K., Zeleke, B. M., Abramson, M. J., & Benke, G. (2018). Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation and memory performance: Sources of uncertainty in epidemiological cohort studies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(4), 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040592
Buhr, K., & Dugas, M. J. (2002). The intolerance of uncertainty scale: Psychometric properties of the English version. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 931-945. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00092-4
Cumming, E., Dean, L. R., Newell, D. S., & McCaffrey, I. (1960). Disengagement-a tentative theory of aging. Sociometry, 23(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786135
Dague, B. (2012). Sheltered employment, sheltered lives: Family perspectives of conversion to community-based employment, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 37, 1-11.
Engeland, J., Kittelsaa, A., & Langballe, E. M. (2018). How do people with intellectual disabilities in Norway experience the transition to retirement and life as retirees? Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 20(1), 72–81. http://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.411
Fesko, S. L., Hall, A. C., Quinlan, J., & Jockell, C. (2012). Active aging for individuals with intellectual disability: Meaningful community participation through employment, retirement, service, and volunteerism. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117(6), 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-117-6.497
Hirsh, J. B., Mar, R. A., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). Psychological entropy: A framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety. Psychological Review, 119(2), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026767
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307
Hsu, T. H., Huang, Y. T., & Ososkie, J. (2009). Challenges in transition from sheltered workshop to competitive employment: Perspective of Taiwan social enterprise transition specialists, Journal of Rehabilitation, 75(4), 19-26.
Joo, S. H., & Grable, J. (2001). Factors associated with seeking and using professional retirement‐planning help. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 30, 37 - 63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X01301002.
Judge, J., Walley, R., Anderson, B., & Young, R. (2010). Activity, aging, and retirement: The views of a group of Scottish people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 7(4), 295–301.
Kimiyagahlam, F., Safari, M., & Mansori, S. (2019). Influential behavioral factors on retirement planning behavior: The case of Malaysia. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 30(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1891/1052-3073.30.2.244
Ladouceur, R., Gosselin, P., & Dugas, M. J. (2000). Experimental manipulation of intolerance of uncertainty: A study of a theoretical model of worry. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 933–941.
Leung, C. S. Y., & Earl, J. K. (2012). Retirement resources inventory: Construction, factor structure and psychometric properties. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.06.005
Lifshitz, H., & Merrick, J. (2003). Ageing and intellectual disability in Israel: A study to compare community residence with living at home. Health & Social Care in the Community, 11(4), 364-371.
Lyon, B. K., & Popov, G. (2022). On the concept of risk, uncertainty & black swans. Prof. Safety, 67, 18–23.
Lyster, K. (2017). Looking forward to the future: Supporting individuals with developmental disabilities as they age. Community Living British Columbia. https://www.communitylivingbc.ca/wp-content/uploads/Looking-Forward-To-The-Future.pdf
Lysaght, R., Ouellette-Kuntz, H., & Morrison, C. (2009). Meaning and value of productivity to adults with intellectual disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(6), 413–424.
Murshed, R., & Uddin, M. R. (2019). Parental education and schooling choice: An empirical study from Bangladesh. Bangladesh Development Studies, 42(1), 77–105. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27031154
Nam, Y., Loibl, C. (2021). Financial capability and financial planning at the verge of retirement Age. Journal of Family and Economic Issues ,42 , 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-020-09699-4
Oppewal, A., Hilgenkamp, T. I., van Wijck, R., Schoufour, J. D., & Evenhuis, H. M. (2014). The predictive value of physical fitness for falls in older adults with intellectual disabilities. Research in developmental disabilities, 35(6), 1317–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.022
Petkoska, J., & Earl, J. K. (2009). Understanding the influence of demographic and psychological variables on retirement planning. Psychology and Aging, 24(1), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014096
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2022). World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. UNDESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 3.
Schumacher, K. L., Jones, P. S., & Meleis, A. I. (1999). Helping elderly persons in transition: A framework for research and practice. In E. A. Swanson & T. Tripp-Reimer (Eds.), Life transitions in the older adult: Issues for nurses and other health professionals (pp. 1-26). New York: Springer.
Stancliffe, R. J., Nye-Lengerman, K. M., & Kramme, J. E. D. (2019). Aging, community-based employment, mobility impairment, and retirement: national core indicators–adult consumer survey data. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(4), 251–266.
Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 282-298.
Wang M. (2007). Profiling retirees in the retirement transition and adjustment process: examining the longitudinal change patterns of retirees' psychological well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.455
Wang, M., & Shi, J. (2014). Psychological research on retirement. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115131
Wang, M., & Shultz, K. S. (2010). Employee retirement: A review and recommendations for future investigation. Journal of Management, 36(1), 172-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309347957
Wang, M., Henkens, K., & van Solinge, H. (2011). A review of theoretical and empirical advancements. American Psychologist, 66(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022414
World Health Organization. (2002). Active ageing: A policy framework. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/67215
Yeung, D. Y., & Zhou, X. (2017). Planning for retirement: Longitudinal effect on retirement resources and post-retirement well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01300