為因應數位化資訊時代及世界各國教育改革之潮流，我國在教育部推動下全國各公立高職皆有建罝自已的圖書館網站，以增加師生溝通的管道與共享校內數位化的資源。雖然大部份的學校皆已完成網站的建置，然而部份高職圖書館網站內容卻參差不齊，不符合使用者需求。圖書館網站就像是引導讀者進入知識寶庫的萬能鑰匙， 讀者上圖書館網站的機率將比親自到圖書館造訪還高。高中職圖書館網站在未來的學校教育中究竟能扮演什麼樣的角色? 面對e世代文化的衝擊，圖書館網站服務是否能滿足使用者的資訊需求?學校圖書館網站的設計是否是以學生使用者的觀點來設計？還是以圖書館網站的功能性來設計，圖書館究竟該如何協助使用者取得有用又可靠的資訊服務? 這些都是值得我們關心的話題。綜觀國內外相關文獻， 至今對公立高職圖書館網站好用性(Usability)探討仍缺乏相關完整的研究。有鑑於此，研究者擬從使用者角度切入， 探討公立高職圖書館網站好用性的評估，進而提供學校能設計更適切的圖書館網站之評估指標，以吸引更多的學生使用圖書館網站。本研究建立六大構面、二十八項指標作為公立高職學校圖書館網站好用性評估標準。六大構面分別為圖書館網站、內容性、權威性、連結性、新穎性、可得性、交流性。

For adapting to the digital information time and the tendency of educational revolution all around the world, the Department of Education urged the public vocational high schools to establish their own web sites. Nowadays most of the vacational high schools both reach the goal and enforce the communication channel between the teachers and the students. Through sharing the information it creates a digital learning environment.All websites of which the libraries owns in public vocational high school doesn’t meet the users’ needs, though most schools have accomplished their own websites. The website in the library is as a marvelous key to leading the readers to treasure island of knowledge. Because of this reason, readers get on the internet much more often than they does in person. What role will these websites play in the future education? With the tendency of E- generation, will the readers’ desire be met from the browse provided by these websites? Is the design of the websites still popular in terms of the users’ need? Otherwise, is it the functioned- based design that counts? How to help users get what want is the key point, which catch our full attention at the same time. Of the documents at home and abroad, the discourse about the usability is still not sufficient. From this point of view, the researcher is planning to evaluate all websites of public vocational school around the island.. Furtherfore, the author looks forward to building up standard criteria widely used at school to attract students’ attention. The discourse in the study is divided into six dimensions and twenty- eight criteria, used as the standards. In six dimensions, they are the website, contents, authoritativeness, navigation, currency , accessibility, interaction, and so on.

中文部份：
黃朝盟（民90）。電子化政府的網站設計與評估。台北市：韋伯文化。
藍素華（民90）。大學圖書館網站資訊架構可用性之研究：以國立臺灣大學圖書館網站為例。未出版之碩士論文，臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。
謝寶煖(民90)數位典藏網站好用性評估
http://www.sinica.edu.tw/~ndaplib/channels/dlm_paper/web%20usability%20checklist.pdf
林明宏（民91）。技專校院圖書館個人化資訊服務之研究-以台中技術學院圖書館為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所，台中市。
周欣鶯（民91）。農學院師生使用實體圖書館與圖書館網站服務比較研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立中興大學，台中市。
謝寶煖、周秉貞（民92）。以顧客導向觀點評估政府網站之資訊架構。圖書與資訊學刊，46, 36-89。
許銀雄、何祖鳳、詹榮昌（民92）。網站人機界面可用性評估方法之比較。銘傳學刊，13，25-42。
吳菊貞(民93) 教育機構網站內容之研究－以臺北市國民小學網站為例。未出版之碩士論文，世新大學，台北市。
謝寶煖（民93）。大學圖書館網站資訊組織之研究。在淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系主辦，2004年現代資訊組織與檢索研討會，臺北縣淡水鎮。
謝寶煖;周秉貞（民93）。政府網站資訊架構之評估。管理與系統，11(2)，175-198。
魏澤群（民94）。使用者最大：從優使性（Usability）出發的網站設計原則。臺北市：網奕資訊科技。
蔡維君(民95)。大學圖書館網站好用性評估—以臺灣大學圖書館網站為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣大學，台北市。
英文部份
Augustine, S., & Greene, C. (2002, July). Discovering how students search a library web site: A usability Case Study.College & Research Libraries, 63, 354-365.
Benjes, C.; J.F. Brown (2001). Test, Revise, Retest: Usability Testing and Library Web Sites. Internet Reference Services Quarterly 5 (4), pp. 37-54.
Clyde, L. A. (2004). School library web sites: 1996-2002. Electronic Library, 22(2), 158-167.
Dickstein, Ruth; Vicki Mills (2000). Usability Testing at the University of Arizona Library: How to Let the Users in on the Design. Information Technology and Libraries 19 (3), pp.144-150. Electronic version: http://archive.lita.org/ital/1903_mills.html
IS&T Usability Guidelines
http://web.mit.edu/ist/usability/usability-guidelines.html(accessed December 10, 2006)
Kupersmith, John (2003a). Library terms evaluated in usability tests and other studies. http://www.jkup.net/terms-studies.html
Rosenfeld, L.and Morville,P.(1998) Information Architecture for the World wide web, Cambridge:O’Reilly
Powell,T.A(2000) Web Design:The Complete Reference, Berkeley, Calif Osborne/McGraw-Hill
Dickstein, Ruth, and Mills (2000), Ruth.Usability Testing at the University of Arizona Library: How to Let the Users in on the Design, Information Technology and Libraries, 19:3, 144-150.
Nielsen, J.(1993). Usability Engineering. Boston: AP Professional.
Nielsen, J.(2000). Designing Web Usability. New Riders Publishing.
Popp, Mary Pagliero. (2001). Testing library Web sites:ARL libraries weigh in. Paper presented at the Association of College and Research Libraries, 10th National Conference, Denver, Colorado, March 15–18,2001. http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlevents/popp.pdf (accessed December 10, 2006)

REMIGIUSZ SAPA(2005).The Roles of American and Polish Academic Library Web Sites:a Comparative Study
http://www.librijournal.org/pdf/2005-1pp1-20.pdf(accessed December 10, 2006)
Reiss, E.L (2000) Practical Information Architecture : A Hands-on Approach to Structuring Successful Websites, Harlow,England: Addison Wesley
Rosenfeld, L., & Morville, P.(2002). Information architecture for the World Wide Web. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: O’Reilly.
McLachlan, L. (2002). Www cyberguide ratings for website content evaluation.
http://www.cyberbee.com/content.pdf(accessed December 10, 2006)
McLachlan, L. (2002). Www cyberguide ratings for website design.
http://www.cyberbee.com/design.pdf(accessed December 10, 2006)
Raward, R. A. (2003, January 21-23). A report on the development of a usability
analysis tool for the evaluation of library websites. Paper presented at the 11th
Information Online Exhibition & Conference.

Nathan Shedroff (2005) Experience Design http://www.nathan.com/present/experiencedesign/index.html (accessd December 15,2006)