研究生: |
鍾彥貞 YEN-CHEN CHUNG |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
應用鷹架理論輔助地理科網路合作學習-以高中地理實察為例 The Applications of Scaffolding on Network Supported Cooperative Learning of Geography : A Case Study of High School Fieldwork |
指導教授: | 陳哲銘 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
地理學系 Department of Geography |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 95 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 198 |
中文關鍵詞: | 網路合作學習 、地理實察 、鷹架 |
英文關鍵詞: | Network Supported Cooperative Learning, Fieldwork, Scaffolding |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:248 下載:58 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
網路合作學習是教育的新趨勢,可培養學生運用資訊通訊科技建立與人溝通分享的能力。就地理教育而言,利用網際網路進行跨地域研究成果的分享與討論,可使學生增廣見聞,瞭解到區域的多樣性與差異性。但觀看台灣的地理教育,較缺乏以地理教育為主的跨校網路合作學習研究個案,加上網路合作學習若沒有經過適當的引導,難以達成學習成效。因此,本研究欲以地理實察為例,建立一套應用「鷹架」作為引導策略的跨校網路合作學習教學模組,並邀請兩所高中來合作,以實驗研究來證實以鷹架輔助的跨校網路合作學習是否能達到預定的教學目標。研究結果發現,以鷹架輔助的網路合作學習能使學生發揮良好的學習成效,有效激發學生的學習興趣,學生表示透過跨校網路合作學習,以角色扮演的方式與校際小組合作規劃地理實察路線,能對地理實察有更深入的認識,且喜歡以這種方式來瞭解其他區域並瞭解到合作學習的重要性。
The new trend in education is network supported cooperative learning. Students can learn how to communication using electronic methods through online collaboration. Speaking of geography education, the use of Internet for research results sharing and discussion, will enable students to broaden their horizon, understand the diversity and regional differences. In Taiwan, because of the lack of case study that learn geography by collaborating electronically in multi-schools teams, in addition, the network cooperative learning needs the suitable guidance to be able to achieve the study effects, this research aims to provide the instructional module of fieldwork with scaffolding applied for directing online cooperative learning. The module was tested among two senior high school and testified whether the expected learning objectives can be achieved. The results shows the strategy, network supported cooperative learning with scaffolding assisted, has developed sound learning outcomes and inspirited learners’ learning interests effectively. Students indicated that they like learning how to plan fieldwork routes and know other areas by role-playing together with different schoos learners by collaborating electronically. Besides, this learning way didn’t only strengthen students’ understanding in fieldwork concepts but also realized the importance of cooperative learning.
【中文部分】
王千倖(2003)。以「網路同儕教學」建構「網路學習社群」之行動研究,師大學報:科學教育類,48(1),117-139。
王宏仁、陳斐卿、江火明(2003)。網路學習社群成員之認同歷程,高台茜(主持人),WBL學習社群探討,國際電腦輔助教學研討會,國立台灣師範大學,台北,民96年4月27日取自http://210.240.187.63/teaching/2003summer/onlinetest/ICCAI2003/pdf/B4_4.pdf。
王淑如、王裕德(2001)。教學新策略-網路合作學習。台灣教育,603,33-39。
王智玄(2000)。新的學習策略-網路合作式學習之探討。資訊與教育雜誌,78,42-50。
王豐緒(1999)。WWW上智慧型合作學習環境之研究:一個全球氣候歸納探索學習環境,遠距教育,12,26-35。
邱瓊慧、陳煥彬、魏來成、胡馨文、喬祺、李建樹(無日期)。網路合作學習環境之研究。民96年5月24日取自http://acbe.tku.edu.tw/iccai8/59/59.htm。
林奇賢(2004)。網路學習內容的設計與學習社群的經營。資訊融入教學之環境建置與應用專書,吳鐵雄編印,國科會科學教育研究成果應用推廣計畫:NSC 92-2511-S-024-005,149-177。
周玉秀(1998)。維高斯基心理歷史分析。幼教天地,15,241-251。
李郁薇(2005)。網路潛水社群中的潛水現象:一種被忽略的充分參與。國立中央大學學習與教學研究所碩士論文。
李青蓉(1999)。以學習者為中心的網路教學觀:學習友「有」伴網。遠距教育,10,47-55。
李坤崇(2004)。修訂Bloom認知分類及命題實例。教育研究月刊,122,98-127。
教育研究法-研究設計實務(楊夢麗、謝水南譯)(2003)。臺北市:心理出版社。
高碧玉(2005)。網路學習社群互動策略之實證研究。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
徐新逸(2001)。如何利用網路幫助孩子成為研究高手--網路專題式學習與教學創新。台灣教育,607,25-34。
陳正乾(1998)。發展與學習之間的關係-皮亞傑與維高斯基的對話。幼教天地,15,185-203。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北市:五南圖書出版有限公司。
陳哲銘(2003)。網路合作學習--地理教學的新典範?。地友,59,1-15,民96年5月24日,取自http://www.geo.ntnu.edu.tw/research_publish/magazine/%A6a%A4%CD59.doc。
陳年興 (1998)。全球資訊網整合式學習環境Web-based Learning Environment。資訊與教育, 64, 2-13。
陳得聖、許鄭金鳳(1999)。網路學習及其理論架構,全球華人計算機教育期刊,民95年4月27日,取自http://www.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/GCJCE/gcjce01.html。
陳煥彬(1999)。網路合作學習系統之規劃、建置與評估。國立台南師範學院資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
第八屆台灣學校網界博覽會(2007)。第八屆台灣學校網界博覽會。民96年5月11日,取自http://cyberfair.taiwanschoolnet.org/commencement.asp。
探究式學習網站(無日期)。探究式學習網站,民95年5月12日,取自http://lain.atm.ncu.edu.tw/main.php?id=guest。
葉連祺、林淑萍(2003)。布魯姆[B. S. Bloom]認知領域教育目標分類修訂版之探討。教育研究,105,94-106。
鄭麗玉(1993)。認知心理學-理論與應用。台北市:五南圖書出版有限公司。
蔡崇元(2001)。網路教學者教學互動策略之研究─以大學推廣教育教師為例。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
廖信達(2002)。建構主義及其對幼教課程的啟示—從皮亞傑與維高斯基的理論談起。德育學報,18,93-109。
賴景昌、林國仕(2004)。知識經濟。科學發展,377,58-63。
【英文部分】
ACA(n.d.). APEC Cyber Academy, retrieved May 26, 2006, from http://linc.hinet.net/apec/.
Chang, S. M., Lee, Y. W., Chen, F. C., & Jiang, H. M.(2006). Synergetic scaffolding among telementors:complementarity or tensions. Paper presented at the GCCCE(The 10th Global Chinese Conference on Computing in Education)Conference, Beijing, China.
CGGE(n.d.). The Online Center for Global Geography Education, retrieved November 8, 2005, from http://www.aag.org/Education/center/cgge-aag%20site/index.html.
Doering, A., Yerasimou, T., & Veletsianos, G. (2005). Multi-Scaffolding Environment (MSE): Providing Authentic Assistance in an Online Learning Environment. In Kommers, P., & Richards, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2005: 3853-3857. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://jane.coe.uga.edu/twt/resources/documents/EdMedia_paper.pdf.
Eurogame (n.d.). Eurogame, retrieved May 8, 2006, from http://www.eurogame.uli.it/en/intro.php.
Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problemsolving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5 – 22.
GLOBE (n.d.). The GLOBE Program, retrieved May 26, 2006, from http://www.globe.gov/fsl/html/aboutglobe.cgi?intro&lang=en&nav=1.
Houtsonen, L., ArbØl, K., Kankaanrinta, IK., & Rehunen, A.(2006). Wed-based international projects in geographical, environmental and cultural education:The European YoungNet Project as a case study, retrieved May 12, 2006, from http://geog.tamu.edu/sarah/houtsonenetal6.pdf.
Hurley, J. M., Proctor, J. D., & Ford, R. E. (1999). Collaborative inquiry at a distance: using the Internet in geography education. Jouranl of Geography, 98(3), 128-140.
Kagan, S. (1992). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
Lee, E. Y. C., Chan, C. K. K., & Aalst, J. V. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 57-87.
MacGregor, S.K. & Lou, Y. (2004). Web-based learning: how task Scaffolding and WebSite Design Support Knowledge Acquisition. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 161-175.
MyCOE(n.d.). Geographic learning for sustainable development, retrieved May 22, 2006, from http://www.aag.org/sustainable/.
Nussbaum, E. M. (2002). Scaffolding argumentation in the social studies classroom. The Social Studies, March/April, 79–83.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L.(1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
Pata, K., Sarapuu, T., & Lehtinen, E.(2005). Tutor-scaffolding styles of dilemma solving in network-based role-play. Learning and Instruction, 15, 571-587.
Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C.(1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317-344.
Pedersen, S. & Liu, M. (2002). The transfer of problem-solving skills from a problem-based learning environment: The effects of modeling an expert’s cognitive processes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 303-320.
Reed, M., & Mitchell, B.(2001). Using information technologies for collaborative learning in geography: a case study from Canada. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 25(3), 321-339.
Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia- supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development ,50(3), 77-96.
Skoool.ie(n.d.). Skoool.ie, retrieved August 20, 2006, from http://www.skoool.ie/skoool/examcentre_sc.asp?id=511.
Solem, M. N., Bell, S., Fournier, E., Gillespie, C., Lewitsky, M., & Lockton, H. (2003). Using the Internet to support international collaborations for global geography Education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(3), 239-253.
Shepherd, I. H., Monk, J. J., & Fortuijn, J. D. (2000). Internationalizing geography in higher education: towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(2), 285-298.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press
Wolf, S. E., Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2003). Using an information problem-solving model as a metacognitive scaffold for multimedia-supported information-based problems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 321–341.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
Zydney, J. M.(n.d.). Scaffolded flexibility model. retrieved May 22, 2006, from http://edsrc.coe.uky.edu/people/jzydn2/ZydneySFM.pdf.