簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張期敏
Chi-min Chang
論文名稱: 語言為倫理中的他者: 唐‧迪立羅的三部曲
Language as the Ethical Other: Don DeLillo's Trilogy
指導教授: 梁孫傑
Liang, Sun-Chieh
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 235
中文關鍵詞: 列維納斯唐‧迪立羅倫理學他者語言自我
英文關鍵詞: Levinas, Don DeLillo, ethics, the Other, language, the self
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:187下載:29
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 中文摘要
    本論文旨要就迪立羅的三本小說: 《名字》(1982), 《白色雜音》(1985)和《毛II》(1991)探討語言在後現代中如何扮演他者的角色, 首先以列維納斯的倫理架構作為檢視的主軸,強調語言和一個不可化約的他者的關係,再審視唐‧迪立羅對語言的觀察如何呼應列維納斯倫理中所強調的感官性,使不再拘泥於文字聲音的呈現, 而以身體感官的感受作為和他者對話的首要機制。 語言為他者的討論共分為三個面向:第一個面向探討《名字》中感官和環境的深層對話,再與語言文字原本的神秘性相呼應,列維納斯的斷時性(diachrony)則被用來說明他者的捉摸不定及無法比較性,同時也顯示自我的絕對被動性。第二個部份以《白色雜音》中所呈現的死亡概念為主軸, 進一步討論直接和間接的身體語言, 直接的身體語言敘述自我對死亡不停歇的恐懼, 再加上科技對生活影響的觀察,產生一種間接的身體語言,將自我的無助描寫得更加透徹,自我不僅沒有任何主導權且一步步地被他者化(Othered)。第三個面向是對影像語言的探討,其呼應的是後現代中影像已取代語言文字成為更強勢語言的狀況, 但迪立羅有著不同於列維納斯的寫作企圖: 雖然同在一個突顯他著不可化約及不可統整的前提下, 自我似乎不只被質疑且幾乎消融殆盡,但迪立羅卻在倫理關係的耙梳中看到探討自我的必要,以列維納斯對他者的責任及回應概念出發, 證實自我的可能性如何一次一次出現在對他者的回應中,而這些新的可能性並非只是隨機的結果, 而是自我獨特性的顯現,其中蘊含了複雜的自我解讀, 證實了自我在回應他者的同時,仍存有某種自主性及自由。 李歐塔的異教徒的語言遊戲及事件的時間概念(event) 也被用來闡釋自我對他者的回應如何在倫理關係中被激發出來,也就是倫理關係中的自我並非單一面向。 整個倫理關係的探討回應到後現代最棘手的人文論述:在如此的倫理關係解讀中,自我的可能性及獨特性如何重新定義後現代中的人本主義(humanism) 和產生另一種對話的可能。

    This dissertation aims to explore three of Don DeLillo’s novels, The Names (1982), White Noise (1985), and Mao II (1991) to see how language plays the role of the ethical Other in the postmodern age. The analysis, pivoted on Levinas’s ethics, would first stress the relation between language and the irreducible Other and go on to examine how DeLillo’s observation of language corresponds to Levinas’s ethical perspectives which are marked by sensibility. That is, DeLillo’s language in terms of ethics goes beyond the notion of language which is restricted to word-sound linkages. The empirical perception is the premier arena for the dialogue with the Other. The discussion on language as the ethical Other mainly falls on three distinct aspects. First, DeLillo in The Names presents the wor(l)d reading which comprises the profound conversation between the senses and the surroundings and imbricates the original mysteries of words. The discussion draws on Levinas's notion of diachrony, demonstrating how time accounts for the irreducibility and incommesurability of the elusive Other as well as the radical passivity of the self. Secondly, the discussion goes to the immediate and mediated corporeal language, hinging on the idea of death in White Noise. The immediate bodily language relates the self’s incessant fear of death. In addition, with DeLillo’s observation of how technology affects life, he makes an acute presentation of the self’s vulnerability and helplessness. In the ethical relation, death as the corporeal language is not merely overwhelming but self-othering. Thirdly, it is the exploration of the language of image. It echoes the phenomenon in the postmodern age in which images have become a more imposing and dominant language in communication and information circulation. With similar emphasis on the image as the irreducible and untotalizable Other, DeLillo makes a divergent attempt in writing from that of Levinas. As the self in the ethical relation is questioned, diminished and even dissolved, DeLillo particularly contends the importance to explore the self in such an Other-oriented ethical relation. Starting with Levinas’s notion of the responsibility for the Other, DeLillo demonstrates how the new possibilities of the self come out in his response to the Other. However, these new possibilities are not the contingent or provisional consequences but the presentation of one’s individuality. The individuality involves complicate reading of the ethical self, confirming there is certain kind of freedom in one’s responsibility for the Other. Lyotard’s idea of pagan language games and the notion of the event help shed light on how the self is spurred to make new moves in the ethical relation. That means the self is no longer single-dimensioned. A profound reading of the self is necessary to understand how the vulnerable and passive self is rendered the potentiality for new possibilities, a way to assert one’s individuality, in particular. In addition, such an exploration of the ethical relation makes a remarkable response to the discourse of humanism—to redefine humanism in the postmodern age in terms of the individuality in the language-pivoted ethical relation.

    Table of Contents Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 I. DeLillo’s “Both/And” Writing—Language as the Ethical Other . . . . . . . . . 2 II. DeLillo vs. Levinas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 III. Individuality in DeLillo and Levinas . . . . . . . 25 Chapter One: Language as the Ethical Other . . . . . . . 30 I. The Language Turn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 II. Language: From the Uncontrollable to the Ethical Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .34 III. The Ethical Other . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Chapter Two: Language as Sensibility: The Spatial/Temporal Loop in The Names . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 I. Language in The Names: From the Instrumental to the Ethical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 59 II. Diachrony in Language as the Ethical Other. . . . . 67 III. Language Comprising the Spatial-Temporal Loop . .. . 71 IV. The Self in the Ethical Relation with Language . . .86 Chapter Three: From the Sensibly Immediate to the Technologically Mediated . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 96 I. Death: The Diverging Convergence . . . . . . . . .105 II. The Other as the Sensually Immediate. . . . . . . . 112 III. The Mediated Ethical Contour in the Postmodern Age .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 Chapter Four: Individuality in the Ethical Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .134 I. The Self: Suspended or Sustained? . . . . . . . . .137 II. Mao II: The Wor(l)d of Image . .. . . . . . . . . . 144 III. The Otherness of Image. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 IV. Ethical Individuality . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .161 Chapter Five: An-Other Human Prospect: Ethics in the Postmodern Age . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .177 I. Ethical Individuality: A Reconfiguration of Humanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180 II. Time as the Axis of the Ethical Self . . .. . . . . 191 III. Space for the Individuality . . . . . . . . . . 199 VI. Different Freedom Presupposed in New Possibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 Conclusion: Other-renewed Self vs. Time-inscribed Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 I. The Other: An Inevitable Confrontation. . . .. . . .210 II. Language as the Ethical Other . . . . . . . . . . . 211 III. The Other with an Empirical Face . . . . . . . . . .214 VI. The Temporal-Spatial Loop in Ethics . . . . . .. . .217 V. Humanism Reconfigured . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 Works Cited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .223

    Primary sources
    DeLillo, Don. 1989: The Names. New York: Vintage.
    ----. 1986: White Noise. New York: Penguin.
    ----. 1992: Mao II. New York: Penguin.

    Secondary sources
    Aaron, Daniel. 1991. “How to Read Don DeLillo.”
    Introducing Don DeLillo. Ed. Frank Lentricchia.
    Durham and London: Duke UP. 67-81
    Abbinnett, Ross. 1998. “Postmodernity and the Ethics of
    Care: Situating Bauman’s Social Theory.” Cultural
    Values 2.1: 87-116.
    Agamben, Giorgio. 1993. The Coming Community.
    Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
    Arnett, Ronald C. 2003. “The Responsive “I”: Levinas’s
    Derivative Argument.” Argumentation & Advocacy 40.1:
    39-50.
    Barrett, Laura. 1999. “‘Here But Also There’:
    Subjectivity and Postmodern Space in Mao II.” Modern
    Fiction Studies 45.3: 788-810.
    Barry Jr., James. 1991. “The Technical Body:
    Incorporating Technology and Flesh.” Philosophy Today
    35.4: 390-401.
    Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation. Trans.
    Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P.
    Bauman, Zygmunt. 1993. Postmodern Ethics. Cambridge:
    Blackwell.
    Benjamin, Walter. 1978. Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms,
    Autobiographical Writings. . Ed. Peter Demetz. Trans.
    Edmund Jephcott. New York: Schocken Books.
    ----. 1968. Illuminations. Ed. Hannah Arendt. Trans.
    Harry Zohn. New York: Schochen Book.
    Barrett, Laura. 2001-2002. “‘How the dead speak to the
    living’: Intertextuality and the Postmodern Sublime in
    White Noise.” Journal of Modern Literature 25.2: 97-
    113.
    ----. 1999. “ ‘Here But Also There’: Subjectivity and
    Postmodern Space in Mao II.” Modern Fiction Studies
    45.3: 788-810.
    Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image—Music—Text. Trans.
    Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang.
    ----. 1980. Camera Lucida. Trans. Richard Howard. New
    York: Hill and Wang.
    Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation.
    Trans. Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P.
    Beck, Ulrich, Anthony Giddens and Scott Lash. 1994.
    Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and
    Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge:
    Polity.
    Bell, Daniel. 1973. The Coming of Post-industrial
    Society: a Venture in Social Forecasting. New York:
    Basic Books.
    Best, Steven and Douglas Kellner. 2001. The Postmodern
    Adventure: Science, Technology, and Cultural Studies at
    the third Millennium. New York: Guilford.
    Bizzini, Silvia Caporale. 1995. “Can the Intellectual
    still Speak? The Example of Don DeLillo’s Mao II.”
    Critical Quarterly 37.2: 104-17.
    Blanchot, Maurice. 1999. The Infinite Conversation.
    Trans. Susan Hanson. Minneapolis and London: U of
    Minnesota P.
    Bogue, Roland. 1989. Deleuze and Guattari. London:
    Routledge.
    Bonca, Cornel. 1996. “Don DeLillo’s White Noise: The
    Natural Language of the Species.” College Literature
    23.2: 25-44.
    Brink, André. 1998. The Novel: Language and Narrative
    from Cervantes and Calvino. Hampshire: MacMillan.
    Bruns, Gerald L. 1996. “Blanchot/Levinas: Interrruption
    (On the Conflict of Alterities).” Research in
    Phenomenology 26: 132-54.
    Bryant, Paula. 1987. “Discussing the Untellable: Don
    DeLillo’s The Names.” Critique 29.1: 16-29.
    Bull, Jeoffrey S. 1999. “‘What About a Problem That
    doesn’t Have a Solution?’ Stone’s A Flag for
    Sunrise, Don DeLillo’s Mao II, and the Politics of
    Political Fiction.” Critique 40.3: 215-29.
    Burggraeve, Roger. 1999. “Violence and the Vulnerable
    Face of the Other: The Vision of Emmanuel Levinas on
    Moral Evil and Our Responsibility.” Journal of
    Social Philosophy 30.1: 29-45.
    Campbell, David. 2003. “Representing Contemporary
    War.” Ethics & International Affairs 17.2: 99-108.
    Carmichael, Thomas. 1993. “Lee Harvey Oswald and the
    Postmodern Subject: History and Intertextuality in Don
    DeLillo’s Libra, The Names, and Mao II.”
    Contemporary Literature 34.2: 204-18.
    Caton, Lou F. 1997. “Romanticism and the Postmodern
    Novel: Three Scenes From Don DeLillo’s White
    Noise.” English Language Notes: 38-48.
    Clark, Timothy. 1992. Derrida, Heidegger, Blanchot:
    Sources of Derrida’s Notion and Practice of
    Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
    Cohen, Richard A., ed. 1986. Face to Face with Levinas.
    Albany: U of New York P.
    Conroy, Mark. 1994. “From Tombstone to Tabloid: Authority
    Figured in White Noise.” Critique 35.2: 97-110.
    Crockett, Clayton. 2005. “Technology and the Time-image:
    Deleuze and Postmodern Subjectivity.” South African
    Journal of Philosophy 24.3: 176-88.
    Crowther, Hal. 1994. “Cling to the Rock.” Introducing
    Don DeLillo. Ed. Frank Lentricchia. Durham and
    London: Duke UP. 83-98.
    Dallmayr, Fred R. 1984. “Introduction.” Theunissen ix-
    xxiv.
    Darnell, Michelle. 2004. “Being-looked-at: Ontological
    Grounding for an Ethics in Being and Nothingness.”
    Sartre Studies International 10.1: 15-24.
    De Boer, Theodore. 1986. “An Ethical Transcendental
    Philosophy.” Face to Face with Levinas. 83-115.
    Debord, Guy. 1995. The Society of the Spectacle. Trans.
    Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books.
    Deleuze, G. 1984. Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Trans. H.
    Tomlinson and B. Habberjam. Minneapolis: U of
    Minnesota P.
    Don DeLillo. 2005a. “An Interview with Don DeLillo.”
    Conversations with Don DeLillo. Ed. Thomas DePietro.
    Jackson: UP of Mississippi. 3-15.
    ----. 2005b. “An Interview with Don DeLillo.”
    Conversations with Don DeLillo. Ed. Thomas DePietro.
    Jackson: UP of Mississippi. 25-39.
    ----. 1998. “Don DeLillo: The Art of Fiction.” Osteen
    331-332.
    ----. 1993a. “An Interview with Don DeLillo.” Ed.
    Thomas DePietro. Conversations with Don DeLillo.
    Jackson: UP of Mississippi, 2005. 109-18.
    ----. 1993b. “The Image and the Crowd.” Creative
    Camera: 72-73.
    ----. 1993c. “Don DeLillo: The Art of Fiction CXXXV.”
    Paris Review 128: 275-306.
    ---. 1990. “‘An Outsider in This Society’: An
    Interview with Don DeLillo.” The South Atlantic
    Quarterly 89.2: 281-304.
    Derrida, Jacques. 2003. “Difference.” From Modernism
    to Postmodernism: An Anthology. Ed. L. Cahoone.
    Oxford: Blackwell.
    ----. 1992. The Gift of Death. Trans. David Willis.
    Chicago: U of Chicago P.
    ----. 1991. The Derrida Reader. Ed. Peggy Kamuf. New
    York: Columbia UP.
    ----. 1982. Margins of Philosophy. Trans. Alan Bass.
    New York: Harvester P.
    ----. 1978. Writing and Difference. Trans. A. Bass.
    Chicago: U of Chicago P.
    ----. 1976. Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty
    Spivak. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins.
    Dussel, Enrique. 1999. “‘Sensibility’ and ‘Otherness’
    in Emmanuel Levinas.” Philosophy Today 43.2: 126-34.
    Duvall, John N. 1994. “The (Super)market of Images:
    Television as Unmediaetd Mediation in DeLillo’s White
    Noise.” Arizona Quarterly 50.3: 1127-53.
    Edmund, Mark. 1995. “Not Flat, Not Round, Not There, Don
    DeLillo’s Novel Characters.” Yale Review 83: 107-24.
    Ferreira, M. Jamie. 2001. “‘Total Altruism’ in
    Levinas’s ‘Ethics of the Welcome.’” Journal of
    Religious Ethics 29.3: 443-70.
    Ford, David. 1999. Self and Salvation: Being
    Transformed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
    Foster, Dennis A. 1990. “Alphabetic Pleasures: The
    Names.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 89.2: 395-411.
    Foucault, Michel. 1987. “Maurice Blanchot: The Thought
    from Outside.” Trans. Brian Massumi.
    Foucault/Blanchot. New York: Zone Books.
    Gammelgaard, Judy. 2003. “Ego, self and otherness.”
    Scandinavian Psychoanalysis 26.2: 96-108.
    Gibson, Margaret. 2001. “Death Scenes: Ethics of the
    Face and Cinematic Deaths.” Morality 6.3: 306-20.
    Graham, Elaine. 2004. “Post/Human Conditions.”
    Theology & Sexuality: Journal of the Institute for the
    Study of Christianity & Sexuality 10.2: 10-32.
    Guyer, Paul. 1993. Kant and the Experience of Freedom:
    Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. New York:
    Cambridge UP.
    Hall, Sharon K., ed. 1985. Contemporary Literary
    Criticism. Detroit: Gale Research.
    Hand, Seán. 1989. “Introduction.” The Levinas Reader.
    Ed. Seán Hand. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 1-8.
    Hansen, James T. 2005. “Postmodernism and Humanism: A
    Proposed Integration of Perspectives That Value Human
    Meaning Systems.” Journal of Humanistic Counseling,
    Education & Development 44.1: 3-15.
    Hardack, Richard. 2004. “Two’s a Crowd: Mao II, Coke
    II, and the Politics of Terrorism in Don DeLillo.”
    Studies in the Novel 36.3: 374-92.
    Hardin, Michael. 2002. “Postmodernism’s Desire for
    Simulated Death: Andy Warhol’s Car Crashes, J. G.
    Ballard’s Crash, and Don DeLillo’s White Noise.”
    Literature Interpretation Theory 13: 21-50.
    Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Question Concerning
    Technology. Trans. William Lovitt. New York: Harper
    & Row.
    ----. 1971a. Poetry, Language, Thought. Trans. Albert
    Hofstadter. New York: Harper & Row.
    ----. 1971b. On the Way to Language. Trans. Peter D.
    Hertz. San Franscico: Happer & Row.
    ----. 1953. Being and Time. Trans. Joan Stambaugh.
    Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
    Hooft, Stan van. 2004. Book Review. “Emmanuel Levinas:
    Humanism of the Other.” Journal of Moral Philosophy
    1.2: 234-37.
    Hoy, David Cousens. 1979. “Forgetting the Text:
    Derrida’s Critique of Heidegger.” Boundary 8.1: 223-
    35.
    Hume, David. 1994. “The Long Search of the Origins of
    Ethics.” Singer 37-38.
    Huskinson, Lucy. 2002. “The Self as violent Other: the
    problem of defining the self.” Journal of Analytical
    Psychology 47: 437-58.
    Iyer, Pico. 1998. “A Connoisseur of Fear.” Osteen 379-
    84.
    Junge, Matthias. 2001. “Zygmunt Bauman’s Poisoned Gift
    of Morality.” British Journal of Sociology 52.1: 105-
    19.
    Kant, Immanuel. 1994. “The Nobel Descent of Duty.”
    Singer 29-41.
    ----. 1952. The Critique of Judgement. Trans. James
    Creed Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon.
    Kearney, Richard. 1984. Dialogue with Contemporary
    Continental Thinkers. Manchester: Manchester UP.
    Keenan, Dennis King. 1999. Death and Responsibility.
    Albany: U of New York P.
    Keesy, Douglas. 1993. Don DeLillo. New York: Twayne.
    Klinkowitz, Jerome. 1984. The Self-apparent Word.
    Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
    Kundera, Milan. 1988. The Art of the Novel. Trans. Linda
    Asher. New York: Perennial Library.
    large, william. 2005. Ethics and the Ambiguity of
    Writing. Manchester: Clinamen.
    ----. 2002. “Impersonal Experience: a conceptual
    genealogy of the ‘there is’ from Heidegger to
    blanchot and levinas.” Angelaki: Journal of the
    Theoretical Humanities 7.3: 131-42.
    Lash, Scott. 1999. Another Rationality. Oxford:
    Blackwell.
    ----. 1994. “Reflexivity and its Doubles: Structure,
    Aesthetics, Community.” Beck 110-73.
    Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans.
    Catherine Porter. New York: Harvester.
    LeBon, Gusatv. 1960. The Psychology of the Crowd. New
    York: Viking.
    LeClair, Tom. 1998. “Closing the Loop: White Noise.”
    Osteen 387-411.
    ----. 1987. In the Loop: Don DeLillo and the Systems
    Novel. Urbana: U of Illinois P.
    Lentricchia, Frank, ed. 1994. Introducing Don DeLillo.
    Durham: Duke UP.
    ----. 1990. “The American Writer as Bad Citizen—
    Introducing Don DeLillo.” South Atlantic Quarterly
    89.2: 239-80.
    Levene, Nancy. 2004. “Levinas’s Beginnings: Ethics,
    Politics, and Origins.” The European Legacy 9.1: 43-
    54.
    Levesque, Richard. 1998. “Telling Postmodern Tales:
    Absent Authorities in Didion’s Democracy and
    DeLillo’s Mao II.” Arizona Quarterly 54.3: 69-87.
    Levinas, Emmanuel. 2003. Humanism of the Other. Trans.
    Nidra Poller. Urbana and Chicago: U of Illinois P.
    ----. 2000a. God, Death and Time. Trans. Bettina Bergo.
    Standford: Standford UP.
    ----. 2000b. Otherwise than Being. Trans. Alphonso
    Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne UP.
    ----. 1994. Outside the Subject. Eds. Werner Hamacher &
    David E. Wellbery. Trans. Michael B. Smith.
    Standford: Standfor UP.
    ----. 1990. Difficult Freedom. Trans. Seán Hand.
    Baltimore: John Hopkins UP.
    ----. 1989. The Levinas Reader. Ed. Sean Hand. New
    York: Blackwell.
    ----. 1988. “The Paradox of Morality: an Interview with
    Emmanuel Levinas.” The Provocation of Levinas. Ed. Robert Bernasconi and David Wood. London and New York:
    Routledge.
    ----. 1987b. Time and the Other. Trans. Richard A.
    Cohen. Pittsburgh: Duquesne Up.
    ----. 1986. “Dialogue with Emmaneul Levinas.” With
    Richard Kearney. Face to Face with Levinas. 13-33.
    ----. 1985. Ethics and Infinity: Conversation with
    Philippe Nemo. Trans. Richard A. Cohen. Pittsburgh:
    Duquesne UP.
    ----. 1979. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on
    Exteriority. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Hingham:
    Martinus Nijhoff.
    ---. 1978. Existence and Existents. Trans. Alphonso
    Ligis. The Hague: Martinus Hijhoff.
    Levinas E. and Kearney Richard. 1986. “Dialogue with
    Emmaneul Levinas.” Cohen 13-34.
    Linstead, Stephen and John Mullarkey. 2003. “Time,
    Creativity and Culture: Introducing Bergson.”
    Culture and Organization 9.1: 3-13.
    Llewelyn, John. 1988. “Levinas, Derrida and Others Vis-á-
    vis.” The Provocation of Levinas. Ed. Robert
    Bernasconi and David Wood. London and New York:
    Routledge.
    Longmuir, Anne. 2005. “The Language of History: Don
    DeLillo’s The Names and the Iranian Hostage
    Crisis.” Critique 46.2: 105-20.
    Loughlin, Gerald. 2005. “Desiring Bodies.” Cross
    Currents 54.4: 69-77.
    Lumsden, Simon. 2000. “Absolute Difference and Social
    Ontology: Levinas Face to Face with Buber and
    Fichte.” Human Studies 23.2: 227-41.
    Lyotard, Jean-François. 1991. The Inhuman: Reflection on
    Time. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowley.
    Cambridge: Polity.
    Lyotard, Jean-François and Jean-Loup Thébaud. 1985. Just
    Gaming. Trans. Wlad Godzich. Minneapolis: U of
    Minnesota P.
    Malpas, Simon. 2002. “Sublime Ascesis: Lyotard, Art
    and the Event.” Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical
    Humanities 7.1: 199-212.
    Maltby, Paul. 2002. “The Romantic Metaphysics of Don
    DeLillo.” The Visionary Moment. Albany: State
    University of New York Press. 73-84.
    Martins, Susana S. 2005. “White Noise and Everyday
    Technologies.” American Studies 46.1: 87-113.
    Mascaro, John. 1999. “Kant Touch This: Joseph Tabbi’s
    Postmodern Sublime.” Studies in the Novel 31.4: 506-
    15.
    May, Todd. 1997. Reconsidering Difference: Nancy,
    Derrida, Levinas and DeLeuze. University Park, Pa:
    Pennsylvania State UP.
    McClelland, J. S. 1989. The Crowd and the Mob: From Plato
    to Canetti. London: Unwin Hyman.
    McPhall, Clark. 1991. The Myth of the Madding Crowd. New
    York: Aldine de Gruyter.
    Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1960. L’Oeil et l’esprit.
    Trans. James Barry Jr. Paris: Gallimard.
    ---. 1964. The Visible and the Invisible. Trans. James
    Barry Jr. Paris: Gallimard.
    Michaels, Walter Benn. 2003. “Empires of the Senseless:
    (The Response to) Terror and (the End of) History.”
    Radical History Review 85: 105-13.
    Mirchandani, Rekha. 2005. “Postmodernism and Sociology:
    From the Epistemological to the Empirical.”
    Sociological Theory 23.1: 86-115.
    Moran, Joe. 2000. “Don DeLillo and the Myth of the
    Author—Recluse.” Journal of American Studies 34.1:
    137-52.
    Morris, Mathew J. 2001. “Murdering Words: Language in
    Action in Don DeLillo’s The Names.” Contemporary
    Literature 30.1: 113-27.
    Nietzsche, Fredrick. 1983. Untimely Meditations. Trans.
    R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
    ----. 1954. The Portable Nietzsche. Ed. and trans.
    Walter Kaufmann. New York: Viking.
    Nortvedt, Per. 2003. “Subjectivity and Vulnerability:
    Reflections on the Foundation of Ethical
    Sensibility.” Nursing Philosophy 4: 222-30.
    Osteen, Mark, ed. 1999. “Becoming Incorporated:
    Spectacular Authorship and DeLillo’s Mao II.” Modern
    Fiction Studies 45.3: 643-74.
    ----. 1998. White Noise: Text and Criticism. New York:
    Penguin.
    Paik, Peter Yoonsuk. 1999. “Tarkovsky’s Apocalypse and
    the Image of Time.” Religion & the Arts 31.1: 41-63.
    Pearson, Keith Ansell. 1999. Germinal Life: The
    Difference and Repetition of Deleuze. London:
    Routledge.
    Plato. 1994. “Morality as the Advantage of the
    Stronger: A Debate between Socrates and
    Thrasymachus.” Singer 21-26.
    Popke, E. Jeffrey. 2003. “Poststructualist ethics:
    subjectivity, responsibility and the space of
    community.” Progress in Human Geography 27.3: 298-316.
    Pynchon, Thomas. 1997. Vineland. New York: Penguin.
    Quick, Andrew. 1998. “Time and the Event.” Culture
    Values 21: 223-32.
    Radloff, Bernhard. 2002. “Sublime Repetitions.”
    University of Toronto Quarterly 71.2: 674-93.
    Ricoeur, Paul. 1992. Oneself as Another. Trans. Kathleen
    Blamey. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
    Rosenthal, Sandra B. 2003. “A Time for Being Ethical:
    Levinas and Pragmatism.” Journal of Speculative
    Philosophy 17.3: 192-203.
    Russo, John Paul. 2005. The Future without a Past: The
    Humanities in a Technological Society. Columbia: U of
    Missouri P.
    Rychlak, Joseph F. 2003. The Human Image in Postmodern
    America. Washington: American Psychological
    Association.
    Shaw, Rhonda. 2003. “‘Our Bodies, Ourselves’,
    Technology, and the Question of Ethics: Cyberfeminism
    and the Lived Body.” Australian Feminist Studies 18.
    4: 45-55.
    Silverstone, Roger. 1994. Television and Everyday Life.
    London: Routledge.
    Simmons, Ryan. 1999. “What Is a Terrorist? Contemporary
    Authorship, the Unabomber, and Mao II.” Modern
    Fiction Studies 45.3: 675-95.
    Singer, Peter. 1994. “Introduction.” Ethics. Ed.
    Peter Singer. New York: Oxford UP.
    Sontag, Susan. 1990. On Photography. New York: Anchor
    Books.
    Taylor, Mark C, ed. 1986. Deconstruction in Context.
    Chicago: U of Chicago P.
    Tabbi, Joseph. 1995. Postmodern Sublime: Technology and
    American Writing From Mailer to Cyberpunk. New York:
    Cornell.
    Theunissen, Michael. 1984. The Other. Trans. Christopher
    Macann. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    Wall, Thomas Carl. 1999. Radical Passivity. New York: U
    of New York P.
    Wallace, Kathleen. 2003. “Autonmous ‘I’ of an
    Intersectional Self.” Journal of Speculative
    Philosophy 17.3: 176-91.
    William, Lincoln, and Vishanthie Sewpaul.
    2004. “Modernism, Postmodernism and Global Standards
    Setting.” Social Work Education 23.5: 555-65.
    Wise, John Macgregor. 1997. Exploring Technology and
    Social Space. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    Yehnert, Curtis A. 2001. “‘Like Some Endless Sky Waking
    Inside’: Subjectivity in Don DeLillo.” Crtique
    42.4: 357-66.
    Yurick, Sol. 1998. “Fleeing Death in a Word of Hyper-
    babble.” Osteen 365-69.
    Ziarek, Ewa Plonowska. 2001. “Rethinking Dispossession:
    On Being in One’s Skin.” Parallax 7.2: 3-19.

    QR CODE