經驗總是來至於對事物的認識與了解，而事物對我們而言也是感知的意向（Intentionality）來源，在藝術創作的行為中，經驗與感知是真實與藝術之間跨維度與變像的關鍵要素，然而隨著實踐技術與工具的創新，藝術也從傳統逐漸過渡到數位的時代，因此研究一開始著重點，將試圖從哲學與美學的角度探討「物」的意識、感知與存在等等本質問題，並從中分析人、物與世界三者之間的藝術現象與實踐關係，接著研究角度將轉向影像中「物」的修辭與表現探討，透過上述學理研究的基礎建構，將有助於後續藝術實踐的探討，使論述能有連貫與完整的邏輯性。
而有關技術實踐部分，探討焦點將以3D數位技術為核心，並從技術本質與原理做為分析起點，首先在探討技術本質部分，內容包含技術的虛擬性、生成美學、幾何空間等面向研究，在探討技術原理部分，包含數位物件的網格編修、拓樸演變、變像技巧等內容分析，而過程中將適時搭配圖示的輔助說明，來解說技術運用於實踐上的重要觀念，最終再透過分析個人作品過程，將本文中的學理與技術的探討進行聚合與辯證。期盼透過本次的研究與實踐的目的，除了作為自身創作的反思與檢視之外，內容也能成為從事3D數位藝術創作與研究者的參考基礎。
由於本次研究特性屬於創作理論為主，因此在研究方法上，將採用藝術本位研究（arts-based research，以下簡稱ABR）的方法，以創作實踐為基礎，透過文獻研究、案例分析與創作實踐三個面向進行資料的探討與現象的分析，來逐步完成本次論文研究的整體架構。

Experience always comes from the understanding and comprehension of things; things, however, represent for us the sources of perceived intentionality. In the artistic creation, experience and perception are key elements for the transdimension and transformation between reality and arts. However, with the innovation of technology and tools, art comes to the digital epoch from the tradition. Hence, the focus of the study attempts to discuss the issues such as consciousness, perception, and being of “things” from philosophy and aesthetics. From the above issues, the study examines the relations of the artistic phenomenon and practice amid the humans, things, and the world. Then, the study shifts to the discussion on the rhetoric and expression of "things" in images. The above theoretical foundations will be helpful for the follow-up discussion on artistic practice, making the discussion more coherently and concretely logical.
In the discussion of technical practice, the study paper explores the 3D digital technology from the technological essence and principle as the starting point for discussion. First, the study examines the technical essence, including the virtuality, becoming aesthetics, and geometric space for research; the study examines the technical principle, including the mesh editing of digital objects, topological evolution, transfiguration skills. Meanwhile, the study will timely offer auxiliary instructions in order to illustrate important concepts of techniques used in practice. Finally, through the analysis of individual work process, the study will converge and debate the theory and technology of the paper. It is expected through the purpose of this study and practice, the individual work can serve not only as a reflection and review, but also as a reference for 3D digital artists and researchers.
As the focus of the study is devoted mainly to artworks, the study uses ABR (arts-based research) as the methodology based on the artistic practice. Also, through literature research, case analysis and artwork practice, the study embarks on the material discussion and phenomenon analysis in order to build the framework of the study.

中文書籍與期刊：
Bachelard, G.（2003）。空間詩學（龔卓軍譯）。臺北市：張老師文化。
Berger, J.（2002）。影像的閱讀（劉惠媛譯）。臺北市：遠流。
Berger, J.（2010）。觀看的視界（吳莉君譯）。臺北市：麥田。
Bergson, H.（2013）。時間與自由意志（憑怀信譯）。北京市：時代。
Bergson, H.（2020）。創造的進化論（陳聖生譯）。臺北市：五南。
Bogue, R.（2016）。德勒茲論音樂、繪畫與藝術（李育霖、邱漢平、涂銘宏、陳佩筠與林宛瑄譯）。臺北市：麥田。
Churchland, P. M.（1994）。物質與意識–當代心靈哲學導讀（汪益譯）。臺北市：遠流。
Danto, A. C.（2010）。在藝術終結之後：當代藝術與歷史藩籬（林雅琪與鄭惠雯譯）。臺北市：麥田。
Deleuze, G.（2009）。法蘭西斯．培根：感官感覺的邏輯（陳蕉譯）。臺北市：桂冠圖書。
Deleuze, G.、Guattari, F.（2010）。資本主義與精神分裂（卷2）：千高原（姜宇輝譯）。上海市：上海書店。
Dreyfus, H. L.、Rabinow, P.（2005）。傅柯：超越結構主義與詮釋學（錢俊譯）。新北市：桂冠。
Foucault, M.（2012）。這不是一只煙斗。桂林市：灕江。
Groys, B.（2015）。藝術力（郭昭蘭與劉文坤譯）。臺北市：藝術家。
Heidegger, M.（2016）。物的追問（趙衛國譯）。上海市：上海譯文。
Husserl, E.（2017）。現象學的觀念（黃文宏譯）。新竹市：國立清華大學出版社。
Ihde, D.（2008）。讓事物說話-後現象學與技術科學（韓連慶譯）。北京市：北京大學。
Ihde, D.（2012）。技術與生活世界–從伊甸園到塵世（韓連慶譯）。北京市：北京大學出版社。
Jean-LucChalumea（1996）。藝術解讀（王玉齡譯）。台北市：遠流。
Köhler, W.（1998）。完形心理學（李嬌嬌譯）。臺北市：桂冠。
Koren, L.（2014）。擺放的方式：安排物件的修辭。臺北市：行人文化實驗室。
Leibniz, G. W.（2009）。單子論（錢志純譯）。臺北市：五南。
Norberg-Schulz, C.（1995）。場所精神︰邁向建築現象學（施植明譯）。臺北市：田園。
Pivčević, E.（1991）。胡賽爾與現象學（廖仁義譯）。臺北市：桂冠。
QRanciere, J.（2011）。影像的宿命（國立編譯館與黃建宏譯）。臺北市：典藏藝術家庭。
Sartre, J.-P.（2012）。存在與虛無L'être et le néant（陳宣良譯）。新北市：左岸。
Sokolowski, R.（2004）。現象學十四講 Introduction to Phenomenology（李維倫譯）。臺北市：心靈工坊。
Wilczek, F.（2017）。萬物皆數——諾貝爾物理獎得主探索宇宙深層設計之美（周念縈譯）。臺北市：貓頭鷹。
Yi-Fu Tuan（1998）。經驗透視中的空間和地方（潘桂成）。臺北市：國立編譯館。
王理平（2007）。差異與綿延–柏格森哲學及當代命運。北京市：人民出版社。
名倉真紀、今野紀雄（2020）。拓樸學超入門：從克萊茵瓶到宇宙的形狀 ざっくりわかるトポロジー（衛宮紘譯）。新北市：世茂。
李顯傑（2005）。電影修辭學：鏡像與話語。北京市：文化藝術。
汪文聖（2001）。現象學與科學哲學。臺北市：五南。
周冬瑩（2012a）。影像與時間–德勒茲的影像理論與柏格森、尼采的時間哲學。北京市：中國電影出版社。
周冬瑩（2012b）。影像與時間：德勒茲的影像理論與柏格森．尼采的時間哲學。北京市：中國電影。
孟悅、羅綱（2008）。物質文化讀本。北京市：北京大學。
季桂保（2002）。布希亞。新北市：揚智文化。
張燦輝（2019）。海德格與胡塞爾現象學。臺北市：東大。
陳永國（2011）。游牧思想-吉爾.德勒茲 費利克斯.瓜塔里讀本。長春市：吉林人民。
陳國棟 （2006）。試探羅蘭巴特之敘述觀念。中正歷史學刊，8。
陳榮華（2011）。高達美詮釋學：真理與方法導讀。臺北市：三民。
陳懷恩（2008）。圖像學：視覺藝術的意義與解釋。臺北市：如果。
麥永雄（2013）。德勒茲哲性詩學：跨語境理論意義。廣西桂林市：廣西師範大學。
曾肅良（2008）。藝術概論 An Interoduction to Arts。臺北市：三藝文化。
楊凱麟 （2003）。德勒茲 [思想-影像] 或 [思想= 影像] 之條件及問題性。臺大文史哲學報，59。
楊凱麟（2014）。起源與重複：德勒茲哲學的差異問題性[Genesis and Repetition: The Problem of Difference in Gilles Deleuze]。政治大學哲學學報（31）。
葉郁田（2015）。尚‧布希亞的超真實觀點：其觀點與當代藝術創作的再現問題--真實性的建構 The Concept of the Hyperreal in Jean Baudrillard: His Views on the Problem of Representation in Contemporary Art and the Structure of Reality。現代美術學報，29。
臺灣建築學會（2015）。臺灣建築學會刊雜誌 10月號。臺北市：聯華書報社。
劉文潭（1997）。現代美學。新北市。
蔡宗陽（2001）。應用修辭學。臺北市：萬卷樓。
謝攸青 （2015）。藝術的創造思維與超越: 德勒茲的 [差異] 理論之啟示。現代美術學報。
魏光莒（2006）。『生活世界』--由『視域』理論到『場域』理念。環境與藝術期刊，4。

外文書籍與期刊：
Angenot, V. (2014). Semiotics and Hermeneutics. In A Companion to Ancient Egyptian Art.
Antony, M. V. (2002). Concepts of Consciousness, Kinds of Consciousness, Meanings of 'Consciousness'. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 109(1), 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4321262
Aristotle. (1926). The “Art” of Rhetoric; Aristotle with an English translation. United States: William Heinemann.
Bach, K. (2003). Context ex Machina. Semantics vs. Pragmatics. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199251520.001.0001
Bergson, H. (1991). Matter and memory (N. M. Paul & W. S. Palmer, Trans.). United States: Courier Corporation.
Bergson, H., & Pogson, F. L. (2001). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness: Courier Corporation.
Bible, H. (1899). Douay-Rheims Version. Baltimore, Md., John Murphy Co.
Brady, M. (2002). A Platonic Defense of Rhetoric. Mediterranean Studies, 11, 1-18. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41166935
Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives: Univ of California Press.
Burks, D. M. (1968). John Dewey and rhetorical theory. Western Speech, 32(2), 118-126. doi:10.1080/10570316809389560
Carruthers, P. (2000). Phenomenal consciousness and language. In P. Carruthers (Ed.), Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory (pp. 271-296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crick, N. (2014). Rhetoric and Events. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 47(3), 251-272. doi:10.5325/philrhet.47.3.0251
Domínguez, M. (2015). Evolution of metaphors
Phylogeny of oil slick cartoons in Spanish press. Discourse & Society, 26(2), 184-204. doi:10.2307/26865798
Eco, U. (1979). A theory of semiotics (Vol. 217): Indiana University Press.
Eyman, D. (2015). Defining and Locating Digital Rhetoric. In Digital Rhetoric (pp. 12-60): University of Michigan Press.
Føllesdal, D. (1990). Noema and Meaning in Husserl. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 50, 263-271. doi:10.2307/2108043
Fehér, I. M. (2015). Hermeneutics and Humanism. In A Companion to Hermeneutics.
Fine, G. (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Plato: OUP USA.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Frith, C. D. (2012). The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2213-2223. doi:doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0123
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive science, 7(2), 155-170.
Grabau, R. F. (1963). Kant's Concept of the Thing in Itself: An Interpretation. The Review of Metaphysics, 16(4), 770-779. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20123973
Harman, G. (2009). Technology, objects and things in Heidegger. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 17-25. doi:10.1093/cje/bep021
Heidegger, M. (1994). Bremer und Freiburger Vorträge. Germany: Vittorio Klostermann Frankfurt Main.
Hunter, S., Pollock, J., & Karpel, B. (1956). Jackson Pollock. The Bulletin of the Museum of Modern Art, 24(2), 3-36.doi:10.2307/4058271
Indregard, J. (2018). Consciousness as Inner Sensation: Crusius and Kant. Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 5. doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.007
James, W. (1890). The Principles of psychology (Vol. 1): Global Grey.
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, J. J., & Fodor, J. A. (1963). The Structure of a Semantic Theory. Language, 39(2), 170-210. doi:10.2307/411200
Kellett, H. (2017). Skin Portraiture: Embodied Representations in Contemporary Art.
Krajewski, B. (2015). Hermeneutics and Rhetoric. In A Companion to Hermeneutics.
Langhorne, E. (2012). Jackson Pollock: The Sin of Images. In Meanings of Abstract Art Between Nature and Theory (Vol. 2, pp. 160-180): Routledge.
Laughlin, C. D., & Tiberia, V. A. (2012). Archetypes: Toward a Jungian Anthropology of Consciousness. Anthropology of Consciousness, 23(2), 127-157. doi:10.1111/j.1556-3537.2012.01063.x
Marshall, C. (2013). Kant's appearance and things in themself AS QUA-OBJ. The Philosophical Quarterly, 63(252), 26. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24672489
McAdon, B. (2003). Probabilities, Signs, Necessary Signs, Idia, and Topoi: The Confusing Discussion of Materials for Enthymemes in the "Rhetoric". Philosophy & Rhetoric, 36(3), 223-247. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40238152
Palamidese, P. (1996). A Camera Motion Metaphor Based on Film Grammar. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 7(2), 61-78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1778(199604)7:2<61::AID-VIS142>3.0.CO;2-3
Palkoska, J. (2010). Substance and Intelligibility in Leibniz's Metaphysics.
Quine, W. V. (2019). Science and Sensibilia by W. V. Quine. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ryan, F. X. (1997). The "Extreme Heresy" of John Dewey and Arthur F. Bentley II: "Knowing Knowing and the Known". Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 33(4), 1003-1023. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40320655
Saussure, F. d. (1983). Course in General Linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). London: Duckworth.
Schiffer, S. (1976). Descartes on His Essence. The Philosophical Review, 85(1), 21-43. doi:10.2307/2184253
Scott, D. (2006). The “concept of time” and the “being of the clock”: Bergson, Einstein, Heidegger, and the interrogation of the temporality of modernism. Continental Philosophy Review, 39(2), 183-213. doi:10.1007/s11007-006-9023-4
Shanken, E. A. (2016). Contemporary Art and New Media. In A Companion to Digital Art.
Smith, A. D. (2008). Husserl and Externalism. Synthese, 160(3), 313-333. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27653668
Smith, R. A. (1993). Editorial: The Power of Vision: In Praise of Rudolf Arnheim. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 27(4), 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3333496
Solms, M., & Friston, K. (2018). How and why consciousness arises: Some considerations from physics and physiology. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(5-6), 202-238.
Tepe, P. (2011). Cognitive hermeneutics: The better alternative. Discourse Studies, 13(5), 601-608. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24049951
Tileagă, C. (2011). Context, mental models and discourse analysis. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(1), 124-134. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00475.x
Tononi, G., & Koch, C. (2015). Consciousness: here, there and everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1668). doi:doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0167
Tye, M. (2017). Philosophical Problems of Consciousness. In The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness.
Warlick, M. E. (1992). Mythic Rebirth in Gustav Klimt's Stoclet Frieze: New Considerations of Its Egyptianizing Form and Content. The Art Bulletin, 74(1), 115-134. doi:10.2307/3045853
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-Analysis of Theory-of-Mind Development: The Truth about False Belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655-684. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1132444
Wood, A. (2013). Talking about Maya.
Wood, A. (2015). Software, Animation and the Moving Image: What's in the Box? : Springer.
Yoshitake, M. (2013). What is Mono-ha? Review of Japanese Culture and Society, 25(25), 202-213.