這項研究以消費者購買家具和家飾品的意願作為主要研究對象，旨在探討如何透過產品特性來提高消費者對這些產品的購買意願。近年來，受到疫情的影響，人們在家中度過的時間增加，居家辦公、居家運動、以及居家生活等日常活動都在家裡完成，因此對於家具和家飾品的重要性也更加凸顯。
本研究旨在探討當消費者選購家具和家飾品時，哪些產品特性對其購買意願影響最大。該研究的目的是為相關產業或有興趣的業者提供進貨採購上的參考和建議。我們透過文獻搜索和層級分析，比較了十種主要的產品特性，包括「材質」、「設計」、「功能」、「品牌」、「價格」、「生產國」、「流行性/美觀」、「耐用程度」、「配送管道」和「退換貨服務」。採用問卷調查和層級分析（Analytic Hierarchy Process，AHP），我們建立了評估這些十種產品特性相對重要性的問卷層級分析模型。
從研究結果顯示，消費者在選購家具家飾品時，最優先考慮的產品特性依次為材質（23.0%）、功能（18.2%）、品牌（13.4%）、設計（13.1%）、價格（9.3%）、耐用程度（8.6%）、生產國（5.3%）、流行性（4.5%）、退換貨（2.4%）和最低配送管道（2.2%）。根據上述權重評估，我們可以看出這十種產品特性都會影響消費者在選購家具家飾品時的考慮因素。其中，材質和功能被認為是最重要的因素，消費者通常會以產品的材質和功能來評估產品的品質和價值。品牌、設計和價格也是消費者在選購過程中考慮的重要因素，它們影響消費者的購買決策和滿意度。其他因素對消費者的影響程度較低，但仍然具有一定的重要性。然而，進一步針對性別來做權重，得出結果為女性較注重流行性（23.2%），男性則著重於材質（19.0%）和功能（18.8%）。這些結果對於相關產業和業者來說是有價值的，他們可以根據這些研究結果來了解消費者的需求和偏好，並在產品的設計、行銷和銷售策略中做出相應的調整，以提高產品的競爭力和滿意度。

This study explores consumer purchasing intent for furniture and home decor products and examines the impact of product attributes. The study acknowledges the increased significance of furniture and home decor due to the pandemic and the increased time spent at home.
This study examines how product attributes influence consumer purchasing decisions for furniture and home decor. It offers valuable insights for industries and businesses in terms of procurement and purchasing strategies. The research utilized literature review and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to analyze ten key attributes, such as material, design, functionality, brand, price, country of production, trendiness/appearance, durability, delivery channels, and return/exchange services. A hierarchical analysis model was developed using a questionnaire survey and AHP to evaluate the relative importance of these attributes.
The research results indicate that when consumers purchase furniture and home decor, the most prioritized product attributes are material (23.0%), functionality (18.2%), brand (13.4%), design (13.1%), price (9.3%), durability (8.6%), country of production (5.3%), trendiness (4.5%), return/exchange policies (2.4%), and delivery channels (2.2%). Based on the weighted evaluations, it is evident that all ten product attributes influence consumers' considerations when selecting furniture and home decor. Material and functionality are considered the most important factors as consumers typically assess product quality and value based on these attributes. Brand, design, and price are also significant factors influencing consumers' purchasing decisions and satisfaction. Other factors have a relatively lower impact on consumers but still hold a certain level of importance. However, a further analysis focusing on gender reveals that women prioritize trendiness (23.2%) while men place more emphasis on material (19.0%). These findings provide valuable insights for industries and businesses, enabling them to align their product design or marketing with consumer needs and preferences.

數位時代1．取自 https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/48705/furniture-and-homewares-rising-star-of-ecommerce
行政院統計處（2022）．取自https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/bulletin/Bulletin.aspx?kind=9&html=1&menu_id=18808&bull_id=9673
中時新聞（2022）．取自 https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20220329004704-260410?chdtv
許宏榮（2001）．台北市居家用品商品印象與購買行為關之研究．高雄第一科大學行銷與流通管理研究所碩士論文。
周文賢、張欽富（2000）．聯合分析在產品設計之運用．台北：華泰書局。
劉純婷（2010）．體驗行銷、生活型態與品牌權之間的關:以居家用品店為例．政治大學企業管理研究所學位論文。
黃耀南（2012）．居家修繕及家飾用品零售業之經營模式探討:特力屋零售事業群為例．清華大學高階主管經營管理碩士在職專班學位文。
盧相瑞（2014）．台灣電子商務市場發展方向研究:居家生活用品為例．政治大學經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)學位論文。
姚成彥（2015）．虛實整合：特力屋電子商務的服務創新．中山管理評論 ，23（1）， 377-409。
陳榮文（2013）．價格因素影響創新產品購買意願之研究．淡江大學管理科學學系企業經營碩士在職專班碩士論文。
李凰寧、林振陽、李安勝（2008）．依產品設計觀點探討消費者購買意願之研究．應用藝術與設計學報，3。
陳品如（2014）．產品屬性、參考群體、涉入程度與消費者購買決策之研究－以海洋深層水為例．國立高雄大學亞太工商管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
周芳達（2014）．產品屬性與知覺價值對購買意向影響之研究─以行動應用軟體 (APP)為例．中國科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
林添正（2011）．品牌形象、產品屬性對產品認知及購買意願之研究:以統一超商 CITY-CAFE 為例．長庚大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
劉水深（1984）．產品規格化與策略應用．台北:華泰書局。
鄧無畏（2005）．居家用品店客戶滿意度與忠誠度關析之研究:以特立和樂為例．中山管理評論，23(1)，377-409。
Aaker, D. A., & Shansby, J. G. (1982). Positioning your product. Business horizons, 25(3), 56-62.
Chaubey, A. K., Vishwavidyalaya, H. G., & Sagar, S. (2015). Choice Based Credit System (CBCS): A better choice in education system. International Journal Of Creative Research Thoughts, 3(6), 1-13.
Dhar, R., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). The effect of common and unique features in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(3), 193-203.
Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of advertising, 29(3), 43-54.

Kotler, P. & Keller, K. L. (2015). Social marketing: Changing behaviors for good. Sage Publications.
Kotler, P. (1998). Marketing Management Millennium edition, N.J.:Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P. (2001). Marketing management, millenium edition. Prentice-Hall, Inc..
Kostyra, D. S., Reiner, J., Natter, M., & Klapper, D. (2016). Decomposing the effects of online customer reviews on brand, price, and product attributes. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(1), 11-26.
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2010). Principles of Marketing, Upper SaddleRiver. New Jer-Sey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Lefkoff-Hagius, R., & Mason, C. H. (1993). Characteristic, beneficial, and image attributes in consumer judgments of similarity and preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 100-110..
Olson, J. C., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Cue utilization in the quality perception process. ACR Special Volumes.
Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1993). Consumer behavior and marketing strategy. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin. Inc.
Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & MacInnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of marketing, 50(4), 135-145.
Swan, J. E., & Combs, L. J. (1976). Product performance and consumer satisfaction: a new concept: an empirical study examines the influence of physical and psychological dimensions of product performance on consumer satisfaction. Journal of marketing, 40(2), 25-33.
Wei, L., & Yu, J. (2013). The Logical Structure of the E-Commerce Platform Design and External Interfaces to Achieve of Online to Offline