網路的發達使得近年來數位學習的拓展快速，加上開放內容(Open Content)的推廣，透過網路無償取得知識成為可能。開放式課程(OpenCourseWare，OCW)即為此概念下的產物，學習者透過網路可取得各高等教育機構實際上課的課程內容、教材等學習資源。OCW主要訴求為教材完全公開無償取用，廣納百川，來自任何地方、任何背景的使用者都能使用，而開放式課程發展至今，各校均建立自己的課程特色。在不同課程特色的平台下會吸引何種使用者，而使用者的使用特性及對平台的滿意度是開放式課程發展中重要的議題之一，本研究以國立臺灣師範大學與國立交通大學兩校為調查對象，以問卷調查法調查兩平台之使用者使用動機、使用情形及滿意度，並以內容分析法分析兩校平台之網路日誌(log)檔資料，分析出兩校的十大課程類型、不同時段間的觀看人數及點擊數落差以及課程的持續觀看行為。
研究結果發現，兩平台使用者的使用動機皆以興趣為主，其中學生族群在課業上的應用較多，但在職人士不一定是為了工作需求；而使用者觀看情況部分，兩平台都出現在非學期期間的觀看數與人數明顯比學期期間來得少之情形，但除了單一課程觀看單元數方面之外，交大使用者在觀看頻率及使用課程數皆比師大使用者頻繁，且觀看頻率的頻繁與否皆與是否受到他人推薦無關；觀看類型的部分，兩平台使用者皆出現跨學科領域觀看之情形，不同之處在於理工取向的交大會出現理工背景與商管背景互相使用課程之情形，而師大則是文學與教育類型有來自許多其他不同背景的使用者使用，但皆偏好於專業課程的使用是兩平台較為一致的部分；在對OCW平台的意見部分，兩平台使用者仍肯定實體課程的重要性，但交大使用者認為交大OCW可作為實體課程的短期替代方案，而師大使用者仍認為實體課程無法被取代，但使用者對於OCW仍有很高的使用意願。最後兩平台使用者皆認為課程的豐富程度以及影音資源的提供、品質需要加強。
根據以上研究結果，本研究最後提出平台經營及未來研究方向之建議，作為以開放式課程使用者行為研究及OCW平台經營之參考。

In recent years, the development of internet promoted the rapid expansion of e-learning, and the promotion of Open Content make knowledge acquired free easier by internet. OpenCourseWare is the outcome of these concepts , learners can acquire any learning content, material from institutions of higher education which developed OCW by internet. The main demands of OCW are anyone can acquire learning material, and learners from different background can use these materials. So far every institution which develop OCW have their own course characteristic, and what kinds of user will attracted to use these different OCW , and the usability and their satisfication of users on OCW are the important things on OCW development. The research objects are the OCW platforms of National Taiwan Normal University and National Chiao-Tung University, users were investigated their using motivations, utilizations and satisfication of the two OCW platforms by questionnaire, and analysis the web site log of the two OCW site to understand the curriculum department, number of users and clicks, and the continuity of using the top 10 courses.
This study revealed that users’ main motivation of OCW is habit, and students will use it for their lessons or class selection, but for on-the-job users, using OCW for jobs is not the main reason. The clicks and user number of the two sites during the vacation are less than the semester period apparently, but the using frequency and using curriculum numbers of NCTU OCW are more than NTNU, and it’s unconcerned with using frequency and using by anyone’s recommend. Most of users can watch courses which are not majored in, in NCTU, users who major in science or engineer can use the business or management course, and the users major in business and management also use the science or engineer courses, in contrast the users of NTNU from different discipline focus on liteture or educations curriculums. On the comments of users, all users approve the importance of reality curriculums, but users using NCTU OCW consider it can substitute for user’s absence of reality curriculums, in contrast the NTNU OCW users think reality curriculums can’t replaced by OCW, but users are willing to using OCW. On user’s response, most users consider the kinds of curriculums and the serve and quality of video materials must be improved.
Accroding the results of this study stated above, the OCW platform operation and recommendation on research topics were purposed as reference for research on the user behavior and the operation of OCW.

中文部分
Neuman, W.L.(2006) 當代社會研究法(王佳煌、潘中道譯)。台北市：學富文化。
于第、林玉美、何定禧(2010). 從科技大學教師看法探討數位教學與數位學習需求對圖書館服務之影響. 教育資料與圖書館學， 47(4)，429-458.
王佑哲(2009)。行動學習的世代來臨。[部落格文字資料]。取自
http://elearning.iiiedu.org.tw/node/335
王珮儀(2008)。創用CC授權之法律理論與實務分析(未出版碩士論文)。國立台灣大學法律學研究所，台北市。
江易元(2010)。簡介創用 CC 授權之物理數位教材與淺談其元件釋出方式。[部落格文字資料]。取自http://creativecommons.org.tw/blog/archives/000203.html
吳美美(2004)。數位學習現況與未來發展. 圖書館學與資訊科學，30(2)，92-106.
林信志、湯凱雯、賴信志(2010)。以科技接受模式探討大學生學習以網路教學系統製作數位教材之意圖和成效。數位學習科技期刊。2(1)，60-78
林凱胤、楊子瑩、王國華(2009)。 融入混成學習與知識移轉策略實習輔導模式之成效評估。科學教育學刊，17(4)，293-318
邱炯友、蔣欣樺(2005)。學術出版傳播之Open Access模式。中華民國圖書館學會會報，74，165-183
邱皓政(2008)。量化研究法(二) 統計原理與分析技術。台北市：雙葉書廊
周宣光、文德蘭、黃彥穎(2004)。中小企業採用自由軟體發展資訊系統之探索性研究。大葉學報，13(2)，9-18
李海碩(2010)。開放式課程(OpenCourseWare)在台灣：交通大學開放式課程之起源、影響、以及台灣開放式課程之發展(未出版碩士論文)。國立交通大學教育研究所，新竹市。
翁榮茂(2008)。以TAM及資訊系統成功模式探討線上輔助教學平台之功能設計。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東科技大學資訊管理系，屏東縣。
國立交通大學開放式課程(2010)。國立交通大學開放式課程，取自http://ocw.nctu.edu.tw/
國立臺灣師範大學圖書館(2010)。國立臺灣師範大學開放式課程，取自http://ocw.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/
葉仲達(2008)。以整合科技接受模式探討網路學習工具之使用-以WebCT為例(未出版碩士論文)。淡江大學資訊管理學系碩士班，新北市。
陳舜玲(2004)。Creative Commons : 數位內容授權方式的新取向。
取自 http://creativecommons.org.tw/static/about/cc
陳志銘、陳勇汀、林筱芳(2010)。通識教育開放式課程數位典藏建置之研究。大學圖書館，14(2)，83-112
陳淑君等(2006)。以文建會為例導入TWLOM經驗分享。數位學習標準導入經驗暨應用研討會。2006年9月29日，台北市：國立臺灣師範大學。取自http://metadata.teldap.tw/bibliography/proceeding/cs060929.pdf
湯光明(2008)。以科技接受模式探討原住民成人數位學習之研究-以原住民族網路學院為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學成人與繼續教育研究所，南投縣。
馮建中(2010)。運用Wii Remote建置電子白板之教學環境發展(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學教育科技學系，台北縣。
曾瑞譙(2008)。電腦輔助教學軟體使用後之效益分析──科技接受模式的觀點與應用。新竹教育大學教育學報。26(2)，127-164。
劉耀明(2007)。學習風格在數位學習環境中對學習成效及學習態度影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學資訊管理研究所，嘉義市。
教育部(2008)，教育部通識教育資源平台建構與永續發展計畫，取自
http://www.edu.tw/plannews_detail.aspx?sn=338&pages=8
廖婉如(2009)。我國1998至2007年數位學習論文及其引用文獻分析之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系，台北市。
游孝慈(2007)。我國大學圖書館支援數位學習之研究。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系，台北市。
楊正宏、林燕珍、張俊陽、曾憲雄(2008)。台灣高等教育數位學習現況與展望. 數位學習科技期刊. 1(1),1~12。
臺灣開放式課程聯盟(2008)。 取自 http://www.tocwc.org.tw/index.php
鄒景平（2003）。數位學習概論。數位學習最佳指引。台北市：資策會教育處。
趙爵聘(2009). 數位學習與經驗的傳承~歐洲的努力(一)。數位典藏與學習電子報 。取自http://newsletter.teldap.tw/index.php?lid=306
趙爵聘(2009). 數位學習與經驗的傳承~歐洲的努力(二)。數位典藏與學習電子報 。取自http://newsletter.teldap.tw/index.php?lid=325
謝惠雯(2010)。開放式課程教材之著作權問題研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所，台北市 。
 
英文部分
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M.(1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
Allan, I. Lukoseviciute-Noreikiene(2008). Quality Assessment of a Blended Studies Course in the Context of Open Learning Ideas: A Case Study. Quality of Higher Education, 5, 94-131.
Apple(n.d.). What’s on iTuneU. Refrived From http://www.apple.com/education/itunes-u/whats-on.html
Arendt, A.M.(2009). An Assessment of Utah Resident Incentives and Discentives for Use of OpenCourseWare (Master’s thesis, Utah State University). Retrived From http://gradworks.umi.com/3359873.pdf
Arendt, A.M., Shelton, B.E.(2009). Incentives and Disincentives for the Use of OpenCourseWare. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5). Retrived From http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/download/746/1409
Atkins, D.E., Brown, J.S.,&Hammond.,A.L. (2007). A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities. Retrived from
http://www.hewlett.org/uploads/files/Hewlett_OER_report.pdf
Baldi,S., Heier,H., & Mehler-Bicher, A.(2003). COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 46(9), 105-107
Baldi, S., Heier. H., & Stanzick, F.(2002). OpenCourseWare VS Open Source Software – A Critical Comparison. 10th European Conference on Information Systems, 1375–1383.
Chang,C. Y., Sheu, J.P., & Chen, T.W. (2003).Concept and design of Ad Hoc and mobile classrooms. Journal of computer assisted Learning, 19, 336-346
Chang, S.C., & Tung, F. C. (2008). An empirical investigation of students’ behavioral intentions to use the online learning course websites, British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 71-83
Chen, C.Y., Chang, R.E., Hung, M.C., & Lin, M.H. (2009). Assessing the Quality of a Web-based Learning System for Nurses.Journal of Medical Systems, 33(4), 317-325
Chen, H. J. (2010). Linking employees’ e-learning system use to their overall job outcomes: Anempirical study based on the IS success model. Computers & Education, 55, 1628-1639
Chiu, C.M., Chiu, C.S. and Chang, H.C. (2007) Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners' satisfaction and Web-based learning continuance intention. Information Systems Journal, 17(3), 271–287.
D’Antoni, S. (2007). Open Educational Resources: reviewing initiatives and issues, Open Learning, 24(1), 3-10.
Davis,F.D., Bagozzi,R.P.,& Warshaw, P.R.(1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003
DeLone, W.H.,& McLean, E.R (1992). Information systems success： The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95
DeLone, W.H.,& McLean, E.R.(2003). The DeLone and McLean model of Information systems success: A ten-year update’, Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30
Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3. Retrieved from http://www.ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p029-044Downes.pdf
Fini, A.(2009). The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 10(5). Retrived from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/643/1402
Fukuhara, Y.(2008). Current Status of OCW in Japan. Proc. of APRU 9th Distance Learning and the Internet Conference 2008, 19-22, November 2008, 221-223. Retrived From http://www.waseda.jp/DLI2008/program/proceedings/pdf/session8-4.pdf
Garrison, D.R., & Kanuka, H.(2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105
Gazer, G. (2007). Open Educational Practices and Resources. OLCOS Roadmap 2012. OLCOS project report. Retrived From http://www.olcos.org/cms/upload/docs/olcos_roadmap.pdf
Graham, C.R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In: C.J. Bonk and C.R. Graham, Editors, The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA. 3–21
Ghalib, M. A.M., Chandrashekara, M., & Talawar, V.G.(2009). Awareness and Extent of Utilisation of Web-based Open Source e-Learning Coursewares among Educators and Students.Journal of Library & Information Technology,29(3), 43-48.
Halonen, R., Acton, T., Golden, W., Conboy, K.,(2009). DeLone & McLean success model as a descriptive tool in evaluating the use of a virtual learning environment. International Conference on Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities (OLKC 2009) , Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Retrived From http://www.feweb.vu.nl/olkc2009/Papers/4DRaijaHalonen.pdf
Hardin, J., & Canero, A.(2010). Faculty and Student Perspectives Toward Open Courseware, and Open Access Publishing: Some Comparisons Between European and North American Populations. Open ED 2010 Proceedings, Barcelona. Retrived From http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/bitstream/10609/5261/6/Hardin_editat.pdf
Hatakka, M.(2009). Build it and They Will Come? – Inhibiting Factors for Reuse of Open Content in Developing Countries, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 37. Retrived From http://www.ejisdc.org/ojs2.../index.php/ejisdc/article/view/545/279
Huang, S.M., Wei, C.W., Yu, P.T., & Kuo, T.Y. (2006).An empirical investigation on learners' acceptance of e-learning for public unemployment vocational training.International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 3(2), 174-185
Huijser,H., Bedford, T., Bull, D.(2008). OpenCourseWare, Global Access and the Right to Education: Real access or marketing ploy?. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1), 1-13. Retrived from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/download/446/1008
Hylen, J. (2005). Open Educational Resources: Opportunities and Chellenges. OECD-CERI, Retrived From http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/49/35733548.doc
Johnstone, S.M.(2005). Open Educational Resources Serve the World. Educause Quarterly, 3, 15-18
Joyce, A. (2006). OECD study : forum report. Retrived from
http://www.schoolforge.net/IIEP_OECD_OER_forum_report.pdf
Kao,C.P., Tsai, C.C. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes toward web-based professional development, with relationto Internet self-efficacy and beliefs about web-based learning.Computers & Education, 53, 66-73.
Karaali, D., Gumussoy, C.A., & Calisir, F. (2010). Factors affecting the intention to use a web-based learning system among blue-collar workers in the automotive industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 343-354.
Karren, T.(2006). eLearning 2.0：eLearning Technology[Web blog message]. Retrived from http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2006/02/what-is-elearning-20.html
Laouris, Y., & Eteokleous , N. (2005). We need an Educationally Relevant Definition of Mobile Learning. Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on mLearning . October 25-28, Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from
http://www.mlearn.org.za/CD/papers/Laouris%20&%20Eteokleous.pdf
Lee, B.C.,Yoon , J.O. , Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education, 53, 1320-1329.
Lee, J.K. & Lee, W.K.(2008). The relationship of e-Learner’s self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e-Learning environmental quality, Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1) , 32-47.
Lee, Y.C. (2006), "An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e-learning system", Online Information Review, 30(5), 517-541.
Lin, H. F. (2007). Measuring online learning systems success: Applying the updated DeLone and McLean model, CyberPsychology& Behavior, 10(6), 817-820
Lowman, A.(2009). OpenCourseWare and the Self‐Learner. Open and Libraries Class Journal, 1(2). Retrived from
http://infosherpas.com/ojs/index.php/openandlibraries/article/view/30/45.
MIT OCW(n.d.). Retrived from http://ocw.mit.edu/
Miyagawa, S.(2005). OpenCourseWare Beyond MIT. In E. MURRA(Eds.) LINC3rd AnnualInternational Symposium:“Impacting Social and EconomicDevelopment Through E-Learning”(pp.168-172). Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Learning International Networks Consortium, MIT
Moore, A.H. (2002). Lens on the Future : Open-Source learning", Educause Review, Boulder, Sep/Oct 2002, 37(2), 42-51
Newmarch, J. (2001). Lessons from Open Source: Intellectual property and courseware. First Monda , 6(6). Retrieved From: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue6_6/newmarch/index.html
Next Generation Learning (n.d.).About us. Retrived from
http://www.nextgenerationlearning.org.uk/AboutUs/
Ngai, E.W.T., Poon, J.K.L., & Chan, Y.H.C. (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM.Computers & Education, 48, 250-267
Ong, C.S. , Lai, J.Y. (2004). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance.Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 816-829
Open Content (n.d.).Definition. Retrived From
http://www.opencontent.org/definition/
OpenCouseWare Consortium (n.d.). What is OpenCourseWare? Retrived From http://www.ocwconsortium.org/en/aboutus/whatisocw
Parasuraman, A. , Zeithaml, Valarie A., & Berry, Leonard L. (1988), SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for MeasuringCustomer Perceptions of Service Quality.Journal of Retailing,64(Spring), 12–40
Poleman, S., Wessa, P., Milis, K., Bloemen, E., & Doom, C.(2008). Usability and Acceptance of E-learning in Statistics Education, Based on the Cmpendium Platform. Retrieved from.
http://www.wessa.net/download/iceripaper1.pdf
Quinn (2000). mLearning: Mobile, wireless, in your pocket learning. LineZine, Fall 2000. Retrived From http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/cqmmwiyp.htm
Raaij, S. (2006). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment China.Computers & Education, 50(3), 838-852
Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 44(1), 5-27
Saade, R., & Bahli, B. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42, 317-327.
Schuwer, R. (2006). The OER-project at the Open University of the Netherlands: Towards open content for self-learners. Retrived from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/4/53/38149140.pdf
Taylor, J.C. (2007). Open Courseware Futures: Creating a Parallel Universe. Retrived from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/e-jist/docs/vol10_no1/papers/full_papers/taylorj.htm
United Nations General Assembly (2000). Milennium Declaration, Retrived From http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.pdf
U.S. Department of Education (2010). Retrived from http://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/NETP-2010-exec-summary.pdf
Valiathan (2002). Blended Learning Models. ASTD, Retrived from http://www.astd.org
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.(2000)A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. 46(2), 186-204.
Vest, C. (2006). Open Content and the emerging global meta-university. Educause review, 18-30.
Wang, W.T., & Wang, C.C. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 761-774.
Wang,Y.S., Wang,H.Y.,& Shee, D.Y. (2007).Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1792-1808.
WikiEducation(2010a). Exemplary Collection of Institutions with OER Policy http://wikieducator.org/Exemplary_Collection_of_institutions_with_OER_policy
WikiEducation(2010b). Launch of the OER Foundation. Retrived From http://wikieducator.org/Launch_of_the_OER_foundation
Wixom, B.H. & Todd, P.A.(2005). A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfication and Technology Acceptance. Information System Research, 16(1), 85-102