研究生: |
宋祖睿 Sung, Zu-Jui |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
E. B. 懷特烏托邦理想的呈現 Utopia in Elwyn Brooks White’s Charlotte’s Web |
指導教授: |
黃涵榆
Huang, Han-Yu |
口試委員: |
黃涵榆
Huang, Han-Yu 戴宇呈 Tai, Yu-Chen 賴維菁 Lai, Wei-Ching |
口試日期: | 2024/07/24 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
英語學系 Department of English |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 52 |
中文關鍵詞: | 埃爾文•布魯克斯•懷特 、《夏綠蒂的網》 、兒童文學 、烏托邦理論 、自然循環 、動物與人關係 、社會關懷 |
英文關鍵詞: | Elwyn Brooks White, Charlotte’s Web, children’s literature, Utopian Theory, natural cycles, animal and human relationships, social care |
研究方法: | 紮根理論法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401114 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:102 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在1952年出版的《夏綠蒂的網》作品中,埃爾文•布魯克斯•懷特(E. B. White)採用動物擬人的語言文字作為對話溝通工具,並描寫美國四季風貌與生命自然循環的敘事手法作為架構,構築了一種脫離歷史的生活,因為作品中沒有提及第二次世界大戰(1939年至1945年)。這種方法在社會動盪中提供了個人慰藉,有助於鞏固美國家庭與農場的價值和情感。本文主要以分析《夏綠蒂的網》(Charlotte’s Web)來探討E. B. 懷特所描繪的替代現實中動物與人類角色發展之間的互動關係。首先,我以烏托邦理論架構分析兒童文學作品,特別是露絲•萊維塔斯(Ruth Levitas)的社會想像重構理論,並闡述為何兒童角色的探問與追求並不愚昧,進而探究烏托邦的動態社會關懷與塑造進程中想像與現實的衝突。在E. B. 懷特的兒童文學作品中,讀者可以看到,想像敘事的力量以及兒童天真行為與情感也在情節發展中不可忽視。本文旨在分析文本中兒童與成人不同視角的衝突,試圖從中闡明E. B. 懷特的社會同理與改變行動,並探究出影響《夏綠蒂的網》烏托邦元素的開放敘述,吸引讀者並傳達關於人類追求希望、美國精神探索。
In Charlotte’s Web (1952), E. B. White employs anthropomorphic language as a means of dialogue, and the depiction of America’s four seasons and the natural cycle of life as narrative structures. These elements construct a life detached from historical events, as the works do not mention World War II (1939-1945). This approach provides personal solace amid social turmoil and helps solidify the values and emotions associated with American family and farm life. This study primarily analyzes Charlotte’s Web to explore the interactions between animal and human characters in the alternative realities depicted by E. B. White. Utilizing a utopian framework, particularly drawing on Ruth Levitas’s theory of the imaginary reconstitution of society, I analyze children’s literature to explain why the inquiries and pursuits of child characters are not naive. This study explores the dynamic social care and conflicting dynamics between imagination and reality in utopian construction. In E. B. White’s children’s literature, readers can observe the power of imaginative storytelling and the significance of children’s innocent behaviors and emotions in plot development. The study analyzes the conflicts between children’s and adults’ perspectives in the texts, attempting to elucidate E. B. White’s social empathy and actions for change, and exploring the open narratives influencing the utopian elements in Charlotte’s Web, aiming to engage readers and convey messages about humanity’s pursuit of hope and exploration of the American spirit.
Bradford, Clare, et al. New World Orders in Contemporary Children’s Literature: Utopian Transformations. Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
Bachelard, Gaston. The Poetics of Space. Presses Universitaires de France, 1958.
Benjamin, Walter. “Theses on the Philosophy of History.” Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt, Oxford University Press, 1998.
Campbell, Joseph, with Bill Moyers. “Myth and the Modern World.” The Power of Myth, edited by Betty Sue Flowers, Anchor Books, 1991, pp. 1-43.
Dupuy, Jean-Pierre. The Mark of the Sacred. Trans. M. B. DeBevoise. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 2013.
Elledge, Scott. E.B. White: A Biography. New York: Norton, 1984.
Elick, Catherine L. Talking Animals in Children’s Fiction: A Critical Study. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 2015.
Erisman, Fred. “Emersonian Echoes in E. B. White’s Charlotte’s Web.” Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies (HJEAS), vol. 4, no. 1/2, 1998, pp. 277-283.
Fitting, Peter. “A Short History of Utopian Studies.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 36, no. 1, 2009, pp. 121-131.
Flaumenhaft, Mera J. “Charlotte’s Web for Grownups.” St. John’s Review, vol. 61, no. 1/2, 2019, pp. 1-33.
Gordin, Michael D., et al., editors. Utopia/Dystopia: Conditions of Historical Possibility. Princeton University Press, 2010.
Grattan, Sean Austin. “Introduction: Utopia/Affect.” Hope Isn’t Stupid: Utopian Affects in Contemporary American Literature, Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 2017, pp. 1-30.
Gherman, Beverly. E.B. White: Some Writer! New York: Beech Tree, 1994.
Gallagher, Matthew W., and Shane J. Lopez. “Introduction to the Science of Hope.” The Oxford Handbook of Hope. Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 3-7.
Levitas, Ruth. Utopia As Method: The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society. Palgrave MacMillan, 2013.
Neumeyer, Peter. “What Makes a Good Children’s Book? The Texture of Charlotte’s Web.” South Atlantic Bulletin, vol. 44, no. 2, 1979, pp. 66-75.
Ricoeur, Paul. Lectures on Ideology and Utopia. Columbia University Press, 1986.
Smith, Eric D. Globalization, Utopia and Postcolonial Science Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
Sims, Michael. The Story of Charlotte’s Web: E.B. White’s Eccentric Life in Nature and the Birth of an American Classic. New York: Walker, 2011.
Sweet, Melissa. Some Writer!: The Story of E.B. White. Boston:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2016.
Tally Jr., Robert T. Utopia in the Age of Globalization: Space, Representation, and the World System. Palgrave Pivot, 2013.
Thomas, Trudelle H. “The Arc of the Rope Swing: Humour, Poetry, and Spirituality in Charlotte’s Web by E. B. White.” International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, vol. 21, no. 3/4, 2016, pp. 201-215.
White, Elwyn Brooks. Charlotte’s Web. Harper & Brothers, 1952.
Warren, Calvin L. “Black Nihilism and the Politics of Hope.” CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 15, no. 1, 2015, pp. 215-248.
Zepke, Stephen. “Beyond cognitive estrangement: The future of science fiction cinema.” European Journal of Media Studies, published by Amsterdam University Press, NECSUS, vol. 1, no. 2, 2012.
張惠娟。《烏托邦的流變文類研究與文本考察》(Perspectives on Utopia: Generic Investigation and Textual Exploration),書林出版有限公司,2020。