本研究係以「民主滿意度」、「民主支持」兩項指標探討台灣民眾的民主
態度，以了解台灣民眾對於民主政治實際運作的感受。本研究的研究目的有三：
第一是探討不同背景變項民眾的民主滿意度、民主支持之差異。第二是建構並
驗證本研究建構的結構模式，歸納台灣民眾的國家經濟評價、執政評價對政治
信任感、民主滿意度、民主支持是否存在直接或間接的影響。第三則是探討本
研究建構的結構模式能否通過多群組分析層層的檢驗，分析各群組建構系統的
平均數有無顯著差異。本研究以文獻分析、驗證性因素分析、結構方程模式與
多群組分析做為主要之研究方法。並以「2012 年總統選舉面訪案」(TEDS2012P)
所調查的資料加以實徵。
　　首先，研究結果發現，在差異分析中，台灣民眾民主滿意度、民主支持兩
向度的之整體情況為中上程度，顯示整體而言，台灣民眾對民主政治是持肯定
的態度。經施以平均數和變異數的檢定，不同性別、社團參與、政治知識的台
灣民眾在民主滿意度、民主支持的平均數並無顯著差異。而不同教育程度、年
齡的台灣民眾在民主滿意度的平均數達到顯著差異，但在民主支持的平均數並
無顯著差異。
　　其次，經驗證性因素分析，本研究測量模式無論信度、效度、估計參數，
各觀察變項之標準化殘差常態分配檢定，均達可接受水準。進一步經結構方程
模式整體適配度檢定及競爭模式分析，本研究的修正模式，無論在模式基本適
配度、內在品質與整體適配度都非常理想，且為最佳的模式。研究結果顯示，
國家經濟評價、執政評價是影響民眾政治信任感的主要因素；國家經濟評價、
執政評價、政治信任感是影響民眾民主滿意度、民主支持的重要變項。符合理
性選擇理論、公民資質理論的觀點。此外，國家經濟評價透過政治信任感間接
影響民眾民主滿意度、民主支持，因此，「政治信任感」中介變項的角色被驗證
確實成立。
　　此外，本研究以性別、社團參與、政治知識等三個變項，對修正模式進行
群組分析，經驗證結果顯示，即使加入這三個干擾因素後該模式依然維持可接
受的適配度。本研究也發現，不同群組在五個潛在變項的平均數也無顯著差異，
不同群組的平均數可視為相等，顯示台灣民眾在國家經濟評價、執政評價、政
治信任感、民主滿意度、民主支持五個潛在變項的狀況是相似的，也顯示本修
正模式並不會因為性別、社團參與、政治知識的不同，而出現推論與適用性的
限制。

This study explored popular attitudes toward democracy by examining the people’s degree of satisfaction and support for democracy. The purpose of the study was to compare how satisfied people from different backgrounds were with democracy and to what degree they supported democracy. A structural equation model of the popular attitudes toward democracy in Taiwan was constructed and examined, and the relationships among the sociotropic evaluation of the economy, satisfaction with the current incumbent, political trust, satisfaction with democracy, and support for democracy of the Taiwanese people were determined. This structural equation model was verified by conducting a multiple-group analysis. The methods applied in this study were literature analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modeling, and multiple-group analysis, and was tested using survey data collected in Taiwan’s Election and Democratization Study Project of 2012 (TEDS 2012P). The main findings of this study were the following:
First, it was determined that the degree of people’s satisfaction and support for democracy was at a high-intermediate level. The degree of people’s satisfaction with democracy differed significantly depending on their age and education level.
Second, the item and construct reliabilities as well as the differentiated validity of the measurement systems were satisfactory for constructing the structural equation model. Regarding the goodness-of-fit indices of the measurement models and analysis with 4 competition patterns, the results indicated that this modified model fit well and was supported. The analysis results showed that the sociotropic evaluation of the economy and satisfaction with the current incumbent considerably and directly influenced political trust. It revealed that the people’s satisfaction with democracy and support for democracy were derived from the influence of the sociotropic evaluation of the economy, satisfaction with the current incumbent, and political trust. The analysis results corresponded to the explanations of rational choice theory and citizenship theory. Moreover, an analysis conducted using the modified model revealed that a sociotropic evaluation of the economy substantially and indirectly influenced people’s satisfaction and support for democracy through political trust. In other words, political trust played a mediational role in explaining popular attitudes toward democracy.
Finally, multigroup analyses of this modified model was also verified by considering the gender, association participation, and political knowledge of the participants, and it was proven that the fitness of this model was still acceptable and that the means of the 5 constructs were equal. These findings show that the model is acceptable for explaining the democratic attitudes of Taiwanese people.

中文書目
王中天（2010）。當社會信任遇見政治信任—對政治文化觀點的整合與檢驗。台灣民主季刊，7(4)，47-83。
王靖興、孫天龍（2005）。台灣民眾民主政治評價影響因素之分析。台灣民主季刊，2(3)，55-79。
王嘉州（2001）。經濟發展與政治民主化的量化分析。中國事務，6，58-79。
朱雲漢（2012）。民國一百零一年總統與立法委員選舉面訪案。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告。計畫編號：NSC100-2420-H002-030。
伍佩鈴（2004）。經濟評估、施政滿意度、政黨支持與選民投票抉擇之研究-2000年台北市長、高雄市長選舉個案分析。國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
李世宏、吳重禮（2003）。總統施政表現評價影響因素之分析與比較：以整體施政、經濟發展與兩岸關係為例。公共行政學報，8，35-69。
吳明隆（2009）。結構方程模式的操作與應用。台北：五南。
吳親恩（2007）。台灣民眾政治信任的差異：政治人物、政府與民主體制三個面向的觀察。台灣政治學刊，11(1)，147-200。
吳親恩（2009）。經濟議題與民主體制評價 —東亞國家的觀察。台灣民主季刊，6(1)，1-39。
邱千玶（2010）。階級差異與民主支持—台灣中產階級對民主的態度。臺灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
周祖誠（1999）。建構民意政府之研究。李連教育基金會第二屆新生代策論獎論文。台北：作者自行出版。
林恭安（2005）。臺灣人民對民主鞏固的認知研究－以2000年政黨輪替前後變化為例。國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
林嘉誠（1989）。政治心理形成與政治參與行為。台北：商務印書館。
林聰吉（2007a）。政治支持與民主鞏固。政治科學論叢，34，71-104。
林聰吉（2007b）。解析台灣的民主政治：以民主支持度與滿意度為觀察指標。選舉研究，14(1)， 61-84。
林聰吉（2007c）。台灣民眾政治知識的變遷與來源。東吳政治學報，25(3)，93-129。
林聰吉（2008）。台灣社會資本的分佈與民主效果。東吳政治學報，26(2)，39-81。
林聰吉（2013）。換了位置就換了腦袋嗎？－探索台灣總統大選的選舉輸家。台灣民主季刊，10(1)，1-34。
林瓊珠（2005）。台灣民眾的政治知識：1992-2000 年的變動。選舉研究，12(1)，147-171。
林瓊珠（2008）。議題、候選人評價、黨派意識－2006 年台北市長選舉投票行爲研究。台灣民主季刊，56(2)，59-87。
林瓊珠、蔡佳泓（2010）。政黨信任、機構信任與民主滿意度。政治與社會哲學評論，35，147-194。
洪泉湖（1998）。從政治學論公民教育的理論與實施。載於張秀雄（主編），公民教育的理論與實施。台北：師大書苑。
徐火炎（1992）。民主轉型過程中政黨的重組：台灣地區民眾的民主價值取向、正偏好與黨派投票改變之研究。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學集刊，５(1)，213-263。
涂志堅、劉念夏（2001）。陳水扁總統就職週年施政滿意度之評估。國家政策論壇，1(3)，1-16。
許文傑（2000）。公民參與公共行政之理論與實踐－「公民性政府」的理想型建構。國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文，未出版，台北市。
郭承天、吳煥偉（1997）。民主與經濟發展：結合質與量的研究方法，問題與研究，36(9)，75-98。
郭秋永（2009）。公民意識：實證與規範之間的一個整合研究。見張福建（主編） ,公民與政治行動：實護與規範之間的對話，41-94 。台北：:中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心。
張四明（2000）。民意調查的科學基礎、政治功能與限制：以我國政府首長施政滿意度調查為例。行政暨政策學報，2，1-40。
張佑宗（2009）。選舉輸家與民主鞏固—台灣2004年總統選舉落選陣營對民主的態度。台灣民主季刊，6(1)，41-72。
張佑宗（2011）。選舉結果、政治學習與民主支持—兩次政黨輪替後台灣公民在民主態度與價值的變遷。台灣民主季刊，8(2)，99-137。
張秀雄、李琪明（2000）。理想公民資質之探究─台灣地區的個案。新世紀價值教育、公民教育國際學術研討會論文。香港：香港中文大學。
梁淑芬（2007）。政治信任的來源與民主效果：以機構信任為分析焦點。淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士班碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
盛治仁（2003）。臺灣民眾民主價值及政治信任感研究：政黨輪替前後的比較。選舉研究，10(1)，115-69。
盛治仁、白瑋華(2008)。陳水扁總統首任施政評價影響因素探討。東吳政治學報，26(1)，1-50。
陳心怡（2001）。自由民主與經濟發展的關係：新見解。社會理論學報，4(2)，333-372。
陳文俊（1983）。台灣地區中學生的政治態度極其形成原因─青少年的政治社會化。台北：資訊推廣基金會。
陳文俊（1998）。台灣地區學生的政治文化：中、大學生的政治態度與台灣民主化前景。國立中山大學社會科學季刊，1(3)，23-60。
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵（2005）。多變量分析方法－統計軟體應用（四版）。台北：五南。
陳陸輝（2000）。台灣選民政黨認同的持續與變遷。選舉研究，7(2)，39-52。
陳陸輝（2002）。政治信任感與台灣選民投票行為。選舉研究，9(2)，65-84。
陳陸輝（2003）。政治信任、施政表現與民眾對台灣民主的展望。台灣政治學刊， 7(2)，149-188。
陳陸輝（2007）。台灣民眾政治支持的初探。2007年台灣政治學會年會暨學術研討會論文。台北：台灣政治學會，11月17-18日。
陳陸輝、周應龍（2008）。政治信任的持續與變遷。台灣的社會變遷1985～2005：台灣社會變遷調查計畫第十一次研討會第二階段論文。台北：中央研究院人文社會科學館，3月28-29日。
陳陸輝、陳義彥（2002）。政治功效意識、政治信任感以及台灣選民的民主價值。2001年選舉與民主化調查研究學術研討會論文。台北：國立政治大學選舉研究中心，10月19-20日。
陳順宇（2007）。多變量分析。台北：華泰。
黃芳銘，楊金寶，許福生（2005）。在學青少年生活痛苦指標發展之研究。師大學報，50(2)，97-119。
黃芳銘（2006）。結構方程模式：理論與應用。台北：五南。
黃秀端（1994）。經濟情況與選民投票抉擇。東吳政治學報，3，97-123。
黃信豪（2012）。民主態度的類型：台灣民眾二次政黨輪替後的分析。選舉研究，18(1)，1-34。
黃雅婷（2013）。相對所得對民主態度之影響關係。國立台北大學財政學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
黃慕也、張世賢（2008）。政治媒介藉由政治效能、政治信任對投票行為影響分析—以2005年選舉為例。台灣民主季刊，5(1)，45-85。
曾永清（2013）。大學生理財素養及其相關因素徑路關係之檢驗。高等教育，8(1)，1-29。
游清鑫（1997）。共識與爭議—一些民主化研究問題的探討。問題與研究，36(9)，59-73。
游清鑫、蕭怡靖（2007）。以新選民的政治態度論台灣民主政治的未來。台灣民主季刊，4(3)，109-151。
馮玉騏（2008）。台灣民眾政治信任感的來源及其政治後果。淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士班碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
趙永茂（1995）。臺灣地方菁英的民主價值取向。政治科學論叢，6，73-108。
趙永茂（2002）。台灣地方菁英的民主價值取向—一九九三年與二○○一年調查結果之比較分析。政治科學論叢，17，57-80。
蔡佳泓（2000）。美國政治事件及國內經濟之選舉效應：1920-1996美國總統選舉研究。歐美研究，30(3)，143-191。
蔡佳泓（2009）。台灣民眾的民主評價：以2004 年為例的驗證性因素分析。社會科學論叢，3(1)，151-184。
蔡佳泓、黃冠達（2005）。民主評價與民主滿意度之一致性：以台灣為例。2005年臺灣政治學會年會暨學術研討會論文。臺北：中央研究院，10月1-2日。
蔡昌言（2011）。民主鞏固因素之影響性分析－臺灣與其他東亞民主國家的比較。問題與研究，50(4)，1-30。
劉嘉薇（2008）。大眾傳播媒介對大學生政治支持的影響：一項定群追蹤的研究。國立政治大學政治研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
賴世培等（1996）。民意調查。台北：空大。
蕭佳賓（2011）。深度休閒者知識獲取行為模式之研究。台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系博士論文，未出版，台北市。
藍育賢（2011）。台灣選民政黨投票行為之研究──以2008年立法委員選舉為例。中華大學行政管理學系碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
謝政諭（1996）。體驗有益的大學社團活動—已達認識與充實生涯規劃。訓育研究，35(3)，29-32。
鐘敏玲、蔡奇霖（2005）。臺灣民眾民主滿意度之研究。台灣選舉與民主化調查（2004總統大選）國際學術研討會論文。台北：東吳大學。

英文書目
Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Anderson, Christopher J., and Christine A. Guillory. (1997). "Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and
Majoritarian Systems," American Political Science Review, vol. 91, no.1(March), pp. 66~81.
Beetham, David. (1999). Democracy and Human Rights (Cambridge: Policy Press).
Bratton, Michael and Robert Mattes (2001). Support for Democracy in Africa:Intrisic or Instrumental? British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 31, No.3,pp.447~474.
Bratton, Michael, Robert Mattes, and E. Gyimah-Boadi (2005). Public Opinion,Democracy and Market Reform in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brody, Richard A.( 1991). Assessing the President: the Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford, CA: Prentice Hall.
Brown, C.M. (1997). Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of The American Society For Information Science, 50(10), 929–943.
Canache, Damarys, Jeffery J. Mondak, and Mitchell A. Seligson. (2001). “Meaning and Measurement in Cross-National Research on Satisfaction with Democracy.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65(4): 506-528.
Cantril, H. & G. W. Allport (1935). The Psychology of Radio. New York: Harper.
Chang, Yu-tzung, and Yun-han Chu. (2008). “How Citizens View Taiwan’s New Democracy.” In How East Asians View Democracy, eds. Yun-han Chu, Larry Diamond, Andrew J. Nathan, and Doh-chull Shin. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chanley, Virginia A. (2002). Trust in Government in the Aftermath of 9/11:Determinants and Consequences. Political Psychology 23(3): 469-483.
Chu, Yun-han, Larry Diamond, and Doh Chull Shin. (2001). Halting Progress in Korea and Taiwan. Journal of Democracy 12:122-136
Chu, Yun-han, Michael Bratton, Marta Lagos, Sandeep Shastri, and Mark Tessler.(2008). Public Opinion and Democratic Legitimacy. Journal of Democracy 19(2): 74-87.
Citrin，J. (1974). Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Governm ent.The American Political Science Review, 68(3):973-988.
Citrin, Jack, and Christopher Muste (1999). Trust in Government. In Robinson,John P., Philip R. Shaver, and Lawrence S. Wrightsman. (eds.) Measures of Political Attitudes. San Diego, Cal.: Academic Press. pp.:465-532.
Clarke, Harold D., Nitish Dutt, and Allan Kornberg (1993).The Political Economy of Attitudes toward Polity and Society in Western European Democracies. Journal of Politics, Vol. 55, No. 4:998-1021.
Dahl, Robert A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition (New Haven,Connecticut: Yale University Press).
Dalton, Russell J. (1994).Communists and Democratic Attitudes in the two Generations. British Journal of Political Science 24(4): 469-493.
Dalton, Russell J. (1999).. Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed. Pippa Norris. New York: Oxford University Press.
David Potter、David Goldbalt、Margaret Klloh、Paul Lewis (1997) Democratization.王謙、李昌麟、林賢治、黃惟饒譯（2003）。《最新民主化的歷程》。臺北：韋伯文化，頁271~297。
David Jary、Julia Jary(1992). The Harper Collins Dictionary of Sociology.周業謙、周光淦譯（2005）。《社會學辭典》。臺北：貓頭鷹出版社。
Diamond, L. (1992). Economic Development and Democracy Reconsidered,American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 35, pp. 450~499.
Diamond, L. (1994).Political Culture and Developing Countries.Boulder, CO:Lynne Rienner.
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Toward onsolidation. Baltimore,MD/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Scott Keeter. (1996). What Americans Know about Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Easton, David. ( 1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley Press.
Easton, David.( 1957). "An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems," World Politics, vol. 9, no. 3 (April), pp.383~400.
Ely, John Hart (1980)., Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review,Harvard University Press．
MacKuen, Michael B. (1983). Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential Popularity. American Journal of Political Science 27: 165-192.
Evans, Geoffrey and Stephen Whitefield. (1995). The Polities and Economics of Democratic Commitment: Support for Democracy in Transition Society British.Journal of Political Science 25(4):485-514.
Feldman, Stanley (1983). The Measurement and Meaning of Political Trust. Political Methodology, Vol. 9, No. 3:341-54.
Fiorina, Morris P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American Elections. New Haven:Yale University Press.
Fishbein, M. (1967). Attitude and the prediction of behavior. In M. Fishbein (Eds.),Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: Wiley.
Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp.39-50.
Galston, William (1991). Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gamson, William A. (1968). Power and Discontent .Homewood, Illinois: The Dorsey Press.
Golden, David G. and James M. Poterba. (1980).The Price of Popularity: The Political Business Cycle Reexamined. American Journal of Political Science 34: 696-714.
Gutmann, Amy & Dennis Thompson (1996). Democracy and Disagreement.Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Hardin, Russell (2006). Trust. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Hess, R. D., & Torney, J. V. (1970). The development of political attitudes in American, In E. S. Greenberg Cod. Political Socialization, 4, 64-84, New York:Altherton Press.
Hetherington, R. (1998).The Political Relevance of Political Trust. American Political Science Review 92(4): 791-808.
Hetherington, R. (2005). Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Hibbs, Douglas A. (1977). Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 71, No. 4:1467-87.
Huntington, S. (1968). Political Order in Changing Society. 江炳倫等譯（1981）。《轉變中社會的政治秩序程》。臺北：黎明。
Holbrook, Thomas and James C. Garand. (1996). Home Economus? Economic Information and Economic Voting. Political Research Quarterly 49,2:351-375.
Inglehart, Ronald F. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural,Economic, and Political Changes in 43 Societies. Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald and Christian Welzel(2005).Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Inkeles, Alex and David Smith (1974). Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Developing Countries.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
Jennings, M. Kent (1998). Gender and Political participation in the Chinese Countryside. Journal of Politics, Vol. 60, No. 4:954-73.
Kenski, Henry C. (1977). The Impact of Economic Conditions on Presidential Popularity. The Journal of Politics 23: 705-731.
Kernell, Samuel. (1986). Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Kim，J.Y. (2005). "Bowling together" isn't a cure-all: The Relationship between Social Capital and Political Trust in South Korea.International Political Science Review，26(2):193-213.
Kitschelt, Herber(1992). The Formation of Party Systems in East Central Europe, Politics and Society, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 7~50.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. (1999). Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed.Pippa Norris. New York: 31 Oxford University Press.
Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control. (9th ed.). New Jesery: Prentice Hall.
Kornberg, Allan and Harold D. Clarke. (1994).Beliefs about Democracy and Satisfaction with Democratic Government: The Canadian Case, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 3 (June), pp.537~563.
Lagos, Marta.(2001). Between Stability and Crisis in Latin America. Journal of Democracy 12(1):137-145
Lewis-Beck, Michael (1988). Economic and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Martin Paldam (2000). Economic Voting: An Introduction. Electoral Studies, Vol. 19, No. 2:113-21.
Linde, Jonas, and Joakim Ekman (2003). Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 42, No. 3:391-408.
Linz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Linz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lipset, S. M. (1959), Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy, The American Political Science Review, 53(1), pp.69-105.
Listhaug, Ola. (1995). The Dynamics of Trust in politicians. In Citizens and the State, eds. Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Little, T. D. (1997).Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analysis of cross-cultural Data: Practice and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53-76.
McAllister, Ian (1999). The Economic Performance of Governments. In Pippa Neustadt, Richard E. (1990). Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Regan. New York: Free Press.
Merkl, Peter H. (1988). Comparing Legitimacy and Values among Advanced Democratic Countries. In Mattei Dogan (ed.), Comparing Pluralist Democracies: Strains in Legitimacy (pp. 19-64). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Miller, Arthur H., and Ola Listhaug.( 1999). Political Performance and Institutional Trust. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed. Pippa Norris. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mishler, William,Richard Rose.(2005).What Are The Political Consequences of Trust? A Test of Cultural and Institutional Theories in Russia.Comparative Political Studies,38(9),1050-1078.
Miller, Arthur. (1974).Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review 68 (3):951-972.
Monroe, Kristen R. (1978). Economic Influences on Presidential Popularity. Public Opinion Quarterly 42: 360-69.
Natalia Melgar, Maximo Rossi, and Tom W. Smith. (2010). The Perception of Corruption. Journal of Public Opinion Research. 22(1):120-131.
Norpoth, Helmut. (1984). Economics, Politics, and the Cycle of Presidential Popularity. Political Behavior 6: 253-271.
Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance (pp.188-203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Olson, Mancur. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Ostrom, Charles W. Jr. and Dennis M. Simon. (1985). Promise and Performance: A Dynamics Model of Presidential Popularity. American Political Science Review 79: 334-358.
Przeworski, Adam, Michael M. Alvarez, Jose A. Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi.(1996). What Makes Democracies Endure? Journal of Democracy 7(1): 39-55.
Przeworski, Adam. (1991). Democracy and The Market: political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Psychology, 4(3):295-306.
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ranney, A. (2001). Governing: an introduction to political science. New York: HRW.
Sartori, Giovanni (1987). Democratic Theory Revisited (Chatham: Chatham House Publishers).
Schmitt, Hermann (1983). Party Government in Public Opinion: A European Cross-National Comparison. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 11, No.4:353-76.
Scholz, John T., and Mark Lubell (1998). Trust and Taxpaying: Testing the Heuristic Approach to Collective Action. American Journal of Political Science 42(2): 398-417.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1950). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (New York,New York: Harper).
Seymour Martin Lipset (1981).Political man. The John Hopkins University Press.張明貴譯（1994）。《政治人》，台北：桂冠出版社。
Skorownek, Stephen. (1998).The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
Sorensen, Georg (1998). Democracy and Democratization: Processes and Prospects in a Changing World(Oxford: Westview Press), pp. 40~46.
Stolle, Dietlind and Thomas R. Rochon. (1998). Are All Associations Alike? Member Diversity, Associational Type, and the Creation of Social Capital.American Behavioral Scientist 42, 1: 47-65.
Sztompka, Piotr (1999). Trust: A Sociological theory.Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Tilly, Charles.(2005). Trust and Rule. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Tocqueville, Alexis De. (1966). Democracy in America (New York, New York:Harper).
Tsai,Chia-hung (2000). American Voter Responses to International Political Events and Economic Conditions: 1920-1996，《歐美研究》，第30卷，第3期，頁143-191。
Wagner, Alexander F., Friedrich Schneider, and Martin Halla (2009). The Quality of Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy in Western Europe-A Panel Analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 25, No. 1: 30-41.
Waldron-Morre, Pamela (1999). Eastern Europe at the Crossroads of Democratic Transition: Evaluating Support for Democratic Institutions, Satisfaction with Democratic Government, and Consolidation of Democratic Regimes, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 32~62.
Wang, T. Y. (2008). Democratic Commitment in Taiwan: An Analysis of Survey Data. In Democratization in Taiwan: Challenges in Transformation, eds. Philip Paolino and James Meernik. Vermont: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Warren, Mark E.(1999a). Democratic Theory and Trust. In Democracy and Trust, ed. Mark Warren. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Warren, Mark E.(1999b). Introduction. In Democracy and Trust, ed. Mark Warren. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Warren, Mark E.(1999c) Conclusion, in Mark E. Warren ed., Democracy and Trust.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346-360.
Wells, W. D., & Prensky, D. (1996). Consumer behavior. New York: Wiley.
William, John T. (1985). Systematic Influence on Political Trust: The Importance on Perceived Institutional Performance, Political Methodology, vol. 11, no. 12, pp.
125~142.
Williams, John T. (1985). Systemic Influence on Political Trust: The Importance on Perceived Institutional Performance. Political Methodology, Vol. 11, No.1-2:125-42.