簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蕭如文
Hsiao, Ju-Wen
論文名稱: 擺盪於自由民主與非自由民主之間:菲律賓政治變遷之研究(1972-2020)
Wavering between Liberal Democracy and Illiberal Democracy: A Case Study of the Political Change in the Philippines from 1972 to 2020
指導教授: 陳文政
Chen, Wen-Cheng
口試委員: 孫國祥 陳嘉銘
Chen, Chia-Ming
陳文政
Chen, Wen-Cheng
口試日期: 2022/01/07
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 東亞學系
Department of East Asian Studies
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 218
中文關鍵詞: 自由民主非自由民主民粹式民主菲律賓政治變遷
英文關鍵詞: liberal democracy, illiberal democracy, populist democracy, political change in the Philippines
研究方法: 次級資料分析歷史研究法比較研究
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200055
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:152下載:43
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文旨在探析菲律賓的自由民主與非自由民主之政體變遷,根據自由之家資料作為基礎,並以V-Dem智庫與非自由民主指標檢視歷屆政府,透過歷史研究途徑、文獻分析及比較與歷史研究法,以此觀察菲國政體自1972年迄今之變動,探究自由民主與非自由民主之關係。
    菲律賓的非自由民主與自由民主關係微妙,後馬可仕時期政府長期擺動於兩種政體之中,其中,本文不僅檢視兩次人民力量革命對菲國自由民主之影響性,亦觀察歷屆政府表現,以探究政府與自由度變動之相關性。研究結果顯示:菲國的政體變動軌跡並無一致性,即便是面臨人民最重要之三大核心問題—失業、貧窮、犯罪—政府回應之處理能力並未和自由度變化有相關性;人民滿意度亦未與自由度和政府處理問題之能力具有相關性。值得注意的是,菲國後馬可仕時期之政體逐漸朝向非自由主義式民主政體靠攏,艾奎諾三世與杜特蒂政府皆維持在部分自由國家,他們並未促進自由度,然他們處理失業、貧窮、犯罪等問題卻明顯較有成效,並獲得人民的高度肯定,故其正當性高。

    The study investigated the evolution of the relevance between liberal democracy and illiberal democracy in the Philippines from 1972 to 2020. This thesis is based on the data of Freedom House, V-Dem, and illiberal indicators and tries to explore the evolution of the Philippines’ political regimes.
    The Philippines’ political regimes have been wavering between liberal democracy and illiberal democracy for a long period, while especially EDSA Revolution I and EDSA Revolution II strongly influenced the way toward liberal democracy in the post-Marcos period. This thesis examined the impact of the EDSA Revolution, it also explores the relations between governments’ performance and freedom development. Based on the research results, the change of political regime in the Philippines had no consistency. The relationships among unemployment, poverty, crimes, freedom, and people’s satisfaction are nonrelevance. Overall, despite the recent Philippines’ political regimes have become more illiberal, the skills that different government responds the unemployment, poverty, and crimes become robust, and they contribute to higher popular satisfaction and higher regime legitimacy.

    目錄 iv 表目錄 vii 圖目錄 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與研究目的 1 壹、 研究動機 1 貳、 研究目的 6 第二節 研究途徑與研究方法 8 壹、 研究途徑 8 貳、 研究方法 9 第三節 文獻回顧與名詞釋義 12 壹、 文獻回顧 12 貳、 名詞釋義 34 第四節 研究架構與研究限制 37 壹、 研究架構 37 貳、 研究限制 40 第二章 政治體制類型與評估方式之分析 41 第一節 政治體制類型化的分析 41 壹、 政體類型的學術研究之傳統分類 41 貳、 政體類型的學術研究之當代觀點 44 第二節 自由民主政體評估方式之分析 48 壹、 美國自由之家的評估模式 48 貳、 美國Polity IV的評估模式 49 參、 瑞典V-Dem計畫的評估模式 50 肆、 瑞典全球民主指標的評估模式 51 伍、 英國經濟學人的評估模式 51 陸、 德國BTI的評估模式 52 柒、 本節綜合分析 53 第三節 非自由民主體制指標之分析 55 壹、 英國PopuList評估模式 55 貳、 瑞典Timbro Authoritarian Populism Index評估模式 55 參、 問卷調查評估人民的民粹主義態度 56 肆、 檢測政治人物的民粹主義態度 57 伍、 本節綜合分析 58 第四節 本論文採用之體制評估 60 壹、 本文採納的自由民主政體分析方法 60 貳、 本文採納的非自由民主指標 62 第三章 菲律賓邁向自由民主的歷程 65 第一節 非自由民主的馬可仕政府 65 壹、 獨裁治理與逐步放寬自由民主空間 65 貳、 政府處理核心問題之能力 73 參、 綜合評價 75 第二節 1986年人民力量革命 76 壹、 第一次人民力量革命之背景 76 貳、 第一次人民力量革命之意涵 79 第三節 擺盪於自由與部分自由之間:柯拉蓉政府 81 壹、 重建自由民主與其挫折 81 貳、 政府處理核心問題之能力 85 參、 人民滿意度 86 第四節 自由民主政體:艾斯特拉達政府 89 壹、 短暫的自由民主政體 89 貳、 政府處理核心問題之能力 92 參、 人民滿意度 93 第四章 擺動於自由民主與非自由民主之間 97 第一節 提升自由民主品質:羅慕斯政府 97 壹、 促進自由主義式民主 97 貳、 政府處理核心問題之能力 101 參、 人民滿意度 103 第二節 2001年第二次人民力量革命 105 壹、 第二次人民力量革命之背景 105 貳、 第二次人民力量革命之意涵 107 第三節 壓縮自由民主品質:艾洛雅政府 110 壹、 自由主義式民主式微 110 貳、 政府處理核心問題之能力 116 參、 人民滿意度 118 第五章 向非自由民主政體的遞變 121 第一節 持平的部分自由政體:艾奎諾三世政府 121 壹、 持平的非自由民主 121 貳、 政府處理核心問題之能力 125 參、 人民滿意度 127 第二節 自由度下降之非自由民主政體:杜特蒂政府 129 壹、 非自由主義式民主價值的轉變 129 貳、 政府處理核心問題之能力 135 參、 人民滿意度 138 第六章 菲律賓政治體制變動之總體分析 141 第一節 政體變動下的自由品質 141 壹、 羅慕斯主政期間:從非自由主義式民主走向自由民主 141 貳、 柯拉蓉與艾洛雅主政:從自由民主轉向非自由民主 146 第二節 政體不變下的自由品質 158 壹、 馬可仕主政期間:自由品質提高 158 貳、 杜特蒂主政期間:自由品質降低 164 第三節 持平的政體與自由品質 169 壹、 艾斯特拉達主政期間:維持自由主義式民主 169 貳、 艾奎諾三世主政期間:維持非自由主義式民主 173 第四節 總體分析 178 壹、 菲律賓政體變動路徑 178 貳、 菲律賓民主現況 183 第七章 結論 187 第一節 研究發現 187 壹、 菲國政體轉變的軌跡與政府處理能力之相關性 187 貳、 自由度異動軌跡與政府處理能力之相關性 190 參、 人民滿意度與自由度發展、政府績效之相關性 192 肆、 反思自由民主政府與民粹民主政府的正當性 192 第二節 後續研究建議 194 壹、 2022年總統選舉後續發展 194 貳、 研究蒐集方法建議 194 參考文獻 196 一、 中文文獻 196 二、 英文文獻 199 三、 網路資料 210

    一、 中文文獻
    Da Empoli, G.著、林佑軒譯(2019),《政客、權謀、小丑:民粹如何襲捲全球》,臺北:時報出版。
    Earl, B. 著、林秀雲譯(2016),《社會科學研究方法》,臺北:雙葉書廊。
    Heywood, A. 著、楊日青、李培元、林文斌、劉兆隆譯(2002),《政治學新論》,新北市:韋伯文化。
    Judis, J. B. 著、李隆生、張逸安譯(2017),《民粹大爆炸:公民不服從,群眾上街頭,美歐政局風雲變色的反思與警示》,臺北:聯經。
    Steward, D. R. 著、董旭英、黃儀娟譯(2000),《次級資料研究法》,臺北:弘智文化。
    Trachtenberg, M. 著、陳秉逵譯(2010),《歷史研究取徑與方法:以外交史為例》,臺北:韋伯文化。
    Wilkin, S. 著、孔思文譯(2019),《民粹與政權的覆亡:如何擺脫重蹈覆轍的歷史》,臺北:遠流。
    水島治郎、林詠純譯(2018),《民粹時代:是邪惡的存在,還是改革的希望》,臺北:先覺。
    王海山(2003),《科學方法百科辭典》,臺北:恩楷。
    王鴻維(2016),《民粹主義對所得的影響:亞洲四小龍比較》,國立中央大學經濟學系碩士論文(未出版)。
    江俊霆(1999),《菲律賓柯拉蓉政權崛起之研究(1983-1986)--民粹主義觀點的個案分析》,國立臺灣大學政治學碩士論文(未出版)。
    余明興(2017),《菲律賓與台灣國會選舉制度之比較》,淡江大學亞洲研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    李冠和(2013),〈競爭式威權政體:選舉競爭度、穩定性、民主化〉,《政治科學論叢》,57,69-114。
    李新廷(2011),〈憲政民主的悖論連接? -兼及憲政自由民主與非自由民主的分野〉,《樂山師範學院學報》,26(7),63-70。
    林火旺(2005),〈審議民主與公民養成〉,《臺大哲學論評》,29,99-143。
    胡正光、江素慧(2020),〈民粹主義在台灣─ 韓國瑜及其支持者〉,《台灣國際研究季刊》,16(3),155-183。
    陌上桑、邱國禎(1986),《馬可仕的獨裁愛死症》,台北市:敦理出版社。
    孫本初(2005年6月8日),如何撰寫一篇優質的碩博士論文?,「撰寫碩博士論文與投稿學術期刊」論壇,臺北市,台灣。
    翁俊桔(2018),〈菲律賓的不流血獨立運動-與善霸共舞的典範〉,《台灣國際研究暨刊》,14(1),63-89。
    翁俊桔、呂炳寬(2018),〈從櫥窗到花車:菲律賓政黨體系轉變之剖析〉,《東吳政治學報》,36(1),179-228。
    高燕、王毅杰(2002),《社會科學研究方法》,中國:中國物價出版。
    張一彬(2016),〈學習將民主當作一種生活方式〉,《台灣人權學》,3(3),107-112。
    張佑宗(2009),〈搜尋台灣民粹式民主的群眾基礎〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,75,85-113。
    張明貴(2002),《政治學:政府與政治》,臺北:五南。
    莊詠勝(2019),《歐洲右翼政黨崛起之研究-以法國、英國與德國為例》,國立中興大學政治學碩士論文論文(未出版) 。
    陳文政(2019年6月21日),東亞民主的虛像與實像:政治體制偏好的初步分析,多元文明與跨域對話:區域研究的新視野國際學術研討會,臺北市,台灣。
    陳文政、莊旻達(2019),〈當代自由民主的侷限:理論與制度層次之初步考察〉,《哲學與文化》,46(2),5-32。
    陳鴻瑜(2016),《菲律賓史:東西文明交會的島國(三版)》,台灣:三民書局。
    黃小庭(2017),《近代西方帝國主義與東南亞殖民地經濟發展:以美國在菲律賓之治理為例(1898-1942)》,國立臺灣師範大學歷史學系碩士論文(未出版)。
    黃弘毅(2011),《台灣民粹主義的來源與內涵:從亞洲民主動態調查2010年台灣區計畫》,國立臺灣大學綜合社會及行為科學學類碩士論文(未出版)。
    黃明濤(2017),〈美式民主制度在菲律賓:歷程、特徵與展望〉,《印度洋經濟體研究》,1,71-87。
    黃昱珽(2014),《走出台灣民主的「悖論」:民族主義與民粹主義的挑戰》,東海大學社會學系博士論文(未出版)。
    黃哲真(2017),《菲律賓概觀》,台灣:福琳工商發展基金會與中華兩岸經貿投資文化教育協會。
    劉維宇(2017),《威權與民粹關係之遞嬗:柬埔寨政治變遷之研究(1970-2017)》,國立臺灣師範大學政治學碩士論文(未出版)。
    蔡相廷(2010),〈歷史制度主義的興起與研究取向 -政治學研究途徑的探討〉,《台北市立教育大學學報》,41(2),39-76。
    謝寶煖(1999),〈歷史研究法及其在圖書館資訊學之應用〉,《中國圖書館學會會報》,62,35-55。
    瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞(2015),《社會及行為科學研究法:質性研究法》,臺北:東華書局。
    顏永銘(2016),〈新人新政:杜特蒂總統與菲律賓的內外展望〉,《戰略安全研析》,134,29-38。
    羅天人(2014),《公民政治參與觀點論臺灣民主鞏固》,臺中:華格納。

    二、 英文文獻
    Abinales, P. N. (2010). The Philippines in 2009: The Blustery Days of August. Asian Survey, 50(1), 218-227.
    Abinales, P. N. (2011). The Philippines in 2010: Blood, Ballots, and Beyond. Asian Survey, 51(1), 163-172.
    Akkerman, A., C. Mudde & A. Zaslove (2013). How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47 (9), 1324-1353.
    Alvarez, M., J. A. Cheibub, F. Limongi & A. Przeworski (1996). Classifying political regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 31(2), 3-36.
    Arugay, A. A. & D. Slater (2019). Polarization Without Poles: Machiavellian Conflicts and the Philippines’ Lost Decade of Democracy, 2000–2010. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 122-136.
    Arugay, A. A. (2004). Mobilizing for Accountability: Contentious Politics in the Anti-Estrada Campaign. Philippine Sociological Review, 52, 75-96.
    Atienza, M. E. L. (2019). The Philippines in 2018: Broken Promises, Growing Impatience. Asian Survey, 59(1), 185-192.
    Atienza, M. E. L. (2020). The Philippines in 2019: Consolidation of Power, Unraveling of the Reform Agenda. Asian Survey, 60(1), 132-139.
    Bang, H. & D. Marsh (2018). Populism: A Major Threat to Democracy?. Policy Studies, 39(3), 352-363.
    Berja, C. L., M. P. P. Reyes & J. H. B. Baquiran (2014). Democratization Halfway through the Term of Another President Aquino: The 2013 ADI Survey in the Philippines. Asian Democracy Review, 3, 127-149.
    Bogaards, M. (2009). How to Classify Hybrid Regimes? Defective Democracy and Electoral Authoritarianism. Democratization, 16(2), 399-423.
    Bolongaita, E. P. (2000). The Philippines in 1999: Balancing Restive Democracy and Recovering Economy. Asian Survey, 40(1), 67-77.
    Brillantes, A. B. (1992). The Philippines in 1991: Disasters and Decisions. Asian Survey, 32(2), 140-145.
    Brillantes, A. B. (1993). The Philippines in 1992: Ready for Take Off?. Asian Survey, 33(2), 224-230.
    Casiple, R. C. (2016). The Duterte Presidency as a Phenomenon. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 38(2), 179-184.
    Cheibub, J. A., J. Gandhi & J. R. Vreeland (2010). Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited. Public Choice, 143(1), 67-101.
    Chu, Y. H, K. P. Huang, M. Lagos & R. Mattes (2020). A Lost Decade for Third-Wave Democracies?. Journal of Democracy, 31(2), 166-181.
    Coronel, S. S. (2007). The Philippines in 2006: Democracy and Its Discontents. Asian Survey, 47(1), 175-182.
    Curato, N. (2017). Flirting with Authoritarian Fantasies? Rodrigo Duterte and the New Terms of Philippine Populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(1), 142-153.
    Curato, N. (2019). Toxic Democracy? The Philippines in 2018. In Southeast Asian Affairs 2019 (pp. 261-274). ISEAS Publishing.
    De Castro, R. C. (2012). The Philippines in 2011: Muddling through a Year of Learning and Adjustment. Asian Survey, 52(1), 210-219.
    De Castro, R. C. (2013). The Philippines in 2012: ‘‘Easygoing, Do-Nothing’’ President Delivers. Asian Survey, 53(1), 109-116.
    Diamond, L. (2016). In Search of Democracy. New York: Routledge.
    Diamond, L. (2020). Break Out of the Democratic Slump. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 36-50.
    Dressel, B. (2011). The Philippines: How Much Real Democracy?. International Political Science Review, 32(5), 529-545.
    Foa, R. S. & Y. Mounk (2017). The Signs of Deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 4-14.
    Fukuyama, F. (2015). Why is Democracy Performing So Poorly?. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 11-20.
    Fukuyama, F. (2020). 30 Years of World Politics: What Has Changed?. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 11-21.
    Galston, W. A. (2018). The Populist Challenge to Liberal Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 29(2), 5-19.
    Galston, W. A. (2020). The Enduring Vulnerability of Liberal Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 31(3), 8-24.
    Ganguly, S. (2019). India Under Modi: Threats to Pluralism, Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 83-90.
    Ganguly, S. (2020). An Illiberal India?. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 193-202.
    Green, E. C. & W. Gallery (2016). Measuring Democracy. In Diamond, L.(Eds), In Search of Democracy (pp. 46-75). Routeldge.
    Grossholtz, J. (1974). Philippines 1973: Whither Marcos?. Asian Survey, 14(1), 101-112.
    Hedman, E. L. E. (2006). The Philippines in 2005: Old Dynamics, New Conjuncture. Asian Survey, 46(1), 187-193.
    Hernandez, C. G. (1988). The Philippines in 1987: Challenges of Redemocratization. Asian Survey, 28(2), 229-241.
    Hernandez, C. G. (1989). The Philippines in 1988: Reaching out to Peace and Economic Recovery. Asian Survey, 29(2), 154-164.
    Hernandez, C. G. (1996). The Philippines in 1995: Growth Amid Challenges. Asian Survey, 36(2), 142-151.
    Hernandez, C. G. (1997). The Philippines in 1996: A House Finally in Order?. Asian Survey, 37(2), 204-211.
    Hernandez, C. G. (2016). The Philippines in 2015: A House Still Not in Order?. 56(1), 115-122.
    Hernandez, C. G. (2017). The Philippines in 2016: The Year That Shook the World. Asian Survey, 57(1), 135-141.
    Hicken, A. (2008). The Philippines in 2007: Ballots, Budgets, and Bribes, Asian Survey, 48(1), 75-81.
    Hicken, A. (2009). The Philippines in 2008: Peace-building, War-fighting, and Crisis Management. Asian Survey, 49(1), 193-199.
    Hutchcroft, P. D. & J. Rocamora (2003). Strong Demands and Weak Institutions: The Origins and Evolution of the Democratic Deficit in the Philippines. Journal of East Asian Studies, 3(2), 259-292.
    James, H. (2010, September 29- October 1). The Legacy of Corazon Aquino: Aspirations for a more Robust Democratic Polity. In Proceedings of the 10th Women in Asia Conference, Canberra, Australia.
    Jison, J. R. (2018). Mobilizing EDSA People Power II in the Philippines: Lessons from the political process theory. Social Affairs, 1(9), 42-52.
    Kapidžić, D. (2020). The rise of illiberal politics in Southeast Europe. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 20(1), 1-17.
    Kekic, L. (2007). The Economist Intelligence Unit’s index of democracy. The Economist, 21, 1-11.
    Labastin, B. (2018). Two Faces of Dutertismo: Two Visions of Democracy in the Philippines. Social Ethics Society Journal of Applied Philosophy, 4(3), 31-54.
    Labrador, M. C. (2001). The Philippines in 2000 In Search of a Silver Lining..., Asian Survey, 41(1), 221-229.
    Labrador, M. C. (2002). The Philippines in 2001: High Drama, a New President, and Setting the Stage for Recovery. Asian Survey, 42(1), 141- 149.
    Levitsky, S. & D. Ziblatt (2018). How Democracies Die: What History Reveals About Our Future. New York: Crown Publishing.
    Lindberg, S. I., M. Coppedge, J. Gerring & J. Teorell (2014). V-Dem: A New Way to Measure Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 25(3), 159-169.
    Lührmann, A., M. Tannenberg & S. I. Lindberg (2018). Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening New Avenues for the Comparative Study of Political Regimes, Politics and Governance, 6(1), 60-77.
    Machado, K. G. (1978). The Philippines in 1977: Beginning a "Return to Normalcy"?. Asian Survey, 18(2), 202-211.
    Machado, K. G. (1979). The Philippines 1978: Authoritarian Consolidation Continues. Asian Survey, 19(2), 131-140.
    Malin, H. S. (1985). The Philippines in 1984: Grappling with Crisis. Asian Survey, 25(2), 198-205.
    McCoy, A. W. (2017). Global Populism: A Lineage of Filipino Strongmen from Quezon to Marcos and Duterte. Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies, 32(1-2), 7-54.
    Montesano, M. J. (2003). The Philippines in 2002: Playing Politics, Facing Deficits, and Embracing Uncle Sam. Asian Survey, 43(1), 156-166.
    Montesano, M. J. (2004). The Philippines in 2003: Troubles, None of Them New. Asian Survey, 44(1), 93-101.
    Montinola, G. R. (1999). The Philippines in 1998: Opportunity amid Crisis. Asian Survey, 39(1), 64-71.
    Mounk, Y. (2020). The End of History Revisited. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 22-35.
    Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563.
    Nadeau, K. (2008). The History of the Philippines. London: Greenwood Press.
    Negrea-Busuioc, E., R. Buturoiu & N. Corbu (2019). Populism and Illiberal Democracy in Romania: The Role of Media in the Erosion of Romanian Democracy. In Proceedings of the 6th Academos Conference, Political and Economic Unrest in the Contemporary Era (pp. 174-183.)
    Neher, C. (1980). The Philippines 1979: Cracks in the Fortress. Asian Survey, 20(2), 155-167.
    Neher, C. (1981). The Philippines in 1980: The Gathering Storm. Asian Survey, 21(2), 261-273.
    Niksch, L. (2007, January). Abu Sayyaf: Target of Philippine-U.S. Anti-Terrorism Cooperation. Library of Congress Washington DC Congressional Research Service.
    Nodia, G. (2020). Democracy’s Inevitable Elites. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 75-87.
    Norrlof, C. (2019). Educate to Liberate: Open Socities Need Open Minds. Foreign Affairs, 98(2), 132-141.
    Overholt, W. H. (1986). The Rise and Fall of Ferdinand Marcos. Asian Survey, 26(11), 1137-1163.
    Pappas, T. S. (2019). Populists in Power. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 70-84.
    Pauwels, T. (2017). Measuring Populism: A Review of Current Approaches. In Heinisch, R., C. Holtz-Bacha & O. Mazzoleni (Eds.), Political Populism: A Handbook (International Studies on Populism) (pp. 123-136). Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
    Plattner, M. (2010). Populism, Pluralism, and Liberal democracy. Journal of Democracy, 21(1), 81-92.
    Quimpo, N. G. (2009). The Philippines: predatory regime, growing authoritarian features. The Pacific Review, 22(3), 335-353.
    Reid, B. (2001). The Philippine democratic uprising and the contradictions of neoliberalism: EDSA II. Third World Quarterly, 22(5), 777-793.
    Riedinger, J. (1994). The Philippines in 1993: Halting Steps toward Liberalization. Asian Survey, 34(2), 139-146.
    Riedinger, J. (1995). The Philippines in 1994: Renewed Growth and Contested Reforms. Asian Survey, 35(2), 209-216.
    Rivera, T. C. (2005). The Philippines in 2004: New Mandate, Daunting Problems. Asian Survey, 45(1), 127-133.
    Romero, S. E. (1998). The Philippines in 1997: Weathering Political and Economic Turmoil. Asian Survey, 38(2), 196-202.
    Schenkkan, N. & S. Repucci (2019). The Freedom House Survey for 2018: Democracy in Retreat. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 100-114.
    Schulz, A., P. Müller, C. Schemer, D. S. Wirz, M. Wettstein & W. Wirth (2018). Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(2), 316-326.
    Shin, G. W. (2020). South Korea’s Democratic Decay. Journal of Democracy, 31(3), 100-114.
    Sidel, J. T. (2014). The Philippines in 2013: Disappointment, Disgrace, Disaster. Asian Survey, 54(1), 64-70.
    Sidel, J. T. (2015). The Philippines in 2014: Aquino Fights Back. Asian Survey, 55(1), 220-227.
    Silliman, G. S. (1984). The Philippines in 1983: Authoritarianism Beleaguered. Asian Survey, 24(2), 149-158.
    Sodusta, J. & A. Palongpalong (1982). The Philippines in 1981: Normalization and Instability. Southeast Asian Affairs 1982, 285-299.
    Stockemer, Daniel (Eds) (2019). Populism Around the World: A Comparative Perspective. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96758-5.
    Suorsa, O. & M. R. Thompson (2017). Choosing Sides? Illiberalism and Hedging in the Philippines and Thailand. Panorama Insights into Asian and European Affairs, 2, 63-76.
    Teehankee, J. C. & M. R. Thompson (2016). The Vote in the Philippines: Electing a Strongman. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 125-134.
    Teehankee, J. C. & Y. Kasuya (2020). The 2019 midterm elections in the Philippines: Party system pathologies and Duterte’s populist mobilization. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 5(1), 69-81.
    Teehankee, J. C. (2021). The Philippines in 2020: COVID-19 Pandemic Threatens Duterte’s Populist Legacy. Asian Survey, 61(1), 130-137.
    Thompson, M. R. (1996). Off the Endangered List: Philippine Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Politics, 28(2), 179- 205.
    Thompson, M. R. (2010). Reformism vs. Populism in the Philippines. Journal of Democracy, 21(4), 154-168.
    Thompson, M. R. (2016). Bloodied democracy: Duterte and the death of liberal reformism in the Philippines. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35(3), 39-68.
    Thompson, M. R. (2016). The Early Duterte Presidency in the Philippines. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35(3), 3-14.
    Thompson, M. R. (2016). The Specter of Neo-Authoritarianism in the Philippines. Current History, 115(782), 220-225.
    Tigno, J. V. (2018). The Philippines in 2017: Popularity Breeds Contempt. Asian Survey, 58(1), 142-148.
    Timberman, D. G. (1990). The Philippines in 1989: A Good Year Turns Sour. Asian Survey, 30(2), 167-177.
    Timberman, D. G. (1991). The Philippines in 1990: On Shaky Ground. Asian Survey, 31(2), 153-163.
    Timberman, D. G. (2016). The Vote in the Philippines: Elite Democracy Disrupted?. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 135-144.
    Tormey, S. (2018). Populism: democracy's Pharmakon?. Policy Studies, 39(3), 260-273.
    Villegas, B. M. (1986). The Philippines in 1985: Rolling with the Political Punches. Asian Survey, 26(2), 127-140.
    Villegas, B. M. (1987). The Philippines in 1986: Democratic Reconstruction in the Post-Marcos Era. Asian Survey, 27(2), 194-205.
    Woods, D. (2014). The Many Faces of Populism: Diverse but Not Disparate. In Woods, D. & B. Wejnert (Eds.), The many faces of populism: Current perspectives. (pp. 1-25). UK: Bingley.
    Wu, C. E. & Y. H. Chu (2019). Populism in Taiwan: A Bottom-up Model. The East Asia Institute, 2019.
    Youngblood, R. L. (1983). The Philippines in 1982: Marcos Gets Tough with Domestic Critics. Asian Survey, 25(2), 208-216.
    Youngblood, R. L. (1986). The Philippines in 1985: A Continuing Crisis of Confidence. Southeast Asian Affairs 1986 (pp. 225-238). ISEAS Publishing.
    Youngblood, R. L. (1987). The Corazon Aquino "Miracle" and the Philippine Churches. Asian Survey, 27(12), 1240-1255.¬
    Youngs, R. (2015). Exploring “Non-Western Democracy”. Journal of Democracy, 26(4), 140-155.
    Zakaria, F. (1997). The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22-43.
    三、 網路資料
    BBC News中文(2019,2月19日)。菲律賓「最危險」的女人瑞薩被抓和持續受制的東南亞新聞自由。BBC News中文。https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-47277472。
    公視新聞網(2011,8月02日)。馬可仕家族復出 3人當選議員省長。公視新聞網。https://news.pts.org.tw/article/152638。
    陳正健(2016,5月28日)。菲律賓總統大選 馬可仕之子落敗。自由時報網。https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/paper/994694。
    聯合新聞網(2021,10月9日)。演哪齣?菲律賓總統大選登記截止 杜特蒂女兒沒報名。聯合新聞網。https://udn.com/news/story/6809/580462。
    聯合新聞網(2021,11月11日)。最後一刻參選菲總統?杜特蒂長女薩拉加入新政黨。聯合新聞網。https://udn.com/news/story/6809/5884732。
    ABS-CBN News (2009, December 04). Arroyo Proclaims Martial Law in Maguindanao. ABS-CBN News. https://news.abs-cbn.com/nation/12/04/09/arroyo-orders-martial-law-maguindanao.
    Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative (2016, February 01). Philippine Supreme Court Approves EDCA: Unlocking the Door for the Return of U.S. Strategic Footprint in Southeast Asia. Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. https://amti.csis.org/philippine-supreme-court-approves-edca-unlocking-door-return-u-s-strategic-footprint-southeast-asia/.
    BBC News (2019, May 22). Profile: Duterte the Controversial 'Strongman' of the Philippines. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-36659258.
    BBC News (2020, May 05). ABS-CBN: Philippines' Biggest Broadcaster Forced Off Air. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-52548703.
    Bertelsmann Stiftung (2021), The BTI Transformation Index, Bertelsmann Stiftung Methodology. https://bti-project.org/en/methodology.html.
    Burgess, J. & W. Branigin (1986, February 17). Aquino Issues Call for Peaceful Protests. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1986/02/17/aquino-issues-call-for-peaceful-protests/6462d05f-63c9-4339-8adf-3bf18fc9d4e0/.
    Center for System Peace (2021). Polity 5 Regime Narratives 2018. Center for System Peace. https://www.systemicpeace.org/p5creports.html.
    CNN Philippines (2015, August 17). Senate Defers BBL Deliberations. CNN Philippines. https://cnnphilippines.com/news/2015/08/17/Bangsamoro-Basic-Law-BBL-deliberations-senate-house-of-representatives-deferred.html.
    CNN Philippines (2016, August 21). Estrada Favors Marcos Burial at LNMB: 'We should respect the dead'. CNN Philippines. https://cnnphilippines.com/news/2016/08/21/estrada-favors-marcos-heros-burial-libingan-ng-mga-bayani.html.
    CNN Philippines (2020, October 5). Duterte Approval Rating Rises to 91% ㄇamid Pandemic Cayetano Suffers Drop – survey. CNN Philippines. https://www.cnnphilippines.com/news/2020/10/5/Duterte-approval-trust-rating-COVID-19-September-2020-Pulse-Asia-survey.html.
    Dedace, S. (2010, December 07). High Court Declares Truth Commission Unconstitutional. GMA News Online. https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/nation/207710/high-court-declares-truth-commission-unconstitutional/story/.
    Dollanganger, C. (2020, July 20). What Do Critics and Supporters of the Philippines Anti-Terrorism Bill Say?. The News Lens關鍵評論. https://international.thenewslens.com/article/138072.
    Ethnologue: Languages of the World (2020). Philippines. Internet Archive. https://web.archive.org/web/20190428121321/https://www.ethnologue.com/country/PH.
    Freedom House (2021). Country and Territory Ratings and Statuses (1973- 2021). Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world.
    Freedom House (2021). Freedom in the World Research Methodology. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-world/freedom-world-research-methodology.
    Hammar, O. & D. Waldenström (2017). Global Earnings Inequality, 1970–2015. Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=1201.
    Hungarian Government (2014). Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s Speech at the 25th Bálványos Summer Free University and Student Camp. The Prime Minister's speeches. https://www.kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/prime-minister-viktor-orban-s-speech-at-the-25th-balvanyos-summer-free-university-and-student-camp.
    Kossow, N. (2019, January 14). Populism and Corruption. Transparency International. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/helpdesk/populism-and-corruption-2019-final.pdf.
    Macrotrends (2021). Philippines Crime Rate & Statistics 1990-2021. Macrotrends. https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/PHL/philippines/crime-rate-statistics.
    Manila Standard (2018, December 21). Philconsa to SC: BOL Will 'Destroy Country, Dismember Territories'. Manila Standard Net. https://manilastandard.net/news/top-stories/283533/philconsa-to-sc-bol-will-destroy-country-dismember-territories-.html.
    Marshall, M. G. & K. Jaggers (2006). Polity IV Project: Dataset Users’Manual. Polity IV Project. https://home.bi.no/a0110709/PolityIV_manual.pdf.
    Mechkova, V. & R. Sigman (2016). Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem). V-Dem Institute Policy Brief. https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/f9/08/f908eb53-c0e2-40f0-9294-e067537d8f0b/v-dem_policybrief_5_2016.pdf.
    Philippine News Agency (2021). Total Crime Volume Drops 39.59% in 2020: PNP. Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1126251.
    Philippine Statistics Authority (2001). 2001 Philippine Statistical Yearbook. Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/PSY2001.pdf.
    Philippine Statistics Authority (2012). 2011 Annual Labor and Employment Status (Comparative Annual Estimates for 2010 and 2011). Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/content/2011-annual-labor-and-employment-status-comparative-annual-estimates-2010-and-2011.
    Philippine Statistics Authority (2012). 2012 Annual Labor and Employment Status (Annual estimates for 2012). Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/content/2012-annual-labor-and-employment-status-annual-estimates-2012.
    Philippine Statistics Authority (2013). 2013 Annual Labor and Employment Status (Annual estimates for 2013). Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/content/2013-annual-labor-and-employment-status-annual-estimates-2013.
    Philippine Statistics Authority (2014). 2014 Annual Labor and Employment Status (Comparative Annual Estimates for 2014 and 2013). Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/content/2015-annual-labor-and-employment-status-preliminary-results-2015-annual-estimates.
    Philippine Statistics Authority (2014). 2014 Yearbook of Labor Statistics. Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/2014YLS_0.pdf.
    Philippine Statistics Authority (2015). 2015 Annual Labor and Employment Status (Preliminary results of the 2015 annual estimates). Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/content/2015-annual-labor-and-employment-status-preliminary-results-2015-annual-estimates.
    Philippine Statistics Authority (2016). 2016 Annual Labor and Employment Status, Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/content/2016-annual-labor-and-employment-status.
    Philippine Statistics Authority (2017). 2017 Annual Labor and Employment Status. Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/content/2017-annual-labor-and-employment-status.
    Philippine Statistics Authority (2018). 2018 Annual Labor and Employment Status. Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/content/2018-annual-labor-and-employment-status.
    Philippine Statistics Authority (2019). 2019 Annual Labor and Employment Status. Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/content/preliminary-results-2019-annual-estimates-labor-force-survey-lfs.
    Philippine Statistics Authority (2021). 2020 Annual Preliminary Estimates of Labor Force Survey (LFS). Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/content/preliminary-results-2019-annual-estimates-labor-force-survey-lfs.
    Polity IV (2014). Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions 1800-2013. Polity IV. https://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.
    Reformina, I. (2016, January 12). SC Rules EDCA Is Constitutional. ABS-CBN News. https://news.abs-cbn.com/nation/01/12/16/sc-rules-edca-is-constitutional.
    Reuters (2021, July 13). Duterte-Duterte a Winning Ticket in Poll on Philippines election. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/duterte-duterte-winning-ticket-poll-philippines-election-2021-07-13/?enowpopup.
    Rooduijn, M., S. Van Kessel, C. Froio, A. Pirro, S. De Lange, D. Halikiopoulou, P. Lewis, C. Mudde & P. Taggart (2019). The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe. The PopuList. www.popu-list.org.
    Salaverria, L. (2013, February 03). Arroyo Cleared of Negligence Rap over Maguindanao Massacre. Inquirer.net. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/352049/arroyo-cleared-of-negligence-rap-over-maguindanao-massacre.
    Social Weather Stations (2020). Fourth Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey: Pres. Duterte's Net Satisfaction at New Record "Excellent" +72. Social Weather Stations. https://www.sws.org.ph/swsmain/artcldisppage/?artcsyscode=ART-20200121185102&mc_cid=2f1f214732&mc_eid=31b9d30a85.
    The Brussels Times (2020, March 9). Hungary Only EU Member State Ranked as Partly Free. The Brussels Times. https://www.brusselstimes.com/news/eu-affairs/99373/hungary-only-eu-member-state-ranked-as-partly-free/.
    The Global State of Democracy Indices (2021). About. The Global State of Democracy Indices. https://www.idea.int/gsod-indices/about.
    The Irish Times (2003, November 10). Philippines in Crisis over Impeachment Bid. The Irish Times. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/philippines-in-crisis-over-impeachment-bid-1.509887.
    The Malacañang Palace Presidential Museum and Library (2021). Elections of 1981. Presidential Museum and Library. http://malacanang.gov.ph/74710-elections-of-1981/.
    The Manila Times (2010, January 21). Erap Can Run – Comelec. The Manila Times. https://www.manilatimes.net/2010/01/21/news/headlines/erap-can-run-comelec/636427/?fromt=yes.
    The Philippine Star (2020, January 02). Martial Law Lifted but Mindanao Still Under State of Emergency. The Philippine Star. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2020/01/02/1981465/mindanao-still-under-state-emergency-amid-martial-law-lifted.
    The World Bank (2021). GDP Growth (annual %) – Philippines. The World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?end=2020&locations=PH&start=1961&view=chart.
    The World Bank (2021). Gini Index (World Bank estimate) – Philippines. The World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI?locations=PH.
    Timbro Authoritarian Populism Index (2021). The Data Methodology. Timbro Authoritarian Populism Index. https://populismindex.com/data/.
    United Press International (1989, December 06). Aquino Orders State of Emergency: Philippines: The government has placed restrictions on radio and TV broadcasts. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-12-06-mn-367-story.html.
    V-Dem (2021). Country Graph. V-Dem Institute. https://www.v-dem.net/data_analysis/VariableGraph/.
    V-Dem (2021). The V-Dem Project. V-Dem Institute. https://www.v-dem.net/project.html.
    Vergel, O. S. (2019, May 24). The Philippines Just Became More Authoritarian, Thanks to the People. The New Yorks Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/24/opinion/philippines-duterte-election-senate.html?smid=url-share

    下載圖示
    QR CODE