簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃嘉彬
Chia-Pin Huang
論文名稱: 知覺缺口跨越之環境賦使: 準確度、預測因子與年齡效應
Perceiving affordances for gap crossing: Accuracy, predictors, and age effect
指導教授: 卓俊伶
Jwo, Jun-Ling
陳重佑
Chen, Chung-Yu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 72
中文關鍵詞: 直接知覺環境賦使缺口跨越年齡差異
英文關鍵詞: direct perception, affordance, gap crossing, age differences
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:257下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘  要
      個體藉感官捕捉外在環境所釋放出有意義之訊息作為行動依據,再透過行動以知覺更多環境線索,此為知覺-行動聯結之過程。本研究以生態手段之直接知覺觀點探討此議題,找尋不同年齡族群於缺口判斷與實際跨越距離之差異情形、影響因子以及主成分類別。本實驗之參與者為21名兒童、18名成人與19名老年人,先測量身高、眼高、腿長、腿部肌力與髖關節柔軟度後進行一循環長度由50公分至130公分之缺口判斷測驗與實際跨越測驗。以3 (年齡) × 2 (跨越情境) 混合設計二因子變異數分析 (two-way ANOVA)、逐步迴歸之方式檢驗判斷跨越與實際跨越是否與個體因子有正相關、以及主成分分析法歸類影響因子之共同特質。結果發現:(一) 兒童族群與老年人族群之判斷跨越與實際跨越距離相對於成年人有顯著差異、(二) 髖關節柔軟度和三族群實際跨越之結果有正相關,另外老年人之判斷跨越和眼高、腿長以及髖關節柔軟度亦有正相關,實際跨越和判斷跨越以及腿部肌力也有正相關、和 (三) 影響三族群之個體因子皆可分成身體肢段參數以及身體適能因素兩大主成分;不同族群之此二主成分累積解釋變異量均高於66%,可良好代表原始變數。結論為:(一) 相較於成人,缺口跨越之知覺-行動聯結準確度在兒童與老年人時期較低、(二) 髖關節柔軟度是兒童、成人以及老年人實際跨越距離之相關因子;眼高、腿長以及髖關節柔軟度亦是老年人判斷跨越之相關因子;判斷跨越以及腿部肌力也是老年人實際跨越之相關因子、和 (三) 影響兒童、成人以及老年人之相關因素皆可歸類為身體肢段參數以及身體適能因素兩大特質。

    Abstract

      Individuals catch up the relevant information which released from the external environment through their sense organs for action, and also get more information then before from the extrinsic environment by action. That is the coupling between perception and action. There were 22 children, 18 adults and 19 old people joined in this experiment. The body height, eye-height, leg length, leg strength, and the range of motion in hip were measured before the judge and actual crossing test. All the participants were asked to perform one round judge and another round actual crossing, the gap increased five centimeters trial by trial. 3 (age) × 2 (crossing) mixed design two-way ANOVA, stepwise regression and principal component analysis were used to examine the perception-action coupling ability, correlation between crossing and individual factors, and same qualities that to be categorized. The results showed that: The diversity between judge and actual crossing in children and old people were higher than adults. The range of motion in hip as the predict parameter of actual gap crossing in these three ages were validity. The eye height and leg length were also positively correlated to old peoples’ judged gap crossing; the perceptual result and the leg strength were also positively correlated to actual gap crossing, and all of the predictors can be categorized into two major portions. It means that individuals can judge the environment not only by body-scaled ratio, but also physical fitness factors such as hip flexibility and leg strength. The cumulative explained variances surpasses 66% in three ages, it means the variance was effective to explain original scores. The conclusions were: (1) Children and old people have lower perception-action coupling ability than adults, (2) The range of motion in hip can be the predictor of actual crossing in each age group. The eye height, leg length and range of motion in hip can also be the predictors of judged crossing for old people. Judged crossing result and leg strength were the predictors of actual crossing in old people, and (3) all the predictors can be categorized into two portions, body scaled ratio and physical fitness factors.

    目 次 頁次 授權書……………………………………………………………………… i 口試委員與系主任簽字證書……………………………………………… iii 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………… iv 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………… v 謝誌………………………………………………………………………… vi 目次………………………………………………………………………… vii 圖次………………………………………………………………………… ix 表次………………………………………………………………………… x 第壹章 緒論…………………………………………………………………1 第一節 問題背景………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究問題………………………………………………………9 第三節 研究假定與限制………………………………………………10 第四節 名詞解釋………………………………………………………10 第五節 研究之重要性…………………………………………………13 第貳章 理論基礎與文獻探討……………………………………………14 第一節 生態手段………………………………………………………14 第二節 行動-知覺聯結………………………………………………15 第三節 限制觀點………………………………………………………18 第四節 知覺與行動相關文獻探討……………………………………20 第五節 文獻回顧小結…………………………………………………23 第六節 假說……………………………………………………………24 第參章 方法………………………………………………………………25 第一節 研究架構………………………………………………………25 第二節 實驗參與者……………………………………………………25 第三節 實驗器材………………………………………………………26 第四節 實驗場地與佈置………………………………………………26 第五節 實驗程序與工作要求…………………………………………27 第六節 資料處理與分析………………………………………………29 第肆章 結果………………………………………………………………31 第一節 各項影響因子之檢測資料……………………………………31 第二節 各年齡層之影響因子差異……………………………………36 第三節 各因子之影響程度與排序情形………………………………37 第伍章 討論………………………………………………………………41 第一節 各年齡層於判斷跨越距離與實際跨越距離 之差異探討………………………………………………………41 第二節 各年齡層判斷缺口跨越距離與實際跨越之 影響因子探討……………………………………………………43 第三節 五項影響因子於不同年齡層預測力大小之比較……………47 第四節 綜合討論………………………………………………………48 第陸章 結論與建議………………………………………………………51 第一節 結論……………………………………………………………51 第二節 建議……………………………………………………………52 引用文獻 ……………………………………………………………………53 中文部分 …………………………………………………………53 英文部分 …………………………………………………………53 附錄 …………………………………………………………………………61     附錄一 參加者須知及同意………………………………………62

    引用文獻

    中文部分
    王俊杰(2004)。男性晚期兒童定跳遠動作表現的相關因素。未出版碩士
       論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。

    林震岩(2006)。多變量分析:SPSS的操作與應用。臺北市:智勝文化。

    林正常(1994)。運動生理學實驗指引。臺北市:師大書苑。

    彭鈺人(2000)。體育測驗與測量。臺北市:師大書苑。

    彭國威(2003)。晚期兒童之環境知覺與踢球動作支撐腳參數:身體比例。
       未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。

    張春興(1998)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。

    英文部分
    Adolph, K. E. (1995). Psychophysical assessment of toddlers’ ability to cope with slope. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 734-750.

    Adolph, K. E., & Avolio, A. M. (2000). Walking infants adapt locomotion to changing body dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 1148-1166.

    Adolph, K. E., Vereijken, B., & Shrout, P. E. (2003). What changes in infant walking and why. Children Development, 74(2), 475-497.

    American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. (1998). Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30, 992-1008.

    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Benenson, J., & Dweck, C. (1986). The development of trait explanations and self-evaluations in the academic and social domains. Child Development, 57, 1179-1187.

    Bingham, G. P., & Pagano, C. C. (1998). The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: Monocular distance perception to guide reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 145-168.

    Burton, A. W., & Davis, W. E. (1996). Ecological task analysis utilizing intrinsic measures in research and practice. Human Movement Science, 15, 285-314.

    Burton, G. (1992). Nonvisual judgment of the crossability of path gaps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 698-713.

    Burton, G. (1993). Non-neural extensions of haptic sensitivity. Ecological Psychology, 5, 105-124.

    Burton, G. (1994). Crossing without vision of path gaps. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 147-161.

    Burton, G., & Cyr, J. (2004). Gap crossing decision in the sighted and visually impaired. Ecological Psychology, 16(4), 303-317.

    Carello, C., Grosofsky, A., Reichel, F. D., Solomon, H. Y., & Turvey, M. T. (1989). Visually perceiving what is reachable. Ecological Psychology, 1(1), 27-54.

    Cesari, P., Formenti, F., & Olovato, P. (2003). A common perceptual parameter for stair climbing for children, young and old adults. Human Movement Science, 22, 111-124.

    Chase, M. A., Ewing, M. E., Lirgg, C. D., & George, T. R. (1994). The effects of equipment modification on childrens’ self-efficacy and basketball shooting   performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports,
    65(2), 159-168.

    Chemero, A., Klein, C., & Cordeiro, W. (2003). Events as changes in the layout of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(1), 19-28.

    Choi, H. J., & Mark, L. S. (2004). Scaling affordances for human reach actions. Human Movement Science, 23, 785-806.

    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum.

    Cornus, S., Montagne, G., & Laurent, M. (1999). Perception of stepping-across affordance. Ecological Psychology, 11, 249-267.

    Davis, W. E., & Burton, A. W. (1991). Ecological task analysis: Translating movement behavior theory into practice. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,8,154-177.
    Fagard, J., & Lockman, J. J. (2005). The effect of task constraints on infants’(bi)manual strategy for grasping and exploring objects. Infant Behavior & Development, 28, 305-315.

    Feltz, D. L., & Riessinger, C. A. (1990). Effects on in vivo emotive imagery and performance feedback on self-efficacy and muscular endurance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 132-143.

    Fry, M. D., & Duda, J. L. (1997). A developmental examination of childrens’understanding of effort and ability in the physical and academic domain. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68(4), 331-345.

    Gabbard, C. P. (2004). Lifelong motor development (3rd ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.

    Gallahue, D. L., & Ozmun, J. C. (2002). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Gentile, A. M. (2000). Skill acquisition: Action, movement, and neuromotor processes. In J. H. Carr, & R. B. Shepherd (Eds.), Movement science: Foundations for physical therapy (2nd ed., pp. 111-187). Rockville, MD: Aspen.

    Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Haywood, K. M., & Gatchell, N. (2001). Life span motor development (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Hirose, N., & Nishio, A. (2001). The process of adaptation to perceiving new action capabilities. Ecological
    Psychology, 13(1), 49-69.

    Jiang, Y., & Mark, L. S. (1994). The effect of gap depth on the perception of weather a path is crossable. Perception and Psychophysics, 56(6), 691-700.

    Kamm, K., Thelen, E., & Jensen, J. L. (1990). A dynamical systems approach to motor development. Physical Therapy, 70, 763-775.

    Kelso, J. A. S. (1997). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Kingsnorth, S., & Schumuckler, M. A. (2000). Walking skill versus walking experience as a predictor of barrier crossing in toddler. Infant Behavior & Development, 27, 163-172.

    Konczak, J., Meeuwsen, H. J., & Cress, M. E. (1992). Changing affordances in stair climbing: The perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 691-697.

    Ledebt, A., & Bril, B. (2000). Acquisition of upper body stability during walking in toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 36, 311-324.

    Laurent, M., & Thomson, J. A. (1988). The role of visual information in control of a constrained locomotor task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 17-37.

    Maraj, B. K. V. (2003). Perceptual judgments for stair climbing as a function of pitch angle. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports, 74(3), 248-256.

    Mark, L. S., Jiang, Y., King, S. S., & Paasche, J. (1999). The impact of visual exploration on judgements of whether a gap is crossable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 287- 295.

    Mark, L. S., Balliett, J. A., Craver, K. D., Douglas, S. D., & Fox, T. (1990). What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. Ecological Psychology, 2(4), 325-366.

    Mark, L. S., & Vogele, D. (1987). A biodynamic basis for perceived categories of action: A study of sitting and stair climbing. Journal of Motor Behavior,19(3), 367-384.

    Mark, L.S. (1987). Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: A study of sitting and stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(3), 361-370.

    Mark, L. S., Nemeth, K., Gardner, D., Dainoff, M. J., Paasche, J., & Duffy, M. et al. (1997). Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(5), 1365-1379.

    Matlin, M. W., & Foley, H. J. (1997). Sensation and perception. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    McAdrew, F. T. (1993). Environment psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    McFadyen, B. J., & Winter, D. A. (1988). An integrated biomechanical analysis of normal stair ascent and descent. Journal of Biomechanics, 21(9), 733-744.

    Michaels, C. F., & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Montagne, G., Cornus, S., Gilze, D., Quaine, F., & Laurent, M. (2000). A perception-action coupling type of control in long jumping. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32(1), 37-43.

    Natsoulas, T. (2004). “To see things is to perceive what they afford”: James J. Gibson’s concept of affordance. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 25, 323-348.

    Newell, K. M. (1985). Coordination, control, and skill. In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg, & I. M. Franks (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control (pp. 295-317). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Newell, K. M., & McDonald, P. V. (1992). Practice: A search for task solution. In American Academy of Physical Education (Eds.), Enhancing human performance in sport: New concepts and developments (pp. 51-59). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination . In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341-361). Amsterdam: Martius Nijhoff.

    Oudejans, R. R, Michaels, C. F., van Dort, B., & Frissen E. J. P. (1996). To cross or not to cross: The effect of locomotion on street-crossing behavior. Ecological Psychology, 8(3), 259-267.

    Oudejans, R. R., Michaels, C. F., Bakker, F. C., & Dolne, M. A. (1996). The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: Perception of catchableness of fly balls.
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(4), 879-891.

    Payne, V. G., & Isaacs, L. D. (2002). Human motor development: A lifespan approach (5th ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Pufall, P. B., & Dunbar, C. (1992). Perceiving whether or not the world affords stepping onto and over: A development study. Ecological Psychology, 4(1), 17-38.

    Reed, E. S. (1982). An outline of a theory of action system. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14(2), 98-134.

    Rochat, P., & Wraga, M. (1997). An account of the systematic error in judging what is reachable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(1), 199-212.

    Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Schumuckler, M. A. (1996). Development of visual-guided locomotion: Barrier crossing by toddlers. Ecological Psychology, 8, 209-236.

    Sekuler, R., & Blake, R. (2002). Perception (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2001). From the dynamics of motor skill to the dynamics of development. In L. B. Smith, & E. Thelen (Eds.), A dynamic system approach to development: Applications (pp. 1-11). Cambridge, MA: MIT
    Press.

    Spirduso, W. W., Francis, K. L., & MacRae, P. G. (2005). Physical dimensions of aging (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Stoffregen, T. A. (2000). Affordances and events. Ecological Psychology, 12(1), 1-28.

    Stoffregen, T. A., Yang, C. M., & Bardy, B. G. (2005). Affordance judgements and nonlocomotor body movement. Ecological Psychology, 17(2), 75-104.

    Turvey, M. T., & Carello, C. (1988). Exploring a law-based, ecological approach to skilled action. In A. M. Colley & J. R. Beech (Eds.), Cognition and action in skilled behavior (pp. 191-203). North-Holland: Elsevier Science.

    Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R. E., Reed, E. S., & Mace, W. M. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981). Cognition, 9, 237-304.

    Ulrich, B. D., Thelen, E., & Niles, D. (1990). Perceptual determinants of action: Stair-climbing choices of infants and toddlers. In J. E. Clark & J. H. Humphrey (Eds.), Advances in motor development research vol. 3 (pp.1-15). New York: AMS Press.

    Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 683-703.

    Warren, W. H., & Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 371-383.

    Warren, W. H., Kay, B. A., & Yilmaz, E. H. (1996). Visual control of posture during walking: Functional specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(4), 818-838.

    Warren, W. H., Young, D. S., & Lee, D. N. (1986). Visual control of step length during running over irregular terrain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(3), 259-266.

    Williams, A. M., Davids, K., & Williams, J. G. (1999). Visual perception and action in sport. New York: E & FN Spon.

    Woodruff-Park, D. (1988). Psychology and aging. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Wright, B. M., Carscaddon, D. M., & Lambert, S. D. (2000). Sex, education, age and cautiousness: Implications for counselors. Adultspan: Theory Research and Practice, 2(2), 113-122.

    Zwart, R., Ledebt, A., Fong, B. F., Vries, H., & Savelsbergh, G. J. (2005). The affordances of gap crossing in toddlers. Infant Psychology & Development, 28, 145-154.

    QR CODE