簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 倪慧喜
Nee Hui-hsi
論文名稱: 不同類型高中資優生與普通生過度激動特質與自閉症光譜特質之比較研究
A Comparative Study of Overexcitabilities and Autism Spectrum Conditions among Regular and Different Kinds of Gifted and Talent Senior High School Students
指導教授: 郭靜姿
Kuo, Ching-Chih
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 205
中文關鍵詞: 過度激動自閉症光譜資優生
英文關鍵詞: overexcitability, autism spectrum, gifted student
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:609下載:54
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究主要探討不同類型高中資優生與普通生過度激動特質與自閉症特質以及兩者間的相關、預測。研究以全國北中南東四個區域不同類型高中資優生與普通生做為研究對象,以我的特質量表(Ⅱ)(N=855)與自閉症光譜量表(N=846)為主要研究工具。所得資料以平均數、百分比、卡方檢定、二因子變異數分析、相關以及多元逐步迴歸等方式進行分析。茲將本研究之結果說明如下:
一、 不同類別與性別受試者在我的特質量表(Ⅱ)之表現
數理與人文資優生在「智能」過度激動特質上較藝術類資優生與普通生明顯;人文資優生在「想像」與「情緒」過度激動較強烈;藝術類資優生在「情緒」過度激動較強烈,普通生則無任一過度激動特質較明顯。性別間的過度激動特質也具有差異,男生在「心理動作」較強烈;女生則在「感官」與「情緒」較明顯。
二、 不同類別與性別受試者在自閉症光譜量表之表現
整體自閉症光譜特質以數理資優生最為明顯。在「社交技巧」方面之特質人文與數理資優生都較為明顯,在「溝通」方面數理資優生又較普通生明顯。男生在「溝通」與「想像」方面特質較女生明顯。
三、 過度激動特質與自閉症光譜特質之相關
不同類型資優生與普通生兩特質間相關強度不同,但方向一致。「情緒變異性」過度激動與自閉症特質有較高的正相關;過度激動特質與「對細節的注意力」屬正相關,與「社交技巧」屬負相關。
四、 過度激動特質對自閉症光譜特質之預測
最能預測自閉症光譜特質之過度激動特質為「情緒變異性」、「想像力」、「同理心」、「生理激動」、「智能激動」、「創造力」等過度激動特質。
最後根據研究結果對教學、輔導以及未來研究方向提出建議。

This research primarily compares the typical qualities of overexcitabilities and autism spectrum conditions among gifted and regular students in senior high schools. The target participants of the research are different types of gifted and regular students located in the northern, southern, eastern, and middle part of the nation, with The Me ScalⅡ (N=855) and Autism Spectrum Quotient (N=846) as the primary research instrument. The analysis of the information obtained includes statistic average, percentage, and two-way analysis of variance, correlation, multiple stepwise regression analysis, etc. The main results of the research are as follows:

1. The performance of various types of subjects with different genders on The Me ScaleⅡ
Students who excel in mathematics and social sciences show more significant intellectual overexcitability compared with those who excel in art or ordinary students. Peers gifted in social science also demonstrate significant imaginative and emotional overexcitability, while those gifted in art present higher emotional overexcitability, and typical developed student does not exhibit any apparent overexcitability. Gender also plays an important role in determining overexcitability. For example, males are stronger in the psychomotor, but females are more dominant in sensual and emotional overexcitability.
2. The performance of various types of subjects with different genders on autism spectrum conditions
Overall, students excel in mathematics are more dominant on the autism spectrum. In social skill area, students excel in mathematics and social sciences demonstrate a more typical trait, but mathematic gifted students are more dominant in the communication field than regular students. In addition, males show stronger traits than females in communication and imagination.
3. Correlation between overexcitability and autism spectrum conditions
Different types of gifted students and regular students demonstrate opposite strength, but similar directions. Emotional fluctuation overexcitability and autism spectrum conditions demonstrate a positive correlation, and overexcitability also shows a positive correlation with attention to detail, but a negative correlation with social skills.
4. Predictions on autism spectrum conditions using overexcitability
The most predictable qualities about autism spectrum conditions are emotional fluctuated, imaginative, empathetic, physical, intellectual, and creative overexcitabilities, etc.
Finally, recommendations on how to improve education and future research direction based on the result of the study.

目次 中文摘要 I 目次 V 圖次 VII 表次 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 研究問題 5 第四節 名詞釋義 7 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 資優生之特質 9 第二節 資優生的過度激動特質 14 第三節 自閉症光譜狀態之特質與表現 24 第四節 過度激動特質與自閉症光譜特質之相關 37 第三章 研究方法 53 第一節 研究架構 53 第二節 研究對象 55 第三節 研究工具 57 第四節 研究程序 60 第五節 資料分析與處理 62 第四章 結果與討論 65 第一節 各類資優生與普通生在過度激動特質量表之表現 65 第二節 各類資優生與普通生在自閉症光譜量表之表現 116 第三節 過度激動特質與自閉症光譜特質之相關 142 第五章 結論與建議 161 第一節 研究結論 161 第二節 研究限制 164 第三節 研究建議 165 參考文獻 169 附錄 附錄一 國內外過度激動特質相關實證研究整理 183 附錄二 我的特質量表(Ⅱ)使用同意書 195 附錄三 自閉症光譜量表使用同意書 197 附錄四 我的特質量表(Ⅱ)量表內容 199 附錄五 自閉症光譜特質量表 203 圖次 圖3-1-1 研究架構圖 54 圖4-1-1 各類資優生與普通生在過度激動特質各量表高分組百分比人數分配情形 72 圖4-1-2 不同性別受試者在過度激動特質各分量表高分組人數百分比分配情形 74   表次 表2-3-1 自閉症光譜狀態之評量工具整理 35 表2-4-1 亞斯伯格資優生與一般資優生行為特質整理 40 表2-4-2 心理動作過度激動特質與自閉症光譜狀態相關特質之比較對照表 45 表2-4-3 智能過度激動特質與自閉症光譜狀態相關特質之比較 46 表2-4-4 感官過度激動特質與自閉症光譜狀態相關特質之比較 47 表2-4-5 情緒過度激動特質與自閉症光譜狀態相關特質之比較 47 表2-4-6 想像過度激動特質與自閉症光譜狀態相關特質之比較 48 表3-2-1 我的特質量表(Ⅱ)有效樣本人數分配表 55 表3-2-2 自閉症光譜量表有效樣本人數分配表 56 表3-2-3 我的特質量表(Ⅱ)與自閉症光譜量表相關之有效樣本人數分配表 56 表4-1-1 不同性別、類別受試者在我的特質量表分量表(Ⅱ)之描述統計 69 表4-1-2 不同性別、類別學生在過度激動特質各分量表各題平均值之描述統計 69 表4-1-3 不同性別與類型學生在五種過度激動特質量表之描述統計 70 表4-1-4 不同性別與類型學生在過度激動特質各分量表各題平均值之描述統計 70 表4-1-5 不同類別受試者在我的特質量表(Ⅱ)低中高分組之人數分配表 74 表4-1-6 不同性別受試者在我的特質量表(Ⅱ)低中高分組之人數分配表 75 表4-1-7 不同類別受試者在心理與生理激動分量表各題作答強度百分比及Χ2檢定 78 表4-1-8 不同類別受試者在感官敏感與感官愉悅分量表各題作答強度百分比及Χ2檢定 79 表4-1-9 不同類別受試者在智能激動與完美主義分量表各題作答強度百分比及Χ2檢定 82 表4-1-10 不同類別受試者在創造力與想像力分量表各題作答強度百分比及Χ2檢定 84 表4-1-11 不同類別受試者在同理心與情緒變異性分量表各題作答強度百分比及Χ2檢定 86 表4-1-12 不同性別受試者在心理與生理激動分量表各題作答強度百分比及Χ2檢定 89 表4-1-13 不同性別受試者在感官敏銳與感官愉悅分量表各題作答強度百分比及Χ2檢定 90 表4-1-14 不同性別受試者在智能激動與完美主義分量表各題作答強度百分比及Χ2檢定 93 表4-1-15 不同性別受試者在智能激動與完美主義分量表各題作答強度百分比及Χ2檢定 94 表4-1-16 不同性別受試者在創造力與想像力分量表各題作答強度百分比及Χ2檢定 95 表4-1-17 不同類別與性別受試者在過度激動特質表現最強烈的特質 97 表4-1-18 「心理激動」過度激動特質分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 99 表4-1-19 「生理激動」過度激動分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 100 表4-1-20 「感官敏銳」過度激動分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 100 表4-1-21 「感官愉悅」過度激動分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 101 表4-1-22 「智能激動」過度激動分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 102 表4-1-23 「完美主義」過度激動分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 102 表4-1-24 「創造力」過度激動分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 103 表4-1-25 「想像力」過度激動分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 104 表4-1-26 「同理心」過度激動分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 104 表4-1-27 「情緒變異性」過度激動分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 105 表4-1-28 五種過度激動特質之二因子摘要分析表 107 表4-2-1 不同性別、類別受試者在自閉症光譜量表之描述統計 116 表4-2-2 不同類別資優生與普通生在「社交技巧」分量表各題之表現 121 表4-2-3 不同類別資優生與普通生在「注意力轉換」分量表各題之表現 122 表4-2-4 不同類別資優生與普通生在「對細節的注意力」分量表各題之表現 123 表4-2-5 不同類別資優生與普通生在「溝通」分量表各題之表現 124 表4-2-6 不同類別資優生與普通生在「想像」分量表各題之表現 125 表4-2-7 不同性別學生在「社交技巧」各題之表現 126 表4-2-8 不同性別學生在「注意力轉換」各題之表現 127 表4-2-9 不同性別學生在「對細節的注意力」各題之表現 128 表4-2-10 不同性別學生在「溝通」各題之表現 129 表4-2-11 不同性別學生在「想像」各題之表現 130 表4-2-12 不同類別與性別受試者在自閉症光譜量表中出現率最高之特質 133 表4-2-13 不同類別與性別學生在「社交技巧」分量表之單因子變異數分析摘要表 134 表4-2-14 自閉症光譜「注意力轉換」分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 135 表4-2-15 「對細節的注意力」自閉症光譜分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 135 表4-2-16 自閉症光譜「溝通」自閉症光譜分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 136 表4-2-17 自閉症光譜「想像」分量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 137 表4-2-18 自閉症光譜總量表之二因子變異數分析摘要表 137 表4-2-19 各類學生自閉症光譜高風險群比例之卡方檢定 138 表4-2-20 「社交技巧」與「溝通」兩分量表得分加總之二因子變異數分析摘要表 139 表4-3-1 過度激動特質量表與自閉症光譜量表得分之相關 146 表4-3-2 數理資優生過度激動特質量表與自閉症光譜量表得分之相關 147 表4-3-3 人文資優生過度激動特質量表與自閉症光譜量表得分之相關 148 表4-3-4 藝術資優生過度激動特質量表與自閉症光譜量表得分之相關 150 表4-3-5 普通生過度激動特質量表與自閉症光譜量表得分之相關 151 表4-3-6 男生過度激動特質量表與自閉症光譜量表得分之相關 153 表4-3-7 女生過度激動特質量表與自閉症光譜量表得分之相關 154 表4-3-8 過度激動特質對自閉症光譜特質迴歸模式之變異數分析摘要表 155 表4-3-9 過度激動特質對自閉症光譜特質多元逐步迴歸分析摘要表 156 表4-3-10 自閉症光譜障礙高風險組與一般組過度激動特質差異比較表 157

參考文獻
一、中文部分:
王保進(2006):英文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究(第三版)。臺北市,心理。
王瑋璘(2013):不同智力亞斯柏格症國中生之過度激動特質探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。
朱瑜華(2003):中部地區國小資優學生過度激動特質與創造力之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義。
吳昆壽(2006):資優教育概論。臺北市,心理。
吳沛青(2006):高雄市國小一般智能優異學生和普通生過度激動特質與生活適應之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。屏東教育大學,屏東。
李乙明(譯)(2012):資優學生的特質。載於潘裕豐(總校閱),資優教育概論(2-1-2-22頁)。(原作者:G. A. Davis, & S. B. Rimm, & D. Siegle)。臺北市,華騰。(原著出版年,2010)
邱文彬、林美珍(1999):大學生邁向成熟的同儕人際關係:容忍性、同
理心發展之性別與年級差異的探討。教育與心理研究,22(1),161-193。
林妙華(2003):資優生過度激動特質與友伴關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
花敬凱(譯)(2007):啟迪資優。(原作者:B. Clark)。臺北市,心理。(原著出版年,2002)
教育部(2012):身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法。中華民國教育部,臺北市。
許永芳(2002):國小學童同理心發展及其相關因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
張馨仁(2001):資優生過度激動特質之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。
張馨仁(2011):過度激動特質對於資優生與普通生學習表現、創造力及心理適應之預測研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。
張玉佩(2003):台灣北區高中數理資優班學生情緒發展層次與情緒適應之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。
張玉佩、潘裕豐(2008):國小美術資優生與普通生過度激動特質與創造力之相關研究。資優教育研究,8(1),67-89.
許仁榮(2005):高中數理資優學生「高自我期許」的非理性觀念與輔導策略。資優教育季刊,57,21-24。
許珮琦、曾筱育、鄭書勤(2013):從現今學校輔導工作看同理心教育。家庭教育雙月刊,42,84-90。
陳昭儀(2000a):傑出理化科學家之人格特質及創新歷程之研究。師大學報,45(1)(科學教育類),27-45。
陳昭儀(2000b):傑出表演藝術家個人特質之研究。資優教育研究,1(2),1-28。
陳昭儀(2003):傑出科學家及藝術家之比對研究。教育與心理研究,26(2),199-225。
張正芬(2003):「Autism Spectrum Disorder」對台灣特殊教育的影響。載於國立台灣師範大學特殊教育系編:「2003特殊教育學術研討會」會議手冊。臺北:國立台灣師範大學特殊教育系。
郭靜姿、張馨仁、張玉佩、周坤賢、林燁虹、陳雪君、林慶波(2012):數理優異學生心理特質與大腦結構之研究。教育心理學報,43(4),805-832。
黃珮琇(2005):國中資優生過度激動特質與創造力之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
黃文慧(2002):雙重特殊學生(2E)的研究沿流、特質與鑑定之啟示。資優教育季刊,83,10-20。
楊蕢芬(2006):自閉症學生之教育。臺北市,心理。
蔡麗婉(2006):國小資優生生活適應影響因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北。
劉萌容(2009):青春少年行~認識與支持亞斯伯格症學生。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育中心,高雄市。
劉萌容(2008):「自閉症光譜量表」-Autism Spectrum Quotient中文成人版之預測效度及相關因素分析。特殊教育研究學刊,33(1),73-92。
劉瓊瑛(譯)(2009):亞斯伯格症進階完整版<<寫給家長、患者和專業人員的完全手冊>>。(原作者:Tony Attwood)。臺北,久周。
盧佳嘉(2007) :社交技巧訓練方案提升國小兒童社交技巧與社會自尊效果之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
謝燕珠(2005):國中音樂資優班學生過度激動特質與社會情意適應之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
魏俊陽(2008):國小美術資優班學生過度激動特質與創造力之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
二、西文部分:
Ackerman, C.M. (1997a). A secondary analysis of research using the Overexcitability Questionnaire. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station.
Ackerman, C.M. (1997b). Identifying gifted adolescents using personality characteristics: Dabrowski's Overexcitabilities. Roeper Review, 19(4), 229-236.
Amend, E. R., Schuller, P. Beaver-Gavin, K., & Beights, R. (2009). A unique challenge: Sorting out the differences between giftedness and Asperger's disorder. Gifted Child Today, 32(4), 57-63.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
Bailey, C. L. (2010). Overexcitabilities and sensitivities: Implications of Drawski’s Theory of Positive Disintegration for counseling the gifted. Retrieved from http://counselingoutfitters.com/vistas/vistas10/Article_10.pdf
Baker, A. E., Lane, A., Angley, M. T., & Young, R. L. (2007). The relationship between sensory processing patterns and behavioural responsiveness in autistic disorder: A pilot study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,38, 867-875.
Baranek, G. T. (1999). Autism during infancy: A retrospective video analysis of sensory-motor and social behaviors at 9-12 months of age. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 213-224.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trend in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 248-254.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2008). Autism, hypersystemizing, and truth. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 64-75.
Baron-Cohen, S., Ashwin, E., Ashwin, C., Tavassoli,T., & Chakrabrti, B. (2009). Talent in autism:Hyper-systemizing, hyper-attention to detail and sensory hypersitivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society,364, 1377-1383.
Baron-Cohen, S., Bolton, P., Wheelwright, S. Scahill, V., Short, L., Mead, G., & Smith, A. (1998). Does autism occur more often in families of physicists, engineers, and mathematicians? Autism, 2 ,296-301.
Baron-Cohen, S., Richler, J., Bisatya, D., Gurunathan, N., Wheelwright, S. (2003). The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B [special issue], 358, 361-374.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Burtenshaw, A., & Hobson, E. (2007). Mathematical talent is linked to autism. Human Nature, 18(2), 125-131.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S.,Lawson, J., Griffin,R., Ashwin, C., Billington, J., & Chakrabarti, B.(2005). Empathizing and systemizing in autism spectrum conditions. In F. R. Volkmar., R. Paul., A. Klin,. & D. Cohen. (Eds), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ,pp. 628-639). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Stott, C., Bolton, P., & Goodyer, I. (1997). Is there a link between engineering and autism? Autism, 1, 153-163.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The Autism-Spectrum Quotient(AQ) : Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5-17.
Ben-Sasson, A., Hen, L., Fluss, R., Cermak, S. A., Engel-Yeger, B., & Gal, E. (2009). A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1-11.
Bouchard, L. L. (2004). An instrument for the measure of Dabrowskian Overexcitabilities to identify gifted elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(4), 339-350.
Boucher, J. (2009). The Autistic Spectrum: Characteristics, causes and practical Issues. London, UK: SAGE.
Bouchert, N., & Falk, R. F. (2001). The relationship among giftedness, gender, and overexcitability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(4), 260-267.
Bregman, J. D. (2005). Definitions and characteristics of the spectrum. In D. Zager (Ed.), Autism spectrum disorders. Identification, education and treatment. (3rd ed., pp. 3 – 46).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Burger-Veltmeijer, A. E. J., Minnaert, A. E. M. G., Houten-Van, Van., & den Bosch, E. J. (2011). Review: The co-occurrence of intellectual giftedness and Autism spectrum disorder. Educational Research Review, 6(1), 67–88.
Cash, A. B. (1999). A Profile of gifted individuals with Autism: The twice-exceptional learner. Roeper Review, 22(1), 22–27.
Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston: Little, Browm.
Dabrowski, K. (1972). Psychoneurosis is not an illness. London, England: Gryf Publications.
Dabrowski, K. (1996). Multilevelness of emotional and instinctive fuction. Lublin, Polska: Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego.
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talent. Needgam, MA: Alley and Bacon.
Dennis, M., Lazenby, A. L., & Lockyer, L. (2001). Inferential language in high-function children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 47–54.
Donnelly, J. A., & Altman, R. (1994). The autistic savant : Recognizing and serving the gifted student with autism. Roeper Review, 16(4), 252–256.
Falk, R. F., Manzanero, J. B., & Miller, N. B. (1997). Developmental potential in venezuelan and American artists: A cross-cultural validity study. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2-3), 201-206.
Falk, R. F., Piechowki, M. M., & Lind, S. (1994). Critiria for rating the intensity of excitabilities. Unpublished manuscript, University of Akron, Northland College, Ashland,WI: Lind Consulting, Kent, WA.
Filipplli, L. A. & Walberg, H. J. (1997). Childhood traits and conditions of eminent women scientists. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(3),95-103.
Fitzgerald, M. (2005). The genesis of artistic creativity: Asperger’s syndrome and the arts. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Fournier, K.A., Hass, C.J., Naik, S.K., Lodha, N., Cauraugh, J.H. (2010). Motor coordination in autism spectrum disorders: A synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,ˋ40(10) , 1227-1240.
Frith, U. (1991). Autism and Asperger’s syndrome. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press.
Gallagher, S. A.(1986). A comparison of the concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth‐grade students. Roeper Review, 8(2), 115-119.
Gallagher, S. A. & Gallagher, J. J. (2002). Giftedness and Asperger's syndrome: A new agenda for education, Understanding Our Gifted, 14(2), 1-9.
Grandin, T. (1992). An inside view of autism. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds), High-functioning individuals with autism. New York: Plenum Press, 105–26.
Greenspan, S. I., & Weider, S. (1997). Developmental patterns and outcomes in infants and children with disorders relating and communicating: A chart review of 200 cases of children with autistic spectrum diagnoses. Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 1, 87–142.
Gross, C. M., Rinn, A. N., & Jamieson, K. M. (2006). Gifted adolescents’ overexcitabilities and self‐concepts: An analysis of gender and grade level. Roeper Review, 29(4), 240-248.
Harrison, G. E. & Haneghan, J. P. V. (2011). The gifted and the shadow of the night: Dabrowski’s overexcitabilities and their correlation to insomnia, death anxiety, and fear of the unknown. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(4), 669-697.
Hazell, C. G. (1984). Experienced levels of emptiness and existential concern with different levels of emotional development and profile of value. Psychological Reports, 55(3), 967-976.
Henderson, L. M. (2001). Asperger’s syndrome in gifted individuals. Gifted Child Today, 24(3), 28-25.
Lewis, R. B. & Kitano, M. K. (1992). Psychological intensities in gifted adults. Roeper Review,15(1), 25-31.
Little, C. (2002). Which is it? Asperger’s syndrome or giftedness? Defining the difference. Gifted Child Today, 25( 1). 58-63.
Lovecky, D. V. (1993). The quest for meaning : Counseling issues with gifted children and adolescents. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted & talented. (pp. 29-50). Denver, Colorado: Love Publishing.
Myles, B. S., & Simpson, R. L. (2003). Asperger syndrome. A guide for educatiors and parents. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Mendaglio, S. (2012). Overexcitabilities and giftedness research: A call for a paradigm shift. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,35(3), 207-219
Mendaglio, S. & Tillier, W. (2006). Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration and giftedness:Overexcitability research findings. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(1), 68-87.
Miller, N. B., Silverman, L. K., & Falk, R. F. (1994). Emotional development, intellectual ability, and gender. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,18(1), 20-38.
Neihart, M. (2000). Gifted children with Asperger's syndrome. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(4), 222-230.
Nicpon, M. F., Allmon, A., Sieck, B., & Stinson, R. D. (2011). Empirical investigation of twice-exceptionality: Where have we been and where are we going? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 3-17.
Ornitz, E.M. (1976). The modulation of sensory input and motor output in autistic children. In E. Schopler & R.J. Reichler (Eds.), Psychopathology and child development: Research and treatment (pp. 115–135). New York: Plenum Press.
Piechowski, M. M. (1975). A theoretical and empirical approach to the study of development. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 92, 231-297.
Piechowski, M. M. (2003). From William James to Maslow and Dabrowski: Excitability of character and self-actualization. In D. Ambrose, L. M. Cohen, & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Creative intelligence toward theoretic integration. New Jersey, NJ: Hampton Press.
Piechowski, M. M. & Colangelo, N. (1984). Developmental and potential. Gifted Child Quarterly. 28 (2), 80-88.
Piechowski, M. M. & Miller, N. B. (1995). Assessing developmental potential in gifted children: A comparison of methods. Roeper Review, 17(3), 176-180.
Piechowski, M. M., Silverman, L. K., Cunningham, K., & Falk, R. F. (1982, March). A comparison of intellectually gifted and artists on five dimensions of mental functioning. Symposium conducted at the meeting of American Education Research Association, New York, USA.
Piechowski, M. M., Silverman, L. K., & Falk, R. F. (1985). Comparison of intellectually and artistically gifted on five dimensions of mental functioning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 539-549.
Piirto, J. & Fraas, J. (2012). A mixed-methods comparison of vocational and identified-gifted high school students on the Overexcitability Questionnaire. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(1), 3-34.
Powell, P. M. & Haden, T. (1984). The intellectual and psychsocial nature of extreme giftedness. Roeper Review, 6 (3), 131-133
Rinn, A. N., Mendaglio, S., Rudasill, K. M., & McQueen, K. S. (2012). Examining the relationship between the overexcitabilities and self- concepts of adolescents via multivariate cluster analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(1), 3-17.
Schiever, S. W. (1985). Creative personality characteristics and dimensions of mental functioning in gifted adolescents. Roeper Review, 7(4), 223-226.
Silverman, L. K. (1993). The gifted individual. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted & talented.(pp 3-28). Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
Simmons, D. R., Robertson, A. E., McKay, L. S., Toal, E., Mcaleer, P., & Pollick, F. E. (2009). Vision in autism spectrum disorders. Vision Research, 49,2705-2739.
Szatmari. P. (2011). What are ASC? In S. Botle & J. Hallmayer (Eds.), Autism spectrum conditions:FAQs on autism, Asperger syndrome, and atypical autism answered by international experts (pp 3-7). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe Publishing.
Szatmari. P. (2011). What are the most common characteristics of ASC? In S. Botle & J. Hallmayer (Eds.), Autism spectrum conditions:FAQs on autism, Asperger syndrome, and atypical autism answered by international experts. (pp 8-11). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe Publishing.
Tieso, C. L. (2007a). Patterns of Overexcitabilities in identified gifted students and their parents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 5 (1), 11-22.

Tieso, C. L. (2007b). Overexcitabilities: A new way to think about talent? Roeper Review, 29(4), 232-239.
Tomchek, S. D., & Dunn, W. (2007). Sensory processing in children with and without autism: A comparative study using the Short Sensory Profile. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(2), 190–200.
Treat, A. R. (2006). Overexcitability in gifted sexually diverse opulations. Journal of Advanced Academics, 17(4), 244-257.
Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, B., Wheelwright, S., & Yoshikuni, T. (2006). The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in Japan: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Autism and Development Disorders, 36(2), 263-270.
Walberg, H. J. (1969). A portrait of the artist and scientist as young men. Exceptional Children, 36(1), 5-11.
Walberg, H. J., Tasi, S. L., Weinstein, T., Gabriel, C. L., Rasher, S. P., Rosecrans, T., Rovai, E. Ide, J., Trujillo, M., & Vukosavich, P. (1981). Childhood traits and environmental conditions of highly eminent adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25(3), 103-107.
Wheelwright, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Goldenfeld, N., Delaney, J., Fine, D., Smith, R., Weil, L., & Wakabayshi, A. (2006). Predicting Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) from the Systemizing Quotient-Revised (SQ-R) and Empathy Quotient (EQ). Brain Research, 1079(1), 47-56.
Wing, L. (1988). The continuum of autistic characteristics. In E. Schopler & G. M. Mesibov (Eds.), Diagnosis and assessment in autism (pp. 91-107). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Wirthwein, L. & Rost, D. H. (2011). Focussing on overexcitabilities: Studies with gifted and academically talented adults. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 337-342.
Yakmaci-Guzel, B. & Akarsu, F. (2006). Comparing overexcitabilities of gifted and non‐gifted 10th grade students in Turkey. High Ability Studies, 17(1), 43-56.

下載圖示
QR CODE