本研究藉由創作《霧詩》提出科技反思，未來人們日常生活中將存在更多互動科技，它們必須被謹慎地編織進城市的脈絡，契合城市的日常實踐，而非強行覆蓋於城市之上。時間能創造取代性的技術，卻不能解決其衍生的社會性問題；本研究運用社會性的探索方法，從捷運車廂空間探測（MRT Probes）捕捉空間中存在的互動現象，以工作坊的方式討論既存的城市公共空間互動設計案例與介入捷運空間之事件，探索互動設計介入捷運車廂空間應考量的各種面向，最後產出對設計創作具有指引性的註記履歷（Annotated portfolio）。
研究最後整理出三項重點：(1)運用日常生活物與承擔性（affordance）作為輸入（input）能減輕注意力負擔，讓人以自然的行為操作而毋需學習新的介面，具有開創有意義之互動形式的潛力。(2)遊玩（Play）讓人在愉悅的情境中探索，相較於遊戲（Gameplay）更契合日常實踐；涉入（Involvement）的體驗比全神貫注的投入（Engagement）更適合捷運車廂空間。(3)表演性（Performativity）是一種可操作的資源，受近期探索城市相關互動設計的學者支持，實際上卻仍是相當模糊的概念；本研究主張應從知覺交錯（Perceptual crossing）的角度理解，當人們共享著空間情境，那些滲透在物理活動與知覺意識之間「看不見的」感知交會與社交互動，比「看得見的」更具影響力。

Most recent researches on urban computing focuses its efforts on solving problems, however, as more interactions move beyond the desktop into every aspect of our daily lives, an alternative emphasis is how technology could be woven into daily practice to reflect our lived world. The goal of this paper concerns how we experience the world around us, drawing on existing discursive design approaches to address experiential quality, reflection values rather than instrumental purpose. I describe my research on how to design for urban lived experience to invigorate more thought about urban life, and chose to focus on one iconic urban place of mobility, Taipei MRT carriage, which include complex urban context and social interaction phenomena, not only shaped our own formulation of daily experience also of identity, community, and self.
In this paper, the approach which I call MRT probes is a new tool for exploratory way of spatial behavior study, exploit methods of deep observation coupled with passengers’ traveling diaries and photos by mobile phone to elicit inspirational responses —not comprehensive information about themselves lives, but fragmentary clues about how they thought about others. The results of that show several social interaction phenomena in Taipei MRT carriage coincided with Goffman’s Dramaturgy Theory—every human action in public has a performative aspect. Building on the assumption that performativity is a resource for designing urban interactive artifacts that might have been helpful in bettering to understand social relationship and addressing under-constrained problems, I conducted a one-day workshop that involving few case studies of urban intervention and performativity, through a series of approaches above to generate an annotated portfolio.
I present MISTPOEMS as a specific example to reframe the question about how to create meaningful experience in our daily routine. It gained a strong foothold on the phenomenology of perception and embodied interaction. I conclude with describing several design notions important for designing for MRT carriage: (1) Rather than create new devices, using an everyday-object-input as a form of a non-traditional user interface can easily connection interactive behavior with meaningful situation intuitively. (2) In mobility contexts, designing an engagement artifact, like gameplay, might over consume people’s attention. On the contrary, play is not just mindless entertainment, but an essential way of involving with surrounding and learning about real world. (3) Researchers should take performativity from an phenomenological perspective, while people share with the same space that dominating their perception, the invisible interactions include rich interleaving physical activities and awareness with abstract thoughts, rituals and social interactions were more important than those visible. I suggest the design approach in this paper in terms of conceptual themes might be generalizable to other interaction designs, especially the work in underground, elevator, sidewalk, pedestrian crossing, etc.

中文文獻
Benyon, D., Turner, P., & Turner, S.（2005）。人機介面：互動式系統設計(最新修訂版)（郭學武譯）。臺北：台灣培生教育出版。
Brown, J. S.（2000）。資訊革命了什麼？（顧淑馨譯）。臺北：先覺出版社。
de Certeau（1998）。日常生活實踐—實踐的藝術（方琳琳、黃春柳譯）。南京：南京大學出版社。
Goffman, E.（1959）。日常生活中的自我表演（徐江敏、李姚軍譯）。臺北：桂冠圖書。
Gershenfeld, N.（1999）。當鞋子開始思考（王昱海譯）。臺北：天下文化。
Grout, C.（2001）。藝術介入空間：都會裡的藝術創作（姚孟吟譯）。臺北：遠流。
Hanington, B., & Martin, B.（2012）。設計的方法：100個分析難題，跟成功商品取經，讓設計更棒、更好的有效方法（趙慧芬、林潔盈、吳莉君譯）。臺北：原點。
Massey, D., Allen, J., & Pryke, M.（1999）。騷動的城市：移動 / 定著（王志弘譯），臺北：群學出版。
McQuire, S.（2008）。媒介城市：媒介、建築與都市空間（趙偉妏譯）。韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。
Mitchell, W. J. （1995）。建築的設計思考 : 設計、運算、與認知（劉育東譯）。胡氏圖書。
Negroponte, N.（1995）。數位革命（齊若蘭譯）。臺北：天下文化。
Norman, D. A. （2000）。設計心理學（The psychology of everyday things）（卓耀宗譯）。臺北 : 遠流。（原作1989年出版）
Norman, D. A.（2004）。情感設計：我們為何喜歡（或討厭）日常用品（翁鵲嵐、鄭玉屏、張志傑譯）。臺北：田園城市。
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H.（2003）。互動設計：跨越人－電腦互動（陳建雄譯）。臺北：全華科技圖書有限公司。
Rapoport, A.（1996）。建築環境的意義—非語言的交流途徑（施植明譯）。臺北：田園城市。（原作1982年出版）
Ritchie, J. & Lewis, J.（2003）。質性研究方法（藍毓仁譯）。臺北：巨流圖書。
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W.（2003）。實體世界的語言（呂亦欣譯）。臺北：韋伯文化（原作2005出版）
Sennett, R.（1977）。再會吧！公共人（萬毓澤譯）。臺北：國立編譯館。
Zeisel, J.（1981）。研究與設計—環境行為研究的工具（關華山譯）。臺北：田園城市。
王志弘（1993）。城市、文化與歷史—閱讀《看不見的城市》，收錄於看不見的城市（王志弘譯）。時報出版。頁12。
王志弘（2002）。流動地景與時空操演—臺北捷運系統與新都市經驗。地理學報，31，83-115。
安藤忠雄（1992）。安藤忠雄的都市彷徨（謝宗哲譯）。臺北：田園城市。
邱德亮（2001）。維希留加速2000年（ Paul Virilioaccelerel'an 2000 ），收錄於消失的美學（楊凱麟譯），揚智文化出版社，頁1-60。
段義孚（1977）。經驗透視中的空間和地方（潘桂成譯）。臺北：國立編譯館。
徐磊青、楊功俠（2005）。環境心理學：環境、知覺和行為。臺北：五南圖書。
陳真安（2005）。監視與身體流動：台北捷運空間之研究。未出版之碩士論文。東吳大學社會學系碩士班論文。臺北。
游曉貞、陳國祥、邱上嘉（2006）。直接知覺論在產品設計應用之審視。設計學報，11( 3)，13-27。
楊子葆（2004）。世界經典捷運建築。臺北：木馬文化。
管倖生等人編著（2006）。設計研究方法。（第八章訪談法/ 阮綠茵著）。臺北：全華圖書。

英文文獻
Arnall, T., & Martinussen, E. (2010). Depth of Field: Discursive design research through film. FORMakademisk, 3(1), 100-122.
Arnall, T., & Martinussen, E. (2010). Depth of Field: Discursive design research through film. FORMakademisk, 3(1), 100-122.
Bannon, L., J. (1991). From human factors to human actors: the role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in system design. In Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (Eds.), Design at work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems (pp. 25-44). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Barthes, R. (1986).“Semiology and the urban.” In M. Gottdiener and Alexandros Ph. Lagopoulos (Eds.), The City and the Sign: An Introduction to Urban Semiotics (pp. 87-98). New York: Columbia University Press.
Bassoli, A., Brewer, J., Martin, K., Dourish, P., Mainwaring, S. (2007). Underground Aesthetics: Rethinking Urban Computing, IEEE Pervasive Computing, 6(3), 39–45.
Bassoli, A., Brewer, J., Martin, K., Dourish, P., Mainwaring, S. (2007). Underground Aesthetics: Rethinking Urban Computing, IEEE Pervasive Computing, 6(3), 39–45.
Bødker, S. (2006). When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles (pp. 1-8). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Bowers, J. (2012). The logic of annotated portfolios: Communicating the value of ‘research through design.’ In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 68-77). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Bruner, J. (1973). Beyond The Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing. New York, NY: Norton.
Dalsgaard, P., & Halskov, K. (2010). Designing Urban Media Façades: Cases and Challenges. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2277-2286). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Deckers, E., Wensveen, S., Ahn, R. & Overbeeke, K. (2011). Designing for Perceptual Crossing to Improve User Involvement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1929-1938). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Deckers, E., Wensveen, S., Ahn, R., & Overbeeke, K. (2011). Designing for Perceptual Crossing to Improve User Involvement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing System (pp. 1929-1938). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as Experience. New York, NY: Minton Balch.
Dourish, P. (2001). Seeking a Foundation for Context-Aware Computing. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2), 229-241.
Dourish, P. (2006). Re-Space-ing Place: Place and Space Ten Years On. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 299-308). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Dourish, P.(2004). Reflective HCI: Towards a Critical Technical Practice. In Proceedings of
Fischer, P. T. (2011). Urban HCI: interaction patterns in the built environment. In Proceedings of the 25th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 531-534). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Fischer, P. T. (2011). Urban HCI: interaction patterns in the built environment. In Proceedings of the 25th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 531-534). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Fischer, P. T., ＆ Hornecker, E. (2012). Urban HCI: spatial aspects in the design of shared encounters for media facades. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 307-316). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Fischer, P. T., ＆ Hornecker, E. (2012). Urban HCI: spatial aspects in the design of shared encounters for media facades. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 307-316). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Forlizzi, J., & Battarbee, K. (2004). Understanding experience in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 261-267). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Gaver, B., & Bowers, J. (2012). Annotated portfolios. interactions 19(4), 40-49.
Gaver, B., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., & Walker, B. (2004). Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions, 11(5), 53-56.
Gaver, B., Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21-29.
Gaver, W. (2002). Designing for Homo Ludens. i3 Magazine, 12, 2-5.
Gaver, W., Beaver, J., & Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 233-240). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Gibson, J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Golem (2012). Un abri bus qui vous transporte à bord de la Škoda Citigo. Retrieved from: http://golem13.fr/un-abri-bus-qui-vous-transporte-a-bord-de-la-skoda-citigo/
Hallnäs, L., & Redström, J. (2001). Slow Technology- Designing for Reflection. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5(3), 201-212. London: Springer.
Halskov, K., & Nielsen, R. (2006). Virtual video prototyping. Human-Computer Interaction, 21(2), 199-233.
Halskov, K., & Nielsen, R. (2006). Virtual video prototyping. Human-Computer Interaction, 21(2), 199-233.
Halskov, K., & Nielsen, R. (2006). Virtual video prototyping. Human-Computer Interaction, 21(2), 199-233.
Harrison, S., Sengers, P., & Tatar, D. (2008). The Three Paradigms of HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (in press).
Hassenzahl, M. (2011). User Experience and Experience Design. In Soegaard, M., & Dam, R., F. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Online at http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/user_experience_and_experience_design.html
Her, J. (2013). An analytical framework for facilitating interactivity between participants and interactive artwork: case studies in MRT stations. Digital Creativity. doi: 10.1080/14626268.2013.776974
Hobye, M., & Löwgren, J. (2011). Touching a stranger: Designing for engaging experience in embodied interaction. International Journal of Design, 5(3), 31-48.
Hulkko, S., Mattelmäki, T., Virtanen, K., & Keinonen, T. (2004). Mobile Probes. In Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction (pp. 43-51). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Hummels, C. (2012). Matter of Transformation - Sculpting a Valuable Tomorrow. Inaugural speech, 28th September 2012, TU/e. Online at: http://dqi.id.tue.nl/
Jung, H., & Stolterman, E. (2011). Form and materiality in interaction design: a new approach to HCI. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 399-408). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Klooster, S., & Overbeeke, C., J. (2005). Designing products as an integral part of choreography of interaction: The product’s form as an integral part of movement. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement (pp. 23-35). Newcastle, UK: Northumbria University.
Legard, R., Keegan, J., ＆Ward, K. (2003). In-depth interview. In Ritchie, J., ＆ Lewise, J. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 138-169). London: SAGE Publications.
Light, A. (2006). Adding method to meaning: A technique for exploring peoples' experience with technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 175-187.
Lofland, L. (1973). A World of Strangers: Order and Action in Urban Public Space. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Loke, L., & Robertson, T. (2010). Studies of dancers: Moving from experience to interaction design. International Journal of Design, 4(2), 39-54.
Lozano-hemmer, R. (2013, May 8). Body Movie. Retrieved from: http://www.lozano-hemmer.com/body_movies.php
Mainwaring, S., Anderson, K., & Chang, M. (2005). Living for the Global City: Mobile Kits, Urban Interfaces, and Ubicomp. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 269-286). Berlin: Springer.
Markussen, T. (2012). The disruptive aesthetics of hijacking urban space. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture. doi: 10.3402/jac.v4i0.18157
Markussen, T. (2013). The Disruptive Aesthetics of Design Activism: Enacting Design Between Art and Politics. Design Issue, 29(1), 38-50.
McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
McCullough , M. (2012). On Attention to Surroundings. Interactions, 19(6), 40-49.
McCullough, M. (2004). Digital ground: Architecture, pervasive computing, and environmental knowing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In Nardi, B., A. (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103.
O’Hara, K., Glancy, M., & Robertshaw, S. (2008). Understanding collective play in an urban screen game. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 67-76). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Ourit Ben-Haim (2003, May 8). The Underground New York Public Library. Retrieved from: http://undergroundnewyorkpubliclibrary.com/
Palen, L., & Dourish, P. (2003). Unpacking "Privacy" for a Networked World. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 129-136). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Paulos, E., & Jenkins, T. (2005). Urban Probes: Encountering Our Emerging Urban Atmospheres. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 341-350). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Picard, Ｒ. (1997). Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Quartier des spectacles. (2013, May 8). 21 BALANÇOIRES, A MUSICAL COLLABORATION FROM ANDRAOS & MONGIAT, AT THE PROMENADE DES ARTISTES. Retrieved from: http://www.quartierdesspectacles.com/en/2011/04/21-balancoires-a-musical-collaboration-from-andraos-mongiat-at-the-promenade-des-artistes/
Rittel, H., Webber, M., (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4(2), 155-169.
Ross, P., & Wensveen, S. (2010). Designing aesthetics of behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design. International Journal of Design, 4(2), 3-13.
Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., & Kaye, J., J. (2005) Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility (pp. 49–58). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., & Kaye, J., J. (2005) Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility (pp. 49–58). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Smyth, M., & Helgason, I. (2010). Imagining urban interactions: strategies for exploring future design landscapes. In Proceedings of the 25th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 41-45). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Suchman, L., A., (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tharp, B., & Tharp, S. (2011). Discoursive Design: Beyond Purely Commercial Notions of Industrial and Product Design. Online at: http://www.idsa.org/sites/default/files/Discursive%20Design.pdf
Tharp, B., & Tharp, S. (2011). Discoursive Design: Beyond Purely Commercial Notions of Industrial and Product Design. Online at: http://www.idsa.org/sites/default/files/Discursive%20Design.pdf
the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.1727-1728). New
Toprak, C., Joshua, P., Ho, H., & Mueller, F. (2013). Cart-Load-O-Fun: Designing Digital Games for Trams. In Proceedings of CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2877-2878). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Weiser, M., & Brown, J., S. (1996). Designing Calm Technology. PowerGrid Journal, 1(1). Online at: http://www.powergrid.com/1.01/calmtech.html
Weiser, M., & Brown, J., S. (1996). Designing Calm Technology. PowerGrid Journal, 1(1). Online at: http://www.powergrid.com/1.01/calmtech.html
Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A newfoundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Wright, P., McCarthy, J. (2008). Empathy and Experience in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 637-646). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Yahoo! (2011). What is a “Bus Stop Derby”? Retrieved from: http://www.busstopderby.com/
Ylirisku, S., & Buur, J. (2007). Designing with video. London: Springer.
Ylirisku, S., Halttunen, V., Nuojua, J., & Juustila, A. (2009). Framing design in the third paradigm. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1131-1140). New York, NY: ACM Press.
York, NY: ACM Press.

網路資料
張玉音（2012）。後公共藝術。今藝術233期。取自：http://mag.chinatimes.com/mag-cnt.aspx?artid=12171&page=3
麻省理工學院媒體藝術與科學系列課程（MIT Ｍedia Lab ：Media Arts and Sciences）（2001）。麻省理工學院「開放式課程網頁」，上網日期：2011年11月，網址：http://www.myoops.org/twocw/mit/Media-Arts-and-Sciences/index.htm
謝明玲（2011）。你被智慧型手機綁架了嗎？ 天下雜誌，479期。取自： http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5026292&page=3