研究生: |
許昕媛 Hsu, Hsin-Yuan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
以層級結構為本的漢語結果複合動詞動貌分析 An Aspectual Analysis of Resultative Verb Compounds in Mandarin Chinese: A Scale-Based Approach |
指導教授: |
李臻儀
Li, Jen-I |
口試委員: |
李臻儀
Li, Jen-I 陳正賢 Chen, Cheng-Hsien 許展嘉 Hsu, Chan-Chia |
口試日期: | 2022/07/25 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
英語學系 Department of English |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 105 |
中文關鍵詞: | 結果複合動詞 、層級結構 、動貌 、漢語 |
英文關鍵詞: | resultative verb compounds (RVCs), scale structure, aspect, Mandarin Chinese |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200933 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:85 下載:15 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在以層級結構分析漢語中結果複合動詞(Resultative verb compounds, RVCs)的動貌。結果複合動詞是由兩個元素組成的複合詞。根據Li & Thompson (1989)的研究,漢語結果複合動詞的第一個組成元素(V1)通常為表示動作或狀態的動詞,第二個組成元素(V2)則表示該動作的結果。以往的研究對結果複合動詞的動貌分類有不同的看法。Tai(1984)指出,由於漢語結果複合動詞無法與進行貌(progressive aspect)同時出現,因此需歸類為達成動詞(achievements)。然而,Smith(1997)認為結果複合動詞與完成動詞(accomplishments)更類似,因為 V1所傳達的動作過程不能與V2傳達的動作結果分開。同時,大多數文獻也未能合理分析程度達成動詞(degree achievement verbs, DA verbs)。程度達成動詞為一種表達狀態變化的動詞,在漢語中經常以結果複合動詞的形式出現。為了解決程度達成動詞的分類問題,Hay et al.(1999) 提出了層級結構,而該方法也為Peck et al.(2013)所採用來針對漢語動詞進行動貌分類,其中也包含結果複合動詞。然而,儘管層級結構已被Peck et al. 證明能夠辨識出漢語中的程度達成動詞,他們對結果複合動詞的分析仍存在一些不足之處。因此,本論文利用層級結構來研究結果複合動詞,並詳細分析結果複合動詞補語的層級特性。
本研究指出,根據結果複合動詞補語(即V2)的有界性和持續性,漢語結果複合動詞的動貌可依層級結構分為五類:開放結果複合動詞(open-scale RVC)、下封閉結果複合動詞(lower-closed-scale RVC)、上封閉結果複合動詞(upper-closed-scale RVC)、完全封閉結果複合動詞(totally-closed-scale RVC)和兩點封閉結果複合動詞(two-point closed-scale RVC)。它們的層級屬性可以從進行貌標誌「正在」、否定蘊涵測驗、程度型問句(how-questions)以及與層級相關的修飾語,如「很」和「完全」中觀察到。分析結果也顯示,結果複合動詞中存在著內部差異,因此需要將它們分類並個別對待。
The present study aims to analyze the aspectual properties of resultative verb compounds (hereafter RVCs) in Mandarin Chinese based on the scale structure. A resultative verb compound is a verbal compound composed of two components. The first component (V1) is usually a verb indicating an action or a state, and the second component (V2) normally signals some result of the action or process denoted by the first element (Li & Thompson 1989: 54-55).
Previous studies have different opinions about the aspectual classification of RVCs. Tai (1984) states that as Mandarin RVCs are incompatible with the progressive aspect, RVCs are more comparable to achievements. However, Smith (1997: 288) suggests that RVCs share more similarities with accomplishments, as the process denoted by V1 cannot be detached from the outcome expressed by V2. Moreover, most literature fails to account for the degree achievement (hereafter DA) verbs as well, which is a type of verb that does not necessarily involve a natural endpoint but indicates a change (Hay et al. 1999) and often appears in the form of RVC. To cope with the problem of DA verbs, Hay et al. propose the scale structure, and this approach is applied by Peck et al. (2013) to classify Mandarin verbs, including RVCs. Although the scale structure enables Peck et al. to identify DA verbs in Mandarin, their analysis on RVCs still has some inadequacies. Therefore, this present study aims to fill the research gap by adopting the scale structure to analyze RVCs, putting great focus on the scalar properties of the resultative complements.
This study proposes that Mandarin RVCs can be aspectually categorized into five sub-classes based on the boundedness and the punctuality of the resultative complements (i.e., V2): open-scale RVCs, lower-closed-scale RVCs, upper-closed-scale RVCs, totally-closed-scale RVCs, and two-point closed-scale RVCs. The analysis shows that their scalar attributes are observable from the use of the progressive marker zhengzai, the negation entailment test, how-questions, scale-related modifier hen ‘very’, and wanquan ‘completely’. The analysis demonstrates that there are internal differences within RVCs, and it is not appropriate to treat them as a single aspectual class.
Basciano, Bianca. 2010. Verbal Compounding and Causativity in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Verona, Verona.
Basciano, Bianca. 2019. On the event structure of Chinese resultative compounds. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 48:173-241. https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-04802002
Beavers, John. 2008. Scalar complexity and the structure of events. Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, ed. by Dölling Johannes, Heyde-Zybatow Tatjana, & Schäfer Martin, 245-266. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/9783110925449.245
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, Finegan, Edward, and Quirk, Randolph. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, vol. 2. London: Longman.
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chief, Lian-Cheng. 2008. Scalarity and Incomplete Event Descriptions in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo.
Civardi, Eugenio and Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2015. The semantics of degree verbs and the telicity issue. Borealis–An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 4.1:57-77.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deng, Shou-Hsin. 2005. Verb classification and its pedagogical extension. Studies on Modern Chinese Syntax, ed. by Shou-Hsin Deng, 79-86. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
Dippner, Kevin. 2010. Metaphorical Use of Mandarin Compound Directional Complements. MA thesis, Ohio University, Athens.
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing.
Filip, Hana. 2012. Lexical aspect. The Oxford Handook of Tense and Aspect, ed. by Robert I Binnick, 721-751. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gao, Zhao-Ming, Huang, Chu-Ren, and Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 1993. On the syntactic structure of evaluative V-qilai construction in Chinese. Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Formal and Computational Linguistics, ed. by Chu-Ren Huang, Claire Hsun-hui Chang, Keh-jiann Chen, & Cheng-Hui Liu, 107-121. Hsinchu: Computational Linguistics Society of R.O.C.
Garey, Howard B. 1957. Verbal aspect in French. Language 33.2:91-110.
Hay, Jennifer. 1998. The non-uniformity of degree achievements. Paper presented to 72nd Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America, ed. by Linguistics Society of America. New York: Linguistics Society of America.
Hay, Jennifer, Kennedy, Christopher, and Levin, Beth. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements”. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9:127-144. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v0i0.2833
He, Bao-zhang. 1992. Situation Types and Aspectual Classes of Verbs in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Henriëtte De, Swart. 1998. Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16.2:347-385. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4047954
Huang, Su-miao and Hsieh, Shelley Ching-yu. 2008. Grammaticalization of directional complements in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics 9.1:49-68.
Kang, Jian. 2001. Perfective aspect particles or telic aktionsart markers? --- Studies of the directional verb compounds. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 29.2:281-339. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23754063
Kearns, Kate. 2000. Semantics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Kearns, Kate. 2011. Semantics (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kennedy, Christopher. 2001. Polar opposition and the ontology of ‘degrees’. Linguistics and Philosophy 24.1:33-70.
Kennedy, Christopher. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30.1:1-45.
Kennedy, Christopher and Levin, Beth. 2008. Measure of change: The adjectival core of verbs of variable telicity. Adjectives and Adverbs in Semantics and Discourse, ed. by Louise McNally & Christopher Kennedy, 156-182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kennedy, Christopher and McNally, Louise. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81:345-381. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0071
Lasersohn, Peter. 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75:522-551.
Li, Charles N and Thompson, Sandra A. 1989. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar, vol. 3. Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press.
Li, Wei-shan. 2007. The First Language Influence on the Second Language Acquisition of Mandarin Resultative Verb Compounds. MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Lin, Jingxia. 2019. Encoding Motion Events in Mandarin Chinese: A Cognitive Functional Study, vol. 10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.11
Lin, Jingxia and Peck, Jeeyoung. 2016. Classification of Mandarin Chinese simple adjectives: A scale-based analysis of their quantitative denotations. Language and Linguistics 18:1-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1606822X16649845
Lin, Jo-Wang. 2006. Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics 23.1:1-53.
Lin, Jo-Wang. 2007. Accomplishments and the encoding of telicity in Mandarin
Chinese. National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan.
Liu, Xun-ning. 2002. Xiandai hanyu ciwei ‘le’ de yufa yiyi [The syntax of the sentence-end marker ‘le’ in modern Chinese]. Chinese Teaching in the World 3:70-79.
Lu, John H. T. 1977. Resultative verb compounds vs. directional verb compounds in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 5.2:276-313. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23753020
Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistic Semantics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, Fabienne. 2011. Revisiting the distinction between accomplishments and achievements. From Now to Eternity, ed. by Jesse Mortelmans, Tanja Mortelmans, & Walter De Mulder, 43-64. Leiden: Brill.
Packard, Jerome L. 2000. The Morphology of Chinese: A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paradis, Carita. 1997. Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English, vol. 76. Lund: Lund University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/417454
Peck, Jeeyoung, Lin, Jingxia, and Sun, Chaofen. 2013. Aspectual classification of Mandarin Chinese verbs: A perspective of scale structure. Language and Linguistics 4:663-700.
Piao, Zheng-xiu. 2009. Xiandai hanyu xingrongci de liang yanjiu [Study of quantity in modern Chinese adjectives]. Doctoral dissertation, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Pustejovsky, James and Batiukova, Olga. 2019. The Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, and Svartoik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Pearson Longman.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2008. Lexicalized meaning and the internal temporal structure of events. Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect 110:13-42.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Levin, Beth. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure, ed. by Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron, & Ivy Sichel, 21-38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rotstein, Carmen and Winter, Yoad. 2004. Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: Scale structure and higher-order modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 12.3:259-288.
Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect (2nd ed.), vol. 43. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
Sun, Chaofen. 2013. Chinese resultative verb compounds: Lexicalization and grammaticalization. Breaking Down the Barriers: Interdisciplinary Studies in Chinese Linguistics and Beyond, ed. by Guangshun Cao, Chappell Hilary, Djamouri Redouane, & Wiebusch Thekla, 625-649. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Sybesma, Rint. 2017. Aspect, inner. Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics 1:186-193.
Tai, James H-Y. 1984. Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four categories. Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics, Chicago Linguistic Society: 289-296.
Toledo, Assaf and Sassoon, Galit W. 2011. Absolute vs. relative adjectives-variance within vs. between individuals. Proceedings of the 21st Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, ed. by Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches, & David Lutz, 135-154. New Brunswick: Semantics and Linguistic Theory.
Tseng, Shu-Chuan. 2010. Directional complements in Taiwan Mandarin natural speech. Language and Linguistics 11:469-501.
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Verbs and times. Linguistics in Philosophy, ed. by Zeno Vendler, 97-121. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.7591/9781501743726-005
Vlach, Frank. 1981. The semantics of the progressive. Syntax and Semantics: Tense and Aspect, ed. by Philip Tedeschi & Annie Zaenen, 271-292. New York: Academic Press.
Wang, Yu-yun. 2005. The multiplicity of the V-qi-lai construction. UST Working Papers in Linguistics 1:311-330.
Xiao, Richard and McEnery, Tony. 2004. Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: A Corpus-based Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027295019
Xu, Hong-zhi. 2021. The Chinese Aspectual System: Theory and Computation. Singapore: Springer. http://lib.ugent.be/catalog/ebk01:4100000011984347
Yang, Su-ying. 1995. The Aspectual System of Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria.
Zhang, Jie. 2011. Acquisition of the Chinese Resultative Verb Complements by Learners of Chinese as a Foreign Language: A Learner Corpus Approach. Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, State College.
Zhang, Li-hua. 1995. A Contrastive Study of Aspectuality in German, English, and Chinese, vol. 19. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Incorporated.