我國各單項運動協會近幾年努力爭取國際賽事在臺舉辦，除了增加我國在國際舞臺的曝光度，也透過國際賽事的舉辦，讓各國選手間相互交流的機會，進一步亦促使民眾、志工與體育相關人員對臺灣國際體育事務的關注和參與。其志工在從事國際體育事務的服務過程中，發揮自己專長、承擔責任，亦是一種當責的表現，其涉入程度正向且顯著的影響工作滿意度。本研究以臺灣國際體育事務志工為研究對象，於2019年3月2日至3月17日期間內，共計發放問卷528份，剔除無效問卷後，有效問卷310份。主要統計方法：描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、獨立樣本單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關分析和一般多元迴歸分析。本研究結果發現如下：一、臺灣國際體育事務志工多為女性、年齡層在21-25歲、教育程度為大專，活動參與次數多為1次、給自評表現的分數為81-90分。二、「知覺當責」、「涉入程度」與「滿意度」具有良好的信度，介於.81~.92之間。三、不同「性別」的志工在「知覺當責」的認知上有顯著差異。四、「知覺當責」、「涉入程度」與「滿意度」呈現顯著的正相關。五、「知覺當責」、「涉入程度」與「滿意度」具有顯著的解釋力。本研究建議可藉由參與國際體育事務活動，提升我國優秀國際體育事務人才的品質，未來在志工招募與工作過程中，可藉由調整工作內容來提升志工們的工作滿意度並發揮各自的專長，讓這些優秀志工人才加入臺灣國際體育領域，替體育外交盡一份心力。

Recently, by the efforts of each single-sport association, abundant international events have been held in Taiwan. These international events not only increase the publicity of Taiwan but also gave opportunities for sportsmen from various countries to exchange life experiences. In addition, these international sports affairs also help draw attention to Taiwanese people, volunteers, and sports-related people and encourage their participation. When participating in international affairs, volunteers show what they excel at and take on responsibility, which partially embodies the concept of accountability. The degree of involvement also affects job satisfaction positively and significantly. The present study investigated the volunteers who participated in Taiwan international sports affairs from March 2nd, 2019 to March 17th, 2019. Five hundred and twenty-eight questionnaires were distributed, 310 of which were valid. Descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis were adopted. The results showed that:1. Females participated in Taiwan international sports events more than males do. The age is between 21 to 25. Their educational background is college/university and they have more than one volunteering experience. Their own performances are scored from 81 to 90 (points). 2.Effective reliability is calculated among perceived accountability, involvement, and satisfaction, with values ranging between 0.81 and 0.92. 3.There are significant differences between genders in perceived accountability. 4.There are positive correlations between perceived accountability, involvement, and satisfaction. 5.Perceived accountability, involvement, and satisfaction are significant indices. Suggestions that sports-related people in Taiwan enhance their working quality by the participation of international sports events. For future volunteer recruitment and implementation, keeping work adjustable is the key to improving volunteers’ job satisfaction and optimizing the use of their skills. More importantly, it’s expected that outstanding volunteers can represent part of Taiwan sports and make great contributions to Taiwan’s sports diplomacy.

中華奧林匹克委員會 (2019)。國際體育事務人才。取自http://www.tpenoc.net/?cat=71
王滋瑩 (2014)。農會服務品質對顧客滿意度之影響－以新北市三重區農會為例 (未出版碩士論文)。淡江大學，新北市。
吳建明 (2008)。非營利組織志工參與動機與組織承諾之研究：以臺東縣救國團所屬社會基層團務組織志工為例 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺東大學，臺東縣。
李明儒、郭家瑜 (2011)。探討參與帆船運動者的參與動機、活動涉入及流暢體驗之研究。運動休閒餐旅研究，6 (1)，95-109。
林宜慧 (2009)。認知情感滿意度模式之建構與持續涉入之調節效果－以第17屆陽明山 國家公園路跑賽為例 (未出版碩士論文)。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。
林慧亭、林明宗、邱翼松 (2006)。參與體育志工動機之初探。輔仁大學體育學刊，5，276-286。
林樹旺 (2008)。建構自行車使用者休閒涉入對休閒效益之影響。運動與遊憩研究，2 (3)，130-149。
洪貴蘭 (2014)。我國大專校院青年國際志工之人格特質、動機與自我期許研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。
范思瑀 (2016)。大專實習生的工作價值觀與知覺當責之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
徐新勝 (2007)，衝浪活動參與者之休閒動機、涉入程度與休閒效益關係之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。
張志銘、呂崇銘、賴永僚、楊世達 (2006)。探討中部大專院校學生運動參與因素對社會心理涉入之影響。運動與遊憩研究，1 (2)，102-116。
張政德 (2017)。運動中心員工知覺組織支持、前瞻性人格與工作滿意度之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
張春興 (2006)。張氏心理學辭典 (簡明版)。臺北市：東華。
教育部 (2013)。體育運動政策白皮書。取自https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/3/RelFile/6315/6920/%E9%AB%94%E8%82%B2%E9%81%8B%E5%8B%95%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B82.pdf
梁朝雲、汪昭瑛、許育齡 (2007)。訊息來源可信度、情感認同與涉入程度對大學生採信消費性網路謠言之影響。教育資料與圖書館學，45 (1)，99-120。
許麗娟 (2009)。志願服務者之特質、性別角色對參與動機與服務類型選擇影響之探究：以南投縣為例 (未出版碩士論文)。亞洲大學，臺中市。
連央毅、湯雅琪、鄧碧雲 (2015)。主題性路跑參與者動機、涉入程度與滿意度之研究。休憩管理研究，2 (1)，13-34。
郭志豪 (2012)。組織人員當責性研究 (未出版碩士論文)。淡江大學，新北市。
陳弘慶 (2007)。2006年全國大專運動會參與者之涉入程度、體驗行銷、滿意度及忠誠度之相關實證研究。運動休閒管理學報，4 (1)，14-33。
陳庭君 (2017)。高雄市銀髮族休閒運動涉入程度、心流體驗與自我價值之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立屏東大學，屏東縣。
陳琪婷 (2008)。餐廳消費者購買涉入程度與購買決策關係之研究。人類發展與家庭學報，(10)，1-29。
湯雅琪 (2014)。主題性路跑參與者參與動機、涉入程度與滿意度之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
黃俊英、賴文彬 (1990)。涉入的理論發展與實務應用。管理科學學報，7 (1)，15-29。
黃美珠、陳美燕 (2013)。大型運動賽會志工參與動機與組織承諾之研究。台灣體育運動管理學報，13(1)，31-53。
楊世傑、楊天宇、陳美燕 (2014)。以口碑傳播觀點探討高爾夫消費者涉入與品牌形象之關係。臺灣體育運動管理學報，14 (2)，171-193。
葉承鑫、陳文喜、葉時碩 (2009)。遊客對其休閒涉入、知覺風險、休閒效益與幸福感之研究－以水域遊憩活動為主。運動休閒餐旅研究，4 (4)，1-25。
詹鈞智、葉公鼎 (2014)，大型國際運動賽會國際志工參與動機、阻礙、國際志工招募管理之研究。運動管理，25，48-67。
詹麗珊 (2000)。非營利機構之義工工作滿意度研究－以「國立科學工藝博物館」為例。 科技博物，4 (5)，29-49。
雷文谷、宋威穎、張涵筑、鄭子督、林聖峻、王顥羢 (2009)。淡水金色水岸自行車道使用者涉入程度、遊憩體驗與場地依戀之研究。人文暨社會科學期刊，5 (1)，67-81。
廖俊威 (2016)。自主、勝任與歸屬需求對員工感覺當責與工作滿意度的影響－以組織賦權為調節變項 (未出版碩士論文)。東吳大學，臺北市。
臺灣全球化教育推廣協會 (2015)。運動產業服務化時代來臨。English Career 56。取自：http://www.geat.org.tw/english-career/56/%E9%81%8B%E5%8B%95%E7%94%A2%E6%A5%AD%E6%9C%8D%E5%8B%99%E5%8C%96%E6%99%82%E4%BB%A3%E4%BE%86%E8%87%A8/
蔡佳靜 (2006)。訊息陳述方式、廣告訴求對象與涉入程度對廣告效果之影響－不同產品類別之探討。輔仁管理評論，13 (1)，85-106。
蔡昕璋 (2016)。大學外語系學生參與 TOEIC 國際志工之語言、文化習得經驗。學生事務與輔導，55 (2)，51-65。
鄭家瑜 (2011)。銀髮族休閒參與動機、涉入程度對心流體驗與幸福感之影響－以休閒阻礙為干擾 (未出版碩士論文)。國立澎湖科技大學，澎湖縣。
鄭順璁 (2001)。大學生生活型態、休閒動機與休閒參與之相關研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立體育大學，桃園市。
蕭嘉惠、徐偉庭、吳國銑 (2011)，運動志工之心理需求滿足、工作動機與組織承諾。臺灣體育運動管理學報，11 (3)，215-232。
賴文泰、呂錦隆 (2008)。應用涉入理論於運具選擇行為之研究。運輸計劃季刊，37 (2)，237-262。
戴有德、陳冠仰、李素馨 (2008)。遊憩涉入、場所依賴與場所認同因果關係之研究：以東豐綠色走廊遊憩自行車使用者為例。戶外遊憩研究，21 (4)，27-57。
Bergsteiner, H. (2011). Accountability Theory Meets Accountability Practice. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
Bolfing, C. P. (1988). Integrating Consumer Involvement and Product Perceptions with Market Segmentation and Positioning Strategies. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 5 (2), 49-57.
Brees, J., & Martinko, M. J. (2015). Judgments of responsibility versus accountability. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(4), 443-453.
Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 210-224.
Connors, R., & Smith, T. (2009). How Did that Happen?: Holding People Accountable for Results the Positive, Principled Way. New York, NY: Penguin.
Cummings, L. L., & Anton, R. J. (1990). The logical and appreciative dimensions of accountability. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cuskelly, G., Taylor, T., Hoye, R., & Darcy, S. (2006). Volunteer management practices and volunteer retention: A human resource management approach. Sport Management Review, 9(2), 141-163.
Dealy, M. D., & Thomas, A. R. (2006). Change or Die: How to Transform Your Organization from the Inside Out. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Fornell, C., M.D. Johnson, E.W., Anderson, J.C. &. Bryant, B.E (1996). The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 7-18.
Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (1998). Toward a theory of accountability in organizations and human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 1-51.
Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (2004). Advancing accountability theory and practice: Introduction to the human resource management review special edition. Human Resource Management Review, 14(1), 1-17.
George, J.M., ＆ Jones, G. R. (2008). Understanding and managing organizational behavior. New Jersey, NJ: customer reviews.
Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., & Bowen, M. G. (2003). Accountability in human resources management. In C. A. Schriesheim, & L. L. Neider (Eds.), New directions in human resources management (pp. 29-63). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
He, Y., Chan, L. K., & Tse, S. K. (2008). From consumer satisfaction to repurchase intention: The role of price tolerance in a competitive service market. Total Quality Management, 19 (9), 949-961.
Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., Gavin, M. B., Perrewé, P. L., Hall, A. T., & Frink, D. D. (2007). Political skill as neutralizer of felt accountability—job tension effects on job performance ratings: A longitudinal investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 226-239.
Houston, M. J., & Rothschild, M. L. (1978). Conceptual and Methodological Perspectives in Involvement. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The Theory of Buyer Behavior. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kalleberg, A. L. (1977). Work Values and job Rewards: A Theory of Job Satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 42(1), 124-143.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28 (2), 107-129.
Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2011). Marketing Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J. (1985) Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (1), 41-53.
Lerner, J, S. & Tetlock, P, E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255-275.
Lewis, R. C., & Booms, B. H. (1983). The marketing aspects of service quality. Emerging perspectives on services marketing, 65 (4), 99-107.
Mano, H. & Oliver, R. L. (1993). Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 451-465.
McIntyre, N. (1992). Involvement in risk recreation: A comparison of objective and subjective measures of engagement. Journal of Leisure Research, 24 (1), 64-71.
McMullan, R., & Gilmore, A. (2003). The conceptual of customer loyalty measurement: A proposed scale. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 11 (3), 230-243.
Mitchell, A. A. (1981). The Dimensions of Advertising Involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 8 (1), 25-30.
Oliver, R. L., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1988). Response determinants in satisfaction judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (4), 495-507.
Robbins (2001). Organization behavior: Concept, controversies, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Roper, K. A., & Russell, G. (1997). The effect of peer review on professionalism, autonomy, and accountability. Journal of Nursing Staff Development, 13 (4), 198-206.
Rothschild, M. L. (1984). Perspectives on involvement: Current problems and directions. In T. C. Kinnear (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11 (pp. 216-217). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Schlenker, B. R., & Weigold, M. F. (1989). Self-identification and accountability. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., & Doherty, K. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101(4), 632-652.
Selin, S., & Howard, D. (1988). Ego involvement and leisure behavior: A conceptual specification. Journal of Leisure Research, 20 (3), 237-244.
Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. (1969). The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Behavior. Chicago, IL: Raud McNally.
Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In Advances in experimental social psychology, 25, 331-376.
Tetlock, P.E., Skitka, L. & Boettger, R. (1989). Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 632-640.
Tse, D. K. & Wilton, P.C. (1988). Models of Consumer Datisfaction Formation, An Extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 204-212.
Vroom, V. H. (1962). Ego involvement, job satisfaction, and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 15 (6), 159-177.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
Wiley, C. G. E., Shaw S. M., & Havitz, M. E. (2000). Men’s and women’s involvement in sports: An examination of the gendered aspects of leisure involvement. Leisure Science, 22 (1), 19-31.
Woodside, A. G., Sulivan, D. P., & Trappey B.D. (1999). Assessing relationships among strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies, and organizational. Journal of Business Research, 45 (2), 135-148.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352.