Author: |
張菀珍 Wan-Jen Chang |
---|---|
Thesis Title: |
社區組織建構社區學習網絡之研究--以台北市文山社區大學和台北市八頭里仁協會為例 A Study of Community Organization Construction Learning Network--Examples of Wen-Shun Community University and the Association of Peitou Li Zen of Taipei City |
Advisor: |
楊國賜
Yang, Guo-Si 林振春 Lin, Jenn-Chuen |
Degree: |
博士 Doctor |
Department: |
社會教育學系 Department of Adult and Continuing Education |
Thesis Publication Year: | 2003 |
Academic Year: | 91 |
Language: | 中文 |
Number of pages: | 534 |
Keywords (in Chinese): | 社區組織 、學習網絡 、學習資源網絡 、數位學習網絡 、學習資源中心 |
Keywords (in English): | community organization, learning network, resource network, digital learning network, learning resource center |
Thesis Type: | Academic thesis/ dissertation |
Reference times: | Clicks: 228 Downloads: 158 |
Share: |
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report |
面對資訊社會網絡全球化、知識經濟時代的衝擊、以及人類學習型態與工作型態的改變,終身學習已經成為適應社會變遷與創新發展的基礎。而社區學習網絡的建構,更成為落實「思想全球化,行動在地化」的終身學習理想之基石,社區學習網絡的建構需結合社區組織的力量,經由共同學習與合作方能建立。
本研究的主要目的,在探討社區學習網絡建構的相關理念、架構與策略,國外社區組織建構社區學習網絡的發展經驗,及組織建構社區學習網絡的相關因素,歸納出社區組織建構社區學習網絡的架構、發展策略及組織相關經驗;其次,以台北市文山社區大學和台北市八頭里仁協會為研究對象,採用個案研究法取得其建構社區學習網絡的架構、發展策略及組織相關因素;接著,將文獻歸納的結果與研究對象發展現況做一比較分析,以發現我國社區組織建構社區學習網絡的優點及不足之處,並據以提出結論和建議,作為未來我國社區組織建構社區學習網絡之參考。
本研究的重要結論如下:
(一) 社區組織需將組織轉化為學習型組織,並以「學習-工作」網絡的模式,進行社區學習網絡的建構。
(二) 社區學習網絡的架構包括「社區學習資源網絡」、「社區數位學習網絡」和「社區學習資源中心」,其發展架構包括「建立社區夥伴組織」、「促進社區居民參與」、「執行績效評估」三部分及相關的發展策略。
(三) 台北市文山社區大學和台北市八頭里仁協會在組織學習的規劃上缺乏正規和非正規的學習方案;在推動社區學習活動時,發現資源整合有困難、居民參與學習不夠踴躍、無法針對不同對象的居民規劃學習活動;在推動社區資源網絡時較缺乏經費及志工的資源,希望政府能促進社區組織間學習資源的整合、輔導與評鑑工作。
(四) 台北市文山社區大學和台北市八頭里仁協會所建構的社區學習網絡,只有「社區學習資源網絡」,缺乏「社區數位學習網絡」和「社區學習資源中心」的架構;其發展架構部分以「建立社區夥伴組織」的相關發展策略較為完備,「促進社區居民參與」的策略則未盡理想,至於「執行績效評估」的策略則完全缺乏。
根據研究結論,提出以下建議:
(一) 社區組織的管理者須引導並規劃組織的「工作-學習」網絡之運作,以促進組織轉化為學習型組織的運作,並與學術機構或高等教育結合,以推動組織成員的正規與非正規學習。
(二) 社區組織應針對社區人口特質與族群特性進行學習需求的調查與分析,並依據其需求設計學習活動,由具有成人學習專業素養的人員協助進行學習輔導及諮詢的工作,並對參與學習者、中輟者進行學習問題輔導與追蹤,累積研究資料,發展出本土化的成人學習問題研究成果,方能促進社區居民參與學習,有助於社區終身學習理想的實現。
(三) 善用社區的社會人際網絡,網羅社區專業人士投入各項社區學習活動,並依據其專長與興趣加以分組,結合高等教育系所資源,進行各項正規、非正規及非正式學習的培訓,成為社區學習的志工,實際投入社區學習活動的經營與推動工作。
(四) 組織由中央至地方之「規劃委員會」、「輔導委員會」和「行動委員會」,促進社區學習網絡的建構。
(五) 政府應整合社區學校資源、工商企業資源、社區資訊業者及政府各項社區數位網絡資源,協助社區數位學習網絡之軟、硬體基礎建設的建立
(六) 由社區公、私部門組織共同規劃「社區學習資源中心」的組織架構、決策、權力結構及資源分配的機制
(七) 政府部門應與社區組織共同合作,籌措辦理社區學習活動的資金
(八) 對於社區組織對社區學習網絡的建構,應鼓勵多元化規劃、採用多樣化策略及創新發展,以符應社區組織不同的組織型態、利益和文化需求,結合公、私部門力量,共同建構出「國際性思考,本土化行動」的社區學習網絡
A Study of Community Organization Constructing Learning Network --Examples of Wen-Shun Community University and the Association of Peitou Li Zen of Taipei City
Wan-Jen Chang
Abstract
Because of facing the network globalization of information society, the impact of the times of knowledge-based economy and the changes of learning style and working style, life-long learning become the basis of adapting the changing society and innovative developments. The construction of society learning network can become the sill of “ Thinking Globalization and Acting localization ”. The construction of society network needs to combine the power of the organization through cooperation learning.
The major purpose of this research is to explore the related ideas, frames and strategies of society learning network, the development experience of constructing learning network in the foreign and the related factors of organizing and constructing the learning network, and include a suitable frame, developing strategies and experience of constructing community learning network. The frame, strategy and other factors of Wen-Shun Community University and the association of Peitou Li Zen of Taipei city, are analyzed and compared by the case study method. The advantages and strategies of these two community organizations in constructing learning network are listed. The conclusion and suggestions are described in the following.
The conclusion of this research is as follows:
1. The organization of the community needs be converted to a learning organization, and carry on the construction of community learning network with the mode of a “ learning-working ” network.
2. The frame of the learning network includes “ Learning Resource Network “, “ Digital Learning Network “ and “ Learning Resource Center “ and the development structure includes “establishing partnership’s organization “, “ promoting the participation of community residents “, “evaluating performance “and other related strategy of the development strategies.
3. Both cases in the community learning network lack a regular or irregular learning program in organization learning; it is difficult to integrate learning resources and the residents participate the learning program not enough eager in pushing the community learning; The resources of the fund and volunteers are not enough to push the community resources network.
4. Both cases in the community learning network only have “Learning Resource Network “ but lack “ Digital Learning Network “ and “ Learning Resource Center “; in the development frame, the developing strategy of “ establishing partnership’s organization “ is good in both cases. However, the strategy of “ promoting the participation of all community residents “ is weak and “ evaluating performance “ is not performed completely.
By the conclusions of this study, the following suggestions are proposed:
1. The administrator of the community organization must guide and plan the operations of the "working-learning" network to promote and convert the organization into operations of the learning organization. Also, the organization can unite learning organization and higher education to provide learning programs for community members learning with regular and irregular learning opportunity.
2. The community organization must investigate and analyze the learner requirement, which base on the characteristics of the community population and the ethnicity. The learning activities will be designed by the requirements. The professional, who are familiar with adult learning equipment, should assist the works of the learning guidance and consultation. These professional need to guide and to track the learner and the leave off man. Also the guidance and tracking data must be collected. By these data, the local culture problem of the adult learning will be researched and reported and understanding the adult learning problem, can be used to improve the participation and learning of the community residents. Thus, the dream of the lifetime learning will be come true.
3. The community organization must collect and ask the professionals, who are lived in the community, to play a part in the learning activity. These professional men can be divided into many groups by their special skill and interest. Also, the community organization must integrate the higher education resources to train the community professional men to be the volunteers and to operate the activity of the community learning.
4. The "planning committee," "guiding committee," "action committee," must be organized from the local to the center government to promote and construct the construct the network of the community learning.
5. The government must integrate the resources of the community school, the enterprise of the industry and business, the enterprise of the information and the digital network. These resources can be used to construct the infrastructure of the software and hardware in the community digital learning network.
6. The organization frame, decision, power structure and the mechanism of the resource allotment of the "community learning resource center" must be co-planning by the public and private organizations in the community.
7. The government must cooperate with community organization to raise funds for the learning activity.
8. To construct the community learning network, community organization should encourage diversity plan, adopt variety strategies and innovative development to conform the requirement of different styles, benefits and cultures of the community organization. That is, community organization should combine the power from the public and private departments to construct the community learning network with "international thinking and native action."
參考文獻 1
一、中文部份 1
王文科(1990)質的教育研究法。台北:師大書苑。
王世燁(2002)北投人的願景--北投憲章,收錄於台北市北投文化基金會所出版的「北投社區、文化、生態論文專輯」,頁435-452。
王仕圖(1993)快速成長社區的居民支持網絡與社區情感之研究--以「曉蘭社區」為例。私立東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
王政彥(2002)終生學習社區合作網絡的發展。台北:五南。
王紀鯤譯(1995) 匹茲堡及未來--非營利組織在都市未來發展所扮演的角色,中華民國建築師雜誌,21卷,11期。
元庚鮮(1999)非營利民間團體推動社區成人教育之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文。
台北市文山區公所(1999)台北市文山區為民服務手冊。台北市文山區公所
台北市八頭里仁協會(1999)「北投!我的家」--建構以溫泉為特色的生活家園。台北:台北市八頭里仁協會。
台北市八頭里仁協會(1996-2002)北投社雜誌,第1-25期。台北:台北市八頭里仁協會。
北投文化基金會(2001-2002)北投文化雜誌,第1-4期。台北:北投文化基金會。
田耐青 (1996a) 建構論的教與學:由一則電視廣告談起,教學科技與媒體雙月刊,29期,頁41-47。
田耐青 (1996b) 由知識論的角度分析教學科技的趨勢,國民教育雙月刊,37(1),頁45-48。
田耐青 (1997) 運用教學科技已落實建構論的鄉土教學,視聽教育雙月刊,38(4),頁28-33。
甘炳光等 (1996) 社區工作-理論與實踐。台北:五南。
尹青海 (1997) 教育部「遠距教學計畫」之現況,教育部電子計算中心簡訊, 8609期。
李永展(1995)社區環境與社區發展,社區發展季刊,第69期,頁53-61。
李宜真(1998)知識密集產業的知識管理架構。國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
李易駿(1997) 運用社區組織推展社區福利服務之可行性,社區發展季刊,第77期,頁33-40。
李政峰、葉毓蘭(1999)策略聯盟觀念運用於改善社區治安初探--以台北縣林口鄉麗林社區聯誼會為例,社區發展季刊,第78期,頁195-214。
李進寶等 (1998) 資訊網教育訓練的現況與趨勢,遠距教育,6期,頁30-37。
周志宏 (1999) 社區大學的理想及其實踐的難題-社區大學的法令與制度問題,收錄於「落實商教於地方--迎接社區大學的新時代研討會論文集」,頁33-42。
吳寶秀(1990)台灣製造業員工個人社會網絡分析,東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
邱天助(1996)社區組織在社區成人教育中的角色,社會教育學刊,第二十五期。
林振春(1998a)社區營造的教育策略。台北:師大書苑。
林振春 (1998b) 學習社會與社區教育,收錄於中華民國成人教育學會所主編的學習社會。台北:師大書苑。
林振春 (2000) 台北縣泰山鄉學習型社區實例報告,收錄於教育部89年度學習型社區領導人研習手冊。台北:國立台灣師範大學成人教育研究中心。
林振春 (2002) 社區生活服務產業之營造,收錄於國立臺灣師範大學成人教育研究中心,主辦之「91年地方造產性策略學習型社區行動方案成果研討觀摩會論文集」,頁3-(18-28)。
林淑英 (2001) 老樟有情‧文山有愛,,收錄於台北市社區大學主編之「社區成長學程社區工作專題發表手冊」,頁63-66。
林勝義 (1994) 調整公私立社教機構以落實終生教育,成人教育,22期。
林瑞穗 (1985) 蛻變中的都市社區與鄰里生活,思與言,第23卷,第3期。
林耀欽 (1999) 電子商務對企業運作影響之探析,資訊人通訊,56期,頁5-8。台北:資訊工業策進會。
周淑珍 (2001) 永安市場與我,收錄於台北市社區大學主編之「社區成長學程社區工作專題發表手冊」,頁67-69。
邱富宏 (1997) 線上輔助教學系統設計,第六屆國際電腦輔助教學研討會論文集。
邱貴發 (1996) 情境學習理念與電腦輔助學習-學習社群理念探討。台北:師大書苑。
邱義城(1998)策略聯盟新紀元,管理雜誌第289期,頁18-20。
范琳珮 (1995) 從社區發展需求探討國民小學校園開放與規畫-以幸安/和安、日新/建成、清江/奇岩為例,台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
胡夢鯨(1994)台灣地區成人教育現代化進程中的困境與出路,成人教育雙月刊,第十九期。
洪德仁等(2000)北投生活家園。台北:光寶文教。
洪德仁(2002)宜居宜遊的好所在--建構北投文化生態旅遊服務系統,收錄於國立臺灣師範大學成人教育研究中心,主辦之「91年地方造產性策略學習型社區行動方案成果研討觀摩會論文集」,頁4-(9-19)。
財團法人心路文教基金會、文山服務中心 (1998) 「社區照顧工作」專刊。財團法人心路文教基金會、文山服務中心。
孫秀蕙 (1997) 公共關係:理論、策略與研究實例。台北:正中。
孫清山、熊瑞梅 (1985) 社會資源與社會流動,國科會專題論文。
馬財專 (1992) 快速成長社區影響力結構的社會網絡分析,東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
徐震 (1986) 社區發展方法與研究。台北:中國文化大學出版部。
許秀影等(1998a) 「共享式電腦輔助教學發展環境之研究」,第七屆國際電腦輔助教學研討會論文集。
許秀影等(1998b) 虛擬團隊應用於發展網路遠距教學課程軟體之研究,遠距教育,第九期,頁15-19。
國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所 (1999) 學習社會實驗園區成果報告。
教育部 (2002) 90年度學習型社區執行成果報名書。教育部。
陳正昇 (1999) 觀光景點社區重建與學習趨勢-以日月潭風景區為例,收錄於社區總體營造與終生學習國際研討會論文集。嘉義:國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所。
陳全成 (1999) 教育部「推展學習型社區方案」-南王社區學習經驗,收錄於社區總體營造與終生學習國際研討會論文集。嘉義:國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所。
陳錦煌 (1999) 新港學習型社區的省思,收錄於社區總體營造與終生學習國際研討會論文集。嘉義:國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所。
陳德懷 (1997) LIS:全球社會學習網路(總計畫),八十六年度電腦輔助學習及遠距教學專題研究計畫成果討論會摘要,頁347-352,行政院國家科學委員會科學教育發展處主辦,國立暨南國際大學電子計算機中心承辦(10.27.1997)。
陳德懷 (1999) 「亞卓市簡介」講義,http://www.educities.edu.tw。
陳其南(1996)經營大台灣,從小社區做到,收錄於教改會第二十次委員會議委員報告書。「學校、社區與地方的教育學習體系」。
陳其南(1998)台灣地區推動社區總體營造的經驗-各國社區教育現況,頁111-126,中華民國社區教育學會主編。台北:師大書苑。
陳瑞貴、林志鴻 (1999) 未來學。台北:華泰文化事業公司。
陳雪雲 (1999) 學習型社區:全球化與終身學習的新視野,國立台灣師範大學社會教育學刊,第二十八期,頁21-46。
翁志維(1997)策略聯盟的過程、演進與學習之研究。國立中央大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
梁祖彬(1996)社區工作-理論與實踐。台北:五南。
陶藩瀛(1996)社區結社-基層組織領導者手冊。台北:心理。
游柏芬(1996)嘉義地區成人教育資源整合可行途徑之研究。國立中正大學城仁及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
曾琳雲(1997)非營利組織推展成人教育之研究--以社會大學為例。國立台灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
馮國堅、朱昌熙(1996)社區工作理論與實務,台北市:五南。
黃基森(1995)談社區與環境保護,社區發展季刊,第69期,62-66頁。
黃長春(1994)社區發展與社區家庭教育,社區發展季刊,第66期,9-13頁。
黃武雄 (1995) 台灣教育的重建--面對當前教育的結構性問題。台北:遠流。
黃武雄 (1998) 我們要辦什麼樣的社區大學-地方政府設置社區大學計劃通案,收錄於「台北縣社區大學籌辦紀實報告書」,頁13-28。
黃秉德(1998)非營利組織的管理理念--台灣經驗的分析,收錄於國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所出版之「非營利組織之經營管理與社會角色論文集」。
張尤娟、傅桂梅 (2001) 2000年明興社區健康營造,收錄於台北市社區大學主編之「社區成長學程社區工作專題發表手冊」,頁81-88。
張台山、張郁玲 (2001) 指南經驗-社區自主廚餘堆肥處理系統,收錄於台北市社區大學主編之「社區成長學程社區工作專題發表手冊」,頁74-80。
張德永 (1999) 打破菁英主義的意識型態--社區學院和社區大學的路線之爭,發表於「一九九九台灣學習型社區學術研討會論文集」。
張瓊齡 (1999) 文山社大公共論壇之規劃與執行,收錄於台北市政府教育局「台北市跨越2000年社區大學前瞻研討會」論文集,頁128-132。
張良蕙(2000) 社區公共生活之形成-以文山社區大學為例。國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
張郁靂(1997) 台灣社區網路的發展與未來--社區上網的策略研究。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
張菀珍(1998)學習社會與學習型組織,學習社會,頁239-266。台北:中華民國成人教育學會。
張菀珍 (1999) 建立以學習型組織為運作基礎的學習型社區種子人才培訓模式,收錄於學習型社區研討會論文集。國立台灣師範大學社會教育學系與成人教育中心。
教育部 (1998) 邁向學習社會白皮書。教育部編印。
資策會 (1999) 網路教學的興起,資訊人通訊,56期,頁1-4。台北:資訊工業策進會。
詹志禹 (1996) 認識與知識:建構論VS.接受觀,教育研究雙月刊,49期,頁25-38。
葉榮木、張素惠 (2000) 從學習的觀點探索現代教學科技與教學改革,教學科技與媒體雙月刊,49期,頁2-8。
葉毓蘭、李政峰(1999)策略聯盟觀念運用於改善社區治安初探:以台北縣林口鄉蒞臨社區聯誼會為例,社區發展季刊,第八十七期,頁195-214。
楊志彬 (2001) 文山社區大學社區經營策略的轉折與發展,收錄於台北市社區大學主編之「社區成長學程社區工作專題發表手冊」,頁46-48。
楊孝濚(1987)福利社區化之實務運作,社區發展季刊,第77期,50-56頁。
楊瑩(1999)社區工作模式在福利社區化過程中之運用--以鹿港實驗計畫為例,社區發展季刊,第78期,頁35-57。
楊國賜(1987)社會教育的理念。台北:師大書苑。
蔡采秀 (1988) 影響台灣地區家庭親屬網絡因素的分析,東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
蔡宏進(1984)社區原理。台北:三民。
蔡宏進(1996)社區發展中對社區組織的運用,社區發展季刊,第七十四期,頁87-98。
蔡秀美 (1999) 學習型社區理念的探討,國立台灣師範大學社會教育學刊,第二十八期,頁1-20。
蔡保田 (1995) 調查研究法在教育上的應用,收錄於中國教育學會主編之「教育研究方法論」。台北:師大書苑。
蔡傳暉 (1999) 社區大學的基本理念與發展現況,收錄於台北市文山社區大學八十八學年度第一學期「入學與選課手冊」,頁187-198。
蔡傳暉、顧忠華、黃武雄等 (1999) 台北市設置社區大學規劃研究暨試辦計畫總報告,台北市教育局編印。
蔡麗美 (2001) 陳情的故事,收錄於「北投地方史--教育篇」,台北:北投文化基金會。
熊瑞梅(1995)社會網絡的資料蒐集、測量及分析。中央研究院民族學研究所。
蔡培村(1996)高雄市社區成人教育體系之規劃研究。高雄市政府研究發展考核委員會。
鄭如惠(1994)居民參與地區環境改善作業模式之研究-以參與士林福志里地區為例。私立淡江大學建築研究所碩士論文。
鄭秀娟 (2001) 守護景美溪行動之省思,收錄於台北市社區大學主編之「社區成長學程社區工作專題發表手冊」,頁90-98。
鄭晉昌 (1993) 自「情境學習」的認知觀點探討電腦輔助中教材內容的設計-從幾個教學系統談起,教學科技與媒體雙月刊,12期,頁51-62。
劉弘煌(1996)老人志願工作之運用與社區發展,社區發展季刊,第74期,頁87-98。
劉弘煌(1999)都市型社區的社會福利社區化-以臺北市文山區的經驗為例,社區發展季刊,第87期,頁58-71。
盧偉斯(1996)組織學習的理論性探究。國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。
賴雪麗(2001)興家社區安全活動系列成果,收錄於台北市社區大學主編之「社區成長學程社區工作專題發表手冊」,頁58-62。
賴麗珍(1996)從成教機構的分類談非營利成教機構的管理,成人教育雙月刊,33期。
韓榮姿(1998)社區發展政策中民眾參與情形之研究--以台北市社區發展協會為例。國立中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。
蕭玉煌(1999)組織再造-社區組織工作省思與前瞻,社區發展季刊,第八十七期,頁16-33。
顧忠華 (1999) 如何落實高等教育權於地方,收錄於「落實高教於地方--迎接社區大學的新時代研討會論文集」,頁3。
羅秀華(2001) 以文山坊作為社區充權的啟動器,收錄於台北市社區大學主編之「社區成長學程社區工作專題發表手冊」,頁49-57。
蘇景輝(1996)社區工作理論與實務。台北:巨流。
Alvin Toffler著,蔡坤章譯 (1984) 鉅變中的世界。台北:志文出版社。
Frank Webster著,馮建三譯 (1999) 資訊社會理論。台北:遠流出版社。
Manuel Castells 著,夏鑄九等譯 (1998) 網絡社會之崛起。台北:唐山出版社。
Jeannette & Gordon著,林麗寬譯 (1997) 學習革命。台北:中國生產力中心。
Ulrich Beck 著,孫治本譯(1999) 全球化危機。台北:商務印書館。
二、西文部份 1
Argyris, C.(1977) Double-loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55 (5), 115-134.
Argyris, C. and Donald A. S.(1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
Atkinson,M.M. and William,D.C.(1989)Policy networks,policy communities and the problem of governance, Governance 5(2),p.154-180.
Barbar, Benjamin (1984) Strong Democracy, Berkerley: University of California Press.
Bay Area Community Outreach Partnership Center(2000) http://www-iurd.ced.berkeley.edu/bacopc/frame_index.htm.
Bell, Daniel (1979) ‘The Social Framework of the Information Society’, reprinted in T. Foster (ed.), The Microelectronics Revolution, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bennett,A.(1973)Professonal Staff Members’ Contribution to Community Development. J.Community Dev.Soc.4(1):p.58-68.
Bennett,j.Kremer and Micheal J. O’Brien.(1994)”The Bulding Blocks of Learning Organization.” Training, 31(6):41-49.
Blackstone, B. (1999a) Opening address, Learning Partnerships National Conferense: Learning to Succeed through Partnerships Conference Report.
Blackstone, B. (1999b) Keynote Adress, Learning Partnerships National Conferense: Learning to Succeed through Partnerships Conference Report.
Blakely, G. L., Martinec, C. L., &Lane, M. S. (1994). Management development programs: The effects of Management level and corporate strategy. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 5(1), 5-19.
Brookfied, S. (1983) Adult Learners, Adult Education and the Community. British: Open University.
Butcher,H.(1980)Community Groups in Action: Case Studies and Analysis. London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Cann, Anthony (1999) Organising for Success, Learning Partnerships National Conferense: Learning to Succeed through Partnerships Conference Report.
Christianne Moretti (1997) “E-Learning: Using the Internet/Intranet to Deliver IT Training”. Informational Data Corporation.
Cresson, E. (1996) The European year of lifelong . Adults Learning, 7(9),215-218.
Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 588(4), 37-52.
DfEE of UK (1998a) “The Survey”- Learning Towns and Cities. UK: DfEE Press.
DfEE of UK (1998b) Learning Towns and Cities: “The Toolkit”-Practice, Progress and Value, UK: DfEE Press.
DfEE of UK (1998c) Learning City Network. UK: DfEE Press.
DfEE of UK (1999) Workshops, Learning Partnerships National Conferense: Learning to Succeed through Partnerships Conference Report.
Duke, C. (1998) In Search of the learning Society. 終身學習年國際終身學習學術研討會論文集, 頁29-46, 台北: 成人教育學會。
Edmonton Alberta (1995) “The Future of Learning”. , http://137.82.166.277/paper.html.
Edmonton Alberta (1996) “Strategies for the Future”. , http://bates.cstudies.ubc.ca/paper.html.
Edwards, R. (1997) Changing places? Flexibility, lifelong learning and learning society. London & New York: Routledge.
Eilif Trondsen & Kent Vickery (1996) “Learning on Demand”. SRI Consulting.
Ellen H. Julian (1997) “The Market for Web-Based Training: A Look at Current Development in Internet and Intranet Course Delivery”. International Data Corporation.
Ellinger, A. M.(1997). Manarers as facilitators of learning in learning organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Atbens.
Fischer, Claude S. (1977) Networks and places: Social Relations in the Urban Setting. New York: The Free Press.
Fischer, Claude S. (1981) To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fred J. Van der Krogt(1998) Learning Network Theory: The Tension Between Learning Systems and Work Systems in Organizations, Humman Resource Development Quarterly, vol.9,no.2, Summer . Publisher: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Freeman, Christopher and Perez, Carlota (1988) ‘Structural Crises of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour’, in Dosi et al., ch.3:38-66.
French, R.,&Bazalgette, J. (1996). From "learning Organizations" to "teaching-learning organization"?Management Learning, 27 (1), 113-128.
Freudenburg, Willam R. (1986) The Density of Acquaintanceship: An Overlooked Variabe in Community Research? American Journal of Sociology 92: 27-63.
Friedrichs, Jurgen and Harmust Ludtke(1974) Participant Observation: Theory and practice. Westmead, UK: Saxon House.
Galer, Graham and Kees Ven der Heijden(1992)” The Learning Organization: How Planners Creat Organizational Learning.” Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 10(6):5-12.
Garvin, D.A. (1993) “Building a Learning Organization”, Harvard Business Review, July- August.
Giddens, Antony (1985) The Nation State and Violence: Volume Two of a Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Cambridge: Polity.
Giddens, Antony (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.
Glenda C. Rakes (1996) Using the Internet as a Tool in a Resource Based Learning Environment. Educational Technology, September-October.
Goldenberg, E. N. (1975) Making the papers. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.
Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Harbermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Harmon, H.L.(1987) Teaching and Serving Adults Through Vocational Technical Paper, presented at the Adult Coordinators' Conference. Oak Hill.
Hasan, A. (1996) Lifelong learning. In A. C. Tujnman(ed.) International Encyclopedia of Adult Education and Training.
Holub, Robert C. (1991) Jurgen Habermas: Critic in the Public Sphere. Routledge.
Huber George P. and Richard L.Daft.(1987)”The Information Environments of Organizations.” In F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts and L. Poters(eds), Handbook of Organization Communication. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
Hunter, Floyd (1953) Community Power Structure. University of North Carolina Press.
Jashapara, Ashok.(1993)”The Competitive Learning Organization:A Quest for Holy Grail.” Management Decision, 31(8):52-62.
Jones,D.(1981)Community Work in the United Kingdom, in Resdings, in Community Work,edit by P.Henderson and D.N.Thomas.London:George Allen and Unwin.
King, Christine (1999) Partnership: A Better Deal for Learners, Learning Partnerships National Conferense: Learning to Succeed through Partnerships Conference Report.
Levitt, B. and March, J.(1988) “Organizational Learning”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol.14,1988.
Laumann, Edward O. and David Knoke (1987) The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. The University of Wisconsin Press.
Logan, John R. and Harvey L. Molotch (1987) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of place, Berkeley, C.A: Univ. of Califonia Press.
Longworth, M. (1999) Making Lifelong Learning Learning Work: Learning Cities for A Learning Century. London: Kogan Page Press.
Longworth, N. (1999) Making Lifelong Learning Work: Learning Cities for A Learning Century. London: Kogan Page Press.
Mansbridge, Jane J.(1983) Beyond Adversary Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marquardt, M.J. (1996) Building the Learning Organization -A Systems Approach to Quantum Improvement and Global Success. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Marquardt, M.J.(1996)Building the Learning Organization - A Systems Approach to Quantum Improvement and Global Success.New York:McGraw-Hill.
McAdam,D.(1986)Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer. Amertican Journal of Sociology,92:64-90.
McCarthy, John D. and Mayer N. Zaid (1973) The Trend of Social Movements in American: Proffessionalization and Resource Mobilization. Morristown, N.J. : General Learning Press.
Michael QuinnPatton(1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage Publications, Inc.
Mills, C. Wright (1956) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mintzberg, H.(1990). The manager's job: Folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 163-176.
NIACE(2001)Learning towns and cities.
http://www.lifelong-learning.co.uk/learningcities.
Nohria,N.(1992)Is a network perspective a useful way of studying organizatuons? In N.Nohria & R.G.Eccles(Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure,form,and action(pp.1-22). Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
Nonaka, A. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I.,&Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
Norman, D. (1999) “Learning Communities for a Learning Century”, International Conference on the Integrated Development and Lifelong Learning of Community in Taiwan. National Chung Cheng University.
Office of Learning Technologies Human Resources Development Canada(2000) http://olt-bta.hrdc.gc.ca/publicat/59004exesum_e.html
OLD(1997)Why community Networking? http://bcn.boulder.co.us/community.
Olsen, E. Marvin (1982) participatory pluralism, Chicago: Nelson-Hall
Popple, K. (995) Analysing Community Work--Its Theory&Practice. Buckingham: OUP.
Rubenson, K. (1997) Two generation of lifelong learning. Paper present at the 2nd International Conference on Adult Education Research&Its Journal. Hong Kong: Caritas Adult&Higher Education Service.
Senge, P. M. (1990a). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.
Shrivastava, Paul.(1983)”A Typology of Organizational Learning Systems.” Journal of Management Syudies,20(1):8-28.”
Shrivastava, Paul and John H. Grant.(1985)”Empiricallp Derived Modles of Strategic Decision-making Processes.” Strategic Management Journal,5:97-113.
Shrivastava, Paul and Sidney A.Nachman.(1989)”Strategic Leadership Pattern.” Strategic Management Journal,10:51-66.
Taira, Kojiand Teiichi wada (1987) Business-Government Relations in Modern Japan. In intercorporate Relations, edited by Mark S.Mizruchi. Cambridge University Press.
Twelvetrees, A. (1991) Community Work. London: Macmillan.
Warren,R.(1978)New Perspectives on the American Community: A Book of Readings(third edition). Chicago:Rand McNally.
Watkins, K. E., &Marsick, V. J. (1992). Building the learning organization: A new role for human resource developers. Studies in Continuing Education, 14(2), 115-129.
Watkins, K. E. & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Watson, T. J. (1996). How do managers think? Identity, morality, and pragmatism in managerial theory and practice. Management Learning, 27 (3), 323-341.
Webber, A. M. (1993, Jan.-Feb.). What's so new about the new economy? Harvard Business Review, pp. 24-42.
Wellman, Berry (1979) The Community Question Re-Evaluted. In Power, Community and Community Research, edited by Micael Peter Smith. New Jersey: New Bruuswick. pp.81-107.
Viliers, C. & Pistorius, M. & Alexander, M. & Pooly, N.F. (1992) Constraints on computer-as-sisted instruction in a distance education environment. Computing & Control Engineering Journal.
Vnger, J. L. (1993) Volunteer development: Individual and Orgnizational Considerations. In Connor, (Ed), pp.255-279.
Walsh, J.P. and Ungson, G.R. (1991) “ Organization Memory”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.16, No 1,1991,pp.57-91.
Watkinins, K. E.&Marsick,V. J.(1993) Sculpting the learning Orgnization: lessons in the art and science of systemic change. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass Pudlishers.
Wolf, T. (1990) Managing a Nonprofit organization. New York: Simon &shuster.