簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 丁淑觀
Ting, Shu-Kuan
論文名稱: 青少年人格特質、家人互動、利社會行為、風險信念與網路霸凌結構方程模型之研究
Adolescent Personality Traits Family Interaction Pro-social Behaviors Risk Belief and Cyberbullying Study for Structural Equation Model
指導教授: 戴建耘
Dai, Chien-Yun
口試委員: 林騰蛟 張明文 張玉山 謝傳崇 戴建耘
口試日期: 2021/07/16
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工業教育學系
Department of Industrial Education
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 165
中文關鍵詞: 人格特質利社會行為風險信念網路霸凌
英文關鍵詞: Personality traits, Prosocial behavior, Risk belief,, Cyberbullying
研究方法: 調查研究
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101296
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:176下載:13
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要研究青少年人格特質、風險信念、利社會行為、家人互動生活與課業覺知與親身受到網路霸凌、周圍受到網路霸凌結構方程模型之研究。研究結果的路徑分析:1.人格特質外向型對象具有高度的利社會行為。2.人格特質外向型和焦慮型的對象都具有高度的風險信念。3.人格特質焦慮型對象親身遭遇的網路霸凌事件與周圍遭遇的網路霸凌事件具有可預測的顯著正相關。直接間接效果分析:1.家人生活互動覺知、家人課業互動覺知、風險信念等因素對於人格特質焦慮型對象與他的周圍網路霸凌事件有間接效果影響。2.家人互動生活覺知、家人互動課業覺知等因素對人格特質焦慮型對象與他的親身網路霸凌事件有間接效果影響。SEM結構的潛在成長模型分析:1.在課業以及在生活方面,男生比女生更高度地依賴家人。男生比女生有更多的利社會行為。女生比男生有更高的比例為焦慮型人格。2.國中二年級的青少年會更清楚自己的人格特質。儘管國中一年級的對象很少有風險信念,當成長到國中三年級的時候有更高度的風險信念。3.生活方面,青少年在國三比國一時更高度依賴家人。

    This research is mainly about junior high students’ personality traits on the internet, risk beliefs, socially beneficial behaviors, family interaction, academic awareness and personal perceptions of cyberbully. Path analysis of research results: 1. Extraversion have a high degree of prosocial behavior. 2. Both extraversion and neuroticism have high risk beliefs. 3. The cyberbullying incidents encountered by individuals with neuroticism have a predictably significant positive correlation with the cyberbullying incidents encountered in their surroundings. Analysis of direct and indirect effects: 1. Factors such as family life interaction awareness, family homework interaction awareness, risk beliefs... and other factors have an indirect effect on the neuroticism and their surrounding cyberbullying incidents. 2. Family interactive life awareness, family interactive schoolwork awareness... and other factors have an indirect effect on the neuroticism and the cyberbullying incidents they encountered. The potential growth model analysis of the gender SEM structure of the research results: 1. In terms of schoolwork and daily life, boys are more highly dependent on their families than girls. Boys have more prosocial behavior than girls. Girls have a higher proportion of neuroticism than boys. The potential growth model analysis of the academic year SEM structure of the research results: 1. Teenagers in the second grade of junior high school will be more aware of their personality traits. Although the subjects in the first grade of junior high school rarely have risk beliefs, they have higher risk beliefs when they grow up to the second grade of junior high school. 2. In terms of daily life, teenagers are more dependent on their family members in the third grade of junior high school than in the first grade of junior high school.

    目 次 謝 辭 ................................................................................................................ i 摘 要 ................................................................................................................ ii Abstract .............................................................................................................. iii 目 次 ............................................................................................................... ⅳ 表 次 ................................................................................................................ⅵ 圖 次 .............................................................................................................ⅷ 第一章 緒論 .................................................................................................... 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 ....................................................................... 1 第二節 研究目的.................................................................................... 6 第三節 重要名詞定義............................................................................. 9 第四節 研究方法與步驟.......................................................................11 第五節 研究流程................................................................................... 13 第二章 文獻探討 .......................................................................................... 15 第一節 網路霸凌的相關文獻 .......................................................15 第二節 人格特質 ...................................................................................30 第三節 風險信念 ...................................................................................34 第四節 利社會行為............................................................................... 40 第五節 家人互動覺知........................................................................... 44 第三章 研究設計與實施 .............................................................................. 51 第一節 研究架構 .................................................................................. 51 第二節 研究假設與模式 .......................................................................54 第三節 研究工具 .................................................................................. 63 第四節 研究對象與實施........................................................................ 72 第五節 資料處理 .................................................................................. 74 第四章 資料分析與結果 .............................................................................. 77 第一節 研究變項常態性統計與信度.................................................... 78 第二節 潛在變項相關分析....................................................................82 第三節 研究模式適配度分析............................................................... 96 第四節 整體結構關係模式驗證分析.................................................. 102 第五節 潛在變項直接效果與間接效果分析......................................118 第六節 SEM結構方程的潛在成長模型分析..................................... 126 第五章 結論與建議 .................................................................................. 131 第一節 主要研究發現.........................................................131 第二節 結論...................................................................137 第三節 建議..........................................................................140 參考文獻 .......................................................................................................143 壹、中文部分 ........................................................................................ 143 貳、英文部分 .........................................................................................149 附錄 .......................................................................................................161 壹、附錄一 原始問卷量表題號編碼............................................... 161 貳、附錄二 刪題後問卷量表題號............................................... 162 參、附錄三 正式量表........................................................................... 163

    參考文獻
    壹、 中文部分
    丁思惠、陳喬琪(2006)。憂鬱症的婚姻與家庭治療。北市醫學雜誌,3(10),954-961。
    王恭志(2000)。教師教學信念與教學實務之探析。教育研究資訊,8(2),84-98。
    江雅芳(2012)。看不見的拳頭:網路霸凌。諮商與輔導,323,62-63。
    朱美瑰(2008)。網路犯罪新型態~看不見的拳頭;青少年網路霸凌現象初探。諮商與輔導,268,6-10。
    朱偉慈、廖乃賢、徐振翔、邱敬烜、智意誠、陳志強、紀昱宏(2019)。大學生社群網路使用行為與網路霸凌認知相關性研究。危機管理,16(1),47-58。
    沈六(1993)。群育的科學基礎—利社會行為之發展。訓育研究,32 (2),53-63。
    余民寧、李仁豪(2014)。臺灣中老年人外向性及神經質人格、社會支持與主觀幸福感關係之模型建構及其結構係數比較。教育心理學報,45(4),455-474。
    吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式:AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市:五南。
    吳明隆(2015)。SPSS統計應用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計。新北市:易習。
    吳明隆、張毓仁(2018)。SPSS問卷統計分析快速上手祕笈。臺北市:五南。
    吳佳儀、李明濱、張立人(2015)。網路霸凌之身心反應與防治。台灣醫界,58(6),9-13。
    吳秉育(2017)。大學生網路霸凌受害經驗與憂鬱相關研究:以認知導向情緒調節為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。
    李怡君、林楷雯(2020)。隱形傷口—網路霸凌與自殺之相關探究。諮商與輔導,410,6-10。
    李茂能(2009)。圖解AMOS在學術研究之應用。台北:五南。
    林秀姿(2011)。天下的「媽寶」都是一樣的父母造成。聯合新聞網。取自http://udn.com/NEWS/LIFE/X1/8697985.shtml
    林育陞(2016)。新興的霸凌模式:網路霸凌。諮商與輔導,369,25-29。
    林進材(1997)。國民小學教師教學思考之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    兒童福利聯盟(2016)。2016年台灣兒少網路霸凌經驗調查報告。2018年4月30日,取自: http://www.children.org.tw/news/advocacy_detail/1538
    兒童福利聯盟(2012)。2012 年兒少網路行為調查報告。2018年4月30日,取自:https://isafe.moe.edu.tw/statistics_detail.php?sn=71
    周倩等(2010)。中小學網路素養與認知。2018年4月30日,取自:http://eteacher.edu.tw/About.aspx
    邱皓政(2000)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗資料分析範例解析。台北:五南。
    邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北:雙葉。
    邱皓政(2005)。量化研究法(二)統計原理與分析技術。台北:雙葉。
    施琮仁(2017)。台灣青少年網路霸凌現況、原因與影響。中華傳播學刊,32,203-240.
    施雅薇(2004)。國中生生活壓力、負向情緒謂適、社會支持與憂鬱情緒之關聯(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南。
    許嘉尹(2003)。兒童焦慮及其相關因素之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。
    陳正健(2016)。研究:直升機父母 孩子易沉迷手機。台灣醒報。2018年4月30日,取自: https://anntw.com/articles/20160107-ki6Z
    陳金定(2007)。青少年發展與適應問題—理論與實務。台北市:心理。
    陳春秀(2001)。國小高年級學童親子溝通、家庭氣氛與親子關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義。
    陳茵嵐 (2012)。e 世代的攻擊行為:網路霸凌(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹。
    陳景花 (2019)。網路霸凌面面觀。輔導季刊,55(3),25-41。
    陳新豐 (2014)。結構方程模式:Mplus的應用。台北市:心理。
    陳寬裕、王正華(2012)。論文統計分析實務:SPSS 與AMOS 的運用。臺北市:五南。
    陳寬裕(2018)。結構方程模型分析實務:SPSS與SmartPLS的運用。臺北市:五南。
    陳德嫻 (2009)。青少年同儕影響力之理論探討。諮商與輔導,282,2-5。
    郭怡汎(2004)。屏東縣市國小普通班學童自我概念與利社會行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東。
    張芳全、詹秀雯(2018)。基隆市國中生學習成就影響因素之縱貫性研究。臺北市立大學學報,49(2),1-32。
    張春興(2013)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐(二版)。台北:東華。
    張李宥茹(2019)。媽寶行為覺知、補習投入與持續補習意願之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北。
    張佩瑛,蔣治邦(2010)。課堂內師生問答互動之研究:國小數學課問答互動中教師教學信念與教學處理的關係。教育心理研究,23,99-122。
    程秀蘭、林世華、吳麗娟(2001)。大學生知覺父母權威性與其生氣歷程、憂鬱傾向之相關研究。教育心理學報,32(2),19-44。
    程景琳(2010)。社交計量及同儕知覺受歡迎度與青少年關係攻擊及孤寂 感之相關研究。教育心理學報,42,143-162。
    楊浩然(2002)。青少年憂鬱疾患及憂鬱症狀之追蹤研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣大學,台北。
    楊國樞(1986)。家庭因素與子女行為:臺灣研究的評析。中華心理學刊,28(1),7-28。
    彭菊仙(2016)。管教的勇氣:該管就要管,你要幫孩子變得更好。臺北市:時報出版。
    黃小清 (2016)。爸媽必看:寫完這25題親子測驗就知道你自己有沒有教出「媽寶」。商業周刊。2019年6月13日,取自: http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/KBlogArticle.aspx?id=15370
    黃天佑(2010)。國中生網路霸凌行為相關影響因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺東大學,台東市。
    黃郁娟(2015)。人格特質、情緒調節、生活壓力與青少年自傷行為之關聯(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹。
    黃堅厚(2013)。人格心理學(十版)。台北:心理。
    黃敦晴(2019)。1/3孩子每週上網購物?!美國兒童、青少年媒體使用普查,顛覆父母的6大迷思。親子天下雜誌,2019年11月13日,取自:https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5080673-1%EF%BC%8F3%E5%AD%A9%E5%AD%90%E6%AF%8F%E9%80%B1%E4%B8%8A%E7%B6%B2%E8%B3%BC%E7%89%A9%EF%BC%9F%EF%BC%81%E7%BE%8E%E5%9C%8B%E5%85%92%E7%AB%A5%E3%80%81%E9%9D%92%E5%B0%91%E5%B9%B4%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E6%99%AE%E6%9F%A5%EF%BC%8C%E9%A1%9B%E8%A6%86%E7%88%B6%E6%AF%8D%E7%9A%846%E5%A4%A7%E8%BF%B7%E6%80%9D/?c=20
    黃意舒(2000)。利社會行為。2018年10月12日,取自:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1305462/
    詹志禹(2013)。錯愛孩子的四種方法。親子天下,51,94-95。
    鄭惠萍(2002)。雙親教養態度人格特質、社會支持、生活事件與青少年心理健康。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南。
    廖國良、黃正魁、張仁俊、劉籹君(2012)。臺灣網路霸凌之實證研究。資訊與管理科學,5(1),31-55。
    蔡玉瑟、張妤婷、謝孟岑(2006)。資優兒童的父母教養方式與情緒智力之相關研究。臺中教育大學學報,20,63-87。
    劉正杰、董旭英(2018)。以同儕關係、從眾行為與認知同理心探討網路霸凌旁觀者之行為傾向。中華心理學刊,60(2),101-124。
    龍瑞雲(2012)。網路霸凌患者增,國中女生居多。2018年3月24日, 取自:http://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201203240055-1.aspx
    謝意苹(2013)。網路惡勢力:青少年網路霸凌之多面向探究。人文與社會科學簡訊,14(3),64-71。
    賴怡君(2001)。國小學童情緒智力發展、依附關係與生活適應之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
    賴怡君(2015)。防制網路霸凌法律近期發展。科技法律透析,27(10),16-23。
    羅瑞玉(1997)。國小學生的利社會行為及其相關因素之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    蕭佳純(2015)。國小學童科學創造力成長歷程之縱貫性分析。科學教育學刊,23(1),23-51。
    魏翊雄(2012)。青少年網路霸凌行為及影響因子調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮。
    錢柏康(2016)。從生態系統理論看網路霸凌。諮商與輔導,369,18-21。

    貳、 英文部分
    Abreu, R. L., & Kenny, M. C. (2017). Cyberbullying and LGBTQ youth: A systematicliterature review and recommendations for prevention and intervention. Journal of Child Adolescence Trauma, 1,1–17.
    Afshar, H., Roohafza, H. R., Keshteli, A. H., Mazaheri, M., Feizi, A., & Adibi, P. (2015). The association of personality traits and coping styles according to stress level. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 20(4), 353–358.
    Ahmed, F., Campbell, P., Jaffar, A., & Alkobaisi, S. (2010). Learning & personality types: A case study ofa software design course. Journal of Information Technology Education, 9, 237-252.
    Ainsworth, M.D., Bell, S.M., & Stayton,D.1. (1971). Individual differences in strange situation behavior of one-year-olds. In H. R. Schaffer (Ed.). The origins of human social relations. London: Academic Press.
    Akbulut, Y., Sahin, Y. L., & Eristi, B. (2010). Cyberbullying Victimization among Turkish Online Social Utility Members. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13 (4) , 192-201 .
    Akaike. H. (1981). Likelihood of a model and information criteria. Journal of Econometrics, 16, 3-14.
    Akaike. H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
    Almlund, M., A.L.,Duckworth, A.L., Heckman, J., Kautz,T. (2011).Personality psychology and economics.Handbook of the economics of education, 4, 1-181.
    Anderson, C., Spataro, S. E., & Flynn, F. J. (2008). Personality and organizational culture as determinantsof influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 702-710.
    Anderson, T. & Sturm, B. (2007). Cyberbullying: From playground to computer. Young Adult Library Services, 5(2), 24-27.
    Anna C.B. & David P. F. (2019). Cyberbullying and cyber victimization versus parental supervision, monitoring and control of adolescents' online activities. Children and Youth Services Review, 96, 302-307 .
    Ariani, D. W. (2013). Personality and learning motivation. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(10), 26-38.
    Baloi, D. and Price, A. D. F. (2003). Modeling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance. International Journal of Project Management, 21 (4) , 261–269.
    Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A., 1986. The ModeratorMediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, andStatistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    Bar-Tal, D. (1976). Prosocial behavior: Theory and research. Washington D.C: Hemisphere.
    Bastiaensens, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully .Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 259- 271.
    Berger, A. (2006). 50 ways to understand communication: A guided tour of key ideas and theorists in communication, media and culture. New York: Roeman & Littledield.
    Betts, L. R. (2016). Cyberbullying: Approaches,Consequences, and Interventions. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Black, B., & Logan, A. (1995). Links between communication patterns in mother-child, father-child, and child-peer interactions and children’s social status. Child Development, 66 , 255-271 .
    Bollmer, J. M., Milich, R., Harris, M. J., & Maras, M. A. (2005). A friend in need: The role of friendship quality as a protective factor in peer victimization and bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 701-712.
    Brody, N.,& Vangelisti, A. L. (2016). Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. Communication Monographs, 83, 94-119 .
    Brunel, F. F., & Nelson, M. R. (2000). Explaining gendered responses to help-self and help-others charity ad appeals: The mediating role of world-views. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 15-28.
    Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style:Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 1111-1119 .
    Chen C. A., et al. (2011). Quality of life in adults with congenital heart disease: biopsychosocial determinants and sex-related differences. Heart. 97(1),38-43
    Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2008). As-sessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate struc-ture, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293-321 .
    Clarkson, A. (2005). Educating the creative imagination: A course design and its consequences. Jung:the e-Journal of the Jungian Society for Scholarly Studies, 1(2).
    Closson, L. M., & Hymel, S. (2016). Status differences in target-specific prosocial behavior and aggression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 1836-1848 .
    Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147-163 .
    Connell, C. M., & Prinz, R. J. (2002). The impact of children and parent-child interactions on school readiness and social skills development for low-income African American children. Journal of School Psychology, 40(2), 177-193 .
    Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual.Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
    Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R)and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
    Costin, S. E., & Jones, D. C. (1992). Friendship as a facilitator of emotional responsiveness and prosocial interventions among young children. Developmental Psychology, 28, 941-947 .
    Cowie, H., & Hutson, N., (2005). Peer support: A strategy to help by standers challenge school bullying. Pastoral Care in Education, 23, 40-44 .
    Cox, J.C., & Deck, C.A. (2006). When are women more generous than men?Economic Inquiry, 44 (4), 587-598.
    Crick, N. R., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2003). The development of psychopathology in females and males: Current progress and future challenges.Development and Psychopathology, 15, 719 –742.
    Cross, R., Piggin, T., Douglas, J., & Von, K.F. (2012). Progress and Challenges in the Fight against Cyberbullying Beatbullying, Violence (2nd ed.). London.
    Danfeng Z.,Huebner E.S., Lili T.(2021). Neuroticism and cyberbullying among elementary school students: A latent growth curve modeling approachAuthor links open overlay panel. Personality and Individual Differences, 171.
    Dercole, F., Della Rossa, F., & Piccardi, C. (2019). Direct reciprocity and model-predictive rationality explain network reciprocity over social ties. Scientific Reports, 9, 5367.
    Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model.Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
    Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. New York : Cambridge University Press.
    Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society. Toronto. CA:George J. McLeod Limited.
    Fryling, M., Cotler, J. L., Rivituso, J., Mathews, L., & Pratico, S. (2015). Cyberbullying or normal game play? Impact of age, gender, and experience on cyberbullying in multi-player online gaming environments: Perceptions from one gaming forum. Journal of Information Systems Applied Research, 8, 4-18 .
    Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
    Goldberg, L. R. (1981). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologists, 48, 26-34.
    Goldsborough, R. (2010). Resources Available To Fight Growing Cyberbullying Trend. Community College Week, 22 (25), 29-29 .
    Granic, I., & Patterson, G.R. (2006). Toward a com-prehensive model of antisocial development:A dynamic systems approach. Psychological Review, 113(1), 101-131 .
    Güroglu et al., (2014). Sharing and giving across adolescence: An experimental study examining the development of prosocial behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-13.
    Ham, E., Livazović, G. (2019). Cyberbullying and emotional distress in adolescents: the importance of family, peers and school. Heliyon, 5(6), 1-9 .
    Henderson, A.T., and Mapp, K.L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact on school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory: Austin, TX.
    Hankin, B. L. (2009). Development of sex differences in depressive and co-occurring anxious symptoms during adolescence: Descriptive trajectories and potential explanations in a multiwave prospective study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 38(4), 460-472.
    Hanish, L.D., Martin, C.L., Miller, C.F., Fabes, R.A., DeLay, D., Updegraff, K.A. (2016).Social harmony in schools: A framework for understanding peer experiences and their effects.K.R. Wentzel, G.B. Ramani (Eds.), Handbook of social influences in school contexts: Social-emotional, motivation, and cognitive outcomes, Taylor and Francis Inc. pp. 48-62
    Harland, C., Brenchley, R. and Walker, H. (2003). Risk in supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply management, 9 (2), 51-62 .
    Hemphill, S.A., Tollit, M., Kotevski, A., Heerde, J.A., (2015). Predictors of traditional and cyber-bullying victimization: a longitudinal study of Australian secondary school students. J. Interpers Violence, 30 (15), 2567 – 2590 .
    Hinduja, S., & Patchin, W. J. (2008). Cyber bullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29 (2), 129-156 .
    Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14 (3), 206-221 .
    Hoff man, M. L. (1984). Empathy, its limitations, and its role in a comprehensive moral theory. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 283-302). New York, NY: Wiley.
    Ho, S. S., Chen, L., & Ng, A. P. Y. (2017). Comparing cyberbullying perpetration on social media between primary and secondary school students. Computers & Education, 109, 74-84.
    Hsu, Y.C., et al. (2009). Psychopathology and personality trait in subgroups of functional dyspepsia based on Rome iII criteria. Am J Gastroenterol, 104,2534-2542.
    Huang, Y.Y., & Chou, C. (2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1581-1590 .
    Idit, K., Dafna L., Rinat, C., & Adi, A. (2019). When parents are inconsistent: Parenting style and adolescents' involvement in cyberbullying. Journal of Adolescence, 74, 1-12 .
    Isabel, M., Sergio, M., Oscar, F. G., & Fernando G. (2019). Parenting in the digital era: Protective and risk parenting styles for traditional bullying and cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 84-92 .
    Izabela Zych, María Beltrán-Catalán, Rosario Ortega-Ruiz & Vicente J. Llorent. (2018). Social and Emotional Competencies in Adolescents Involved in Different Bullying and Cyberbullying Roles. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.), 23 (2), 86-93 .
    Jordan, T. (1999). Cyber power: The culture and politics of cyberspace and the Internet. London: Routledge.
    Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds ? -- Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78, 496-505 .
    Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Hawkins, J., et al. (2016). Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States, 2015. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 65, 1-174 .
    Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). NY: Guilford.
    Kircaburun, K., Kokkinos, C.M., Demetrovics, Z., Király, O., Griffiths, M.D., & Çolak, T.S., (2019).Problematic online behaviors among adolescents and emerging adults: Associations between cyberbullying perpetration, problematic social media use, and psychosocial factors. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction, 17 (4), 891-908.
    Kofler, M. J., McCart, M. R., Zajac, K., Ruggiero, K. J., Saunders, B. E., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (2011). Depression and delinquency covariation in an accelerated longitudinal sample of adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(4), 458-469.
    Kubiszewski, V., Fontaine, R., Potard, C., & Auzoult, L. (2015). Does cyberbullying overlap with school bullying when taking modality of involvement into account? Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 49-57.
    Lee, P. C. (2007). Parent-child interaction of children with ADHD: Research and clinical Implica-tions. Journal of Taiwan Occupational Thera-py Association, 25(1), 34-44 .
    Lee, Y.C., et al. (2006). Comparative analysis between psychological and endoscopic profiles in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a prospective study based on screening endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 21(5), 798-804.
    Lee, S.J., & Chae, Y.G. (2012). Balancing participation and risks in children’s internet use: The role of internet literacy and parental mediation. Cyber psychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 15, 257-262 .
    Leung, L., & Lee, P. S. N. (2012). Impact of internet literacy, internet addiction symptoms, and internet activities on academic performance. Social Science Computer Review, 30, 403-418 .
    Li, Q. (2008). A cross-cultural comparison of adolescents’ experience related to cyberbullying. Educational Research, 50, 223-234 .
    Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 581-599.
    Lodge, J., & Frydenberg, E. (2007). Cyber-bullying in Australian schools: Profiles of adolescent coping and insights for school practitioners. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 24 (1), 45 .
    Marco Piovesan, & Helene Willadsen ( 2021). Risk preferences and personality traits in children and adolescents. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 186, 523-532
    Maria , A., Anna , V., & Ludmila, L. (2016) . Adolescents’ World Image in Families with Various Parent-Child Interaction Styles. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 233, 73-77 .
    McDowell, D. J., & Parke, R. D. (2009). Parental correlation of children’s peer relations:an empirical test of a tripartite model. Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 224-235 .
    Mercken, L., Candel, M., Willems, P., & De Vries, H. (2009). Social influence and selection effects in the context of smoking behavior:Changes during early and mid-adolescence. Health Psychology, 28, 73-82 .
    Milani, L., Osualdella, D., & Di Blasio, P., (2009). Quality of interpersonal relationships and problematic Internet use in adolescence.Cyber Psychology Behavior, 12 (6), 681-684.
    Moksnes, U.K., Bradley Eilertsen, M.E., & Lazarewicz, M. (2016).The association between stress, self-esteem and depressive symptoms in adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57 (1), 22-29.
    Mowen, J. C., & Spear, N. (1999). A hierarchical model approach to understanding compulsive buying among college students. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(4), 407-430.
    Moore, S. G. (1982). Prosocial behavior in the early yrars: parent and peer influence. In Bernard Spodek (Ed.), Handbook of research in early childhood education. New York: Free Press.
    National Crime Prevention Council (NCPC), 2007. Teens and Cyberbullying, Executive Summary of a Report on Research. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from http://www.ncpc.org/newsroom/current-campaigns/ cyberbullying.
    Noelia Navarro-Gómez. (2017). Suicide among young Spanish people: facts and possible causes Analysis of the latest data. Clínicay Salud, 28 (1) , 25-31 .
    Olweus, D. (2012). Cyberbullying : An overrated phenomenon? European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 520-538 .
    Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: Development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 751-780 .
    Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teacher's beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct.Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332 .
    Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 148-169 .
    Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14 (3), 206-221 .
    Patterson, L. J., Allan, A., & Cross, D. (2016). Adolescent bystander behavior in the school and online environments and the implications for interventions targeting cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 16, 1-15.
    Pervin, L. A. (1989). Persons, situations, interactions: The history of a controversy and a discussion of theoretical models. Academy of Management Review, 14 (3), 350-360 .
    Plenty, S., Östberg V., & Modin, B. (2015). The role of psychosocial school conditions in adolescent prosocial behaviour. School Psychology International, 36, 283-300 .
    Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., & Sauser, W. (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 53-66.
    Quan, S. (2020). Socioeconomic status and prosocial behaviors among Chinese emerging adults: Sequential mediators of parental warmth and personal belief in a just world.Children and Youth Services Review,120.
    Rafael Miranda, Xavier Oriol, Alberto Amutio & Harry Ortúzard. (2019). Adolescent Bullying Victimization and Life Satisfaction: Can Family and School Adult Support Figures Mitigate this Effect? Revista de Psicodidáctica, 24 (1), 39-45.
    Raines-Eudy, R. (2000). Using structural equation modeling to test for differential reliability and validity: An empirical demonstration. Structural Equation Modeling, Structural Equation Modeling, 7(1), 124-141.
    Ren, Y., & Ji, B. (2019).Correlation between perceived social support and loneliness among chinese adolescnets: Mediating effect of psychological capital.Psychiatria Danubina, 31 (4), 421-428.
    Robbins, S.P. (2001). Organizational Behavior. 9th Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York.
    Rothmann, S., & Coetzer, E. P. (2003). The big five personality dimensions and job performance. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(1), 68-74.
    Salzberger, T.,Sarstedt, M., Diamantopoulos, A. (2016).Measurement in the social sciences: Where C-OAR-SE delivers and where it does not. European Journal of Marketing, 50, 1942-1952.
    Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 147-154.
    Simkin, H., & Becerra, G. (2013).El proceso de socialización. Apuntes para su exploración en el campo psicosocial.Ciencia.Docencia y Tecnología, 24(47), 119-142.
    Terado, T., Nagaura, H., & Tominaga, Y. (2010). A factual in vestigation about use of information device and experiences cyberbullying in junior high-school students. The Journal of Human Development and Clinical Psychology, 16, 89-106.
    Troop-Gordon, W., (2017). Peer victimization in adolescence: the nature, progression, and consequences of being bullied within a developmental context. J. Adolesc, 55, 116-128.
    Udris, R. (2015). Cyberbullying in Japan: An Exploration Study. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 2(8), 59-80 .
    Van Cleemput, K., Vandebosch, H., & Pabian, S. (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping,” “joining in,” and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 383-396 .
    Vandebosch, H., & Van Cleemput, K. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society, 11, 1349-1371.
    Varnhagen, C. (2007), Children and the Internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.),Psychology and the Interne:Intrapersonal, Interpersonal and Transpersonal Implications (2nd ed.), San Diego, CA:lsevier Academic Press, 37-54 .
    Widiger, T. A. (2017). Introduction. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five-factor model. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Willard, N. E. (2006). Cyberbullying and cyber threats: Responding to the challenge of online social cruelty, threats, and distress. Eugene, Oregon: Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use.
    Willard, N. E. (2007). Cyberbullying and cyber threats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress: Research Pr Pub. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from http://new.csriu.org/cyberbully/cbbook.php
    Willms, J.D., & Somers, M. A. (2001). Family, classroom and school ffects on children’s educational outcomes in Latin America. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An international Journal of Research Policy and Practice, 12, 409-445 .
    Ybarra, M., & Mitchell, K. (2004), “Youth engaging in online in online harassment: Associations with cargiver- child relationship, Internet use, and personal characteristics,” Journal of Adolescence, 27(3) , 319-336 .
    Zack, J. S. (2010). The technology of on-line counseling (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE